|Numéro de publication||US5233991 A|
|Type de publication||Octroi|
|Numéro de demande||US 07/742,249|
|Date de publication||10 août 1993|
|Date de dépôt||8 août 1991|
|Date de priorité||8 août 1991|
|État de paiement des frais||Payé|
|Numéro de publication||07742249, 742249, US 5233991 A, US 5233991A, US-A-5233991, US5233991 A, US5233991A|
|Inventeurs||Graham A. Wright|
|Cessionnaire d'origine||Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University|
|Exporter la citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citations de brevets (2), Citations hors brevets (10), Référencé par (23), Classifications (11), Événements juridiques (8)|
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet|
This invention relates generally to the use of magnetic resonance imaging for determining properties of moving fluids such as oxygen saturation of blood, for example, and more particularly the invention relates to determining blood oxygen saturation or other property based on the spin-spin relaxation time (T2) of the fluid.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, also called magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a non-destructive method for the analysis of materials and represents a new approach to medical imaging. It is completely non-invasive and does not involve ionizing radiation. In very general terms, nuclear magnetic moments are excited at specific spin precession frequencies which are proportional to the local magnetic field. The radio-frequency signals resulting from the precession of these spins are received using pickup coils. By manipulating the magnetic fields, an array of signals is provided representing different regions of the volume. These are combined to produce a volumetric image of the nuclear spin density of the body.
A descriptive series of papers on NMR appeared in the June 1980 issue of the IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. NS-27, pp. 1220-1225. The basic concepts are described in the lead article, "Introduction to the Principles of NMR," by W. V. House, pp. 1220-1226, which employ computed tomography reconstruction concepts for reconstructing cross-sectional images. A number of two-and three-dimensional imaging methods are described. Medical applications of NMR are discussed by Pykett in "NMR Imaging in Medicine,": Scientific American, May 1982, pp. 78-88, and by Mansfield and Morris, NMR Imaging in Biomedicine, Academic Press, 1982.
Briefly, a strong static magnetic field is employed to line up atoms whose nuclei have an odd number of protons and/or neutrons, that is, have spin angular momentum and a magnetic dipole moment. A second RF magnetic field, applied as a single pulse transverse to the first, is then used to pump energy into these nuclei, flipping them over, for example to 90° to 180°. After excitation the nuclei gradually return to alignment with the static field and give up the energy in the form of weak but detectable free induction decay (FID). These FID signals are used by a computer to produce images.
The excitation frequency, and the FID frequency, is defined by the Larmor relationship which states that the angular frequency, ω0, and the so-called magnetogyric ratio, γ, a fundamental physical constant for each nuclear species:
Accordingly, by superimposing a linear gradient field, Bz =z.Gz, on the static uniform field, B0, which defines the Z axis, for example, nuclei in a selected X-Y plane can be excited by proper choice of the frequency spectrum of the transverse excitation field applied along the X or Y axis. Similarly, a gradient field can be applied in the X-Y plane during detection of the FID signals to spatially localize the FID signals in the plane. The angle of nuclei spin flip in response to an RF pulse excitation is proportional to the integral of the pulse over time.
The spins of excited nuclei have two relaxation times associated therewith. The spin-lattice relaxation time, T1, is equivalent to the recovery time for spins in realigning with the longitudinal magnetization. The spin-spin relaxation time T2, depends on the decay of the transverse component of the magnetization. Both relaxation times are tissue specific.
Thulborn, et al., "Oxygenation Dependence of the Transverse Relaxation Time of Water Proteins in Whole Blood at High Field," Biophysica Acta 714, pp. 265-270, 1982 reported that the oxygen saturation of blood affected the T2 of the blood for in vitro experiments. However, for in vivo applications the motions of the body and/or of blood itself can adversely affect measurements of magnet resonance signals. Further, a more accurate model is required for correlating measurements of T2 and the corresponding values of blood oxygen saturation for experimental conditions used on in vivo measurement, in people.
The present invention is directed to a method and apparatus for determining the T2 relaxation time of vascular blood (in situ) and estimating oxygen saturation in the blood. The invention is applicable in other systems involving moving fluids wherein magnetic resonance signals are indicative of properties of the fluids.
Accordingly, an object of the invention is MRI apparatus for use in determining a specific property of a moving fluid based on the spin-spin relaxation time of the fluid which is determined by well-known methods from a series of measurements (at least 2) taken at different delays or echo times (TE) after the initial excitation.
Another object of the invention is a method of determining a fluid property such as oxygen saturation of blood.
A feature of the invention is the use of final section-selective 180° pulse before a single readout of the pulse echo per excitation where the time between the pulse and the echo is kept constant for measurements at different TE.
Another feature of the invention is the use of a train of 180° pulses between the excitation and the final 180° that regularly refocus all fluid MRI signals that could end up in the section of interest at data acquisition. The pulses in the train are equally spaced. To adjust TE for different measurements, different numbers of pulses are used (e.g. 0, 1, 2, 4 . . . ), or different spacings of pulses are used.
