|Publication number||US7774754 B2|
|Application number||US 11/475,769|
|Publication date||Aug 10, 2010|
|Priority date||Feb 25, 2004|
|Also published as||US20070038976|
|Publication number||11475769, 475769, US 7774754 B2, US 7774754B2, US-B2-7774754, US7774754 B2, US7774754B2|
|Inventors||Konstantin Komissarchik, Robert Woollen, Theodore Bashor|
|Original Assignee||Bea Systems, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (17), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (3), Classifications (5), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING A SPLIT-DIRECTORY STRUCTURE FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT”, application Ser. No. 10/786,748, filed Feb. 25, 2004. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT USING VIRTUAL PATH MAPPING”, Application No. 60/740,797, filed Nov. 30, 2005; both of which applications are incorporated herein by reference.
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The invention relates generally to software development, and particularly to a split-directory structure for software development, wherein the split-source directory structure also supports an abstraction layer that allows a physical file location to be mapped to a virtual location.
The J2EE specification defines the Enterprise Archive (EAR) file as a standard structure for developing and packaging J2EE applications. EARs are useful for application development, in that the application may, for example, include both a Web application (Webapp) and an Enterprise Java Bean (EJB), which will be packaged into the EAR. However, while this works well for completed applications, it isn't very convenient for application development.
In a typical application server development environment that uses EARs, a build structure similar to that shown in
To deploy the application, a number of steps must be performed, namely compiling the Java files, generating any servlets or container classes, and packaging the whole lot in an EAR. The EAR adheres to a format wherein the top level includes an EAR descriptor/META-INF/application.xml, and all of the other components are listed underneath. This approach works well when the application has been fully completed and ready for installation in the production environment. However it's less useful for application development.
A problem with the traditional approach is that the developer will usually have both the source files and system-generated output in the same directory, which can be confusing. It is also difficult to generate a clean build of the application since it is difficult to delete only the system-generated files.
In addition, it is desirable to provide a flexible means by which the actual build structure can be laid out. For example, in a traditional system the build structure must usually mirror the corresponding EAR structure. However, in some instances the developer may wish to use a different build structure. A mechanism that allows application development while maintaining some separation between the user-coded and system-generated files, together with providing flexibility in how the build structure can be laid out, would be useful in addressing these problems.
An embodiment of the invention provides a development-oriented split-source directory structure, that can be used with an application server and which solves a number of the problems associated with traditional Enterprise Archive (EAR) files. In particular, the split-source directory structure avoids the copying of files during the build process, and presents a clean separation between human-readable source files stored in a source control system and generated java class files. The two directories (source and output) appear like a single application. In addition, the split-source directory structure supports an abstraction layer and mappings that allow a physical file location to be mapped to a virtual location. In this manner, the system provides flexibility in how the build structure can be laid out for a particular application development.
An embodiment of the invention provides a development-oriented split-source directory structure, that can be used with an application server (for example the WebLogic Server from BEA Systems, Inc.), and which solves a number of the problems associated with traditional Enterprise Archive (EAR) files. In particular, the split-source directory structure avoids the copying of files during the build process, and presents a clean separation between human-readable source files stored in a source control system and generated java class files. The two directories (source and output) appear like a single application. In addition, the split-source directory structure supports mappings that allow a physical file location to be mapped to a virtual location. In this manner, the system provides flexibility in how the build structure can be laid out for a particular application development.
In a traditional software development system, use is made of a separate source directory (/source) for storing source code, typically under management or control of a source control system, and a build directory (/build) into which Java files, etc, are compiled. Each time a change is made to a small portion of the code, it's necessary to do a full redeployment. The server receiving the build only sees the /build directory, and not the /source directory. Besides being inelegant, this approach prevents the use of Web-editing-in-place of the source code so as to immediately see the effect of changes to the underlying source.
The solution provided by an embodiment of the invention is to provide a split-directory structure, and modify the server so that it can see both the /source and the /build directories. In addition, an abstraction layer and mappings allow a physical file location to be mapped to a virtual location.
