|Publication number||US5388586 A|
|Application number||US 08/172,847|
|Publication date||14 Feb 1995|
|Filing date||23 Dec 1993|
|Priority date||23 Dec 1992|
|Also published as||DE69318689D1, DE69318689T2, EP0605264A1, EP0605264B1|
|Publication number||08172847, 172847, US 5388586 A, US 5388586A, US-A-5388586, US5388586 A, US5388586A|
|Inventors||Chik-Yam Lee, Laurent Claudon, Renzo D. Molin|
|Original Assignee||Ela Medical|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (124), Classifications (9), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention concerns implantable cardiac pacemakers, more specifically signal processing methods and apparatus for detecting intracardiac signals for controlling pacing operation and for monitoring the intracardiac electrocardiogram (ECG) externally.
Most cardiac pacemakers function according to the pacing mode that is inhibited: a stimulation pulse is delivered only if no spontaneous activity is detected during a period of sensing corresponding to the duration of a cardiac cycle (800 ms for a normal rhythm of 75 cpm). This mode of functioning allows an economy of energy, that is to say an increase of the longevity of the pacemaker.
An inhibited pacing mode also allows, from the physiological point of view, to avoid a competition between the spontaneous rhythm of the patient and the frequency of stimulation of the cardiac pacemaker. Competition is not avoided in an asynchronous pacing mode.
The cardiac activity, represented by a variation of cell potential of the myocardium, is sensed in a cardiac pacemaker by means of electrodes placed on the wall of the atrium and/or the ventricle, according to the type of the cardiac pacemaker (AAI, VVI, DDD).
Some problems linked to the sensing are due to the perturbation potentials created by the pacemaker itself. Indeed, stimulation pulses provoke important variations of the cell potential, in the stimulated cardiac chamber as well as in the non stimulated chamber. The sensing of a stimulation pulse in the cardiac chamber that is not stimulated is a particular problem during the ventricular sensing period following an atrial stimulation. Indeed, it is necessary to sense the ventricle as soon as possible after the stimulation so as to verify the good atrial-ventricular conduction.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to remedy the aforementioned problems, and provide for sensing signals corresponding to the cell potential that do not confuse a sensed signal deflection due to a stimulation with a sensed signal deflection due to a spontaneous event.
Another object of the invention is to provide an implantable cardiac pacemaker that uses the same electronic circuit for sensing the spontaneous cardiac activity and the transmission of the intracardiac ECG to the outside.
Another object of the invention is to provide an implantable cardiac pacemaker that faithfully senses a deflection due to a stimulation, so as to measure correctly the parameter of efficiency, or inefficiency, of the stimulation. The efficiency (or efficiency) measurement then can be used to operate an algorithm of adaptation of energy of the stimulation, i.e., adjust the stimulation energy.
Another object of the invention is to provide an implantable cardiac pacemaker that has an automatic adjustment of the signal sensitivity so as to take into account the evolution in time of the form of the sensed signal.
Another object of the invention is to anticipate an automatic adjustment of the period of blanking according to the importance of the diaphonie (cross-talk) following on the signal.
Broadly, the invention concerns an implantable cardiac pacemaker having a circuitry for sensing variations of potential generated by the spontaneous and stimulated cardiac activity, and which is susceptible to be used to transmit, by telemetry to the exterior, the intracardiac electrocardiogram (ECG).
One aspect of the present invention is directed to an apparatus for use in an implantable cardiac pacemaker in which a circuit for the acquisition and detection of the intracardial electronic activity comprises a passive filter, an amplifier, an analog to digital converter (preferably of the delta modulation type), a microprocessor, and an algorithm to insure the detection of spontaneous cardiac events. One such apparatus is characterized by:
(a) the filter being a band pass filter having a frequency pass range spreading from 0.1 to 80 Hz approximately;
(b) the amplifier having switched capacitors and presenting to the output a dynamic range of 0.8V approximately and a low gain that is lower than 50; and
(c) the analog-to-digital converter has a variable sampling frequency and a variable step magnitude (resolution).
The electronic signal acquisition and detection circuit has a large bandwidth, a low gain and a large dynamic range, which provides for the detection of spontaneous atrial and/or ventricular events, the measure of the efficiency parameter of the stimulation, and the transmission of an intracardial ECG by telemetry. The output of this circuit are digital values (digital signals) corresponding to the intracardial cardiac electrical activity of the patient. The terms "digital values" and "digital signals" are used interchangeably.
In other embodiments, the invention also includes an automatic adjustment of the period of blanking and/or an automatic adjustment of the sensitivity. These are preferably implemented by software processing of the obtained digital values. In addition, the analog-to-digital converter preferably functions at two sampling frequencies, one of approximately 1 kHz, the other of approximately 4 kHz.
Other aspects of the present invention include the following. The command of the frequency change and of the step change of the analog-to-digital converter is realized by comparison of the absolute value of the variation of amplitude of the processed digital signals that are sensed (i.e., detected, measured or monitored) during a duration of from 6 to 12 ms, preferably 9 ms, with a threshold called threshold of acceleration.
The detection of an atrial or ventricular spontaneous cardiac event is realized by a comparison of the absolute value of the variation of amplitude of the digital signals sensed during a duration of 6 to 12 ms, preferably 9 ms, with a threshold called threshold of detection.
The function of detection of a ventricular or atrial cardiac event is preferably realized by numerical processing of the digital signals with a dedicated microcontroller.
The sign of a variation of amplitude of the digital signals sensed during a duration of 6 to 12 ms, preferably 9 ms, before the end of the absolute refractory period (ARP), where the absolute value of the amplitude variation is greater than the threshold of detection, is memorized. The detection, after the ARP, of a spontaneous event is then indicated only if the absolute value of the variation of amplitude of the digital signals sensed during a duration of 6 to 12 ms, preferably 9 ms, is greater than the threshold of detection, and if the sign of this amplitude variation is of opposite sign to the sign memorized during the ARP.
