|Publication number||US6696060 B2|
|Application number||US 09/880,052|
|Publication date||Feb 24, 2004|
|Filing date||Jun 14, 2001|
|Priority date||Jun 14, 2001|
|Also published as||CA2450730A1, CN1541110A, EP1425041A2, US20030012779, US20040249135, US20050202003, WO2002103029A2, WO2002103029A3|
|Publication number||09880052, 880052, US 6696060 B2, US 6696060B2, US-B2-6696060, US6696060 B2, US6696060B2|
|Inventors||Teri Grieb, Wilson H. Burgess, William N. Drohan, Ren-Yo Forng, Martin J. MacPhee, David M. Mann, Anna McBain|
|Original Assignee||Clearant, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (93), Non-Patent Citations (188), Referenced by (14), Classifications (32), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to methods for sterilizing preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins to reduce the level of active biological contaminants therein, such as viruses, bacteria, yeasts, molds, mycoplasmas, prions and/or parasites.
Antibodies are produced by organisms in response to exposure to foreign substances that the body perceives as a threat. Antibodies, or as they are collectively known, immunoglobulins (Ig), are proteins secreted by cells of the immune system known as B-cells or plasma cells. The structure of immunoglobulins is complex, but is well characterized. In brief, each immunoglobulin consists of a complex of protein chains known as the heavy and light chains. Each heavy chain is linked to a single light chain via disulfide bonds. The resulting complex is in turn linked by additional disulfide bonds to an identical heavy-light chain complex. This basic unit can be assembled by the cell into several specialized forms by varying the structure and number of heavy chains. Different heavy chain structures produce differing molecules, known as “classes” of immunoglobulins. These classes may also have different numbers of the basic units described above.
The production of these various physical forms of the immunoglobulin molecule occurs in a sequential manner. During this process, the specificity of the molecule for a single molecule or antigen remains unchanged. This is because the changes described above all occur to the portion of the immunoglobulin molecule that is not involved in determining the specificity of the particular immunoglobulin molecule. This “hypervariable region” is subject to an unusually high degree of recombination events during B-cell maturation. These recombination events cease prior to the production of the first immunoglobulin molecule by the cell. The result is that from a relatively small number of variable region genes, the body generates a large number of potential immunoglobulin molecules of differing specificities.
Once a B-cell encounters a molecule to which its own immunoglobulin molecule binds (an “antigen”), and upon receiving signals from other cells in the immune system, the B-cell first multiplies into a large number of identical cells, (collectively referred to as a clone) and then differentiates into an immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cell. In this way, the extremely large number of potential immunoglobulin molecules that might be manufactured is limited to only those molecules that recognize antigens to which the body must respond.
The vast array of immunoglobulin specificities that are produced results in an ongoing protection for the body against infection from those organisms that the body has made immunoglobulins against in the past. Taken in sum, the result is that the immunoglobulins contained in the plasma from a single donor may have millions of useful immunoglobulin specificities. A preparation of immunoglobulins from plasma is thus referred to as a polyclonal immunoglobulin preparation, since it contains the immunoglobulin molecules produced by all of the plasma cell clones in the body.
Polyclonal immunoglobulins are particularly useful for treating human disease in which the ability to produce Ig is absent or impaired. Since all plasma cell clones are affected, a mixture of all the immunoglobulin specificities found in the plasma is needed to correct the deficiency. In contrast, when an extreme degree of specificity is required, or when a single defined therapeutic goal is sought, polyclonal immunoglobulins are not the best solution. Instead, an immunoglobulin preparation consisting of the immunoglobulin molecules produced by a single clone with the desired specificity is the most precise and predictable solution. Such a preparation is known as a monoclonal immunoglobulin.
Monoclonal immunoglobulin have many differences as compared to polyclonal immunoglobulins. Their monospecificity makes them very precise when used as detection reagents. As therapeutics, they are free of confounding or dangerous side effects that arise from polyclonal immunoglobulin preparations, such as the introduction of immunoglobulins of unwanted specificities being introduced into the patient. Their physical characteristics may also be different. Since each monoclonal immunoglobulin has a unique and unvarying structure, its potential for stability, degradation, aggregation, temperature sensitivity and other characteristics are unique and unchanging. Once a suitable monoclonal immunoglobulin has been chosen for production, its characteristics will not change, and it thus can be manufactured with great consistency and assurance of its performance and storage characteristics. The ability to tailor production volumes to product requirements also makes monoclonal immunoglobulin a highly desirable alternative to polyclonal immunoglobulins.
Monoclonal immunoglobulin preparations are made in one of three general fashions. The first involves production in a cell culture system, the second uses an animal as a temporary bioreactor for monoclonal immunoglobulin production, and the third involves inserting the gene for a desired monoclonal immunoglobulin into an animal in such a manner as to induce continuous production of the monoclonal immunoglobulin into a fluid or tissue of the animal so that it can be continuously harvested (transgenic production).
Each of these methods may result in contamination of the product by pathogens. In the first method, the cells producing the monoclonal immunoglobulin may harbour undetected viruses that can be produced in the culture system. Contamination of the culture system by bacteria, yeast or mold may also occur.
Both of the remaining methods involve the use of an animal to either serve as a host for the monoclonal immunoglobulin-producing cells or as a bioreactor to manufacture the monoclonal immunoglobulin product itself. Obviously, these products face the risk of contamination by pathogens infecting or harboured by the host animal. Such pathogens include, viruses, bacteria, yeasts, molds, mycoplasmas, and parasites, among others.
Consequently, it is of utmost importance that any biologically active contaminant in the monoclonal immunoglobulin product be inactivated before the product is used. This is especially critical when the product is to be administered directly to a patient. This is also critical for various monoclonal immunoglobulin products which are prepared in media which contain various types of plasma and which may be subject to mycoplasma or other viral contaminants.
Previously, most procedures have involved methods that screen or test products for a particular contaminant rather than removal or inactivation of the contaminant from the product. Products that test positive for a contaminant are merely not used. Examples of screening procedures include the testing for a particular virus in human blood from blood donors. Such procedures, however, are not always reliable and are not able to detect the presence of viruses in very low numbers. This reduces the value or certainty of the test in view of the consequences associated with a false negative result. False negative results can be life threatening in certain cases, for example in the case of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Furthermore, in some instances it can take weeks, if not months, to determine whether or not the product is contaminated.
In conducting experiments to determine the ability of technologies to inactivate viruses, the actual viruses of concern are seldom utilized. This is a result of safety concerns for the workers conducting the tests, and the difficulty and expense associated with the containment facilities and waste disposal. In their place, model viruses of the same family and class are used.
In general, it is acknowledged that the most difficult viruses to inactivate are those with an outer shell made up of proteins, and that among these, the most difficult to inactivate are those of the smallest size. This has been shown to be true for gamma irradiation and most other forms of radiation as these viruses diminutive size is a consequence of their small genome. The magnitude of direct effects of radiation upon a molecule are directly proportional to the size of the molecule, that is the larger the target molecule, the greater the effect. As a corollary, it has been shown for gamma-irradiation that the smaller the viral genome, the higher the radiation dose required to inactive it.
Among the viruses of concern for both human and animal-derived biologics, the smallest viruses of concern belong to the family of Parvoviruses and the slightly larger protein-coated Hepatitis virus. In humans, the Parvovirus B19, and Hepatitis A are the agents of concern. In porcine-derived products and tissues, the smallest corresponding virus is Porcine Parvovirus. Since this virus is harmless to humans, it is frequently chosen as a model virus for the human B19 Parvovirus and Hepatitis A. The demonstration of inactivation of this model parvovirus is considered adequate proof that the method employed will kill human B19 virus and Hepatitis A, and by extension, that it will also kill the larger and less hardy viruses such as HIV, CMV, Hepatitis B and C and others.
More recent efforts have focused on methods to remove or inactivate contaminants in the products. Such methods include heat treating, filtration and the addition of chemical inactivants or sensitizers to the product. Heat treatment requires that the product be heated to approximately 60° C. for about 70 hours which can be damaging to sensitive products. Heat inactivation can destroy 50% or more of the biological activity of the product. Filtration involves filtering the product in order to physically remove contaminants. Unfortunately this method may also remove products that have a high molecular weight. Further, in certain cases small viruses may not be removed by the filter because of the larger molecular structure of the product. The procedure of chemical sensitization involves the addition of noxious agents which bind to the DNA/RNA of the virus and which are activated either by UV or radiation to produce reactive intermediates and/or free radicals which bind to the DNA/RNA or break the chemical bonds in the backbone of the DNA/RNA of the virus or crosslink or complex it in such a way that the virus can no longer replicate. This procedure requires that unbound sensitizer is washed from products since the sensitizers are toxic, if not mutagenic or carcinogenic, and can not be administered to a patient.
Irradiating a product with gamma radiation is another method of sterilizing a product. Gamma radiation is effective in destroying viruses and bacteria when given in high total doses (Keathly et al., “Is There Life After Irradiation? Part 2,” BioPharm July-August, 1993, and Leitman, Use of Blood Cell Irradiation in the Prevention of Post Transfusion Graft-vs-Host Disease,” Transfusion Science 10:219-239 (1989)). The published literature in this area, however, teaches that gamma radiation can be damaging to radiation sensitive products, such as blood, blood products, protein and protein-containing products. In particular, it has been shown that high radiation doses are injurious to red cells, platelets and granulocytes (Leitman). U.S. Pat. No. 4,620,908 discloses that protein products must be frozen prior to irradiation in order to maintain the viability of the protein product. This patent concludes that “[i]f the gamma irradiation were applied while the protein material was at, for example, ambient temperature, the material would be also completely destroyed, that is the activity of the material would be rendered so low as to be virtually ineffective”. This would apply as well to monoclonal immunoglobulins which are, of course, proteins. Unfortunately, many sensitive biologicals, such as monoclonal antibodies (Mab), would lose viability and activity if subjected to freezing for irradiation purposes and then thawing prior to administration to a patient.
In view of the difficulties discussed above, there remains a need for methods of sterilizing monoclonal immunoglobulins that are effective for reducing the level of active biological contaminants without an adverse effect on the monoclonal immunoglobulins.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide methods of sterilizing preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins by reducing the level of active biological contaminants without adversely affecting the monoclonal immunoglobulins. Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be set forth in the detailed description of preferred embodiments that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description or may be learned by practice of the invention. These objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the compositions and methods particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof.
In accordance with these and other objects, a first embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for sterilizing a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that is sensitive to radiation comprising: (i) reducing the residual solvent content of a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins to a level effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; and (ii) irradiating the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins with radiation at an effective rate for a time effective to sterilize the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins.
A second embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for sterilizing a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that is sensitive to radiation comprising: (i) adding to a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins at least one stabilizer in an amount effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; and (ii) irradiating the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins with radiation at an effective rate for a time effective to sterilize the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins.
A third embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for sterilizing a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that is sensitive to radiation comprising: (i) reducing the residual solvent content of a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins to a level effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; (ii) adding to the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins at least one stabilizer in an amount effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; and (iii) irradiating the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins with radiation at an effective rate for a time effective to sterilize the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. According to this embodiment, steps (i) and (ii) may be reversed.
The invention also provides a composition comprising at least one monoclonal immunoglobulin and a least one stabilizer selected from the group consisting of: ascorbic acid or a salt or ester thereof; glutathione; 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid; uric acid or a salt or ester thereof; methionine; histidine; N-acetyl cysteine; the dipeptide glycine-glycine; diosmin; silymarin; a mixture of ascorbic acid, or a salt or ester thereof, and uric acid, or a salt or ester thereof; a mixture of ascorbic acid, or a salt or ester thereof, and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid; a mixture of ascorbic acid, or a salt or ester thereof, uric acid, or a salt or ester thereof, and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid; and a mixture of uric acid, or a salt or ester thereof and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid, said at least one stabilizer being present in an amount effective to preserve said monoclonal immunoglobulin for its intended use following sterilization of the composition with radiation.
FIGS. 1 and 2 are graphs showing the protective effects of certain stabilizers on lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin exposed to 45 kGy of low dose gamma irradiation.
FIGS. 3A-3C are graphs showing the protective effects of certain stabilizers on lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin exposed to 45 kGy of low dose gamma irradiation.
FIGS. 4 & 5 are graphs showing the protective effects of primary lyophilizing and secondary lyophilizing on the sensitivity of a monoclonal immunoglobulin.
FIGS. 6-11 are graphs showing the protective effect of certain stabilizers on the activity of lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin.
FIG. 12 is a graph showing the protective effect of stabilizers on the activity of lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin when the sample was irradiated at a high dose rate (30 kGy/hr).
FIG. 13 is a graph showing the effect of a stabilizer on IgM activity after irradiation with gamma radiation.
FIGS. 14 and 15 are graphs showing the effect of stabilizers on immobilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin after irradiation with gamma radiation.
FIGS. 16A, 16B, 17A, and 17B are graphs showing the effect of ascorbate at varying concentrations on immobilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin after irradiation with gamma radiation.
FIGS. 18A-18H are graphs showing the effect of stabilizers on lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin supplemented with human serum albumin or sucrose, after irradiation with gamma radiation.
FIGS. 19A-19F are graphs showing the effect of stabilizers on lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin supplemented with bovine serum albumin, after irradiation with gamma radiation.
FIGS. 20A and 20B are graphs showing the effect of various doses of gamma radiation on anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin, with and without ascorbate.
FIGS. 21A and 21B are graphs showing the effect of low pH (4.5) on the stabilizing effect of L-ascorbic acid on monoclonal immunoglobulin irradiated to 45 kGy with gamma radiation.
FIG. 22 is a graph showing the level of viral inactivation by irradiation with gamma radiation of an anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin contaminated with porcine parvovirus (PPV).