The split-directory system provides a recommended directory layout and an accompanying set of ant tasks for building and deploying applications. The split-directory differs from traditional EAR files because it is optimized for iterative development. Instead of a single archived EAR file or an “exploded” EAR directory structure, the split-directory has 2 parallel directories. The source directory contains all of the source files e.g. java files, descriptors, JSP files, HTML etc in a traditional EAR-like directory structure. All generated or compiled classes are stored in a separate output directory. This arrangement produces several advantages over the traditional exploded EAR file:
1. No need for file copying.
2. Web files can be changed and redeployed in place without rebuilding.
3. Clean separation between source and generated files allows cleaning the build by just removing the output directory.
Server Support for Split-Directory
The user specifies the output directory when deploying the application to the server. The server automatically recognizes the deployment as a split-directory and uses information in the output directory to locate the source directory. The Server views the application as a union of the source and output directories. When the server searches for a resource or class, it first checks the source directory. If the class or resource is not found, it then checks the output directory.
When the application is finally deployed, the split-directory appears just as it did using traditional source control. In accordance with one embodiment, the output directory includes a file (build.txt, or in some instances referred to as .beabuild.txt) the content of which indicates that the output directory is in fact an output directory of a corresponding source directory. In this way, other application can be pointed to the appropriate output directory and can still access the source directory when necessary.
In accordance with one embodiment, the split directory feature can be provided through an abstraction in the server called a virtual JAR file. The virtual JAR file provides an abstraction over the two split directories. When a request is made to the JAR to retrieve e.g. a/b.jar, the virtual JAR checks the /source directory, then checks the /output directory.
wlcompile is the main build task which compiles the application's java files. wlcompile begins by analyzing all of the components and determining their type. It treats components as either EJBs, Web applications, or Java components. Java components are compiled first into the output directory/APP-INF/classes so they will be visible throughout the application. Next, wlcompile builds the EJBs and automatically includes the previously built java components in the compiler's classpath. This allows the EJB components to call the java components without requiring the user to manually edit their classpath. Finally the .java files in the webapp are compiled with the EJB components and java components in the compiler's classpath. This allows the Web Applications to refer to the EJB and application java classes without manually editing the classpath. The following example compiles the application with sources in /acme/myapp to output directory /build/myapp:
<wlcompile srcdir=“/acme/myapp” destdir=“/build/myapp” />
By default wlcompile builds the entire application. It is also possible to instruct wlcompile to build a single component. This is especially useful when developing large applications where the developer is making isolated changes and wants a faster build. When wlcompile builds a single component, it only rebuilds that component. wlcompile does not track dependencies between components so it will not rebuild any other components which depend on the rebuilt component. The following example builds only the AcmeEJB component:
<wlcompile srcdir=“/acme/myapp” destdir=“/build/myapp”
As shown in the example above, wlcompile automatically guesses the type of each component in the application. In general, this guessing works well, but in some cases, especially when components are incomplete, wlcompile cannot accurately determine the type.
The common case where wlcompile fails is when an EJB is being developed. Users will typically compile their java files first, get this working, and then write their deployment descriptors. wlcompile is unable to determine that this component is an EJB when it does not have descriptors yet. wlcompile allows users to specify a component's type in cases where the guessing is not correct. The following example builds only the AcmeEJB component and hardcodes it to be an EJB:
<wlcompile srcdir=“/acme/myapp” destdir=“/build/myapp”>
<component name=“AcmeEJB” type=“EJB” />
Exclude lists may also be specified, so as to build everything but a few portions of the application.
<wldeploy user=“system” password=“gumby1234” action=“deploy” source=“/build/myapp” />
The following examples package split-directory myapp as a traditional EAR file:
<wlpackage toFile=“/acme/App.ear” srcdir=“/acme/myapp” destdir=“/build/myapp” /> <wlpackage toDir=“/acme/explodedEar” srcdir=“/acme/myapp” destdir=“/build/myapp” />
Split Directory Recipes
The webapp source is contained within a directory (AcmeWeb). As usual, the descriptors are in the WEB-INF directory. The WEB-INF/src directory is a place for java classes such as servlets which will be compiled to the WEB-INF/classes directory. JSP files, HTML, and other web files are contained under the directory root.
