Re: [PanoToolsNG] Announcement: PTStitcherNG0.4b
- Hello Keith,
I guess the problem that you and Willy encounter are identical, I
inspected his template and found out that several lines in his PTGui
projekt are different from mine with different params but I found also
that the output that is sent to PTStitcherNG is almost identical.
I suggest that you post a message on the PTStitcherNG0.4b topic on the
Or perhaps Joost is willing to do some research why a valid script is
not working with PTStitcherNG.
2010/1/1 Keith Martin-2 [via PanoToolsNG]
> Sometime around 31/12/09 (at 06:41 -0800) Wim Koornneef said:--
>>it seems to me that
>>there are no more compatibility issues when using PTStitcherNG with PTGui.
> When I try PTGui projects that use fullframe fisheye images then
> PTStitcherNG0.4b runs as described - and it is awesomely fast!
> Unfortunately, my experience with my current images is not as
> successful. I'm using a full-frame sensor and shaved 10.5mm lens, so
> I get a partial circular image (the circle is larger than the sensor
> width) that has a crop circle defined. When I use PTStitcherNG0.4b to
> process a PTGui project with these images I get the same old message
> about the panorama not being made.
> If source images and PTGui project files would be of interest I'll
> make them available for download.
> View message @
> To unsubscribe from Re: Announcement: PTStitcherNG0.4b, click here.
View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Announcement-PTStitcherNG0-4b-tp991368p991887.html
Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- I am a new Hugin User and I have encountered a vexing problem.
I have a six sequence set of long distance pictures taken in Alaska of the Wrangel-St Elias National Park. When I use CS3 to stitch the result is fairly pleasing (color and exposure wise).
However, when I used Hugin and select optimize "Exposure", the "Blend" across the sequence is weird. The anchor pic (pic 1) is VERY much lighter than the other five and there is a obvious blend seam. The exposure for pictures 2 thru 6 are uniform (somewhat dark, but uniform). The exposure for pic 1 is pleasing but is much brighter than the other five.