|Publication number||US5170220 A|
|Application number||US 07/700,693|
|Publication date||Dec 8, 1992|
|Filing date||May 16, 1991|
|Priority date||May 21, 1990|
|Also published as||DE69105619D1, DE69105619T2, DE69105619T3, EP0458586A2, EP0458586A3, EP0458586B1, EP0458586B2|
|Publication number||07700693, 700693, US 5170220 A, US 5170220A, US-A-5170220, US5170220 A, US5170220A|
|Inventors||Kuniaki Matsumoto, Osamu Takao|
|Original Assignee||Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Chuo Electric Measurement Co., Ltd.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (15), Classifications (9), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method of regulating optical axes of two headlights for an automotive vehicle, and more specifically to a method of regulating optical axes of low beam of the headlights.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In an automotive vehicle assembly line, there is required a process of regulating optical axes of two headlights so that the light intensity boundary line (referred to as cut line) of the low beam thereof lies within a predetermined standard range, by projecting the low beam of the headlights on a frontward screen after the headlight has been assembled.
FIG. 1 shows an example of a light intensity distribution pattern of the low beam of headlights projected on a frontward screen, in which L denotes equi-illumination intensity lines; M denotes the maximum illumination intensity point; and K denotes a standard range of the light intensity distribution pattern, by way of example. Therefore, the optical axes of the headlights are regulated so that the cut line C (composed of a horizontal cut line C1 and an oblique cut line C2) indicative of boundary between a bright area a and a dark area b lies within the standard range K, as depicted in FIG. 1.
So far, since the above-mentioned optical axis regulating work for headlights has-been conducted by visual inspection, there exists a problem in that the regulation precision cannot be improved beyond a limit and further the worker's eye tends to become fatigued. To overcome this problem, recently, a method of regulating the optical axes has been proposed such that the headlight low beam is projected on a screen; the projected low beam is image detected by video cameras; detected video signals are image processed and displayed on a monitor TV to display a light distribution pattern including the light intensity boundary line (the cut line); and the optical axes are regulated so that the displayed cut line lies within a standard range on the monitor TV.
In more detail, in the case of a method disclosed in Japanese Published Unexamined (Kokai) Patent Appli. No. 63-113339, for instance, a light intensity distribution pattern of the low beam of headlights is formed on a screen disposed in front of the vehicle; a gravity center of equiillumination intensity closed-curves of a low beam having brightness beyond a predetermined value is calculated by an image processing apparatus; the image of the distribution pattern is differentiated in a vertical direction along a line passing through the gravity center; a light intensity boundary point in the vertical direction is determined on the basis of the differentiated values; the cut line is detected by binarization of the image signals, with the brightness of the light intensity boundary point as threshold; a relative distance between the gravity center and a point of intersection between the horizontal and oblique cut lines is previously obtained; a phantom cut line is determined on the basis of the gravity center and the relative distance; and the phantom line is checked as to whether lying within a standard range.
In the prior-art method as described above, however, since the cut line (light intensity boundary line) is detected by binarization of the -image signals, with the brightness of only the single light intensity boundary point as threshold, there exists a problem in that the light intensity boundary point is not determined accurately due to noise and therefore the cut line is not detected correctly, so that error is inevitably produced in the optical axis regulation. In addition, although the cut line is detected on the basis of the actual image signals at the first regulating work, since the cut line is determined on the basis of a phantom line obtained by the gravity center and the relative distance at the second and after regulating work, when sufficient image sensing conditions are not satisfied at the first work, there exists a problem in that the cut line (the light intensity boundary line) will not be detected correctly.
With these problems in mind, therefore, it is the primary object of the present invention to provide a method of regulating optical axes of two headlights for an automotive vehicle which can detect the light intensity boundary line at high speed and high reliability.
