I have heard many people comment that they don't like vector graphics. As I understand it, screen-printing results in essentially a digital format; either a square in the mesh is filled or it's not, creating a sawtooth edge as in digital work. Is that correct or am I mistaken?
Some people say they like the analogue look and create their posters in that way, but I am confused because it seems there is no way to tell if a poster image was made by analogue or digital, because of the reason given above about the screen mesh. Perhaps it is the working methods often taken in a vector program that makes the difference, for example using circle tools, or smooth curve tools. But if one scans a hand drawn picture, and then they trace it in a vector program, does it become indistinguishable from analogue methods using screen print?
I'm interested in creating images in different sizes, for posters, mugs, t-shits etc, so vector seems the way to go, but is there other ways to make these things (lithograph etc.) that looks more beautiful in your opinion, even if it's applicable to only one medium, such as posters. If so, please explain why.