|Publication number||US4022855 A|
|Application number||US 05/558,741|
|Publication date||May 10, 1977|
|Filing date||Mar 17, 1975|
|Priority date||Mar 17, 1975|
|Publication number||05558741, 558741, US 4022855 A, US 4022855A, US-A-4022855, US4022855 A, US4022855A|
|Inventors||David P. Hamblen|
|Original Assignee||Eastman Kodak Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (132), Classifications (32)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to methods for preparing a plastic lens element having a gradient index of refraction. More specifically, the method involves introducing first and second monomer-containing compositions, each having a different index of refraction, into a centrifugal mold in accordance with a controlled procedure whereby a transparent element is produced which has a continuous gradient in refractive index extending in a direction radially outward from the rotational axis of the centrifugal mold.
The use of plastic materials, instead of glass, in the manufacture of various types of optical and other lens-like media has many potential advantages. Generally, the plastics are less expensive than the glass used to form an optical element. In addition, finishing operations such as polishing and the like usually necessary with respect to glass optical elements are substantially avoided with respect to molded plastic lenses.
It is well known in the art to produce single index of refraction optical lenses from a cross-linkable monomer that is polymerized and solidified by heat curing in its mold. In this technique, it is customary to provide a stationary injection mold having optical quality mold faces supported in spaced relation by a deformable sidewall. Since these monomers frequently shrink volumetrically when polymerized, the faces of the mold must be moved together at a rate corresponding to the shrinkage of the monomer in passing into the polymerized phase (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,542,386, to Beattie).
In addition to injection molding, it is well known to mold various polymeric objects by centrifugal casting, such as, for example, parabolic mirrors from epoxy resins and hydrogel contact lenses from monomer mixtures capable of three dimensional polymerization. By this technique, contact lenses with a single index of refraction have been prepared in an open mold cavity having a concavely curved bottom surface which is rotated about an upright axis, traverse of that surface. There is obtained a shape-retaining polymer body having a convex bottom surface conforming to the mold surface, and a concave top surface, formed by the rotation of the open mold, which has approximately the shape of a paraboloid (see, for example, U.S. Pat. 3,660,545, to Wichterle). Thus, in this method, the case monomer is shaped not only by centrifugal force, gravity and surface tension, but also by contact with the concave mold.
In the aforementioned centrifugal casting technique, the convex surface of the monomeric liquid is deformed to some extent by surface tension in contacting the concave mold surface. Also, the concave surface of the monomeric liquid, which is exposed to the open air, is limited in the shapes it may assume. To overcome these limitations, processes have been proposed to envelope the cast monomeric liquid with several shaping liquids of differing weights so as to prevent the cast liquid from contacting the wall of the rotating molding container (see for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,691,263, to Stoy et al.). Depending upon choice of liquids, the concave surface of the monomeric liquid can assume shapes other than the customary paraboloid shape.
The foregoing examples of prior art techniques for fabricating plastic lenses have the desirable features of simplicity and economy. However, it has been found difficult to obtain plastic materials that possess physical and mechanical properties suitable for forming optical elements of precise configuration. Specifically, if the lens is formed of a material having a uniform index of refraction, the optical surface of the plastic material must be precisely curved to produce the desired optical properties. The need for precision of curvature diminishes as the index of refraction is made to vary across the optical face, since, in that instance, curvature of the surface is not solely responsible for the desired deflection of incident light.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,485,556 discloses a prior art technique for making a multifocal, plastic, opthalmic lens with a refractive index gradient. This method essentially embodies the sequential layering of one monomeric composition atop another in a stationary upright mold assembly so that the two monomers diffuse by gravity across their liquid interface to establish a longitudinal zone of refractive gradient. Typically, the diffusion step is closely controlled under isothermal conditions to obtain a predetermined diffusion rate and a predetermined depth and degree of diffusion. Diffusion is arrested at the desired point by polymerizing the monomeric liquids.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,718,383 discloses another method for obtaining a gradient refractive index which involves diffusing an organic diluent into a transparent solid polymeric matrix having an optical axis. The organic diluent possesses an index of refraction which differs from that of the polymeric matrix; and when the diluent is disturbed by diffusion into the matrix, it forms a continuous gradient in refractive index across the matrix, perpendicular to the optical axis.
While the prior art discussed above shows that plastic optical elements having a gradient index of refraction have been prepared by various techniques, the elements made in accordance with these prior art techniques suffer from aberrations and have only limited apertures with half fields of a very few degrees. Accordingly, an improved method for making plastic, gradient-refractive-index, optical elements, with improved aberration and half field characteristics would be a substantial advance in the art.
I have found that the problems associated with the aberrations and limited apertures characteristic of elements manufactured in accordance with prior art tachniques can be surmounted by combining certain features of the previously separate and seemingly incongruous arts of centrifugal casting and stationary diffusion of optical grade polymerization compositions. With this advance, a single plastic element having a gradient index of refraction can be produced to replace a number of elements in a lens array, thus providing substantial savings in the manufacture of lens systems.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of my invention a mold cavity is filled over a period of time with a mixture which contains at least copolymerizable monomer compositions and which varies as to the volumetric ratio of those compositions during the filling period. Each monomer composition includes a monomer which has an index of refraction that differs from that of the other composition. In combination, the monomers form a portion of the mixture in which the gradient index of refraction varies in accordance with the ratio of the component compositions in the polymerization mixture. During at least a part of the filling step the mold is rotated about an axis of rotation to generate centrifugal forces which advance the formation of a gradient index of refraction in the polymerization mixture. When the mold has been filled and the gradient index of refraction has been sufficiently advanced by rotation, the mixture is polymerized to form an optical element having a gradient index of refraction in a direction generally radial to the axis rotation of the mold.