To achieve the above-mentioned object, the present invention provides a method of regulating optical axes of headlights for an automotive vehicle so that a light intensity boundary of headlight low beam lies within a predetermined range, comprising the steps of: (a) projecting the headlight low beam on the screen; (b) detecting headlight intensity on the screen; (c) calculating a sum total (T) in detected light intensity of a datum picture element (A) and some adjoining picture elements; (d) repeatedly calculating the sum totals (T) in detected light intensity along a vertical line (L); (e) calculating a difference (66 T) in light intensity sum total between two adjoining datum picture elements along the vertical line; (f) comparing the calculated difference in light intensity sum total with a predetermined value; (g) if the calculated difference exceeds the predetermined value, determining the higher light intensity datum picture element as a light intensity boundary point (CP); (h) repeating the above steps from (b) to (g) along other vertical lines arranged at predetermined picture element intervals along horizontal direction; and (i) connecting the calculated light intensity boundary points (CP) to determine the light intensity boundary line (CL). The calculated light intensity boundary line (CL) is composed of a horizontal low beam boundary line (CL1) and an inclined low beam boundary line (CL2) connected to the horizontal boundary line. The sum total in light intensity is repeatedly calculated along each of a plurality of vertical lines (L1, L2, . . . ) arranged at rough picture element intervals in the horizontal direction within a large window (W).
The method of the present invention further comprises the steps of: (a) determining a small window (S) between the two adjacent vertical lines (L1, L2) arranged at rough picture element intervals in such a way that upper and lower horizontal line positions are determined by adding and subtracting n-picture elements to and from the respective calculated light intensity boundary point (CP1, CP2) on the respective rough interval vertical lines; (b) determining fine interval vertical lines (SL1, SL2) within the determined small window; (c) obtaining each light intensity boundary point (CP1a, CP1b) on each fine interval vertical line by the same steps hereinabove described and (d) connecting the calculated light intensity boundary points obtained on the fine interval vertical lines. In addition, the method of the present invention further comprises the steps of: (a) obtaining a maximum light intensity point (M); (b) disregarding the horizontal and inclined low beam boundary lines (CL1, CL2) within a range determined by adding and subtracting a predetermined number (C) of picture elements to and from a point (E) D picture elements away from the obtained maximum light intensity point (M) in the horizontal direction on the screen; and (c) extending phantom horizontal and inclined boundary lines (HL1, HL2) from the horizontal and inclined boundary lines (CL1, CL2) to determine the point (E) as a connection point.
In the method according to the present invention, since the light intensity boundary points are detected along vertical lines arranged at predetermined picture element intervals along the horizontal direction on the screen, without detecting the light intensity boundary points all over the screen, to determine the cut line (the boundary line) by connecting the detected light intensity boundary points, it is possible to increase the image signal processing speed and to detect each cut line on the basis of image signal data on the screen for each optical axis regulating work of each automotive vehicle.
FIG. 1 is an illustration showing an example of a headlight low beam light intensity distribution pattern and a standard range in a prior-art method of regulating the optical axes of the headlights;
FIG. 2 is an illustration showing an example of image displayed on the monitor TV in the method of regulating optical axes of the headlights according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is an illustration showing an optical axis regulating system to which the present invention is applied;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an image processing unit;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an embodiment of the image processing and optical axis regulating procedure according to the present invention;
FIG. 6 is an illustration for assistance in explaining the regions near a datum pixel (picture element) on the monitor TV;
FIG. 7 is an illustration for assistance in explaining the difference T in light intensity sum along a vertical line;
FIG. 8 is an illustration for assistance in explaining the vertical lines, the large window, and the small window;
FIG. 9 is an enlarged illustration showing a dot-dashed circle I shown in FIG. 8 and for assistance in explaining how to obtain light intensity boundary points within the small window;
FIG. 10 is an illustration for assistance in explaining the smoothing processing of the light intensity boundary points;
FIG. 11 is an illustration for assistance in explaining the approximate lines along light intensity boundary points; and
FIG. 12 is an illustration for assistance in explaining the method of obtaining a continuous line on the basis of the approximate lines.
