|Publication number||US7300597 B2|
|Application number||US 11/535,551|
|Publication date||27 Nov 2007|
|Filing date||27 Sep 2006|
|Priority date||8 Aug 2003|
|Also published as||US7309448, US20050029229, US20070020944|
|Publication number||11535551, 535551, US 7300597 B2, US 7300597B2, US-B2-7300597, US7300597 B2, US7300597B2|
|Inventors||Hee Yeop Chae, Jeremiah T. P. Pender, Gerardo A. Delgadino, Xiaoye Zhao, Yan Ye|
|Original Assignee||Applied Materials, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (16), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (12), Classifications (17), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/706,902, filed Nov. 12, 2003, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/493,824, filed Aug. 8, 2003. Each of the aforementioned related patent applications is herein incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a method of removing a sacrificial light absorbing material and polymer residues that may remain on a substrate surface and inside openings during damascene structure preparation.
2. Description of the Related Art
Integrated circuits have evolved into complex devices that can include millions of components (e. g., transistors, capacitors and resistors) on a single chip. The evolution of chip designs continually requires faster circuitry and greater circuit density. The demands for greater circuit density necessitate a reduction in the dimensions of the integrated circuit components.
A dual damascene process is used to create the multi-level, high density metal interconnections needed for advanced, high performance integrated circuits (ICs). The initial transition to dual damascene employed copper metal with traditional silicon dioxide dielectric. More recently, the trend has moved toward the replacement of silicon dioxide dielectric with new low-k dielectric materials, such as carbon doped oxide (CDO).
The adoption of dual damascene copper metallization posed many challenges to the patterning process. Unacceptable variations in substrate reflectivity inhibited the well-controlled patterning of line and space on glass-like interlayer dielectric (ILD). Use of antireflective coating materials to suppress substrate reflectivity is a common practice in the industry. However, applying this technique to dual damascene patterning for sub-0.18 micron technology faces serious challenges in defect elimination and post-etch feature profile control.
A new material known as a sacrificial light absorbing material (SLAM) has recently been developed as an alternative to anti-reflective coating to address the problems mentioned above. SLAM has the light absorbing characteristics that suppress substrate reflectivity. It could be a dyed spin-on-glass (“SOG”) or a dyed spin-on-polymer (“SOP”) that is deposited by spin coating onto the substrate surface. Various methods of forming a dual damascene interconnect structure using SLAM are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,185, titled “Method for Making a Semiconductor Device That Has a Dual Damascene Interconnect”, issued Sep. 10, 2002, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,365,529, titled “Method for Patterning Dual Damascene Interconnects Using a Sacrificial Light Absorbing Material”, issued Apr. 2, 2002.
The SLAM-based dual damascene processes mentioned above address defect elimination and post-etch feature profile control issues. However, the process requires a wet clean step to remove the remaining SLAM and etch residue. A wet clean step in a separate process system is time consuming and is limiting in its capability to control the post-etch feature profile. The term “etch” as recited herein is used broadly to include any material removal processes.
Therefore, a need exists in the art for a method of dry cleaning the sacrificial light absorbing material (SLAM) residue and post-etch polymer residue formed during the dual damascene patterning process.
The present invention generally relates to a method of dry etching sacrificial light absorbing material (SLAM) residue and photoresist residue formed during fabrication of devices and interconnect structures that use SLAM during the fabrication process.
Embodiments of the invention provide a plasma etch process for selectively etching a SLAM over a dielectric material on a substrate, which comprises etching a layer of SLAM that lies atop a dielectric layer using a gas mixture comprising a hydrofluorocarbon gas, an optional hydrogen-containing gas, an optional fluorine-rich fluorocarbon gas, a nitrogen-containing gas, an oxygen-containing gas and an inert gas. The sacrificial light absorbing material is, for example, TESAC dyed methylsiloxane polymer. The dielectric material is, for example, a carbon doped oxide with 1 to 50% atomic weight carbon content.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.