The duration of the ventricular blanking interval is adjustable manually or automatically. In the case of an automatic adjustment, the duration of blanking is adjusted to each atrial stimulation according to the amplitude of the cross-talk. In the course of an automatic adjustment of the blanking interval, the end of the blanking interval is determined as follows. First, the sign of the amplitude variation of the digital signals sensed during a duration of from 6 to 12 ms is determined for each of a series of consecutive durations. The end of the blanking period is then determined to be the time when the sign between two consecutive durations first inverts.
The amplitude of the deflection of the ventricular signal following an atrial stimulation is measured at the end of the blanking period. The sign of this deflection is memorized. If the amplitude of this deflection is greater than the threshold of detection at the end of the blanking period, then the absolute value of the amplitude variation of the ventricular signal sensed during a duration of 6 to 12, preferably 9 ms, being greater than the threshold of detection, and the sign of the amplitude variation being identical to the memorized sign of the deflection will be considered alone as due to the presence of a ventricular event. In the contrary case, i.e., when the amplitude of deflection is less than the detection threshold, the detection of a ventricular event is realized based on the absolute amplitude variation criteria without the constraint of sign.
During an automatic sensitivity adjustment, a search of the absolute value of the maximal amplitude variation of the signal sensed during a duration of 6 to 12 ms, preferably 9 ms, begins on a detection of a spontaneous atrial and/or ventricular cardiac event, and extends a given period, preferably 48 ms. During an automatic adjustment of the sensitivity, an initial sensitivity is programmable by the physician. In the case of a cardiac stimulation, the programmed value is multiplied by a factor, preferably 1/0.375, and is used in place of the maximal amplitude variation memorized after a detection.
In one embodiment, during an automatic adjustment of the sensitivity, the new threshold of detection is selected as a certain percentage, preferably 37.5%, of the average of the last eight determined maximal values of the amplitude variation of the digital signal sensed during a duration, e.g., 9 ms, which are sensed for each spontaneous event.
Further features and advantages of the invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like elements, and in which:
FIG. 1 is a simplified circuit diagram of the electronic acquisition circuit of the cardiac activity in an implantable cardiac monitoring device according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of an embodiment of the passive filter of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of an embodiment of the amplifier of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a Bode plot diagram of Hz versus dB for a circuit of the filter of FIG. 2 and the amplifier of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram of an embodiment of the analog to digital converter with delta modulation of FIG. 1;
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a routine for cardiac detection implementable in the microcontroller of FIG. 1;
FIG. 7 is a diagram of the trapping of the signal at the end of absolute refractory period (ARP);
FIGS. 8A and 8B are respectively representative diagrams of a signal at the output of amplifier, that follows a cardiac stimulation, and of a signal at the output of the analog to digital converter, of the trapping at the end of ARP;
FIG. 9 is a flow chart of the signal processing at the end of ARP;
FIG. 10 is a flow chart of the signal processing of the constraint of sign according to the invention;
FIG. 11 is a representative diagram of a signal of cross-talk, followed by a spontaneous ventricular contraction;
FIG. 12 is a diagram of a blanking interval programmed to be less than a duration of 32 ms;
FIG. 13 is a diagram of a blanking interval programmed to be greater than a duration of 32 ms;
FIG. 14 is a diagram of an automatic blanking interval;
FIG. 15 is a flow chart for the test process for cross-talk;
FIG. 16 is a flow chart for the processing of the automatic blanking; and
FIG. 17 is a flow chart for the automatic adjustment of the sensitivity.
Referring to FIG. 1, the electronic circuit 30 for acquiring and detecting the cardiac signal includes a passive filter 1 having large bandwidth, an amplifier 2 with switched capacitors and low gain, an analog to digital a converter 3 with variable frequency and variable steps, a microcontroller 4 which performs the functions of detection and processing of the cardiac activity signal and allows for adapting to phenomenon due to stimulations and to the cross-talk, and measuring the amplitude of the event detected, and a microprocessor 5, which supervises the functioning of a cardiac monitoring device 100, such as a pacemaker coupled to the patient's heart 110 by intracardial leads 120, and insuring the automatic adjustment function of sensitivity.
In FIGS. 1-3, references 10a, 10b, 11a, 11b, and 12 to 16 designate the electrical connections or leads. Reference 14 also symbolizes the output of the electronic acquisition and detection circuit 30.
Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, a preferred circuit diagram of filter 1 is shown. Signals coming from intracardial leads 120 are provided to filter 1 at input leads 10a and 10b. The filtered signals are output at output leads 11a and 11b. The input 10a is preferably connected to the distal part of the intracardiac lead while the input 10b is connected is to the case of the pacemaker 100 during unipolar sensing and to the proximal part of the intracardiac lead 120 during a bipolar sensing. A switch 17a, 17b, which is commanded by a command signal BLANK, allows to isolate controllably the acquisition circuit in order notably to protect electronic components during the delivery of a stimulation impulse.
Referring to the filter circuit portion for input lead 10a, the low pole frequency of filter 1 is set by a capacitor CO and the resistance Req at the input of amplifier 2, preferably situated at about 0.1 Hz. A first high pole frequency is provided by a resistance R1 and a capacitor C1, preferably situated at about 80 Hz. A second high pole frequency is provided by a resistance R2 and a capacitor C2, preferably in the range of 3 kHz. The filter characteristics for the input lead 10b are the same as for lead 10a and are illustrated in FIG. 2 by the use of the same reference numerals having "primes".
The low frequency pole is selected to obtain two advantages. First, it does not alter stimulation signals, so that an accurate measure of the parameter of efficiency of stimulation can be obtained. Second, it does not alter low spontaneous signal frequency (extrasystoles ES, T-wave, etc . . . ) so that this acquisition circuit also can be used for sensing an intracardial electrocardiogram (ECG) for transmission out of the pacemaker (or cardiac monitoring device 100 (e.g., a pacemaker, cardioverter, or defibrilator or other implantable device), by telemetry circuit 130.
