Samba vs. NFS
Alexandre de Abreu
alexandre.abreu at proteus.com.br
Tue Dec 9 21:48:24 UTC 2003
David C. Hart wrote:
> What is the convention wisdom with respect to Linux clients/Linux
> server? NFS, SMB, both?
> Samba SEEMS to provide better throughput yes? NFS presumably uses fewer
> Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
You can fix the ports and then play with iptables rules. NFS uses
tcp/udp 2049 and if you edit the nfs script under /etc/init.d you will
see that if the MOUNTD_PORT variable is set, the daemon is started with
the -p option indicating the port that the rpc.mountd process will bind.
You can verify this with 2 commands:
"netstat -anp|grep LISTEN" or "rpcinfo -p localhost"
This will show the process name and port numbers of the RPC services.
Alexandre Lima de Abreu, RHCE, LPIC-2
Proteus Security Systems
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2832 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20031209/d817154b/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the users