In accordance with one embodiment for obtaining oxygen saturation of blood, a simplified Luz-Meiboom model for the oxygen saturation of blood (%HbO2) based on measured spin-spin relaxation time is established by using in vitro measurements to establish model constants for a particular subject. Thereafter, in vivo measurements of spin-spin relaxation time will result in a corresponding value of oxygen saturation of blood based on the model.
The invention and objects and features thereof will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description and appended claims when taken with the drawings.
FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D illustrate the arrangement of conventional MRI apparatus and magnetic fields generated therein.
FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of MRI imaging apparatus.
FIG. 3 illustrates a conventional basic pulse sequence for exciting a slab for projection imaging.
FIG. 4 is a pulse sequence for the in vivo estimation of T2b in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 5 is a projection image of blood samples.
FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D are plots of T2b versus %HbO2 for different spacings of refocusing pulses.
FIG. 7 is images used for the estimation of T2b in vivo.
Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1A is a perspective view partially in section illustrating coil apparatus in an NMR imaging system, and FIGS. 1B-1D illustrate field gradients which can be produced in the apparatus of FIG. 1A. This apparatus is discussed by Hinshaw and Lent, "An Introduction to NMR Imaging: From the Bloch Equation to the Imaging Equation," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 71, No. 3, Mar. 1983, pp. 338-350. Briefly, the uniform static field B0 is generated by the magnetic comprising the coil pair 10. A gradient field G(x) is generated by a complex gradient coil set which can be wound on the cylinder 12. An RF field B1 is generated by a saddle coil 14. A patient undergoing imaging would be positioned along the Z axis within the saddle coil 14.
In FIG. 1B an X gradient field is shown which is parallel to the static field B0 and varies linearly with distance along the X axis but does not vary with distance along the Y or Z axes. FIGS. 1C and 1D are similar representations of the Y gradient and Z gradient fields, respectively.
FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the imaging apparatus as disclose din NMR- A Perspective on Imaging, General Electric Company, 1982. A computer 20 is programmed to control the operation of the NMR apparatus and process FID signals detected therefrom. The gradient field is energized by a gradient amplifier 22, and the RF coils for impressing an RF magnetic moment at the Larmor frequency are controlled by the transmitter 24 and the RF coils 26. After the selected nuclei have been flipped, the RF coils 26 are employed to detect the FID signal which is passed to the receiver 28 and thence through digitizer 30 for processing by computer 20.
FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating applied RF pulses for a 180° flip angle and a 90° flip angle followed by a "time reversal" 180° pulse and the associated Z axis magnetic field gradient applied during application of the RF pulses. The illustrated pulses are conventional sinc pulses which have front and back lobes with a main RF pulse therebetween. From this representation, it can be seen that the angle of flip is proportional to the area under the pulse.
The present invention utilizes MR imaging signals to determine a characteristic of a moving fluid such as oxygen saturation of blood.
The determination of blood oxygen saturation finds application in assessing cardiac output, consumption of oxygen in perfused organs, and the severity of vascular shunts such as those found in congenital heart diseases. Available oximetry methods are based primarily on optical transmittance and reflectance differences between oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin. The resulting measure of blood oxygen saturation is the percentage of hemoglobin that is oxygenated, abbreviated as %HbO2. The poor penetration of tissue by light, however, limits the non-invasive monitoring of %HbO2 to superficially accessible regions. The determination of oxygen saturation in deep vascular structures currently must be made via direct sampling of the blood of interest.
Heretofore, investigators speculated that MRI measurement of T2 should be attainable; however, only qualitative in vivo signal variations attributed to the dependence of T2b on %HbO2 have been reported. Quantitative in vivo work demands a calibration of the T2b versus %HbO2 relationship for the specific experimental setup. The variations among experimental data fits for this relationship derived under a wide range of conditions with MR spectrometers demonstrate that the underlying mechanism is not adequately understood. In particular, the parametric fit of the T2b versus %HbO2 relationship appears to be sensitive to field strength and the time between refocusing pulses in a way not predicted by the Luz-Meiboom model used by most investigators. Only one known study has directly measure T2b for a wide range of %HbO2. This study examined rat blood on a 4.3-T spectrometer that refocused the signal every 2 msec. See Thulborn, et al. "Oxygenation Dependence of the Transverse Relaxation Time of Water Proteins in Whole Blood at High Field," Biophysica Acta 714, pp. 265-270, 1982. Thus, for in vivo %HbO2 estimation, this relationship must be experimentally quantified for conditions resembling as closely as possible those to be used for human in vivo studies.
Before performing this calibration, one must address a more basic challenge: accurate estimation of T2b in vivo in a manner consistent with the estimation of HbO2. Difficulties that arise include (a) isolation of the blood signal of interest, (b) variation in signal strengths of blood at different TEs due to effects of flow such as wash-in of unexcited spins and dephasing, (c) artifacts due to motion (breathing and blood pulsatility), and (d) the poorer B0 and B1 homogeneity combined with weaker B0 and B1 fields available on wholebody imagers compared with those of spectrometers. This challenge is exacerbated because the vessels of interest include those of the mediastinum, where imaging conditions are the most demanding.