The high frequency pole of 80 Hz is selected because it corresponds to the highest frequency of sensed cardiac signals (atrial or "P" waves and/or ventricular or "R" waves). The second pole at 3 kHz is provided for protection against electromagnetic interference and to comply with appropriate safety standards, such as the European norm NF EN50 061, on the safety of the implantable cardiac pacemakers.
Referring to FIG. 3, a circuit diagram of amplifier 2 with switched capacitors is shown. The switched capacitor principle is used to reduce the number of external electronic components, by an integration of the former in an integrated circuit chip, so as to reduce the size of the electronic circuit in the implanted pacemaker. Amplifier 2 with switched capacitors comprises a differential amplifier 22, capacitors C3, C3', C4, C4' and C5, and switches 18a, 18b, 19a, 19b, 20 and 21. Switches 18a to 19b are commanded by a control signal signal Ph1 provided by a first clock source (not shown). Switches 20 and 21 are commanded by a control signal signal Ph2 provided by a second clock source (not shown).
The two distinct clock sources deliver signals Ph1 and Ph2 respectively, such that they are never active simultaneously, as represented on the upper right part of FIG. 3. During the active phase of signal Ph1 of the first clock source, switches 18a to 19b are closed and switches 20 and 21 are opened. As a result, capacitors C3 and C3' are each loaded to the voltage coming from filter 1, on leads 11a and 11b respectively and capacitors C4 and C4' are unloaded. At the end of the active phase of signal Ph1, switches 18a to 19b are opened and the charges on capacitors C3 and C3' distribute respectively between capacitors C3 and C4 on the one hand, and capacitors C3' and C4' on the other hand.
During the active phase of signal Ph2 of the second clock source, switches 20 and 21 are closed. As a result, the difference of voltage signals present on capacitors C3 and C3' is amplified by the differential amplifier 22 in the ratio C3/C4, and the result is stored on capacitor C5. The gain being realized by the ratio of the two capacities, it is possible to adjust this ratio so as to have, to the output, a maximal dynamic range.
The interest of a large dynamic range resides in the fact that the parameter of efficiency of stimulation can be more easily measured. Indeed, in accordance with the present invention, stimulation signals are not altered, neither by a filtering of the low frequencies by reason of the bandwidth of the filter 1, nor by a saturation of the amplifier 2 by reason of the choice of the amplifier gain. As examples, in case of an atrial cardiac lead, the gain can be fixed to 40 approximately, and in case of a ventricular lead, the gain can be fixed to 15 approximately. The differential gain of the totality of filter 1 and amplifier 2 is represented on FIG. 4.
FIG. 5 illustrates an analog to digital converter (ADC) 3 with delta modulation, comprising a comparator 24, a counter 23, and a digital to analog converter 25. According to the principle of delta modulation, the result of a measured difference (delta) is modulated based on the amplitude of the variation of the input signals. The main disadvantage of an ADC with delta modulation is that it is not able to follow correctly a signal presenting a rapid amplitude variation due to the fact that the digitization been made by increment or decrement of a step of the counter at each sampling. This problem is overcome by the present invention which provides that the sampling frequency and the step magnitude of ADC 3 can be modified as a function of variations of the signal sensed. Indeed, the signal detection algorithm, described in more detail below, responds to variations of amplitude of the signal coming from the cardiac lead. If the signal coming from the myocardium does not present variations, the analog to digital conversion is realized using a "basic" frequency of, for example, 1 kHz. On the other hand, when the base line of the signal presents variations, due, for example, to the presence of an event or a stimulation, the ADC functions to convert the signal using a more significant "accelerated" frequency, for example, 4 kHz. The higher frequency allows to follow correctly the sensed analog signal for conversion.
The ADC step also can be modified according to the programmed sensitivity, that is to say that the magnitude of the step can be equal to 1 LSB (least significant bit), or more than 1 LSB, for example, to 2, 4 or 8 LSB. Providing ADC 3 with a small step magnitude, for example, equal to 1 or 2 LSB, allows one to obtain a high precision, whereas using a greater step magnitude allows one to obtain a greater dynamic range of signal processing. A compromise thus has to be found between the desired sensitivity and precision that one desires to obtain. In one embodiment according to the invention, a table of conversion is used to select the step magnitude corresponding to the basic frequency and the step magnitude corresponding to the accelerated frequency for each sensitivity.
The advantage of such principle is the adaptation of the frequency and the step of the ADC as a function of the signal to be converted, and, indeed, the adaptation of conversion to reach the desired result as appropriate in the circumstances.
Referring to FIG. 5, the signal coming from amplifier 2 arrives at input lead 12, and is read each millisecond, and the corresponding digital signal word (digital value) is output on lead 13. The command signals which control the frequency of the counting operation and the step of counting, arrive by the bus 15 from microcontroller 4. Microcontroller 4 functions in real time and is preferably dedicated to the cardiac event detection.
An algorithm of cardiac event detection is integrated in microcontroller 4. The principle of the detection algorithm is based on a study of a variation of amplitude of the digital signals during a fixed duration of between 6 and 12 ms, and preferably equal to 9 ms, as in the example described. This principle is equivalent to a calculation of the slope over 9 ms of the sensed signal. The principle of calculation of the slope of the signal coming from the cardiac activity has already been developed by D. W. Davies, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,905,708, to distinguish different arrhythmias.
FIG. 6 represents a flow chart of the main algorithm of intracardiac event detection. Concerning the constraint of sign, it is found at step 120 to be enabled (YES) or order disabled (NO). The proposed algorithm determines, for each time t of sampling, the difference between the value x0 sampled at time t and the value x9 sampled at instant (t-9). Thus, the algorithm provides for storing in memory (e.g., a shift register) the last ten samples coming from ADC 3 and shifts them by a value at each instant of sampling t, e.g., the ADC sampling interval. See steps 110 and 112 of FIG. 6.