The invention is described within the context of a method of forming a dual damascene structure. Although use of the invention to form a dual damascene structure is one embodiment of the invention, those skilled in the art will understand that the invention may find use in any embodiment where sacrificial light absorbing material (SLAM) residue is etched.
Barrier layer 102 will serve to prevent an unacceptable amount of copper, or other metal, from diffusing into dielectric layer 103. Barrier layer 102 also acts as an etch stop layer (ESL) to prevent subsequent via and trench etch steps from exposing conductive layer 101 to subsequent etching and cleaning processes. Barrier layer 102 could be made from silicon nitride, silicon carbide or other suitable materials. Barrier layer 102 should be thick enough to perform its diffusion inhibition and etch stop functions, but not so thick that it adversely impacts the overall dielectric characteristics of the combined barrier layer 102 and dielectric layer 103.
A dielectric layer 103 is then formed on top of the barrier layer 102. The dielectric layer 103 could be up-doped silicon glass (USG), fluorine-doped silicon glass (FSG), silicon dioxide, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or a carbon doped oxide (CDO) film. For convenience, carbon doped oxide (CDO) will be used as an example in many occasions below to describe the invention. Carbon doped silicon oxide (CDO) is an oxidized organo-silane material. The organo-silane compounds are oxidized during deposition by reaction with oxygen (O2) or oxygen containing compounds such as nitrous oxide (N2O) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), such that the carbon content of the film is from 1% to 50% by atomic weight, and in one specific embodiment is about 20%. The oxidized organo-silane layer has a dielectric content of about 3.0. Carbon, including some organo functional groups, remaining in the oxidized organo layer contributes to low dielectric constants and good barrier properties providing a barrier that inhibits for example diffusion of moisture or metallic compounds. Examples of CDO include BLACK DIAMOND™ available from Applied Materials, Inc. located in Santa Clara, Calif., Coral™, available from Novellus Systems, located in San Jose, Calif., and Aurora™, available from ASM International, located in Amsterdam. Details of methods of preparing the BLACK DIAMOND™ film have been disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/121,284, titled “Crosslink Cyclo-Siloxane Compound With Linear Bridging Group To Form Ultra Low K Dielectric”, filed on Apr. 11, 2002, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/302,393, titled “Method For Forming Ultra Low K Films Using Electron Beam”, filed on Nov. 22, 2002. Typically, the thickness of the dielectric layer is between about 2,000 and about 30,000 angstroms.
After forming dielectric layer 103, a photoresist layer 130 is deposited on top of the dielectric layer to define a via formation. An optional hard mask layer can be deposited on the dielectric layer before the photoresist layer 130 is formed. Such a hard mask may be desirable when using certain types of material to form dielectric layer 103, as is well known to those skilled in the art. This particular embodiment does not specify forming a hard mask layer on top of dielectric layer 103 prior to applying the photoresist.
After photoresist 130 is conventionally patterned (shown in
After via 107 is formed through dielectric layer 103, via 107 is filled with a sacrificial light absorbing material (“SLAM”) layer 104 (see
SLAM layer 104 could be a dyed spin-on-glass (SOG) or a dyed spin-on-polymer (SOP) that is deposited by spin coating. An example of a SLAM material is DUO248™ made by Honeywell Electronic Materials, Sunnyvale, Calif. DUO248™ is an antireflective polymer comprised of TESAC (9-Anthracene Carboxymethyl Triethoxysilane) and Methylsiloxane. The design of the material is described in an article, titled “An Anthracene-Organosiloxane Spin on Antireflective Coating for KrF Lithorgraphy” SPIE 28th Annual Microlithography Conference, Feb. 23, 2003. Typically, about 500 and about 3,000 angstroms of the material is deposited onto the surface of the device. The spin coating process causes the SLAM layer 104 to completely fill the via 107 uniformly. The dyed SOG or SOP greatly reduces, or even eliminates, substrate reflectivity at deep ultraviolet (DUV) wavelengths (157, 193 or 248 nm).