Another more specific embodiment of the method utilizes two individual molding halves formed of a flexible, resilient material and mounted within a mold carrier. At least one wall of the resulting mold is constructed to permit ultraviolet light to enter the molding cavity. A first composition, including a monomer such as allyl diethylene glycol 2-carbonate mixed with a polymerization catalyst and an ultraviolet sensitizer, is introduced into the mold cavity. The mold is then rotated at a speed sufficient to force the first composition outwardly by centrifugal force; and a second composition, including a monomer, such as diallyl phthalate, which has an index of refraction differing from that in the first composition is introduced into the mold near the axis of rotation in a manner avoiding diluting the first composition. The rotational speed of the mold is then reduced to allow the two compositions to diffuse. After a predetermined period of diffusion, polymerization of the monomers is initiated by an ultraviolet radiation exposure. Finally the mixture is completely polymerized, for example in an oven, to produce a hard, shaped transparent optical element having a gradient refractive index.
A principal object of this invention is to provide a method for making a plastic, gradient-refractive-index optical element which provides improved optical correction and more useful aperture and half field.
The invention, and its objects and advantages, will become more apparent in the detailed description of the preferred embodiment presented below.
In the subsequent detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, wherein the same reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawing and in which:
FIG. 1 is an exploded, sectional view illustrating a molding device useful in practice of the present invention;
FIGS. 2a-c are cross-sectional views illustrating preferred embodiments of the lens molds useful with the molding device of FIG. 1;
FIGS. 3a-f are exploded cross-sectional views illustrating several preparatory matrices for making the molds such as shown in FIGS. 2a-c; and
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of another apparatus useful in practice of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a mold carrier consisting of carrier base 4 and carrier cap 2 secured thereto by means of mounting screws 6. The carrier base 4 also comprises at one end a recess 8 for receiving and securing, by means of a set screw 10, a drive shaft for rotating the mold carrier on axis 22. The recess 8 is centered on the axis of rotation 22 so that a centrifugal force is established about that axis when the molding carrier is rotated. The carrier base 4 and cap 2 commonly define an interior sidewall 12, and an opening 14 is provided in upper interior wall 16 of cap 2 to allow for the introduction of ultraviolet radiation. Suitable transparent material may be provided in lieu of opening 14. Sidewall 12, upper interior wall 16 and a bottom wall 18 define a cylindrical mold carrier cavity 20 which is configured to receive the molds of FIGS. 2A, 2B or 2C and support such a mold with its axis of rotation aligned with axis 22.
FIGS. 2a-c are cross-sectional views of several preferred embodiments of rubber molds for casing a gradient-refractive-index lens according to the method of this invention. These embodiments are exemplary of the wide variety of molds useful according to the present invention rather than as indicating the only useful configurations. The molds shown in these Figures include lids 42', 42" and 42'" resting on bases 40', 40" and 40'" respectively. The molds in FIGS. 2a and 2b are formed of rubber having an optically smooth surface on portions defining the mold cavity. The mold of FIG. 2a is configured to cast a flat lens, while FIG. 2b shows a mold for casting a positive meniscus lens. FIG. 2c illustrates a mold cavity for casting a flat lens between two glass plates 46 and 48 having appropriate optically smooth surfaces.
The mold illustrated in FIG. 2a can be fabricated by use of the matrices such as illustrated in FIGS. 3a and 3b. FIG. 3a illustrates a plexiglass matrix for casting the base 40' of the mold shown in FIG. 2a and includes a generally annular top portion 60a having a cylindrical cavity 61a and a bottom portion 62a. A screw clearance hole 63a passes through bottom portion 62a and a threaded tap hole 65a concentric therewith is located in top portion 60a to receive screws 64a. An optically polished raised surface 66a is located on the upper surface of base 62a and centered within the cavity 61a.
Lid 42' of the mold shown in FIG. 2a can be fabricated in the plexiglass matrix illustrated in FIG. 3b. In a manner similar to that discussed above, top 60b is fastened to base 62b by screws 64b passing through the screw clearance holes 63b and engaging the threaded tap holes 65b. The upper surface of base 62b is optically polished and molds a corresponding optical surface on lid 42' in FIG. 2a facing downward in molding cavity 44.
Mold materials for casting in the plexiglass matrices of FIGS. 3a and 3b can be ceramic or other materials to which the monomers will not adhere, silicone rubber being particularly useful. No treatment other than a blast of clean air is necessary to clean the molds under normal working conditions and then they can be subsequently reused. It is desirable as hereafter shown to cast the lid 42' of a transparent silicone rubber to enable ultraviolet radiation to pass therethrough. The base 40' can be cast from an opaque rubber material.