The ejbapp source is contained within a directory (AcmeEJB). As usual, the descriptors are in the META-INF directory. Any java files under the AcmeEJB root directory are compiled into the output directory.
Application with webapp and ejb
This example shows an Inventory application which is made up of an EJB (AcmeEJB) and a webapp (AcmeWeb). The application's descriptors are contained in the META-INF/directory as usual. The application components, AcmeEJB and AcmeWeb, are contained in directories directly under the InventoryApp.
Third-Party Jar Files
This example demonstrates how the Inventory Application can be extended to use third-party jar files. Third-party jar files are jar files that are packaged with the application, but are usually not the develoer's own code, and are not recompiled. For instance, XML parsers, logging implementations, and other utility jar files are common. These files may be placed in the APP-INF/lib/subdirectory. They will be visible throughout the application.
Java Utility Classes
This example demonstrates how the Inventory Application can be extended to use java utility classes. Java Utility classes differ from third-party jars because the source files are part of the application and must be compiled. Java Utility classes are typically libraries used by application components such as EJBs or webapps. The build process compiles these files into the APP-INF/classes directory under the output directory. These classes are avaliable throughout the application.
EJB Using EJBGen
The ejbapp source is contained within a directory (AcmeEJB). The EJBGen source file must have a .ejb extension. The build system runs EJBGen on this file creating the java sources and descriptors in the output directory. Any java files in the source directory will be compiled as usual to the output directory.
Virtual Path Mapping
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, virtual path mapping of directories is provided to allow greater flexibility in using the split-source functionality. In an application server (for example, WebLogic Server), each of the deployment tools (for example, weblogic.Deployer, wldeploy, and the Administration Console) can support direct deployment from a split-source development directory. In this case, the developer need specify only the build directory when deploying the application to the server. In WebLogic Server, the server attempts to use all classes and resources available in the source directory for deploying the application. If a required resource is not available in the source directory, the server then looks in the application's build directory for that resource. For example, if a deployment descriptor is generated during the build process, rather than stored with source code as an editable file, then the server obtains the generated file from the build directory. The server discovers the location of the source directory by examining a .beabuild.txt file that resides in the top level of the application's build directory. If the developer moves or modifies the source directory location, they can edit the .beabuild.txt file to identify the new source directory name.
One of the problems with the standard split-source approach, is that it assumes that the source directory structure and the output directory structure will appear similar to the EAR structure. However, in some instances this is not the case. To allow for this, in accordance with an embodiment, the .beabuild.txt file is instead a list of path mappings from a physical location to a virtual one, relative to the location of the .beabuild.txt file. This provides greater flexibility in using the split-source functionality.
Since it is possible that multiple files with the same name will be mapped into the same location, the system also needs a path resolution strategy. In accordance with an embodiment, the resolution strategy provides that the physical location (i.e. where the .beabuild.txt file is located) always wins; after that, resolution is performed strictly by the ordering of the entries in the .beabuild.txt file.
The advantages of the virtual path mapping include that it supports an arbitrary number of locations; and can map a path into an arbitrary point in the Virtual Exploded EAR, not just the root. This allows that the build structure does not have to mirror the EAR structure. Both of these features allow the software greater flexibility in how the build structure is laid out.
The following is an example of a virtual path mapping in a MyApp application:
c:\oracle\lib\oracle123.jar = APP-INF\lib\oracle123.jar
c:\myapp\JavaProj\src = APP-INF\lib\JavaProj.jar
c:\myapp\JavaProj\classes = APP-INF\lib\JavaProj.jar
c:\myapp\WebApp\web = WebApp
c:\myapp\WebApp\classes = WebApp\WEB-INF\classes
c:\some\other\project\TraderEJB.jar = FooEJB.jar
The following is an example of the application.xml in the exploded EAR that these mappings could then be used for:
The present invention may be conveniently implemented using a conventional general purpose or a specialized digital computer or microprocessor programmed according to the teachings of the present disclosure. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the software art.
