[ros-dev] ntdocs diff
ayerkes at speakeasy.net
Sat Jan 28 22:00:52 CET 2006
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 01:52:03 -0600
Jerry <crashfourit at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please ignore my last diff; this is an improved version.
> This diff sets up a directory (ntdocs) where documention and test cases
> and be put.
> I sugest that the tree for this dir should mirror the actual code base
> for ease of use.
Do we have a common template and a general format for the docs
that will go in ntdocs? Is it different for different types of
documents that go in here?
I can think of a few types:
1) Justifications for original reactos code that was not dirty
room reverse engineered.
2) Documentation of method that have been dirty-roomed before
3) Documentation of tests an analysis that justify architectural
Also, how do we feel about test programs? I've got a few more
that I never committed because people complained about them.
Here's a simple experiment. Stand on a train track between two
locomotives which are pushing on you with equal force in opposite
directions. You will exhibit no net motion. None the less, you may
soon begin to notice that something important is happening.
-- Robert Stirniman
More information about the Ros-dev