|Publication number||US3735096 A|
|Publication date||May 22, 1973|
|Filing date||Dec 13, 1971|
|Priority date||Dec 13, 1971|
|Also published as||CA975465A, CA975465A1, DE2259938A1, DE2259938B2, DE2259938C3|
|Publication number||US 3735096 A, US 3735096A, US-A-3735096, US3735096 A, US3735096A|
|Inventors||R Knockeart, F Russo|
|Original Assignee||Bendix Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (23), Classifications (13)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent [191 Knockeart et al.
[451 May 22, 1973  SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING CODED PULSE DATA  Inventors: Ronald P. Knockeart, Walled Lake; Frank A, Russo, Farmington, both of Mich.
 Assignee: The Bendix Corporation, Southfield,
 Filed: Dec. 13, 1971 21 Appl. No.: 207,150
 US. Cl. ..235/6l.l1 E  Int. Cl. ..G06k 7/10  Field of Search ..'.235/6l.11 E, 61.11 D,
235/61.12 M; 250/219 D, 219 DC; 340/1463 K, 146.2 A, 172.5, 347 P, 347 DD Genzel et a1 ..235/61. 12 N Fickenscher et al ..235/6l.l 1 E Primary Examiner-Daryl Cook Attorney-Lester L. Hallacher and William S. Thompson 57 ABSTRACT This invention is directed to a system for processing pulse information which is coded in binary, BCD, or some other type of pulse code. The information is coded into a polurality of active states which represent a series of functional operations. The functional operations occur in a specific sequence, and all operations occur several times before an output is generated. Accordingly, the system is capable of distinguishing each state and of either accepting or rejecting incoming data signals, depending upon the correspondence of the incoming signals with the defined operational functions. As each state is properly received, the system sequences to receive the next state. After a complete set of states is received, the data signals are stored and the remainder of the system cleared of all processing signals. The data received during the next complete series of states is compared with the prior data stored and, if a valid comparison results, a data ready signal generated. After a preselected number of valid comparisons are made the pulse code is accepted as valid and used to actuate a utilization device.
33 Claims, 22 Drawing Figures ZOG/C PATENTED HAY22 I975 SHEET 03 0F 11 PATENTED HAY 2 2 I975 SHEET *VU u .10 KQRnh PATENI mam sum 07 or 1 mk gk Nam Ill WNPQS m} Aum PATENTEUMAYZZIHTS SHEET 09 0F 11 us Q KW QR 8 PEN by NK PATENTEB HAY 2 2 I973 PATENIE wems SHEET '11 0F 11 out 9v vmu Moo zu kxW SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING CODED PULSE DATA BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The inventive system is primarily intended to serve as the data processing circuitry for an automatic label reading system. Accordingly, it can be best understood by referring to FIG. 7, which shows a simplified label scanning system with which the inventive system can be employed.
In FIG. 7, a Container 11 containing a plurality of coded Labels 14, 16, and 17 moves along a Conveyor 12 in a direction indicated by Arrow l3. Mounted in some convenient position is a Prism 18 which has a plurality of reflective Surfaces 19. Prism 18 is mounted for rotation so that light from a Source 21 is directed to Container 11 and reflected back to the Prism 18 as indicated by Lines 22 and 24. The reflected Light 24 is then reflected by Prism 18 to a Detector 26. Detector 26 converts the reflected light to electrical pulses which are directed to Processing Logic 25 along Output Lead 28.
Because Labels 14, 16, and 17 contain segments having different light reflecting capabilities, the reflected light is modulated in accordance with this reflective capability. Detector 26 converts the varying light to varying electrical signals and produces a train of pulses having durations dependent upon the varying signal. Accordingly, the input to the Processing Logic 25 is a square wave which is representative of the various reflective capabilities of the segments of the labels. The input to Logic 25 is thus a binary coded input which is decoded by the Processing Logic 25 so that the contents of Container 11 can be uniquely identified in accordance with the code established by the segments of Labels l4, l6, and 17.
The invention is directed to Processing Logic 25 which is used to decode and process the information to unambiguously identify Container 11.
FIGS. 1 and 2 show exemplary labels which are useful with the inventive logic circuitry. FIG. 1 shows a semicircular label but it should be understood that, in the inventive system, the label would be circular so that it has complete radial symmetry about its center point. The label is shown as semicircular simply as a convenience in pointing out the various states and logic conditions defined by the various segments of the label. FIG. 2 shows a rectangular label which can be used with the inventive system. This label can be used in conjunction with one or more similar labels so that the coded information presented to the decoding system can be increased simply by increasing the number of labels on thecontainer.
In both labels the segments having various reflective capabilities are dimensioned so that various functional operations of the label are defined in accordance with the widths of the segments.
In the circular label partially shown in FIG. 1, the first section of the wide dark segment which circumvents the entire periphery of the label to intersect the scanning energy is used to initiate State No. 1, which is used as a label locating segment. When a container is located, the processing circuitry goes into State No. 0, which means the circuit is prepared to receive data. When the wide dark segment is scanned and verified to be within a range of widths, the segment is validated as beinga label segment. Upon validation the transition from the wide dark segment to the narrow white segment initiates State No. 1.
FIG. 3a shows that State No. 0 exists before the wide dark segment is reached and lasts until the scanning energy reaches the first narrow white segment which starts State No. 1. FIG. 3b shows that State No. l lasts for the duration of the narrow white segment, the end of which signals the beginning of State No. 2.
It should be noted that the rectangular label shown in FIG. 2 also has dark and light segments defining States No. l and No. 2 in a manner similar to those of the circular label.
State No. 2 is a series of dark and light segments which define the coded information present on the label. It should be noted that each dark and light segment is one of two possible widths and one of two possible energy reflective capabilities. Adjacent segments have different reflective capabilities but adjacent segments can have the same or different widths. The coded segments are paired so that each pair contains one dark and one light, and also one wide and one narrow segment. Each pair of segments defines a logic condition of a logic 0 or a logic 1. Because all coded segments pairs include a wide and a narrow segment, and because segment narrow segments are equal in width, all.
coded segment pairs are equal in width and thus all logic conditions are defined by equal dimensions of label spacings. The logic condition defined by each pair of coded data segments is determined by the reflective capability of the widest segment in the pair. For example, the first data pair contained within State No. 2 of the circular label of FIG. 1 is a narrow dark segment and a wide light segment. The light segment dominates, and this condition is selected to represent a logic 0 condition. The fifth pair of coded data segments includes a wide dark segment and a narrow light segment. The dark segment dominates this pair, which therefore defines a logic 1 condition.