FIG. 3 is an illustration showing a headlight optical axis regulating system, to which the method of the present invention is applied. The system for regulating optical axes of headlights 2a and 2b of an automotive vehicle 1 comprises a screen 3 disposed in front of the automotive vehicle 1 and irradiated with a low beam of the two headlights 2a and 2b; two side video cameras 4a and 4b for image sensing the two headlights 2a and 2b from both the sides of the vehicle; and two picture video cameras 5a and 5b disposed on both sides of the automotive vehicle 1, for image sensing a light intensity distribution pattern formed by a low beam of the two headlights 2a and 2b and projected upon the screen 3, respectively. The video signals outputted from these video cameras 4a, 4b, 5a and 5b, are selectively inputted to a video interface 20 of an image signal processing unit 6. The video interface 20 processes (e.g. amplifies, filters, clamps, etc.) these video signals, converts these analog video signals into digital video signals, and gives these digital video signals to a controller 21 via a video bus 29. The controller 21 controls the entire operation of the processing unit 6. That is, the controller 21 stores these digital video signals in two image memory units 23 and 24, respectively via a video bus 31, and transmits these digital video signals to a CPU 25 for sequential data processing and further to an IPP (image pipelined processor) 26 for parallel data processing. The image data processed by these CPU 25 and IPP 33 as described later in further detail are displayed on a monitor TV 7 via a CRTC (cathode-ray tube controller 22) and the video interface 20. On the other hand, when data are required to be printed, image data are transmitted from the image memory unit 24 to a printer 8 via an I/0 interface 28 in response to a command signal outputted from the controller 21. Further, in the above image processing unit 6, the basic data processing is executed by the CPU 25 and the IPP 26, and the priority of the data transfer operation via the video system buses 29, 30, 31, and 32 is determined by the controller 21. Further, various data and programs are stored in a system memory 27 and then transferred to the controller 21 via the image memory unit 23 where necessary.
With reference to the attached drawings, image signal processing procedure of the image processing unit 6 will be described hereinbelow.
First, the image processing unit 6, under control of controller 21, hereinafter control, detects a height of the two headlights 2a and 2b on the basis of video signals outputted from the two side video cameras 4a and 4b, calculates the image position of a cut line (light intensity boundary) standard range K including an upper limit line KU and a lower limit KL according to the detected headlight height as shown in FIG. 2, and displays the calculated standard range K on the monitor TV 7. The upper limit line KU is composed of a horizontal line KU1 and an inclined line KU2, and the lower limit line KL is also composed of a horizontal line KL1 and an inclined line KL2.
Thereafter, control processes video signals inputted by the two video cameras 5a and 5b in accordance with the flowchart shown in FIG. 5. Image data obtained by the video cameras 5a and 5b are stored in the image memory unit 23 or 24 (in step S1). These image data on the screen 3 are composed of 512 (horizontal)×512 (vertical) picture elements (pixels), and classified in brightness (light intensity) into 256 gradations. Thereafter, control repeatedly calculates a sum total in brightness of a plurality of pixels near a datum (basic) pixel on the screen and repeatedly stores the calculated brightness sum in the system memory 27. In more detail with reference to FIG. 6, control calculates a sum total T (i, j) in brightness of a datum (basic) pixel A (i, j) and three adjoining pixels A (i, j+1), A (i+1, j+1) and A (i+1, j). Then, control repeats the above calculation by shifting the datum pixel one by one downward in the vertical direction. That is, control calculates a sum total T(i, j+1) in brightness of four pixels of A (i, j+1), A (i, j+2), A (i+1, j+2) and A (i+1, j+1). The above-mentioned operation of calculating the sum total in brightness is repeated in the vertical direction Y. In this operation, the brightness sum is not calculated all over the screen picture, but over a large window W (the minimum area required to determine a cut line (light intensity boundary line) and slightly smaller than the screen A) as shown in FIG. 8. That is, the large window W is divided into a plurality of vertical lines L with an h (e.g. 32)-dot (picture element) pitch (interval) in the horizontal direction, and the brightness sum is calculated downward along the divided vertical line L. Further, in the above description, although the brightness sum is calculated to four pixels (dots), it is of course possible to determine an appropriate number of pixels near the datum pixel under consideration of noise. In this specification, the terms dots, pixels and picture elements are used in the same or similar meaning. Further, the terms brightness, light intensity and illumination intensity are used in the same or similar meanings.