At step 114, the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9) is calculated and compared to a first threshold called threshold of acceleration. If the acceleration threshold is exceeded, at step 116 the ADC is commanded to function using the high frequency (for example 4 kHz, as compared to a basic frequency of 1 kHz) during a predefined period, equal to 4 ms in the example described, recyclable to each passing of the threshold of acceleration. The step magnitude of counter 23 of ADC 3 also can be modified at step 116 to follow the programmed sensitivity.
At step 118, the absolute value (ABS) of the difference (x0-x9) is then compared to a second threshold called threshold of detection, corresponding to the sensitivity programmed. If this second threshold is exceeded, the detection of an event is indicated as likely.
According to the invention, to indicate the presence of a cardiac event, it is also foreseen to add, at steps 120, 122 and 123, a constraint on the sign of the difference (x0-x9), in the case where this difference is greater than the threshold of detection, in order to consider this passing of threshold as being due to the presence of a spontaneous contraction and not due to a variation of the base line of the sensed signal provoked by other phenomena. This constraint of sign is imposed only after a stimulation, and in case of cross-talk.
Modifications of frequency and step of ADC 3 are made by providing appropriate command signals on bus 15 (FIG. 5). The detection and acceleration thresholds are provided to microcontroller 4 by microprocessor 5. A detection of event is indicated in the other parts of the pacemaker by the intermediary of output signal 14 (FIG. 1).
According to the invention, a phase of trapping of the signal is called after a stimulation. With reference to FIG. 7, in case of stimulation (Stim.), an absolute refractory period (ARP) begins in the cardiac chamber stimulated. This period whose duration is adjustable by the physician, corresponds to the period during which cells of the myocardium are refractory to all stimulation. In the beginning of the ARP, ADC 3 as well as the algorithm of detection are stopped so as to minimize the consumption of energy. Another period called period of study of the signal (PES) is included in the ARP as indicated in FIG. 7. The PES further decomposes itself in two periods, called period of trapping of the signal (PRS) and period of pre-detection (PPD).
In the beginning of the PRS period, ADC 3 is set to function at the high frequency and with a step equal to 8 LSB. This type of functioning allows to recapture the important variation of the signal caused by the stimulation between the beginning of the ARP and the moment of the re-activation of ADC 3 as shown in FIG. 8. In the example described, the PRS is fixed to 16 ms, which allows to cover the whole range of ADC 3.
After the PRS interval, the PPD period begins. During the PPD period, the frequency and step of the of the ADC are controlled by the algorithm of detection, that is to say that it functions at the basic frequency of 1 kHz with a normal step (e.g., 1 LSB) and these parameters can be modified if the sensed digital signal presents variations of slope as described.
The algorithm of detection is controlled to begin functioning at the beginning of the PPD. During this period, which is fixed to 32 ms in the example described, if one or several detections occur, they are considered as being provoked by a variation of the base line of the sensed cardiac signal after a stimulation. The sign of the last difference (x0-x9) that has generated a detection during the PPD is stored as indicated at step 119 of the flow chart of FIG. 9.
After the end of the ARP, a supplementary condition, the constraint of sign, is added to consider a detection as being really provoked by an event. This condition is a test of the sign of the difference (x0-x9). Differences (x0-x9) whose sign is opposite to that stored, and whose absolute value of the amplitude is greater than the threshold of detection, are sufficient alone to be considered as being provoked by a cardiac event.
The test of sign is further illustrated and described by the flow chart of the FIG. 10. The constraint on the sign of the calculated slope is suppressed in the following circumstances:
(1) the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9) does not exceed the threshold of acceleration during a certain period, selected to be 20 ms in the example described (See steps 124-127, 114, 120, 124, 125 FIG. 10). This last condition indicates that the base line is practically no longer altered,
(2) the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9) exceeds the threshold of detection, with a sign of the difference (x0-x9) contrary to the stored sign, which corresponds to the detection of a cardiac event (steps 114, 118, 120, 127), and
(3) 400 ms after the stimulation.
According to the invention, a processing of the phenomenon of cross-talk also is taken into account. In case of atrial stimulation (ventricular), the Sensed ventricular signal (atrial) can present a deflection due to the phenomenon of cross-talk. FIG. 11 illustrates this phenomenon on the ventricular signal during an atrial stimulation, to the exclusion of the spontaneous ventricular contraction induced by the atrial stimulation, and represented between times 1850 and 1900, the ventricular signal corresponds to the cross-talk. This deflection can be more or less important according to the atrial stimulation energy, characteristics of leads (material, surface) and the mode of stimulation and sensing (unipolar, bipolar).
The phenomenon of cross-talk is described a general manner in the literature by C. D. Johnson in "Atrial Synchronous Ventricular Inhibited (VDD) Pacemaker-Mediated Arrhythmia Due to Atrial Undersensing and Atrial Lead Oversensing of Far-Field Ventricular Afterpotentials of Paced Beats: Cross-talk", Pace, Vol. 9, pp 710-719, and a more particular manner by W. J. Combs et al. in "Cross-Talk in Bipolar Pacemakers", Pace, Vol. 12, pp 1613-1621.
During an atrial stimulation, a period called "blanking" (or the "blanking" interval) begins. The duration of the blanking interval is traditionally programmed by the physician according to the cross-talk observed on an intracardial ECG.
The invention thus presents the advantage to function either with a blanking interval that is programmed, or adjusted automatically according to the importance of the cross-talk present on the sensed signal.
The U.S. Pat. No. 4,974,589 describes an automatic adjustment method of the blanking period by re-triggering a period of sensing for each ventricular detection after an atrial stimulation. The period of blanking is considered as ended if no detection is recorded during the period of sensing, with nevertheless a maximal value of the duration of blanking not to exceed, for example, 50 ms.
