|Publication number||US6999993 B1|
|Application number||US 09/464,348|
|Publication date||Feb 14, 2006|
|Filing date||Dec 15, 1999|
|Priority date||Dec 15, 1999|
|Also published as||US7461129, US20060106942|
|Publication number||09464348, 464348, US 6999993 B1, US 6999993B1, US-B1-6999993, US6999993 B1, US6999993B1|
|Inventors||Milan M. Shah, Keith K. Lau, Jeffrey C. Stamerjohn|
|Original Assignee||Microsoft Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Non-Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (31), Classifications (9), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the establishment and support of end-user extensible electronic mail. More specifically, the present invention relates to systems and methods for allowing end-users of electronic mail to extend standard electronic mail protocol for the creation of user-defined commands that are recognizable and executable by an electronic mail system and that can alter processing performed after a server accepts a piece of electronic mail.
2. The Prior State of the Art
With the advent of the personal computer, individuals everywhere at anytime rely on electronic mail (email) as a principal mode of communication and means for exchanging information. Electronic communication is at times utilized between individuals down the hall, or alternatively between individuals located around the globe. Email has become a valuable tool for individuals and businesses alike. Individuals worldwide keep in touch with friends and family through the use of email messages by sending electronic letters, birthday cards and holiday greetings, which include text, graphics and/or animation. Businesses use email systems to exchange word processing documents, spreadsheets, data objects, electronic forms, graphic images, and so forth. Businesses also employ email systems to schedule and reschedule meetings, and at times prefer electronic communication in order to memorialize a conversation. Electronic newspapers and newsletters are delivered to email boxes, mass mailings are performed electronically for advertising purposes, and print commands are regularly sent to email accounts. In today's world, email messaging has become such a popular mode of communication and means for exchanging information that collections of valid email addresses have become a valuable commodity.
While electronic mail systems are used worldwide, the discrete functions required or desired by the various users of electronic messaging systems for running the email communications are not identical. Some individuals use email systems that only support text, while other individuals require email systems that support detailed formatting and graphic imaging. At times users send electronic messages for casual conversational purposes only, while other times the sender of the electronic message requires that the exchange be encrypted to preserve the confidentiality of the information. Many users receive such a high volume of electronic mail that they rely on flags to indicate the priority level of the communication, whereas other users receive email so infrequently that they eagerly wait for the delivery of an email message in their box. Various senders of electronic messages require their email system to track the message sent to ensure delivery, to verify that the message has been read, and/or to notify the sender when the message is either undelivered or unread. Alternatively, other senders of email are made aware that their message was sent upon the delivery of a responding message from the receiver. At times, email users employ functions that provide visual or audible notification of the arrival of an electronic message while they are involved in other applications, whereas other users are required to log into their email account to verify the arrival of an electronic message.
While email users require and/or desire a plethora of specialized features, electronic mail systems have been traditionally distributed as a “one size fits all” package. An electronic mail system has been made available to computer users as a bundled package that includes all of the commands, features and formats of that specific system. Thus, when a user desires a specific command, function or format that is not included in the system package, that user must frequently wait until the designer of the email system includes the specialized feature in a newer version of the email package. In the upgraded version, the new feature is generally bundled with a variety of other features. Thus, this traditional method for obtaining the desired feature forces users to upgrade the entire email package in order to pick up the incremental feature, and frequently requires users to receive features that are not desired or needed simply because they were bundled with the desired feature. This process of needing to upgrade the system in order to obtain a desired feature results in the consumption of large amounts of money and/or storage space for individuals and businesses.
It would therefore be desirable for an email user to be able to enhance his/her email system by receiving a specifically desired feature without being required to also receive undesired features. It would also be desirable for an email user to be able to freely create individually customizable features for his/her own email system. It would be desirable for a commercially produced electronic mail system to support the user-created customized features. Furthermore, it would be desirable if an email user could create a user-created feature that could be set up as a default in that user's email box, thereby customizing the various defaults of the user's email system. Any electronic mail model that could exhibit such capabilities would be particularly useful for preserving cost and storage space by allowing a user to add user-customized features to commercially available electronic mail messaging systems.
