elly99 commited on
Commit
f657066
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d017937

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +55 -24
README.md CHANGED
@@ -47,14 +47,18 @@ metrics:
47
 
48
 
49
  # MarCognity-AI
50
- **The framework that teaches artificial intelligence how to think.**
51
  ---
52
 
53
  ## Table of Contents
54
 
55
  - [What is MarCognity-AI](#what-is-marcognity-ai)
56
  - [Origins](#origins)
 
57
  - [Vision](#vision)
 
 
 
58
  - [Why Use It](#why-use-it)
59
  - [Core Capabilities](#core-capabilities)
60
  - [Usage Examples](#usage-examples)
@@ -90,7 +94,7 @@ MarCognity wasn’t born in a lab.
90
  It was born from a curious, free, and determined mind.
91
 
92
  ---
93
- ## Community Recognition
94
 
95
  MarCognity-AI has already sparked resonance across major AI communities.
96
 
@@ -130,40 +134,49 @@ It integrates semantic memory, ethical auditing, and scientific validation to tr
130
 
131
  The official version of the code and the full research paper have been permanently archived on Zenodo and are citable using their Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
132
 
133
- | **MarCognity-AI** | [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.17855185.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17855185) |
134
  |---|---|
135
- | **Permanent DOI** | `10.5281/zenodo.17855185` |
136
- | **Access Publication** | [Full Research Paper (PDF) & Code (Zenodo)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17855185) |
137
 
138
 
139
 
140
  ---
141
-
142
  ## Limitations
143
 
144
- LLM‑based metacognition collapses at the same fault line:
145
- it confuses linguistic coherence with epistemic awareness.
146
  The model can say “this answer is unclear,” but not “I don’t know if what I’m saying is true.
147
 
148
  ---
149
-
150
  ## Research Status
151
-
152
- MarCognity-AI is an exploratory research framework. It is not a production-ready system.
153
- Its purpose is to expose and study structural limits of LLM-based metacognition,
154
  particularly the collapse between linguistic coherence and epistemic awareness.
 
155
 
156
  ---
157
  ## Observed Fracture
 
158
  During the development of MarCognity-AI, a recurring failure mode emerged:
159
 
160
- LLM-based metacognitive layers reliably optimize for linguistic coherence but fail to surface epistemic uncertainty as an explicit signal.
 
161
 
162
- The system can evaluate how an answer is written, yet cannot account for whether what is being said is actually known, verifiable, or admissible.
 
 
163
 
164
- This collapse between coherence and awareness is not treated here as a bug to be fixed, but as a structural fracture to be studied.
 
 
165
 
166
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
167
 
168
  ## Why Use It
169
 
@@ -181,6 +194,9 @@ MarCognity isn’t just intelligent. It’s **aware**.
181
  ### 4. Reflective Cognitive Journal
182
  Each response is accompanied by a detailed **metacognitive reflection**, saved in Markdown for analysis and reuse.
183
 
 
 
 
184
  ---
185
 
186
  ## Core Capabilities
@@ -193,6 +209,7 @@ Each response is accompanied by a detailed **metacognitive reflection**, saved i
193
  - Version archiving in FAISS memory
194
  - Ethical risk and linguistic bias analysis
195
  - Reflective cognitive journal with Markdown export
 
196
 
197
  ---
198
 
@@ -210,6 +227,18 @@ Each response is accompanied by a detailed **metacognitive reflection**, saved i
210
  **Input:** “Compare the view of consciousness in philosophy and neuroscience.”
211
  **Output:** Structured response + sources + cognitive visualization + reflective journal
212
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
213
  ---
214
 
215
  ## Try It Now
@@ -248,14 +277,16 @@ It shows step-by-step how the agent generates, evaluates, and reflects on a resp
248
 
249
  ## Cognitive Architecture
250
 
251
- | Module | Function |
252
- |----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
253
- | Problem Classification | Automatic recognition of input type |
254
- | Academic Prompting | Structuring complex multidisciplinary queries |
255
- | Scientific Retrieval | Asynchronous querying of multiple open-access sources |
256
- | Semantic Evaluation | Response analysis with logical scoring |
257
- | FAISS Memory | Archiving and comparison with past responses |
258
- | Cognitive Visualization | Uses HuggingFace’s transformers library and selected models for scientific content processing, ethical analysis, and cognitive representation |
 
 
259
 
260
  ---
261
 
@@ -282,4 +313,4 @@ It is a threshold.
282
  An invitation to rethink how artificial intelligence can reflect, improve, and act with awareness.
283
  This project is released under the Apache 2.0
284
 
285
- > _“Every response is a threshold. Every reflection, an act of agency.”_
 
47
 
48
 
49
  # MarCognity-AI
50
+ **A research framework for reflective and epistemically transparent AI systems**
51
  ---
52
 