The origin of the %HbO2 effect on T2b is the irreversible dephasing of spins undergoing exchange and/or bounded diffusion through gradient fields in and around intact red blood cells. These gradients are established when B0 is shifted for water inside the red blood cells due to the presence of paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin. This frequency shift is proportional to the concentration of deoxyhemoglobin, found only therein directly reflecting blood oxygen saturation. Rapidly and regularly applying 180° pulses reduces the range of frequencies a spin experiences before it is "refocused" and hence reduces the degree to which this loss of coherence is irreversible.
The Luz-Meiboom model of relaxation in the presence of exchange between two sites at different frequencies is a good starting point for describing how this situation affects T2b : ##EQU1## T20 is the T2 of fully oxygenated blood; τex is a measure of the average time required for a proton to move between the two sites; ω0 is the resonant proton frequency; α is a dimensionless value related to the susceptibility of deoxyhemoglobin and the geometry of the erythrocyte, so that αω0 [1-(%HbO2 /100%)] can be considered the frequency difference between the two "sites" at which the protons exchange according to the Luz-Meiboom model; PA is the fraction of protons resident at one of the sites under exchange; τ180 is the interval between refocusing 180° pulses in the MR imaging sequence. The strength of the %HbO2 effect depends on field strength through the ω0 term, increasing quadratically with B0 and therefore favoring the use of high-field-strength imagers for the study. The sensitivity of T2b to %HbO2 increases as τ180 increases, particularly when τ180 is on the order of τ ex. Although the Luz-Meiboom model was developed with the assumption of many short refocusing pulses for which τ180 is much less than T2, stimulations of the underlying exchange equations indicate that the model is equally value even when τ180 is equal to T20, as long as a α remains relatively small.
The present invention does not require all the degrees of freedom given in the Luz-Meiboom model. The invention requires parameterizing the T2 versus %HbO2 relationship in healthy subjects for a particular setup, not in exploring the details of the underlying mechanism as reflected by the parameters α, τex, and PA. These parameters can therefore be lumped into a single parameter K, which depends on the controllable variable τ180.ω0 is also subsumed under K for one field strength. Thus, measurements of T2b for a range of %HbO2 will be fitted to a simplified Luz-Meiboom model for a small set of practical τ180 values: ##EQU2##
The size of the %HbO2 effect increases with operating field strength. The examples herein are performed on a 1.5-T Signa unit (GE Medical systems, Milwaukee) which is among the highest-field-strength whole-body imagers that are widely used.
In Equation (2), the size of the %HbO2 effect is reflected in the parameters t20 and K (for sufficiently large τ180). When examining these parameters human blood is considered only under normal physiologic conditions-specifically, intact red blood cells suspended in plasma with a hematocrit around 45% and at 37° C. Temperature and hematocrit affect T20 and, to a lesser extent, K. Complete cell lysis eliminates the oxygen effect (K=0), while the development of methemoglobin in intact cells found in clots will increase K. Under normal conditions, T20 is approximately 220 msec ±30, per studies of oxygenated blood in a 1.4-T field. On the basis of Thulborn, et al. supra, K(τ180 →∞, B0 =1.5T) is approximately 40 sec-1. T2b should be between 60 and 100 msec for sufficiently long τ180 when &HbO2 is about 50%, the minimum level that is likely of interest for studies of vascular blood. This indicates that T2b variations should be sufficient to reflect relatively small changes in %HbO2.
A second question is how fast one can refocus the signal while still realizing most of the %HbO2 effect (longer τ180 results in greater %HbO2 effect). More rapid refocusing (shorter τ180) is desirable to maintain spin coherence in the presence of complicated flow and to provide a sufficient range of TEs to accurately estimate T2b. The full Luz-Meiboom model indicates that the dependence of 1/T2b on τ180 is greatest for τ180 ≈τex and saturates as τ180 increases beyond about 5τex. Ideally, one would use the value of τ180 at which this saturation begins. Independent of the above concerns, the minimum achievable τ180 is about 6 msec with the current experimental setup, limited by power absorption concerns and technical limitations of the radio frequency (RF) amplifier.
A reasonable τ180 is determined in part by the magnitude of the %HbO2 effect. To accurately measure TE, τ180 should be at most on the order of half of the T2b of interest. This suggests that one needs only consider a τ180 of less than 50 msec. Where the saturation point for the effect of τ180 lies is not clear in the literature. Nonetheless, considering values of τ180 only up to 50 msec appears reasonable. From the data fits of Thulborn, et al. (determined primarily from data acquired at 4.3 T), one would not expect K to vary much with τ180 over the range of practical interest (>6 msec). From experiments performed primarily at 1.4T, K should increase significantly as τ180 increases from 6 to 50 msec and should then level off slowly for further increases in τ180.
For spectrometer studies of blood, CPMG (Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill) sequence is used most often to measure T2b. A version of this lies at the heart of the sequence herein; however, several modifications are made to address the challenges of the in vivo environment. The resulting sequence (FIG. 4) is that originally introduced for the purpose of flow-independent angiography augmented to include (a) spatial selectivity without wash-in effects, (b) reduced flow dephasing, and (c) faster image acquisition (to minimize, where necessary, effects of body motion).