After filling the via 107 with SLAM, a photoresist layer 130 is applied on top of the SLAM layer 104. The photoresist layer 130 is then patterned to define a trench formation (see
The presence of the remaining portion 109 of the SLAM layer 104, at the bottom the via 107 after trench etch, helps to protect the barrier layer during the trench etch process. Due to this, the trench etch process can be selected to produce superior trench and via profiles without having to consider its effect on the selectivity between the dielectric layer 103 (e.g. a CDO layer) and the barrier layer 102.
After the trench 106 is etched, the remaining portion of the photoresist layer 130 and the remaining portion 109 of the SLAM layer 104 must be removed. If a low temperature, low pressure oxygen based ashing step is used to remove the photoresist layer 130, followed by applying a wet etch process to remove remaining residues, the ashing and clean process may have to be repeated to adequately remove the photoresist and the SLAM residues. In addition to requiring a significant amount of time to complete, such a process is relatively expensive and can modify the etch profile in an unacceptable fashion. Moreover, the oxygen used during an ashing process may react with the carbon, which is contained in the dielectric layer 103, to produce carbon dioxide that is released from the device. Because that reaction depletes the carbon that is included in the dielectric layer, it may cause that layer's dielectric constant to increase significantly, and render the dielectric layer susceptible to cracking and delamination.
For these reasons, a method of employing a forming gas to remove the photoresist layer 130 has been described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,185, titled “Method for Making a Semiconductor Device That Has a Dual Damascene Interconnect”, issued Sep. 10, 2002. The forming gas in one specific embodiment comprises a plasma that contains hydrogen. Such a hydrogen containing plasma comprises 4% hydrogen in nitrogen in equipment capable of performing the ashing process. Removal of photoresist layer 130 generates the structure shown in
Following the photoresist removal step, remaining portions 109 of the SLAM layer 104 must be removed. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,185, this is described to be accomplished by exposing the device to a dilute HF solution that wet etches the SLAM layer at a significantly higher rate than it may wet etch dielectric layer 103 (greater than 10:1). Such a solution comprises a blend of ethylene glycol (or deionized water) and HF in a ratio of between about 6:1 and about 500:1. A wet etch process that uses such a solution removes the remaining SLAM at a substantially faster rate than it removes any of the CDO.
However, wet etch is performed in a separate equipment from the etch system. Transporting wafers and waiting for the wet etch process queue could be time consuming. Dry etch also generally provides better process control. Therefore, it's more desirable to remove the remaining SLAM using a dry etch process to save overall process time and better control the process.
In addition to eliminating a wet etch step, it is also desirable to have a dry etch process that combines the photoresist ashing step with the SLAM removal step. DUV (248 nm) photoresists typically consist of terpolymers or copolymer of polyhydroxystyrene (PHS) of varying ratios of copolymers and monomeric inhibitors. An example of DUV resist is Apex-EŽ by Shipley, located in Marlborough, Mass. Since SLAM, such as DUO248™ is also a polymer, the etch process developed to etch SLAM should also be able to etch DUV photoresist.
This invention is a highly selective plasma etch process of SLAM over the dielectric material (such as CDO). The plasma process utilizes a mixture of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC), fluorocarbon (optional), oxygen, nitrogen and inert gases to achieve higher than 5:1 selectivity, preferably higher than 10:1, and at an etch rate greater than 200 angstrom per minute, preferably greater than 500 angstrom per minute. The preference of greater than 10:1 etch selectivity allows the removal of SLAM without significant loss of CDO. The etch rate also needs to be high enough (>500 angstrom per minute) to make the process useful in manufacturing integrated circuits.
The dry etch (or clean) process may be practiced, for example, in a dual frequency capacitive plasma source reactor. The dual frequency capacitive plasma source reactor may be included in a processing system such as the CENTURAŽ semiconductor wafer processing system commercially available from Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif. The reactor and the specific SLAM removal processes performed in the reactor are discussed in detail below.
