[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Off topic] Proving an impossibility
miguelimo38 at yandex.ru
Tue Sep 4 05:02:51 EDT 2007
> It depends on arbitrary restrictions on what constitutes an
> (boolean) expression, something that is anathema to
> functional programmers :-) Spot the language:
> while if E
> then S; F
> else False
> do T
> > It reminds me of a paper by Knuth, where he states that
> > "goto" statement is necessary; don't remember the title,
> > however.
> I don't remember needing a goto in Haskell...
Well, for imperative languages, of course.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe