How does that make it better? To me it just makes you look chicken****.I said IF he got his source from a truther site, then he wasn't being fair.
That's quite a claim.He likes to discredit anything and everything that wasn't seen firsthand because everyone has an agenda except for him.
Here is what he posted:Want more proof? He uses sites like 911review.com for evidence.
911 review is ok. Anything other than first hand eyewitness is not.
I've posted this before, but of course the braying idiots keep asking how the WTC could be rigged for demolition.
So, here it is again, a 4 part series by Kevin Ryan - (he makes JREF heads explode) explaining it.
Read it or STFU. I'm tired of having to repeat myself.
How exactly does that support your claim that "He likes to discredit anything and everything that wasn't seen firsthand because everyone has an agenda except for him."? Or was that to provide evidence that he weighs evidence with bias? If so how does what you posted support the claim?