The rubber molds 40", 42" shown in FIG. 2b can be cast from the plexiglass matrices such as shown in FIG. 3c and 3d. Referring to FIG. 3c, in manner similar to that discussed in conjunction with FIG. 3a, top 60c is fastened to base 62c by screws 64c passing through the screw clearance holes 63c and engaging the threaded cap holes 65c. In like manner, in FIG. 3d, top 60d is fastened to base 62d by screws 64d passing through the screw clearance holes 63d and engaging the threaded cap holes 65d. Also in like manner, referring to FIG. 3e, top 60e is fastened to base 62e by screws 64e passing through the screw clearance holes 63e and engaging the threaded cap holes 65e. Also, in FIG. 3f, top 60f is fastened to base 62f by screws 64f passing through the screw clearance holes 63f and engaging the threaded cap holes 65f. It is to be noted that a positive glass lens 68c of proper radius is utilized to provide the silicone rubber mold 40" with optical surface quality to form the front surface of the meniscus lens. Similarly a negative planoconcave glass lens 70d is inset in recess 72d of the matrix shown in FIG. 3d to provide the silicone rubber mold 42" with optical surface quality to form the rear surface of the meniscus lens. The lens 70d can be adjusted by suitable means (not shown) acting by way of an access hole 74d to adjust the configuration of mold 42" and thus the thickness and focal length of the final lens.
Base 40'" of the mold shown in FIG. 2c is cast from the matrix illustrated in FIG. 3e wherein glass disk 46 rests without attachment on raised surface 66e. When the rubber molding material hardens in place, glass disk 46 is secured therein as shown in FIG. 2c and is removable with the base 40'" from the form. FIG. 3f illustrates the matrix for casting the lid 42'" of the mold in FIG. 2c. The glass disk 48 is removable with the lid 42'" from the matrix as described with regard to element 46 of matrix 62e. Disk 48 has a small center hole through which hypodermic insertion of the monomer compositions can be effected. To minimize the effect of a sprue impression during molding of the lens, the center hole is filled with a silicone rubber plug 50 whose molding surface is in line and parallel to glass disk 48. The soft rubber plug 50 allows for easy penetration of the hypodermic needle and closes without making a large sprue impression on the center surface of the plastic lens forming beneath the plug.
Having described the apparatus illustrated in FIGS. 1-3, the method steps involved in production of plastic optical elements utilized in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention will now be described.
Initially the molded silicone rubber parts previously described are combined into the molds illustrated in FIGS. 2a, 2b, and 2c. Since mold carrier and an inserted mold are rotated at speeds up to 3500 rpm, a good seal is necessary along the faces where the lid and the base of the mold are in contact to prevent leakage of injected monomer compositions. The adhesion between the silicone rubber materials makes a good gasket when the closure of carrier cap 2 onto carrier base 4 squeezes the silicone rubber faces tightly together. The soft rubber of the lids 42', 42", and 42'" allows for easy penetration of a hypodermic needle in a later step and closes without making a large sprue imperfection on the center surface of the lens thereunder.
After the lid and base of the mold insert are joined forming a molding cavity therebetween, and after the joined mold is settled into the cylindrical mold carrier cavity 20 of the mold carrier, a first copolymerizable monomer composition is introduced into the molding cavity. This may be done before the lid is secured onto the base or by hypodermic insertion through the lid in the aforementioned manner. The monomer utilized in the composition desirably, is one which, during curing, becomes increasingly viscous, then gels uniformly throughout the resinous mass, and after progressive hardening forms a cross-linked polymer. The cured polymer should have high resistance to warping and distortion, to impact, and to abrasion. Allyl diethylene glycol 2-carbonate has been found to meet these requirements. A catalyst such as benzoyl peroxide and an ultraviolet sensitizer such as benzophenone are also provided in the monomer composition to be inserted into the mold cavity. It is to be noted that this type of monomer may shrink when passing through the curing phase into a solidified polymer, and the soft silicone rubber lid and base can be compressed to allow the sides and faces of the mold to be moved together to compensate for the shrinkage.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the mold carrier is rotated about its axis 22 at a high speed, for example 3500 rpm, and the second copolymerizable monomer composition is hypodermically injected into the mold cavity during such rotation. Such high speed rotation centrifugally forces the first monomer composition radially outward against the walls of the mold cavity before and during the insertion of the second monomer composition into the mold cavity. In this way, uncontrolled dilution of the first monomer by the second monomer is prevented at the moment of injection. The two monomers respectively utilized in the first and second copolymerization compositions should be mutually soluble, chemically compatible and capable of forming copolymers. Obviously to establish a gradient index of refraction the two monomers should have different indices of refraction when polymerized. I have found diallyl phthalate when mixed with a catalyst and sensitizer such as described above in connection with the first introduced polymerization composition to be suited for use in the second introduced composition. Other mixtures of different first and second compositions can be used, but the diallyl phthalate-allyl diethylene glycol 2-carbonate system provides a suitable index of refraction range for most lens designs.
A partial listing of other monomeric materials for the second composition and their refractive indices for diffusion into the allyl diethylene glycol 2-carbonate of the first composition may be found in Table I hereinbelow.
