2145:7566Share edittextuser=1095 post_id=7566 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=2145
Congratulations to "On the Cutting Edge"published Feb 26, 2010
When I first heard Cathy and Dave talk about how they wanted to create a community of people who would share ideas and support each other in teaching about the Earth, I didn't get it. I could think of a lot of things that might make my teaching more effective and my professional life easier. But "a community" wasn't one of them.
Only in retrospect, can I see where this was going. The first paragraph of the prize essay makes the point well:
There were several important insights here: First of all, that a community was needed. Secondly, that a community was something that could be built, purposefully. Thirdly, how to plan and execute a set of actions that would integrate to create an effective community. In my experience, such thinking is deeply foreign to most natural scientists.
I clearly remember the first time that a professor asked me and my classmates to analyze an authentic geoscience data set as a normal class assignment. That would be Robert Gordon at Yale in approximately 1974. And I remember equally clearly the first time I encountered an authentic data set to analyze on a mid-term exam; that would be Joris Gieskes, at Scripps, in approximately 1976. These educational experiences remain vivid in my memory more than 30 years later, I think in part because they were so unusual and in part because they were so interesting and real.
From my present perspective, I now realize that creating these memorable educational experiences must have required a substantial input of knowledge, time, effort and imagination on the part of those professors, to identify appropriate data and craft appropriate exercises, beginning all the way back with the raw wool. They couldn't and didn't lay out an entire course this way, only isolated exercises, and only a handful of students benefitted.
Cathy and Dave and colleagues had the brilliant insight that we don't each need to do everything ourselves. We can each do what we are good at, share our best products and ideas with our colleagues, and all come out ahead, faculty and students both. Unlike garments or loaves of bread, pedagogical insights and learning activities are not ragged or gone after the first person is done using them. They can get better rather than worse with additional use and polishing. This all sounds easy and obvious, in retrospect, but it was not so at the time. Farseeing vision and masterful social engineering underlie the success of "On the Cutting Edge."
- Related Post: "Not Invented Here," by Dave Mogk, 10 Oct 2009.
Congratulations to "On the Cutting Edge" --Discussion
2145:7624Share edittextuser=75 post_id=7624 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=2145
2145:8473Share edittextuser=3024 post_id=8473 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=2145
2145:8558Share edittextuser=3 post_id=8558 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=2145