The label of FIG. 1 contains 11 coded pairs of data segments and therefore defines eleven logic conditions. As a consequence, if straight binary coding is used, the label of FIG. 1 contains 11 coded pairs of data segments and therefore defines eleven logic conditions. As a consequence, if straight binary coding is utilized there are 2 possible combinations of 0s and ls. Accordingly, there are 2,048 possible combinations and hence, 2,048 different identifications can be made by utilizing the label of FIG. 1. Obviously, if desired, data pairs can be added or subtracted to either increase or decrease the available information on the label.
Binary Coded Decimal (BCD) can also be used if desired. For example, if the coded information on the label of FIG. 2 is BCD and the most significant data pair is that on the left and the least significant is that on the right, the first four data pairs, respectively, represent the logic conditions 0101. In BCD this combination represents the character 5." The next four data pairs, respectively, represent the logic conditions 1001, and in BCD define the character 9. The label of FIG. 2 thus identifies the number 59 in BCD. However, a straight binary coding can be used to identify any one of 2 or 256 unique combinations. It will be appreciated that both label configurations can be encoded using either BCD or straight binary coding. Also, other types can be used if desired.
Referring again to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, immediately following State No. 2 is a narrow dark segment which is identified as State No. 3 The segment which defines State No. 3 has a width which is equal to the narrow width of the coded segments and therefore is used primarily to separate the coded information segments from the wide light segment which defines State No. 4. FIG. 3d shows that State No. 3 lasts for the duration of the narrow segment. State No. 4 is different in reflectivity from the segment which defines State No. but can be of an equal width, if desired. The segments defining States 0, 4, and 8 are wider than the other segments in order to more easily and reliably distinguish them from the other segments. The State 4 segment is used to indicate that a complete sequence of the preceding segments which define States I to 3 has been scanned, and indicates that all coded data has been scanned. At the end of State 4 the logic circuitry is prepared to do either one of two things: For the circular label of FIG. I, after a complete scan of State 4, the logic circuit is prepared to receive a series of data which is identical to that received during the first four states but which comes into the logic circuitry in reverse order. For the rectangular label of FIG. 2, and when a single label is present upon the container, State 4 indicates that a complete scan of a label has been effected and that the data is ready for processing within the logic circuitry. However, when a plurality of rectangular labels are placed upon Container ill, the second label will preferably be upside down with respect to the first label so that the first segment scanned on the second label will be of a reflective capability which is opposite from that of the State 1 segment of the first label. In this case, State 4 of the first label will be used to indicate termination of the first label and to prepare the logic circuitry to receive data from the second label in reverse order from that of the first label. Thus, for the second label the coded data segments are preceded by a wide light segment instead of a wide dark segment.
The similarity of the two labels shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 will be appreciated in that they both define a series of functional states which are quite similar. That is, the first half of the circular label is identical to one rectangular lable, and the second half of the circular label is identical to a second, inverted rectangular label. This becomes more evident as the discussion proceeds.
Referring again to the label of FIG. I, at the completion of the scanning of the light center of the label which defines State 4 the narrow dark segment which defines State 3 is again scanned, at this instant the segment defines State 5. State is used to separate State 4 from the data segments which make up State 6. State 5 therefore also serves as an initiation segment for preparing the logic circuitry to receive data during State 6. The data received during State 6 is identical to that received during State 2 but is in reverse order. The coincidence of States 4, 5, and 6 with the various segments can be seen in FIGS. 3e, 3f, and 3g. In each instance, the particular state begins and ends with the particular segment which defines it.
At the completion of State 6 the narrow light segment which defines State 1 is again scanned and then defines State 7. State 8 separates the coded information from the wide dark segment which defines label termination State 8. This segment circumvents the periphery of the label and accordingly is used to define both States 0 and 8. This wide dark segment therefore defines both the label initiation and the label termination data, and accordingly the orientation of the label during a scan is of no consequence. The only requirement for a valid scan is the passage of the scan line through the label center, which defines State 4.
In comparing the rectangular label of FIG. 2 with the circular label of FIG. 1 and remembering that a second rectangular label would be rotated 180 with respect to the first label of FIG. 2, the first five states would be identical for the two labels. The last four segments would also be identical by utilizing the two light segments of the rectangular labels in the same manner as the center of the circular label. Thus, when using two reversed rectangular labels, State 4 will be defined by the two wide light segments of the two labels, and State 5 of the second label would be defined by a narrow dark segment. The coded information of State 6 would be received in the order of a light segment and then a dark segment; this order is the reverse order from the first rectangular label but is the identical order of the second half of the circular label. The second rectangular label would be terminated on a narrow light segment and then a dark wide segment, the same as the second half of the circular label. All States (I through 9 of the circular label are therefore repeated when two mutually inverted rectangular labels are used. This feature is very advantageous because it permits the use of very similar logic circuitry irrespective of the label configuration. Consequently, any particular system can be utilized with either circular or rectangular labels simply by providing a means for selecting the label configuration and number.
As will be more fully described hereinafter, a plurality of circular labels can also be used on a single container. When this is done, the labels should be separated such that the complete scanning of the State 4 center of a label is effected before starting to scan the State 4 center of a succeeding label. Unless this con straint is followed, the logic circuitry must be equipped with a means for separating the data received from each label.
A plurality of alternately inverted rectangular labels can also be used by reversing the role of the wide dark and light segments for the inverted labels. Thus, for the labels arranged so that the wide light segment is scanned first, the wide light segment is the label locating segment and the wide dark segment is the label terminating segment. This is a convenient operation because label counting circuitry can be added to the logic circuit so that a wide choice in the numbers is available simply by setting a selector switch.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS Patent application Ser. No. 207,206 titled Coded Label for Automatic Reading Systems filed by Frank A. Russo and Ronald P. Knockeart of even date herewith and also assigned to The Bendix Corporation, describes circular and square labels which can be used with the invention described herein.
Patent application, Ser. No. 207,036 titled Rotating Prism Scanning System Having Range Compensation" filed by Ronald P. Knockeart of even date herewith and assigned to The Bendix Corporation, describes an optical system useful with the inventive system.
Patent application, Ser. No. 207,214 titled System for Converting Modulated Signal to Digital Outputs filed by Ronald P. Knockeart and John R. Wilkinson of even date herewith and assigned to The Bendix Corporation, describes analog circuitry useful in formulating the square wave pulse information utilized as the inputs to the inventive system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In the inventive system the coded information is received from the label and is synchronized with a clock pulse. At the same time the incoming coded pulse is used to generate two strings of transition pulses which coincide with the transitions of the reflected energy from dark to light and from light to dark. It will be appreciated that throughout the description light, white, and high reflectivity are used interchangeably; this also is true of dark, black," and low reflectivity."
The coded information is directed to a light bar counter and a dark bar counter. The bar counters are gated by the reflected signals of the light and dark label segments, respectively, so that pulses from a clock are injected into the respective counters in accordance with the widths of the light and dark bars on the label. The counts present in the light and dark bar counters are thus proportional to the widths of the light and dark bars on the scanned label.
The transitions of the reflected energy between the light and dark segments are used to gate a light count buffer and a dark count buffer so that these buffers, re-
spectively, receive the strings of pulses representative of the widths of the light segments and the dark segments. The total pulse counts present in the light count buffer and the dark count bufier are added to determine that the total pulses counted are within specified maximum and minimum values to thereby verify that the scanned pulses have been derived from label segments rather than from dirt spots or other environmental conditions present on the container or label.
After a determination has been made that the total count is valid, the pulse-count present in the light count buffer is compared with that present in the dark count buffer and the highest of these two counts is used to determine the logic condition for that particular pair of segments. Thus, the logic 0 and logic 1 conditions of the coded pulse train are determined by the highest count present in the two buffers. The logic conditions are therefore determined by the widest segment present in the coded segment pairs. The various outputs emanated are directed to a state counter which sequentially sets the remaining portions of the logic circuitry in accordance with States 1 through 9 explained hereinabove with respect to FIGS. 1 and 2.
After the logic condition of two consecutive coded segments forming a coded pulse pair is established as either a 0 or a l, the logic condition is injected into a bit-assembly register. The bit-assembly register receives a logic 1 or 0 for each pair of coded pulse segments on the label until all pairs are represented by a l or 0 in the bit-assembly register. After the bitassembly register receives a logic pulse for each coded pair of segments on the label (11 for the label shown in FIG. 1), it stores the assembled pulse train. The state counter then actuates the bit-assembly register so that it can receive the next string of 11 pulses in reverse order. After the entire second string of pulses has been injected into the bit assembly register, the two strings of pulses are compared and, if they are identical, an increment counter is actuated to ultimately result in the generation of a valid scan indication. If the two pulse trains are not identical the logic circuitry is cleared and the process repeated.
The above operation is repeated for each complete scan of the label and, after a preselected number of valid scan indications are generated, the data present in the bit-assembly register is passed to a utilization device through an output register. The number of consecutive valid scans required for presentation of the assembled pulse trains to the utilization circuitry is a function of the desired reliability of the system. Therefore, as the required reliability increases the number of consecutive valid scans also increases. However, the complexity of the logic circuitry also increases. An excellent trade-off between reliability and complexity can be realized by requiring two consecutive valid scans for each valid scan indication, and two valid scan indications for passage of the data to the utilization device. Thus, four valid scans must be effected, but they need not be consecutive so long as they occur in pairs of consecutive scans. In other words, the first two consecutive valid scans yield one valid scan indication, and the next two consecutive valid scans yield the second valid scan indication, irrespective of the occurrence of the second pair with respect to the first pair, and irrespective of the presence of other valid scans between the two pairs of consecutive scans.
After two valid scan indications are generated, the assembled pulse train is transformed in parallel to the utilization device. The utilization device can be a visual digital readout, escort memory, diverter, or a computer which processes the data to activate some form of control device, printing device, or graphic plotting device.
The inventive system generates logic ls and Os by comparing the reflective capabilities of two segments within a coded pair. This is a major advantage and overcomes one of the major shortcomings of the prior art systems which depend on absolute segment widths for logic 1 and 0 generation. In the inventive system the total width of two segments is established as being within a range and only one of the segment widths is measured over a range, and this is done for label validation purposes, not to read the label.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 shows a one-half of a circular label useful with the inventive system.
FIG. 2 shows a rectangular label of which one or more can be used with the inventive system.
FIG. 3, consisting of FIGS. 3a to 3j, relates label States 0 to 9 to the segments of the circular label shown in FIG. 2.
FIG. 4, consisting of FIGS. 4a and 4b, is a preferred embodiment of a logic circuitry which can be used with the circular label of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 consists of FIGS. 5a to Sc wherein FIG. 5a
' shows the binary input received from the rectangular shows the TD signal generated when the binary input of FIG. 6a is injected into the inventive system.
FIG. 7 is a simplified showing of a scanning mechanism with which the inventive system can be employed.
FIG. 8 is a preferred embodiment of logic circuitry which can be used with one or more of the rectangular labels shown in FIG. 2.
FIG. 9 is a preferred embodiment of a counter useful with rectangular labels.
FIG. 10 is a preferred embodiment of a state counter useful when either circular or rectangular labels are scanned.
FIG. 11 shows logic circuitry which can be used to generate the required LAB signal.
FIG. 12 is a preferred embodiment of a system for changing the clock rate as a function of scan angle and scan distance.
FIG. 13 shows the identification of labels as the most significant and least significant.
FIG. 14 shows how the scan speed and apparent bar width vary with scan angle and distance.
FIG. 15 shows the Light and Dark Count Decoders which generate the count inputs for the State Counters shown in FIGS. 9 and 10.
FIG. 16 shows the State Change Counter and State Decoder used with the State Counter of FIG. 9.
FIG. 17 shows the State Counter, Label Counter, and Label Count Decoder used with the embodiment shown in FIG. 8.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION FIG. 7 shows how transmitted Energy 22, such as light from a Laser 21, is directed to Object 11 by Reflective Surfaces 19 of Prism 18 so that reflected Energy 24 is received by a Detector 26. Detector 26 includes a system for converting the reflected energy to electrical signals and therefore can include a photomultiplier tube or some other similar unit. Detector 26 also includes analog processing circuitry which converts the electrical signal into a binary wave train. Accordingly, if the circular label shown in FIG. 1 is scanned by the transmitted energy, the waveform shown in FIG. 6a will be present upon Line 28 and serve as an input to Processing Logic 25.
