question
string | reference_answer
string | original_mutated_content
string | continuation_1_first_two_paras
string | final_intervened_trace_until_last_step
string | continuation_1
string | complete_answer_1
string | continuation_2
string | complete_answer_2
string | continuation_3
string | complete_answer_3
string | continuation_4
string | complete_answer_4
string | continuation_5
string | complete_answer_5
string | continuation_6
string | complete_answer_6
string | continuation_7
string | complete_answer_7
string | continuation_8
string | complete_answer_8
string | verifier_score_1
int64 | verifier_score_2
int64 | verifier_score_3
int64 | verifier_score_4
int64 | verifier_score_5
int64 | verifier_score_6
int64 | verifier_score_7
int64 | verifier_score_8
int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "However, the question is about causation, not moral responsibility. The key is the causal link. \n\(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, the problem might be structured so that the key point is that Joe's generosity is a (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, perhaps the key is that the problem states Joe's behavior was due to his generosity,(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, perhaps the key is that the problem states Joe's behavior was due to his generosity,(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is whether Joe caused the injury. The fact that his actions were due to his (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, the question might be testing the idea that even though there's a chain, the final c(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, perhaps the key is that the problem states \"Joe's behavior was due to his generosit(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "The key here is that his behavior is a trait he couldn't help, so even if there's a causal chain, s(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "The key here is that the problem states that his generosity is a basic trait he couldn't help, so e(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| 0
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nRepresentatives(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "یا maybe not? Let me think through the details again.\n\nFirst, the R&D said the program would do(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. Alternatively, perhaps the program's design by R&D included the env(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. Alternatively, maybe the program's design by R&D included both prof(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "Or perhaps the program's design inherently had environmental benefits as part of its profit strateg(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But maybe that's assuming they're lying or being deceitful. Alternatively, perhaps the program's de(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But maybe that's assuming they had to have intended it. Alternatively, maybe the fact that the prog(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the program's effect was a side effect, so their intention wasn't to help the (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But maybe that's not the case. Alternatively, perhaps the program's environmental benefit was an un(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the program's environmental benefit was an unintended consequence, but the boa(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that when Janet didn't put oil in, it's Kate's responsibility? Wait no(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the reasoning is that since Kate knew how to do it, her failure to oil the mac(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says that when Janet didn't do it, Kate isn't responsible. Wait, the problem (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the line of thought is that since Kate knew how to do it and wasn't responsibl(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the idea is that because Kate could have done it, Janet's failure wasn't the c(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the question is a counterfactual: if Janet had put oil, then the machine would(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the problem is structured so that Janet's failure to oil led to the breakdown,(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says that when Janet didn't do her job, Kate isn't responsible. Wait the prob(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says Kate \"knows how to grease and oil all the machines\" but her responsibi(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom has a huge (...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "گراهی, but wait, Benni says he used B Y33R instead because he had some left. Oh right, so the (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. Therefore, the problem (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. Therefore, the causatio(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the drying was only in the beds where both were used. So the issue is the combination. Th(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the drying was specifically where both were used. So the problem is the combination. Ther(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the plants that dried up were the ones where both were applied. T(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the drying was specifically in the beds where both were used. So the problem is the combi(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination is t(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the fact that some p(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nDrew, Kylie, Ol(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "گریزی? Wait, no. Wait, hold on. Wait, the problem says that \"only one person ordering coffee (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that contradicts. Let me think again.\n\nThe key here is the counterfactual: If Drew hadn(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that contradicts. Let me think again.\n\nThe problem states that the coffee shop turns a (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that contradicts. Let me think again.\n\nThe problem states that \"the coffee shop will t(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again step by step.\n\nFirst, the necessary condition fo(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that contradicts. Let me think again.\n\nThe problem states that \"the coffee shop will t(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again step by step.\n\nThe key points:\n\n- The shop mak(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again step by step.\n\nThe problem states that the coffe(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again.\n\nThe key here is the counterfactual: If Drew ha(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "But the question is specifically asking if the drunk driver caused the injury. So even if Joe's act(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "The problem states that Joe's talkativeness was the root cause, so the drunk driver's action was ju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "The injury was a consequence of the chain starting with Joe's talkativeness. Therefore, the drunk d(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be no, the drunk driver didn't cause it. The injury was caused by Joe's talkati(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be No, the drunk driver didn't cause the injury because the injury was caused b(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "The injury was caused by Joe's talkativeness leading to the neighbor taking the kid, then the accid(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be No, the drunk driver didn't cause it because the injury was caused by Joe's (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "The injury would not have occurred but for Joe's delay. Therefore, the drunk driver is a \"but-for\(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "The injury would not have occurred but for Joe's delay. Therefore, the drunk driver is not the actu(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| 0
| 0
| 0
| 0
| 0
| 0
| 1
| 0
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nProf. Smith wor(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But hold on, no—because the IT approval was already there. The fact that both approved her doesn'(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. The problem states that only one approval is needed. So the existen(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. The problem states that only one approval is needed. So the presenc(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that's not stated in the problem. The problem says \"only one of the committees needs to approv(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. The problem states that only one approval is needed. So the presenc(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. The problem states that only one approval is needed. So the presenc(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. The problem states that only one approval is needed. So the existen(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. The problem states that only one approval is needed. So the existen(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might not be the case. The problem states that only one approval is needed. So the existen(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "گراهششده maybe? Wait, but the problem states that Janet's responsibility is to put oil, and(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is about whether Janet's action caused it. If the problem says that Kate isn(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is whether Janet's action caused it. If Kate was supposed to do it when Jane(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is about whether Janet's action caused it. If Kate had the knowledge and cou(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is specifically asking if Janet's action caused it. If Kate was supposed to (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is about whether Janet's action caused it. If Kate had a duty to check, then(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is whether Janet's action caused it. If Kate had a duty to check, then her n(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is asking if Janet's not doing it caused it. If Kate had a duty to check or (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is asking if Janet's action (or inaction) caused it. If Kate was supposed to(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom works for a(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "ִילך Let me think again. \n\nWait, the key here is the conditions for the implosion. The implos(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the implosion happens only if both conditions are met. \n\nHold o(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but according to the problem statement, the implosion requires both the safety off and knob A(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that contradicts the problem's statement. Let me parse the problem again carefully.\n\nPr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no, the problem says the implosion happens \"automatically at 5 PM if both the safety switch (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, that can't be right. Let me parse the problem again carefully.\n\nThe problem says: \"the bui(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that contradicts the problem's statement. Let me read the problem again carefully.\n\nThe(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no, the problem says the implosion happens \"automatically at 5 PM if both the safety switch (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no, the problem states that the implosion requires both conditions. Therefore, the safety swi(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nIn a particular(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "But wait, the travel agency employees also arrived at 8:45, which they usually do. The key here is (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So if the tr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So if the tr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says \"the climate control system will turn on when the people who work at th(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So if the de(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So if the tr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So if the tr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that each office's employees can trigger it on their own. So if the tr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says \"the climate control system will turn on when the people who work at th(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 12