Following removal of the remaining portion 109 of the SLAM layer 104, trench 106 and via 107 are filled with second conductive layer 105. Like conductive layer 101, conductive layer 105 for example comprises copper, and is formed using, for example, a conventional copper electroplating process. When an excess amount of the material used to make layer 105 is formed on the surface of dielectric layer 103, one or more chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) steps may be applied to remove the excess material and to planarize the surface of layer 105. When an electroplating process is used to form conductive layer 105 from copper, that CMP step (or steps) removes both the excess copper and the underlying barrier layer.
In one embodiment of the invention, the reactor used to remove the SLAM is adapted for processing 300 mm wafers, operates in broad ranges of the process parameters and etchant chemistries, may use an endpoint detection system, and has in-situ self-cleaning capabilities. In one embodiment, the reactor uses a VHF (very high frequency) plasma source to produce a high density plasma, a 13.56 MHz wafer bias source and a plasma magnetizing solenoid, such that the reactor provides independent control of ion energy, plasma density and uniformity, and wafer temperature. A detailed description of a suitable dual frequency capacitive plasma source reactor is provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/192,271, filed Jul. 9, 2002 (Attorney Docket Number 6767) which is commonly assigned to Applied Materials, Inc., and is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The electrostatic chuck 226 is controlled by a DC power supply 220 and the support pedestal 216, through a matching network 224, which is coupled to a bias source 222. Optionally, the source 222 may be a DC or pulsed DC source. The upper electrode 228 is coupled to a radio-frequency (RF) source 218 through an impedance transformer 219 (e.g., a quarter wavelength matching stub). The bias source 222 is generally capable of producing a RF signal having a tunable frequency of 50 kHz to 13.56 MHz and a power of between 0 and 5000 Watts. The source 218 is generally capable of producing a VHF RF signal having a tunable frequency of about 100 to about 200 MHz and a power between about 0 and about 2000 Watts. The interior of the chamber 210 is a high vacuum vessel that is coupled through a throttle valve 227 to a vacuum pump 236. Those skilled in the art will understand that other forms of the plasma etch chamber may be used to practice the invention, including a reactive ion etch (RIE) chamber, an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) chamber, and the like.
In operation, a substrate 200 is placed on the support pedestal 216, the chamber interior is pumped down to a near vacuum environment, and a gas 250 (e.g., argon), when ignited produces a plasma, is provided to the process chamber 210 from a gas panel 238 via the showerhead 232. The gas 250 is ignited into a plasma 252 in the process chamber 210 by applying the power from the RF source 218 to the upper electrode 228 (anode). A magnetic field is applied to the plasma 252 via the solenoid segment(s) 212, and the support pedestal 216 is biased by applying the power from the bias source 222. During processing of the substrate 200, the pressure within the interior of the etch chamber 210 is controlled using the gas panel 338 and the throttle valve 227.
The temperature of the chamber wall 230 is controlled using liquid-containing conduits (not shown) that are located in and around the wall. Further, the temperature of the substrate 200 is controlled by regulating the temperature of the support pedestal 216 via a cooling plate (not shown) having channels formed therein for circulating a coolant. Additionally, a back side gas (e.g., helium (He) gas) is provided from a gas source 248 into channels, which are formed by the back side of the substrate 200 and the grooves (not shown) in the surface of the electrostatic chuck 226. The helium gas is used to facilitate a heat transfer between the pedestal 216 and the substrate 200. The electrostatic chuck 226 is heated by a resistive heater (not shown) within the chuck body to a steady state temperature and the helium gas facilitates uniform heating of the substrate 200. Using thermal control of the chuck 226, the substrate 200 is maintained at a temperature of between 10 and 500 degrees Celsius.
