|Publication number||US4773731 A|
|Application number||US 07/090,487|
|Publication date||Sep 27, 1988|
|Filing date||Aug 28, 1987|
|Priority date||Aug 28, 1987|
|Also published as||DE3885210D1, DE3885210T2, EP0305009A2, EP0305009A3, EP0305009B1|
|Publication number||07090487, 090487, US 4773731 A, US 4773731A, US-A-4773731, US4773731 A, US4773731A|
|Inventors||Jill F. Goldenberg, Ralph H. Bradley, Jr., William F. Guerinot, Thomas S. McKechnie|
|Original Assignee||North American Philips Corp.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (75), Classifications (4), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates generally to projection screens. More specifically, the present invention relates to rear projection screens capable of use in a projection television (PTV) display arrangement.
Typical PTV display arrangements contain means for converting a video signal into an optical image. The optical image is projected upon a screen for viewing by an observer. In the case where the projection distance is relatively small, such as in compact PTV systems, the prior art arrangements are deficient.
Some prior art arrangements have an inherent lower optical efficiency near the outer edges of the screen or corner illumination problems, resulting in a "bright spot" in the center. Efficiency may be defined to be the ratio of the total amount of light which passes through the screen to the total amount of incident light received by the screen. Other prior art arrangements have attempted to improve the quality of the system by eliminating the bright spot effect. While these arrangements may have eliminated corner illumination problems, the overall efficiency of the screen and the contrast are reduced. Additionally, undesirable artifacts may be visible to the observer.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an efficient projection screen without corner illumination deficiencies.
Another object of this invention is to provide a projection screen with improved overall efficiency and contrast.
A further object of this invention is to provide a projection screen which displays an image free of artifacts.
Yet another object of this invention is to provide a projection screen that achieves all of the above objects in a simple embodiment.
The foregoing and other objects of the present invention are realized by forming a one-piece projection screen which splits the optical power of the screen's field lens between more than one surface, each surface acting as a Fresnel lens. The index of refraction of the material between the surfaces (two in the preferred embodiment) is different from that of the mediums either upstream of the first surface, or downstream of the second surface.
The foregoing and other objects and features of the present invention will be apparent from the specification, the drawings and the two combined. The drawings (not drawn to scale) are briefly:
FIG. 1 is a horizontal cross-sectional representation of a one-piece projection screen having a single Fresnel lens.
FIG. 2 is a horizontal cross-sectional representation of a two-piece projection screen.
FIG. 3 is a horizontal cross-sectional representation of the preferred embodiment of the one-piece projection screen of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a geometry for the field lens of the projection screen in FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is an expanded view of a portion of FIG. 4.
FIG. 1 shows a projection screen 100 usable in, for example, a PTV system. The field lens 102 in the screen 100 may have a short focal length--typical of projection screens used in compact PTV systems. Light comprising the image to be displayed emanates from a projection lens or image source 101. The light rays from source 101 are converted to parallel rays by a Fresnel lens also serving as the field lens 102 which has facets 103. The screen 100 may additionally contain a screen base 115 having a diffuser 108 with diffuser elements 110 which controls the spread of the light in the vertical direction to a cone angle of 11°, for example, and a lenticular array 112 containing lenticules 114 that permits efficient wide-angle viewing (a horizontal cone angle of 170° for example). The facets 103 refract light received to form the parallel or collimated rays that impinge upon the diffuser and lenticules.
While the facet surfaces 104 are primarily responsible for refraction in the Fresnel lens 102, the facet surfaces 106 primarily cause a loss of efficiency of the screen 100 because light impinging on these surfaces is misdirected or lost. As can be seen from FIG. 1, the facets 103 located at the perimeter of the Fresnel lens 102 have larger surfaces than the facets 103 towards the center. This is a necessary limitation since the amount of refraction required to convert divergent rays from a point source of light into parallel rays at a given location on the Fresnel lens is directly proportional to the distance from the center of the lens to the given location.
