Your reading comprehension skills are as about as good as nitpicking arguments that you don't have a say in. You need to reread the part where I didn't use "expensive" twice.
why are you being so hostile? it's a shitty analogy and you know it. a better analogy would be "target selvedge denim:toyota carolla::designer denim:lexus". your analogy doesn't make sense to 99% of people and i think you literally googled "three wheel car" and picked the first image that suited you to make a point. don't be a baby and just admit you're wrong
here's what you wrote:
i admit, i have trouble comprehending what you wrote because it doesn't make sense. let me get this straight... qO ol "tells people off for buying expensive things, while advocating the purchase of goods so that [qO ol] fit in with that same exact group.." that's how you wrote the statement as and it infers "telling people off for buying expensive jeans while advocating the purchase of expensive goods"
this isn't what i'm arguing about though. i believe that expensive denim is worth it too. my whole point, and what i'm arguing is, so far nobody has said WHY target selvedge is shitty. basically people are saying "target selvedge is shitty" (making a conclusion) without backing it up with ANY REASON.