The present invention relates to methods and systems for allowing end-users of electronic mail (email) to extend standard electronic mail protocol for the creation of user-defined commands that are recognizable and executable by an electronic mail system and that can alter processing performed after a server accepts a piece of electronic mail. Under the present invention, a user can add or remove features of an email system to create a full-featured, individually customized email system.
The methods and systems of the present invention provide a mechanism whereby user-defined commands are able to extend standard email protocol, without deviating from the protocol specification, and are also able to alter processing performed after a server accepts a piece of electronic mail. According to the present invention, an inbound network protocol engine manages a client's connection to a configured port on a server machine. A protocol event dispatcher examines the commands sent from the client and determines if a corresponding user-defined command has been registered in an event-binding database. If the command is registered, the server executes the command and uses the results to compute a response to the client. Alternatively, if the command is not registered in the database, the server executes a default command and uses the results of that default command to generate a response to the client.
After the client/server protocol exchange is performed and the server receives a piece of email, the mail is submitted to a queuing module for the processing of newly arrived mail. The processing is performed according to operations registered in the event-binding database, comprising standard and/or user-defined commands. The mail is subsequently categorized according to the registered operations for the performance of any directory list expansion and/or address translation. An intelligent routing mechanism determines the course the mail is to take for its transmission to its final destination, and forces the mail to follow the route.
A link object is created to allow a registered operation to perform preparatory processing for link management, such as determining the time for scheduling a link with a subsequent server. A connection manager determines the number of connections that are to be made with the server and requests that an outbound protocol engine initiate the connections. The outbound protocol engine allows a registered operation to implement its own name for network address mapping, and uses standard protocol as a default to resolve any conflicts between network names and addresses. Once the connection is established with the subsequent server, the outbound protocol engine, on a session-by-session basis, allows registered operations to employ extensions on standard protocol. The session is then terminated after the mail is transferred.
Therefore, under the present invention, end-users of electronic mail are able to create user-defined commands that extend standard electronic mail protocol, without deviating from the protocol specification, that are recognizable and executable by an electronic mail system, and that can alter processing performed after a server accepts a piece of electronic mail. As such, a user can add or remove features of an email system to create a full-featured, individually customized email system.
Additional features and advantages of the present invention will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the invention. The features and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
In order that the manner in which the above recited and other advantages and features of the invention are obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof, which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawing depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention relates to both methods and systems for allowing end-users of electronic mail to create user-defined commands that extend standard electronic mail protocol, without deviating from the protocol specification, that are recognizable and executable by an electronic mail system, and that can alter processing performed after a server accepts a piece of electronic mail. As such, the present invention allows a user to add or remove features of an email system to create a full-featured, individually customized email system.
In order to facilitate the disclosure of the present invention and corresponding preferred embodiment, the ensuing description is divided into sub-topics that focus on exemplary computing and hardware environments, registering user-defined commands, inbound server protocol, data processing operations, and outbound server protocol. This manner of employing sub-topics to facilitate the disclosure is for illustration purposes only and is not to be construed as limiting in any way. Furthermore, it will be appreciated from a review of the ensuing description that the present invention is not limited to the sub-topics employed, but rather includes a variety of aspects, as presented herein. Moreover, the scope of the present invention is to be indicated by the appended claims rather than by the ensuing description.
Embodiments of the present invention may comprise a special purpose or general-purpose computer including various computer hardware, as discussed in greater detail below, and may also include computer-readable media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combination of hardwired or wireless) to a computer, the computer properly views the connection as a computer-readable medium. Thus, any such a connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media. Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced in network computing environments with many types of computer system configurations, including personal computers, hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by local and remote processing devices that are linked (either by hardwired links, wireless links, or by a combination of hardwired or wireless links) through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
With reference to
The computer 20 may also include a magnetic hard disk drive 27 for reading from and writing to a magnetic hard disk 39, a magnetic disk drive 28 for reading from or writing to a removable magnetic disk 29, and an optical disk drive 30 for reading from or writing to removable optical disk 31 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media. The magnetic hard disk drive 27, magnetic disk drive 28, and optical disk drive 30 are connected to the system bus 23 by a hard disk drive interface 32, a magnetic disk drive-interface 33, and an optical drive interface 34, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-executable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 20. Although the exemplary environment described herein employs a magnetic hard disk 39, a removable magnetic disk 29 and a removable optical disk 31, other types of computer readable media for storing data can be used, including magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, Bernoulli cartridges, RAMs, ROMs, and the like.