Because the facet surfaces 106 are larger near the edges of the lens 102, a greater portion of light is misdirected, resulting in decreased luminance near the edges, thus giving the lens a "bright spot" effect in its center.
The projection screen 200 in FIG. 2 eliminates the edge luminance reduction problems of the projection screen 100 in FIG. 1 by a separation of its field lens 202, which contains a Fresnel lens 204, from the remainder of the screen. The Fresnel lens 204 converts the rays from the light source into parallel rays just as the Fresnel lens 102. However, the incidents of misdirected light are greatly reduced, so that no "bright spot" appears at the center. Two of the penalties associated with the embodiment of FIG. 2--and hence the drawbacks--are an approximate 16% reduction in the screen's efficiency, and the introduction of disturbing artifacts.
The projection screen 300 shown in FIG. 3 greatly reduces the edge luminance fall-off problem associated with the screen 100, while avoiding the large efficiency loss penalty associated with the screen 200 and the number of disturbing artifacts. The field lens 308 contains two Fresnel lenses 302 and 310 separated by a region or medium with an index of refraction different from that of either the diffuser 316 or the incident medium 301. The region 309 is for example filled with U.V. curing polymer having an index of refraction n of approximately 1.59. The diffuser 316 may be of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) material with n approximately equal to 1.49.
The addition of the second Fresnel lens 310 has the effect of dividing the required optical power of the field lens 308 between the two Fresnel lenses. Thus, the facet surfaces 306 and 314 are smaller than corresponding facet surfaces in FIG. 1, resulting in less misdirected light.
The facet angles of the two Fresnel lenses 302 and 310 can be calculated as follows, with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5. In the preferred embodiment the optical power of the field lens 308 is evenly divided between surfaces 302 and 310, and the distance across the region 309 between the surfaces 302 and 310 is small. Therefore the optical power of each surface is 1/2 f, where f is the focal length of the field lens 308. The facet angle α on surface 302 is given by the following equation ##EQU1## h being the distance from the optical center of the lens 308 to the facet, and n1, being the refractive index of region 309. A ray incident on facet surface 304 makes an angle θ1, with the normal, such that
The angle of the refracted ray θ1 ' is found by using Snell's Law: ##EQU2##
The angle of the refracted ray measured with respect to the optical axis θ2, is given by
θ2 =θ1 '-α (4)
The angle of this ray with respect to normal of facet surface 312 is
where the facet angle β is the angle needed to collimate the ray. Snell's Law predicts the refraction angle ω' as ##EQU3## where n2 is the refractive index for the region 316. To collimate the ray after refraction, ω"-β must equal zero. Therefore, ##EQU4## The facet angle β of facet surface 312 is calculated by a rearrangement of Equation (7). Thus, ##EQU5##
Using the above equations and the necessary data, facet angles for a two Fresnel lens, one-piece projection screen can be readily calculated. For example, if the focal length of the field lens is 39 inches, the diameter of the screen is 37 inches and n1 and n2 are 1.59 (for Polystyrene) and 1.49 (for PMMA) respectively, facet surface 304 will have an angle α of approximately 20° and facet surface 312 will have an angle β of approximately 62°.
Only about half of the light rays impinging upon the outermost facet surface 106 of the projection screen 100, impinge upon the corresponding facet surface 306 of the projection screen 300, thus greatly reducing the outer edge illumination problems. The efficiency of the screen 300 exceeds that of screen 200 by approximately 8%.
Various modifications of the above-described invention will be apparent to those skilled in the pertinent art, and are intended to be within the scope of the present invention. For example, the projection screen embodying the present invention need not be limited to use in a PTV system, but may be used with other projection systems. Also, the optical power of the field lens need not be divided equally between the two surfaces, and may be divided between more than two surfaces with any desired ratio. Additionally, the optical power of the field lens need not be chosen to collimate the rays from the projection lens.
