[Standards] Namespaces, specifications, and protocol life cycles
dmeyer at tzi.de
Wed Sep 10 04:38:27 CDT 2008
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> it would be nice to have a list of implementations
>> that support a specific XEP. A second step would maybe some inter-op
>> testing. There are two at the summit, but I guess that is not enough.
> For "major" XMPP technologies we've started documenting that:
> Much more work is required, however.
Very much work (Pubsub rocks is true but not very helpful). Since the
is a Wiki page for all XEPs, maybe we could use it. Each client or
server can add itself as "I support this starting from version foo".
I see it is done with BOSH:
Hard work never killed anyone, but why give it a chance?
More information about the Standards