TABLE I______________________________________Monomeric Materials for the Second Monomer CompositionName Index of Refraction______________________________________dibutyl phthalate 1.4926vinyl acetate 1.5129methyl methacrylate 1.4913methyl methacrylate 1.492methylthio-2-norbornylmethylmethacrylate 1.5492-norbornylmethyl methacrylate 1.519o-chlorostyrene 1.602styrene 1.59+______________________________________
After the second monomer composition is injected, the speed of the molding carrier and the associated mold is reduced to a predetermined level, for example 1000 rpm. The rotation is continued over a predetermined period of time, for example, 2 hours, to allow the desired degree of diffusion of one monomer into the other. The rate of diffusion can be adjusted over a wide range by exposing the monomers to ultraviolet radiation through the U.V. transparent lid. That is since the U.V. exposure in conjunction with the sensitizer mixed with the monomers induces increasing viscosity and ultimately gelation of the monomer compositions, such exposure provides a means for the mold operator to selectively vary the gradient profile.
The refractive index can be influenced also by preliminary ultraviolet exposure of the first monomer located toward the outside of the lens mold. For example, by providing a U.V. exposure through a photographic mask having an outwardly decreasing density profile, the initial viscosity can be caused to increase in the direction from the inside of the mold cavity outward to the edge. The second monomer is therefore caused to diffuse against a fluid with an increasing variation in viscosity and the gradient index profile is changed from that obtained in free diffusions.
Finally, after continued gelation of the monomer compositions, the rotation of the mold carrier is stopped and the rubber mold is removed from the cavity 20 and placed in a programmable oven for polymerization of the diffused monomers. The resulting product is a hard, transparent plastic optical element with optical quality surfaces which when in the form of a single-element optical lens is well corrected with a useful aperture and half field, and minimal aberrations.
An alternative to the embodiment of the invention described above, involves feeding two copolymerization monomer compositions of the type previously described, simultaneously but at varying proportional rates, into the rotating mold as shown schematically in FIG. 4. Referring to FIG. 4, a pressure source 82 is shown in communication with a supply chamber 84 of a first monomer composition and a supply chamber 86 of a second monomer composition. Variable flow rate control valves 90 allow a polymerization mixture of the two monomer compositions to flow under pressure at predetermined rates, which vary in relative proportion over the filling period, into mixing chamber 88. That is, while the mold is rotating at a speed, e.g., in the range of 300-1000 rpm, the mixture is first injected into the center of the rotating mold cavity 44" by way of needle injector 92 with a first ratio of flow between the two monomer compositions. Thereafter, with the mold still rotating, control valves 90 are continuously, or periodically, adjusted during the filling period so that the relative percentage concentration of the monomers varies radially within the mold cavity 44". After an overall U.V. exposure, as described below, the mold is removed and heated in an oven in accordance with a program such as is described with respect to Example 1 so that an element having a continuously varying index of refraction is formed within mold cavity 44". In this embodiment the refractive gradient occurs rapidly, without waiting for the diffusion of the two monomers.
Various non-limiting embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by the following examples.
A lens with plane parallel optical surfaces is produced in accordance with the present invention by preparing a first monomer composition of Allyl Diethylene Glycol 2-carbonate, 4 wt.% Benzoyl Peroxide catalyst and 1 wt.% Benzophenone U.V. sensitizer. A mold cavity such as shown in FIG. 2A is filled with the first monomer composition to 1/2 of its total volume or about 0.10 cc. A second monomer composition is prepared from Diallyl Phthalate and the same quantities of Benzoyl Peroxide and Benzophenone. Then the mold is rotated at 3500 rpm as the second monomer composition is hypodermically injected into the center of the mold cavity through its lid. Rotation of the mold is then decreased to about 1000 rpm and diffusion of the two monomers proceeds for two hours. After two hours of continued diffusion under U.V. exposure from a 100 watt U.V. lamp partially focused upon the mold, gelation of the monomer compositions results, at which time the rubber mold is removed from the mold carrier and placed in a programmable oven for polymerization of the diffused monomers. The oven is programmed to the following schedule: (1) raise the temperature gradually over a period of two hours from 25° C. to 115° C.; (2) hold the oven at 115° C. for two hours; (3) turn off the oven and allow the oven to cool at its own rate to room temperature. Then the lens specimen can be removed from the mold.
The resulting flat disk is hard and transparent, with optical quality surfaces having a radial distribution of refractive index.
A second lens with plane parallel optical surfaces is prepared in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention by first premixing the two monomer compositions of Example 1 in a ratio of 85 vol. % first monomer composition and 15 vol. % second monomer composition. This first mixture has an index of refraction upon polymerization equivalent to n=1.51. This first mixture is injected into 1/2 the volume of the mold cavity or about 0.10 ml. A second mixture comprising 70 vol. % first monomer composition and 30 vol. % second monomer composition is prepared, which of itself yields a refractive index of n=1.52. While the mold is rotating as in Example 1, the second mixture is injected into the center of the mold cavity until the cavity is filled. Diffusion and polymerization are continued as in Example 1. The result is a hard, transparent flat lens.
A positive meniscus lens is prepared in a mold such as illustrated in FIG. 2b which is filled with two monomer compositions or mixtures according to the method of either Examples 1 or 2. Diffusion occurred for 195 minutes at 1000 rpm and continued at the same speed for 60 more minutes under U.V. exposure. Further steps followed Example 1.
