|Publication number||US6633862 B2|
|Application number||US 09/751,052|
|Publication date||Oct 14, 2003|
|Filing date||Dec 29, 2000|
|Priority date||Dec 29, 2000|
|Also published as||US20020087504|
|Publication number||09751052, 751052, US 6633862 B2, US 6633862B2, US-B2-6633862, US6633862 B2, US6633862B2|
|Inventors||Blake A. Thompson|
|Original Assignee||Intel Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (23), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (33), Classifications (10), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of computer programming. More particularly, the invention relates to a system and method for synchronizing data sharing across multiple interpreted code engines (e.g., Java virtual machines) and/or applications.
2. Description of the Related Art
Java is an object-oriented programming language used to create computer programs which are platform-independent. That is, the same Java object code may be used on numerous different operating systems including Windows 95, Unix, Solaris, and Macintosh; and processors such as Intel® Pentium®-class processors, MIPS processors and AMD Athlon® processors, to name a few. This interoperability makes Java an ideal choice for programming Internet applications.
Once a program is written in Java source code, the Java compiler generates object code in the form of a Java application or applet. Technically, an “applet” is an application configured specifically to run within a Web browser such as Internet Explorer® or Netscape Navigator® (e.g., embedded in-line as objects within Hypertext Markup Language (“HTML”) documents). As illustrated in FIG. 1, Java applets and applications 100 are executed by a runtime interpreter residing on the client computer 130 commonly referred to as a Java “virtual machine” 110. The Java virtual machine 110 interprets the platform-independent program code from the application or applet 100 into code which the native client microprocessor 120 can execute (e.g., x86 instructions in the case of a Pentium®-class processor).
More than one virtual machine and/or Java application/applet may be concurrently executed on a client. One limitation of prior systems, however, is that no built in mechanism exists for sharing data between two or more virtual machines and/or Java applications. Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method for sharing data between multiple virtual machines and/or applications. What is also needed is a system and method for caching data and maintaining data coherency when data is shared between virtual machines and/or applications.
A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained from the following detailed description in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates a prior art Java virtual machine for interpreting code during runtime.
FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a caching system implemented within a Java virtual machine.
FIG. 3 illustrates two virtual machines caching data from the same database.
FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the invention for maintaining cache coherency using timestamps.
FIG. 5 illustrates a method implemented in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 6 illustrates cache synchronization using timestamps according to one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 7 illustrates cache synchronization using timestamps according to one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary computer system on which embodiments of the invention may be implemented.
In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form to avoid obscuring the underlying principles of the invention.
As illustrated in FIG. 2, one embodiment of the invention is comprised of a data interface module, referred to herein as a data abstraction layer or “DAL” 210, which allows the Java virtual machine 130 to communicate with and store data (e.g., object-oriented data) within a relational database 240. For example, the DAL 210 may include routines (e.g., method calls) which are invoked by the virtual machine 130 to store data, run database queries and retrieve data from the database 240. Moreover, as described in greater detail below, other virtual machines and applications may concurrently access the database 240 via the data abstraction layer 240 (see FIGS. 3-4 and 6-7).
In one embodiment, the data abstraction layer 210 includes a cache 200 to store data, thereby providing applications/applets 100 with faster access to the data and reducing strain on the database 240 (e.g., by reducing the number of database reads/writes). In one embodiment, the cache 200 stores the most frequently requested data. However, various other caching techniques and/or algorithms may be employed while still complying with the underlying principles of the invention (e.g., a least-recently used cache replacement policy may be implemented for replacing the contents of the cache). Moreover, variables such as the size of the requested data and whether the data is marked as non-cacheable may also be factored into the caching determination.
Moreover, various types of data may be stored in the cache 200. For example, in one embodiment, the cache 200 is used to store metadata which describes the database's 240's structure, attributes, processing or database changes (e.g., the metadata may comprise an index of data stored in the database). It should be noted, however, that various other types of database data may be stored in the cache 200 consistent with the underlying principles of the invention.
As mentioned briefly above, in one embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, two or more virtual machines 130, 330 and/or Java applications 100, 101 may concurrently access the database 240. Java virtual machines 130, 330 typically separate each application's memory space from all other applications. Accordingly, when two applications 100, 101 use the data abstraction layer 210, 310 as illustrated in FIG. 3, two separate and distinct instances of the cache 200, 300 may concurrently store and modify the same data. As a result, it is necessary to take steps to ensure that the data stored in the caches 200, 300 remains synchronized.