A controller 240 may be used to facilitate control of the chamber 210 as described above. The controller 240 may be one of any form of a general purpose computer processor used in an industrial setting for controlling various chambers and sub-processors. The controller 240 comprises a central processing unit (CPU) 244, a memory 242, and support circuits 246 for the CPU 244 and coupled to the various components of the etch process chamber 210 to facilitate control of the etch process. The memory 242 is coupled to the CPU 244. The memory 242, or computer-readable medium, may be one or more of readily available memory such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), floppy disk, hard disk, or any other form of digital storage, local or remote. The support circuits 246 are coupled to the CPU 244 for supporting the processor in a conventional manner. These circuits include cache, power supplies, clock circuits, input/output circuitry and subsystems, and the like. A software routine 204, when executed by the CPU 244, causes the reactor to perform processes of the present invention and is generally stored in the memory 242. The software routine 204 may also be stored and/or executed by a second CPU (not shown) that is remotely located from the hardware being controlled by the CPU 244.
The software routine 204 is executed after the substrate 200 is positioned on the pedestal 216. The software routine 204, when executed by the CPU 244, transforms the general purpose computer into a specific purpose computer (controller) 240 that controls the chamber operation such that the etching process is performed. Although the process of the present invention is discussed as being implemented as a software routine, some of the method steps that are disclosed therein may be performed in hardware as well as by the software controller. As such, the invention may be implemented in software as executed upon a computer system, in hardware as an application specific integrated circuit or other type of hardware implementation, or a combination of software and hardware.
The etching process of the present invention uses a mixture of process gases that provide high etch rate and a high etching selectivity of SLAM to dielectric. The gas mixture comprises a hydrofluorocarbon gas, such as CHF3, CH2F2, etc., an optional hydrogen-containing gas, such as H2, NH3, etc., an optional fluorine-rich fluorocarbon gas, such as CF4, C2F6, etc., an oxygen-containing gas, such as O2, CO, etc., a nitrogen-containing gas, such as N2, NH3, NF3, etc., and an inert gas. The inert gas is activated by the energized process gas to sputter and remove dissociated material loosely adhered to the surface of the substrate, thereby, enhancing the photoresist and SLAM etch rate. The inert gas can comprise argon, xenon, neon, krypton, or helium.
One example of the gas mixture comprises CH3F, H2 (optional), CF4 (optional), O2, N2, and Ar. The CH3F flow rate is between about 5 sccm to about 500 sccm. The H2 flow rate is between about 0 sccm to about 500 sccm. The CF4 flow rate is between about 0 sccm to about 1000 sccm. The O2 flow rate is between about 5 sccm to about 500 sccm. The N2 flow rate is between about 5 sccm to about 500 sccm. The flow rate of Ar is between about 20 sccm and about 2000 sccm. The ratio of CH3F flow rate to O2 flow rate is between about 1 to about 20. The ratio of H2 flow rate to O2 flow rate is between 0 to about 5. The ratio of CF4 flow rate to O2 flow rate is between about 0 to about 5. The ratio of N2 flow rate to O2 flow rate is between about 1 to about 10. The ratio of Ar flow rate to O2 flow rate is between about 1 to about 30. The bias power is between about 0 watts to about 1000 watts and the source power is between about 50 watts to about 5000 watts. The cathode temperature is between about −20° C. to about 80° C. and the process chamber pressure is between about 0.1 mTorr to about 1 Torr.
Plasma containing hydrofluorocarbon and/or fluorocarbon gases have been used to break Si—O bond in the dielectric material. The etching reaction may include,
Since SLAM contains siloxane polymer, it makes sense to include hydrofluorocarbon and/or fluorocarbon gases in the gas mixture to assist in breaking the Si—O bond. The hydrogen-rich fluorocarbon gas can also have another function. Hydrogen-containing gas can provide hydrogen or hydrogen-containing radicals in the etching plasma that, when combined with nitrogen or nitrogen-containing radicals, break the Si—CH3 bond faster, resulting in faster etch rate and higher etch selectivity. The oxygen gas provides oxygen radicals to react with the hydrocarbon components of the organic polymer of the photoresist and SLAM to form gaseous carbon compounds, such as CO, CO2, and hydrogen compounds, such as HF, other carbon-containing or hydrogen-containing gases, that are exhausted from the process chamber. Nitrogen-containing gas in the process gas has been found to help break the Si—CH3 bond
A gas mixture containing only fluorocarbon gases (without CH3F), CF4 and C4F6, O2, N2, and Ar does not yield high selectivity. Increasing the ratio of C4F6 flow rate to CF4+C4F6 flow rates degrades the etch selectivity from 1.6 to 1. The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 0 to 30 sccm C4F6, 5 to 50 sccm CF4, 40 sccm O2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 watts source power.