Another positive meniscus lens is prepared in accordance with the present invention by first selecting a variable density mask that corresponds generally to the area on the mold lid (FIG. 2b) subtended by the rear surface of the meniscus lens. The photographic mask is constructed so as to have a decrease in density radially outward from the center of the molding cavity with the center itself being opaque to U.V. transmission. Decreasing density in the mask corresponds generally to the volume of the first monomer composition when the molding carrier is rotated and the monomer is forced outward toward the walls of the molding cavity. The molding cavity is filled with two monomer compositions as in Example 1. Then the photographic mask is placed over and adjacent to the mold lid while the mold rotates at 1000 rpm with ultraviolet exposure for 30 minutes. Then diffusion continues for 40 minutes without U.V. exposure. Next the mask is removed and the monomer compositions are given an overall U.V exposure for 30 minutes while continuing to rotate the mold at 1000 rpm. Polymerization by heat according to Example 1 follows. The result is a positive meniscus lens showing minimum distortion across full aperture.
It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that various optical design requirements can be satisfied by adjusting the index difference between the first and second introduced monomer compositions, e.g., by premixing such compositions to achieve a desired maximum (center lens) index and minimum (outer edge) index respectively for the second and first introduced compositions.
The invention has been described in considerable detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2423583 *||Oct 20, 1941||Jul 8, 1947||Polaroid Corp||Process of forming hard resinous surfaces on organic plastics, and product thereof|
|US3083552 *||Dec 21, 1959||Apr 2, 1963||Carlson Charles W||Method for forming cased glassware|
|US3256373 *||Aug 17, 1962||Jun 14, 1966||Horst Robert L||Method of forming a cylindrical dielectric lens|
|US3408429 *||Jan 4, 1965||Oct 29, 1968||Ceskoslovenska Akademie Ved||Method for centrifugal casting a contact lens|
|US3486808 *||Mar 14, 1966||Dec 30, 1969||Bausch & Lomb||Gradient refractive index optical lenses|
|US3557261 *||Oct 5, 1967||Jan 19, 1971||Ceskoslovenska Akademie Ved||Method of centrifugally casting layered contact lenses|
|US3699089 *||Sep 25, 1968||Oct 17, 1972||Ceskoslovenska Akademie Ved||Anhydrous sparingly cross-linked hydrophilic copolymers|
|US3864143 *||Jun 22, 1972||Feb 4, 1975||Armstrong Cork Co||Chemical embossing using ultraviolet radiation|
|US3872042 *||Aug 28, 1973||Mar 18, 1975||Buckbee Mears Co||Plastic lenses and method of making same|
|US3953620 *||Dec 6, 1974||Apr 27, 1976||Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated||Producing integrated optical circuits|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4161065 *||Oct 7, 1977||Jul 17, 1979||John Gigante||Method for making readily reshapable dentures|
|US4166088 *||Feb 13, 1978||Aug 28, 1979||Neefe Charles W||Method of making high quality plastic lenses|
|US4222835 *||May 25, 1978||Sep 16, 1980||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||In depth curing of resins induced by UV radiation|
|US4245890 *||Jan 2, 1979||Jan 20, 1981||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Gradient index of refraction for missile seekers|
|US4248807 *||May 3, 1979||Feb 3, 1981||John Gigante||Method for making a denture|
|US4374189 *||Feb 2, 1981||Feb 15, 1983||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Process of making a holographic optical article|
|US4451412 *||Sep 29, 1982||May 29, 1984||Thomson-Csf||Process for producing diffracting phase structures|
|US4576850 *||Jul 20, 1978||Mar 18, 1986||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Shaped plastic articles having replicated microstructure surfaces|
|US4582655 *||Nov 25, 1983||Apr 15, 1986||Eastman Kodak Company||Production of optical element with a varying refractive index|
|US4582885 *||Dec 18, 1979||Apr 15, 1986||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Shaped plastic articles having replicated microstructure surfaces|
|US4637904 *||Nov 14, 1983||Jan 20, 1987||Rohm And Haas Company||Process for molding a polymeric layer onto a substrate|
|US4641927 *||Mar 24, 1982||Feb 10, 1987||Dyonics, Inc.||Chromatic aberration corrected gradient index lens system|
|US4666249 *||Aug 14, 1985||May 19, 1987||Sola U.S.A. Inc.||Surface-treated contact lens and method of producing|
|US4666640 *||Feb 13, 1986||May 19, 1987||Neefe Charles W||Method of making a spin cast gradient light absorbing contact lens|
|US4668558 *||Jan 6, 1986||May 26, 1987||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Shaped plastic articles having replicated microstructure surfaces|
|US4701288 *||Jun 5, 1985||Oct 20, 1987||Bausch & Lomb Incorporated||Method of making articles of dissimilar polymer compositions|
|US4732715 *||Sep 20, 1985||Mar 22, 1988||Bausch & Lomb Incorporated||Manufacture of polymeric contact lenses|
|US4753704 *||Jun 30, 1986||Jun 28, 1988||Loctite Corporation||Process using light and light activated adhesive compositions to secure light opaque end caps to fluorescent tubes|
