.
Reassigning to Robin - he may have something more clever to say :-)
Nick,
On the RHN site, go to the 'Users' tab, select a user, and click the
'System Groups' tab of the user details page. The 'Default System
Groups' feature is the one you are looking for, I believe.
Activation keys is another way to solve this problem - you can specify
system groups for an activation key, and a system registered with that
key will be placed in those groups. The user must also have
permission to the groups for him to see the systems.
Let me know if the above solution meets your needs.
The ideal situation would be a user would register a system into a
default group e.g. 'Newly Registered Systems'. This can be done using
the default system groups or activation keys.
The user would then move the system to the final destination group -
this is the bit that we cannot do at present.
Nick,
This is not a bug; it's a design decision. Therefore I'm closing it,
but with this final workaround:
* Create a group for each user. Let's say you've got three users:
Adam, Bob, and Charlie. One group for each: "Adam's new systems,
Bob's new systems, Charlie's new systems."
* Create activation keys for each. When Adam uses "Adam's key," it'll
put the new system into "Adam's new systems".
* Adam, Bob, and Charlie will have the ability to reassign any systems
that come into these groups into any other groups to which they have
admin access. Therefore, Charlie should be able to move a new system
from "Charlie's new systems" into "Charlie's web servers".
NOTE: there will be a feature forthcoming that allows users to use
multiple activation keys together; this feature will allow you to have
an "Adam/Bob/Charlie" key that can be combined with other keys that
govern other attributes. This should be customer-facing within the
next 6-8 weeks.
Hope this helps.Thanks for the tip but my main cellphone is strictly for business so I use a second cellphone with no cellphone service as my podcast phone while I'm on the road.
Tommy, Will the FE and the VIP's ship at the same time or will the VIP's ship later?
Hey Juice, put some ice cubes in that juice and cool it. I am sure there are a multitude of issues the IE team is dealing with as they approach the go - no go production deadline for 10-10-2020 release date. Putting out new video's should be at the bottom of theire list. In case you haven't noticed, there has also been a few issues concerning viruses and demonstrations dominating the news cycles. Not the best time to do a press release. Also, you may have not noticed but no one has been playing baseball lately either. FYI, I am not walking on eggshells and I don't see anyone else here doing that either. I've got 4 Amico's on order and I haven't for one second thought about requesting a refund. I like everyone else am hoping IE makes the 10-10-2020 release date, but if it slips they still have my complete support and understanding. In Tommy I trust!
Unless I have missed something, I haven't heard anything about Space Invaders or Space Armada. Any plans on releasing one of these?
... and this sums up the reason I quit gaming in the mid 90's. Those predicting an Amico fail don't have a clue. I am so ready for 10-10-2020 and so is the world, they just don't know it yet.
Sport games was the driving force in buying the original Intellivision. Night Stalker Biplanes Baseball Bowling Safe Cracker Auto Racing Breakout Not on list - Tron Deadly Disk!
Tommy, how many pre-orders are you up to?
But what kid would ask for a Switch but no games? I think a typical kid is going to ask for a Switch and at least a couple of games, otherwise what is he going to do with it. Cost quickly jumps to $400.
Tommy, this is not fair.  I want mine, now!
Why would you spend one dime on marketing when... 1. Due to world issues the date may slip. 2. Over 10,000 units have already been pre-sold with $0 spent 3. The remaining 2020 production run could easily be sold via one appearance on a show like Ellen. I'd really be concerned if IE was spending valuable marketing dollars 4 months before a potential launch date. That would represent very questionable use of monies at this time. Who cares about the hardware - are the games fun? Why run a press release when the news is 24/7 Covid and public unrest. That not only negates there effectiveness but may look bad for the company doing the release. You answered many of your own questions when you said, "I know things are naturally delayed by COVID-19, riots, murder hornets, you name it and nothing can be done about that." But something can be done about it - you make changes to your business and marketing strategies which Tommy and IE have obviously done. Most of your issues are only relevant to a very, very, very small fraction of the Amico market and will have absolutely no effect on the target market going forward.
Here's my list of for sure buys... Auto Racing Baseball Bowling Boxing Football Hockey Back Talk Party Picture Charades Frogger Miner 2049er Safecracker Tron Deadly Discs!!!!!! And I assume I will buy a lot more too. I moved on to the ColecoVision and Atari 400 and missed out on a lot of the later Intellivision titles after about 1982 so I am unfamiliar with a lot of the later games.It looks as if the scourge of lobbyists will continue in Canberra if Bill Shorten wins the next election. As with the Coalition, there is no sign Labor is prepared to curb the way lobbyists are corrupting public policy in Australia. The media reports lobby firms are taking on “labor staffers” so that they can influence a future Labor government. John Menadue reports.
The Australian Financial Review of June 4, 2018, said:
 his lobbying firm had sought to broaden its personnel for more than a year, including employing former Rudd government media adviser, Kathryn Conroy. Photios said “a year out from an election was often the last chance for key staff to change roles”.
I am reposting below an edited version of “The scourge of lobbyists” posted on Pearls and Irritations on 12 May 2018.
MICHAEL THORN. Corporate power unchecked: Time to redress a dangerous imbalance on public discussion on climate change.
Martin Parkinson, the Secretary of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, has warned about “vested interests” who seek concessions from government at the expense of ordinary citizens. Some time ago the former ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel, cautioned us that
“A new conga line of rent seekers is lining up to take the place of those that have fallen out of favour”.
In referring to opposition to company tax and carbon pollution reform policies, Ross Gittins in the SMH said:
“industry lobby groups [have] become less inhibited in pressing private interests at the expense of the wider public interest. [They] are ferociously resistant to reform proposals.”
Revolving Doors: how the fossil fuel lobby has governments ensnared
These problems are widespread and growing.
There are 252 lobbying entities registered in Canberra with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. These entities employ a significant number of lobbyists, e.g. Barton Deakin employs 9 lobbyists, Newgate Communications 19, Crosby Textor 7 and GRACosway 19., the Australian Pharmacy Guild and the notorious Business Council of Australia. These lobbyists encompass a range of interests including mining, clubs, hospitals, private health insurance funds, business and hotels that have all successfully challenged government policy and the public interest in many ways. Just think what the Minerals Council of Australia did to subvert public discussion on the Mining Super Profits Tax and the activities of Clubs Australia to thwart gambling reform, or the polluters over an Emissions Trading Scheme and the Carbon Tax. Only recently we saw the socially damaging role of the Beverage Council of Australia in undermining expert opinion on ways to address the growing epidemic of obesity. It is a repeat of Big Tobacco..
The health “debate” lobbying interests in health win time and time again. As I have often said, health ministers may be in office but the health providers and their lobbyists are in power. They effectively have the Department of Health and Aging in their pocket.
The wealthy private schools with their lobbying and political clout are obstacles to needs-based funding, which is necessary for both equity and efficiency reasons.
Much of the policy skills in Canberra departments have been downgraded and “policy” work is contracted out to accounting and consultancy firms with poor policy skills and no corporate memory. This handing out of work is done in the name of downsizing government but it gives a major advantage to those the accounting and business associates are close to, the large and powerful corporations who are hostile to government.
Policy work within the government is now undertaken more in specialist organisations such as the Productivity Commission rather than in the departments. Departmental policy capability has been seriously eroded. That makes it harder for the public service to safeguard the public interest against lobbyists with their incessant demands for favourable treatment.
Inexperienced and young ministerial staff