Thereafter, control calculates a difference ΔT in brightness sum between two adjoining datum pixels arranged in the vertical direction Y for each vertical line L, as shown in FIG. 7 (in step S3). For instance, if the two brightness sums of two adjoining datum pixels are T (i, j+2) and T (i, j+3). the difference ΔT2 between the two is T (i, j+3) -T (i, j+2).
Then, control extracts a pixel at which the difference ΔT is the maximum (in step S4). In FIG. 7, for instance, if the maximum difference ΔT in light intensity sum total is ΔT3, a pixel having a higher brightness (light intensity) sum T (i, j+4) of the two brightness (light intensity) sums T (i, j+3) and T (i, j+4) used to obtain the difference a T3 between the two is extracted. Further, the maximum difference value (boundary point) is determined to such a level that the same cut line (boundary line) can be obtained in the same way as when the worker detects the maximum difference value by visual inspection. In general, although the maximum difference value ΔT is usually selected as the boundary point for-each line L, there exist some cases where the cut line roughly equal to that determined by visual inspection can be obtained, when the difference value ΔT other than the maximum value is selected, according to the light intensity distribution pattern.
The datum pixel extracted in step S4 along the vertical line L is determined as a light intensity boundary (cut line) point CP, and plural vertical positions of the extracted datum pixels are obtained in the same way, as shown in FIG., 8 (in step S5). As described above, it is possible to determine light intensity boundary (cut line) points CP along each vertical line L on the TV picture, extending in the horizontal direction.
In the above image signal processing, plural vertical lines L are determined at predetermined (e.g. 32) dot intervals along the horizontal direction, to obtain each cut line point CP on each vertical line. Therefore, when the horizontal dot interval is decreased to increase the number of vertical lines, it is possible to obtain a great number of cut line points CP and therefore to improve the cut line point detecting precision. However, when the number of the vertical lines are increased simply, the image data processing speed drops. To overcome this problem, the pitch of the vertical lines L is determined to be 32 dots for instance within the large window W as shown in FIG. 8, and further a small window S is determined between the two vertical lines L1 and L2 in the large window W on the basis of the vertical positions of the cut line points CP1 and CP2 along the two adjacent vertical lines. Further, plural vertical lines SLn are determined at predetermined dot pitch intervals within the small window S, and cut line points CPn are calculated for each vertical lines SLn in the small window S. In determination of the small window S, the width in the vertical direction Y thereof is determined in such a way as to extend from a vertical position n-dot higher than the higher cut line point CP of the two adjacent vertical lines L to a vertical position n-dot lower than the lower cut line point CP of the two adjacent vertical lines L. For instance, with reference to FIG. 9, if the cut line point on the vertical line L1 in the large window W is CP1 and that on the vertical line L2 adjacent to L1 is CP2, the vertical width of the small window S is determined from a vertical point P n-dots lower than the lower cut line point CP1 to a vertical point Q n-dots higher than the higher cut line point CP2. Further, a predetermined number of vertical lines SL1, SL2, and SL3 are determined within the small window S, and each cut line point CP1a, CP1b, and CP1c are calculated in the same way as in the large window W.
