[...] how can I successfully ignore someone who does love me maybe you misread. I wrote "Someone who loves you and respect you and knows you will NOT talk to you if you are not ready to listen." I don't see how you can NOT ignore someone who is NOT talking to you.
So you've given two different answers. The first stating that the parents ("God") does communicate, with those who will listen which implies the children (myself and others) are not listening, therefore the children (myself and others) would have to be ignoring the clear and coherent communication in order to not be listening.
Your second answer now says that the parents ("God") do not even try to communicate because the parents ("God") already knows the children (myself and others) will not listen, which implies that the children (myself and others) would not listen anyway, therefore the children (myself and others) would be capable of ignoring the clear and coherent communication in order to not listen.
In both of your answers you place the blame on the children for the inability of the parents to clearly and coherently communicate with the children.
What you don't realize is that some children (myself) are very willing to listen yet there is no communication and the only answers they get as to why are nonsense like yours.
Your response does not refute the necessity of answering my question "how can I successfully ignore someone who loves me". Your revised answer now raises a new question "do the parents actually love the children if they won't even try to clearly and coherently communicate".
Why is the onus of the parents clearly and coherently communicating on the children and not on the parents?
Do you realize it is the children's fault for not also having imaginary friends?
In order for an imaginary friend to communicate with a child, the child must first imagine the imaginary friend and then the imaginary friend can communicate. What you are basically saying is that my imaginary friend would communicate with me, but I am just not imagining my imaginary friend is communicating with me so it is my fault.
You see, your answer doesn't function with anything that is real and exists, which is why you can't answer the subsequent questions. If "God" exists and was a loving "God", then everyone would know that "God" exists as "God" would clearly and coherently communicate with everyone instead of behaving like an imaginary friend. The existence of "God" would be as clear as everything else that clearly exists, like my neighbors who wave hi, or my actual family, or the Sun shining on a cloudless day.
Let me copy paste my answer to your question
Why do the parents avoid clearly and coherently communicating with the children? They do communicate, with those who listen.
Please don't tell me I do not answer your question because I do my best to not leave any questions without answer.
You answered with a non-answer. There are problems with your answers that cause them to fail to answer the questions.
[...] does that mean I don't comprehend it? No it means that my little niece would understand the sense of my answer. You say they don't, I say they do, simple, makes sense, no?
Actually, I never said they did not comprehend the answer. The thing about comprehension is that for every individual, it is based on their cognitive capacity, understanding and knowledge. It is possible for two people to comprehend something differently.
From your non-answer, it would seem you do infact think that I don't comprehend your answer. Not surprising, and your avoidance of admitting as much is interesting.
[...] parents they've never met and don't even know exist? The only instructions the children have are unclear, vague, incoherent and ambiguous They do know their parents and have met them (at least I did) The instructions are clear for those who are ready to listen to the instructions.
Yet it is not clear to all the children that the parents exist, only the children who insist on imagining the parents exist think that the parents exist.
(of course a baby saying lalala when an adult is trying to teach him something does make the message unclear vague incoherent and/or ambiguous)
Those who do not listen might have a hard time to understand the instructions, that's why people like me are offering help to simplify the instructions, make them more available to those who did not understand them the first time around, hoping that this time they will understand them.
I see, so explain again how it is the baby's fault for not being able to comprehend the communication and thus not being welcomed into heaven?
EDIT: Additionally, you are now confusing listening with comprehension. Even if I don't comprehend what you are saying, I am still listening (or in this case reading), so I can still clearly see that you exist yet the existence of "God" is unclear.
Your earlier answer has now changed to "God does communicate, but only with those who are capable of comprehending the communication". Do you notice how you have placed yourself above me, as if you are better than me and that is why you get to interact with the most awesome being who created everything. Do you notice how you've defined things so that you are special and belong to an exclusive club. All I have to do to join your club, is pretend, and accept what you say as the truth.
I thought you said you were Catholic?
I am. Not everyone goes do heaven. Only those who know and accept love.
So what happens to those that don't go to heaven?
Why is heaven reserved for only those that "God" preselects?
What answer? I agree, you continue to not answer my questions. Why are you responding if you're not going to answer my questions?
Why doesn't the parent just create the cookies after dinner instead of toying with the "souls" of the children? Cookies are not created, they are bought you made a misstep there hehe. They bought it with everything else (dinner included). And I added the Idea that the cookies could have been created at the same time dinner was.
Okay so you agree with me that it is illogical for "God" to create things one way, then set the rules in opposition only to not allow those that broke the rules into heaven.
2ND EDIT: Why is it okay for the parents to trick the children into thinking one thing, then tell them another thing just to not welcome those children into heaven?
Why would loving parents play such a cruel game with their children?
Why are you responding if you're not going to answer my questions? I hope that the comments above will remove your feeling of not being answered.
You are giving me non-answers in order for you to avoid having to actually answer the questions.