FIGS. 40 and 4b together show a preferred embodiment of the logic circuitry contained within Processing Logic 25. In FIG. 4a, Input Terminal 28 is shown serving as an input to a Synchronization Circuit 31, which also receives a clock input from a Clock Oscillator 32. Terminal 28 is shown in FIG. 7 as receiving the output of Detector 26. Clock Oscillator 32 has an Output Lead 33 upon which the clock signals are present during the entire time that the oscillator is running. It should be noted that these signals are applied to various AND gates throughout the logic circuitry, and therefore the CLK" inputs shown throughout the logic circuit receive the input from Clock Oscillator 32 (the connecting lines are omitted for convenience and clarity).
Synchronizing Circuit 31 is a standard configuration circuit and is utilized to synchronize the input waveform present on Input Terminal 28 with the clock oscillator input. Synchronization Circuit 31 also serves to generate the TL and TD pulse trains shown in FIGS. 6b and 60, respectively. The TL and TD waveforms are dependent upon the transitions of the input waveform received as the result of scanning the circular label of FIG. 1. The TL pulse train of FIG. 6b has a pulse for transition from the high level to the low level, and thus the pulses of the TL pulse train occur for each transition from a light bar to a dark bar. In similar manner, the TD pulse train has a pulse for each transition from a dark bar to a light bar. The TD and TL pulses are illustrated as single pulses for simplicity and clarity, actually a series of very narrow and closely spaced pulses are generated for each transition of reflective capability.
The binary input signal present on Input Terminal 28 is also present on Output Terminal 34 of Sync Circuit 31 but is synchronous with the clock oscillator. AND Gate 36 receives the coded waveform (FIG. 6a) and also a clock input (CLK) from Oscillator 32. Accordingly, pulses from the CLK input are injected into Light Bar Counter 37 during the entire period of time that the light bar level exists in the binary input received from Detector 26.
The binary input signal present on Output Terminal 34 of Sync Circuit 31 is also applied to one input of another AND Gate 38 through an Inverter Circuit 39 by way of Lead 41. AND gate 38 also receives the CLK input from Oscillator 32 so that pulses are injected into Dark Bar Counter 42 while the binary input signal is at the low level.
An AND Gate 43 receives the TL signal shown in FIG. 6b and the CLK signal from Clock Oscillator 32 as inputs. Therefore, when the TL signal is generated at the transition from the light bar level to the low bar level, AND Gate 43 generates an output pulse which actuates Light Count Buffer 44. The pulses counted by Light Bar Counter 37 are then transferred to Light Count Buffer 44. Light Count Buffer 44 thus contains a digital number which is representative of the total width of the light segment scanned between the two consecutive TL pulses.
An AND Gate 46 receives the TD signal shown in FIG. 60 and the CLK signal from Clock Oscillator 32 to actuate a Dark Count Buffer 47. Dark Count Buffer 47 therefore operates in a manner similar to Light Count Buffer 44 to receive a count representative of the width of the dark bar segment scanned between two consecutive TD pulses. Reference to FIGS. 6a, 6b, and 6c shows that one TL and TD pulse is generated for each pair of data segments. For this reason, the total count of pulses within Buffers 44 and 47 is proportional to the total width of a pair of coded segments. The pulse counts individually contained within Light Count Buffer 44 and Dark Count Buffer 47 therefore are each respectively indicative of the widths of the dark and light data segments contained within a pair of data segments defining a digital pulse space. Accordingly, these two strings of pulses are injected in parallel to Adder 48. After being added in parallel, the data are injected into a Period Test Comparator 49. Period Test Comparator 49 is used to verify the width of the digital pulse spaced defined by the pair of data segments and thereby positively indicates that a valid pair of data segments has been scanned instead of simply a dark and light spot which may incidentally sequentially appear on the container or some other place within the scan environment. This is accomplished by injecting a reference number representing the lower limit and upper limit permissible for the total width of the scanned bars into Test Comparator 49 and comparing the scanned count received from the dark and light segments with the reference count. When a valid determination is made, a lower limit signal and an upper limit signal are respectively injected into a state Counter 51 via Lines 52 and 53.
State Counter 51, which is more fully described hereinafter, is used to generate state signals through 9 so that the logic circuit operates consistently with the states defined with respect to the labels of FIG. 1 and 2 and the pulse trains shown in FIGS. 50 and 6a.
A Bit Comparator 54 also receives inputs from Light Count Buffer 44 and Dark Count Buffer 47. The output lines of Light Count Buffer 44 are connected to Bit Comparator 54 by way of Terminals 56 and 57, while the output signals from Dark Count Buffer 47 are coupled to Bit Comparator 54 by way of Leads 58 and 59. It should be understood throughout the description that the number of leads connecting the various circuits is actually substantially higher than the two shown for each circuit as indicated by the dots which appear between the leads connecting each circuit. In actuality there would be a lead for each bit of information running between the two circuits. An abbreviated showing is used in order to simplify the drawing and the description.
Bit Comparator 54 compares the number of bits received from Light Count Buffer 54 and Dark Count Buffer 47 to determine which count is greatest. When the dark count exceeds the light count it indicates that a dark segment for the data pair scanned was wider than the light segment, and therefore a signal is provided on Output Lead 61. Because the dark count exceeded the light count, a logic 1 condition is indicated for the processed pair of data segments. This signal is directed to an AND Gate 62 which also receives the CLK input from Oscillator 32 and a State 2 input. Therefore, because State 2 has been successfully processed in State Counter 51, a State 2 signal is present at the input of AND Gate 62 and a logic 1 input is provided to Bit Assembly Register 63.
If the weight comparison of the contents of Light Count Buffer 44 and Dark Count Buffer 47 performed in Bit Comparator 54 shows that the light count exceeds the dark count there is no output signal present on Output Lead 61. This represents the 0 logic condition which is shown in FIG. 1 as occurring when thelight segment width is in excess of the dark segment width. With no pulse on Line 61, AND Gate 62 yields no pulse and the input to Bit Assembly Register 63 is a logic 0.