To suppress fat signal, the sequence beings with a short T1 inversion recover (STIR) sequence (TI=120 msec) followed by a frequency-selective 90° pulse that excites only the water protons. Fat is often found surrounding vessels and just under the skin. By eliminating its signal, one can minimize its contribution to signal measure in the vessel caused by partial-volume averaging and by blurring of fat signal (which occurs when one uses time-varying gradients of relatively long duration at data acquisition). Furthermore, artifacts from the normally high-signal-intensity fat in the chest wall that are due to breathing are suppressed. STIR minimizes the fat signal in the longitudinal magnetization at excitation, which as the added advantage of minimizing spurious signal from fat generated by the imperfect hard refocusing pulses that follow. Frequency-selective excitation provides additional fat suppression because it is difficult to properly tune T1 to achieve the desired level of suppression.
After excitation, the transverse magnetization is refocused every τ180 msec by rectangular 180° pulses. This pulse train establishes the constant refocusing interval required for accurate T2b estimation in the Luz-Meiboom model. It also restores the coherence of spins dephased because of flow through B0 inhomogeneities. To minimize flow dephasing, spolling gradients during the refocusing train are not used; however, this could lead to the propagation of spurious signals. One can generate strong spurious signals and lose significant amounts of desired signal because of errors in the axis and amplitude of flip angles, particularly when there are many pulses in the refocusing train. To minimize the effects of these errors, caused by B0 and B1 inhomogeneities, the sign of the 180° pulses is varied according to the MLEV pattern whenever there are at least four pulses in the train. This pattern of sign variation is more robust than the standard CPMG pattern in the presence of B0 inhomogeneities; however, under this scheme one should acquire signal only after 2n pulses, where n is an integer.
As the first step in isolating blood signal by spatial location, the final refocusing 180° pulse is section selective and is bracketed by a pair of spoiling gradients to dephase the out-of-section signal. These gradients and the section-select gradient are flow compensated. Effects of wash-in and of the physical dispersion of tagged spins on blood signal are avoided because this is the only spatially selective pulse in the sequence and it is as close as possible to the data acquisition.
Finally, signal from the section is spatially encoded during data acquisition. Two variations are implemented. In the more standard case, the two-dimensional Fourier transform (2DFT) encoding of the original flow independent angiography sequence is used. To minimize flow dephasing with this arrangement , all spatial-encoding gradients (notably the phase-encoding lobe and the dephasing lobe of the readout gradient) are kept compact and close to the data acquisition interval. In the second case, illustrated in FIG. 4, spiral gradients rapidly cover k space during data acquisition. See Meyer, et al. "A Comparison of Fast Spiral Sequences for Cardiac Imaging and Angiography" (abstr); in Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1990; 403. This version is useful when the duration of image acquisition is an issue. For instance, when imaging the chest, acquiring an entire image in a single breath hold minimizes motion effects. For this gain, poorer signal-to-noise ratios (S.Ns) and greater sensitivity to blurring caused by B0 inhomogeneity must be accepted. Each spiral readout begins at the center of k space and at the center of the spin echo to minimize the effects of flow and B0 inhomogeneities. Further more, the spiral trajectory has well-behaved gradient moments, maintaining flow coherence throughout the acquisition.
Timing of the data acquisitions can decrease sensitivity to the presence of flow. To prevent loss of coherence in subsequent echoes due to flow effects, signal is acquired at only one TE per excitation. To measure T2, we repeat the sequence at three to four different TEs. To minimize effects of flow pulsatility, the sequence is gated to the cardiac cycle so that readout occurs in the same period of diastole independent of the selected TE. Data are acquired once every other heartbeat to maximize S/N per unit imaging time and to allow adequate T1 recovery to minimize effects of variable R-R intervals. Extra rectangular 180° pulses are included after acquisition for all but the longest TE of interest to ensure that the effective recovery time (TRe) is independent of the TE at which the signal is received.
While the resulting sequence is rather involved, each element is chosen for its simplicity and/or availability with the objective of expeditious implementation. Potential variations include the use of crafter pulses for frequency-selective excitation or more robust refocusing as well as alternative rapid acquisition strategies.
As noted earlier, all experiments were performed on a 1.5-T Signa unit. The system includes superconducting and resistive shims with which field variations of less than 20 Hz can be achieved over a 20-cm field of view in a uniform phantom. No supplementary shimming was done for individual experiments. Good shims minimize flow dephasing and diffusion effects during the refocusing train, as well as blurring when data are acquired with the spiral gradients. B1 amplitudes are limited to about 625 Hz. The system is equipped with 10-mT/m gradients with which one can generate a 192×192 image of a 24-cm field of view in eight 40-msec spiral acquisitions. See Meyer, et al., supra. Shielded gradient coils minimize eddy current effects during such acquisitions. All cardiac gating was performed with a plethysmography.