The addition of the hydrogen-containing CH3F gas helps to enhance the SLAM/CDO etch (or removal) selectivity. Table 1 shows the etch selectivity of SLAM to CDO. For example, as the ratio of CH3F to CH3F and CF4 increases from 0 to 0.9, the etch selectivity of SLAM/CDO increases from about 1.6 to about 2.8. The studies were conducted under 200 sccm Ar, 0 to 40 sccm CH3F, 5 to 50 sccm CF4, 40 sccm O2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 watts source power.
SLAM/CDO etch selectivity as a function of CH3F/(CF4 + CH3F).
CH3F/(CF4 + CH3F)
High SLAM/CDO etch selectivity, such as 13, can be achieved without the CF4 gas. However, without the CF4 gas, the etch uniformity for SLAM is poor (as high as 30%) and the etch rate is low (see Table 2). Etch uniformity is defined by dividing the net value of maximum etch thickness subtracting the minimum etch thickness by 2 times the average thickness. The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 30 to 40 sccm CH3F, 40 sccm O2, 20 sccm N2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 watts source power.
SLAM/CDO etch selectivity as a function of CH3F flow rate.
CH3F flow rate, sccm
The addition of CF4 improves etch uniformity and etch rates for both materials, but it shows little effect on SLAM/CDO etch selectivity. A small amount of CF4, such as 10 sccm, can drastically improve etch uniformity and etch rate for both materials (see Table 3). The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 40 sccm CH3F, 0 to 10 sccm CF4, 40 sccm O2, 20 sccm N2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 watts source power.
SLAM and CDO etch rates as a function of CF4 flow rate.
CF4 flow rate (sccm)
SLAM etch rate (Å/min)
CDO etch rate (Å/min)
The addition of N2 also helps improve the SLAM/CDO etch selectivity. By adding 20 sccm N2 to the gas mixture, the SLAM/CDO etch selectivity doubles. However, further increasing N2 from 20 sccm to 40 sccm does not affect the etch selectivity or etch rates of both materials (SLAM and CDO) (see Table 4). The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 40 sccm CH3F, 10 sccm CF4, 40 sccm O2, 0 to 40 sccm N2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 watts source power.
SLAM/CDO etch selectivity as a function of N2 flow rate.
N2 flow rate, sccm
Bias power level affects SLAM etch rate, CDO etch rate and SLAM etch uniformity. Increasing the bias power from 200 watts to 300 watts increases the etch rates for SLAM and CDO, but the increase shows little effect on the SLAM/CDO etch selectivity (see Table 5). Bias power increase is found to reduce (or improve) the SLAM etch non-uniformity significantly. The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 40 sccm CH3F, 10 sccm CF4, 40 sccm O2, 20 sccm of N2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 200 to 300 watts bias power and 400 watts source power.
SLAM and CDO etch rates as a function of bias power.
Bias power (watts)
SLAM etch rate (Å/min)
CDO etch rate (Å/min)
Source power level does not affect the SLAM etch rate or CDO etch rate; however, it affects SLAM etch uniformity. Increasing the source power from 400 watts to 800 watts shows no effect on etch rates for SLAM and CDO; therefore, the increase has no effect on SLAM/CDO etch selectivity. However, the 400 watt source power increase would severely degrade the SLAM etch uniformity. The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 40 sccm CH3F, 10 sccm CF4, 40 sccm O2, 20 sccm N2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 to 800 watts source power.