FIGS. 23A and 23B are graphs showing the effect of the presence or absence of sodium ascorbate on the level of activity retention achieved when irradiating monoclonal immunoglobulins in both liquid and lyophilized forms with e-beam radiation.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein are intended to have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the relevant art. All patents and publications mentioned herein are expressly incorporated by reference.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, the term “immunoglobulin” is used synonymously with the term “antibody”, and encompasses all classes of immunoglobulins including, without limitation, IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD and IgE and all subclasses of immunoglobulins such as the IgG subclasses IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 found in or produced by cells or animals including humans. The term “immunoglobulin” encompasses both membrane immunoglobulins and secreted immunoglobulins. Membrane immunoglobulins are transmembrane proteins of B cells, and act as the B cells' antigen receptor. Secreted immunoglobulins are structurally identical to their membrane counterparts except that they lack the trans-membrane region of amino acids at the C-terminus of membrane immunoglobulins. Secreted immunoglobulins are present in extracellular fluids and secretions.
The term “immunoglobulin” also encompasses fragments of immunoglobulins including, without limitation, fragments F(ab′)2, Fab′, Fab, Fc, Facb, pFc′, and Fd, as well as immunoglobulin derivatives and metabolites as are known in the art. Metabolites of immunoglobulin are products resulting from the metabolism of immunoglobulins by a living organism. A wide variety of derivatives of immunoglobulins as are known in the art may be prepared by known methods, which typically involve breaking peptide or disulfide bonds in the immunoglobulin. Immunoglobulins may also be derivatized to include modified or synthetic or unnatural amino acids. Derivatives of immunoglobulins also include immunoglobulins conjugated to a moiety such as a toxin (e.g. diphtheria toxin, ricin), a labelling molecule (e.g. fluorescin, Texas Red), a radioactive atom or molecule (e.g. 125I) for therapeutic or diagnostic use, an enzyme (e.g. avidin, horseradish peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase), et cetera. Immunoglobulins may include post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, glyocsylation, myristilation, prenylation, ADP-ribosylation, methylation, acetylation, hydroxylation, carboxylation, and oxidation-reduction, or may be cationized or anionized to alter the overall charge of the immunoglobulin.
The term “monoclonal immunoglobulins” refers to homogeneous immunoglobulins produced by a single clone, and are to be contrasted with polyclonal immunoglobulins. Monoclonal immunoglobulins are usually made from hybridomas, which are prepared by fusing immunized mouse or rat spleen cells with a non-secretor myeloma using polyethylene glycol (PEG). The fusion mixture is plated out in HAT medium, containing hypoxanthine, aminopterin and thymidine. Aminopterin blocks a metabolic pathway which can be bypassed if hypoxanthine and thymidine are present. The myeloma cells lack this bypass and consequently die in the HAT medium. Spleen cells die naturally in culture after one or two weeks, but fused cells survive because they have the immortality of the myeloma and the metabolic bypass of the spleen cells. Some of the fused cells secrete antibody, and the supernatants are tested in a specific assay. Wells which produce the desired antibody are then cloned. Monoclonal immunoglobulins may also be produced by various techniques familiar to one skilled in the art of genetic engineering that cause the inducible or constitutive expression of a single set of endogenous genes that code for a single immunoglobulin, or that involve the addition of such a set or portion of a set, of genes into a cell or organism in such a manner as to result in either the inducible or constitutive expression of the resulting single set of genes that code for a single immunoglobulin.
Monoclonal immunoglobulins may be produced using the above-described techniques in combination with in vitro cell culture, in vivo cell culture (for example as an ascites culture) or by the techniques of transgenesis. Transgenesis involves the insertion of one or more genes into a recipient organism. The recipient organism then produces the protein product of these genes, either constitutively or following induction, and either incorporates them or secretes the into a tissue (including eggs) or fluid (including blood, sweat, milk or urine). The resulting tissue or fluid is then harvested and the desired monoclonal immunoglobulin is purified from it.
As used herein, the term “preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins” encompasses, without limitation: (1) compositions consisting solely of monoclonal immunoglobulins (such as monoclonal immunoglobulins of a single specificity or combinations of monoclonal immunoglobulins of different specificities and/or different classes) and which may contain impurities (including the naturally-occuring components of a tissue or fluid into which the monoclonal antibody was produced by transgenic means); (2) compositions comprising monoclonal immunoglobulins, pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, carriers, adjuvants, liposomes and other therapeutic agents, et cetera, as are known in the art; (3) partially-purified in-process intermediate preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins; and (4) articles containing monoclonal immunoglobulins or having monoclonal immunoglobulins immobilized upon them or otherwise disposed thereon. Preferred “preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins” are discussed below.
In therapeutic applications, monoclonal immunoglobulins are typically combined with buffer or salt solutions as are known in the art. The monoclonal immunoglobulin may also be combined with another therapeutic agent. For instance, anti-platelet monoclonal immunoglobulins which prevent platelets from aggregating are being evaluated for long-term therapy for the prevention of formation of thrombi. In this application, the anti-platelet monoclonal immunoglobulin is administered together with aspirin. The monoclonal immunoglobulin and the other therapeutic agent may be co-packaged for administration by, for example, intravenous injection. This may take the form of simple inclusion into a single external package, or they may be provided in a single container. An example of a more advanced form of packaging would be the use of monoclonal immunoglobulins in liposome preparations. Typically, the immunoglobulin is embedded in at least the outer layer of the liposome where it can act as a targeting agent by binding to structures on or in the desired cells or tissues. The drug, which is contained within the liposome, is then released at this specific site, providing a more concentrated drug therapy with a larger therapeutic index than achievable by ordinary systemic therapy.
For therapeutic use, the monoclonal immunoglobulins are typically provided in liquid, frozen, or freeze-dried (lyophilized) form packaged under nitrogen or vacuum. The monoclonal immunoglobulins are usually then reconstituted with sterile water (if required, or thawed as needed) and administered by an appropriate route, such as an intramuscular injection or intravenous injection either directly or following placement in an IV bag. In accordance with the invention, the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins may be irradiated at any stage, including but not limited to as a raw material, a purified or partially-purified in-process intermediate, in bulk or in individual or multi-dose packaging, before or after packaging, after dilution for administration, or in the IV bag or other delivery vehicle itself. The irradiation may be carried out at any convenient temperature that does not have a deleterious effect upon the preparation, and which may be above or below the freezing or eutectic point of the preparation. Various preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins are available for therapeutic use, as set forth in Table 1.
Therapeutic Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Products
B Cell non-
Source for above Table: A practical guide to ELISA, D. M. Kemeny, Pergamon Press
*FD - Freeze-Dried (Lyophylized), L - Liquid, I - Immobilized on a surface, C - Capsule (Oral Dosing) containing dried material
Preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins also find application as research tools and a vast number are used for diagnostic purposes, particularly in blood work. Typical research tools and diagnostic tests involving monoclonal immunoglobulins include enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), radioimmunoassays (RIA), magnetic-bead-based assays and separation kits, and fluorescent activated cell analysis and/or sorting, among others. It is desirable to sterilize such diagnostic tools, both to preserve them, as well as for safety, as they are handled by lab technicians. Preparations of monoclonal immunoglobulins used for diagnostic purposes often comprise a solid support, such as a dipstick or plastic plate, having the monoclonal immunoglobulins immobilized on or in it by covalent chemistry, drying, or other known means. In accordance with the invention, an entire commercial package or kit, containing the solid support with monoclonal immunoglobulins affixed thereto, instructions, containers of reagents (for instance a reference sample for generating a standard curve), et cetera, may be sterilized in accordance with the invention. Table 2 sets forth a number of commercial diagnostic monoclonal immunoglobulin products.
Diagnostic Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Products
HSV Type 1
J & J
Sources for above Table: A practical guide to ELISA, D. M. Kemeny, Pergamon Press
*FD - Freeze-Dried (Lyophylized), L - Liquid, I - Immobilized on a surface, C - Capsule (Oral Dosing) containing dried material
As used herein, the term “sterilize” is intended to mean a reduction in the level of at least one active biological contaminant found in the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins being treated according to the present invention.
As used herein, the term “biological contaminant” is intended to mean a contaminant that, upon direct or indirect contact with a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins, may have a deleterious effect on a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins or upon a recipient thereof. Such biological contaminants include the various viruses, bacteria and parasites known to those of skill in the art to generally be found in or infect preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Examples of biological contaminants include, but are not limited to, the following: viruses, such as human immuno-deficiency viruses and other retroviruses, herpes viruses, parvoviruses, filoviruses, circoviruses, paramyxoviruses, cytomegaloviruses, hepatitis viruses (including hepatitis B and hepatitis C), pox viruses, toga viruses, Epstein-Barr virus and parvoviruses; bacteria, such as Escherichia, Bacillus, Campylobacter, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus; parasites, such as Trypanosoma and malarial parasites, including Plasmodium species; yeasts; molds; mycoplasmas; and prions. As used herein, the term “active biological contaminant” is intended to mean a biological contaminant that is capable of causing the deleterious effect.
As used herein, the term “a biologically compatible solution” is intended to mean a solution to which monoclonal immunoglobulins may be exposed, such as by being suspended or dissolved therein, and remain viable, i.e., retain their essential biological and physiological characteristics.
As used herein, the term “a biologically compatible buffered solution” is intended to mean a biologically compatible solution having a pH and osmotic properties (e.g., tonicity, osmolality and/or oncotic pressure) suitable for maintaining the integrity of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Suitable biologically compatible buffered solutions typically have a pH between 4 and 8.5 and are isotonic or only moderately hypotonic or hypertonic. Biologically compatible buffered solutions are known and readily available to those of skill in the art.
As used herein, the term “stabilizer” is intended to mean a compound or material that reduces any damage to the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins being irradiated to a level that is insufficient to preclude the safe and effective use of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Illustrative examples of stabilizers include, but are not limited to, the following: antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid and tocopherol; and free radical scavengers, such as ethanol. Preferred examples of stabilizers include, but are not limited to, the following: fatty acids, including 6,8-dimercapto-octanoic acid (lipoic acid) and its derivatives and analogues (alpha, beta, dihydro, bisno and tetranor lipoic acid), thioctic acid, 6,8-dimercapto-octanoic acid, dihydrolopoate (DL-6,8-dithioloctanoic acid methyl ester), lipoamide, bisonor methyl ester and tatranor-dihydrolipoic acid, furan fatty acids, oleic and linoleic and palmitic acids and their salts and derivatives; flavonoids, phenylpropaniods, and flavenols, such as quercetin, rutin and its derivatives, apigenin, aminoflavone, catechin, hesperidin and, naringin; carotenes, including beta-carotene; Co-Q10; xanthophylls; polyhydric alcohols, such as glycerol, mannitol; sugars, such as xylose, glucose, ribose, mannose, fructose and trehalose; amino acids, such as histidine, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), glutamic acid, tryptophan, sodium carpryl N-acetyl tryptophan and methionine; azides, such as sodium azide; enzymes, such as Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and Catalase; uric acid and its derivatives, such as 1,3-dimethyluric acid and dimethylthiourea; allopurinol; thiols, such as glutathione and reduced glutathione and cysteine; trace elements, such as selenium; vitamins, such as vitamin A, vitamin C (including its derivatives and salts such as sodium ascorbate and palmitoyl ascorbic acid) and vitamin E (and its derivatives and salts such as tocopherol acetate and alpha-tocotrienol); chromanol-alpha-C6; 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroma-2 carboxylic acid (Trolox) and derivatives; extraneous proteins, such as gelatin and albumin; tris-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one (MCI-186); citiolone; puercetin; chrysin; dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); piperazine diethanesulfonic acid (PIPES); imidazole; methoxypsoralen (MOPS); 1,2-dithiane-4,5-diol; reducing substances, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT); cholesterol; probucol; indole derivatives; thimerosal; lazaroid and tirilazad mesylate; proanthenols; proanthocyanidins; ammonium sulfate; Pegorgotein (PEG-SOD); N-tert-butyl-alpha-phenylnitrone (PBN); 4-nydroxy-2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl (Tempol); mixtures of ascorbate, urate and Trolox C (Asc/urate/Trolox C); proteins, peptides and dipeptides; the Glycine homodipeptide glycine-glycine (Gly-Gly); reduced glutathione; diosmin; pupurogalin; gallic acid and its derivatives including but not limited to propyl gallat;, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and silymarin.
As used herein, the term “residual solvent content” is intended to mean the amount or proportion of freely-available liquid in the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Freely-available liquid means that liquid, such as water or an organic solvent (e.g. ethanol, isopropanol, polyethylene glycol, etc.), present in the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that is not bound to or complexed with one or more of the non-liquid components of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Freely-available liquid includes intracellular water. The residual solvent contents related as water referenced herein refer to levels determined by the FDA approved, modified Karl Fischer method (Meyer and Boyd, Analytical Chem., 31, 215-219, 1959; May, et al., J. Biol. Standardization, 10, 249-259, 1982; Centers for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA, Docket No. 89D-0140, 83-93; 1990). Quantitation of the residual levels of other solvents may be determined by means well known in the art, depending upon which solvent is employed. The proportion of residual solvent to solute may also be considered to be a reflection of the concentration of the solute within the solvent. When so expressed, the greater the concentration of the solute, the lower the amount of residual solvent.
As used herein, the term “sensitizer” is intended to mean a substance that selectively targets viral, bacterial, prion and/or parasitic contaminants, rendering them more sensitive to inactivation by radiation, therefore permitting the use of a lower rate or dose of radiation and/or a shorter time of irradiation than in the absence of the sensitizer. Illustrative examples of suitable sensitizers include, but are not limited to, the following: psoralen and its derivatives and analogs (including 3-carboethoxy psoralens); angelicins, khellins and coumarins which contain a halogen substituent and a water solubilization moiety, such as quaternary ammonium ion or phosphonium ion; nucleic acid binding compounds; brominated hematoporphyrin; phthalocyanines; purpurins; porphorins; halogenated or metal atom-substituted derivatives of dihematoporphyrin esters, hematoporphyrin derivatives, benzoporphyrin derivatives, hydrodibenzoporphyrin dimaleimade, hydrodibenzoporphyrin, dicyano disulfone, tetracarbethoxy hydrodibenzoporphyrin, and tetracarbethoxy hydrodibenzoporphyrin dipropionamide; doxorubicin and daunomycin, which may be modified with halogens or metal atoms; netropsin; BD peptide, S2 peptide; S-303 (ALE compound); dyes, such as hypericin, methylene blue, eosin, fluoresceins (and their derivatives), flavins, merocyanine 540; photoactive compounds, such as bergapten; and SE peptide.