Whatever type of blanking is chosen (programmed or automatic), the algorithm of detection stores the value of the base line (VLB) at the moment of the stimulation, and stops. At that time a first period, called period of non sensing (PNE), begins during which the ventricular detection circuit of the cardiac pacemaker is disconnected from the leads (i.e., the signal BLANK is active (FIG. 2)). In the embodiment described, the duration of the PNE period is 14 ms. This technique is very commonly used to protect electronic components at the input to the acquisition circuit against phenomenon of oversaturization due to the stimulation.
In the following discussion, it is necessary to differentiate the programmed blanking and the automatic blanking. For a duration of blanking programmed by the physician, there are again two possible processing types:
For a short programmed blanking duration, i.e., less than 32 ms in the embodiment described, the ADC functions, beginning at the end of the PNE period, at the high frequency with a step corresponding to the programmed sensitivity and continues such functioning until the end of the blanking period (FIG. 12).
For a duration of blanking that is programmed greater than 32 ms, the ADC functions, beginning at the end of the PNE period, at the high frequency with a step equal to 8 LSB, and continues such functioning for a period of 16 ms, called the period of following the signal (PSS). This is used because when the physician programs a duration of blanking that is important, that means that the deflection observed also is important. By this means, it is possible to follow correctly a rapid and important variation of the signal (FIG. 13)
For a duration of blanking adjusted automatically, the ADC starts to function, beginning at the end of the PNE, at the high frequency with a step equal to 8 LSB.
The algorithm of detection is reactivated at the end of the PNE period. At the end of the PNE period, a period called the period of following the signal (PPS) begins, during which the detection algorithm undertakes a test for the end of blanking. Once this test is validated, the period of blanking is ended (FIG. 14). The test of end of blanking is discussed below.
In case of a manual adjustment of the duration of the blanking, the detection algorithm is set to begin functioning at the end of the blanking period by a command coming from microprocessor 5. The algorithm begins by taking the signal value presented to the output of ADC 3, called the value of end of blanking (VFB), and it undertakes a test of cross-talk. The test of cross-talk, with reference to FIG. 15, calculates the amplitude and the sign of the deflection of the signal at the end of the blanking interval (steps 151, 152). The amplitude and the sign are calculated at step 153 by the difference between the value VFB and the value VLB. If the absolute value of the amplitude of the deflection due to the atrial stimulation is lower than the programmed detection threshold (at step 154), then the detection routine proceeds normally without the constraint of sign (step 155). However, if the absolute value of this amplitude is greater than the programmed detection threshold, there is risk to detect a signal caused by the deflection. Accordingly, a detection of event will be indicated at this time t only if the value of the difference (x0-x9) calculated at this time t is greater than the threshold, and if the sign of this difference is the same that of the deflection (step 156).
The constraint on the sign of the calculated slope is removed when during an period equal, for example, to 20 ms, the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9), namely ABS (x0-x9), does not exceed the threshold of acceleration (FIG. 10). This last condition indicates that the base line is practically no longer altered. This solution implies naturally that the period of blanking covers the first slope of the deflection.
In case of an automatic adjustment of the duration of the blanking, with reference to FIG. 16, the test of end of blanking rests on the double criterion of slope inversion (x0-x9), or slope (x0-x9) becoming very weak, i.e., small. Indeed, if the signs of two consecutive differences (x0-x9) are different or if the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9) becomes less than the threshold of acceleration, one can consider that the signal presents its maximal deflection (step 150, FIG. 16). Once this inversion is found, the algorithm of detection considers the period of blanking as ended and it executes the same test of cross-talk described previously with reference to FIG. 15.
A maximal period during which the inversion has to occur is previously fixed. This is to avoid remaining too long in the blanking if the signal presents an anomaly. This period is called blanking maximum BMAXI (FIG. 14).
As previously described, the principle of detection of a cardiac event rests on the comparison between the slope of the signal for a duration, e.g., 6 to 12 ms, preferably 9 ms, and an adjustable value selected, i.e., programmed, by the physician called threshold of detection.
Many studies show that the amplitude and the form of P waves and R waves vary from time to time as a function notably of the physical activity, the stress, the evolution of the pathology, etc . . . . Consequently, the sensitivity that is adjusted by the physician on the day the pacemaker is implanted can prove to be too low in some cases, which leads to an absence of detection of the spontaneous activity, or too high in other cases, which leads to detecting noise as a cardiac detection. In the two cases, the pacemaker is going to send a stimulation impulse at the end of each cycle of sensing.
In the case of a loss of detection, it is possible with applicant's invention to implement an automatic adjustment of the sensitivity. In this regard, known techniques consider the following. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,768,511 and 4,766,902 process an automatic sensitivity adjustment by comparison of the amplitude of the signal sensed with two thresholds. The sensitivity is considered as well adjusted if the first threshold is exceeded and not the second, the sensitivity is too high if the two thresholds are exceeded, and the sensitivity is too low if none of the two thresholds is exceeded. The threshold of detection is therefore modified following conditions previously stated. EP patent 0 349 130 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,827,934 use the same principle for the search of a satisfactory sensitivity, but in case of correction of the sensitivity, it is the gain of the circuit of detection, and that is modified, but not the threshold of detection. U.S. Pat. No. 4,708,144 refers to the search of sensitivity following a method that consists in studying the maximal value of the amplitude of the signal to detect, and determining an average with the maximal value of the preceding event. The sensitivity is then modified by a change of gain of the circuit of detection. Another known technique is disclosed copending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/994,725 which is hereby incorporated by reference.
According to the present invention, with reference to FIG. 17, the automatic adjustment of sensitivity involves studying the maximal value of the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9) after the detection of an event, and calculating the maximal value average of several events previously detected to determine the new sensitivity. To obtain the maximal value, after the detection of an event, a period of search of maximum (PRM), which is fixed in the embodiment described to 48 ms, is launched (step 212), during which the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9) is compared with a value called MAX initialed to zero in the beginning of the PRM period (steps 212, 214). If the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9) is greater than the value MAX, then MAX takes the value of the absolute value of the difference (x0-x9). The value MAX is stored in memory. This operation is realized by microcontroller 4 dedicated to the detection.
