You want to make a workforce for the D.U.M.B.S.?
Let's take three countries, Canada, the US and the UK. The child missing stats are 66,000, 650,000 and 150,000 every year without a trace. Add to that
missing adults between the three of another 500,000 per year. Now, where the hell do all these people go? Kids that are 4 to 12 years old generally
don't have the smarts to manufacture fake ID. Teens between 12 and 17, well maybe some are runaways and others are exported for use in the sex/slave
trade. Adults, some may just want to fall off the radar, but not all. Remember, that these people rarely if ever show again, kids, teens or adults.
If you wanted a trainable workforce, you start with trainable minds and I would expect kids between 12 and 18 would work out best. The rest I guess
would be kept fed, housed and would be taught the basics until their necessary injection into the underground workforce.
But let's just say that they are being moved to other countries, what are the logistics of that little venture if say you ship 250 per 737/747. Seems
to me with roughly 1.4 million people missing in just three countries that's about 5600 plane flights or about one every hour and a half, every day of
the year. But, those three countries have less than 1/10 of the world population, so extrapolate the data... potentially 14 million people (9 million
of which are children) go missing world-wide every year. Now how many flights is that? 56.000 or about 153 flights per day or one every 10 minutes.
Does this sound feasible? What about the costs of moving that many people around, it's huge!
So people go missing and generally the number that go missing are proportional to the population of the country in most cases. But what's a bit odd is
that the number that go missing is proportional to the number of D.U.M.B.S.
Now figure that one that out.
But more importantly, children are our future, why is there so little impetus placed on finding them? Something is not right here, the kids especially
should be found.
Cheers - Dave
edit on 9/21.2011 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)