As used herein, the term “radiation” is intended to mean radiation of sufficient energy to sterilize at least some component of the irradiated monoclonal immunoglobulins. Types of radiation include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) corpuscular (streams of subatomic particles such as neutrons, electrons, and/or protons); and (ii) electromagnetic (originating in a varying electromagnetic field, such as radio waves, visible (both mono and polychromatic) and invisible light, ultraviolet radiation, x-radiation, and gamma rays and mixtures thereof). Such radiation is often described as either ionizing (capable of producing ions in irradiated materials) radiation such as gamma rays and non-ionizing radiation such as visible light. The sources of such radiation may vary, however in general the specific source is of little material difference as long as sufficient radiation is given in an appropriate time and at an appropriate rate to effect sterilization. In practice, gamma radiation is usually produced by isotopes of Cobalt or Cesium, while X-rays are produced by machines that emit X-radiation, and electrons are often used to sterilize materials in a method known as “e-beam” irradiation that involves their production via a machine.
B. Particularly Preferred Embodiments
A first preferred embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for sterilizing a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that is sensitive to radiation comprising: (i) reducing the residual solvent content of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins to a level effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; and (ii) irradiating the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins with radiation at an effective rate for a time effective to sterilize the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins.
A second embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for sterilizing a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that is sensitive to radiation comprising: (i) adding to a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins at least one stabilizer in an amount effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; and (ii) irradiating the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins with radiation at an effective rate for a time effective to sterilize the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins.
A third embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for sterilizing a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins that is sensitive to radiation comprising: (i) reducing the residual solvent content of a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins to a level effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; (ii) adding to the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins at least one stabilizer in an amount effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from radiation; and (iii) irradiating the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins with radiation at an effective rate for a time effective to sterilize the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. The order of steps (i) and (ii) may, of course, be reversed as desired.
According to the methods of the present invention, the residual solvent content of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins may be reduced prior to irradiation of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins with radiation. The residual solvent content is reduced to a level that is effective to protect the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins from the radiation. Suitable levels of residual solvent content may vary depending upon the nature and characteristics of the particular preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins being irradiated and can be determined empirically by one skilled in the art. Preferably, when the solvent is water, the residual solvent content is less than about 10%, more preferably less than about 2.0%, more preferably less than about 1.0%, even more preferably less than about 0.5% and most preferably less than about 0.2%.
According to the methods of the present invention, the monoclonal antibody to be sterilized may be immobilized upon a solid surface by a means familiar to one skilled in the art.
According to the methods of the present invention, the rate of irradiation may be optimized to produce the most advantageous combination of product recovery and time required to complete the operation. Both low (≦3 kGy/hour) and high (>3 kGy/hour) rates may be achieved by the appropriate application of the methods described herein.
While not wishing to be bound by any theory of operability, it is believed that the reduction in residual solvent content reduces the degrees of freedom of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins and thereby protects it from the effects of the radiation. Similar results might therefore be achieved by lowering the temperature of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins below its eutectic point or below its freezing point, or by vitrification to likewise reduce the degrees of freedom of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. These results may permit the use of a higher rate of irradation than might otherwise be acceptable. Thus the inventions described herein may be carried out at any temperature that does not result in damage to the monoclonal immunoglobulin.
The residual solvent content of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins may be reduced by any of the methods and techniques known to those skilled in the art for reducing solvent from a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Such methods may include, but are not limited to, evaporation, concentration, centrifugal concentration, vitrification and spray-drying. A particularly preferred method for reducing the residual solvent content of a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins is lyophilization. According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, a preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins which has been lyophilized is stored under vacuum or an inert atmosphere (preferably a noble gas, such as helium or argon, more preferably a higher molecular weight noble gas, and most preferably argon) prior to irradation.
The radiation employed in the present invention may be any radiation effective for the inactivation of one or more biological contaminants of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins being treated. The radiation may be corpuscular, including e-beam radiation. Preferably the radiation is electromagnetic radiation, including visible light, UV light and mixtures of various wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation and a particularly preferred form of radiation is gamma radiation.
According to the methods of the present invention, the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins is irradiated with the radiation at a rate effective for the inactivation of one or more biological contaminants of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Suitable rates of irradiation may vary depending upon the particular form of radiation and the nature and characteristics of the particular preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins being irradiated and the particular biological contaminants being inactivated. Suitable rates of irradiation can be determined empirically by one skilled in the art. Preferably, the rate of irradiation is constant for the duration of the sterilization procedure. When this is impractical, a variable or discontinuous irradiation may be utilized.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rate of irradiation is not more than about 3.0 kGy/hour, more preferably between about 0.1 kGy/hr. and 3.0 kGy/hr, even more preferably between about 0.25 kGy/hr and 2.0 kGy/hour, still even more preferably between about 0.5 kGy/hr and 1.5 kGy/hr and most preferably between about 0.5 kGy/hr and 1.0 kGy/hr.
According to another particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rate of irradiation is at least about 3.0 kGy/hr., more preferably at least about 6 kGy/hr., even more preferably at least about 16 kGy/hr., and even more preferably at least about 30 kGy/hr and most preferably at least about 45 kGy/hr or greater.
The preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins is irradiated with the radiation for a time effective for the inactivation of one or more biological contaminants of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Combined with irradiation rate, the appropriate irradiation time results in the appropriate dose of irradiation being applied to the monoclonal immunoglobilin. Suitable ionization times may vary depending upon the particular form and rate of radiation and the nature and characteristics of the particular preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins being irradiated and the particular biological contaminants being inactivated. Suitable irradiation times can be determined empirically by one skilled in the art.
Optionally, an effective amount of at least one sensitizing compound may be added to the monoclonal immunoglobulin prior to irradiation to enhance the anti-microbial effect of the irradiation, while employing the methods described herein to minimize the deleterious effects of irradiation upon the monoclonal immunoglobulin. Suitable sensitizers are known to those skilled in the art.
According to methods of the present invention, the irradiation of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins may occur at any temperature which is not deleterious to the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins being treated. According to a preferred embodiment, the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins is irradiated at ambient temperature. According to an alternate preferred embodiment, the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins is irradiated at reduced temperature, preferably at or below the freezing or eutectic point of the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins.
In order to avoid aggregation of the monoclonal immunoglobulins, the preparation of monoclonal immunoglobulins may have a pH of less than 7, preferably less than 6, more preferably less than 5, even more preferably less than 4, and most preferably less than 3.
It will be appreciated that combination of the several methods described herein may be employed to further minimize undesirable effects upon the monoclonal immunoglobulin caused by irradiation, while maintaining adequate effectiveness of the anti-microbial properties of the irradiation process.
The following examples are illustrative, but not limiting, of the present invention. Other suitable modifications and adaptations are of the variety normally encountered by those skilled in the art and are fully within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Unless otherwise noted, all irradiation was accomplished using a 60Co source.
In this experiment the protective effects of certain stabilizers were evaluated using lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin exposed to 45 kGy of low dose gamma irradiation. The stabilizers tested were: sodium ascorbate, methionine, and lipoic acid.
In 2 ml glass vials, a 0.5 ml total volume was lyophilized containing 50 μg anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin, 5 mg bovine serum albumin (1%) and either no stabilizer or 50 mM of the stabilizer of interest. The samples were stoppered under vacuum. Samples were irradiated with gamma radiation (45 kGy total dose, dose rate 1.83 kGy/hr, temperature 4° C.) and then reconstituted with water.
Immunoglobulin binding activity of independent duplicate samples was determined by a standard ELISA protocol: 96-well microtitre plates were coated overnight with 2.5 μg/ml insulin antigen. Three-fold serial dilutions of anti-insulin monoclonal antibody samples starting at 5 μg/ml were used. Goat anti-mouse Ig conjungated to phosphatase used at 50 ng/ml. Sigma 104 alkaline phosphatase substrate was used at 1 mg/ml in DEA buffer. Binding activity was determined by absorbance at 405-620 nm.
Relative protection was determined by estimating the shift in the titration curve (i.e. concentration of immunoglobulin needed to observe the same amount of binding) of the irradiated sample compared to an unirradiated sample at approximately 50% of the maximum absorbance signal for the unirradiated sample.
Lyophilized samples containing no stabilizer retained 50% of immunoglobulin avidity following irradiation with 45 kGy gamma irradiation. This is in contrast to previous results in which 45 kGy of gamma radiation destroyed essentially all the activity of immunoglubulin when it was irradiated in solution. Thus, it is apparent that the reduction in residual water content by lyophilizing afforded significant protection on its own to the monoclonal immunoglobulin.
The addition of sodium ascorbate provided full recovery of activity after irradiation of the sample. Both methionine and lipoic acid provided significant recovery of activity (76-83%) of activity after irradiation as compared to the unirradiated sample. The results are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. Similar results (65% recovery of activity) were also seen for pupurogalin (data not shown).
In this experiment, the protective effects of certain stabilizers were evaluated using lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin exposed to 45 kGy of low dose gamma irradiation. The stabilizers tested were: sodium ascorbate, N-acetyl cysteine, glutathione and mixtures of urate/trolox and ascorbate/urate/trolox.
In 3 ml glass vials, a 1.0 ml total volume was lyophilized containing 100 μg anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin, 10 mg bovine serum albumin (1%) and either no stabilizer or the stabilizer of interest. The samples were stoppered under vacuum. Samples were irradiated with gamma radiation (45 kGy total dose, dose rate 1.83 kGy/hr, temperature 4° C.) and then reconstituted with 1.0 ml water.
Immunoglobulin binding activity of independent duplicate samples was determined by a standard ELISA protocol: Maxisorb plates were coated overnight with 2.5 μg/ml insulin antigen. Three-fold serial dilutions of anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin samples starting at 5 μg/ml were used. Goat anti-mouse Ig conjugated to phosphatase was used at 50 ng/ml. Binding activity was determined by absorbance at 405-620 nm.
Relative protection was determined using a parallel line analysis software package (PLA 1.2 from Stegmann Systemberatung).
Lyophilized samples containing no stabilizer retained 70% of immunoglobulin avidity following irradiation with 45 kGy gamma irradiation. This is in contrast to previous results in which 45 kGy of gamma radiation destroyed essentially all the activity of immunoglubulin when it was irrradiated in solution. Thus, it is apparent that the reduction in residual water content by lyophilizing afforded significant protection on its own protein.
The presence of sodium ascorbate increased recovery by 20%, i.e. such that there is 90% avidity recovered after irradiation. The remaining stabilizers resulted in recovery of 77-84% of avidity. The results are shown in FIGS. 3A-3C.
In this experiment, the protective effects of primary lyophilizing (which leaves a relatively “high moisture” content in the product) and the combination of both primary and secondary lyophilizing (which results in a product with relatively “low moisture”) on the radiation sensitivity of a monoclonal immunoglobulin were determined.
In 3 ml glass vials, 1.0 ml total volume was lyophilized (using either only primary or a combination of both primary and secondary drying) containing 100 μg anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin, 10 mg bovine serum albumin (1%) and either no stabilizer or 100 mM of sodium ascorbate. The samples were stoppered under vacuum. Samples were irradiated with gamma radiation (45 kGy total dose, dose rate between 2.03 and 2.13 kGy/hr, temperature 4° C.) and then reconstituted with 1.0 ml water.
Immunoglobulin binding activity of independent duplicate samples was determined by a standard ELISA protocol: Maxisorb plates were coated overnight with 2.5 μg/ml insulin antigen. Three-fold serial dilutions of anti-insulin mAb samples starting at 5 μg/ml were used. Goat anti-mouse Ig conjugated to phosphatase was used at 50 ng/ml. Binding activity was determined by absorbance at 405-620 nm.
In the absence of a stabilizer, there was better recovery of the anti-insulin immunoglobulin after irradiation from the samples that had undergone the secondary “low moisture” drying cycle, i.e. a lower total moisture content in the absence of a stabilizer improved recovery.
In the presence of the stabilizer, however, there was very good recovery of antibody activity after 45 kGy irradiation, irrespective of whether the sample had undergone only the primary “high moisture” drying cycle or had also undergone the secondary “low moisture” drying cycle.
The results of this experiment are shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.
In this experiment, the protective effect of certain stabilizers on the activity of lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin was determined. The stabilizers tested were; sodium ascorbate; trolox/urate/ascorbate mixtures; and N-acetyl cysteine.
Anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin supplemented with 1% of human serum albumin (and, optionally, 5% sucrose) was lyophilized, stoppered under vacuum, and irradiated (total dose 45 kGy; dose rate between 1.83 and 1.88 kGy/hr). Immunoglobulin binding activity was determined using the standard ELISA protocol described above.
Irradiation of lyophilized anti-insulin immunoglobulin supplemented with 1% HSA to a dose of 45 kGy resulted in an average loss of avidity of about 33%. The addition of the following stabilizers significantly improved recovery: 20 mM sodium ascorbate (100% recovery); 200 μM trolox/1.5 mM urate/20 mM ascorbate (87%) recovery); 20 mM N-acetyl cysteine (82% recovery The addition of 5% sucrose to the lyophilized immunoglobulin containing 1% HSA resulted in an average loss of avidity of about 30% when irradiated to a dose of 45 kGy. The addition of the following stabilizers significantly improved recovery: 20 mM sodium ascorbate (88% recovery); 200 μM trolox/1.5 mM urate/20 mM ascorbate (84%) recovery); 20 mM N-acetyl cysteine (72% recovery).
The results of these experiments are shown in FIGS. 6-11.
In this experiment, the protective effect of stabilizers (ascorbate) on the activity of lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin was determined when the sample was irradiated at a high dose rate (30 kGy/hr).
Anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin was lyophilized and irradiated at a rate of 30 kGy/hr (total dose 45 kGy). Immunoglobulin binding activity was determined using the standard ELISA protocol described above.
Irradiation of lyophilized anti-insulin immunoglobulin to a dose of 45 kGy resulted in an average loss of activity of about 32%. The addition of 20 mM sodium ascorbate provided 85% recovery of avidity compared to an unirradiated sample. The results are shown in FIG. 12.
In this experiment, an IgM monoclonal immunoglobulin specific for murine IgG3 was irradiated at a low dose rate in the presence or absence of a stabilizer.
