, the spill came from an underground fuel line that had likely been leaking undetected for decades. Estimates of the amount of fuel leaked range from 6 million to 24 million gallons, and contamination has been detected in groundwater beneath a southeast Albuquerque neighborhood a mile from the site of the initial leak.
No contamination has been detected in municipal drinking water. State and independent experts have estimated that it could take anywhere from five to 40 years to reach the nearest supply wells.
Poor-quality work by the Air Force and its contractor, CB&I, “has jeopardized the achievement of the interim measures by the specified deadlines,” state Environmental Health Division Director Tom Blaine wrote.
According to the NMED’s letter, the Air Force had proposed “anaerobic biodegredation” as a first cleanup step – essentially using bacteria to eat the petroleum in the groundwater. To do that, the Air Force suggested a series of laboratory experiments that would have taken five months to complete, according to the Environment Department. Additional tests required before implementing the cleanup approach would mean a pilot test just to see if the method works “would likely take more than one year to complete,” the NMED letter said.
Instead, the NMED directed the Air Force to immediately install a “proven technology” in which air is pumped into the contaminated aquifer, removing contamination as it bubbles upward. Once the fuel is vaporized and rises into the soil layers above, the contamination can be sucked away using vacuum systems, Blaine said in an interview.
An Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority official praised the letter, saying it suggests state regulators are serious about holding the Air Force to the June 30 deadline. “I think this is a positive step,” said Rick Shean, water quality hydrologist for the agency.
Once again, Zorin OS uses Gnome. I know you've been told this several times on several postings you have made. Correct, there are things in your story that don't make any sense. 

The only way it would change to Gnome default look is if someone deleted the Zorin files. You do understand almost everyone in here uses Zorin, Yes? No?  I've been using Linux for almost 20 years, I also know things just don't magically change without someone touching something. So clearly someone is capable of doing something. 

Set them up with a user, that is not an admin just a standard user. 

I have no idea what you're talking about in the end about windows as you're not being clear. You stated above you installed Firefox, but it automatically comes with it,. Which begs the question, what exactly are you installing over there. And if it wasn't already there, then you had a bad install. Which brings us back to maybe the problems you are having is because the install was bad. You said no. Then that only leaves user error. 

I have no issue with my windows, I have no issues at all. The only issues I have had were self created and I fixed them. 

I have no idea what you've changed, done or even if it was a bad install. I highly suggest redownloading the OS and reinstalling.Edmonton Oilers situation with Milan Lucic is "almost untenable" and he must be moved "whatever it takes," says NHL insider. Huh?!
This is just the first part of Seravalli’s extended take on the Lucic situation. I’ll go through Seravalli’s points here one by one, as he makes a number of them.
To start, I have to give some credit to Seravalli for stirring up things. I don’t agree with many of his points here but he gets marks for sparking controversy, which is all part of the fun (and reality) of NHL hockey talk.
On this initial point, Seravalli comparing the Lucic situation to the Karlsson situation makes little or no sense. They are not at all in the same category. The Karlsson situation is indeed untenable. It’s a fiasco. It’s shaping up as something of a disaster for the Ottawa franchise. The Lucic situation is far from that for him and for the Oilers.
I accept there might well be a bit of spin here from Johansson, but the only really important thing in the agent’s message is his emphatic insistence that Lucic is coming back to Edmonton.
So while Karlsson has made it evident he’s unhappy and wants out of Ottawa (I have no idea if Skinner and Faulk want out of Carolina), the opposite message is coming from the Lucic camp.
It would have been fine indeed for the Oilers to make more and better moves in recent weeks, but I haven’t seen any suggestions in the realm of the palatable about how Chiarelli could have greatly improved the squad. Seravalli and others may wish that Chiarelli had moved Lucic and traded for a top winger and a top d-man, but was any of that remotely possible? Only if the Oilers gave up Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, or Oscar Klefbom, and/or the ninth overall pick in the draft that was used to take Evan Bouchard. Would it have been wise to do make such moves? Or was it smarter to see if injured players like Andrej Sekera, Klefbom and Cam Talbot can bounce back, and if forwards like Jesse Puljujarvi, Ryan Strome, Jujhar Khaira, Drake Caggiula, Kailer Yamamoto and Ty Rattie might improve? Was it also not a good plan to see if coach Todd McLellan might be able to devise a better game plan with his new group of assistant coaches?
As for his work at the trade deadline, Chiarelli did add useful forwards in Tobias Rieder and Kyle Brodziak and he did so on relatively cheap contracts. It’s not like he sat on his hands and accomplished not one thing. He’s given McLellan a few more tools to work with.
Hmm. Seravalli’s line of thinking again breaks down here. Is not one of the biggest criticisms of Chiarelli that he made a mistake in moving out Taylor Hall and Jordan Eberle and got too little in return? If these moves were indeed mistakes, why would Chiarelli want to now make a similar mistake and pay too high a price to move out Lucic?
And what is the urgency in such a move? Again, Johansson has made it crystal clear that Lucic is willing to come back to Edmonton and prove himself to be a good player again.
If other NHL teams are only willing to take on Lucic if the Oilers give up a high draft pick or an excellent prospect or a good player, why not instead just see how Lucic does when he gets back to Edmonton this season?
He could end up playing well and the entire matter will blow over. Or he could end up playing well and improving his trade value. At worst, he’ll likely play at the same level, which would make him an OK two-way third line winger and superior enforcer, so a player with some value to the Oilers even if he isn’t earning his $6 million pay cheque.
In the end, I don’t quite get where Seravalli is coming from. He seems to be trying to ramp up the pressure to trade Lucic (by comparing his situation to the Karlsson fiasco) and saying the Oilers should be willing to pay a high price to solve this so-called “almost untenable” situation. But this situation isn’t untenable. It’s tenable.
And moving Lucic at a loss doesn’t sound like sharp management of player assets. All due respect to Seravalli, it sounds like bad advice. Or am I missing something here?
STAPLES: Jesse Puljujarvi is NOT Nail Yakupov. Be patient.package wu.ui;

import com.jfoenix.assets.JFoenixResources;
import com.jfoenix.svg.SVGGlyphLoader;
import wu.ui.weights.DeviceListItemView;
import wu.ui.weights.beans.DeviceItemViewBean;
import javafx.application.Application;
import javafx.collections.FXCollections;
import javafx.collections.ObservableList;
import javafx.scene.Node;
import javafx.scene.Scene;
import javafx.scene.control.ListCell;
import javafx.scene.control.ListView;
import javafx.stage.Stage;
import javafx.util.Callback;

import java.io.IOException;

public class MyListViewDemo2 extends Application {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        launch(args);
    }

    @Override
    public void start(Stage primaryStage) throws Exception {
        Thread thread = new Thread(() -> {
            try {
                SVGGlyphLoader.loadGlyphsFont(MyListViewDemo2.class.getResourceAsStream("/fonts/icomoon.svg"),
                    "icomoon.svg");
            } catch (IOException ioExc) {
                ioExc.printStackTrace();
            }
        });
        thread.start();
        thread.join();

        ObservableList<Node> objects = FXCollections.observableArrayList();
        long s = System.currentTimeMillis();
        objects.add(new DeviceListItemView(DeviceItemViewBean.createConnectLoginBean("",