Nope, does not mean a thing to me, why? Is he a friend of yours? Is there any meaningful conclusion you are trying to draw (with crayons)?
Your feigned ignorance of Warren Jeffs says much about the courage of your convictions. You’re essentially running away.
To prove God to you would simply result in your claim that you were "tricked". A predisposition such as yours is often seen in feeble arguments.
But if you want to start at the ground floor, resolve your assertion of a subjective morality without recognizing that there is, indeed, an absolute morality.
From your first post in this thread: it seems that since "morality" comes from God, it would be an error to claim that His commands are criminal.
If you can’t back up your assertions you shouldn’t make them in the first place. Man up, boy.
apparently not yours....look in the "V" section under 'variant', and then actually use the "E" section to look up enquire.....see the magic? variant.
So now that you’ve looked it up you know the one is a variant of the other. You may have a cookie.
worse attempt ever. your potency of corruption is about as strong as Richard Dawkins' will to refuse a book signing.
You’re not a native English speaker, are you?
amateur mistake. Morality and law are hardly the same thing. You contradict your earlier assertion with "subject to the collective morality". Still got the floaties on do you?
The one derives from the other, similar to how Warren Jeffs' priesthood authority derives from that of Joseph Smith. Both are sexual batterers. Both have a history of deception for the purpose of personal gain and enrichment. Both are criminals.
Tell me, which of these cretins do you claim to be a prophet? Joseph or Warren? Or both?
Or will you run away from this question too?
But you condemned "alleged acts".
alleged sexual battery is completely different than sexual battery. Much like one could allege that you are intelligent, but in reality you could be less than that. Key word "allege" - your flaw is by trying to associate "alleged action" with "action" - to most people these are completely different - with only the latter deserving condemnation or praise.
My question from my previous post: Would you agree that sexual battery, alleged or otherwise, is a bad thing?
You refusal to answer says a great deal about the courage of your convictions. Again, you’re running away.
absurd statements, absurd conclusions, and absurd question.
Ah, so this is what you’re saying now instead of “ugh” when you really mean “I concede your point.”
Whatever blows your skirt, dude.
actually ugh is also in that dictionary you havehttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ugh
i subscribe to the "disgust" option, though your leaps in reason are "horrific".
Yet, apart from this instance here you’ve suddenly stopped saying “ugh”. How telling.
Which "prophet" are you defending? Warren Jeffs or Joseph Smith?