|Publication number||US7522629 B2|
|Application number||US 10/346,030|
|Publication date||Apr 21, 2009|
|Filing date||Jan 16, 2003|
|Priority date||Jan 16, 2003|
|Also published as||US20040141475|
|Publication number||10346030, 346030, US 7522629 B2, US 7522629B2, US-B2-7522629, US7522629 B2, US7522629B2|
|Inventors||Binshi Cao, Stinson Samuel Mathai, Albert Joseph Sawyer|
|Original Assignee||Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (11), Classifications (13), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to communications from base transceiver stations to CDMA (Code Division Multiplexing Arrangement) mobile stations, and more specifically, to arrangements for multiplexing signaling messages and voice frames being transmitted concurrently.
CDMA is rapidly becoming the predominant form of communication between mobile stations and the base transceiver stations that serve these mobile stations. Voice is transmitted to CDMA stations as a series of air-interface frames containing frames spaced at 20 millisecond intervals. The frames may be a full rate frame, a half rate frame, a quarter rate frame, or an eighth rate frame when coding arrangement is such that the minimum size satisfactory frame is used for each frame. Thus, when the direction of the signal toward the mobile station has a voice signal which is predominantly silence or background noise, this signal is transmitted as a series of one-eighth rate frames. When actual speech with a minimum of pauses is being transmitted, it is transmitted predominantly as a series of full rate frames. The advantage of using various sizes of frames is that power sent over the radio waves is conserved, thus maximizing the number of simultaneous conversations which can be supported. The signals from the base transceiver station to the mobile station also are used for conveying signaling messages. Examples of signaling messages are a direction to hand off a conversation, by tuning to a channel from which the mobile station is currently receiving a strong signal, and a neighbor list, which the mobile station uses to check for the strength of received radio signals. Since CDMA does not use a dedicated separate signaling channel, the signaling messages are multiplexed onto the same bit stream as the voice frames. The multiplexer takes a signaling message and cuts it into signaling fragments for combination with lower rate voice frames, producing full rate air-interface frames.
According to the teachings of the prior art, signaling information is multiplexed onto the bit stream by two techniques: blank and burst (the voice frames are simply interrupted by the signaling frames, and are resumed when the signaling message has been transmitted); and dim and burst (full rate frames are forced to half rate and half rate, quarter rate, and eighth rate frames are filled with bits from the signaling message). The result of using blank and burst is that, while the signaling message is transmitted rapidly, there is a substantial degradation in the quality of the voice signal whenever a signaling message is transmitted; the result of using dim and burst is that signaling messages may be delayed excessively. A problem of the prior art is that there is no satisfactory arrangement for minimizing the degradation of the voice signal while still transmitting signaling messages with a minimum of delay.
In the prior art, digital circuit networks are used to interconnect base stations. Frame selectors and vocoders are frequently co-located. A signal multiplexer is used to optionally combine voice packets and signaling packets into combined frames. In order to reduce the delay of transmitting signaling information, a command is sent to the vocoder producing voice packets to limit the voice packets to half rate or less packets. A disadvantage of this arrangement is that the transmission of and response to such a command may incur substantial delay especially in packet voice networks where speech transcoding is remotely located from the base station, and that half rate voice frames introduce some degradation in the quality of speech.
In some cases, for transcoder-free operation, it is not possible to send such a command. In that case, the prior art can blank all full rate voice frames and substitute full rate signaling frames. This introduces substantial degradation in the quality of speech.
A problem of the prior art, therefore, is that there is no satisfactory way of reducing signaling delay without introducing degradation of speech.
The above problems are substantially alleviated in accordance with Applicants' invention, wherein dim and burst is used when half rate, quarter rate, and eighth rate voice frames are being transmitted, and when full rate frames are being transmitted, the transmission of a signaling message is halted for up to N full frames, after which a full frame is dropped. Full signaling frames are inserted instead of full rate voice frames. Applicants have applied simulation to demonstrate that the reduction in the quality of voice transmission using this type of arrangement is relatively modest for a value of N=3. For this value, the delay in transmitting signaling messages appears to be acceptable. This arrangement also produces satisfactory voice transmission on mobile to mobile calls without requiring the far end mobile station to generate only reduced rate voice frames.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of Applicants' invention, up to N consecutive full rate voice frames can be transmitted before a following full rate voice frame is dropped in favor of a signaling frame, and this process can be repeated until some upper limit of deferred signaling frames is reached; thereafter, no more full rate signaling frames are deferred in favor of voice frames. Advantageously, with this arrangement, very long signaling messages can be transmitted in a satisfactory amount of time at the expense of a substantial degradation of the voice quality, while short signaling messages can be transmitted with a minimum reduction of voice quality; thus meeting the needs for transmission of occasional long signaling messages while maintaining voice quality while transmitting short signaling messages.
The reason for waiting P frames in action block 209 is to reduce the interference with the voice message by allowing at least P frames of voice to go through unhampered between messages. This is only required if M frames of blank and burst (signal data only) had been encountered in sending the signaling message or if a high priority signaling message had been transmitted.