|US4798694 *||Aug 6, 1986||Jan 17, 1989||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Method for producing composite materials|
|US4906675 *||Feb 10, 1987||Mar 6, 1990||Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd.||Active energy ray-curable composition|
|US4937118 *||Jul 14, 1989||Jun 26, 1990||Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Inc.||Active energy ray-curable composition|
|US4988274 *||Dec 21, 1988||Jan 29, 1991||Dresser Industries, Inc.||Method and apparatus for producing an optical element|
|US5011633 *||Dec 11, 1989||Apr 30, 1991||Sunsoft Lenses||Method of controlling the thickness of cast lenses|
|US5040961 *||Oct 4, 1989||Aug 20, 1991||Eastman Kodak Company||Apparatus for manufacturing aspherically shaped small lenses|
|US5066431 *||Apr 20, 1990||Nov 19, 1991||Briggs Charles R||Method of making toric contact lenses|
|US5095079 *||Jun 26, 1990||Mar 10, 1992||Essilor International Cie Generale D'optique||Method and device for producing a graded index polymer|
|US5122314 *||Dec 4, 1990||Jun 16, 1992||Eastman Kodak Company||Method for fabricating grin lens elements by spin molding|
|US5143659 *||Aug 16, 1991||Sep 1, 1992||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for manufacturing aspherically shaped small lenses|
|US5152787 *||Dec 19, 1990||Oct 6, 1992||Eastman Kodak Company||Intraocular gradient-index lenses used in eye implantation|
|US5159495 *||Dec 11, 1990||Oct 27, 1992||Eastman Kodak Company||Graded index optical elements and catadioptric optical systems|
|US5244371 *||Jan 27, 1992||Sep 14, 1993||Eastman Kodak Company||Apparatus for fabricating grin lens elements by spin molding|
|US5300391 *||Sep 17, 1991||Apr 5, 1994||Xerox Corporation||Field assisted processes for preparing imaging members|
|US5364256 *||Jan 13, 1994||Nov 15, 1994||Ophthalmic Research Group International, Inc.||Apparatus for the production of plastic lenses|
|US5405556 *||Apr 13, 1993||Apr 11, 1995||National Science Council||Process of fabricating light-focusing plastic optical elements|
|US5415816 *||Dec 6, 1991||May 16, 1995||Q2100, Inc.||Method for the production of plastic lenses|
|US5514214 *||Sep 20, 1993||May 7, 1996||Q2100, Inc.||Eyeglass lens and mold spin coater|
|US5516010 *||Sep 1, 1994||May 14, 1996||Sherwood Medical Company||Sanitary speculum for tympanic thermometer probe|
|US5516468 *||Nov 14, 1994||May 14, 1996||Q2100, Inc.||Method for the production of plastic lenses|
|US5529728 *||Aug 18, 1992||Jun 25, 1996||Q2100, Inc.||Process for lens curing and coating|
|US5554702 *||Dec 8, 1994||Sep 10, 1996||The University Of Connecticut||Coated polycarbonate and method for making the same|
|US5629800 *||Jun 5, 1995||May 13, 1997||Eastman Kodak Company||Gradial zone lens and method of fabrication|
|US5807906 *||Feb 27, 1996||Sep 15, 1998||Essilor International-Compagnie Generale D'optique||Process for obtaining a transparent article with a refractive index gradient|
|US5833367 *||Nov 12, 1996||Nov 10, 1998||Trutek, Inc.||Tympanic thermometer probe cover|
|US5888440 *||Feb 26, 1993||Mar 30, 1999||Norstone, Inc.||Method for manufacturing mixing impeller|
|US5928575 *||Jun 14, 1996||Jul 27, 1999||Q2100, Inc.||Methods for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US5967992 *||Jun 3, 1998||Oct 19, 1999||Trutex, Inc.||Radiometric temperature measurement based on empirical measurements and linear functions|
|US5976423 *||Jun 14, 1996||Nov 2, 1999||Q2100, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US5980451 *||Jan 12, 1998||Nov 9, 1999||Sherwood Services Ag||Disposable speculum with membrane bonding ring|
|US6001066 *||Jun 3, 1998||Dec 14, 1999||Trutek, Inc.||Tympanic thermometer with modular sensing probe|
|US6022498 *||Apr 19, 1996||Feb 8, 2000||Q2100, Inc.||Methods for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US6027672 *||Dec 31, 1997||Feb 22, 2000||Lightpath Technologies, Inc.||Method of producing large polymer optical blanks with predictable axil refractive index profile|
|US6030117 *||Jun 3, 1997||Feb 29, 2000||Trutek, Inc.||Tympanic thermometer probe cover|
|US6042266 *||Mar 30, 1998||Mar 28, 2000||Trutek, Inc.||Tympanic thermometer probe cover|
|US6042756 *||Jan 22, 1996||Mar 28, 2000||Novartis Ag||Process for the manufacture of moulded articles that are partly colored or have regions of different colors|
|US6071441 *||Mar 12, 1998||Jun 6, 2000||Asahi Glass Company Ltd.||Method of manufacturing distributed refractive index optical fiber|
|US6086999 *||Jun 12, 1997||Jul 11, 2000||Boston Optical Fiber, Inc.||Method for producing a graded index plastic optical material|
|US6123454 *||Jun 11, 1999||Sep 26, 2000||Trutek, Inc.||Tympanic thermometer disposable probe cover with further stretching prevention structure|
|US6171528||Nov 10, 1998||Jan 9, 2001||Q2100, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US6174465||Nov 11, 1998||Jan 16, 2001||Q2100, Inc.||Methods for eyeglass lens curing using ultaviolet light|
|US6186959||Mar 12, 1999||Feb 13, 2001||Trutek, Inc.||Tympanic thermometer with modular sensing probe|
|US6200124||Nov 12, 1998||Mar 13, 2001||Q1200||Apparatus for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US6201037||Oct 26, 1989||Mar 13, 2001||Ophthalmic Research Group International, Inc.||Plastic lens composition and method for the production thereof|