The composition of the Fresnel lens is not limited to a particular material, and, rather than utilizing rotationally symmetrical Fresnel lenses, the present invention may utilize a field lens comprising cylindrical Fresnel lenses. Also, the present invention is functional even where the optical center of the Fresnel lens is vertically offset from the optical axis of the PTV display arrangement.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4053208 *||Feb 3, 1976||Oct 11, 1977||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Rear projection screens|
|US4679900 *||Jun 5, 1986||Jul 14, 1987||North American Philips Corporation||Bulk diffuser for a projection television screen|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4961642 *||Jun 30, 1989||Oct 9, 1990||Hitachi, Ltd.||Projection type display device for monitoring at short distance|
|US5005945 *||Jul 19, 1990||Apr 9, 1991||U.S. Philips Corporation||Rear projection screen and rear projection system comprising such a screen|
|US5083199 *||Jun 18, 1990||Jan 21, 1992||Heinrich-Hertz-Institut For Nachrichtentechnik Berlin Gmbh||Autostereoscopic viewing device for creating three-dimensional perception of images|
|US5186780 *||Nov 27, 1989||Feb 16, 1993||Mitsubishi Rayon Co.||Method of manufacturing transmission type screen|
|US5457572 *||Dec 17, 1993||Oct 10, 1995||Kuraray Co., Ltd.||Rear-projection screen|
|US5803567 *||Oct 18, 1996||Sep 8, 1998||Sony Corporation||Protection-type display device|
|US6163402 *||Jun 11, 1998||Dec 19, 2000||3M Innovative Properties Company||Rear projection screen|
|US6449089||Mar 23, 1999||Sep 10, 2002||3M Innovative Properties Company||Rear projection screen with enhanced contrast|
|US6483612 *||Apr 5, 2000||Nov 19, 2002||Duke University||Projection screen apparatus including holographic optical element|
|US6515798||Jun 29, 2000||Feb 4, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Company||Rear projection screen|
|US6710919||Sep 29, 2000||Mar 23, 2004||Scan Vision Screen Aps||Translucent screen comprising a lens system|
|US6710941 *||Jun 5, 2002||Mar 23, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fresnel lens for projection screens|
|US6768566||Apr 15, 2002||Jul 27, 2004||Duke University||Projection screen apparatus including holographic optical element|
|US6788460||Apr 12, 2002||Sep 7, 2004||Duke University||Projection screen apparatus|
|US6816306||Jun 3, 2003||Nov 9, 2004||Bright View Technologies Inc.||Micro-lens array based light transmitting screen with high resolution and low imaging artifacts|
|US6819486||Jan 17, 2001||Nov 16, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Projection screen having elongated structures|
|US6829087||Jun 3, 2003||Dec 7, 2004||Bright View Technologies, Inc.||Micro-lens array based light transmitting screen with tunable gain|
|US6917469 *||Jun 24, 2004||Jul 12, 2005||Japan Acryace Co., Ltd.||Light diffusing laminated plate|
|US6940643||Sep 3, 2004||Sep 6, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Projection screen having elongated structures|
|US6967779||Jun 3, 2003||Nov 22, 2005||Bright View Technologies, Inc.||Micro-lens array with precisely aligned aperture mask and methods of producing same|
|US6970296 *||Nov 12, 2002||Nov 29, 2005||Osram Gmbh||Signaling device for traffic signals|
|US7061677 *||Jul 14, 2004||Jun 13, 2006||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Screen for projection display in which the light is uniformly transmitted throughout the screen|
|US7080910||Aug 19, 2003||Jul 25, 2006||Infocus Corporation||Method and system for a thermal architecture and user adjustable keystone in a display device|