Before experimenting on blood, demonstration that the features added to the sequence to address in vivo issued do not affect T2 estimation is made. Also shown is that the sequence does not introduce measurement bias in the presence of flowing material. The phantom used in this study was plastic tubing with an inner diameter of 0.6 cm containing a manganese chloride solution with a T1 of approximately 1,200 msec and a T2 of approximately 120 msec. The tubing runs through a pump and settling system so that steady flow of fluid can be achieved. The phantom is a crude model of blood in a vessel. The tubing runs parallel to the main field in the magnet bore to minimize susceptibility effects, was measured with the following sequences:
Sequence A: a standard multi-echo 2DFT sequence with a TR of 2,000 msec and TEs of 48, 96, 144, and 192 msec, acquiring axial sections through the tube; TRe =1,808 msec.
Sequence B: a simplified version of the proposed sequence with only a rectangular excitation pulse, the train of hard refocusing pulses, each bracketed by spoiling gradients, and a 2DFT phase encoding and readout to produce coronal projection images. One TE is acquired per excitation; τ180 =24 msec; TE=48, 96, and 192 msec; TRe =1,808 msec for each image. This sequence is also repeated with a τ180 of 24 msec; TEs of 24, 48, 96, 192, and 384 msec; and a TRe of 2,000 msec.
Sequence C: the complete proposed sequence, including STIR, frequency-selective excitation, the refocusing train without spoiling gradients, a final spatially selective pulse, and spiral gradients during data acquisition to generate axial sections. τ180 =24 msec; TE=24, 72, 120, 216, and 408 msec; TR=2,000 msec. Extra refocusing pulses after data acquisition make the effective T1 recovery time TRe 1,592 msec for each TE.
The effects of flow on T2b measurement were examined with sequence C in the presence of steady flows of 9, 18, and 30 cm/sec. For a flow of 18 cm/sec, this sequence was repeated with τ180 values of 6 and 12 msec to ensure that varying the refocusing rate in the presence of flow does not bias T2b measurements.
In these and all later experiments, T2 values were estimated with a weighted least-squares fit of a monoexponential decay to the average signal intensities in a small region of the phantom.
TABLE 1______________________________________Table 1 summarizes the T2 estimates:Estimates of T2 of Phantom under VariousExperimental Conditions Flow RateSequence τ180 (msec) (cm/sec) T2(msec)______________________________________A 48 0 95B 48 0 121B 24 0 122C 24 0 121C 24 9 116C 24 18 117C 24 28 115C 12 18 115C 6 18 120______________________________________
In all cases, monoexponential decay fit the data well. The cases, monoexponential decay fit the data well. The standard error in repeat measurements of T2 was about 3 msec. The commercial multi-echo sequence (A) yielded significantly smaller T2 estimates than the two versions (B and C) of the proposed sequence. When we repeated the measurements with the commercial sequence but used only a single echo per acquisition and a very long TR, we obtained T2 values comparable with those found with sequences B and C. Hence, the commercial multi-echo sequence appears to introduce a biasing error. Further investigation of this problem was beyond the scope of this study; however, potential sources of such errors in multi-echo sequences on imagers have bene investigated by others. Both the simplified version (B) and the complete version (C) of the proposed sequence yielded the same T2 values for stationary fluid. T2 measurements with sequence C were relatively independent of velocity for steady flows. Similarly, varying τ180 in the presence of steady flow did not affect T2 measurements. Thus, the proposed sequence seems to reflect true transverse relaxation under various conditions. These results also add credence to the use of the relationship between T2b and %HbO2 -established with in vitro experiments in which stationary blood was imaged with sequence B-in estimating %HbO2 levels of flowing blood in vivo from T2b determined with sequence C.
To establish a quantitative relationship between T2b and %HbO2, the T2s of human blood oxygenated to varying degrees were measures for a practical range of τ180 values. The parameters K and T2b of Equation (2) were determined by a least-squares fit to the resulting data.
Blood was drawn via venipuncture form five healthy volunteers after their informed consent was obtained. In some cases, the subject's arm was cooled in water (18° C.) to reduce oxygen saturation of the venous blood. No chemicals were added to further reduce %HbO2. The samples were citrated and then aerated to varying levels of %HbO2 (as measured with a reflectance oximeter [american Optical, Buffalo]), starting at the level at which the blood was drawn. The samples were then stored in evacuated 5-mL glass tubes in which the %HbO2 levels could be maintained for several hours. This was confirmed by remeasuring the HbO2 of each sample after the T2b measurements. Hematocrit was also measured at this time.
Data for the T2b measurements were acquired within 2 hours after the original blood drawing. Before imaging, sets of blood-containing tubes were immersed in an insulated bath of water doped with MnCl2 (T2<2 msec) at 37° C. to minimize B0 inhomogeneity due to susceptibility and to maintain the blood at body temperature throughout the experiment. A head coil was used for excitation and signal reception. For greater S/N and reduced susceptibility effects, sequence B, the simplified version described in the previous section, was used to measure the T2b values. Specifically, T2b values were measured for τ180 values of 6, 12, 24 and 48 msec. For each τ180, signals were acquired at Tes ranging from 24 to 384 msec; TRe was 2,000 msec. Before each set of measurements, the samples were agitated to minimize settling effects. Sequence C was also run in a subset of the experiments to check for any differences when imaging blood.
