These authors contributed equally and are listed as co-first authors.
Application of systems biology principles to protein biomarker discovery: Urinary exosomal proteome in renal transplantation
Version of Record online: 29 JUN 2012
© 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications
Volume 6, Issue 5-6, pages 268–278, June 2012
How to Cite
Pisitkun, T., Gandolfo, M. T., Das, S., Knepper, M. A. and Bagnasco, S. M. (2012), Application of systems biology principles to protein biomarker discovery: Urinary exosomal proteome in renal transplantation. Prot. Clin. Appl., 6: 268–278. doi: 10.1002/prca.201100108
Colour Online: See the article online to view Figs. 1 and 2 in colour.
- Issue online: 29 JUN 2012
- Version of Record online: 29 JUN 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 29 MAY 2012 02:04AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 29 FEB 2012
- Manuscript Received: 13 DEC 2011
- National Kidney Foundation of Maryland
- operating budget of Division of Intramural Research
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Grant Number: ZO1-HL001285
In mass spectrometry (MS)-based studies to discover urinary protein biomarkers, an important question is how to analyze the data to find the most promising potential biomarkers to be advanced to large-scale validation studies. Here, we describe a “systems biology-based” approach to address this question.
We analyzed large-scale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) data of urinary exosomes from renal allograft recipients with biopsy-proven evidence of immunological rejection or tubular injury (TI). We asked whether bioinformatic analysis of urinary exosomal proteins can identify biological-process based protein groups that correlate with biopsy findings and whether the protein groups fit with general knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved.
LC-MS/MS analysis of urinary exosomal proteomes identified more than 1000 proteins in each pathologic group. These protein lists were analyzed computationally to identify the Biological Process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway terms that are significantly associated with each pathological group. Among the most informative terms for each group were: “sodium ion transport” for TI; “immune response” for all rejection; “epithelial cell differentiation” for cell-mediated rejection; and “acute inflammatory response” for antibody-mediated rejection. Based on these terms, candidate biomarkers were identified using a novel strategy to allow a dichotomous classification between different pathologic categories.
Conclusions and clinical relevance
The terms and candidate biomarkers identified make rational connections to pathophysiological mechanisms, suggesting that the described bioinformatic approach will be useful in advancing large-scale biomarker identification studies toward a validation phase.