Liquid rat anti-murine IgG3 monoclonal IgM (in a PBS buffer with 10 mM sodium azide; concentration of antibody was 666 ng/μl) was irradiated at a rate of 1.8 kGy/hr to a total dose of either 10 kGy or 45 kGy. Samples either contained no stabilizer or a stabilizer mixture containing 20 mM citrate, 300 μM urate and 200 mM ascorbate.
Immunoglobulin activity was analyzed by standard ELISA protocol using murine IgG3 as the coating antigen and a phosphatase-conjugated anti-rat IgM detection antibody.
Liquid samples containing no stabilizer lost all functional immunoglobulin activity following irradiation with either 10 kGy or 45 kGy gamma irradiation. The presence of a stabilizer mixture, however, provided full recovery of activity following irradiation with 10 kGy gamma radiation and 88% recovery of activity following irradiation with 45 kGy gamma radiation. The results of this experiment are shown graphically in FIG. 13.
In this experiment, the protective effects of certain stabilizers were evaluated using immobilized anti-human insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin exposed to 45 kGy of low dose-rate gamma irradiation. The stabilizers tested were: sodium ascorbate, reduced glutathione, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, and polypropylene glycol.
Two plates were coated with 100 μl/well of freshly prepared 2 μg/ml anti-insulin immunoglobulin in coating buffer overnight at 4° C. The plates were washed briefly three times with PBS. A two-fold dilution series of each stabilizer in PBS was prepared. 100 μl of a selected stabilizer solution was added to each well. The plates were covered tightly with a cap mat. One plate was irradiated at 1.92 kGy/hr for a total of 45 kGy at 4° C. The control plate received 0 kGy and was stored at 4° C.
Immunoglobulin binding activity was determined by a standard ELISA protocol. The plate wells were emptied and were washed four times with a full volume of PBS. A full volume of blocking buffer (approximately 380 μl) was added to all wells and incubated for two hours at 37° C. All wells were washed four times with TBST (TBS pH 7.4 with 0.05% TWEEN 20). One hundred μl of 50 ng/ml biotin-labelled insulin in binding buffer was added to each well. The plates were covered with a plate sealer and incubated at 37° C. while shaking (LabLine titer plate shaker set at 3) for 1.5 hours. The plates were then washed four times with TBST. One hundred μl of 0.5 μg/ml phosphatase-labelled Streptavidin (stock diluted 1:1000 in binding buffer) was added to each well. The plates were covered with a plate sealer and incubated at 37° C. for one hour with shaking. The plates were then washed four times with TBST. One hundred μl of 1 mg/ml Sigma 104 phosphatase substrate in DEA buffer was added to each well. The plates were then incubated at 37° C. with shaking. Absorbance was determined at 405 nm-628 nm at 5 minute intervals.
As shown in FIGS. 14 and 15, sodium ascorbate exhibited a dose-dependent protective effect. Samples containing between 31-250 mM of sodium ascorbate exhibited 73-81% greater retained activity.
Samples containing glutathione exhibited approximately 25% greater retention of monoclonal immunoglobulin activity, that was dose dependent up to a glutathione concentration of about 31 mM.
Samples treated with sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate exhibited approximately 50% greater retained activity than control samples at a stabilizer concentration of 31 mM.
All three forms of polypropylene glycol (i.e. polypropylene P400 (Fluka 81350); polypropylene P1200 (Fluka 81370); and polypropylene P2000 (Fluka 81380)) exhibited a protective effect. Samples treated with polypropylene glycol exhibited approximately 50-60% increased retention of activity relative to control samples.
In this experiment, the optimal concentration of sodium ascorbate to protect immobilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulins from 45 kGy of gamma irradiation was determined. It was also determined whether the presence of 1.5 mM uric acid has any effect on the stabilizing nature of ascorbate of immobilized monoclonal immunoglobulin exposed to 45 kGy gamma irradiation.
Two plates were coated overnight at 4° C. with 100 μl of 2.5 μg/ml anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin in coating buffer. The coating solution was discarded and the wells washed two times with PBS. Twenty-five μl of 4×ascorbate solution was added to appropriate wells. Seventy-five μl of water was added to the urate-free wells (rows a-d). Twenty five μl of water was added to the urate containing wells (rows e-h). Fifteen μl of 3 mM urate was added to the urate containing wells (rows e-h). The plates were covered with a 96-well cap mat. One plate was irradiated with gamma radiation at 1.9 kGy/hr for a total of 45 kGy at 4° C. The other plate was stored at 4° C. as a travel control.
Immunoglobulin binding activity was determined by a standard ELISA protocol as follows. The well contents were removed, and the wells washed twice with a full volume of PBS. Non-specific binding sites were blocked by adding a full volume of blocking buffer (approximately 380 μl) to all wells and incubated for two hours at 37° C. All wells were washed three times with TBST. One hundred μl of 10 ng/ml insulin-biotin in binding buffer was added to each well (stock diluted 1:100,000 in binding buffer). The plates were covered with a plate sealer and incubated at 37° C. with shaking (LabLine titer plate shaker set at three) for one hour. The plates were washed with TBST for four sets of two washes each set, usually leaving five minutes between each set. One hundred μl of 25 ng/ml phosphatase-labelled Streptavidin (stock diluted 1:20,000 in binding buffer) was added to each well. Plates were covered with a plate sealer and incubated at 37° C. for one hour with shaking. Each plate was washed with TBST for four sets of two washes each set, usually leaving approximately five minutes between each set. One hundred μl of 1 ng/ml Sigma 104 phosphatase substrate in DEA buffer was added to each well. The plates were incubated at ambient temperature with nutation. Absorbance was determined at 405 nM-620 nM.
It was determined that the optimal concentration of sodium ascorbate necessary to provide maximal protection of immobilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulins in an aqueous environment (in the absence of uric acid) is approximately 150 mM. Approximately 50% recovery of the anti-insulin binding activity was achieved at a concentration of approximately 150 mM ascorbate. The addition of 1.5 mM uric acid resulted in a slight left shift in the ascorbate dose curve (˜5 mM) and appeared to cause maximal recovery of activity to be achieved at a lower concentration of ascorbate (˜30 mM). FIG. 16A shows the complete data set, and FIG. 16B is an expansion of the critical region of the data used to determine these values.
In this experiment, the optimal concentration of sodium ascorbate to protect immobilized monoclonal immunoglobulin from 45 kGy gamma irradiation was determined. The experiment also determined whether the presence of 2.25 mm of uric acid effects the stabilizing effect of ascorbate.
Two plates were coated overnight at 4° C. with 100 μl of 2.5 μg/ml anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin in coating buffer. The coating solution was discarded and the wells washed twice with PBS. Twenty-five μl of 4×ascorbate solution was added to appropriate wells. Seventy-five μl of water was added to the urate-free wells (rows a-d). Seventy-five μl of 3 mM urate stock was added to the urate-containing wells (rows e-h) (f.c.=2.25 mM). The plates were covered with a 96-well cap mat. One plate was irradiated with gamma radiation at 1.9 kGy/hr for a total of 45 kGy at 4° C. The other plate was stored at 4° C. as a travel control.
Monoclonal immunoglobulin binding activity was determined as in Example 8.
As illustrated in FIGS. 17A and 17B, the optimal concentration of sodium ascorbate necessary to provide maximum protection of immobilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin in an aqueous environment (in the absence of uric acid) was determined to be approximately 70 mM. This contrasted with Example 8, which showed the optimal concentration of ascorbate to be approximately 150 mM. Approximately 100% recovery of anti-insulin binding activity was achieved in this example as opposed to approximately 50% recovery in Example 8. The addition of uric acid (2.25 mM) again resulted in a slight left shift of the ascorbate dose curve (˜5 mM) and appeared to cause maximum recovery of activity to be achieved at a lower concentration of ascorbate (˜25 mM). It was found that there is a biphasic nature to the irradiated samples without uric acid. Recovery improved significantly between 0-20 mM ascorbate, levelled off from 20-50 mM ascorbate, and then went up again until maximum recovery was observed at approximately 70 mM ascorbate.
In this experiment, the protective effect of various stabilizers on gamma irradiated freeze-dried anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin supplemented with 1% human serum albumin (HSA) and 5% sucrose was evaluated. The stabilizers tested were: ascorbate (20 mM); a mixture of trolox(200 mM), urate(1.5 uM), and ascorbate(20 mM); n-acetyl-l-cysteine(20 mM); reduced glutathione(20 mM); and the dipeptide, Gly-Gly(20mM).
Samples were freeze-dried for approximately 64 hours and stoppered under vacuum and sealed with an aluminum, crimped seal. Samples were irradiated at a dose rate of 1.83-1.88 kGy/hr to a total dose of 45.1-46.2 kGy at 4° C.
Monoclonal immunoglobulin activity was determined by a standard ELISA protocol. Maxisorp plates were coated with human recombinant insulin at 2.5 μg/ml overnight at 4° C. The plate was blocked with 200 μl of blocking buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, 2% BSA) for two hours at 37° C. and then washed six times with wash buffer (TBS, pH 7, 0.05% TWEEN 20). Samples were re-suspended in 500 μl of high purity water (100 ng/μl), diluted to 5 μg/ml in a 300 μl U-bottomed plate coated for either overnight or two hours with blocking buffer. Serial 3-fold dilutions were performed, with a final concentration of 0.0022 μg/ml. Plates were incubated for one hour at 37° C. with agitation and then washed six times with a wash buffer. Phosphatase-labelled goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) was diluted to 50 ng/ml in binding buffer and 100 μl was added to each well. The plate was incubated for one hour at 37° C. with agitation and washed six times with wash buffers. One hundred μl of Sigma-104 substrate (1 mg/ml in DEA buffer) was added to each well and reacted at room temperature. The plate was read on a Multiskan MCC/340 at 405 nM with the 620 nM absorbance subtracted.
As shown in FIGS. 18A-18H, freeze-dried anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin, supplemented with 1% HSA, gamma irradiated to 45 kGy resulted in an average loss in activity of 1.5 fold (average loss in avidity of 33%).
Samples irradiated to 45 kGy in the presence of stabilizers gave varying results:
20 mM ascorbate=˜100% recovery
200 uM trolox, 1.5 mM urate, 20 mM ascorbate=˜87% recovery
20 mM, n-acetyl-l-cysteine=˜82% recovery
20 mM reduced glutathione=˜76% recovery
20 mM Gly-Gly=˜100% recovery
Adding 5% sucrose to freeze-dried anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin containing 1% HSA resulted in an average recovery of 70% of the activity in the sample irradiated to 45 kGy (average loss in activity of approximately 1.5 fold or approximately 30% loss in avidity).
The samples that radiated to 45 kGy in the presence of the aforementioned stabilizers had reduced activities upon addition of 5% sucrose:
20 mM ascorbate=˜88% recovery
200 uM trolox, 1.5 mM urate, 20 mM ascorbate=˜84% recovery
20 mM n-acetyl-l-cysteine=˜72% recovery
20 mM reduced glutathione=˜69% recovery
20 mM gly-gly=˜79% recovery
Similar results have been obtained upon the addition of 20 mM ascorbate, 20 mM Gly-Gly or the addition of 20 mM of both ascorbate and Gly-Gly to another monoclonal IgG preparation of different specificity (anti-Ig Lambda Light Chain).
In this experiment, the protective effect of ascorbate(Asc, 20 mM), ascorbate(20 mM)/urate(1.5 mM)/trolox(200 uM) cocktail(AUT), n-acetyl-cysteine(neutral form: NAC-n, acidic form: NAC-a, both at 20 mM), Gly-Gly(20 mM), reduced glutathione(GSH, 20 mM), diosmin(39.3 uM) and silymarin(246 uM) on lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin was evaluated.
In 3 ml glass vials, 1.0 ml total volume containing 100 μg anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin, with 10 mg BSA (1%) and either no stabilizer or the stabilizer of interest was lyophilized. Samples were irradiated with gamma radiation (45 kGy total dose, dose rate 1.83 kGy/hr, temperature 4° C.) and then reconstituted with 1 ml of water. Karl Fischer moisture analysis was performed on the quadruplicate samples that did not contain immunoglobulin.
Immunoglobulin binding activity of independent duplicate samples was determined by a standard ELISA protocol: Maxisorp plates were coated overnight with 2.5 μg/ml insulin antigen. Three-fold serial dilutions of anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin samples starting at 5 μg/ml were used. Goat anti-mouse phosphatase conjugate was used at 50 mg/ml. Relative potency values of irradiated samples compared to their corresponding unirradiated sample were calculated using the parallel line analysis software package (PLA 1.2 from Stegmann Systemberatung). Mass spectroscopy analysis was performed by M-scan, Inc. of Westchester Pa.
As illustrated in FIGS. 19A-19F, irradiation of lyophilized anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin in the presence of 1% bovine serum albumin resulted in the loss of approximately 30% avidity (relative to unirradiated samples) of the immunoglobulin for its immobilized antigen. The addition of ascorbate alone improved the recovery by 20%, such that there was approximately 90% avidity recovered after irradiation. The addition of ascorbate/urate/trolox cocktail, the dipeptide Gly-Gly, neutral n-acetyl-cysteine, reduced glutathione, or silymarin resulted in recovery of 77-84% avidity.
Similar results have been obtained upon the addition of 200 mM ascorbate, 200 mM Gly-Gly or the addition of 200 mM of both ascorbate and Gly-Gly to two other monoclonal IgG preparations of different specificity (anti-Ig Lambda Light Chain and anti-IgG1).
In this experiment, the stability of anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin irradiated in the liquid form in the presence or absence of ascorbate was evaluated.
Anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin was diluted to 1 mg/ml and irradiated at 4° C. in the presence or absence of 200 mM ascorbate to a total dose of 0, 15, or 45 kGy of gamma radiation.
Immunoglobulin binding activity of independent duplicate samples was determined by a standard direct ELISA protocol generally as described in the previous example.