|US6206673||May 30, 1995||Mar 27, 2001||Ophthalmic Research Group International, Inc.||Plastic lens and plastic lens manufacturing system|
|US6229654||Oct 7, 1999||May 8, 2001||Essilor International Compagnie Generale D'optique||Article with radial refractive index gradient and process for its manufacture|
|US6241505||Nov 17, 1998||Jun 5, 2001||Q2100, Inc.||Apparatus for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US6280171||Jul 26, 1999||Aug 28, 2001||Q2100, Inc.||El apparatus for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US6328445||Jul 26, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Q2100, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for eyeglass lens curing using ultraviolet light|
|US6331058||Mar 10, 2000||Dec 18, 2001||Ophthalmic Research Group International, Inc.||Plastic lens composition and method for the production thereof|
|US6494702||May 12, 1995||Dec 17, 2002||Q2100, Inc.||Apparatus for the production of plastic lenses|
|US6563994 *||Mar 23, 2000||May 13, 2003||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Object with radially-varying properties and apparatus and method of preparing the same|
|US6598429||Nov 17, 2000||Jul 29, 2003||Beamtek, Inc.||Method for fabricating gradient-index rods and rod arrays|
|US6730244||May 30, 1995||May 4, 2004||Q2100, Inc.||Plastic lens and method for the production thereof|
|US6776932||Jun 12, 1998||Aug 17, 2004||Getronics Wang Co. Llc||Polymeric optical articles|
|US7244386 *||Sep 27, 2004||Jul 17, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Method of compensating for a volumetric shrinkage of a material disposed upon a substrate to form a substantially planar structure therefrom|
|US7249847 *||Jan 24, 2006||Jul 31, 2007||Ophthonix, Inc.||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US7338275||May 11, 2005||Mar 4, 2008||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Formation of discontinuous films during an imprint lithography process|
|US7503651||Jan 5, 2007||Mar 17, 2009||Ophthonix, Inc.||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US7547398||Mar 29, 2007||Jun 16, 2009||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Self-aligned process for fabricating imprint templates containing variously etched features|
|US7588333||Mar 13, 2008||Sep 15, 2009||Ophthonix, Inc.||Improving vision in macular degeneration patients|
|US7670529||Mar 2, 2010||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Method and system for double-sided patterning of substrates|
|US7670530||Mar 2, 2010||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Patterning substrates employing multiple chucks|
|US7695134 *||Apr 13, 2010||Ophthonix, Inc.||Apparatus and method of correcting higher-order aberrations of the human eye|
|US7697212 *||Apr 13, 2010||Ophthonix, Inc.||High-order aberration correction for optimization of human visual function|
|US7727453||May 11, 2005||Jun 1, 2010||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Step and repeat imprint lithography processes|
|US7735998||Oct 24, 2007||Jun 15, 2010||Volk Donald A||Multi-layered multifocal lens with blended refractive index|
|US7740354||Jun 22, 2010||Volk Donald A||Multi-layered gradient index progressive lens|
|US7780893||Aug 24, 2010||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Method of concurrently patterning a substrate having a plurality of fields and a plurality of alignment marks|
|US7802978||Mar 30, 2007||Sep 28, 2010||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Imprinting of partial fields at the edge of the wafer|
|US7803308||Dec 1, 2005||Sep 28, 2010||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Technique for separating a mold from solidified imprinting material|
|US7857446||Jan 24, 2006||Dec 28, 2010||Ophthonix, Inc.||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US7906058||Dec 16, 2005||Mar 15, 2011||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Bifurcated contact printing technique|
|US7931368||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 26, 2011||Opthonix, Inc.||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US7988284||Aug 2, 2011||Ophthonix, Inc.||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US8012395||May 12, 2009||Sep 6, 2011||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Template having alignment marks formed of contrast material|
|US8098440||Jan 17, 2012||Ophthonix, Inc.||High-order aberration correction for optimization of human visual function|
|US8142850||Mar 27, 2012||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Patterning a plurality of fields on a substrate to compensate for differing evaporation times|
|US8790104||May 7, 2009||Jul 29, 2014||Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique||Apparatus and method of fabricating a compensating element for wavefront correction using spatially localized curing of resin mixtures|
|US8842370||Jan 3, 2012||Sep 23, 2014||Essilor International||High-order aberration correction for optimization of human visual function|
|US8850980||Mar 30, 2007||Oct 7, 2014||Canon Nanotechnologies, Inc.||Tessellated patterns in imprint lithography|
|US20040238977 *||Jul 8, 2004||Dec 2, 2004||Getronics Wang Co., Llc||Polymeric optical articles|