By the above-mentioned image signal processing, a number of cut line points with a relatively small pitch can be obtained as shown in FIG. 10, since the dispersion of the calculated cut line points is relatively large, a smoothing or averaging processing is necessary. As shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, a predetermined number of dots (e.g. m dots) are collected into a group in the horizontal direction in such a way that the half (m/2 dots) are overlapped with each other, and an approximate line AL is calculated on the basis of the cut line points CP for each group in accordance with the method of least square (in step S6). However, since the calculated approximate lines AL do not form a continuously connected line, the following process is further required (in step S7). That is , as shown in FIG. 12, in the case of an approximate line AL1 and another approximate line AL2 overlapped with AL1, if the start point of the approximate line AL2 in the horizontal direction is assumed as an origin of the coordinate axis x, the ordinate yp at which the two approximate lines AL1 and AL2 are connected continuously can be calculated as ##EQU1## where y1 is the ordinate of the approximate line AL1 at the abscissa x in a horizontal range of m/2 dots; and y2 is the ordinate of the approximate line AL2 at the same abscissa x.
When the above-mentioned smoothing calculation is executed for each range of m/2 dots, it is possible to obtain a cut line (light intensity boundary line) CL, as shown by a dot-dot-dashed line in FIG. 10, as a smoothed continuous line.
According to the illumination intensity distribution pattern of the headlights 2a and 2b, there exists some cases where it is difficult to detect the cut line CL near a point of intersection between the horizontal cut line CL1 and the inclined cut line CL2, near the maximum light intensity point M, as shown in FIG. 2. To overcome this problem, control obtains an image position of the maximum light intensity point, in parallel to the processing of the above-mentioned steps from S2 to S7, and phantom cut lines HL1 and HL2 are determined at the area near the maximum light intensity point M. In more detail, after control stores image data in the image memory unit 23 or 24 (in step S1), the image signals are quantitized by binarization on the basis of a predetermined threshold (in step S12). Control calculates a gravity center of the equiilumination intensity closed curve N on the basis of the binary image data (in step S13), and determines the calculated gravity center as the maximum light intensity point M (in step S14). Further, control assumes that the point E of intersection between the horizontal and oblique lines CL1 and CL2 is located on a vertical line D-dots shifted away in the horizontal direction (X) from the maximum light intensity point M and disregards the cut lines CL within ranges determined by adding and subtracting C-dots to and from a vertical line LD D-dots away from the point M. That is, a horizontal line HL1 is extended from the rightmost end point F of the horizontal cut line CL1 to determine a point of intersection E between the horizontal line HL1 and the vertical line LD. Finally, the inclined line HL2 is obtained by extending the leftmost end point G of the inclined cut line CL2 to the point E, so that a phantom cut line HL can be obtained as shown in FIG. 2.
On the basis of the above-mentioned image data processing, cut line positions are determined along each vertical line (in step S8), and control displays the above-mentioned cut line standard range K and the obtained cut line HL on the monitor TV as shown in FIG. 2 (in step S9). Further, the maximum light intensity point M is indicated by + mark on the monitor TV 7 on the basis of the point obtained in step S14, as depicted in FIG. 2 (in step S15).
Thereafter, the worker compares the cut line CL of the headlights thus obtained with the cut line standard range K in position to check whether the low beam position is acceptable or not (in step S10), and displays the check results on the monitor TV 7 (in step S11).
In practice, the optical axis regulating work of the headlight is made in such a way that the cut line CL is located within the cut line standard range K when the worker turns an adjust screws while watching the monitor TV 7 or when an optical axis regulating robot turns the adjust screws in feedback control operation in response to the video signals processed as described above.
As described above, in the present invention, since the cut line (light intensity boundary line) can be detected at high speed on the basis of the light intensity distribution pattern projected on the screen 3 and in accordance with video signal processing operation, by detecting each cut line CL for each vehicle test, it is possible to accurately perform the optical axis regulating work of the headlights 2a and 2b.
