 Raiderettes in the District 9-A championship game at Huntland on Thursday. "We hung in there when the going got tough, we made a couple of mental mistakes, made just two errors and we hung in there and got the job done," said Forrest head coach Becky Cheatham.
The Cornersville Bulldogs baseball team experienced a watershed moment on Thursday night when they claimed the program's first ever District tournament championship by pulling out a wild 14-13 extra inning victory over Columbia Academy in the title game at Richland High School. Needing two wins over Cornersville (17-13) to claim the championship after fighting their way through the loser's bracket, CA held a commanding 12-5 lead through the first five and a half innings of play and appeared they would force a deciding game.
After winning their first ever District tournament title four days earlier, the Cornersville Bulldogs (18-13) made history once again on Monday night when they rallied to defeat the Collinwood Trojans 8-5 at home in the first round of the Region 6-A tourney. Having never won a Region tournament game, Cornersville appeared to be in dire straits early on and trailed 5-1 through the first one and a half innings of play.
Two years ago in the Region 5-A semifinal, Houston County handed Forrest a tough 1-0 season-ending loss at the Field of Dreams in Chapel Hill, causing the Lady Rockets to look at a ball from that game, hanging in or around the dugout all last season, before burying the yellow sphere somewhere under the turf in Chapel Hill after a huge 10-2 win over District 10-A's Jo Byrns in last year's region opener. On Monday, the Lady Rockets got their full revenge, outscoring the Lady Irish from Erin 9-7 to advance to the Region 5-A championship on Wednesday night at 5:30 p.m. when they host D9-A foe Moore County, who won a 3-1 thriller at East Robertson.
The Forrest Rockets turned in an all-around solid effort Monday night at White House-Heritage, shutting out the Patriots 4-0 in the Region 5-A opener. Logan Hollingsworth was superb on the mound in the complete game shutout, scattering six hits, while striking out two and walking two Pats hitters. "What Logan did is the definition of pitching," said Forrest head coach Chris Parker. "He threw just 63 pitches in the complete game."It's commendable that the founder turned her dissertation into a business. 

The last time a post had come around about this brand I had checked the website &amp; it featured pictures with mostly very light skinned models wearing her lipsticks. It kind of defeated the whole mission statement the founder has to keep black girls in the forefront of her shade selection.
Even now there are no swatches of the lipsticks on a model of a darker skin tone.
I would say she needs to improve on her website content.


As for the colors themselves they do look really good on her in the buzzfeed article. 
However I would not shell out $25+ on this brand as there are cheaper options for colored lipsticks in the US now like NYX, Colourpop, LASplash etc. If the price comes down a bit I would give it a try!hey, I’ve read the docs for GitHub pages setup with custom domain. It currently supports ANAME, A Record, or CNAME. However, I don’t find an option for URI based support.
Let’s say, I have example.com domain which points to example-dot-com repository. If we want to use the same example.com domain to point to other example-dot-com -one repository, then we have to setup CNAME(sub domain with domain register). From maintenance perspective, it’s difficult to maintain all those sub-domains. New sub-domain needs to be setup whenever new repository is created to display web pages. Also, It takes couple of hours to reflect the changes for sub-domain not effective immediately. Wildcard sub-domain is not secured since other users can able to run web pages with custom domain owned by user.
I don’t know if this is the right fourm to discuss. Shall we consider implementing this change in GitHub?
If what you want is what you’re showing in the table, nothing needs to be implemented. GitHub Pages already does what you’re asking for without the CNAME files in the example-* directories. If you take a look at my repository https://github.com/lee-dohm/house-upgrades, which I use to track aspirational projects I want to take on for my house, I’ve turned on GitHub Pages publishing for it and now it is available at http://www.lee-dohm.com/house-upgrades/ … no CNAME file necessary (in the lee-dohm/house-upgrades repository).Today, there’s a VERY frustrated American public that’s disillusioned with the president, angry at an ineffective Congress, turned off by a seemingly intolerant Republican Party that’s unwilling to govern, and fed up with a Democratic Party that’s had difficulty governing. There’s a crisis in confidence and competence that’s hurting everyone, and that requires some serious soul-searching by Washington’s politicians and both major parties. Yes, perhaps President Obama’s low approval ratings enable the GOP to win back the Senate. And yes, perhaps the public’s dissatisfaction with the GOP—as well as the country’s changing demographics—make Democrats the front-runners to hold the White House in 2016. But something larger is going on here, which could upend everything and produce unintended consequences. If there were serious independent candidates running for the House and Senate in 2014, they would get serious looks; interestingly, though, very few legitimate indie candidates have popped up yet. But don’t be surprised if by the spring of 2014, there are a slew of semi-serious indie candidates in enough places to wreak some havoc.
They could produce unintended consequences!
My Christmas wish to you is that you live long enough to read 10,000 predictions that independent candidates will sweep American elections. It’s a ridiculous premise, not only because American voters (except in Maine) are so reluctant to throw votes away on third candidates in winner-take-all elections. The challenges to an independent candidate—signature requirements to get on the ballot, media coverage, inclusion in debates, getting national fundraising groups like the NRA and Emily’s List to notice you—are so daunting that it’s almost always easier to get elected by running in a major party’s primary. In all but a few states (where parties control nominations through conventions), a “legitimate indie” candidate can crash a Democratic or Republican primary and win as an outsider or a centrist.
Admittedly, this happens less often than it used to. We don’t have Democrats in Name Only (DINOs) like David Boren of Oklahoma or RINOs like Lowell Weicker of Connecticut in the Senate now, possibly because it’s harder for such candidates to raise money in a more polarized atmosphere (among people who work for and donate to campaigns, if not among the electorate as a whole). But any movement to elect more members of Congress with independent personalities is still going to have more promise if it recruits candidates to run in primaries, as opposed to creating one-person political parties all over the United States. In many cases, there are long odds against such a candidate winning a partisan primary, but if he or she can’t turn out the vote in a primary (even if it means registering new voters), it’s hard to believe that the person can build a winning coalition from scratch in a matter of months. And very few voters go for candidates who can’t win, despite what they tell pollsters a year before an election.
Four people have been elected to the Senate as independents in the past decades, and all caucused with a major party in Washington, as opposed to “wreaking some havoc,” as First Read put it. (They are Democrats Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, Angus King of Maine, and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and Republican Lisa Murkowski of Alaska—and Lieberman and Murkowski only ran as independents after losing their parties’ primaries.) All of them revealed their partisan leanings before getting elected. Voters don’t like enigmas.
[…] a nine-point plan to make government work with legislation centered around seemingly modest fixes such as moving to a two-year budgeting cycle, withholding congressional pay if lawmakers fail to pass a budget, and curbing agency travel expenses by replacing meetings with video conferencing.
The only bill that has advanced so far is a weakened version of “No Budget, No Pay.” The bill, which President Obama signed in February, directed each chamber to adopt a budget for fiscal 2014 but did not require a budget conference. Members’ pay would be held in escrow if their chamber did not pass a budget, instead of being docked permanently, as the No Labels group originally proposed.
There are only two realistic ways to make Congress, and Washington, more “effective.” One is to hand control of the White House and both houses of Congress to the same party (which most voters want to do, even if they disagree on the party). The other is for members of Congress to cross party lines in the interest of getting things done. Independents running quixotic campaigns for Congress are not going to “upend” 2014, and the candy-cane notion will disappear when the new year begins and there’s new drama