In order to do so, in one embodiment of the invention, illustrated in FIG. 4, a “current timestamp” variable is updated in the caches 200, 300, indicating when the data was loaded into each cache or when the data was last modified. In addition, a current timestamp variable is associated with the database 240, indicating the time that data in either of the caches 200, 300 was modified. In operation, if an application 100 modifies its cache 200 it also modifies the database 140 data and updates the timestamp in the database 240 to indicate that the data was modified. When another application 101 invokes its own cache 300 (e.g., calls a method of the cache 300 object), it performs a lookup of the database 240 timestamp and compares its own timestamp with the database 240 timestamp. If the database 240 timestamp is newer, it then reloads it's own cache 300 from the database 240.
In one embodiment, reloading the cache 300 is accomplished in the following manner. First, the application 101 and/or the virtual machine 330 disallows access to the cache 300. In one embodiment, this is accomplished simply by toggling a Boolean variable (e.g., 1=cache access denied, 0=cache access permitted). However, various other techniques may be employed to deny access to the cache 300 while still complying with the underlying principles of the invention. In addition, the application 101 and/or the virtual machine 330 waits until all functions/methods which called into the cache 300 prior to detection of the cache reload requirement to finish processing. In one embodiment of the invention, this is accomplished via an access count variable that is incremented when each method of the cache 300 is called, and decremented when each method of the cache 300 completes (e.g., when the access count variable is zero, all method have completed). However, various other techniques may be employed to determine when all cache methods have terminated consistent with the underlying principles of the invention.
Once it is determined that the access count variable is zero (e.g., once the cache object determines that all functions called prior to dirty cache detection have completed) the cache is reloaded. In one embodiment, the entire contents of the cache are dumped and a fresh set of data are reloaded from the database. The timestamp associated with the cache 300 is then set to be the same as the database 140 timestamp. In this manner, cached data will remain consistent across multiple applications 100, 101 and/or virtual machines 130, 330.
One embodiment of a method for synchronizing data across multiple virtual machines and/or applications is set forth in FIG. 5. At 500 an application attempts to access/modify data in its cache and as a result, at 502, the timestamp in the database is compared with the cache timestamp. If the two timestamps are equal (determined at 504), then the cache is not out of date and, at 506, the application is permitted to access/modify the data in the cache. At 508, the data and timestamp in the database is also updated to reflect the changes in the underlying data and the time that the changes were made.
If, however, the database timestamp and the cache timestamp are not equal, then the cache is out of date or “dirty” as indicated in FIG. 6, and must be reloaded (e.g., in FIG. 6 the timestamp of 12:00 is earlier than the database timestamp of 12:05). As a result, at 510, access to the cache is denied. At 512 it is determined whether all functions called prior to the dirty cache detection have completed. If not, then the method loops through 514 and 512 until all functions have completed. Once all functions have completed, at 516, the contents of the cache are dumped and the cache is reloaded. Finally, at 518 the timestamp is set to the same time as the timestamp in the database, resulting in synchronized caches as illustrated in FIG. 7.
An exemplary computer system 800 representing clients and/or servers on which features of the invention may be performed will now be described with reference to FIG. 8. The computer system 800 comprises a system bus 820 for communicating information, and a processor 810 coupled to bus 820 for processing information. Computer system 800 further comprises a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device 825 (referred to herein as main memory), coupled to bus 820 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 810. Main memory 825 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by processor 810. Computer system 800 also may include a read only memory (ROM) and/or other static storage device 826 coupled to bus 820 for storing static information and instructions used by processor 810.
A data storage device 827 such as a magnetic disk or optical disc and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer system 800 for storing information and instructions (e.g., Java applications/applets and virtual machine code). The computer system 800 can also be coupled to a second I/O bus 850 via an I/O interface 8230. A plurality of I/O devices may be coupled to I/O bus 850, including a display device 843, an input device (e.g., an alphanumeric input device 842 and/or a cursor control device 841).
The communication device 840 is used for accessing other computers (servers or clients) via a network, and uploading/downloading various types of data (e.g., Java applications/applets). The communication device 840 may comprise a modem, a network interface card, or other well known interface device, such as those used for coupling to Ethernet, token ring, or other types of networks.
Other embodiments of the invention may be implemented on cellular phones and pagers (e.g., in which the necessary transaction software is embedded in a microchip), handheld computing devices (e.g., personal digital assistants), and/or touch-tone telephones. It should be noted, however, that the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular type of communication device or communication medium.
Embodiments of the invention may include various steps, which have been described above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which may be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform the steps. Alternatively, these steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
Elements of the present invention may also be provided as a computer program product which may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic device) to perform a process. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards, propagation media or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, the present invention may be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).