Program code means comprising one or more program modules may be stored on the hard disk 39, magnetic disk 29, optical disk 31, ROM 24 or RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 36, other program modules 37, and program data 38. A user may enter commands and information into the computer 20 through keyboard 40, pointing device 42, or other input devices (not shown), such as a microphone, joy stick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 coupled to system bus 23. Alternatively, the input devices may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, a game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or another display device is also connected to system bus 23 via an interface, such as video adapter 48. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers.
The computer 20 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as remote computers 49 a and 49 b. Remote computers 49 a and 49 b may each be another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computer 20, although only memory storage devices 50 a and 50 b and their associated application programs 36 a and 36 b have been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 20 is connected to the local network 51 through a network interface or adapter 53. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 20 may include a modem 54, a wireless link, or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 52, such as the Internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 20, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing communications over wide area network 52 may be used.
Referring now to
In the basic configuration, as illustrated in
The transmission of data sequences 64 are performed under standard electronic mail transfer protocol as provided in RFC821, entitled “Simple Mail Transfer Protocol” (SMTP), which has the objective of transferring email in a reliable and efficient manner. While both the client and server employ SMTP, under the present invention an end-user of electronic mail can extend the SMTP to create user-defined commands that are recognizable and executable by an electronic mail system and that can alter the data processing performed after server 62 accepts a piece of electronic mail from client 60, as will be further explained below. Therefore, in this description and in the claims, the protocol utilized by a client is referred to as “outbound protocol” or “outbound client protocol” and includes the SMTP and any extensions of the SMTP. Similarly, in this description and in the claims, the protocol utilized by a server is referred to as “inbound protocol” or “inbound server protocol” and includes the SMTP and any extensions of the SMTP.
In the basic configuration illustrated in
Once the email message is transmitted from enterprise 70 to enterprise 72, the mail is relayed to its next destination or hop. The second exchange is between enterprises 72 and and is illustrated by data sequences 78. In this second exchange enterprise 72 functions as the client and employs outbound protocol to initiate a link to enterprise 74 and to transmit the email message. Enterprise 74 meanwhile functions as the server and employs inbound protocol to respond to the client.
Thus, in the example illustrated in
As mentioned above, under the present invention a full-featured, individually customized email system is created by allowing an end-user of the email system extend the SMTP for the creation of user-defined commands that are recognizable and executable by the email system and that can alter processing performed after a server accepts a piece of mail. An extension to the SMTP includes a user-defined command, such as, by way of example, X-FOO, and can be transmitted either before or after a standard SMTP command. However, in order for the user-defined command to be executed, the user-defined command must be registered and given a priority level for execution.
Every standard SMTP and user-defined command is given a priority level, and under the present invention a user can define or modify the level of priority for a given command. In accordance with RFC821, standard SMTP commands are given a neutral priority as a default, as illustrated by standard SMTP command 80 of
The execution of the commands is performed according to a priority scale—from highest priority to lowest priority. Therefore, user-defined commands can be set at a priority level higher than the priority level of a standard default command in order to augment the exchange or processing procedure, or to bypass the standard default command entirely. Similarly, the exchange or processing can also be augmented by a user-defined command being set at a priority level lower than the priority level of a standard default command.
Prior to setting the priority of a user-defined command, and in order for the user-defined command to be executed, the command must be registered in a database, such as an event-binding database. The database is a resource that includes all available operations for the exchange of information and processing of data. It includes the standard default commands and must include the user-defined commands in order for the user-defined commands to become available operations.
