A US Army veteran comes home to his family in Central Missouri, Things changed and his relationships are not as they used to be, a sexual adult game in which you can do anything with family members.
import org.sql2o.*;
import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.util.*;

public class ClientTest {

  @Before
  public void setUp() {
    DB.sql2o = new Sql2o("jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/hair_salon_test", null, null);
  }

  @After
  public void tearDown() {
    try(Connection con = DB.sql2o.open()) {
      String deleteRestaurantQuery = "DELETE FROM clients *;";
      String deleteCategoriesQuery = "DELETE FROM stylists *;";
      con.createQuery(deleteRestaurantQuery).executeUpdate();
      con.createQuery(deleteCategoriesQuery).executeUpdate();
    }
  }

  @Test public void client_exists_true(){
    Client testCli = new Client("<NAME>", 0);
    assertEquals(true, testCli instanceof Client);
  }

  @Test public void getName_InstantiatesWithName_String() {
    Client testCli = new Client("Hamurai", 0);
    assertEquals("Hamurai", testCli.cliName());
  }

  @Test public void all_emptyAtFirst() {
    assertEquals(Client.all().size(), 0);
  }

  @Test public void equals_returnsTrueIfDescriptionsAretheSame() {
    Client firstCli = new Client("Ms.Sullivan", 0);
    Client secondCli = new Client("Ms.Sullivan", 0);
    assertTrue(firstCli.equals(secondCli));
  }

  @Test public void save_returnsTrueIfDescriptionsAretheSame() {
    Client testCli = new Client("<NAME>", 0);
    testCli.save();
    assertTrue(Client.all().get(0).equals(testCli));
  }

  @Test public void save_assignsIdToObject() {
    Client testCli = new Client("<NAME>", 0);
    testCli.save();
    Client savedCli = Client.all().get(0);
    assertEquals(testCli.cliId(), savedCli.cliId());
  }

  @Test public void find_findsCliInDatabase_true() {
    Client testCli = new Client("<NAME>", 0);
    testCli.save();
    Client savedCli = Client.find(testCli.cliId());
    assertTrue(testCli.equals(savedCli));
  }

  @Test public void save_savesIdIntoDB_true() {
    Stylist testSty = new Stylist("<NAME>");
    testSty.save();
    Client testCli = new Client("Stealy",testSty.getId());
    testCli.save();
    Client savedCli = Client.find(testCli.cliId());
    assertEquals(savedCli.styId(), testSty.getId());
  }


}
Who am I living for? God or Man? I have been contemplating this question.
We post things on social networking that get ‘likes’. If we don’t get the ‘thumbs up’, then we feel like what we posted was not good enough….and maybe we even feel a little rejected.
Or is that just me?
How many times have I battled within myself over something I said online?
“Should I remove it?”
“Why hasn’t anyone liked it?”
“I think it’s witty. It’s witty, isn’t it? How come no one else thinks it is?”
“I’m going to remove it. I don’t want anyone to get the wrong idea. Oh wait, I got a like! Maybe I’ll keep it.”
On the other end of the conversation, my patient husband just shakes his head.
Truthfully, this is why my blog has been silent. I wonder who I write for. Well, I wonder lots of things. One, I know my blog isn’t big. Is it encouraging the few faithful followers who do read it? Or is it all for gain? Do I have something to help someone, or is it something we’ve all heard before. Two, who am I writing for? Do I need to pour my heart out to millions of people? Do I need to make my voice heard in cyberspace? If writing is therapeutic for me, which it is, then why can’t I just write privately? Why do I need to share the words on social media, whether on Facebook or on a blog site?
I’m not sure where I’m going with this. But it is where my heart is lately. In all things, I want to make sure that the goal is God’s approval, not people’s. I think sometimes the line can get blurry, and we need to reevaluate why we do what we do, and if we need to change something. This is where I’m at.Travis Vader's defence lawyer has rested his case, concluding the evidence portion of his first-degree murder trial.
Final arguments have been scheduled for June 22 to 24 in the trial, and Justice Denny Thomas has said he expects he can render a decision by the end of August.
Friday morning, Thomas delivered a decision on a defence application to omit text messages police obtained from Telus as evidence because the way they were obtained amounts to a breach of Vader's rights.
“The texts are now entered into evidence on an unconditional basis,” he said.
Vader is accused of murdering St. Albert couple Lyle and Marie McCann on July 3, 2010. They were last seen filling their motorhome with fuel that morning. The motorhome was found burning near Minnow Lake Campground on July 5, and their SUV was found abandoned two weeks later.
Text messages entered into evidence show, among other things, two text messages sent July 3 from the McCanns' cellphone to Vader's ex-girlfriend Amber Williams signed “T.” She has testified she believes Vader sent those messages based on their romantic-themed contents.
Defence evidence presented Wednesday, May 25, included three witnesses calling into question a different element of the Crown's case.
First, Terence Ostertag testified he knew Vader's associate Terry McColman for 30 years prior to his May 2011 death, and bolstered the defence claim that Vader may not have sent text messages attributed to him.
Crown prosecutors have argued text messages sent from the McCanns' cellphone to Vader's ex girlfriend Amber Williams just hours after the couple was last seen, which were signed “T” and which Williams testified she believed came from Vader because of their romantic nature, are evidence linking Vader to the McCanns.
Defence lawyer Brian Beresh has suggested Vader has never referred to himself as “T,” those messages were actually sent by McColman.
Ostertag testified when he and McColman were roommates, McColman would often sign notes or text messages as “T.” He also testified he believed McColman was “sweet on” Williams, but could not provide specific examples of McColman telling him this.
He also testified that he had known McColman to steal vehicles, and one night he returned home tired and wet saying he had fled from police after stealing a truck.
“He had just barely escaped by getting down to the North Saskatchewan River, and getting across it,” he said.
Under cross-examination, Ostertag also testified he had used meth and that Vader was part of the drug scene in the Edson area. He said believed Vader had “probably” been using drugs in 2010, but said he had not necessarily seen him doing drugs himself.
“My specific recollection of that isn't clear,” he said. “There was casual drug use occasionally; I can't say specifically if it was Travis.
The second witness, Clarence Foisy, testified he had been at the Minnow Lake Campground July 4, 2010, for an anniversary party, and saw a motorhome towing an SUV, both of which match the descriptions of those belonging to the McCanns.
While he did not identify pictures of either Lyle or Marie McCann, he said he had seen a man of about 65 years old walking near the motorhome at one point.
His daughter and daughter-in-law had previously provided similar testimony, but there was some inconsistency between their versions of events – specifically who may have been with the motorhome and when the SUV in tow was detached from the motorhome.
Foisy said he noticed the motorhome had not been parked particularly well, and had not been leveled off, as one would expect to see if people were sleeping in it for the night.
“It was parked at a really crazy angle,” he said.
The third witness was Tanja Radovanovic, a woman who claims she saw Crown witness Myles Ingersoll smoking methamphetamine at a house in Edmonton the early morning hours of April 4, the day he testified at the trial.
During his testimony he spoke of using drugs with Vader and of seeing Vader in the McCanns' SUV. In cross-examination Beresh had questioned his reliability, even suggesting he was high while giving his testimony.
Radovanovic testified she had been at the house