What do all of these people have in common? Well not a single one of them is a scientist (I include Wells in this as despite his PhD he does not work at any scientific research institution and if he has ever published any peer-reviewed work it was a long time ago and it didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t provide support for his nonsensical claims). If I want to learn about history I would go to a historian, if I want to know about law I go to a lawyer, and if I want to know about science I go to a scientist. Why do creationists insist on this completely irresponsible method of reading any old hack irrespective of what their qualifications are, as long as the work agrees with their preconceived ideas? There are plenty of good scientists who have published books explaining evolution, if only you would read what they have to say. If you want to know about evolution, try reading books by people who actually work in the subject and study it, not unqualified Christian apologists.
Hmmmm, I just did a quick perusal of this thread and saw more than seven or eight (non-evolutionist) scientists publications being described. You may want to actually look into the thread, and not just skim over it. I might suggest you read Ã¢â‚¬Å“Why is a Fly Not a Horse?Ã¢â‚¬Â by Dr. Giuseppe Sermonti for a start.
You assertion that Ã¢â‚¬Å“not a single one of them is a scientistÃ¢â‚¬Â, is baseless, and what some might consider an out-and-out lie. Be that as it may, Darwin, himself wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t a scientist (was without a degree in any scientific discipline) when he wrote Ã¢â‚¬Å“Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races
in the Struggle for LifeÃ¢â‚¬Â. Therefore, based upon your logic, he should be considered Ã¢â‚¬Å“any old hackÃ¢â‚¬Â , and his whole book is chock full of Ã¢â‚¬Å“nonsensical claimsÃ¢â‚¬Â.
I think youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll find that many of us have done extensive reading of book by evolutheists, and have found them wanting on both science and logicÃ¢â‚¬Â¦
But, if you have a problem with all that, here's a bunch of scientists you can argue with:http://www.discovery...download&id=660