As shown in FIGS. 20A and 20B, the addition of 200 mM ascorbate resulted in recovery of 100% of immunoglobulin binding activity of samples irradiated with 15 kGy of radiation and recovery of 71.7% and 80.4% of the activity of samples radiated with 45 kGy of radiation compared to the in-house dilution control and the 0 kGy plus ascorbate control, respectively. As determined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, irradiation of the anti-insulin immunoglobulins and the absence of the stabilizer resulted in protein aggregation as evidenced by high molecular weight bands on polyacrylamide gels. Additionally, a significant loss of material was apparent. The addition of 200 mM ascorbate had a protective effect on the immunoglobulins irradiated at 15 kGy and 45 kGy, as demonstrated by the recovery of an intact IgG1 band and as well as heavy and light chain bands.
When duplicates of the 15 kGy plus 200 mM ascorbate samples were averaged, the antigen binding activity was not significantly different from that of the dilution control. In contrast, irradiating the samples containing ascorbate to 45 kGy resulted in an average 2- and 2.5-fold decrease in avidity when compared to the in-house dilution control and stock control, respectively. The SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that in the absence of ascorbate, irradiating the anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulins resulted in significant loss of material and a generation of high molecular weight aggregate. The addition of 200 mM ascorbate prevented aggregate formation and resulted in recovery of approximately 80% and approximately 50% of the immunoglobulins following irradiation to 15 kGy and 45 kGy, respectively.
This experiment was conducted to determine whether low pH (4.5) diminishes the stabilizing effect of L-ascorbic acid on monoclonal immunoglobulin irradiated to 45 kGy with gamma radiation.
An anti-human insulin monoclonal Ig (Anti-Human Insulin Monoclonal Immunoglobulin, Purified Clone #7F8; BioDesign International #E86102M, lot 7l25000) was irradiated as a liquid at a rate of 1.774 kGy/hr (60Co) in the presence and absence of 200 mM L-Ascorbic acid to a total dose of 45kGy, at pH 6.8 and 4.5. Following irradiation, the samples were assayed for their antigen-specific binding capability in an ELISA assay using insulin-coated plates as targets. Structural analysis of the Ig was done via standard SDS-PAGE electrophoresis under both reduced and non-reduced conditions.
As illustrated in FIGS. 21A and 21B, the ELISA functional assay results clearly show that recovery of the monoclonal immunoglobulin in the presence of ascorbate is not dependent on pH. The graphs for pH 6.8 and 4.5 are virtually superimposable. A slight loss of activity is seen at both pH values upon the addition of ascorbic acid and again following irradiation, however the magnitude of this reduction is small in comparison to the complete loss of activity seen when irradiation takes place in the absence of ascorbate.
SDS-PAGE electrophoresis gels showed a complete destruction of the immunoglobulin at 45 kGy in the absence of ascorbic acid at both pH 3.8 and pH 4.5. The addition of 200 mM ascorbic acid maintained the same apparent structure upon irradiation. A pH of 4.5 may have inhibited aggregation.
These results indicate that, in the presence of 200 mM ascorbic acid, monoclonal Ig can be irradiated to at least 45 kGy while retaining structure and activity at both pH 6.7 and 4.5.
In this experiment the level of viral inactivation and monoclonal immunoglobulin activity retention in anti-insulin monoclonal immunoglobulin infected with porcine parvovirus (PPV) irradiated with 60Co gamma radiation at an approximate rate of 1.8 kGy/hour at 4° C. was evaluated.
PPV was utilized as a model virus for Human Parvovirus B19, a non-enveloped virus that is considered the most difficult virus of concern in human-sourced biologics and a close analog of the other members of the Parvovirus family that are also considered the most difficult viruses of concern in animal-sourced biologics.
A high titre PPV stock was spiked into a preparation of a monoclonal immunoglobulin directed against insulin. A protectant, (sodium ascorbate) was added to some samples at a final concentration of 200 mM.
The samples to be irradiated were exposed to 60Co radiation at an approximate rate of 1.8 kGy/hour at 4° C.
After irradiation of some of the samples, aliquots of the spiked samples were taken and used to titre the amount of remaining infective virus particles. Briefly, the samples were assayed in a viral detection bioassay known as a Cytopathic Effect test (CPE). A cell line capable of being infected by the PPV virus and lysed by it (Porcine Kidney cells, also known as PK-13 cells) were added to 96-well assay plates to form a monolayer of approximately 70% confluence. Quadruplicate aliquots of the samples were added to the wells in a limiting-dilution series (5-fold dilutions). The plates were then incubated for 7-8 days and then examined to determine if viable cells remained in the wells. The resulting data was analysed using a Limiting-Dilution method as described by Karber to determine the viral titer which is shown in the accompanying Figure as Log10TCID50 Titer per 0.1 ml.
As shown in Table 4 below and in FIG. 22, the application of gamma radiation effectively inactivated the virus in a dose-dependent manner. The addition of 200 mM sodium ascorbate to the monoclonal immunoglobulin resulted in a significant reduction in the viral inactivation at lower doses, but at higher doses this effect was much smaller. The application of 45 kGy of gamma radiation to samples containing ascorbate resulted in greater than 4 logs of viral inactivation.
of Viral Titre
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the level of activity retention achieved when irradiating monoclonal immunoglobulins in both liquid and lyophilized forms with e-beam radiation in the presence or absence of sodium ascorbate.
Anti-Insulin IgG1 was tested in liquid and after having been lyophilized. Samples were prepared both with and without 200 and 20 mM sodium ascorbate in the liquid and lyophilized state respectively.
The samples to be irradiated (both with and without ascorbate) were exposed to e-beam irradiation at an approximate rate of 45 kGy/hour at 77-88° F. The e-beam energy was 7 MeV and a total dose of approximately 45 kGy was given. Control samples consisted of unirradiated samples with and without ascorbate that traveled to and from the irradiation site, and a reference control sample that did not travel to the irradiation site. During transport the samples were kept at 4° C. The samples are shown in Table 5 below:
After irradiation the lyophilized samples were reconstituted with distilled water. All samples were then tested in an anti-human insulin ELISA assay as described in Example 10. Approximate measures of the recovery of antigen-binding activity were performed by hand as the concentration of Ig that produced approximately 50% of the maximum OD.
As seen Table 6 below, when in the liquid state the application of E-beam radiation completely inactivated the Ig. In the presence of ascorbate, there was a clear recovery of activity, but the magnitude was limited.
The lyophilization of the Ig prior to irradiation had a greater effect upon the recovery of activity than the addition of ascorbate alone to the liquid. Approximately 50% of the antigen-binding activity was retained when ascorbate-free Ig was irradiated. The addition of 20 mM ascorbate prior to lyophilization resulted in complete recovery of activity. The results of the ELISA are shown in FIGS. 23A and 23B.
Approximate Antigen-Binding Activity
≈ % Recovery
Having now fully described this invention, it will be understood to those of ordinary skill in the art that the methods of the present invention can be carried out with a wide and equivalent range of conditions, formulations, and other parameters without departing from the scope of the invention or any embodiments thereof. All patents and publications cited herein are hereby fully incorporated by reference in their entirety. The citation of any publication is for its disclosure prior to the filing date and should not be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2832689||Jan 24, 1952||Apr 29, 1958||Research Corp||Preservation of organic materials by irradiation|
|US2920969||Aug 25, 1954||Jan 12, 1960||Gen Electric||Method and means for irradiating foods|
|US2962380||Oct 8, 1956||Nov 29, 1960||Research Corp||Radiation sterilization of fluid food products|
|US3620944||Mar 12, 1968||Nov 16, 1971||Osaka Prefecture||Process of purifying water by irradiating it|
|US3743480||Apr 9, 1971||Jul 3, 1973||Allied Chem||Sterilization of biological fluids|
|US3779706||Oct 4, 1971||Dec 18, 1973||Energy Sciences Inc||Process for bulk sterilization, minimizing chemical and physical damage|
|US4136094||Aug 31, 1977||Jan 23, 1979||The Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Preparation of intravenous human and animal gamma globulins and isolation of albumin|
|US4251437||Oct 26, 1979||Feb 17, 1981||Nordisk Insulinlaboratorium||Process for producing an antihemophilic factor preparation from human blood plasma by irradiating with electromagnetic waves|
|US4282863||Jul 20, 1978||Aug 11, 1981||Beigler Myron A||Methods of preparing and using intravenous nutrient compositions|
|US4330626||Mar 19, 1980||May 18, 1982||The Enzyme Center, Inc.||Method of preparing high-activity, low-bacteria, urease enzyme|
|US4336247||Jul 14, 1980||Jun 22, 1982||Eriksen Arthur E||Body system nutrient material|
|US4370264||Sep 8, 1981||Jan 25, 1983||Biotest-Serum-Institut Gmbh||Method for the cold sterilization of preparations containing blood coagulation factor VIII|
|US4409105||Nov 20, 1981||Oct 11, 1983||Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Dried, sterilized, gamma-globulin-fixed column and a process for preparing the same|
|US4472840||Sep 30, 1982||Sep 25, 1984||Jefferies Steven R||Method of inducing osseous formation by implanting bone graft material|
|US4620908 *||Jun 18, 1984||Nov 4, 1986||Biocell Laboratories, Inc.||Method for destroying microbial contamination in protein materials|
|US4727027||Oct 7, 1985||Feb 23, 1988||Diamond Scientific Co.||Photochemical decontamination treatment of whole blood or blood components|
|US4784850||Sep 4, 1985||Nov 15, 1988||Mutzarei Maabarot||Process for preparing antibodies against E. Coli K-99 antigen from bovine milk|
|US4798611||Oct 14, 1986||Jan 17, 1989||Hancock Jaffe Laboratories||Enhancement of xenogeneic tissue|
|US4865602||Nov 6, 1986||Sep 12, 1989||Collagen Corporation||Gamma irradiation of collagen/mineral mixtures|
|US4931361||Nov 18, 1988||Jun 5, 1990||California Institute Of Technology||Cryoprotective reagents in freeze-drying membranes|
|US4933145||Jun 3, 1988||Jun 12, 1990||Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus for inhibiting glycolysis in blood samples|
|US4946648||Sep 7, 1988||Aug 7, 1990||Biotest Pharma Gmbh||Method of sterilizing plasma or plasma fractions|
|US4963356||Apr 20, 1987||Oct 16, 1990||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Stable antigenic extracts methods|
|US4994237||Nov 13, 1989||Feb 19, 1991||The Beth Israel Hospital Association||Microwave preservation of bioprostheses|
|US5000951||Jan 18, 1990||Mar 19, 1991||Diamond Scientific Company||Multivalent canine distemper virus vaccine|
|US5012503||Nov 4, 1987||Apr 30, 1991||Sumitomo Bakelite Company, Ltd.||Method for sterilization of polyvinyl alcohol gel by γ-ray|
|US5044091||Apr 16, 1990||Sep 3, 1991||Sankyo Company, Limited||Method of preparing a freeze-dried formulation containing a drug|
|US5106619||Jan 10, 1990||Apr 21, 1992||Diamond Scientific Co.||Preparation of inactivated viral vaccines|
|US5134295||Mar 29, 1991||Jul 28, 1992||Waelischmiller Hans||Irradiation apparatus|
|US5185371||Mar 13, 1990||Feb 9, 1993||University Of Southern California||Method for disinfecting red blood cells|
|US5226065||May 10, 1991||Jul 6, 1993||Stericycle, Inc.||Device for disinfecting medical materials|
|US5283034 *||Mar 26, 1992||Feb 1, 1994||Applied Immune Sciences, Inc.||Stabilization of sterilized surfaces for research and medical use|
|US5362442||Jul 22, 1993||Nov 8, 1994||2920913 Canada Inc.||Method for sterilizing products with gamma radiation|
|US5418130||Jul 13, 1993||May 23, 1995||Cryopharm Corporation||Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants|
|US5460962||Jan 4, 1994||Oct 24, 1995||Organogenesis Inc.||Peracetic acid sterilization of collagen or collagenous tissue|
|US5510122||Sep 28, 1994||Apr 23, 1996||The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York||Preparation and use of whole saliva|
|US5548066||Dec 2, 1994||Aug 20, 1996||Central Biomedia, Inc.||Failure of passive transfer immune serum and method of making same|
|US5603894||Oct 31, 1994||Feb 18, 1997||Abbott Laboratories||Method of sterilizing a pharmaceutical composition|
|US5609864||Jun 8, 1994||Mar 11, 1997||Shanbrom; Edward||Preservation of blood, tissues and biological fluids|
|US5637451||Mar 29, 1995||Jun 10, 1997||New York Blood Center, Inc.||Photodynamic treatment of red blood cells with phthalocyanines and red light at higher light fluence rates is protective of red blood cells|
|US5643464||Jun 30, 1995||Jul 1, 1997||Collagen Corporation||Process for preparing a sterile, dry crosslinking agent|
|US5712086||Jun 7, 1995||Jan 27, 1998||New York Blood Center, Inc.||Process for transfusing cell containing fractions sterilized with radiation and a quencher of type I and type II photodynamic reactions|
|US5730933||Apr 16, 1996||Mar 24, 1998||Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.||Radiation sterilization of biologically active compounds|
|US5817528||May 16, 1995||Oct 6, 1998||Therasorb Medizinische Systeme Gmbh||Sterile and pyrogen-free columns containing coupled protein for binding and removal of substances from blood|
|US5856172||Jan 3, 1997||Jan 5, 1999||Quality Technologies, Llc||Preservation of microorganisms in a vial with a cap comprising an immobilized desiccant|
|US5989498||Oct 21, 1996||Nov 23, 1999||St. Jude Medical, Inc.||Electron-beam sterilization of biological materials|
|US6010719||Sep 16, 1997||Jan 4, 2000||Universiteit Gent||Freeze-dried disintegrating tablets|
|US6060233||Apr 15, 1998||May 9, 2000||Biostore New Zealand, Ltd||Methods for the lyophilization of platelets, platelet membranes or erythrocytes|
|US6171549 *||Dec 15, 1995||Jan 9, 2001||Sterisure, Inc.||Method for sterilizing products|
|US6187572||Apr 14, 1993||Feb 13, 2001||Baxter International Inc.||Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants|
|US6190855||Oct 28, 1996||Feb 20, 2001||Baxter International Inc.||Systems and methods for removing viral agents from blood|
|US6197207||May 21, 1997||Mar 6, 2001||Baxter International Inc.||Method of reducing the possibility of transmission of spongiform encephalopathy diseases by blood products|
|US6203544||Nov 18, 1998||Mar 20, 2001||Tutogen Medical, Inc.||Fixation element|
|US6214534||May 24, 1996||Apr 10, 2001||New York Blood Center, Inc.||Biological compositions containing quenchers of type I and type II photodynamic reactions|
|US6235508||Sep 15, 1998||May 22, 2001||Baxter International Inc.||Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants|
|US6258821||Apr 26, 1999||Jul 10, 2001||Medimmune Oncology, Inc.||Compositions comprising trimetrexate and methods of their synthesis and use|
|US6312931 *||Feb 11, 2000||Nov 6, 2001||Purepulse Technologies, Inc.||Protecting molecules in biologically derived compositions while treating with high intensity broad-spectrum pulsed light|
|US6346216 *||May 15, 2000||Feb 12, 2002||Clearant, Inc.||Method for sterilizing products|
|US6358284||Jun 2, 1999||Mar 19, 2002||Med Institute, Inc.||Tubular grafts from purified submucosa|
|US6375989||Dec 10, 1997||Apr 23, 2002||Purdue Research Foundation||Submucosa extracts|
|US6383732||Jun 1, 2000||May 7, 2002||Crosscart, Inc.||Method of preparing xenograft heart valves|
|US6384419||Mar 30, 2000||May 7, 2002||Jrh Biosciences, Inc.||Dry ice substitute for use in dose mapping to ensure proper amounts of gamma irradiation|
|US6461630||Nov 30, 1999||Oct 8, 2002||Stryker Corporation||Terminally sterilized osteogenic devices and preparation thereof|
|US6485723||May 8, 2000||Nov 26, 2002||Purdue Research Foundation||Enhanced submucosal tissue graft constructs|
|US6548242||Jan 10, 2001||Apr 15, 2003||New York Blood Center||Process for the sterilization of biological compositions and the product thereby|
|US20020064807||Nov 14, 2001||May 30, 2002||Badylak Stephen F.||Gastric submucosal tissue as a novel diagnostic tool|
|US20020068267||Jan 10, 2001||Jun 6, 2002||Bernard Horowitz||Process for the sterilization of biological compositions and the product thereby|
|US20020106394||Sep 18, 2001||Aug 8, 2002||Tucker Marjorie M.||Terminally sterilized osteogenic devices and preparation thereof|
|US20020188319||Jun 10, 2002||Dec 12, 2002||Morris Edward J.||Method and apparatus for sealing access|
|US20030068815||May 17, 2002||Apr 10, 2003||Stone Kevin R.||Sterilized xenograft tissue|
|USRE23195||May 7, 1942||Feb 7, 1950||Preserving|
|CA2056619A1||Apr 16, 1991||Oct 17, 1991||Cryopharm Corp||Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants|
|EP0310316A2||Sep 26, 1988||Apr 5, 1989||Beecham Inc.||TGEV-virus of swine as a dog vaccine|
|EP0334679A2||Mar 28, 1989||Sep 27, 1989||National Research Development Corporation||Improvements in or relating to the inactivation of infectious agents|
|EP0808167A1||Feb 9, 1996||Nov 26, 1997||Methodist Health Group, Inc.||Bone graft composition|
|EP0820301A1||Apr 3, 1996||Jan 28, 1998||Methodist Health Group, Inc.||Tissue graft and method for urinary bladder reconstruction|
|EP0919918A2||Nov 25, 1998||Jun 2, 1999||Digital Equipment Corporation||Apparatus for randomly sampling instructions in a processor pipeline|
|JPH11216147A||Title not available|
|SU1321420A1||Title not available|
|WO1990000907A1||Jul 20, 1989||Feb 8, 1990||Univ Salford Business Services||Sterilising methods|
|WO1991016060A1||Apr 16, 1991||Oct 31, 1991||Cryopharm Corp||Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants|
|WO1995003071A1||Jul 22, 1994||Feb 2, 1995||Randall S Kent||Method for sterilizing products|
|WO2000025839A1||Oct 25, 1999||May 11, 2000||Norbert Kuebler||Method for preparing bone material|
|WO2000028552A1||Nov 8, 1999||May 18, 2000||Clean Earth Technologies, Llc||Method and apparatus for photosensitized ultraviolet decontamination of surfaces and aerosol clouds|
|WO2001008611A1||Jun 21, 2000||Feb 8, 2001||Tutogen Medical Gmbh||Implant from osseous material|
|WO2001012318A1||Aug 17, 1999||Feb 22, 2001||Mobile Process Technology Co||Recovery process for oxidation catalyst in the manufacture of aromatic carboxylic acids|
|WO2001032107A2||Oct 30, 2000||May 10, 2001||Kalas Rolf Dieter||Bone implant|
|WO2001032110A2||Oct 30, 2000||May 10, 2001||Tutogen Medical Gmbh||Implant consisting of bone material|
|WO2001045720A1||Dec 5, 2000||Jun 28, 2001||Tutogen Medical Gmbh||Method for producing a bone material enriched with bone growth factors|
|WO2001049219A1||Dec 5, 2000||Jul 12, 2001||Kalas Rolf Dieter||Implant of bone matter|
|WO2001072233A1||Jan 26, 2001||Oct 4, 2001||Karl Koschatzky||Interference screw made of bone material|
|WO2001072244A1||Jan 29, 2001||Oct 4, 2001||Tutogen Medical Gmbh||Implant for cranioplastics|
|WO2001091818A1||Apr 9, 2001||Dec 6, 2001||Bernd Foehlinger||Jaw transplant consisting of natural bone material|
|1||(Abstract of EP091918A2 and EP0919198A3 (Delphion-DERABS Abstract #G1999-304614)).|
|2||A. Dziedzic-Goclawska et al., "Sterilisation of Tissue Allografts," Advances in Tissue Banking, vol. 1, pp. 261-321.|
|3||A. Ingegneri et al., An 11-Year Assessment of 93 Flash-frozen Homograft Valves in the Aortic Position, 1979, pp. 304-307, Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surgeon, vol. 27.|
|4||A. Maeda et al., Effects of Solvent Preservation With or Without Gamma Irradiation on the Material Properties of Canine Tendon Allografts, 1993, pp., 181-189, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 11.|
|5||A. Salehpour et al., Dose-Dependent Response of Gamma Irradiation on Mechanical Properties and Related Biochemical Composition of Goat Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts, 1995, pp. 898-906, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 13.|
|6||A.A. Belov et al., The Influence of γ-radiation on Enzyme Activity of Collalitin in the Process of Storage Dec. 7, 1989, pp. 519-521, All-Union Research Institute of Textile and Haberdashery Industry, Moscow.|
|7||A.D. Kitchen, Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Human Coagulation Proteins, 1989, pp. 223-229, Vox Sang, vol. 56.|
|8||A.G. Chuchalin et al., Clinical Immunosorbents Basing On Space-Network Polymers, 1998, pp. 1524-1529, All Union Research Institute of Chemical Reagents and Chemicals of Special Purity, Moscow.|
|9||A.J.J.C. Bogers et al., Long-Term Results of the Gamma-Irradiation-Preserved Homograft Monocusp for Transannular Reconstruction of the Right-Ventricular Outflow Tract in Tetralogy of Fallot, 1994, pp. 337-339, Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surgeon, vol. 42.|
|10||A.S. Dagli, Correction of Saddle Nose Deformities by Coral Implantation, 1997, pp. 274-276, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, vol. 254.|
|11||A.S. Imamaliev et al., Biological Properties of Bone Tisue Conserved in Plastic Material and Sterilized With Gama Rays, 1974, pp. 129-135, ACTA, Chirurgiae Plasticae, vol. 16, No. 3.|
|12||AABB FDA Liaison Meeting, ABC Newsletter, Dec. 12, 1997, pp. 14.|
|13||Akira Maeda et al., Solvent-dried and Gamma-irradiated Tendon Allografts in Rats, Jul. 1998, pp. 731-736, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 80-B, No. 4.|
|14||Andrezej Komender et al., Some Biological Properties of Bovine Trypsinized Fascia Xenografts, 1981, pp. 485-489, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, vol. 29.|
|15||Andrezej Komender et al., Some Biological Properties of Preserved Bovine Fascia Enriched With Pulverized Calf Cartilage, 1984, pp. 211-219, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, vol. 32.|
|16||Anna Dziedzic-Goclawska et al., Effect of Radiation Sterilization on the Osteoinductive Properties and the Rate of Remodeling of Bone Implants Preserved by Lyophilization and Deep-Freezing, Nov. 1991, pp. 30-37, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 272.|
|17||B. Horowitz et al., Inactivation of Viruses in Labile Blood Derivatives, II. Physical Methods, 1985, pp. 523-527, Transfusion, vol. 25, No. 6.|
|18||Barbara Lüssi-Schlatter et al., Die Antimikrobielle Behandlung von Peroralen Enzympräparaten mit Gamma-Strahlen, Pharmazeutisches Institut der Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule Zürich Galenische Abteilung Summary Only.|
|19||Blakeslee, Sandra, Jan. 20, 2002, The New York Times.|
|20||Blanchy, B.B. et al., Immobilization of Factor VIII on Collagen Membranes, J. Biomedical Materials Research, 20:469-479 (1986) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.).|
|21||Boon-Seng Wong et al., Differential Contribution of Superoxide Dismutase Activity by Prion Protein in Vivo, 2000, pp. 136-139, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 273.|
|22||Boon-Seng Wong et al., Prion Disease: A Loss of Antioxidant Function? 2000, pp. 249-252, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 275.|
|23||Boon-Seng Worg et al., Copper Refolding of Prion Protein, 2000, pp. 1217-124, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 276.|
|24||Boyer, T.D. et al., Radiation Inactivation of Microsomal Glutathione S-Transferase, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 261:16963-16968 (1986).|
|25||Bradley M. Fideler et al., Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Jul. 1994, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 76-A, No. 7.|
|26||Bradley M. Fideler et al., Gamma Irradiation: Effects on Biomechanical Properties of Human Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts, 1995, pp. 643-646, American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 23, No. 5.|
|27||Brian D. Reid, The Sterways Process: a New Approach to Inactivating Viruses Using Gamma Radiation, 1998, pp. 125-130, Biologicals, vol. 26.|
|28||C.W. Smith et al., Mechanical Properties of Tendons: Changes With Sterilization and Preservation, Feb. 1996, pp. 56-61, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 118.|
|29||Carol House et al., Inactivation of Viral Agents in Bovine Serum by Gamma Irradiation, 1990, pp. 737-740, Can. J. Microbiol., vol. 36.|
|30||Ch. Baquey et al., Radiosterilization of Albuminated Polyester Prostheses, May 1987, pp. 185-189, Biomaterials, vol. 8.|
|31||Chanderkar, L.P. et al., Radiation-Induced Changes In Purified Prothrombin and Thrombin, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 706:1-8 (1982) (Elsevier Biomedical Press).|
|32||Chanderkar, L.P. et al., The Involvement of Aromatic Amino Acids in Biological Activity of Bovine Fibrinogen as Assessed by Gamma-Irradiation, Radiation Research, 65:283-291 (1976) (Academic Press. Inc.).|
|33||*||Chin et al, Photochemistry and Photobiology, 65, 432-435, 1997.*|
|34||Chin, S. et al., Virucidal Treatment of Blood Protein Products With UVC Radiation, Photochemistry and Photobiology, 65:432-435 (1997) (American Society for Photobiology).|
|35||D. Tylman, Mechanical Character of Liofilized and Sterilized by Gamma-Rays Bone Tissue, 1996, pp. 229-234, Chirurgia Narzadow Ruchu I, Ortopedia Polska Summary Only.|
|36||D.A. Haig, Further Studies on the Inactivation of the Scrapie Agent by Ultraviolet Light, 1969, pp. 455-457, J. gen. Virol., vol. 5.|
|37||D.E. Wyatt et al., Is There Life After Irradiation? Part I: Inactivation of Biological Contaminants, Jun. 1993, pp. 34-39, BioPharm.|
|38||D.G. Campbell et al., Sterilization of HIV With Irradiation: Relevance to Infected Bone Allografts, 1999, pp. 517-521, Aust. N.Z.J. Surg., vol. 69.|
|39||David J. Cohen et al., The Fate of Aortic Valve Homografts 12 to 17 Years After Implantation, Mar. 1988, pp. 482-484, Chest, vol. 93, No. 3.|
|40||David R. Brown et al., Antioxidant Activity Related to Copper Binding of Native Prion Protein, 2001, pp. 69-76, Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 76.|
|41||David T. Cheung et al., The Effect of gamma-Irradiation on Collagen Molecules, Isolated alpha-chains, and Crosslinked Native Fibers, 1990, pp. 581-589, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 24.|
|42||David T. Cheung et al., The Effect of γ-Irradiation on Collagen Molecules, Isolated α-chains, and Crosslinked Native Fibers, 1990, pp. 581-589, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 24.|
|43||Defeng et al., Sterilization of Silver-Acidum Pipemedicum Skin for the Treatment of Burns by Radioactive Cobalt-60-.Gamma.-Ray, 1995, pp. 406 (Abstract).|
|44||Derwent Publication AN-111469.|
|45||Derwent Publication AN—111469.|
|46||Derwent Publication-AN 2159557.|