The blood samples used in this experiment has HbO2 levels ranging from 30% to 96%. Direct %HbO2 measurements in the samples, obtained before and after T2b measurements, differed on average by about 2%. Hematocrits in different subjects ranges from 42% to 47%. The integrity of the erythrocytes was maintained throughout the study, on the basis of examination of centrifuged sampled.
FIG. 5 depicts one of the images used for the estimation of T2b. The variation in intensity with oxygen weighted image. The T2b of each sample was estimated from the average signal intensity determined in a small square region at about the center of the sample.
Transverse relaxation of the blood is well described by monoexponential decay. Most errors in fitting this model to measured signal intensities can be attributed to random noise in the raw data, on the basis of the results of X 2 tests. The resulting estimates of T2b are plotted in FIG. 6 as a function of the %HbO2 measured for the corresponding samples. Standard errors in the estimates of T2b, based on propagation of random noise in the raw images, range from approximately 0.5 msec for a T2b of 30 msec to 5 msec for a T2b of 250 msec. For each τ180, we estimated K and T20 via a least-squares fit of Equation (2) to the data, weight to allow for the expected error in the T2b values. The resulting parametric values and the corresponding curve firs are presented in FIG. 3.
Equation (2) provides a reasonable fit to the data. There is strong evidence that K varies with τ180 over the range studied (6-48 msec), in general concurrence with spectrometry studies at about the same field strength however, the limited data would yield somewhat lower estimates of τex (3-5 msec). As discussed above, the minimum τ180 value for which K is close to its maximum should be used. The larger K reflects a greater %HbO2 effect, minimizing the propagation of error from the T2b measurement to the %HbO2 estimate. Earlier work, as well as current results, indicates that the influence of τ180 on K decreases as τ180 increases beyond approximately 24 msec, although we still see a significant change from 24 to 48 msec. Using a τ180 of 24 msec gives a reasonable trade-off between maximizing K and minimizing flow effects and provides a sufficient range of TEs for estimating T2b.
Under this arrangement, the standard error in predicting %HbO2 from T2b measured in vitro is about 2.5% over the range of clinical interest (%HbO2 <90%). The reflectance oximeter used as a standard is accurate to ±2% in this range, so this reference is potentially a major source of error. For clinical work, accuracy to within 3% is generally acceptable. For the %HbO2 range of arterial blood (>90%), the model suggests that T2b is much less sensitive to %HbO2 in general, predicting poorer accuracy for such estimates. This may not be a major concern in clinical work because one often simply assumes that arterial blood is fully oxygenated for one uses values of arterial %HbO2 measured in surface regions with a pulse oximeter. Hence, the current level of accuracy of %HbO2 estimates would be practically useful if it could be achieved in vivo.
Of particular interest is the effect of individual differences in hematocrit. There is evidence that 1/T20 varies linearly with hematocrit while K varies quadratically. On the basis of these results, for hematocrits ranging from 30% to 50% (an extreme range encompassing many pathologic conditions), changes in K would introduce at most a 3% error in %HbO2 if not accounted for, while changes in T20 would yield substantially greater errors. Estimates of K for a given τ180 were consistent from subject to subject, while there was weak evidence of individual differences in the parameter T20 (although these differences did not appear to correlate with the small variations in hematocrit).
Using the complete in vivo sequence (sequence C), T2b was measured in several vessels of clinical interest-primarily the aorta, superior vena cava, and pulmonary trunk-sin several health volunteers (with their informed consent). The signals from these vessels were isolated by acquiring an axial section through the pulmonary trunk while the subject lay prone, with a circular surface coil 18 cm in diameter beneath the chest to receive the signal. With use of spiral gradients during readout and reception of signal every other heartbeat during diastole, an image could be acquired in 16 heartbeats, during which the subjects held their breath. This breath-hold interval is quite reasonable for the current study of healthy subjects; however, further development may be required to reduce the interval in patient studies. The resulting image has a resolution of 1.7×1.7×10 mm. To estimate T2b, four to five images were acquired at TEs ranging from 24 to 408 msec. For most subjects, the signal was refocused every 24 msec. The experiments were repeated using τ180 values of 6 and 12 msec in three subjects to demonstrate the effect of τ180 in vivo. T2b values were also estimated with 2DFT data acquisition for vessels in an axial section of the arm and for the descending aorta and inferior vena cava in an axial section of the abdomen in individual subjects.
FIG. 7 shows a set of images of an axial section through the pulmonary trunk in one volunteer, acquired at various TEs. These were used to estimate T2b values in the aorta, superior vena cava, and pulmonary trunk. One can observe the blurring in off-resonance regions caused by susceptibility effects (primarily at the chest wall and where pulmonary arteries enter the lungs) when the signal is acquired with spiral gradients of relatively long duration. Nonetheless, the signals in the vessels of interest are well isolated; indeed, virtually no flow dephasing or wash-in effects are observed in the blood signal, even at the late TEs.