It will also be noted in FIG. 4 that the output signal present on Output Terminal 61 of Bit Comparator 54 is directed to an AND Gate 64, which also receives a clock input (CLK) and a State 6 input. Because State 6 is a logic 0 condition for all segments of the FIG. 1 label except the second scan across the coded segments, AND Gate 64 does not supply a pulse to Bit Assembly Register 63 in any state except State 6. This condition is desirable because, in the first half of the scanning of the circular label of FIG. 1, the input data is directed to the Bit Assembly Register 63 from the right to left through AND Gate 62. However, as will be more fully explained hereinafter, after the completion of the State 4, which is the center of the circular label shown in FIG. 1, the data is received from the label in reverse order from that of the first three states. Therefore, AND Gate 62 is disabled because of the absence of a State 2 input and AND Gate 64 is actuated by the presence of the State 6 input so that the received data is injected into Bit Assembly Register 63 in the reverse order from the State 2 order. Thus, the data is injected into Register 63 in the same sequence for States 2 and 6, and a direct comparison of the two sets of data received from both halves of the circular label is possible.
The operation up to this point has described how 1 bit of data is received by the bit assembly register because of the scanning of one pair of coded data segments contained within the State 2 portion of the circular label of FIG. 1. After the completion of one segment of data, the entire procedure is repeated in that the segments of the second pair are counted in the Light Bar Counter 37 and Dark Bar Counter 42, and the counts are subsequently injected into Light Count Buffer 44 and Dark Count Buffer 47 when the TL and TD signals, respectively, actuate AND Gate 43 and 46. This pair of data bits is then also injected into Bit Comparator 54 to generate a logic I or logic 0 on Output Terminal 61 dependent upon the comparative weight of the light bar count and dark bar count. This process continues until a logic 1 or logic 0 is injected into Bit Assembly Register 63 for each pair of data segments contained within State 2 of the label being scanned. Accordingly, for the exemplary labels shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, eleven and 8 bits of data, respectively, will be sequentially injected into Bit Assembly Register 63.
Bit Assembly Register 63 has two Output Terminals 68 and 69 which are shown connected to Label Code Storage Circuit 71 shown in FIG. 4b. Output Leads 68 and 69 are also respectively connected to Label Code Comparator 72 by way of Leads 66 and 67. For convenience, Leads 66 through 69 are identically labeled in FIGS. 4a and 4b and are shown having Terminals 66' through 69. It should therefore be understood that the identical numbering of leads and terminals in FIGS. 4a and 4b and the use of Terminals 66' to 69' is done to show that these are the same parts in both figures, and FIG. 4b is a continuation of FIG. 4a.
The l 1 bits of data assembled in Bit Assembly Register 63 are transferred to Label Code Storage Circuit 71 at the end of the coded information. Label Code Storage Circuit 71 receives an input from OR Gate '73 which is actuated by a State 3 and a State 9 signal, and also by an input received from AND Gate 78, which will be described hereinafter. Reference to FIG. 1- shows that at the end of State 2 a State 3 signal is generated because of the scanning of the dark segment which immediately follows the coded information. This'signal is input to OR Gate 73 so that the stored data in Label Code Storage Circuit 71 and the data from the last scan present in Bit Assembly Register 63 are compared in Label Code Comparator 72.
If the information present in Bit Assembly Register 63 at this instant is the first half of the first scan, there is zero information in Label Code Storage 71, and accordingly no signal is generated in Label Code Comparator 72. However, after the completion of the second half of the first scan of the circular label of FIG. 1, identical information is present in Bit Assembly Register 63 and Label Code Storage 71, and Label Code Comparator 72 generates a compare signal representing the successful comparison of two successive sets of coded information.
The compare signal generated by Label Code Stor age Comparator 72 is presented to AND Gate 75, which also receives a State 9 and a clock (CLK) input. Accordingly, at the end of State 9, that is, when the end ill of the label is indicated by the generation of a State 9 signal as seen in FIGS. 1 and 3, AND Gate 75 applies before a pulse is applied to Shift Register 76 is dependent upon the reliability desired for the system. For example, a compare signal input to AND Gate 75 results from the one successful scan of the circular label of FIG. 1. Accordingly, if more than one scan is desired before actuation of Shift Register 76, Increment Counter 74 will require the input of more than one signal before enabling Shift Register 76. Therefore, if four scans are desired before an incrementation of Shift Register 76 occurs, Increment Counter 74 will be a four-increment counter.
The output from Increment Counter 74 is also used to set a Flip-Flop 77. The output of Shift Register Flip- Flop 77 is applied to AND Gate 78, which also receives a CLK input from Oscillator 32. After Flip'Flop 77 has been set by Counter 74, the CLK signals applied to AND Gate 78 appear on Line 81, which is coupled to the output of AND Gate 78. The output of AND 78 is applied to the Label Code Storage Register'71 as a series of right-shift clock pulses.
Shift Register 76 is an eleven-bit register, and therefore the setting of Flip-Flop 77 allows precisely eleven bits to be injeted into the Label Code Storage Register 71. When register 76 has shifted 11 times it generates an output to reset Flip-Flop 77 and, accordingly, at the end of the eleven clock pulses AND Gate 78 is deactuated.
The eleven pulses from AND Gate 78 during the Set condition of Flip-Flop 77 are applied over Line 81 to AND Gate 79, which also receives an input from Label Code Storage Register 71. The eleven clock pulses which are passed through AND Gate 78 during the Set condition of Flip-Flop 77 are also applied to OR Gate 73 by way of Line 81. Therefore, while these eleven clock pulses are present, the information contained in Label Code Storage 71 is transferred to Data Code Output Buffer 82 through AND Gate 79.
The final transfer of data from Buffer 82 to Data Output Register 83 is effected when AND Gate 84 is actuated. AND Gate 84 is actuated by Read Code (RECO) Flip-Flop 86 and by a DTE signal so that both of these two signals must be received by AND 84 in order to transfer data from Buffet 82 to Output Register 83.
After RECO Flip-Flop 86 has been set by the output from Flip-Flop 77, a signal is present on Line 87 which serves as an input lead to AND Gate 84. The output of AND 84 is coupled to Output Register 83, and therefore data is transferred from Data Output Buffer 82 to the Data Output Register 83 when a Data Transfer Signal (DTE) is applied to Input Line 88 of AND Gate 84. This signal is provided by a Data Transfer Shift Register 89, which is energized by a Box Detector 91. Accordingly, the final transfer of data into Output Register 83 is controlled by Box Detector 91.