Temperature plays a major role in the etch process. Increasing the cathode temperature from −10° C. to 20° C. nearly doubles the SLAM/CDO etch selectivity (from 2.1 to 4.0). If the cathode temperature is increased further to 40° C., the SLAM/CDO etch selectivity could further increase to 6.7. Changing the cathode temperature can be accomplished by varying the He backside pressure. Backside He has cooling effect and lowering the He pressure could increase the cathode temperature. Changing the cathode temperature to be in the range of −10° C. to 40° C. has little effect on the SLAM etch rate. The increase in etch selectivity is mainly cause by the decrease in CDO etch rate at higher cathode temperature (see Table 6). The CDO etch reaction appears to be limited by the adsorption or desorption of reactants and/or products in this temperature range. Since the CDO etch rate decreases from 1250 Å/min to 400 Å/min linearly from −10° C. to 30° C., the reaction does not seem to be limited by reactants or products gas phase transportation. Since the reaction rate change is linear, not exponential, the CDO etch reaction also does not seem to be limited by reaction. The only possible explanation is that the CDO etch in this temperature range is limited by surface adsorption or surface desorption of reactants and/or products. The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 40 sccm CH3F, 10 sccm CF4, 40 sccm O2, 20 sccm N2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 to 800 watts source power.
CDO etch rate and SLAM/CDO etch selectivity as a function of cathode
Cathode T, (° C.)
CDO etch rate (Å/min)
SLAM/CDO etch selectivity
The gas mixture used to etch SLAM can also be used to remove the photoresist (PR), such a DUV resist is Apex-EŽ by Shipley. The photoresist ashing step can be completed in the same chamber used to etch SLAM. The recipe may comprise one single recipe or a two-step recipe with the first step focusing on photoresist ashing. The studies show that the photoresist removal rate is highly affected by the Oxygen (O2) flow rate. Increasing the O2 flow rate from 30 sccm to 40 sccm increases the photoresist removal rate from 1400 Å/min to 2100 Å/min. The selectivity of SLAM to photoresist is between 1.2 and 1.6 (see Table 7), which shows that photoresist removal by this gas mixture is very similar to SLAM. This shows the possibility of combining the photoresist ashing step with the SLAM etch (clean) step. The studies were conducted using 200 sccm Ar, 40 sccm CH3F, 10 sccm CF4, 30 to 40 sccm O2, 20 sccm N2, 30 mTorr chamber pressure, 300 watts bias power and 400 watts source power.
CDO etch rate and SLAM/CDO etch selectivity as a function of cathode
PR etch rate
While foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof may be determined by the claims that follow.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6268457||10 Jun 1999||31 Jul 2001||Allied Signal, Inc.||Spin-on glass anti-reflective coatings for photolithography|
|US6323121 *||12 May 2000||27 Nov 2001||Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company||Fully dry post-via-etch cleaning method for a damascene process|
|US6365529||9 Feb 2000||2 Apr 2002||Intel Corporation||Method for patterning dual damascene interconnects using a sacrificial light absorbing material|
|US6448185||1 Jun 2001||10 Sep 2002||Intel Corporation||Method for making a semiconductor device that has a dual damascene interconnect|
|US6448529||13 Jun 2000||10 Sep 2002||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Electro discharge machining apparatus|
|US6465358 *||6 Oct 2000||15 Oct 2002||Intel Corporation||Post etch clean sequence for making a semiconductor device|
|US6962879||30 Mar 2001||8 Nov 2005||Lam Research Corporation||Method of plasma etching silicon nitride|
|US20010027002 *||15 Feb 2001||4 Oct 2001||Nec Corporation||Method for forming multi-layered interconnect structure|
|US20010046778 *||22 Mar 2000||29 Nov 2001||Fei Wang||Dual damascene process using sacrificial spin-on materials|
|US20020009873 *||23 Jul 2001||24 Jan 2002||Tatsuya Usami||Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same|
|US20020031906 *||6 Sep 2001||14 Mar 2002||Ping Jiang||Defect and etch rate control in trench etch for dual damascene patterning of low-k dielectrics|
