A German debunking site posted SOHO images purporting to show that the Winged Globe of Planet X,
with streaming tail, was appearing in 1999, well before the arrival date of Planet X into the inner solar
system in 2003.
I have found these pictures in a German Debunker forum. The explanation there
are asteroids. It looks like Planet X of the last years. Now I am confused. Are the
pictures or the date from NASA faked?
The Germans were suspicious, noting that this 1999 example did not have the appearance of an asteroid
or comet, which would have a streaming tail but only one leading edge, not the wings.
Welchseln to itself these asteroids before the sun possibly from like with a relay
race? Why are 2 winged never sometimes at the same time on SOHO on it for
many years? Why is never first for a few years the behind lump-tail constantly
with on it and before? Only all asteroids are recently "mutated" to this
behaviour? I have seen old SOHO pictures from before 2003, there a winged also
sometimes never was on it, however, with lump in the dragging. Besides, the
winged is always single. Chance? Strangely.
A very active thread on the Pole Shift ning resulted, where these 1999 images were examined. What
was discovered was obvious signs of doctoring in the 1999 images. Checking the NASA archives for
SOHO, it was discovered that even the official archives have these doctored SOHO images, an inside
job! The doctoring, a cut-and-paste job, showed up in many different analyses. One analysis was to
note the smeared appearance, which does not appear on C3 images that are legit and untouched. In
fact, the doctored appearance on the image posted on the German debunker site has a different
appearance than the doctored appearance on the NASA archives for SOHO. Note also the dark blue
area under the paste, which is not consistent with the sunrays coming from the Sun. First, the doctored
August 15, 1999 17:18 image.
And then for comparison, the March 27, 2009 3:18 image.
Another approach used to identify that the 1999 images were doctored was to color enhance. The
pasted material emerged with a different blue background on the doctored C3 SOHO image than the
surrounding area, but in fact has the same appearance that the pasted date that all SOHO images
I did an enhancement from one of the posted images dated 1999/08/15. The
grouping around the main body from 1999 shows a different pattern grouping of
material than the pattern grouping of material of analysis of current SOHO
images of Planet X that I've enhanced. The enhancement that I used to show the
grouping pattern of PX came from a blog entitled "Lasco C2 Frame 2010/01/22
11:54". The enhanced picture shown is Lasco C2 Frame 2010/01/22 11:54.
Doctored SOHO C2 images likewise showed the smeary effect, when the colors were reversed. Plus
the C2 image on the German site for August 15, 1999 2:30 was again different from that drawn from
the SOHO archives maintained by NASA. For comparison, a SOHO C2 image for January 21, 2010
at 7:31 show what a color reversal on a non-doctored image looks like. First, the doctored August 15,
1999 2:30 image.
Then the legit January 21, 2010 7:31 image.
The Zetas have long maintained that SOHO Images were being airbrushed to hide the presence of
Planet X, but this airbrushing takes place prior to the final image capture, before the images are made
available to the public. Nevertheless, this attempt to hide the presence of Planet X had been noticed, as
vertical edit lines would appear, and one observer caught that Saturn disappeared from a frame, then
reappeared last December 4, 2009.
The airbrushing of SOHO images was implied when Planet X would only show up sporadically.
Hello, I would like to know why in SOHO's photos we can see Planet X just only in
one image? Is it possible that NASA has missed such an image? If it is so, then
why haven't they corrected their mistake and why hasn't this image been
ZetaTalk Comment 6/20/2009: Once the image is out, they fear to replace it as that would surely
scream of a cover-up. We have mentioned in the past that there are computer programs in place
that replace the location where Planet X is expected to be with something normal. Each image is
quickly set right, in this way, in time to provide it to the public in the timely manner they have
come to expect. But Planet X is not always where the computer programs expect it to be. It is not
so much that Planet X itself moves, and quickly, but that the satellite taking images moves. There
are many particle flows bombarding the area of Earth at this time, most unknown to man, and
satellites far out in space move aside or are attracted. Those monitoring SOHO images are also
distracted, some despondent about the cover-up, and miss these exceptions in any audits they do
until it is too late. If out in the public, or feared out in the public, then best left alone, is the logic.
NASA's recent reaction to the frequent appearance of Planet X on SOHO has been downtime, and no
SOHO C3 was down from 12/07 15:18 to 12/09 00:18, close to 36 hours with no
explanation. SOHO C2 was down from 12/07 15:08 to 12/09 00:06 also. SOHO
EIT's (closeup of sun surface) were not down at all, so it was not the satellite.
Stereo COR1 and COR2 did not have down time either.
ZetaTalk Comment 12/12/2009: The downtime was due to consternation at NASA and JPL over
what to say about the continuing appearance of the Planet X complex on the various satellites
maintained by the US and its partners. When Planet X blundered into the SOHO red image on
December 23, 2007, replete with streaming tail, the establishment decided to pretend it never
happened and ignore it. Since many copies of this appearance of Planet X were out and about on
the Internet, to withdraw or airbrush that image would imply a cover-up. So they ignored it. But
in 2009 these accidents kept coming, with increasing frequency, starting on March 21, 2009 with
the dramatic appearance of the Winged Globe. Then the Stereo Ahead showed Planet X as the
Red Cross of yor on December 4-5, 2009. Of course, the many spies out and about on the Internet
reported that this too was a flaming subject, another example of how their airbrush programs
are failing to keep pace with the bobbling about that the satellites, the Earth, and Planet X are
doing these days. Their choices were few - shut down the SOHO and Stereo service, improve the
airbrushing programs, or continue to ignore the occasional appearance of Planet X. After heated
discussion in smoke filled rooms, the decision was to continue to live with the status quo.
But for outright doctoring of the SOHO images on the NASA archives is new. What does this mean?