In some embodiments, the present invention includes a computer program product which is a storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the present invention. The storage medium can include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical discs, DVD, CD-ROMs, microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, DRAMs, VRAMs, flash memory devices, magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.
The foregoing description of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. Particularly, it will be evident that while the examples described herein illustrate how the features may be used in a WebLogic environment, other application servers, computing environments, and software development systems may use and benefit from the invention. The code examples given are presented for purposes of illustration. It will be evident that the techniques described herein may be applied using other code languages, and with different code.
The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalence.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5812849||Dec 18, 1996||Sep 22, 1998||Chrysler Corporation||Software redevelopment system|
|US5999741||Jun 30, 1998||Dec 7, 1999||Hewlett-Packard Company||Remote installation of software on a computing device|
|US6003042||Sep 30, 1997||Dec 14, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Systems, methods and computer programs products for storing a new version of an Envy Library file in a teamconnection object oriented programming environment|
|US6023271||Jun 11, 1998||Feb 8, 2000||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Framework for binding data viewers/data manipulation with one to many objects through introspection|
|US6064382||Nov 19, 1997||May 16, 2000||International Business Machines Corporation||Object oriented apparatus and method for providing a graphical user interface for host-based software applications|
|US6112024||Oct 2, 1996||Aug 29, 2000||Sybase, Inc.||Development system providing methods for managing different versions of objects with a meta model|
|US6202207||Aug 19, 1998||Mar 13, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and a mechanism for synchronized updating of interoperating software|
|US6301590||Aug 11, 1997||Oct 9, 2001||Viador||Method and apparatus for formatting and displaying data from the internet|
|US6473894||Jan 29, 1999||Oct 29, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Dynamic runtime and test architecture for Java applets|
|US6779177||Oct 28, 1999||Aug 17, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Mechanism for cross channel multi-server multi-protocol multi-data model thin clients|
|US6892382||May 3, 2000||May 10, 2005||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for implementing deployment descriptors in an enterprise environment|
|US6986135||Sep 6, 2001||Jan 10, 2006||Cognos Incorporated||Deployment manager for organizing and deploying an application in a distributed computing environment|
|US7246352 *||Jul 24, 2002||Jul 17, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||System for generating a virtual map to a plurality of files necessary for installing software from multiple networked locations|
|US7412700 *||May 18, 2004||Aug 12, 2008||Oracle International Corporation||Product packaging and installation mechanism|
|US7503034 *||Oct 31, 2002||Mar 10, 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for dynamically mapping archive files in an enterprise application|
|US20030101245||Nov 26, 2001||May 29, 2003||Arvind Srinivasan||Dynamic reconfiguration of applications on a server|
|US20070006152 *||Jun 29, 2005||Jan 4, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Software source asset management|
|1||*||Singh, Inderjeet et al., "Designing Enterprise Applications with the J2EE(TM) Platform, Second Edition," 2002, pp. 201-250.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8627269 *||Jun 10, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||Adobe Systems Incorporated||Runtime library including a virtual file system|
|US8924931 *||Aug 30, 2007||Dec 30, 2014||Serena Software, Inc.||Method and system for determining dependencies in a mainframe development environment|
|US20080059946 *||Aug 30, 2007||Mar 6, 2008||Jeremy Harding||Method and system for determining dependencies in a mainframe development environment|
|U.S. Classification||717/120, 717/175|
|Oct 30, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BEA SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KOMISSARCHIK, KONSTANTIN;WOOLLEN, ROBERT;BASHOR, THEODORE;REEL/FRAME:018462/0651;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060806 TO 20061023
Owner name: BEA SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KOMISSARCHIK, KONSTANTIN;WOOLLEN, ROBERT;BASHOR, THEODORE;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060806 TO 20061023;REEL/FRAME:018462/0651
|Oct 15, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BEA SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025192/0244
Effective date: 20101008
|May 17, 2011||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jan 15, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4