|US20020168849||22 Feb 2002||14 Nov 2002||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Method of manufacturing interconnection line in semiconductor device|
|US20020173143||2 Apr 2002||21 Nov 2002||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Method for forming metal wiring layer of semiconductor device|
|US20030194495||11 Apr 2002||16 Oct 2003||Applied Materials, Inc.||Crosslink cyclo-siloxane compound with linear bridging group to form ultra low k dielectric|
|US20030218427||9 Jul 2002||27 Nov 2003||Applied Materials, Inc.||Capacitively coupled plasma reactor with magnetic plasma control|
|US20040132291||23 Jul 2003||8 Jul 2004||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Method of fabricating dual damascene interconnections of microelectronic device using hybrid low k-dielectric and carbon-free inorganic filler|
|1||Kennedy, Joseph, et al., "An Anthracene-Organosiloxane Spin On Antireflective Coating for KrF Lithography", SPIE 28<SUP>th </SUP>Annual Microlithography Conference, Feb. 23, 2003.|
|2||Ultraviolet from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep<SUB>-</SUB>ultraviolet, no date.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7540971||28 Apr 2006||2 Jun 2009||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma etch process using polymerizing etch gases across a wafer surface and additional polymer managing or controlling gases in independently fed gas zones with time and spatial modulation of gas content|
|US7541292||28 Apr 2006||2 Jun 2009||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma etch process with separately fed carbon-lean and carbon-rich polymerizing etch gases in independent inner and outer gas injection zones|
|US7994050 *||15 Jul 2010||9 Aug 2011||Hynix Semiconductor Inc.||Method for forming dual damascene pattern|
|US8187415 *||21 Jul 2006||29 May 2012||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma etch reactor with distribution of etch gases across a wafer surface and a polymer oxidizing gas in an independently fed center gas zone|
|US8231799||28 Apr 2006||31 Jul 2012||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma reactor apparatus with multiple gas injection zones having time-changing separate configurable gas compositions for each zone|
|US20060046465 *||25 Aug 2005||2 Mar 2006||Dongbuanam Semiconductor Inc.||Method for manufacturing a semiconductor device|
|US20070247075 *||21 Jul 2006||25 Oct 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma etch reactor with distribution of etch gases across a wafer surface and a polymer oxidizing gas in an independently fed center gas zone|
|US20070251642 *||28 Apr 2006||1 Nov 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma reactor apparatus with multiple gas injection zones having time-changing separate configurable gas compositions for each zone|
|US20070251917 *||28 Apr 2006||1 Nov 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma etch process using polymerizing etch gases across a wafer surface and additional polymer managing or controlling gases in independently fed gas zones with time and spatial modulation of gas content|
|US20070254483 *||28 Apr 2006||1 Nov 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma etch process using polymerizing etch gases and an inert diluent gas in independent gas injection zones to improve etch profile or etch rate uniformity|
|US20070254486 *||28 Apr 2006||1 Nov 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Plasma etch process with separately fed carbon-lean and carbon-rich polymerizing etch gases in independent inner and outer gas injection zones|
|US20100311239 *||9 Dec 2010||Ki Lyoung Lee||Method for forming dual damascene pattern|
|U.S. Classification||216/66, 257/E21.579, 257/E21.252, 216/72, 438/725, 216/74, 438/736|
|International Classification||C23F1/00, H01L21/768, H01L21/311, C03C15/00, B44C1/22, C03C25/68|
|Cooperative Classification||H01L21/76808, H01L21/31116|
|European Classification||H01L21/768B2D2, H01L21/311B2B|
|2 Oct 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHAE, HEE YEOP;DELGADINO, GERARDO A.;YE, YAN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018344/0575;SIGNING DATES FROM 20031107 TO 20031112
|4 Jul 2011||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|27 Nov 2011||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|17 Jan 2012||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20111127