ZetaTalk Prediction 1/25/2010: In the past month, those at NASA have been almost frantic about
the appearance of Planet X on their SOHO images. The decision to simply ignore this, or to
assert that the WISE scan has picked up an increasing number of asteroids in the area, has
seemed too light a response. Certainly the argument could be made, as it was on the German
site, that asteroids never looked like this in the past, with a drifting tail and wings. Those at
NASA fear their participation in the cover-up will be revealed, and as the arm of the US
government responsible for monitoring space, they would be the likely scapegoats. Angry mobs
at their gates, an inability to go home, and no place to run as it is not yet time to dash to the
bunkers. Gripped by fear, some at NASA made stupid decisions, allowing the SOHO archives to
be doctored, or should we say allowing doctored images to replace the original. The plan was to
get the buzz on the Internet in their favor, that what is being interpreted to be Planet X on SOHO
images lately have been around a long time, thus are likely some sort of asteroid swarm. Rather
than go to message boards Nancy frequents, they took a side path, posting these on a German
site. What was not expected was how quickly the obvious doctoring would be identified, so
quickly that the asteroid swarm excuse could not take hold. What now? They will attempt to
utilize the media, claiming that any electromagnetic interference is due to the mild activity of the
Sun, and hammering the story that asteroids newly discovered by their WISE probe are swarming
about. By this, they hope that those in the populace who can be led like sheep will dismiss any
Internet buzz that asserts otherwise. This is not a wise move on the part of NASA, however, as
other evidence of Planet X and its vast tail have already been noted - such as the Norway swirl,
neon clouds, and the recent Australian radar circles. We have hinted that there are more things
pending, which will discombobulate the establishment and put rips in the cover-up. By layering lie
upon lie, those in NASA will only compound the rage that the public will visit upon them when
the truth is finally out.
On January 15, 2010 and again on January 22, 2010 Colin Andrews featured odd snowy radar circles
on his site.
- What Now? Seen on Radar by Thousands Today Over Australia.
January 22, 2010
- I have received E-mails from all over Australia today reporting this rather extraordinary
feature captured on the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology radar site. This
follows a series of so far u-explained features seen on Australian national radars since the
15th. For a while radar from the Melbourne Airport facility was out of action ( see below).
Another strange ring appeared today over the South East of the country as seen below.
A radar savy individual noted that if one turned off the radar on the satellite image, the snow circles went
away. Thus, this was an effect of the radar, solely. The Zetas explain.
ZetaTalk Explanation 1/25/2010: Radar sweeps pick up matter, such as flying objects or even
heavy precipitation. Man is used to thinking that radar sweeps present only what the eye of man
can perceive. But this is an electronic device, not a human eye. What would cause radar to record
what man cannot see, and what is it perceiving? The white areas that look like spokes on a wheel
are the lingering results of changes that the radar emissions caused in the atmosphere, a type of
coagulation of particles that clump together and then have a dearth in between the spokes. This
is very common in particle behavior, as we have explained, the desire for similar particles to
clump or group. In this case, the dearth of particles in between the spokes is due to these
particles in those locations being swept into a nearby spoke's clumping.
So what is the particle, and why has this not been seen elsewhere or previously? We have
repeatedly stated that the vast tail of Planet X is pointing toward the Earth, as it blows out from
the magnetic N Pole of Earth and this is pointing almost directly at Earth. The tail has
petrochemicals in it, greasy elements, and charged dust. It has created halos around the Moon
and Sun at times, and neon clouds. The charged dust has created dramatic swirls, due to
magnetic parts of the atmosphere chasing away or toward each other. The most dramatic
example of this to date was the Norway swirl, which included a neon spiral at the center,
grounding in the Earth.
The Australia radar circles are not caused by these greasy elements nor are they caused by
charged dust in the atmosphere. Australia lies near the Earth's magnetic S Pole, which is south of
this continent but nevertheless nearby. The Earth's magnetosphere is being tugged and twisted,
at times the S Pole of Earth seemingly absent, as the magnetosphere of Planet X is pulling it into
alignment, end-to-end. This is a predecessor to the lean to the left and the 3 days of darkness,
when the influence will be stronger. Nonetheless, at times the Earth today is dealing with a
failure or lack of magnetic particles returning to the S Pole, and this sets into play all manner of
other dramas in the atmosphere.
We have mentioned that for every sub-atomic particle that man is aware of, we, the Zetas, are
aware of 1,000, such is mankind's ignorance. Thus, it would be pointless to name the particles
involved in the radar circles. It is an accumulation of these particles, normally swept along with
magnetons into the magnetic S Pole of Earth, that are clumping. This drama is unlikely to appear
outside of the area of the magnetic S Pole of Earth, so will remain in all likelihood an Australian
drama, unexplained in man's scientific terms, a mystery to all but those who follow ZetaTalk.
S America Roll
Unlike the usual pattern on the IRIS charts, where the Asian side of the Ring of Fire is full of circles
indicating recent earthquakes and the Americas are fairly light in this regard, S America and the
Caribbean have become very active.
- Argentina hit by 6.3 magnitude earthquake after Haiti and Venezuela
January 17, 2010
- The latest news is a 6.3 magnitude earthquake struck Argentina after the 7.0 Haiti
Earthquake and the 5.6 Venezuela Earthquake, and all less than a week apart.
This fits with a portion of a holographic vision I attended recently, which described the S America roll.
However, what happened recently could not be considered fulfilling that vision, as it was too slight! The
Caribbean is still whole, and the vision had the Caribbean virtually crumbling in many places.
Over to S America the Andes are shown doing mountain building, while some
islands in the Caribbean are sinking, their plate pushed under as S America rolls.
You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly