Surely. The reviewer could screen it for spam or advertising other items. So it would only be used for presenting the changelog. Would be nice
Isn’t there any other symbol besides the dot that looks less visible? Until they solve this. Perhaps when left empty the heading could be disabled, sounds logical.
The elephant in the room is that this long-awaited upgrade will cause us to spend more time on the forums
A few months ago, express withdrawals were introduced for very high level authors. They should be allowed for level 3 up authors now as well.
That’s after $40K and only because they don’t seem comfortable holding that much money on your behalf, as they are not a bank after all.
I’m looking for the official statement which says it’s disallowed to use incentives to get people to buy our products. I’d like to point a link to the officisal source / explanation in a FAQ entry where I explain why I cannot give discounts on items.
The fact that Envato Support can’t change an incorrect withdrawal email address or similar suggests it was poorly designed or someone wanted it as secure as possible for some reason.
That’ll be a problem since a withdrawal of mine was made using incorrect SWIFT details, let’s hope they fix it
What’s more interesting is what happens the money from the end of the month until the 15th when they actually start processing. It’d be better if payouts would occur on the 1st day of each month and the deadline to request would be the end of the month as usual. Wouldn’t that be more logical?
I just noticed these, when were these added? Great!
Optional WordPress Plugin Compatible With
My questions are… why won’t the “Optional WordPress Plugin” accept my WP plugin zip, where I clearly have the header in the main php file? It says the plugin header is not found.
And should I tick any plugin on the “compatible with” list that may have nothing to do with my plugin, but doesn’t cause an incompatibility either? Therefore they are compatible. Or should I just tick those for which I’ve built in compatibility explicitly?