Shadowman wrote:You could have picked better articles. Like, ones where the first point doesn't express uncertainty as to which one Bumblebee is, or keeps saying they don't explain certain things that are actually well explained.
Tough talk coming from someone who read less than 1/4 of the given material.
Shadowman wrote:The plot of the movie is fine.
Which one? The first had about an hour of meaningless pseudo-plot about computer viruses and barbecued gators that ultimately went absolutely nowhere. The second was.. well, the storytelling was so beyond horrible that I didn't even have the chance to catch the smaller plot holes because my brain was constantly reeling from the barrage of huge plot holes. The third seemed good enough for a while, but then the entire last hour was just random footage from Battle: Los Angeles
. So... which one had a plot that you'd call "fine"?
Shadowman wrote:Jetfire, for instance, is a is a crotchety old ball of Win, and I actually really liked this incarnation of Wheelie.
Jetfire is an annoying attempt at comic relief and his G1 cartoon counterpart is easily a hundred times more worthy of the silver screen
ever being seen or heard from again.
Shadowman wrote:Most of the returning humans (Simmons and NEST in particular) are fine.
True... "useless but inoffensive" is easily preferable to "useless and offensive".
Burn wrote:No, you linked to an OPINIONATED article.
Answer me this truthfully. Do you understand the following sentence?
"Opinion does NOT equal fact".
Do you understand the following sentences?
"A forum is a place for people to express opinions"
"A plot that is nothing more than a 2-and-a-half-hour-long parade of contrivances, coincidences, contradictions, holes, potty humor, and irrelevant nonsense is basically a crap worthless plot"