Box Detector 91 can be a photoelectric cell, the light beam of which is broken by the container moving in front of the scanning apparatus. In such an operation, the light beam is re-established as the container completes its passage through the field of view of the scanning mechanism. Upon re-establishment of the beam,
Box Detector 91 generates an output pulse which actuates Pulse Generator 92, which then generates a pulse. The pulse from Generator 92 is applied to Lead 93, which serves as an input lead to Data Transfer Shift Register 89 and Clear Control Flip-F lop 94. Data Transfer Shift Register 89 yields an output pulse on three Output Leads 88, 96, and 97. Clear Logic Flip- Flop 94 has an Output Lead 98.
Four events are sequentially initiated by the outputs of Data Transfer Shift Register 89 and Clear Control Flip-Flop 94 when Pulse Generator 92 yields an output pulse in response to the completion of the passage of the container through the field of view of Box Detector 91. (1) Clear Control Flip-Flop 94 generates a Clear All Logic signal which is utilized to clear all circuits within the data processing circuitry except Output Register 83. (2) Data Transfer Shift Register 89 generates a Clear Data Output Register (DOR) signal on Output Line 96 which serves as an input to Data Output Register 83. This signal therefore clears the data out of Output Register 83 in preparation for receiving new data. (3) Data Transfer Register 89 also generates a Data Transfer Enable (DTE) signal on Output Line 88. This signal serves as the second input to AND Gate 84, the output of which is also used as an input to Output Register 83. Accordingly, the presence of the output of AND 84 on the clock input of Register 83 effects the transfer of data from Register 83 to the output circuitry. (4) The signal on Output Terminal 97 of Data Transfer Register 89 serves as an input to Data Ready One-shot 101 so that the one-shot yields a signal to Output Terminal 102. This output signal is used to signal any peripheral equipment that data is available on the output terminals of Drivers 99.
Output Terminal 93 of Pulse Generator 92 is also connected to a Terminal 103 so that the output of Pulse Generator 92 also serves as a Box Ended signal. The Box Ended signal is coupled to one input of AND Gate 104. The other input of AND Gate 104 receives the Read Code (RECO) output present on Output Terminal 87 of RECO Flip-Flop 86 through an Inverter Circuit 107. The output generated by AND Gate 104 is coupled to No-Read One-Shot 108 to yield a No-Read output signal on Output Terminal 109.
The No-Read output of One-Shot 108 is used to indicate that a container has been scanned but the system has been unable to read a label on the container. This can occur because no label was present, because of excessive skew angle of a rectangular label, because of an,
excessively dirty label, or for any other reason a label could not be read. During normal operation of the system, Flip-Flop 86 does not generate an output until a valid scan is indicated at State9. Accordingly, until State 9 is generated, there is a 0 logic pulse on Output Terminal 87. This 0 signal is inverted to a logic 1 condition by Inverter 107 so that an input signal is normally applied to AND Gate 104.
This logic 1 condition continues for all circumstances in which a label is not read, irrespective of the reasons that a label is not read. As a consequence, when the Box Ended signal is generated by Pulse Generator 92 AND Gate 104 is enabled and yields an output which sets No-Read One Shot 108 to yield the no-read output signal on Terminal 109. However, when RECO Flip- Flop 86 is set by Flip-Flop 77, a logic 1 pulse is applied to Inverter 107, which inverts the pulse to a logic 0 condition thus disenabling AND 104 and inhibitihg the generation of a Box Ended signal.
The operation of the entire system is dependent upon the passage of the container in front of the scanning mechanism, and therefore the detection of the container by Box Detector 91 is imperative to the operation of the system. The successful operation of the system is therefore dependent upon the reliable operation of Box Detector 91, as well as the proper functioning of the conveyer upon which the container is moving. The system therefore includes a conveyor-box detector failure indicating circuit which is useful in detecting several malfunctions of the system. The first malfunction is the possibility of the conveyer either inadvertently stopping because of a power failure or of running at too low a speed because of mechanical or electrical control problems. The second possibility of a failure is the failure of the box detector power supply so that the lamps within the box detector are not energized. A bumed-out lamp in the box detector would also render the system inoperative. A broken or otherwise open cable from Box Detector 91 would also result in an inoperative system. Furthermore, Box Detector 91 ineludes a relay which is normally closed when a box or container is within the field of view of the detector. A relay which is jammed or otherwise will not operate therefore would render the system inoperative. The inventive system therefore includes a conveyor-box detector failure indicating system which is useful in detecting all of these failures.
The failure indicator system is shown in FIG. 3b and includes a Set-Reset Flip-Flop 111, the Set input of which is coupled to the output of Box Detector 91. The output of Box Detector 91 is also coupled to a Decode Circuit 112. The output of Flip-Flop 111 is coupled to a timing circuit which includes a Pulse Generator 113 and a Counter 114. The output of Flip-Flop 111 also serves as an input to Decode Circuit 112. The output of Counter 114 is coupled by way of Line 116 to the Reset input of Flip-Flop 111. g
In operation, when Box Detector 91 detects the presence of a box a relay is closed so that a logic I is generated which sets Flip-Flop 1 11. This actuates Pulse Generator 1 13 which generates a string of pulses which are injected into Counter 1 14. Counter 1 14 is set to receive a predetermined number of pulses which is dependent upon the lowest expected speed of the conveyor and the dimension of the largest box expected to be conveyed along the conveyor. If no system failure exists after the container completes its passage through the field of view of Box Detector 94, the box detector is shut off so that no signal is present to the Decode Circuit 112 which therefore deactuates Pulse Generator and Counter 1 14. The counter therefore is then cleared by the Clear All Logic Output of Clear Control Flip- Flop 94, and the system has operated properly. However, if a failure occurs, such as stopping of the conveyor with the box within the field of view of Detector 91, Counter 114 will count beyond the predetermined number and will actuate the Reset input of Flip-Flop 111. When this occurs there is no input to Decode Circuit 112 by way of Input Line 117. Accordingly, if at this point Decode 112 is still receiving an indication from Box Detector 91, an Alarm signal is generated by Decode Circuit 1 12. However, if a change has occurred so that there is no longer an input to Decode Circuit 112 from Box Detector 91, no Alarm signal is generated by the failure indicator circuitry.
