- a person to set or use, or attempt to set or use, a trap to kill or capture wildlife;
- a person to set or use, or attempt to set or use, a body-gripping trap to kill or capture any feral or domestic animal;
- a person to apply or use, or attempt to apply or use, any poison to kill or injure wildlife or a feral......
UPDATED 2/21: Thanks to a commenter, we've realized that our interpretation of the proposed law as it pertains to Wildlife [Dis]Services was perhaps too cynical. [Us? Cynical?] Here's the relevant exception:
The provisions of subsection A of this section shall not prohibit: (1) the taking of wildlife or feral or domestic animals by federal, state, county, or municipal government employees or their duly authorized agents when prohibited devices or methods are the only feasible method available to protect human health and safety.We here at DL just instantly rolled our eyes at that exception, knowing that the more-than-a-few bad apples are likely to invoke it at every opportunity. But perhaps not. Perhaps "feasible" will convince them to try other tactics before the old standbys. What do you think, Gentle Reader?
P.S. That link to Rep. Gonzales' webpage ain't for nothing. Here's a hint: Emily Post
P.P.S. Google "conibear trap image." If that doesn't convince you of the significance of this bill, check for a pulse.