As described above, in the method of regulating optical axes of the headlights, since the light intensity boundary points along a plurality of the vertical lines can be detected at predetermined pixel intervals in the horizontal direction on the basis of updated video images, and further the boundary line can be determined by connecting the respective light intensity boundary points, it is possible to improve the image processing speed and the reliability of the optical axis regulating work.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3805239 *||Jan 24, 1973||Apr 16, 1974||Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co||Pattern treating apparatus|
|US4634275 *||Jul 17, 1984||Jan 6, 1987||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Method of and apparatus for examining automotive headlamp|
|US4647195 *||Jul 17, 1984||Mar 3, 1987||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Automotive headlamp testing method and apparatus|
|US4675909 *||Feb 8, 1985||Jun 23, 1987||Nec Corporation||Binary character signal producing apparatus|
|US4747157 *||Apr 14, 1986||May 24, 1988||Fanuc Ltd.||Spatial product sum calculating unit|
|US4907877 *||Nov 9, 1988||Mar 13, 1990||Yutaka Fukuda||Light destribution of headlight beam|
|JPS63113339A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5373357 *||Oct 21, 1992||Dec 13, 1994||Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation||Headlight aiming method using pattern framing|
|US5426500 *||Jan 4, 1994||Jun 20, 1995||Chuo Electronic Measurement Co., Ltd.||Illuminance measurement of vehicle lamp|
|US6766066 *||Mar 15, 2001||Jul 20, 2004||Seiko Epson Corporation||Detection of pointed position using image processing|
|US7153009 *||Feb 10, 2004||Dec 26, 2006||Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||Vehicular headlamp|
|US7876427||Jan 25, 2011||Stephen Waller Melvin||Headlamp alignment detection using a network of independent sensor units|
|US7907261 *||Sep 11, 2008||Mar 15, 2011||Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||Optical axis inspection method and optical axis inspection apparatus|
|US8004663||Aug 23, 2011||Stephen Waller Melvin||Headlamp aim detection with sensors independent from host control unit|
|US8125628||Jan 17, 2009||Feb 28, 2012||Lones Joe J||Light baffling apparatus for headlamp sensor|
|US8184275||May 22, 2012||Stephen Waller Melvin||Vehicle headlamp monitoring using a network accessible user interface|
|US9086322 *||Feb 25, 2013||Jul 21, 2015||GM Global Technology Operations LLC||Method and device for determining a radiation characteristic for an illumination device of a vehicle|
|US20020011987 *||Mar 15, 2001||Jan 31, 2002||Seiko Epson Corporation||Detection of pointed position using image processing|
|US20040160772 *||Feb 10, 2004||Aug 19, 2004||Masashi Tatsukawa||Vehicular headlamp|
|US20080316487 *||May 30, 2006||Dec 25, 2008||Seetech Sabadell S.C.P.||Method of Timing Headlamps or Lighting Projectors|
|US20090073703 *||Sep 11, 2008||Mar 19, 2009||Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||Optical axis inspection method and optical axis inspection apparatus|
|US20130222792 *||Feb 25, 2013||Aug 29, 2013||GM Global Technology Operations LLC||Method and device for determining a radiation characteristic for an illumination device of a vehicle|
|U.S. Classification||356/121, 356/154|
|Cooperative Classification||G01M11/065, G01M11/064, G01M11/067|
|European Classification||G01M11/06D, G01M11/06C2, G01M11/06C|
|Aug 15, 1991||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CHUO ELECTRIC MEASUREMENT CO., LTD., JAPAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:MATSUMOTO, KUNIAKI;TAKAO, OSAMU;REEL/FRAME:005799/0821;SIGNING DATES FROM 19910628 TO 19910710
Owner name: NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD., JAPAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:MATSUMOTO, KUNIAKI;TAKAO, OSAMU;REEL/FRAME:005799/0821;SIGNING DATES FROM 19910628 TO 19910710
|May 29, 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|May 30, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|May 4, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12