Throughout this detailed description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details were set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. For example, while the embodiments described above focus on a Java virtual machine implementation, it will be appreciated that elements of the invention may be implemented in virtually any data sharing environment (e.g., the invention may be implemented with non-Java interpreted code engines). In certain instances, well known structures and functions were not described in elaborate detail in order to avoid obscuring the subject matter of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope and spirit of the invention should be judged in terms of the claims which follow.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4523206 *||Mar 3, 1982||Jun 11, 1985||Sperry Corporation||Cache/disk system with writeback regulation relative to use of cache memory|
|US4530054 *||Mar 3, 1982||Jul 16, 1985||Sperry Corporation||Processor-addressable timestamp for indicating oldest written-to cache entry not copied back to bulk memory|
|US4714992 *||Nov 26, 1985||Dec 22, 1987||International Business Machines Corporation||Communication for version management in a distributed information service|
|US4823310 *||Aug 10, 1987||Apr 18, 1989||Wang Laboratories, Inc.||Device for enabling concurrent access of indexed sequential data files|
|US5293627 *||May 22, 1991||Mar 8, 1994||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Method for adjusting curent clock counts in a distributed computer system|
|US5651113 *||Apr 25, 1996||Jul 22, 1997||Amdahl Corporation||Method and apparatus for indicating a time-out by generating a time stamp for an input/output (I/O) channel whenever the channel processes an instruction|
|US5701480 *||Apr 14, 1993||Dec 23, 1997||Digital Equipment Corporation||Distributed multi-version commitment ordering protocols for guaranteeing serializability during transaction processing|
|US5799322 *||Jan 30, 1997||Aug 25, 1998||Tandem Computer, Inc.||System and method for stopping updates at a specified timestamp in a remote duplicate database facility|
|US5799323 *||Jan 30, 1997||Aug 25, 1998||Tandem Computers, Inc.||Remote duplicate databased facility with triple contingency protection|
|US5881229 *||Apr 26, 1996||Mar 9, 1999||Shiva Corporation||Method and product for enchancing performance of computer networks including shared storage objects|
|US5897634 *||May 9, 1997||Apr 27, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Optimized caching of SQL data in an object server system|
|US5924096 *||Oct 15, 1997||Jul 13, 1999||Novell, Inc.||Distributed database using indexed into tags to tracks events according to type, update cache, create virtual update log on demand|
|US5987506 *||May 2, 1997||Nov 16, 1999||Mangosoft Corporation||Remote access and geographically distributed computers in a globally addressable storage environment|
|US6170063 *||Mar 7, 1998||Jan 2, 2001||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method for performing atomic, concurrent read and write operations on multiple storage devices|
|US6209090 *||May 29, 1997||Mar 27, 2001||Sol Aisenberg||Method and apparatus for providing secure time stamps for documents and computer files|
|US6247149 *||Oct 28, 1997||Jun 12, 2001||Novell, Inc.||Distributed diagnostic logging system|
|US6285997 *||Nov 16, 1998||Sep 4, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Query optimization with deferred update and autonomous sources|
|US6295541 *||Aug 18, 1998||Sep 25, 2001||Starfish Software, Inc.||System and methods for synchronizing two or more datasets|
|US6327574 *||Feb 1, 1999||Dec 4, 2001||Encirq Corporation||Hierarchical models of consumer attributes for targeting content in a privacy-preserving manner|
|US6418455 *||Oct 17, 2000||Jul 9, 2002||Claritech Corporation||System for modifying a database using a transaction log|
|US6449291 *||Nov 24, 1998||Sep 10, 2002||3Com Corporation||Method and apparatus for time synchronization in a communication system|
|US6539340 *||Dec 10, 1999||Mar 25, 2003||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for measuring resource usage within a computer system|
|WO1997021177A1 *||Dec 2, 1996||Jun 12, 1997||British Telecommunications Public Limited Company||Database access|
|1||*||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin "Copying Large Data Objects With Directory Attributes", May 1993, vol. 36, No. 5, p. 65-68.</STEXT>|
|2||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin "Shawdow Page Mechanism", Jun. 1986, vol. 29, No. 1, p. 340-342.* </STEXT>|
|3||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin "Solving Time of Day problems when using DB2 Timstamp in Optimistic Lock Implementation", Jul. 1992, vol. 35, No. 2, p. 420-422.* </STEXT>|
|4||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin "Copying Large Data Objects With Directory Attributes", May 1993, vol. 36, No. 5, p. 65-68.|
|5||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin "Shawdow Page Mechanism", Jun. 1986, vol. 29, No. 1, p. 340-342.*|