In step 92, the user-defined command generated in step 90 is added to the event-binding database. By including the user-defined command into the database, the command can be an accessible operation. Step 94 maps a specific handler to the user-defined command, the handler being a chain of events used to manipulate the user-defined command in a sequence prescribed by the end-user. In step 96, criteria for initiating the handler to manipulate the user-defined command is defined. Thus, upon creating the command, adding it to the event-binding database, mapping a handler to the command, and defining the criteria for initiating the handler, the user-defined command is registered and becomes an accessible operation for the customization of information exchange or data processing.
As provided above, inbound server protocol includes the SMTP and any extensions of the SMTP, and is utilized by a server in a client/server exchange relationship for communicating with the client and for receiving information sent from the client. Referring to
The client connects to a configured port of enterprise 100 via TCP/IP protocol. This connection is managed by SMTP inbound network protocol engine 104. Under the present invention, the inbound server protocol includes SMTP and extensions of SMTP to allow for the use and execution of standard default commands and user-defined commands.
As provided above, the standard default commands and the user-defined commands are registered in a database, such as event binding database 122 of
As a command is transmitted from the client to enterprise 100, the command is received by SMTP inbound protocol engine and is immediately handed off to protocol event dispatcher 120. This act of SMTP inbound protocol engine 104 handing off a command to protocol event dispatcher 120 is referred to as “raising an event.” The command is handed off to protocol event dispatcher 120 for the management of accessible operations.
All operations are registered in event-binding database 122, and protocol event dispatcher 120 manages the operations by determining which of the registered commands will be executed upon the raising of an event. The determination is made by protocol event dispatcher 120 consulting with event-binding database 122 at the time that an event is raised to determine if a user-defined command that corresponds to the raised event has been registered in the database. If a user-defined command has been registered then it is executed, otherwise the standard default command is executed, as will be further explained below.
Referring now to
In step 132 the client sends a command to the server as part of data sequences 102 of
As will be further explained below, if the command is a standard SMTP command or a recognizable user-defined command, then the command is handed off to the protocol event dispatcher, thereby raising an event and invoking the imminent execution of one or more corresponding commands that are registered in the event-binding database. Alternatively, if the command that is sent from the client to the server includes a handler that cannot be identified by the server (i.e. the command does not match with any entry in the event-binding database), then the server ignores the command and implements the “NULL handler” to generate an appropriate error string that is sent to the client.
The NULL handler catches everything that the server does not know how to handle and returns a generic “500 Unrecognized Command” error to the client. Within embodiments under the present invention, end-users can include user-defined handlers around the NULL handler, using different priorities, to customize special error handling behaviors. The inclusion of a user-defined handler is performed in the same way that a user-defined command is registered. In one embodiment, the command includes an asterisk (*) reserved in the binding database for user-defined NULL handlers.
Once step 134 raises the event, step 136 is followed, which includes protocol event dispatcher 120 of
Alternatively, if the determination at decision block 138 is that user-defined commands have been registered, then in step 142 the relevant user-commands are sorted by priority to prepare for the sequence in which they are to be executed. This presumes that more than one command exists in the database relative to the event raised. On the other hand, if only one command exists, the sorting process is trivial and execution proceeds to step 144.
In steps 144 through 152, each entry from the sorted list obtained from step 142 is processed individually. For each entry, step 144 queries event-binding database 122 of
If decision block 146 determines that a rule does not exist, then the handler is immediately implemented in step 148. Alternatively, if a rule is found to exist, then step 150 will gather all necessary data and evaluate the data against the rule. If decision block 152 finds that the data satisfies the rule, then the corresponding handler is implemented in step 148. Alternatively, if the data does not satisfy the rule, the handler is not implemented. Whether the handler is implemented or not, execution proceeds to decision block 154 for the determination as to whether or not there are more entries in the sorted list from step 142. If more entries exist, execution returns to step 144 so that steps 144–152 can be followed until all entries of the sorted list are processed.
