<s>
Florence	B-Application
v	I-Application
.	I-Application
Shurtleff	I-Application
,	O
Civil	O
No	O
.	O
</s>
<s>
2:05CV000485	O
(	O
D	O
.	O
Utah	O
2012	O
)	O
,	O
was	O
a	O
case	O
in	O
which	O
the	O
U.S.	O
District	O
Court	O
for	O
the	O
District	O
of	O
Utah	O
issued	O
an	O
order	O
stating	O
that	O
individuals	O
could	O
not	O
be	O
prosecuted	O
for	O
posting	O
adult	O
content	O
that	O
was	O
constitutionally	O
protected	O
on	O
general	O
access	O
websites	O
,	O
nor	O
could	O
they	O
be	O
civilly	O
liable	O
for	O
failing	O
to	O
prevent	O
access	O
to	O
adult	O
content	O
,	O
so	O
long	O
as	O
the	O
material	O
is	O
identifiable	O
by	O
filtering	B-Protocol
software	I-Protocol
.	O
</s>
<s>
The	O
order	O
was	O
the	O
result	O
of	O
a	O
2005	O
lawsuit	O
,	O
The	B-Application
King	I-Application
's	I-Application
English	I-Application
v	I-Application
.	I-Application
Shurtleff	I-Application
,	O
brought	O
by	O
Utah	O
bookstores	O
,	O
artists	O
,	O
Internet	O
Service	O
Providers	O
and	O
the	O
other	O
organizations	O
challenging	O
the	O
constitutionality	O
of	O
certain	O
portions	O
of	O
a	O
Utah	O
law	O
intended	O
to	O
protect	O
minors	O
from	O
adult	O
content	O
.	O
</s>
<s>
The	O
bill	O
correspondingly	O
required	O
Internet	O
service	O
providers	O
(	O
"	O
ISPs	O
"	O
)	O
to	O
block	O
access	O
or	O
provide	O
filtering	B-Protocol
software	I-Protocol
for	O
these	O
websites	O
.	O
</s>
<s>
This	O
lawsuit	O
was	O
originally	O
known	O
as	O
The	B-Application
King	I-Application
's	I-Application
English	I-Application
v	I-Application
.	I-Application
Shurtleff	I-Application
for	O
a	O
Utah	O
bookshop	O
named	O
as	O
plaintiffs	O
in	O
the	O
lawsuit	O
.	O
</s>
<s>
The	O
judge	O
denied	O
plaintiff	O
's	O
motion	O
for	O
reconsideration	O
,	O
and	O
the	O
case	O
was	O
subsequently	O
captioned	O
as	O
"	O
Nathan	O
Florence	B-Application
v	I-Application
.	I-Application
Shurtleff	I-Application
,	O
"	O
now	O
named	O
for	O
Florence	O
,	O
who	O
was	O
a	O
Utah	O
painter	O
who	O
depicted	O
nudes	O
in	O
some	O
of	O
his	O
works	O
.	O
</s>