|6||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin "Solving Time of Day problems when using DB2 Timstamp in Optimistic Lock Implementation", Jul. 1992, vol. 35, No. 2, p. 420-422.*|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6769048 *||Dec 6, 2001||Jul 27, 2004||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Cache synchronization method, system and apparatus for a distributed application and an object located in a client cache|
|US7146613 *||May 29, 2002||Dec 5, 2006||Texas Instruments Incorporated||JAVA DSP acceleration by byte-code optimization|
|US7213038 *||Jul 29, 2004||May 1, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Data synchronization between distributed computers|
|US7386676 *||Jan 21, 2005||Jun 10, 2008||International Buiness Machines Coporation||Data coherence system|
|US7421562||Jul 6, 2004||Sep 2, 2008||Sybase, Inc.||Database system providing methodology for extended memory support|
|US7500064 *||Dec 3, 2007||Mar 3, 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Data coherence system|
|US7765185||May 17, 2004||Jul 27, 2010||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||Enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise|
|US7788243||Feb 15, 2007||Aug 31, 2010||Sybase, Inc.||System and methods for optimizing data transfer among various resources in a distributed environment|
|US7831772||Nov 9, 2010||Sybase, Inc.||System and methodology providing multiple heterogeneous buffer caches|
|US7836096||Nov 16, 2010||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system using date/time mutation to return data to Java applications|
|US7979549 *||Jul 12, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Network supporting centralized management of QoS policies|
|US8019945||Jan 30, 2009||Sep 13, 2011||Oracle International Corporation||System and method for transactional cache|
|US8612937||Aug 25, 2011||Dec 17, 2013||International Business Corporation||Synchronously debugging a software program using a plurality of virtual machines|
|US8700855||Nov 26, 2012||Apr 15, 2014||Oracle International Corporation||System and method for supporting a tiered cache|
|US9037535||May 12, 2014||May 19, 2015||Jda Software Group, Inc.||System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise|
|US20030028577 *||Apr 30, 2001||Feb 6, 2003||Chia-Chu Dorland||HTTP distributed XML-based automated event polling for network and E-service management|
|US20030101208 *||May 29, 2002||May 29, 2003||Gerard Chauvel||JAVA DSP acceleration by byte-code optimization|
|US20030110358 *||Dec 6, 2001||Jun 12, 2003||Goldberg Robert N.||Efficient automatic means for ensuring data cache coherency|
|US20040215655 *||May 17, 2004||Oct 28, 2004||Vasudev Rangadass||Enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise|
|US20050080796 *||Jul 29, 2004||Apr 14, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Data synchronization between distributed computers|
|US20050193160 *||Jul 6, 2004||Sep 1, 2005||Sybase, Inc.||Database System Providing Methodology for Extended Memory Support|
|US20060168402 *||Jan 21, 2005||Jul 27, 2006||Ahmad Said A||Data coherence system|
|US20070124433 *||Nov 30, 2005||May 31, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Network supporting centralized management of QoS policies|
|US20070124485 *||Nov 30, 2005||May 31, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Computer system implementing quality of service policy|
|US20080052310 *||Oct 29, 2007||Feb 28, 2008||Vasudev Rangadass||Enterprise Solution Framework Incorporating a Master Data Management System for Centrally Managing Core Reference Data Associated with an Enterprise|
|US20080065644 *||Feb 15, 2007||Mar 13, 2008||Sybase, Inc.||System and Methods For Optimizing Data Transfer Among Various Resources In A Distributed Environment|
|US20080082757 *||Dec 3, 2007||Apr 3, 2008||Ahmad Said A||Data Coherence System|
|US20080140937 *||Dec 12, 2006||Jun 12, 2008||Sybase, Inc.||System and Methodology Providing Multiple Heterogeneous Buffer Caches|
|US20080147594 *||Dec 14, 2006||Jun 19, 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system using date/time mutation to return data to java applications|
|US20090198899 *||Jan 30, 2009||Aug 6, 2009||Bea Systems, Inc.||System and method for transactional cache|
|US20100306234 *||Dec 2, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Cache synchronization|
|CN101321189B||Jun 6, 2008||Aug 24, 2011||国际商业机器公司||Stochastic control optimization for sender-flux control|
|CN103488581B *||Sep 4, 2013||Jan 13, 2016||用友网络科技股份有限公司||数据缓存系统和数据缓存方法|
|U.S. Classification||707/610, 707/E17.007, 707/781, 707/999.001, 707/758, 707/999.2|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S707/99931, G06F17/30008|
|Apr 4, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTEL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THOMPSON, BLAKE A.;REEL/FRAME:011673/0680
Effective date: 20010321
|Jul 27, 2004||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Apr 13, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 7, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 1, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12