At this point, whether the unrecognized command handler has been implemented in step 140 or the handlers that correspond to the user-defined commands have been implemented in step 148, execution proceeds to step 156 where a response is computed for the client. The response is sent to the client in step 158 and the server waits until the client sends another command to the server. Hence, according to an embodiment of the present invention, the inbound protocol allows an end-user to register user-defined commands and corresponding handlers in an event-binding database for the execution of the commands upon raising a relevant event. Thus, the ability to specify per-handler rules enables run-time decisions to be made to ensure the correct and logical operation of the server, and the coherency of the data involved. Furthermore, the ability to extend a rule to encompass any conditional statement or expression for yielding a value of either TRUE or FALSE upon evaluation of the rule, either respectively allows or disallows the implementation of the handler.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a refinement to the extension of the SMTP protocol is performed. This embodiment includes an asynchronous capability. When a client issues an authentication command, a “look up” is performed to determine if the authentication is valid. This “look up” can be very lengthy and therefore can hold up the connection. As a result, and according to the embodiment, an asynchronous framework allows the “look up” to be performed in such a way that all of the data relative to the authentication is gathered and queued into an asynchronous queue for transmitting the data to the client, thereby eliminating a potential obstruction in the communication.
Once the inbound protocol is used for the client/server communication, and the server receives the electronic mail message, the message undergoes a series of data processing operations within the enterprise. As part of the data processing operations of the present invention, transport events are raised that are specific to some point in the processing, and the manner in which the events are raised resemble the raising of events on the protocol side.
Under the present invention, user-defined commands can alter data processing operations that are performed. The data processing operations are performed on the electronic message after the message is received by the enterprise and until it is sent to a subsequent hop, in the event that the enterprise is not the ultimate destination.
Referring again to
Immediately following the MESSAGE ARRIVAL event, a PRE-CATEGORIZER event is raised. This PRE-CATEGORIZER event gives rise for the opportunity for user-defined commands to, for example, perform DL expansion, configure address translations such as looking up a forwarding address for email recipients, etc. As above, passing of the event to transport event dispatcher 124 raises the event, thereby causing transport event dispatcher 124 to consult event-binding database 122 for determining which corresponding commands and accompanying handlers will be executed.
The electronic message is next placed in categorizer 108, which looks up in a user database all of the sender and recipient addresses corresponding to the message for forwarding addresses and expanding distribution lists. Subsequently, various transport events are raised, thereby providing the opportunity for execution of registered commands. By way of example, the transport events can include BEGIN CATEGORIZATION, BUILD QUERY, BUILD QUERIES, SEND QUERY, SORT QUERY RESULT, PROCESS ITEM, EXPAND ITEM, COMPLETE ITEM, and/or END CATEGORIZATION.
After categorization, a POST-CATEGORIZER event is raised, which again allows for the execution of user-defined commands that may be registered in event-binding database 122, and the electronic message is inserted into a pre-routing queue. The pre-routing queue is part of routing module 110 of
Once the next destination has been determined in routing module 110, link manager 112 determines the schedule for creating a link with the subsequent enterprise. Once a link is scheduled, the link is given to connection manager 114 for the determination of the number of connections that need to be made with the subsequent enterprise. Connection manager 114 also requests SMTP outbound protocol engine 116 to initiate the required number of connections. The email is then transmitted to the next enterprise, as indicated by data sequences 118.