|US7088507 *||Oct 23, 2003||Aug 8, 2006||Infocus Corporation||Rear projection display|
|US7102820||Jan 6, 2004||Sep 5, 2006||Infocus Corporation||Flat valley fresnel lens for a display device|
|US7150537||Jan 6, 2004||Dec 19, 2006||Infocus Corporation||Projection television device and screen|
|US7175287||Apr 15, 2004||Feb 13, 2007||Infocus Corporation||Wide angle projection lens|
|US7253954||Jul 12, 2006||Aug 7, 2007||Infocus Corporation||Flat valley fresnel lens|
|US7277227 *||Sep 24, 2003||Oct 2, 2007||Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.||Fresnel lens sheet, transmission screen provided with the same and rear projection display|
|US7331678||May 15, 2006||Feb 19, 2008||Infocus Corporation||Method and system for a thermal architecture and user adjustable keystone in a display device|
|US7341353||Jan 6, 2004||Mar 11, 2008||Infocus Corporation||Variable fresnel screen for use in projection device|
|US7405857||Sep 2, 2005||Jul 29, 2008||3M Innovative Properties Company||Light emitting diode (LED) device and method of making same|
|US7453636 *||Sep 13, 2005||Nov 18, 2008||Fusion Optix Inc.||High contrast optical path corrected screen|
|US7545586||Nov 15, 2005||Jun 9, 2009||Infocus Corporation||Wide angle lens system having a distorted intermediate image|
|US7567380||May 24, 2005||Jul 28, 2009||Infocus Corporation||Rear projection display device having multiple mirrors that are substantially parallel to a screen|
|US7777949||Aug 17, 2010||Seiko Epson Corporation||Laminate screen for a display device|
|US8081377||Dec 20, 2011||Infocus Corporation||Wide angle lens system having a distorted intermediate image|
|US8830577 *||May 11, 2012||Sep 9, 2014||Prysm, Inc.||Rollable display screen|
|US9217912||Dec 15, 2006||Dec 22, 2015||Seiko Epson Corporation||Projection television device and screen|
|US9291887||Mar 6, 2015||Mar 22, 2016||Prysm, Inc.||Rollable display screen quilt|
|US20020096859 *||Jan 22, 2001||Jul 25, 2002||Versaw Douglas W.||Motorcycle trailer hitch|
|US20030076237 *||Nov 12, 2002||Apr 24, 2003||Simon Blumel||Signaling device for traffic signals|
|US20030206342 *||Jun 3, 2003||Nov 6, 2003||Bright View Technologies, Inc.||Micro-lens array based light transmission screen|
|US20030210462 *||Jun 3, 2003||Nov 13, 2003||Bright View Technologies, Inc.||Micro-lens array based light transmitting screen with tunable gain|
|US20040008411 *||Jun 3, 2003||Jan 15, 2004||Bright View Technologies, Inc.||Micro-lens array based light transmitting screen with high resolution and low imaging artifacts|
|US20040017612 *||Jun 3, 2003||Jan 29, 2004||Bright View Technologies, Inc.||Micro-lens array with precisely aligned aperture mask and methods of producing same|
|US20040188875 *||Apr 14, 2004||Sep 30, 2004||Knox Richard M.||Methods of forming localized positive optical power units a substrate|
|US20040218268 *||Oct 23, 2003||Nov 4, 2004||Peterson Mark D.||Rear projection display|
|US20040227990 *||Jan 6, 2004||Nov 18, 2004||Peterson Mark D.||Variable fresnel screen for use in projection device|
|US20040233394 *||Apr 15, 2004||Nov 25, 2004||Gohman Jeffrey A.||Wide angle projection lens|
|US20040257539 *||Jan 6, 2004||Dec 23, 2004||Peterson Mark D.||Projection television device and screen|
|US20040263966 *||Jun 24, 2004||Dec 30, 2004||Japan Acryace Co., Ltd.||Light diffusing laminated plate|
|US20050036199 *||Sep 3, 2004||Feb 17, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Projection screen having elongated structures|
|US20050057805 *||Jul 14, 2004||Mar 17, 2005||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Screen for projection display|