A preferred embodiment of State Counter 51 shown in FIG. 4a is illustrated in FIG. 10. The state counter includes a series of AND Gates 121 through which are sequentiallyactuated as the scanned information changes from one state of the label to the next. The state signals that are generated are pulses which are applied as state inputs to the appropriate logic elements throughout the logic circuit diagram shown in FIGS. 4a and 4b and fully described hereinabove.
The state counter can be considered as having an incrementing portion and a clearing portion. The function of the incrementing portion is the generation of pulses to advance the state counter to the next state. The sequence of events must be perfect or the system is cleared and the process started from the beginning. The function of the clear portion is the reinitialization of the state counter and the invalidation of the currently scanned data when state sequencing is not perfeet.
In FIG. 10, AND Gate 121 receives three inputs which are State 0, TD, and DC 2 N, (dark count equal to or greater than a preselected number N.,). A State 0 input is applied to Input Lead 131 of AND Gate 121 in all instances during which the container is being scanned but none of the other states is in existence. The TD input to AND 121 is received from the Sync Circuit 31 of FIG. 4a and represents the reflective capability transitions from dark to light segments as described hereinabove with respect to FIG. 50. The DC 2 N, on Input Lead 148 is received from Dark Count Decoder 153 illustrated in FIG. 15.
Dark Count Decoder 153 receives the dark count pulses from Dark Bar Counter 42 of FIG. 4a as illustrated by Leads 143 and 144. It should be noted that, in reality, more than two input leads are available to Dark Count Decoder 153 so that each specified dark count number will require a separate input line. Only two input leads are shown for convenience in illustration and description. The dark count number N, is selected so that the dark count exceeds a minimum dark bar width to thereby distinguish the dark periphery of the circular label from miscellaneous dark spots on the container or label. The number N, is therefore selected in accordance with a minimum allowable width for the label start segment.
In addition to a preselected count N three other specified counts, N N and N, are utilized. N, represents the minimum width acceptable for one of the narrow segments of the pulse coded information. By using equal segments for the small coded segments and the State 1 and 5 segments, N also represents these two states. N represents the maximum width for the narrow segments of the coded pulse pairs, and N represents the maximum width for the wide segments of the digital pulse pairs. N,, as explained hereinabove, represents the minimum width for the wide dark segment which circumscribes the label and also the maximum selected width for State 4, which is defined by the center of the label. It should be noted that only four preselected pulse counts are required because State 0 and State 3, which are defined by narrow segments, are selected to have a segment width which is equal to the narrow segments of the pulse coded information. If this selection is not made, the State 1 and State 3 segments will have a lesser or greater number depending upon the relative width of these two segments with respect to the narrow segments of the digital pulse pairs. It should also be noted that N is used as the label initiation count as well as the label termination count. This also can be changed and different numbers used for these two counts if so desired. However, any of these changes adds some complexity to Light Count Decoder 152 and Dark Count Decoder 153.
When the three inputs, State 0, TD, and DC 2 N, are simultaneously present at the inputs to AND Gate 121, the AND Gate generates an output pulse which is applied to an OR Gate 154 over Lead 156.-The pulse from AND Gate 121 causes OR Gate 154 to generate an INCREMENT output pulse which is applied to State Change Counter 157. Counter 157 then generates an output pulse which is applied to State Decoder 158 so that Decoder 158 increments one step and changes from State to State 1, and hence an output is present on Output Lead 132. The State 1 output is applied to AND Gate 122 as illustrated by the identical number of Lead 132.
The TL output signals of Synchronization Circuit 131 of FIG. 4a are applied to one of the input leads of AND Gate 122 and the N, s LC s N is applied to Input Lead 147 of AND Gate 122. The light count is received from Light Count Decoder 152 (FIG. which in turn receives inputs from Light Bar Counter 37 of FIG. 4a over Input Leads 141 and 142.
When a valid label is being scanned, and the system has been incremented to Step 1 by Decoder 1538, the presence of a TL pulse and the scanning of the light, narrow segment identified as State 1 in FIG. 1 causes the generation of the proper LC signal which is input to AND Gate 122. The simultaneous presence of these inputs to AND Gate 122 causes it to generate an output pulse which is applied to OR Gate 154 over Lead 159. The input to OR Gate 154 from AND Gate 122 causes the OR Gate to yield an INCREMENT pulse output which is applied to Decoder 158 through State Change Counter 157 so that the decoder increments from State 1 to State 2.
The output pulse of AND Gate 122 applied to Output Lead 159 is also applied to an AND Gate 161 through an Inverter 162. AND Gate 161 also receives the State 1 input from Decoder 158 and the TL signal from Sync Circuit 131. When a State 1 input is available to AND Gate 161, and a pulse output is received from AND Gate 122, the pulse available from AND Gate 122 is inverted to a 0 input by Inverter 162 so that AND Gate 161 is deactuated. However, if a State 1 signal is available to both AND Gates 122 and AND Gates 161 and the proper LC signal is not available to AND 122, a O logic condition is present on Output Terminal 159 of AND 122. This is inverted to a I by Inverter 162 so that AND 161 is actuated and generates an output pulse on Terminal 163 when the TL signal is asserted. This pulse is applied to OR gate 164 which then supplies a pulse to OR Gate 166. The output of OR Gate 166 is used as a CLEAR output pulse which is applied to State Change Counter 157 to actuate State Decoder 158 and return it to the State 0 condition. As a consequence, if the logic circuit improperly reached the State 1 condition because of spurious signals occasioned by spots or dirt on the container or label and the correct light count is not received by AND 122, erroneous readings are avoided.
The State 2 from State Decoder 158 is applied by Input 133 to AND Gate 123 which also receives the TL signal from Sync Circuit 31 and a label (LAB) signal generated in a manner described hereinafter with respect to FIG. 11.
As illustrated in FIG. 1, State 2 is the coded information state, and therefore it is necessary to read eleven bits of data before incrementing Decoder 58 from State 2 to State 3. This is accomplished by use of the LAB signal which is generated as shown in FIG. 11.
In FIG. 11, AND Gate 167 receives the TL pulse outputs from Sync Circuit 31 as well as a State 2 input from Decoder 158. The output of AND 167 is coupled to an OR Gate 168, the output of which is coupled to an ll-bit Counter 169. As a consequence, each transition of the received information from the dark to the light condition causes the generation of an output pulse by AND 167, provided each bit of pulse code information is within prescribed limits as indicated hereinabove. This pulse is applied to Counter 169 through OR Gate 168. After eleven bits have been counted by Counter 169, LAB Flip-Flop 171 is set and generates the LAB signal which is applied to AND Gate 123 of FIG. 10. The LAB signal is also applied to the Reset input of Flip-Flop 171 to thereby reset the flip-flop on the next clock pulse and prepare it for the next input from Counter 169.