Thus, according to an embodiment of the present invention, within an enterprise an email message is passed from the SMTP inbound protocol engine 104, to the SMTP outbound protocol engine 116 via queuing module 106, categorizer 108, routing module 110, link manager 112, and connection manager 114, respectively. Throughout the passing of the message, transport events are routinely raised to yield opportunities for registered user-defined commands to be executed for the altering of the data processing performed. The events are raised to the transport event dispatcher 124, which manages the execution of commands registered in event-binding database 122 that alter the processing of data. Store driver 126 powers the transport event dispatcher 124. Once the communication link is scheduled with the subsequent enterprise for the transmission of the email message, SMTP outbound protocol engine 116 establishes the connection and transmits the email message to the subsequent enterprise, as illustrated in
As mentioned, outbound client protocol includes SMTP and SMTP extensions and is utilized by an enterprise (client) that is transmitting information. Referring now to
Once SMTP outbound protocol engine 116 of
Decision block 170 determines if there exists another recipient for the email message. If there is another recipient, execution returns to step 168 to raise the PER RECIPIENT event. Alternatively if there is not another recipient, execution proceeds to step 172 to raise the DATA OR BDAT event. Decision 174 then determines whether or not all of the messages have been forwarded. If all of the messages have not been forwarded, execution returns to step 166 in order that the MESSAGE START EVENT, the PER RECIPIENT event, and the DATA OR BDAT event are raised for each electronic message transferred during the session with the server. Once decision block 174 has determined that all of the electronic messages have been transferred, or that the electronic message has been transmitted to all recipients, execution proceeds to step 176 where a SESSION END event is raised for the conclusion of information exchange, before the session is terminated in step 178 so that handlers can still converse with the server before the session is dropped.
The present invention is presented by the foregoing embodiments that allow end-users of an electronic mail system to extend standard electronic mail protocol for the creation of user-defined commands that are recognizable and executable by an electronic mail system and that can alter processing performed after a server accepts a piece of electronic mail to thereby create a full-featured, individually customized email system. The present invention may also be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5796394 *||Sep 23, 1997||Aug 18, 1998||Sony Corporation||User interface and rule processing for a personal communications routing system|
|US5826269 *||Jun 21, 1995||Oct 20, 1998||Microsoft Corporation||Electronic mail interface for a network server|
|US5917489 *||Jan 31, 1997||Jun 29, 1999||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for creating, editing, and distributing rules for processing electronic messages|
|US6073142 *||Jun 23, 1997||Jun 6, 2000||Park City Group||Automated post office based rule analysis of e-mail messages and other data objects for controlled distribution in network environments|
|US6199102 *||Aug 26, 1997||Mar 6, 2001||Christopher Alan Cobb||Method and system for filtering electronic messages|
|US6212535 *||Sep 19, 1996||Apr 3, 2001||Digital Equipment Corporation||Browser-based electronic messaging|
|US6363415 *||Aug 11, 2000||Mar 26, 2002||Cranberry Properties Llc||System and method for distributing electronic messages in accordance with rules|
|US6438545 *||Apr 15, 1999||Aug 20, 2002||Value Capital Management||Semantic user interface|
|US20020099681 *||Nov 17, 1998||Jul 25, 2002||Mark Gainey||Method and apparatus for performing enterprise email management|
|1||Crocker, David H., FRC 822, "Standard For The Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages," Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Delaware, Aug. 13, 1982.|
|2||Postel, Jonathan B., RFC 821, "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol," Information Sciences Institute, Aug. 1982.|
|3||*||Stephen Polluck, A Rule-Based Message Filtering System, Jul. 1998, ACM Transactions On Office Information Systems, vol. 6, pp. 232-254.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7269624 *||Dec 20, 2000||Sep 11, 2007||At&T Bls Intellectual Property, Inc.||Method and apparatus for dynamically managing electronic mail messages on a remote electronic mail messaging system|
|US7308478 *||Sep 25, 2002||Dec 11, 2007||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Communication terminal, server unit, mail incoming notification method and system, and mail sending and receiving method|