At the end of the PRM period, microprocessor 5 reads the value MAX on bus 16 (FIG. 1), and calculates the average of the last eight values MAX stored in memory (step 216). The microprocessor 5 calculates an intermediate threshold as a certain percentage of the average of the eight value MAX (step 218). In the embodiment described, the retained percentage is 37.5%. The microprocessor 5 also possesses in a memory a table in which are found all possible programmable sensitivities as well as thresholds of detection, thresholds of acceleration, frequencies and the corresponding steps of the ADC 3.
If the intermediate threshold is smaller than the programmed detection threshold (step 222), then the new threshold of detection is the next lower threshold in the table relative to the threshold of detection programmed.
If the intermediate threshold is greater than the threshold of detection next greater in the table to the programmed detection threshold (step 220), then the new threshold of detection is the next greater threshold in the table relative to the threshold programmed.
At the initialization (Step 200), the initial sensitivity is programmable by the physician (step 202). By default, its values are preferably 1.0 mV in the atrium an 2.2 mV in the ventricle. The eight value MAX are then initialized to the programmed sensitivity divided by 0.375.
In case of stimulation, the value MAX that is retained corresponds to the value initial MAX, and is the initial sensitivity divided by the retained percentage, i.e., 0.375 in the embodiment described. Following this principle, at the end of eight consecutive stimulations, the programmed sensitivity has for its value the initial sensitivity.
The present invention is suitable for use in, e.g., programmable dual chamber cardiac pacemakers, such as those available from ELA Medical, Montrouge France, under the trademark CHORUS, and compatible intracardial leads, which include known telemetry circuits, stimulation pulse generators, as well as microprocessor and associated storage registers, memory and software programming for cardiac monitoring and stimulation pulse delivery.
Advantages of the present invention include a reduction of the number of external electronic components, and an improved integration of components in the chip (integrated circuit) as a result of the switched capacitors of amplifier 2. Another advantage, linked to the large bandwidth of the filter and to the great dynamics of the amplifier, is that a unique electronic circuit of acquisition and detection of the cardiac activity is used both for the functioning of the cardiac pacemaker, i.e., cardiac event monitoring, and for the sensing of the intracardial ECG for telemetry transmission for external monitoring. Yet another advantage of the present invention is an improved detection algorithm that is more adaptive to sensed signals than prior techniques. These advantages arise input from the large bandwidth filter and the large dynamic amplifier which provide a non altered cardiac signal that is digital and can be easily and accurately processed.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4596252 *||6 May 1985||24 Jun 1986||Medtronic, Inc.||Pacer sense amplifier|
|US4692719 *||1 Aug 1986||8 Sep 1987||Telectronics N.V.||Combined pacemaker delta modulator and bandpass filter|
|US4708144 *||6 Oct 1986||24 Nov 1987||Telectronics N.V.||Automatic sensitivity control for a pacemaker|
|US4974589 *||17 Oct 1989||4 Dec 1990||Siemens-Pacesetter, Inc.||Automatically adjustable blanking period for implantable pacemaker|
|US5024221 *||17 Nov 1987||18 Jun 1991||Siemens-Pacesetter, Inc.||Programmable band-pass amplifier for use with implantable medical device|
|US5055843 *||31 Jan 1990||8 Oct 1991||Analog Devices, Inc.||Sigma delta modulator with distributed prefiltering and feedback|
|US5273049 *||9 Apr 1992||28 Dec 1993||Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.||Detection of cardiac arrhythmias using template matching by signature analysis|
|DE3226345A1 *||14 Jul 1982||19 Jan 1984||Siemens Ag||Implantable pacemaker having a detector controlling the same|
|WO1991010472A1 *||17 Jan 1991||25 Jul 1991||Medtronic, Inc.||Bandpass filter clock|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5669392 *||1 Jul 1996||23 Sep 1997||Pacesetter Ab||Device for varying the threshold detection level of a sensor|
|US5743267 *||27 Oct 1995||28 Apr 1998||Telecom Medical, Inc.||System and method to monitor the heart of a patient|
|US5758652 *||19 Oct 1995||2 Jun 1998||Nikolic; Serjan D.||System and method to measure the condition of a patients heart|
|US5954660 *||7 Jan 1998||21 Sep 1999||Ela Medical, S.A.||Apparatus for filtering cardiac signals|
|US6029087 *||22 Sep 1998||22 Feb 2000||Vitatron Medical, B.V.||Cardiac pacing system with improved physiological event classification based on DSP|
|US6337996||4 Jun 1999||8 Jan 2002||Ela Medical S.A.||Active implantable medical devices with refractory period management|
|US6609028||26 Apr 2001||19 Aug 2003||Medtronic, Inc.||PVC response-triggered blanking in a cardiac pacing system|
|US6650931 *||14 Nov 2001||18 Nov 2003||Pacesetter, Inc.||System and method of automatically determining the onsets and ends of cardiac events and far-field signals|
|US6725091 *||14 Mar 2001||20 Apr 2004||Ela Medical S.A.||Measuring a trans-septum bio-impedance in an active implantable medical device, in a particular pacemaker, defibrillator and/or cadiovertor and/or multisite device|
|US7130683||17 Sep 2002||31 Oct 2006||Medtronic, Inc.||Preferred ADI/R: a permanent pacing mode to eliminate ventricular pacing while maintaining back support|
|US7164949 *||13 Aug 2004||16 Jan 2007||Biotronik Gmbh & Co. Kg||Electrostimulator|
|US7218965||12 Jan 2004||15 May 2007||Medtronic, Inc.||Preferred ADI/R: a permanent pacing mode to eliminate ventricular pacing while maintaining backup support|
|US7245966||21 May 2004||17 Jul 2007||Medtronic, Inc.||Ventricular event filtering for an implantable medical device|
|US7248924||25 Oct 2004||24 Jul 2007||Medtronic, Inc.||Self limited rate response|
|US7254441||31 Mar 2004||7 Aug 2007||Medtronic, Inc.||Fully inhibited dual chamber pacing mode|
|US7502646||31 Jul 2006||10 Mar 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||Pacing mode event classification with rate smoothing and increased ventricular sensing|
|US7502647||31 Jul 2006||10 Mar 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||Rate smoothing pacing modality with increased ventricular sensing|
|US7515958||31 Jul 2006||7 Apr 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for altering pacing modality|
|US7542799||21 Jan 2005||2 Jun 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device with ventricular pacing protocol|