The T2b estimates for this subject and those for several other subjects, determined with the same protocol, are listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________% HbO2 Estimates from Measurements of T2b in Vivo Aorta Superior Vena Cava Pulmonary TrunkSubject T2o (msec)* τ180 (msec) T2b (msec) % HbO2 T2b (msec) % HbO2 T2b (msec) % HbO2__________________________________________________________________________1 224 6 223 97* 185 74 202 81 24 220 96 138 74 161 802 243 12 242 97* 175 75 194 79 24 230 93 155 76 180 813 214 12 213 97* 154 73 162 75 24 196 90 126 72 147 774 196 24 194 97* 139 78 122 735 277 24 274 97* 171 77 186 79__________________________________________________________________________ *T2o chosen so that % HbO2 = 97% for blood in aorta for minimum τ180 used.
Monoexponential decay provides a good fit to the data when estimating the T2b values, although errors are generally greater than those due to random noise alone. Sources of residual error may include dephasing due to complicated flow, the presence of spurious signals, and variations in average R-R interval and breath-hold position between images with different TEs.
These in vivo results reflect, at least qualitatively, the in vitro results. For each subject, venous blood (pulmonary turn, and vena cava) clearly has a shorter T2 than arterial blood (aorta). In four of the five subjects studies, blood in the pulmonary trunk had a longer T2 than that in the superior vena cava. One might infer that the %HbO2 in the pulmonary trunk is greater. Whether this is normally true for healthy subjects is not clear from the medical literature. The range of T2b values is certainly within that measure in vitro. Comparing the T2b values measured with τ180 values of 6 and 24 msec in one subject shows a clearly significant decrease in T2b for venous blood at the longer refocusing time, as expected on the basis of the in vitro results. When the difference in τ180 values was less (12 vs 24 msec), the results were less conclusive, since the T2b of arterial blood changes almost as much as that of venous blood.
Before one can estimate %HbO2 from the measured T2b values, the question remains as to the appropriate parametric values to use in Equation (2). Without evidence to the contrary, it is assumed that the values of K estimated from in vitro data are equally valid for vivo studies. In choosing T20, there are several considerations. In healthy subjects at rest, one would expect that %HbO2 for aortic blood should always be about 97%. This implies that T20 should be only slightly greater than T2b in the aorta. If we fix T20 to the average value obtained form the vitro work, we can expect large errors in estimates of %HbO2 for arterial blood (e.g., estimated %HbO2 is 83% for a T2b of 194 msec in subject 4, if T20 is 250 msec) or meaningless results if T2b is greater than T20. If we use measurements of T2b in the aorta to estimate T20, we are clearly making assumptions about %HbO2 in the arteries and hence have no predictive power for these vessels. For expediency, we use the latter approach to study %HbO2 estimation in the venous blood; however, this clearly unsatisfactory state reinforces the earlier conclusion indicating the need for further study of factors affecting T20. The results are listed in Table 2. The influence of T20 is reduced for the T2 of venous blood; hence, the difference between estimates of %HbO2 obtained with the above two approaches for determining T20 is on average about 3%. Except for subject 5, the %HbO2 estimates would be reduced with a T20 of 250 msec.
There has been described a method of determining characteristics of a moving fluid using magnetic resonance image signals. While the invention has been described with reference to oxygen saturation of blood, the examples are illustrative of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. For example, the invention can be used in determining characteristics of spinal fluid based on T2 measurements. Thus, various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
|Brevet cité||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US4775522 *||16 déc. 1985||4 oct. 1988||Children's Hospital Research Foundation, A Division Of Children's Hospital Medical Center||NMR compositions for indirectly detecting a dissolved gas in an animal|
|US4984574 *||23 nov. 1988||15 janv. 1991||Seth Goldberg||Noninvasive fetal oxygen monitor using NMR|
|1||G. A. Wright, et al., "Estimating Oxygen Saturation of Blood in vivo with MRI at 1.5T," Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, (Works in Progress) Ninth Annual Scientific Meeting and Exhibition Aug. 18-24, 1990 New York, N.Y. USA.|
|2||*||G. A. Wright, et al., Estimating Oxygen Saturation of Blood in vivo with MRI at 1.5T, Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, (Works in Progress) Ninth Annual Scientific Meeting and Exhibition Aug. 18 24, 1990 New York, N.Y. USA.|
|3||Graham A. Wright, et al., "Estimating Oxygen Saturation of Blood in Vivo with MR Imaging at 1.5T1," JMRI, vol. 1 No. 3 275-284, May/Jun. 1991 ©SMRI, 1991.|
|4||*||Graham A. Wright, et al., Estimating Oxygen Saturation of Blood in Vivo with MR Imaging at 1.5T 1 , JMRI, vol. 1 No. 3 275 284, May/Jun. 1991 SMRI, 1991.|
|5||John M. Gomori, et al., "NMR Relaxation Times of Blood: Dependence on Field Strength, Oxidation State, and Cell Integrity," Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 11(4): 684-690, Jul./Aug. ©1987 Raven Press, N.Y.|