|US20050180004 *||Sep 24, 2003||Aug 18, 2005||Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.||Fresnel lens sheet, transmission screen using this and rear transmission display unit|
|US20050275811 *||May 24, 2005||Dec 15, 2005||Peterson Mark D||Rear projection display device having multiple mirrors that are substantially parallel to a screen|
|US20050286124 *||Sep 2, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Light emitting diode (LED) device and method of making same|
|US20060028623 *||Aug 19, 2003||Feb 9, 2006||Engle Timothy S||Method and system for a thermal architecture and user adjustable keystone in a display device|
|US20060066945 *||Sep 13, 2005||Mar 30, 2006||Yeo Terence E||High contrast optical path corrected screen|
|US20060203334 *||May 15, 2006||Sep 14, 2006||Infocus Corporation||Method and system for a thermal architecture and user adjustable keystone in a display device|
|US20060245055 *||Jul 12, 2006||Nov 2, 2006||Infocus Corporation||Flat valley fresnel lens|
|US20070014005 *||Aug 7, 2006||Jan 18, 2007||Infocus Corporation||Laminate screen for a display device|
|US20070146652 *||Dec 15, 2006||Jun 28, 2007||Infocus Corporation||Projection television device and screen|
|US20080130106 *||Nov 15, 2005||Jun 5, 2008||Infocus Corporation||Wide angle lens system having a distorted intermediate image|
|US20090244701 *||Jun 8, 2009||Oct 1, 2009||Infocus Corporation||Wide Angle Lens System Having a Distorted Intermediate Image|
|US20120287502 *||May 11, 2012||Nov 15, 2012||Hajjar Roger A||Rollable display screen|
|EP0371432A2 *||Nov 27, 1989||Jun 6, 1990||Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.||Transmission type screen and method of manufacturing the same|
|EP1879069A1||Feb 13, 2006||Jan 16, 2008||K Laser Technology, Inc.||Rear projection screen with spatial varying diffusing angle|
|WO1997004352A1 *||Jul 15, 1996||Feb 6, 1997||Philips Electronics N.V.||Front projection screen with lenticular front surface|
|WO1999034254A1 *||Nov 30, 1998||Jul 8, 1999||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||Rear projection screen|
|WO2001023957A2 *||Sep 29, 2000||Apr 5, 2001||Scan Vision Screen Aps||A translucent screen comprising a lens system and method for its manufacture|
|WO2001023957A3 *||Sep 29, 2000||Oct 10, 2002||Scan Vision Screen Aps||A translucent screen comprising a lens system and method for its manufacture|
|WO2003087927A2 *||Feb 20, 2003||Oct 23, 2003||Duke University||Projection screen apparatus|
|WO2003087927A3 *||Feb 20, 2003||Jun 24, 2004||Univ Duke||Projection screen apparatus|
|WO2005040912A1 *||Oct 22, 2004||May 6, 2005||Infocus Corporation||Rear projection display|
|Feb 29, 1988||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN PHILIPS CORPORATION 100 EAST 42ND S
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:GOLDENBERG, JILL F.;MCKECHNIE, THOMAS S.;REEL/FRAME:004853/0618
Effective date: 19870708
Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN PHILIPS CORPORATION, 100 EAST 42ND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:BRADLEY, RALPH H. JR.;GUERINOT, WILLIAM F.;REEL/FRAME:004853/0619
Effective date: 19870713
Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN PHILIPS CORPORATION, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GOLDENBERG, JILL F.;MCKECHNIE, THOMAS S.;REEL/FRAME:004853/0618
Effective date: 19870708
Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN PHILIPS CORPORATION, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BRADLEY, RALPH H. JR.;GUERINOT, WILLIAM F.;REEL/FRAME:004853/0619
Effective date: 19870713
|Mar 2, 1992||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 1, 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Feb 25, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12