53
  ## Table of Contents
54
 
55
  - [What is MarCognity-AI](#what-is-marcognity-ai)
56
  - [Origins](#origins)
57
+ - [Community Recognition](#community-recognition)
58
  - [Vision](#vision)
59
+ - [Limitations](#limitations)
60
+ - [Research Status](#research-status)
61
+ - [Observed Fracture](#observed-fracture)
62
  - [Why Use It](#why-use-it)
63
  - [Core Capabilities](#core-capabilities)
64
  - [Usage Examples](#usage-examples)
 
94
  It was born from a curious, free, and determined mind.
95
 
96
  ---
97
+ ## Early Community Interactions (Non-Endorsement)
98
 
99
  MarCognity-AI has already sparked resonance across major AI communities.
100
 
 
134
 
135
  The official version of the code and the full research paper have been permanently archived on Zenodo and are citable using their Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
136
 
137
+ | **MarCognity-AI** | [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.17855185.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18435049) |
138
  |---|---|
139
+ | **Permanent DOI** | `https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18435049` |
140
+ | **Access Publication** | [Full Research Paper (PDF) & Code (Zenodo)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18435049) |
141
 
142
 
143
 
144
  ---
 
145
  ## Limitations
146
 
147
+ LLM‑based metacognition collapses at the same fault line: it confuses linguistic coherence with epistemic awareness.
 
148
  The model can say “this answer is unclear,” but not “I don’t know if what I’m saying is true.
149
 
150
  ---
 
151
  ## Research Status
152
+ MarCognity-AI is an exploratory research framework.
153
+ It is not a production-ready system.
154
+ Its purpose is to expose and study structural limits of LLM-based metacognition,
155
  particularly the collapse between linguistic coherence and epistemic awareness.
156
+ This line of investigation is ongoing.
157
 
158
  ---
159
  ## Observed Fracture
160
+
161
  During the development of MarCognity-AI, a recurring failure mode emerged:
162
 
163
+ LLM-based metacognitive layers reliably optimize for linguistic coherence
164
+ but fail to surface epistemic uncertainty as an explicit signal.
165
 
166
+ The system can evaluate how an answer is written,
167
+ yet cannot account for whether what is being said is actually known,
168
+ verifiable, or admissible.
169
 
170
+ This collapse between coherence and awareness
171
+ is not treated here as a bug to be fixed,
172
+ but as a structural fracture to be studied.
173
 
174
  ---
175
+ ## Note for Readers
176
+ The demo and cognitive journal in this repository are meant to expose a reproducible failure mode, not a solved system.
177
+
178
+ ---
179
+
180
 
181
  ## Why Use It
182
 
 
194
  ### 4. Reflective Cognitive Journal
195
  Each response is accompanied by a detailed **metacognitive reflection**, saved in Markdown for analysis and reuse.
196
 
197
+ ### 5. Epistemic Transparency
198
+ The Skeptical Agent exposes unsupported claims through a structured verification report, making epistemic uncertainty explicit.
199
+
200
  ---
201
 
202
  ## Core Capabilities
 
209
  - Version archiving in FAISS memory
210
  - Ethical risk and linguistic bias analysis
211
  - Reflective cognitive journal with Markdown export
212
+ - Epistemic Verification Layer (Skeptical Agent): decomposes responses into claims and checks them against sources
213
 
214
  ---
215
 
 
227
  **Input:** “Compare the view of consciousness in philosophy and neuroscience.”
228
  **Output:** Structured response + sources + cognitive visualization + reflective journal
229
 
230
+ ### Epistemic Verification Example
231
+ Input: “Explain quantum entanglement.”
232
+ Output:
233
+
234
+ Generated response
235
+
236
+ Claim-by-claim verification
237
+
238
+ VERIFIED / EPISTEMIC FAILURE report
239
+
240
+ Reasoning based on provided sources
241
+
242
  ---
243
 
244
  ## Try It Now
 
277
 
278
  ## Cognitive Architecture
279
 
280
+ | Module | Function |
281
+ |------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
282
+ | Problem Classification | Automatic recognition of input type |
283
+ | Academic Prompting | Structuring complex multidisciplinary queries |
284
+ | Scientific Retrieval | Asynchronous querying of multiple openaccess sources |
285
+ | Semantic Evaluation | Response analysis with logical and semantic scoring |
286
+ | Skeptical Agent | Sentence‑level claim verification against provided sources; flags unsupported statements and produces an epistemic report |
287
+ | FAISS Memory | Archiving and comparison with past responses, including reflective evaluations |
288
+ | Cognitive Visualization| Scientific content processing, ethical analysis, and conceptual representation using selected transformer models |
289
+
290
 
291
  ---
292
 
 
313
  An invitation to rethink how artificial intelligence can reflect, improve, and act with awareness.
314
  This project is released under the Apache 2.0
315
 
316
+ > _“Every response is a threshold. Every reflection, an act of agency.”_