|47||Derwent Publication—AN 2159557.|
|48||Derwent Publication-AN 2526936.|
|49||Derwent Publication—AN 2526936.|
|50||Donald J. Prolo et al., Composite Autogeneic Human Cranioplasty: Frozen Skull Supplemental With Fresh Iliac Corticocancellous Bone, Dec. 1984, pp. 846-851, Neurosurgery, vol. 15, No. 6.|
|51||Donald J. Prolo et al., Superior Osteogenesis in Transplanted Allogeneic Canine Skull Following Chemical Sterilization, Aug. 1982, pp. 230-242, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 168.|
|52||Douglas C. Lee et al., A Direct Relationship Between the Partitioning of the Pathogenic Prion Protein and Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Infectivity During the Purification of Plasma Proteins, Apr. 2001, pp. 449-455, Transfusion, vol. 41.|
|53||Duane C. Eichler et al., Radiation Inactivation Analysis of Enzymes, Jul. 15, 1987, pp. 9433-9436, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 262, No. 20.|
|54||E.A. Borisov et al., Protein Degradation During Interphase Death of Thymocytes Induced by Radiation and Dexamethasone, 1990, pp. 519-521 Abstract Only.|
|55||E.A. Dyskin et al., Hemomicrocirculatory Bed in the Wall of Hollow Organs of the Dog Gastrointestinal Tract at Portal Hypertension, pp. 68-73 Abstract Only.|
|56||E.S. Kempner et al., Size Determination of Enzymes by Radiation Inactivation, 1979, pp. 2-10, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 92.|
|57||Edward A. Rittenhouuse et al., Sterilization of Aortic Valve Grafts for Transplantation, Jul . 1970, pp. 1-5, Aortic Valve Grafts for Transplantation, Archives of Surgery, vol. 101, No. 1.|
|58||Edward H. Bedrossian, Jr., HIV and Banked Fascia Lata, 1991, pp. 284-288, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 7, No. 4.|
|59||Elena Quaglio et al., Copper Converts the Cellular Prion Protein Into a Protease-resistant Species That Is Distinct From the Scrapie Isoform, Apr. 6, 2001, pp. 11432-11438, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, No. 14.|
|60||Ernest U. Conrad et al., Transmission of the Hepatitis-C Virus by Tissue Transplantation, Feb. 1995, pp. 214-224, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 77-A, No. 2.|
|61||Everard Munting et al., Effect of Sterilization on Osteoinduction; 1988, pp. 34-38, Acta Orthop Scand, vol. 59, No. 1.|
|62||F.W. Hehrlein et al., Biochemische Veränderungen an Heterologen Aortenklappentransplantaten nach Anwendung Verschiedener Sterilisationsverfahren, pp. 1183-1185, Langenbecks Arch. Chir., Bd. 325 (Kongrebericht) (English Summary found at p. 1183) Abstract Only.|
|63||F.W. Hehrlein et al., Morphologische Utersuchungen an Heterologen Herzklappentransplantaten Unter Verschiedenen Sterilisationsbedingungen, pp. 244-251 (English Summary found at p. 250).|
|64||Fields et al., Susceptibility of Scrapie Agent to Ionizing Radiation, Apr. 5, 1969, pp. 90-91, Nature, vol. 222.|
|65||G. Campalani et al., Aortic Valve Replacement With Frozen Irradiated Homografts, 1989, pp. 558-561, Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surgery, vol. 3.|
|66||G.A. Yarygina, Dose Rate Effect on Survival of Microorganisms Used as Test-Cultures in Radiation Sterilization of Medical Products, 1973, pp. 32-39, Radiats. Tekh., No. 9 (Abstract.|
|67||G.L. Moore et al., Effects of 4000 Rad. Irradiation on the In Vitro Storage Properties of Packed Red Cells, Nov.-Dec. 1985, pp. 583-585, Final Rept., Pub. In Transfusion, vol. 25, No. 6 (Abstract).|
|68||Ghosh, M.M. et al., A Comparison of Methodologies for the Preparation of Human Epidermal-Dermal Composites, Annals of Plastic Surgery; 39:390-404 (1997) (Lippincott-Raven Publishers).|
|69||Guy Beauregard et al., Temperature Dependence of the Radiation Inactivation of Proteins, 1985, pp. 117-120, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 150.|
|70||H. Hiemstra et al., Inactivation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus by Gamma Radiation and its Effect on Plasma and Coagulation Factors, 1991, pp. 32-39, Transfusion, vol. 31, No. 1.|
|71||H. Sato et al., Sterilization of Therapeutic Immunoadsorbents by Ionizing Radiation, 1986, pp. 131-136, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 9, No. 2.|
|72||Hsing-Wen Sung et al. Effects of Various Chemical Sterilization Methods on the Crosslinking and Enzymatic Degradation Characteristics of an Epoxy-Fixed Biological Tissue, Dec. 1996, pp. 376-383, Sterilization of Biological Tissues.|
|73||Hsiue, G. et al., Absorbable Sandwich-Like Membrane for Retinal-Sheet Transplantation, pp. 20-25 (2002) (Wiley Periodicals, Inc).|
|74||J. Baksa et al., The Use of Pig's Skin (xenograft) for the Treatment of Burns, 1976, pp. 138-145, Magyar Traumatologin, vol. 19, Abstract Only.|
|75||J. Jerosch et al., A New Technique for Bone Sterilization, 1989, pp. 117-120, Biomedizinische Technik, Band 34, Heft 5.|
|76||J. Jerosch et al., Influence of Different Rehydration Periods on the Stability and the Water Content of Bone Allografts After Lyophilization, Gamma-Irradiation, and Lipid Extraction, 1994, pp. 335-341, Z. Orthop., vol. 132.|
|77||J.D. Keathley et al., Is There Life After Irradiation? Part 2: Gamma-Irradiated FBS in Cell Culture, Jul./Aug. 1993, pp. 46-52, BioPharm.|
|78||J.F. Kouvalchouk et al., The Use of Sterilized Bone Allografts in Reconstruction After Tumour Resection, 1986, pp. 393-401, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique, vol. 72.|
|79||J.M. White et al., Sterilization of Teeth by Gamma Radiation, Sep. 1994, pp. 1560-1567, J. Dent. Res., vol. 73, No. 9.|
|80||J.R.P. Gibbons et al., Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Initial Mechanical and Material Properties of Goat Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts, 1991, pp. 209-218, J. Orthop Res, vol. 9, No. 2.|
|81||J.R.P. Gibbons et al., Gamma Ray Sterilisation of Homograft Valves, 1969, pp. 353-358, Bulletin De La Societe Internationale De Chirugie, No. 3.|
|82||James R. Malm et al., An Evaluation of Aortic Valve Homografts Sterilized by Electron Beam Energy, Oct. 1967, pp. 471-477, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 54, No. 4.|
|83||James R. Malm et al., Results of Aortic Valve Replacement Utilizing Irradiated Valve Homografts, pp. 740-747, Annals New York Academy of Sciences.|
|84||Jan Parizek et al., Duraplasty With Pretreated Freeze-Dried Sterilized Human Dura Mater, 1990, pp. 135-143, Sbor. ved. Praci LF UK Hradee Kralove, vol. 33.|
|85||Jan Parizek et al., Ovine Pericardium: A New Material For Duraplasty, 1996, pp. 508-513, J. Neurosurg., vol. 84.|
|86||Jensen, J. et al., Membrane-bound Na, K-ATPase: Target Size and Radiation Inactivation Size of Some of Its Enzymatic Reactions, J. Biological Chemistry, 263:18063-18070 (1988) (Am. Soc. for Biochem. And Mol. Biol.).|
|87||K. Pietrucha, New Collagen Implant As Dural Substitute, Apr. 1991, pp. 320-323, Biomaterials, vol. 12.|
|88||Kamat, H.N. et al., Correlation of Structural Alterations in Bovine Fibrinogen with Loss of Clotting Properties After Gamma Irradiation, Radiation Research, 49:381-389 (1972) (Academic Press, Inc.).|
|89||Kempner, E.S. et al., Effect of Invironmental Conditions on Radiation Target Size Analyses, Analytical Biochemistry, 216:451-455 (1994).|
|90||Kempner, E.S. et al., Radiation-Damaged Tyrosinase Molecules are Inactive, Biophysical Journal, 55:159-162 (1989) (Biophysical Society).|
|91||Ken Nakata et al., Reconstruction of the Laterial Ligaments of the Ankle Using Solvent-dried and Gamma-Irradiated Allogeneic Fascia Lata, May 2000, pp. 579-582.|
|92||Konrad Wangerin et al., Behavior of Differently Sterilized Allogenic Lyophilized Cartilage Implants in Dogs, 1987, pp. 236-242, J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. vol. 45.|
|93||Kuijpers, A.J. et al., In vivo Compatibility and Degradation of Crosslinked Gelatin Gels Incorporated in Knitted Dacron, pp. 137-144 (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.).|
|94||L. Callagaro et al., Hollow Fiber Immobilized L-Asparaginase: In Vivo and In Vitro Immunological Studies, 1983, pp. 91-96, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 6, No. 2.|
|95||L. Kerboull et al., In Vitro Study of the Influence of Various Conservation Methods on the Mechanical Properties of Patellar Tendon Allografts, 1991, pp. 751-762, Chirurgie, vol. 117.|
|96||L.V. Polezhaeu et al., Repair of Cranial Defects With Regenerating Bone in Grafting Gamma-Irradiated Bone Filings, pp. 57-60 Summary Only.|
|97||Le Maire, M. et al., Effects of Ionizing Radiations on Proteins, Journal of Biochem., 267:431-439 (1990).|
|98||License Amendment and Procedures for Gamma Irradiation of blood Products, Jun. 22, 1993, pp. 1-18, Dept. of Health & Human Services, Food and Drug Administration.|
|99||Linberg et al., Irradiated Homologous Cartilage For Orbital Reconstruction, Jul. 1980, pp. 457-462, Ophthalmic Surgery, vol. 11.|
|100||Linda Marton et al., Disinfection and Inactivation of the Human T. Lymphotrogic Virus Type III/Lymphadenopathy-Associated Virus, Aug. 1985, pp. 400-403,The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 151, No. 2.|
|101||Liu Bingci, Mouse Antibody Response Following Repetitive Injections of Gamma-Irradiated human Placenta Collagen, Jun. 1994, pp. 100-103, Chinese Medical Sciences Journal, vol. 9, No. 2.|
|102||Luanne H. Elliott et al., Inactivation of Lassa, Marburg, and Ebola Viruses by Gamma Irradiation, Oct. 1982, pp. 704-708, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 16, No. 4.|
|103||M. Horowitz, Sterilization of Homograft Ossicles by Gamma Radiation, Nov. 1979, pp. 1087-1089, The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 93.|
|104||M.F. Alladine et al., gamma-Radiation Damage to Starr-Edwards Valves, Mar. 16, 1968, pp. 68, The Lancet Letters to the Editor.|
|105||M.F. Alladine et al., γ-Radiation Damage to Starr-Edwards Valves, Mar. 16, 1968, pp. 68, The Lancet Letters to the Editor.|
|106||M.J. Goertzen et al., "Sterilisation of Canine Anterior Cruciate Allografts by Gamma Irradiation in Argon," Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Corrections), vo. 77-B, No. 2, Mar. 1995, pp. 205-212.|
|107||M.J. Goertzen et al., Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Cryopreserved Irradiated Bone-ACL-Bone-Allograft Transplants, 1994, pp. 150-157, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, vol. 2.|
|108||M.J. Goertzen et al., Sterilisation of Canine Anterior Cruciate Allografts by Gamma Irradiation in Argon, Mar. 1995, pp. 205-212, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 77-B, No. 2.|
|109||Ma, J.T. et al., Functional Size Analysis of F-ATPase from Escherichia coli by Radiation Inactivation, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268:10802-10807 (1993) (The Am. Soc. for Biochem. and Mol. Bio., Inc.).|
|110||Maria Esther Martinez Pardo et al., Clinical Application of Amniotic Membranes on a Patient With Epidermolysis Bullosa, 1999, pp. 68-73, Annals of Transplantation, vol. 4, No. 3-4.|
|111||Maria Raptopoulou-Gigi et al., Antimicrobial Proteins in Sterilised Human Milk, Jan. 1, 1977, pp. 12-14, British Medical Journal, vol. 1.|
|112||Martindale's Extra Pharmacopoecia, Glucose, pp. 1265.|
|113||Marx, G. Protecting Fibrinogen with Rutin During UVC Irradiation for Viral Inactivation, Photochemistry and Photobiology, 63:541-546 (1996) (American Society for Photobiology).|
|114||McDowell, Sandra, Irradiated Cartilage, Spring 1988, pp. 14-15, Plastic Surgical Nursing.|
|115||Michael L. Baldwin et al., Irradiation of Blood Components, 1992, pp. 1-78, American Association of Blood Banks.|
|116||Nagrani, S. et al., The Radiation-Induced Inactivation of External Yeast Invertase in Dilute Aqueous Solution, Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 55:191-200 (1989) (Taylor & Francis Ltd.).|
|117||Nielsen, M. et al., The Apparent Target Size of Rat Brain Benzodiazepine Receptor, Acetylcholinesterase, and Pyruvate Kinase Is Highly Influenced by Experimental Conditions, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 263:11900-11906 (1988) (The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.).|
|118||Nikolaus Schwarz et al., Irradiation-sterilization of Rat Bone Matrix Gelatin, 1988, pp. 165-167, Acta Orthop Scand, vol. 59, No. 2.|
|119||O. Cornu et al., Effect of Freeze-Drying and Gamma Irradiation on the Mechanical Properties of Human Cancellous Bone, 2000, pp. 426-431, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 18.|
|120||Ole T. Jensen et al., Vertical Guided Bone-Graft Augmentation in a New Canine Mandibular Model, 1995, pp. 335-343, The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 10, No. 3.|
|121||Ozan Akkus et al., Fracture Resistance of Gamma Radiation Sterilized Cortical Bone Allografts, 2001, pp. 927-934, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 19.|
|122||P. Brown et al., Further Studies of Blood Infectivity in an Experimental Model of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy, With an Explanation of Why Blood Components Do Not Transmit Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in Humans, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 1169-1178, Transfusion, vol. 39.|
|123||P. Brown et al., The Distribution of Infectivity in Blood Components and Plasma Derivatives in Experimental Models of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy, Sep. 1998, pp. 810-816, Transfusion, vol. 38.|
|124||P. Brown, The Risk of Blood-Borne Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, 1999, pp. 53-59, Advances in Transfusion Safety Dev. Biol. vol. 102.|