Thereafter, following execution of block 209 or the negative result of test 227, test 211 determines whether another high priority signaling message is queued. If so, action block 207 is reentered and a high priority signaling message is transmitted. If no high priority signaling messages are queued (negative result of test 211), then test 213 is used to determine whether any normal priority signaling messages are queued. If not, action block 201 (“wait for signal”) is reentered. If a normal priority signal message is queued, then action block 225 (described hereinafter) is entered.
If the result of test 205, the test of original message priority following the original detection of a request to send a signaling message, finds that the priority of the message to be transmitted is a normal priority, then test 221 is entered. Test 221 determines if the forward voice frame rate of the current voice frame is full rate or other rate (i.e., half rate, quarter rate, or one eighth rate). If the current voice frame rate is a full rate, then in accordance with the principles of Applicants' invention, the signaling message is held up for up to N forward full rate frames or until a lower rate frame is to be sent whichever comes first (action block 223). When a lower rate frame is to be sent or N full rate frames have been sent, then the signaling message starts to be sent (action block 225). In this action, mixed mode (voice plus signal) frames are sent if the voice frame is lower than full rate. If the voice frame is full rate, then a full rate signal only frame is sent (blank and burst). This procedure is repeated with successive voice frames until the full signaling message is sent. A simple way of describing the actions of block 225 is to say that whenever a full rate frame is to be sent, a full signaling frame is substituted; when a voice frame that is less than full rate is to be sent, that voice frame is sent and the rest of the space in a frame is occupied by a portion of the signaling message. Following action block 225, test 227 determines whether the last M frames were sent in the blank and burst mode, i.e., were sent with no voice signal. If so, then action block 209 (wait P frames) is entered and subsequent actions are executed as previously described. If the last M frames were not consecutive blank and burst frames, then action block 211, previously described, is entered.
Action block 223 can be executed in one of two ways: the count can start following the result of test 221 or the count can be continuous so that if a series of full frames had already been transmitted prior to the detection of a signaling message, that action block 225 is entered more rapidly. The advantage of the second approach is that signaling messages are transmitted with less delay. The advantage of the first approach is that there is a chance that a lower amount of voice degradation is introduced.
Exact values of M, N, and P await determination based on field experience. However, based on simulations, the following values appear to be good tentative numbers: M=1, N=3, P=3. (Experimental tests may indicate other preferred values of P between 1 and 7.)
The above description is of one preferred embodiment of Applicants' invention. Other embodiments will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. The invention is limited only by the attached claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4813040 *||Oct 31, 1986||Mar 14, 1989||Futato Steven P||Method and apparatus for transmitting digital data and real-time digitalized voice information over a communications channel|
|US4914650 *||Dec 6, 1988||Apr 3, 1990||American Telephone And Telegraph Company||Bandwidth allocation and congestion control scheme for an integrated voice and data network|
|US5612955 *||Mar 21, 1995||Mar 18, 1997||Motorola, Inc.||Mobile radio with transmit command control and mobile radio system|
|US5721732 *||Oct 31, 1995||Feb 24, 1998||Motorola, Inc.||Method of transmitting user information and overhead data in a communication device having multiple transmission modes|
|US5740531 *||Jul 7, 1995||Apr 14, 1998||Fujitsu Limited||Digital mobile telephone communication method, communication channel switching method, and mobile station and base station for implementing same methods|
|US5909434 *||May 31, 1996||Jun 1, 1999||Qualcomm Incorporated||Bright and burst mode signaling data transmission in an adjustable rate wireless communication system|
|US6144653 *||Jun 10, 1998||Nov 7, 2000||Telefonakteibolaget Lm Ericsson||Method for communicating in a wireless communication system|
|US6252865 *||Oct 2, 1998||Jun 26, 2001||Qualcomm, Inc.||Methods and apparatuses for fast power control of signals transmitted on a multiple access channel|
|US6781971 *||Mar 29, 2000||Aug 24, 2004||Qualcomm Incorporated||System and method for prioritizing traffic channel messages|
|US6985866 *||Oct 1, 2001||Jan 10, 2006||Fujitsu Limited||Signaling communication method of mobile communications system|
|US20010022782 *||Feb 13, 2001||Sep 20, 2001||Ville Steudle||Reducing interference in inter-frequency measurement|
|U.S. Classification||370/442, 370/337, 370/278|
|International Classification||H04W84/04, H04W72/12, H04B7/212, H04L12/56, H04B7/26|
|Cooperative Classification||H04W84/042, H04W72/1242, H04W72/1263, H04B7/264|
|Apr 1, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CAO, BINSHI;MATHAI, STINSON SAMUEL;SAWYER, ALBERT JOSEPH;REEL/FRAME:013910/0136;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030221 TO 20030310
|Feb 25, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.;REEL/FRAME:022305/0904
Effective date: 20081101
|Sep 28, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 7, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.;REEL/FRAME:030510/0627
Effective date: 20130130
|Oct 9, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., NEW JERSEY
Effective date: 20140819
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG;REEL/FRAME:033949/0531