|US7565196||21 Jul 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for promoting intrinsic conduction through atrial timing|
|US7567835 *||18 Apr 2005||28 Jul 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||Method and apparatus for identifying oversensing using far-field intracardiac electrograms and marker channels|
|US7593773||21 Jan 2005||22 Sep 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device with ventricular pacing protocol including progressive conduction search|
|US7599740||15 May 2007||6 Oct 2009||Medtronic, Inc.||Ventricular event filtering for an implantable medical device|
|US7658196||25 Apr 2007||9 Feb 2010||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||System and method for determining implanted device orientation|
|US7689281||31 Jul 2006||30 Mar 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Pacing mode event classification with increased ventricular sensing|
|US7715914||31 Jul 2006||11 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for improving ventricular sensing|
|US7720537||31 Jul 2006||18 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for providing improved atrial pacing based on physiological need|
|US7738955||27 Apr 2005||15 Jun 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for ventricular pacing with AV interval modulation|
|US7775215||7 Mar 2006||17 Aug 2010||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||System and method for determining implanted device positioning and obtaining pressure data|
|US7775966||17 Aug 2010||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Non-invasive pressure measurement in a fluid adjustable restrictive device|
|US7783350||24 Aug 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for promoting intrinsic conduction through atrial timing modification and calculation of timing parameters|
|US7844342||30 Nov 2010||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Powering implantable restriction systems using light|
|US7856269||31 Jul 2006||21 Dec 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for determining phsyiologic events during pacing mode operation|
|US7869872||15 Jun 2006||11 Jan 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for determining intrinsic AV interval timing|
|US7881793||1 Feb 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for ventricular pacing with progressive conduction check interval|
|US7894898||22 Feb 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for ventricular interval smoothing following a premature ventricular contraction|
|US7904157||8 Mar 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||Self limited rate response|
|US7925344||20 Jan 2006||12 Apr 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method of using AV conduction timing|
|US7927270||29 Jan 2007||19 Apr 2011||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||External mechanical pressure sensor for gastric band pressure measurements|
|US8005539||23 Aug 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8016744||13 Sep 2011||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||External pressure-based gastric band adjustment system and method|
|US8016745||6 Apr 2006||13 Sep 2011||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Monitoring of a food intake restriction device|
|US8032216||4 Oct 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for determining intrinsic AV interval timing|
|US8034065||11 Oct 2011||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Controlling pressure in adjustable restriction devices|
|US8046063||28 Feb 2006||25 Oct 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device with adaptive operation|
|US8057492||15 Nov 2011||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Automatically adjusting band system with MEMS pump|
|US8060202||15 Nov 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||Ventricular event filtering for an implantable medical device|
|US8066629||12 Feb 2007||29 Nov 2011||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Apparatus for adjustment and sensing of gastric band pressure|
|US8100870||14 Dec 2007||24 Jan 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Adjustable height gastric restriction devices and methods|
|US8114345||8 Feb 2008||14 Feb 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||System and method of sterilizing an implantable medical device|
|US8142452||27 Dec 2007||27 Mar 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Controlling pressure in adjustable restriction devices|
|US8152710||28 Feb 2008||10 Apr 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Physiological parameter analysis for an implantable restriction device and a data logger|
|US8187162||29 May 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Reorientation port|
|US8187163||10 Dec 2007||29 May 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Methods for implanting a gastric restriction device|
|US8192350||5 Jun 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Methods and devices for measuring impedance in a gastric restriction system|
|US8221439||17 Jul 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Powering implantable restriction systems using kinetic motion|
|US8229558||24 Jul 2012||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for conditional biventricular pacing|
|US8229560||24 Jul 2012||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method of using AV conduction timing|
|US8233995||31 Jul 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||System and method of aligning an implantable antenna|
|US8244354||26 Feb 2010||14 Aug 2012||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for conditional biventricular pacing|
|US8249708||30 Jan 2009||21 Aug 2012||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8255047 *||20 Sep 1999||28 Aug 2012||Medtronic, Inc||Cardiac pacing system with improved physiological event classification and heart monitoring based on DSP|
|US8260412||30 Jan 2009||4 Sep 2012||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8265750||26 Feb 2010||11 Sep 2012||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for conditional biventricular pacing|
|US8337389||25 Dec 2012||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Methods and devices for diagnosing performance of a gastric restriction system|
|US8377079||27 Dec 2007||19 Feb 2013||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Constant force mechanisms for regulating restriction devices|
|US8386024||26 Feb 2013||Medtronic, Inc.||Method and apparatus for identifying oversensing using far-field intracardiac electrograms and marker channels|
|US8396553||26 Feb 2010||12 Mar 2013||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for conditional biventricular pacing|
|US8452394||30 Jan 2009||28 May 2013||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8532779||30 Jan 2009||10 Sep 2013||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8565873||18 Mar 2010||22 Oct 2013||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for providing improved atrial pacing based on physiological need|
|US8591395||28 Jan 2008||26 Nov 2013||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Gastric restriction device data handling devices and methods|
|US8591532||12 Feb 2008||26 Nov 2013||Ethicon Endo-Sugery, Inc.||Automatically adjusting band system|
|US8611996||30 Jan 2009||17 Dec 2013||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8688210||30 Jan 2009||1 Apr 2014||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8771184||4 May 2007||8 Jul 2014||Body Science Llc||Wireless medical diagnosis and monitoring equipment|
|US8774918||30 Jan 2009||8 Jul 2014||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US8792971||5 Nov 2012||29 Jul 2014||Medtronic, Inc.||Method and apparatus for identifying oversensing using far-field intracardiac electrograms and marker channels|
|US8870742||28 Feb 2008||28 Oct 2014||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||GUI for an implantable restriction device and a data logger|
|US20030078627 *||17 Sep 2002||24 Apr 2003||Medtronic, Inc.||Preferred ADI/R: a permanent pacing mode to eliminate ventricular pacing while maintaining backup support|
|US20040143299 *||12 Jan 2004||22 Jul 2004||Medtronic, Inc.||Preferred ADI/R: a permanent pacing mode to eliminate ventricular pacing while maintaining backup support|
|US20050049645 *||13 Aug 2004||3 Mar 2005||Biotronik Gmbh & Co. Kg||Electrostimulator|
|US20050055059 *||21 May 2004||10 Mar 2005||Betzold Robert A.||Ventricular event filtering for an implantable medical device|
|US20050177197 *||31 Mar 2005||11 Aug 2005||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for ventricular pacing with progressive conduction check interval|
|US20050267539 *||27 Apr 2005||1 Dec 2005||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for ventricular pacing with AV interval modulation|
|US20060089677 *||25 Oct 2004||27 Apr 2006||Casavant David A||Self limited rate response|
|US20060167506 *||21 Jan 2005||27 Jul 2006||Stoop Gustaaf A||Implantable medical device with ventricular pacing protocol|
|US20060167508 *||21 Jan 2005||27 Jul 2006||Willem Boute||Implantable medical device with ventricular pacing protocol including progressive conduction search|
|US20060235476 *||18 Apr 2005||19 Oct 2006||Gunderson Bruce D|
|US20070203523 *||28 Feb 2006||30 Aug 2007||Betzold Robert A||Implantable medical device with adaptive operation|
|US20070208235 *||4 May 2007||6 Sep 2007||Marcus Besson||Wireless medical diagnosis and monitoring equipment|
|US20070219589 *||20 Jan 2006||20 Sep 2007||Condie Catherine R||System and method of using AV conduction timing|
|US20070293897 *||15 Jun 2006||20 Dec 2007||Sheldon Todd J||System and Method for Promoting Instrinsic Conduction Through Atrial Timing Modification and Calculation of Timing Parameters|
|US20070293898 *||15 Jun 2006||20 Dec 2007||Sheldon Todd J||System and Method for Determining Intrinsic AV Interval Timing|
|US20070293899 *||15 Jun 2006||20 Dec 2007||Sheldon Todd J||System and Method for Ventricular Interval Smoothing Following a Premature Ventricular Contraction|
|US20070293900 *||15 Jun 2006||20 Dec 2007||Sheldon Todd J||System and Method for Promoting Intrinsic Conduction Through Atrial Timing|
|US20070299478 *||18 Jun 2007||27 Dec 2007||Casavant David A||Self Limited Rate Response|
|US20080027490 *||31 Jul 2006||31 Jan 2008||Sheldon Todd J||Pacing Mode Event Classification with Rate Smoothing and Increased Ventricular Sensing|
|US20080027492 *||31 Jul 2006||31 Jan 2008||Sheldon Todd J||Rate Smoothing Pacing Modality with Increased Ventricular Sensing|
|US20080027493 *||31 Jul 2006||31 Jan 2008||Sheldon Todd J||System and Method for Improving Ventricular Sensing|
|US20080275531 *||2 May 2008||6 Nov 2008||Cherik Bulkes||Implantable high efficiency digital stimulation device|
|US20090292331 *||2 Jun 2009||26 Nov 2009||Medtronic, Inc.|
|US20100114196 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114197 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114198 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114199 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114200 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114201 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114202 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114203 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114208 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100114224 *||30 Jan 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|US20100137927 *||1 Dec 2009||3 Jun 2010||Tengiz Tkebuchava||Multifunctional cardiac pacemaker system|
|US20100222834 *||2 Sep 2010||Sweeney Michael O||System and method for conditional biventricular pacing|
|US20100222837 *||2 Sep 2010||Sweeney Michael O||System and method for conditional biventricular pacing|
|US20100222838 *||2 Sep 2010||Sweeney Michael O||System and method for conditional biventricular pacing|
|US20110112596 *||12 May 2011||Medtronic, Inc.||System and method for determining intrinsic av interval timing|
|EP0774274A2 *||29 Oct 1996||21 May 1997||Telectronics N.V.||Pacemaker with automatic blanking period function|
|EP0962235A1 *||4 Jun 1999||8 Dec 1999||ELA MEDICAL (Société anonyme)||Implantable medical device with improved management of refractory periods|
|WO2005113065A2 *||21 May 2005||1 Dec 2005||Medtronic, Inc.||Ventricular device event filtering for an implantable medical|
|WO2005113065A3 *||21 May 2005||22 Dec 2005||Paul A Belk||Ventricular device event filtering for an implantable medical|
|WO2010051426A1 *||30 Oct 2009||6 May 2010||Medtronic, Inc.||Implantable medical device crosstalk evaluation and mitigation|
|WO2010065488A2 *||1 Dec 2009||10 Jun 2010||Tengiz Tkebuchava||Multifunctional cardiac pacemaker system|
|WO2010065488A3 *||1 Dec 2009||7 Oct 2010||Tengiz Tkebuchava||Multifunctional cardiac pacemaker system|
|U.S. Classification||600/517, 128/903|
|International Classification||A61N1/368, A61N1/37|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S128/903, A61N1/3704, A61N1/368|
|European Classification||A61N1/37B2, A61N1/368|
|3 Mar 1994||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ELA MEDICAL, FRANCE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEE, CHIK-YAM;CLAUDON, LAURENT;MOLIN, RENZO D.;REEL/FRAME:006889/0983
Effective date: 19940104
|23 Jul 1998||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|30 Jul 2002||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|27 Jul 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12