|125||P. De Deyne et al., Some Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Patellar Tendon Allografts, 1991, pp. 51-62, Connective Tissue Research, vol. 27.|
|126||P. Di Simplicio et al., The Reactivity of the SH Group of Bovine Serum Albumin With Free Radicals, 1991, pp. 253-262, Free Rad. Res. Comms., vol. 14, No. 4.|
|127||P.A. Puolakkainen et al., The Effect of Sterilization on Transforming Growth Factor β Isolated From Demineralized Human Bone, 1993, pp. 679-685, Transfusion, vol. 33, No. 8.|
|128||Patel et al., Effect of Gamma Radiation and Ethylene Oxide on Papain, 1979, pp. 81-83, Indian. J. Pharm. Sci., vol. 41, No. 2.|
|129||Paul Brown et al., Effect of Chemicals, Heat, and Histopathologic Processing on High-Infectivity Hamster-Adapted Scrapie Virus, May 1982, pp. 683-687, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 145, No. 5.|
|130||Ph. Hernigou et al., Radiation Sterilization of Bone and the HIV Virus, 1993, pp. 445-451, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique, vol. 79, Summary Only.|
|131||Pollard, The Effect of Ionizing Radiation on Viruses, pp. 65-71.|
|132||Potier, M. et al., Radiation Inactivation of Proteins: Temperature-Dependent Inter-Protomeric Energy Transfer in Ox Liver Catalase, Biochem. J., 298:571-574 (1994).|
|133||Qi Zhang et al., Ethylene Oxide Does Not Extinguish the Osteoinductive Capacity of Demineralized Bone, 1997, pp. 104-108, Acta Orthop Scand, vol. 68, No. 2.|
|134||R. Guidoin et al., A Compound Arterial Prosthesis: The Importance of the Sterilization Procedure on the Healing and Stability of Albuminated Polyester Grafts, Mar. 1985, pp. 122-128, Biomaterials, vol. 6.|
|135||R. Latarjet et al., Inactivation of the Scrapie Agent by Near Monochromatic Ultraviolet Light, Sep. 26, 1970, pp. 1341-1343, Nature, vol. 227.|
|136||R.G. Burwell, The Fate of Freeze-Dried Bone Allografts, Jun. 1976, pp. 95-111, Transplantation Proceedings, vol. VII, No. 2, Supplement 1.|
|137||R.G. Rohwer, The Scrapie Agent: "A Virus by Any Other Name", pp. 195-232, Current Topics In Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 172.|
|138||R.H. Bassin et al., Abrogation of Fv-1<b >Restriction With Murine Leukemia Viruses Inactivated by heat or by Gamma Irradiation, May 1978, pp. 306-315, Journal of Virology, vol. 26, No. 2.|
|139||R.H. Bassin et al., Abrogation of Fv-1b Restriction With Murine Leukemia Viruses Inactivated by heat or by Gamma Irradiation, May 1978, pp. 306-315, Journal of Virology, vol. 26, No. 2.|
|140||R.I. Vaida et al., Structural-Functional Peculiarities of Myocardial Capillaries After Resection of the Lungs, Oct. 21, 1986, pp. 68-73 Summary Only.|
|141||R.J. Donnelly et al., Gamma-radiation of Heart Valves at 4° C; A Comparative Study Using Techniques of Histochemistry and Electron and Light Microscopy, 1978, pp. 95-101.|
|142||Raymond Latarjet, Inactivation of the Agents of Scrapie, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, and Kuru by Radiations, 1979, pp. 387-407, Slow Transmissible Diseases of the Nervous System, vol. 2.|
|143||Richard A. Smith et al., Gamma Irradiation of HIV-1, 2001, pp. 815-819, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 19.|
|144||Richard Hinton et al., A Biomechanical Analysis of Solvent-dehydrated and Freeze-Dried Human Fascia Lata Allografts, 1992, pp. 607-612, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 20, No. 5.|
|145||Robert G. Rohwer et al., Scrapie-Virus or Viroid, The Case For A Virus, pp. 333-355, Laboratory of Central Nervous System Studies, National Institutes of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health.|
|146||Robert G. Rohwer et al., Scrapie—Virus or Viroid, The Case For A Virus, pp. 333-355, Laboratory of Central Nervous System Studies, National Institutes of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health.|
|147||Robert G. Rohwer, Estimation of Scrapie Nucleic Acid MW From Standard Curves for Virus Sensitivity to Ionizing Radiation, Mar. 27, 1986, pp. 381, Nature, vol. 320, No. 6060.|
|148||Robert G. Rohwer, Scrapie Infectious Agent is Virus-like in Size and Susceptibility to Inactivation, Apr. 12, 1984, pp. 658-662, Nature, vol. 308.|
|149||Robert G. Rohwer, Virus-Like Sensitivity of the Scrapie Agent to heat Inactivation, Feb. 10, 1984, pp. 600-602, Science, vol. 223.|
|150||Robert J. Woods, "Food Irradiation," Endeavor, New Series, vol. 18, No. 3, 1994, pp. 104-108.|
|151||Robert Sullivan et al. Inactivation of Thiry Viruses by Gamma Radiation, Jul. 1971, pp. 61-65, Applied Microbiology, vol. 22, No. 1.|
|152||Ronald W. Katz et al., Radiation-Sterilized Insoluble Collagenous Bone Matrix is a Functional Carrier of Osteogenin for Bone Induction, 1990, pp. 183-185, Calcified Tissue International, vol. 47.|
|153||S. Malawaski et al., The Use of Dry-Freezed Bone Grafts Sterilized by Gamma Rays in Orthopaedic Surgery, 1969, pp. 61-68, Chir. Narz. Ruchu Ortop. Summary Only.|
|154||S. Wientroub et al., Influence of Irradiation on the Osteoinductive Potential of Demineralized Bone Matrix, 1988, pp. 255-260, Calicified Tissue International, vol. 42.|
|155||S.C. Roe et al., The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on a Xenograft Tendon Bioprothesis, 1992, pp. 149-154, Clinical Materials, vol. 9.|
|156||S.I. Miekka et al., New Methods for Inactivation of Lipid-enveloped and Non-enveloped Viruses, 1998, pp. 402-408, Haemophilia, vol. 4.|
|157||S.R. Aparicio et al., Light and Electron Microscopy Studies on Homograft and Heterograft Heart Valves, 1975, pp. 174-162, J. Path., vol. 115.|
|158||Sakai, T. et al., Microbiological Studies on Drugs and Their Raw Materials. IV. Sterilization of Microbial Contaminants in Enzyme Powder by Gamma Irradiation, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 26:1130-1134 (1978).|
|159||Salim-Hanna, M. et al., Free Radical Scavenging Activity Of Carnosine, Free Rad. Res. Comms., 14:263-270 (1991) (Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH).|
|160||Seymour S. Block, Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, Fundamental Principles of Activity, Principles of Antimicrobial Activity, Fourth Edition, 1991, pp. 31-33.|
|161||Shcheglova et al. The Effect of the Power of Gamma-Radiation on the Radiation Dose in the Sterilization of Drugs, 1984, pp. 730-732, Khim-Farm Zh, vol. 18, No. 6 (Abstract).|
|162||Shinichiro Ijiri et al., Effect of Sterilization on Bone Morphogenetic Protein, 1994, pp. 628-636, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 12.|
|163||Slawomir Gregorczyn et al., Strength of Lyophilized and Irradiated Cortical Bone of the Human Femur, 1995, pp. 129-133, Chir. Narz. Ruchu Ortop. Pol., Lx 2 Abstract Only.|
|164||Song, K.B. et al., Effect of Gamma-irradiation on the Physicochemical Properties of Blood Plasma Proteins, 2002 Annual Meeting and Food Expo-Anaheim, California, Session 30C-1, Food and Chemistry: Proteins, (Jun. 2002) (Abstract).|
|165||Suomela, H., Inactivation of Viruses in Blood and Plasma Products, Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 7:42-57 (1993) (W.B. Saunders Company).|
|166||Susan F. Leitman, Use of Blood Cell Irradiation in the Prevention of Posttransfusion Graft-vs-Host Disease, 1989, pp. 219-232, Transfus. Sci., vol. 10.|
|167||T.J. Rasmussen et al., The Effects of 4 Mrad of Gamma-Irradiation on the Initial Mechanical Properties of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts, 1994, pp. 188-197, The Journal of Arthroscoic and Related Surgery, vol. 10, No. 2.|
|168||The Merck Index, Eleventh Edition Glucose, pp. 4353-4354.|
|169||Tikvah Alper et al., Does the Agent of Scrapie Replicate Without Nucleic Acid? May 20, 1967, pp. 764-766, Nature, vol. 214.|
|170||Tikvah Alper et al., Protection by Anoxia of the Scrapie Agent and Some DNA and RNA Viruses Irradiated as Dry Preparations, 1968, pp. 157-166, J. gen. Virol., vol. 3.|
|171||Tikvah Alper et al., The Exceptionally Small Size of the Scrapie Agent, 1966, pp. 278-284, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 22, No. 3.|
|172||Tikvah Alper et al., The Scrapie Agent: Evidence Against its Dependence For Replication on Intrinsic Nucleic Acid, 1978, pp. 503-516, J. gen. Virol., vol. 41.|
|173||U. Ripamonti et al., Long-Term Evaluation of Bone Formation by Osteogenic Protein 1 in the Baboon and Relative Efficacy of Bone-Derived Bone Morphogenetic Proteins Delivered by Irradiated Xenogeneic Collagenous Matrices, 2000, pp. 1798-1809, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 15, No. 9.|
|174||W. Oh et al., Mitral Valve Replacement With Preserved Cadaveric Aortic Homografts, May 1973, pp. 712-721, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 65, No. 5.|
|175||W. Welch, A Comparative Study of Different Methods of Processing Aortic Homografts, 1969, pp. 746-749, Thorax, vol. 24.|
|176||Website: www.benvue,com/history/history_content.html, (2002).|
|177||Website: www.phase-technologies.com/html/vol.1no10.html , Jennings, T.A., (Yes, You have no Eutectic) (1998).|
|178||Website: www.phase-technologies.com/html/vol.1no2.html , Jennings, T.A., (Role of Product Temperature in the Lyophilization Process) (1998).|
|179||Website: www.phase-technologies.com/html/vol.1no7.html , Jennings, T.A., (Which Shelf Temperature During Lyophilization?) (1998).|
|180||Website: www.phase-technologies.com/html/vol.1no9.html , Jennings, T.A., (Overview of the Lyophilization Process) (1998).|
|181||Website: www.phase-technologies.com/html/vol.2no1.html , Jennings, T.A., (Glossary of Terms for Lyophilization) (1999).|
|182||Website: www.phase-technologies.com/html/vol.2no2.html , Jennings, T.A., (What I Wish I Knew About Lyophilization) (1999).|
|183||Website: www.usacc.org/ataccc/ppt.html, (Advanced Technology Applications for Combat Casualty Care, 2001 Presentations, US Army Medical Research and Material Command Combat Casualty CareResearch Program (2001)).|
|184||Website: www.usacc.org/RevisedStepB.html, Bakaltcheva, I. et al., (FY01 Request for Proposals-Intramural-Revised 2, Combat Casualty Care Research Program, (2002)).|
|185||Website: www.wslfweb.org/docs/dstp2000.dtopdf/19-MD.pdf (Defense Science and Technology Plans, (Feb. 2000) p. 176, Section II, MD.03, U.S. Department of Defense Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Science and Technology)).|
|186||Yongxing Zhang et al., A Comprehensive Study of Physical Parameters, Biomechanical Properties and Statistical Correlations of Iliac Crest Bone Wedges Used in Spinal Fusion Surgery, 1994, pp. 304-308, Spine, vol. 19, No. 3.|
|187||Yukiyoshi Toritsuka et al., Effect of Freeze-Drying or γ-Irradiation on Remodeling of Tendon Allograft in a Rat Model, 1997, pp. 294-300, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 15.|
|188||Z. Mark Plavsic et al., Resistance of Porcine Circovirus to Gamma Irradiation, Apr. 2001, pp. 32-36, BioPharm.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7252799 *||Aug 31, 2001||Aug 7, 2007||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing preparations containing albumin|
|US8236538 *||Dec 17, 2008||Aug 7, 2012||Advanced Technologies And Regenerative Medicine, Llc||Methods for sterilizing materials containing biologically active agents|
|US8574897||Jun 8, 2012||Nov 5, 2013||DePuy Synthes Products, LLC||Methods for sterilizing materials containing biologically active agents|
|US8580192||Oct 31, 2006||Nov 12, 2013||Ethicon, Inc.||Sterilization of polymeric materials|
|US8585965||Nov 26, 2012||Nov 19, 2013||Ethicon, Inc.||Sterilization of polymeric materials|
|US20030180181 *||Apr 29, 2002||Sep 25, 2003||Teri Greib||Methods for sterilizing tissue|
|US20030213920 *||Aug 31, 2001||Nov 20, 2003||Miekka Shirley I.||Methods for sterilizing preparations containing albumin|
|US20040013561 *||Jul 18, 2002||Jan 22, 2004||David Mann||Methods for sterilizing recombinant or transgenic material|
|US20040126880 *||Jun 6, 2003||Jul 1, 2004||Manders Ernest K.||Sterilization, stabilization and preservation of functional biologics|
|US20060182652 *||Apr 7, 2006||Aug 17, 2006||Clearant Inc.||Methods for sterilizing biological materials using dipeptide stabilizers|
|US20080080998 *||Jul 16, 2007||Apr 3, 2008||Clearant, Inc.||Methods for sterilizing tissue|
|US20080101982 *||Oct 31, 2006||May 1, 2008||Ethicon, Inc.||Sterilization of polymeric materials|
|US20090166178 *||Dec 17, 2008||Jul 2, 2009||Ethicon, Incorporated||Methods for sterilizing materials containing biologically active agents|
|US20110091353 *||Dec 2, 2010||Apr 21, 2011||Wilson Burgess||Methods for Sterilizing Tissue|
|U.S. Classification||424/176.1, 422/23, 436/548, 422/22, 530/390.1, 422/21|
|International Classification||A61K47/18, A61K39/395, C07K16/26, A61K47/20, C07K16/06, A61P43/00, A61L2/00, A61K47/22, C07K16/42, A61K47/14|
|Cooperative Classification||A61L2/0011, C07K16/065, A61K39/39591, C07K16/26, A61L2/0035, C07K16/4283, A61L2/0029, A61L2/0082, A61L2202/24|
|European Classification||A61L2/00P2, C07K16/06A, A61L2/00P4, C07K16/42M, C07K16/26, A61K39/395S, A61L2/00P2R2|
|Jan 10, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CLEARANT, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GRIEB, TERI;BURGESS, WILSON H.;DROHAN, WILLIAM N.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:012448/0078;SIGNING DATES FROM 20011219 TO 20011220
|Sep 3, 2007||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Feb 1, 2008||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Feb 1, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 10, 2011||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Feb 24, 2012||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Apr 17, 2012||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20120224