|6||*||John M. Gomori, et al., NMR Relaxation Times of Blood: Dependence on Field Strength, Oxidation State, and Cell Integrity, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 11(4): 684 690, Jul./Aug. 1987 Raven Press, N.Y.|
|7||K. R. Thulborn, et al., "Proton Imaging for in Vivo Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Measurements," Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 45, 188-191 (1981). Copyright ©1981 by Academic Press, Inc.|
|8||*||K. R. Thulborn, et al., Proton Imaging for in Vivo Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Measurements, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 45, 188 191 (1981). Copyright 1981 by Academic Press, Inc.|
|9||Keith R. Thulborn, et al., "Oxygenation Dependence of the Transverse Relaxation Time of Water Protons in Whole Blood at High Field," Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 714 (1982) 265-270 ©Elsevier Biomedical Press.|
|10||*||Keith R. Thulborn, et al., Oxygenation Dependence of the Transverse Relaxation Time of Water Protons in Whole Blood at High Field, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 714 (1982) 265 270 Elsevier Biomedical Press.|
|Brevet citant||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US5349519 *||12 nov. 1993||20 sept. 1994||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method for digitally processing signals containing information regarding arterial blood flow|
|US5402785 *||16 août 1991||4 avr. 1995||Trustees Of The University Of Penna||Methods for measuring perfusion using magnetic resonance imaging|
|US5429134 *||27 juin 1994||4 juil. 1995||General Electric Company||Multi-phase fat suppressed MRI cardiac imaging|
|US5553615 *||31 janv. 1994||10 sept. 1996||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Method and apparatus for noninvasive prediction of hematocrit|
|US5755226 *||10 sept. 1996||26 mai 1998||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Method and apparatus for noninvasive prediction of hematocrit|
|US6163154 *||23 déc. 1997||19 déc. 2000||Magnetic Diagnostics, Inc.||Small scale NMR spectroscopic apparatus and method|
|US6339715||30 sept. 1999||15 janv. 2002||Ob Scientific||Method and apparatus for processing a physiological signal|
|US6404197||1 août 2000||11 juin 2002||Magnetic Diagnostic, Inc.||Small scale NMR spectroscopic apparatus and method|
|US6647280||14 janv. 2002||11 nov. 2003||Ob Scientific, Inc.||Method and apparatus for processing a physiological signal|
|US6901281||22 mars 2001||31 mai 2005||Amersham Health As||Method of magnetic resonance imaging|
|US7439738||19 janv. 2007||21 oct. 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Nuclear magnetic resonance detection in inhomogeneous magnetic fields|
|US7750632 *||6 juil. 2010||University Of Pittsburgh - Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education||Method for producing a magnetic resonance image of an object having a short T2 relaxation time|
|US8134365 *||1 avr. 2011||13 mars 2012||Bayer Healthcare Llc||Methods of in-vitro analysis using time-domain NMR spectroscopy|
|US9310451||15 avr. 2011||12 avr. 2016||The Hospital For Sick Children||Magnetic resonance-based method and system for determination of oxygen saturation in flowing blood|
|US20050165295 *||9 nov. 2004||28 juil. 2005||Debiao Li||Local magnetic resonance image quality by optimizing imaging frequency|
|US20070194788 *||19 janv. 2007||23 août 2007||Alexander Pines||Nuclear magnetic resonance detection in inhomogeneous magnetic fields|
|US20080258727 *||24 mars 2008||23 oct. 2008||Yongxian Qian||Method for producing a magnetic resonance image using an ultra-short echo time|
|US20110175614 *||21 juil. 2011||Bayer Healthcare Llc||Methods of in-vitro analysis using time-domain nmr spectroscopy|
|US20150018650 *||12 mai 2014||15 janv. 2015||Masimo Corporation||Physiological monitor|
|WO2000019227A1 *||21 sept. 1999||6 avr. 2000||Nycomed Imaging As||Method of magnetic resonance imaging|
|WO2000062670A1 *||11 avr. 2000||26 oct. 2000||Martin Koch||A non-invasive procedure and an apparatus for determining the hemoglobin content of blood|
|WO2006028588A2 *||21 juil. 2005||16 mars 2006||The Regents Of The University Of California||Nuclear magnetic resonance detection in inhomogeneous magnetic fields|
|WO2011127590A1 *||15 avr. 2011||20 oct. 2011||The Hospital For Sick Children||Magnetic resonance-based method and system for determination of oxygen saturation in flowing blood|
|Classification aux États-Unis||600/410, 600/419|
|Classification internationale||A61B5/00, G01R33/465, A61B5/055|
|Classification coopérative||G01R33/465, A61B5/145, A61B5/055|
|Classification européenne||A61B5/145, G01R33/465, A61B5/055|
|8 août 1991||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANDORD JUNIOR UN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:WRIGHT, GRAHAM A.;REEL/FRAME:005809/0988
Effective date: 19910808
|13 déc. 1994||CC||Certificate of correction|
|29 mars 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH,THE, MARYLAND
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:STANFORD UNIVERSITY;REEL/FRAME:007863/0085
Effective date: 19941230
|26 sept. 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|6 mars 2001||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7
|6 mars 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|6 mars 2001||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|10 févr. 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12