 also like the skirmishing option, but they should have that be an option, not a standard.
Expert at warhammer, doh ho.
I'd rather f**k a cactus.
Give them shields and the option to fight with their great swords one handed with +1 strength or two handed at +2 strength. Ignore penalties for fighting with great weapons, that is they fight in initiative order and bump their initiative up to 4.
Yes they're uber swordsmen, but then they should be uber swordsmen.
0-1 unit as core if you take Karl Franz or an Elector Count (General of the Empire).
I suppose some sort of bodyguard rule where they're immune to fear, terror and panic so long as they're escorting the army General would be nice too, although I think stubborn is supposed to represent that.
Nah, a la carte thats 16 variations of an elite infantry without taking into account equipment options. Part of the art of war is confusing and befuddling your opponent so options for the "simple" army's generals to try to double guess about you are a good thing.
For example if your enemy has decided in his head that your unit of vanilla gs's is fully equipped and supported and changes his tactics to go after instead your helblaster because that seems to be a more survivable frontal attack, you have succeeded as a general.
The best things in life for a table top general are the, drop removals, forehead slaps and self recriminations of his opponents. Oh yeah, and the favour of the dice gods.
To the Last man!: Greatswords are reknown for their Resilience when confronted with terrors and abhorations that would send other men running.
Greatswords never automatically break from combat by being outnumbered by a fear or terror causing enemy. They also do not have to take terror checks. However, they are still not immune to fear or terror and must take either test when charged or charging enemies of this type, suffering all ussual consequences when failing these tests (not being able to charge or hitting on 6's).
Mabye its a bit too good, but it definately makes them more viable.
simplify it to be that they never autobreak for any reason. This way they have to be broken by an actual die roll against their stubborness. not easy to do.
So super easy. Make them immune to psychology.
Immune to psychology and stubborn. I think that would make them worth their points. It's almost justifiable from their fluff too. They take vows to stand their ground no matter what stands against them.
ya know on second thought the complete immunity to psyche sits more right with the forlorn hope type of troop than the formed unit of professionals who might look forward to spending their paycheck later on. I'd be inclined for that reason to tie the immunity to fear etc. to the forlorn hope rule than just any old GS's.
This can also cause your enemy to second guess his tactics, facing you with uncertainty. Which is ultimately a good thing.
I'd suggest that upgrading only one greatsword unit to 'Carrorburg Greatswords' (for e.g.) giving them +1S and counts as a rare choice instead, would be a fair rule too..
On the battlefield the courage is constantly tested. Man has to overcome the fear of death (not as easy task as it sounds ) and in order to push yourself fighting on even against impossible odds, you need to rely on your comrade. And that's what greatswords are all about: Companionship overcoming the terror of loss..<issue_start><issue_comment>Title: (m/fmap inc [1 2 3]) => IllegalArgumentException
username_0: Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding something basic, I've only just begun reading the Cats Documentation.

Under the 5.1 [Functor section](https://funcool.github.io/cats/latest/#_functor), there is an example of applying `fmap` to a vector that is raising an exception for me:
```
user=> (m/fmap inc (maybe/just 1))
#<Just@4b00df11: 2>
user=> (m/fmap inc [1 2 3])
IllegalArgumentException You are using return/pure/mzero function without context.  cats.core/get-current-context (core.clj:63)
```

Any help appreciated.

Thanks,
Sean
<issue_comment>username_1: He @username_0 

That is happens because you haven't imported the builtin namespace, that implements the monad and related protocols for clojure vector and other secuence types.

Let see:
```clojure
user=> (require '[cats.core :as m])
nil
user=> (m/fmap inc [1 2 3])
IllegalArgumentException You are using return/pure/mzero function without context.  cats.core/get-current-context (core.clj:63)

user=> (require 'cats.builtin)
nil
user=> (m/fmap inc [1 2 3])
[2 3 4]
```
<issue_comment>username_1: We do not want add monad implementation to clojure types until the user really wants that behavior.
<issue_comment>username_0: @username_1 thanks for the explanation. Make perfect sense. I should have read the docs a bit further. :blush: Appreciate your help!<issue_closed>I’m pretty late so I doubt many people will see this, but there was this movie I got from Redbox one time and I can’t remember the name for the life of me.

It was this movie about this ex-Civil War solider in the 1870’s trying to avenge the death of his family, and man was it *bad.*

I’m talking emotionless acting, I’m talking lighting so unprofessional I’m pretty sure they used flashlights for some scenes, I’m talking seeing doors that lead off of the set in the background, I’m talking our 1870’s protagonist wearing a pink wrist watch in some scenes.

There was also a scene in the beginning of the movie where it jumped from like 1865 to 1872 or something and instead of just showing **1872** on the screen it had to show 1865, 1866, 1867, etc floating across the screen with like each year getting a solid 10-15 seconds of screen timeYou mean what's wrong when a million-dollar business based on let's plays doesn't bother to get separate psn accounts for their actors?





Goodness where does the time fly to?
1.
Hurrah, Hurrah, Hurrah!!! Today starts the Winter Olympics. This evening I will be casting on a sweater at 9p on the dot and celebrating with these people…
Who are these people you ask? You did ask didn’t you? These are my knitting peeps and we are Tri-County Knitaholics. I can hardly wait.
2.
HHBL has been traveling for most of the week. There was a time, a few years ago, when he traveled a fair amount. And I was used to him being gone every other week for most of the week. But I have gotten used to him being home most of the time. So when he travels it throws me off. And not having any kids at home…..it is really sort of creepy here at night. Thank goodness for Max the guard dog.
HHBL will be home later tonight. Hurrah!!!
3.
I didn’t put this picture in with my tribute, yesterday, to my Grandma Amsler. It is one of my favorites so I thought I would put it here. Try not to be dazzled by my incredibly short hair. That is the way that I had it for 15 years. I loved it….then.
4.
I was in serious need of some cat cuddling this week. So I had to resort to borrowing one of LookLeap’s cats. She has two cats, brothers in fact. I remember seeing them when they were wee little kittens at the shelter. They were so cute. They are still cute but….rather wary of people. The only reason that Panda allowed this was because one of the girls picked him up and handed him to me.
Oh yes, that cat looks SOOOOOO happy doesn’t he. Now what you need to know is if I go over to the house and it is just me, and I am feeding them then I am their BFF. “Oh we love you! Oh we love that you feed us! We need more food because our owners never feed us enough!” But then when I am visiting and LookLeap is there it is all turn their backs and walk away.
I feel used.
But I still got a really good cat cuddle in.
5.
I am still in the “Peru recovery” mode therefore my house is not picked up, the laundry isn’t quite done and I have not been productive. I haven’t even gotten all the way through all the pictures I took! But I did want to show you one picture, taken in the supermarket.
Yes I took pictures in the supermarket. Why are you surprised?
I just wanted to laugh, well actually I did laugh. I love names of