Referring again to FIG. 10, upon the generation of the LAB signal by Flip-Flop 171, AND Gate 123 generates an output which is applied by way of Line 173 to OR Gate 154 to effect incrementation of Decoder 158 from Step 2 to Step 3.
The incrementation of Decoder 158 to State 3 applies an input to Input Terminal 134 of AND Gate 124. This AND Gate also receives a TD pulse and is N g DC s N,. The dark count input is received from Dark Count Decoder 153. Accordingly, when the dark count received by Dark Count Decoder 153 is between the two selected values N and N AND Gate 124 yields an output pulse on Terminal 174 which is applied to OR Gate 154 to effect incrementation of Decoder 158 to State 4.
The State 4 signal is applied to Input Terminal 135 of AND Gate 125, which also receives a TL signal and an N s LC 5 N signal. Reference to FIG. 1 shows that State 4 is defined by the center of the label. The two counts N and N are therefore selected so that N is representative of a chord of the center of the label, which is a maximum length of the diameter. N is selected to represent a chord which is a substantial portion of the diameter of the label such as 50 percent or 60 percent. This is done so that a scan of the label which passes through only a very small chord of the center of the label results in a no-read output. This is accomplished because the output of AND is connected to AND Gate 176 via Output Lead 177 and In verter 178. Thus, if the N s LC N signal is not present because the scan count is outside of one of the limits, AND 176 yields an output which recycles State Decocer 158 to State 0 in the same manner as explained hereinabove with respect to AND 161.
It should also be noted that the tolerances of N and N; are selected so that a scan through the label such as the Scan 179 shown in FIG. 1 is not confused with a valid center reading. I
When the correct signals are received by AND 121, it also causes the incrementation of Decoder 158
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3086121 *||Oct 27, 1959||Apr 16, 1963||Gen Electric||Photosensitive code reading system|
|US3106706 *||Aug 8, 1957||Oct 8, 1963||Stewart Warner Corp||Railway car identification system|
|US3543007 *||Oct 10, 1962||Nov 24, 1970||Westinghouse Air Brake Co||Automatic car identification system|
|US3636317 *||Apr 28, 1969||Jan 18, 1972||Charecogn Systems Inc||Machine readable code track|
|US3671718 *||Jul 29, 1970||Jun 20, 1972||Zellweger Uster Ag||Method and apparatus for identifying articles and identification sign therefor|
|US3676645 *||Apr 9, 1970||Jul 11, 1972||James E Harris||Deep field optical label reader including means for certifying the validity of a label reading|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3862400 *||Mar 31, 1972||Jan 21, 1975||Electronics Corp America||Sensing system for bar patterns|
|US3869598 *||Apr 9, 1973||Mar 4, 1975||Svenska Dataregister Ab||Method for reading a data record and a device for performing the method|
|US3987278 *||Oct 18, 1972||Oct 19, 1976||The Gleason Works||Moving object identifying system|
|US4079605 *||May 3, 1976||Mar 21, 1978||Schlage Lock Company||Optical key reader for door locks|
|US4109143 *||Jun 18, 1976||Aug 22, 1978||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Optical reader|
|US4130243 *||Jul 5, 1977||Dec 19, 1978||Stevens Raymond L||Machine readable optical printed symbol format|
|US4409470 *||Jan 25, 1982||Oct 11, 1983||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Narrow-bodied, single-and twin-windowed portable laser scanning head for reading bar code symbols|
|US4493989 *||Apr 28, 1982||Jan 15, 1985||Hampson Alfred A||Container end-code redemption scanning|
|US4593186 *||Oct 20, 1983||Jun 3, 1986||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Portable laser scanning system and scanning methods|
|US4673805 *||Aug 1, 1983||Jun 16, 1987||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Narrow-bodied, single- and twin-windowed portable scanning head for reading bar code symbols|
|US4866257 *||Nov 19, 1987||Sep 12, 1989||Spectra-Physics, Inc.||Bar code scanner and method|
|US5124538 *||Sep 21, 1990||Jun 23, 1992||Accu-Sort Systems, Inc.||Scanner|
|US5395181 *||May 10, 1993||Mar 7, 1995||Microcom Corporation||Method and apparatus for printing a circular or bullseye bar code with a thermal printer|
|US5466921 *||Jun 22, 1992||Nov 14, 1995||Accu-Sort Systems, Inc.||Scanner to combine partial fragments of a complete code|
|US5548107 *||Jul 2, 1993||Aug 20, 1996||Accu-Sort Systems, Inc.||Scanner for reconstructing optical codes from a plurality of code fragments|
|US5714746 *||Mar 3, 1997||Feb 3, 1998||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Terminal with slim scan module with generally orthogonal circuit board arrangement|
|US5808287 *||Jul 12, 1996||Sep 15, 1998||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Narrow-bodied, single-and twin-windowed portable laser scanning head for reading bar code symbols|
|US6206289||Jun 7, 1995||Mar 27, 2001||Accu-Sort Systems, Inc.||Scanner|
|US6669091||Mar 2, 2001||Dec 30, 2003||Accu-Sort Systems, Inc.||Scanner for and method of repetitively scanning a coded symbology|
|US7000838||Dec 23, 2003||Feb 21, 2006||Accu-Sort Systems, Inc.||Method for assembling fragments of scanned data|
|US20040182931 *||Dec 23, 2003||Sep 23, 2004||Charles Lapinski||Method for assembling fragments of scanned data|
|DE3821663A1 *||Jun 27, 1988||Jan 4, 1990||Leuze Electronic Gmbh & Co||Equipment for the reading and decoding of bar-code symbols|
|DE3837657A1 *||Nov 5, 1988||May 10, 1990||Conto Control Herbert Heiden||Package box with a marking field and method and device for reading these markings|
|U.S. Classification||235/436, 235/437, 235/462.18, 235/462.39|
|International Classification||G06K7/10, B61L25/04, B65G47/49|
|Cooperative Classification||B65G47/493, B61L25/041, G06K7/10861|
|European Classification||G06K7/10S9E, B65G47/49A, B61L25/04A|