|US20060068120 *||Sep 27, 2004||Mar 30, 2006||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Method of compensating for a volumetric shrinkage of a material disposed upon a substrate to form a substantially planar structure therefrom|
|US20060119791 *||Jan 24, 2006||Jun 8, 2006||Dreher Andreas W||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US20060119792 *||Jan 24, 2006||Jun 8, 2006||Dreher Andreas W||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US20070109494 *||Jan 5, 2007||May 17, 2007||Dreher Andreas W||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US20070126150 *||Dec 16, 2005||Jun 7, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Bifurcated contact printing technique|
|US20070126156 *||Dec 1, 2005||Jun 7, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Technique for separating a mold from solidified imprinting material|
|US20070132152 *||Nov 30, 2006||Jun 14, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Method and System for Double-Sided Patterning of Substrates|
|US20070170617 *||Jan 19, 2007||Jul 26, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Patterning Substrates Employing Multiple Chucks|
|US20070228610 *||Apr 3, 2007||Oct 4, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Method of Concurrently Patterning a Substrate Having a Plurality of Fields and a Plurality of Alignment Marks|
|US20070231981 *||Mar 28, 2007||Oct 4, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Patterning a Plurality of Fields on a Substrate to Compensate for Differing Evaporation Times|
|US20070243655 *||Mar 29, 2007||Oct 18, 2007||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Self-Aligned Process for Fabricating Imprint Templates Containing Variously Etched Features|
|US20070268452 *||Jul 30, 2007||Nov 22, 2007||Ophthonix, Inc.||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US20070279586 *||May 16, 2007||Dec 6, 2007||Jethmalani Jagdish M||High-order aberration correction for optimization of human visual function|
|US20070290383 *||Aug 20, 2007||Dec 20, 2007||Georg Bogner||Method for producing a lens mold|
|US20080046076 *||Mar 1, 2005||Feb 21, 2008||Michiel Christiaan Rombach||Two Optical Elements Which, In Combination, Form A Lens Of Variable Optical Power For Application As An Intraocular Lens|
|US20080218688 *||Mar 13, 2008||Sep 11, 2008||Dreher Andreas W||Vision in macular degeneration patients|
|US20080252845 *||Oct 9, 2007||Oct 16, 2008||Dreher Andreas W||Apparatus and method of correcting higher-order aberrations of the human eye|
|US20090212465 *||May 7, 2009||Aug 27, 2009||Lai Shui T||Apparatus and method of fabricating a compensating element for wavefront correction using spatially localized curing of resin mixtures|
|US20090231541 *||May 21, 2009||Sep 17, 2009||Dreher Andreas W||Eyeglass manufacturing method using variable index layer|
|US20090250840 *||May 12, 2009||Oct 8, 2009||Molecular Imprints, Inc.||Template Having Alignment Marks Formed of Contrast Material|
|EP0138763A2 *||Oct 1, 1984||Apr 24, 1985||IntraCel Corporation||Process for moulding gels usable for thin layers electrophoresis|
|EP0145392A2 *||Nov 26, 1984||Jun 19, 1985||EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY (a New Jersey corporation)||Optical element with a varying refractive index and a method for its manufacture|
|EP0207640A2 *||Jun 3, 1986||Jan 7, 1987||BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED||Method of making articles of dissimilar polymer compositions|
|EP0322353A2 *||Dec 21, 1988||Jun 28, 1989||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for producing optical element|
|EP0658418A1 *||Dec 2, 1994||Jun 21, 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||Gradial zone lens and method of fabrication|
|EP0728572A2 *||Feb 19, 1996||Aug 28, 1996||Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique)||Process for making transparent articles of graduated refractive index|
|EP2923826A1 *||Mar 28, 2014||Sep 30, 2015||Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique)||Ophthalmic lens and method for manufacturing such a lens|
|WO1987001071A1 *||Aug 20, 1986||Feb 26, 1987||Norsk Hydro A.S.||Preform with graded refractive index and method for construction of the same|
|WO1991004846A1 *||Oct 1, 1990||Apr 18, 1991||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for manufacturing aspherically shaped small lenses|
|WO1992010980A1 *||Dec 10, 1991||Jul 9, 1992||Eastman Kodak Company||Intraocular lenses with gradient-refraction index|
|WO1998045108A1 *||Mar 26, 1998||Oct 15, 1998||Essilor International Compagnie Generale D'optique||Transparent article with radial refractive index gradient and process for its manufacture|
|WO2007137100A3 *||May 16, 2007||Aug 6, 2015||Ophthonix, Inc.||High-order aberration correction for optimization of human visual function|
|U.S. Classification||264/1.38, 264/311, 522/910, 359/654, 264/496, 522/181, 264/2.1, 359/900, 522/183, 264/347, 522/13|
|International Classification||B29C41/22, B29C35/08, B29C41/36, B29C41/04, B29D11/00|
|Cooperative Classification||B29K2995/0031, B29K2105/0002, B29D11/00355, B29C41/22, B29C2035/0827, B29C41/045, B29C35/0894, Y10S359/90, B29L2031/76, Y10S522/91, B29C41/36|
|European Classification||B29C35/08M2, B29C41/36, B29C41/04B2, B29D11/00C8, B29C41/22|