|US7849056||Dec 7, 2010||Research In Motion Limited||System and method for managing databases associated with respective personal information manager service accounts|
|US7870228 *||Jan 11, 2011||Research In Motion Limited||System and method for remotely controlling mobile communication devices|
|US8447817 *||Feb 20, 2009||May 21, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Associating multiple physical mailboxes with same user object in messaging system|
|US8533311||Jul 13, 2010||Sep 10, 2013||Research In Motion Limited||System and method for remotely controlling mobile communication devices|
|US8612403||Dec 29, 2006||Dec 17, 2013||Uniforce Tech Limited Liability Company||Method and system for providing contact specific delivery reports|
|US8615554 *||Apr 16, 2008||Dec 24, 2013||United Services Automobile Association (Usaa)||Electronic mail delivery physical delivery backup|
|US8819156||Mar 8, 2012||Aug 26, 2014||James Robert Miner||Systems and methods for message collection|
|US9002328 *||Sep 30, 2004||Apr 7, 2015||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||Electronic calendar for automatically scheduling a plurality of events based on a scheduling request and obtained additional information|
|US9307443 *||Aug 23, 2013||Apr 5, 2016||Blackberry Limited||System and method for remotely controlling mobile communication devices|
|US20030088633 *||Oct 28, 2002||May 8, 2003||Chiu Denny K.||System and method for remotely controlling mobile communication devices|
|US20030143983 *||Mar 16, 2001||Jul 31, 2003||Les Crampton||Email alert device and method|
|US20040059787 *||Sep 25, 2002||Mar 25, 2004||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Communication terminal, server unit, mail incoming notification method and system, and mail sending and receiving method|
|US20060041460 *||Sep 30, 2004||Feb 23, 2006||Aaron Jeffrey A||An electronic calendar|
|US20070156494 *||Jan 5, 2006||Jul 5, 2007||Ibm Corporation||System and method for providing profile enhancement using scheduling information|
|US20070299926 *||Sep 7, 2007||Dec 27, 2007||At&T Bls Intellectual Property, Inc., Formerly Known As Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporati||Method and Apparatus for Dynamically Managing Electronic Mail Messages on a Remote Electronic Mail Messaging System|
|US20080162645 *||Dec 29, 2006||Jul 3, 2008||Nokia Corporation||Method and System for Providing Contact Specific Delivery Reports|
|US20080186807 *||Feb 2, 2007||Aug 7, 2008||Research In Motion Limited||Electronic device and method of controlling an electronic device for calendar event updates|
|US20080189159 *||Feb 2, 2007||Aug 7, 2008||Researech In Motion Limited||Electronic device and method of meeting notification|
|US20080191896 *||Feb 9, 2007||Aug 14, 2008||Jain Rohit Rocky||Electronic device and method of adding parties to a calendar event|
|US20080195455 *||Feb 9, 2007||Aug 14, 2008||Research In Motion Limited||Electronic device and method of scheduling calendar events|
|US20080195619 *||Feb 9, 2007||Aug 14, 2008||Jain Rohit Rocky||Electronic device and method of sharing calendar-event information|
|US20080195627 *||Feb 9, 2007||Aug 14, 2008||Research In Motion Limited||System and method for managing databases associated with respective personal information manager service accounts|
|US20100217805 *||Aug 26, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Associating multiple physical mailboxes with same user object in messaging system|
|US20100281153 *||Nov 4, 2010||Research In Motion Limited||System and method for remotely controlling mobile communication devices|
|US20110231496 *||Sep 22, 2011||About, Inc.||Method and apparatus for delivering customized information according to a user's profile|
|US20130080554 *||Mar 28, 2013||Frank Addante||Systems and methods for communicating logic in e-mail messages|
|US20130346579 *||Aug 23, 2013||Dec 26, 2013||Blackberry Limited||System and method for remotely controlling mobile communication devices|
|US20150081372 *||Nov 21, 2014||Mar 19, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for providing profile enhancement using scheduling information|
|WO2008081289A1 *||Dec 26, 2007||Jul 10, 2008||Nokia Corp.||Method and system for providing contact specific delivery reports|
|U.S. Classification||709/207, 709/224|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L67/2823, H04L51/14, H04L12/5855|
|European Classification||H04L51/14, H04L12/58G, H04L29/08N27F|
|Feb 28, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHAH, MILAN M.;LAU, KEITH K.;STAMERJOHN, JEFFREY C.;REEL/FRAME:010582/0583;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000216 TO 20000223
|Jul 15, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 22, 2009||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Mar 18, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Dec 9, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034541/0001
Effective date: 20141014