|Publication number||US7163544 B1|
|Application number||US 10/460,830|
|Publication date||Jan 16, 2007|
|Filing date||Jun 12, 2003|
|Priority date||Jun 6, 2003|
|Also published as||EP1638445A2, EP1638445A4, EP1638445B1, WO2004107961A2, WO2004107961A3|
|Publication number||10460830, 460830, US 7163544 B1, US 7163544B1, US-B1-7163544, US7163544 B1, US7163544B1|
|Original Assignee||Nicola Perone|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (12), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (1), Classifications (11), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/455,910, filed Jun. 6, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,014,642.
This invention pertains to devices for assisting in the delivery of a baby. Specifically, the present invention relates to an axis-traction handle with a pull-sensing grip for the obstetrical forceps, containing electronic hardware whose purpose is to measure the pull exerted on the handle, and thus on the fetal head, during a forceps delivery, to alert the doctor when such a pull exceeds preset safety limits, and to enable the wireless transmission of the pull data to a receiver connected with a lap-top computer with specific software.
Obstetrical forceps are medical instruments comprised of two blades (i.e. the fetal head engaging portions), each connected to a handle by a shank, with a sliding lock between the handle and the shank. The forceps typically grasp the fetal head in a tong-like manner and are used for assisting in the delivery of a baby. When needed, they can be a valuable medical tool to shorten or end the second (expulsion of the fetus) stage of labor, whenever to do so is in the best interest of the mother or the fetus.
In 1925 A. H. Bill introduced the axis-traction handle for the obstetrical forceps, which was widely accepted and soon became an integral part of the instrumental delivery armamentarium available in every delivery room.
The Bill axis-traction handle consists of a claw, which is applied to the forceps handle finger guards just like two fingers would grasp them, a vertical rod connecting, through a movable joint, the claw to a horizontal traction rod, which, in turn is attached to a handle grip. The purpose of the Bill axis-traction handle is to increase the accuracy of traction, i.e., to allow the physician to direct the traction away from the symphysis into the axis of the pelvis, which is the one of least resistance, thus, reducing the amount of traction necessary for a forceps delivery.
Regrettably, even when the axis-traction principle is strictly adhered to, the possibility of maternal and/or fetal injury, secondary to excessive pull, remains a reality. In fact, when to desist from further extractive efforts is left to the judgment and courage of the obstetrician.
To be sure, the medical literature contains several reports of attempts made to modify the Bill axis-traction handle in order to be able to measure the pull applied during a forceps delivery, and thus, reduce the risk of injury to the fetus. As early as 1935, B. Wylie reported a modification of the Bill axis-traction handle with the insertion of a spring mechanism to measure the amount of traction during a delivery. A similar spring mechanism was described in 1946 by J. Baxter. In 1959 A. R. Fleming et al. reported a further modification consisting in the placement of strain gauges on the vertical rod of the handle, connected to a recording instrument.
The above modifications, while useful for research purposes, have not, however, gained clinical acceptance, possibly because they require calibration, have cumbersome cable connections, and pose problems with sterilization.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved axis-traction handle for the obstetrical forceps, that can measure the pull exerted on the handle, and thus on the fetal head, during a forceps delivery, without the constraints and design drawbacks seen in the prior art and described above.
The invention consists of an axis-traction handle with a pull-sensing grip for the obstetrical forceps, whose object is to reduce the risk of injury to the fetus, caused by excessive pull during a forceps delivery. The grip contains electronic hardware whose purpose is to measure the pull exerted on the axis-traction handle, and thus on the fetal head, during a forceps delivery, to set off an audible signal when such a pull exceeds preset safety limits, and to transmit in a wireless fashion, the pull data to a receiver connected with a lap-top computer.
A novel feature of this invention is the easy adaptability of the axis-traction handle with the pull-sensing grip to almost any forceps, thus making unnecessary to discard one's favorite forceps. Another novel feature is the elimination of cumbersome cable connections between the strain gauge and the sounder, and between the transceiver and the receiver, which can interfere with the forceps application. Still another novel feature of this invention is the graphic representation of the pull exerted on the axis-traction handle throughout a forceps delivery, useful for research purposes or in case of medical malpractice litigation. A further feature of this invention is that the axis-traction handle with the pull-sensing grip can be either disposed after a single use, or it can be easily sterilized and reused, without significant impact on materials or functionality.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention so that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter, which form the subject of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiments disclosed might be readily used as a basis for modifying or designing other pull-sensing grips for the axis-traction handle for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth herein.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the embodiments of the present invention, and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
It is to be noted that the drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention will admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Turning now to
While many different types of forceps made of different materials have been described and developed throughout time, they consist principally of the following four major components:
(A) Blades: Each blade has two curves. A pelvic curve that follows the direction of the birth canal, and a cephalic curve that fits the shape of the baby's head. The blades can be oval or elliptical and can be fenestrated or solid, with smooth surfaces and edges in order to reduce damage to the soft tissues when applied to the fetal head.
(B) Shanks: These connect the blades to the handles and provide the length of the device. They are either parallel or crossing and are often made of stainless steel.
(C) Lock: Many different types have been designed. The lock is the type of articulation between the shanks.
(D) Handles: These are where the doctor holds the forceps device and applies traction the fetal head. As shown in
Turning now to
As seen in
In particular, the strain gauge (17) measures the pull applied to the handle grip. While any range of traction force may be measured, the typical range force is 0 to 100 pounds of force in a delivery. While there are several methods of measuring strain, the most common is with a strain gauge, such as a resistive gauge. When force is applied to a structure, the length of the structure changes. Strain is the ratio of this change in dimension to the original, and strain gauges are used to measure it. As the strain gauge is glued to the structure, any distortion will also cause a distortion of the strain gauge. The gauge contains semi-conducting material and the distortion therefore results in a change in its resistance. By measuring this change in resistance, one can measure the strain. As such, a strain gauge's electrical resistance varies in proportion to the amount of strain placed on it.
The microprocessor chip (15) controls the functions of the grip assembly. While many different microprocessors known in the art can be used, the preferred chip is an 8-bit chip with sufficient RAM date storage.
The transceiver chip (14) controls radio communications between the grip assembly and radio receiver (1). The preferred transceiver chip is a digital chip that can transmit the desired strain gauge data to the receiver. While any analog or digital radio frequency (RF) or infrared frequency (IF) spectrum communication system is contemplated, any kind of wireless system now known (or to be known) in the art can be used with this device, including Bluetooth wireless technology.
The rechargeable battery (18) provides power during forceps use. As is known to those skilled in the art, popular rechargeable batteries include NiCd and NiMH batteries. If desired, a disposable, non-rechargeable battery such as an alkaline battery can be used.
The field coil recharger (16) provides recharging power to the battery (18) when the axis-traction handle grip assembly rests on the recharging pad (5). The preferred field coil recharger that is used is known as “near-field” field coil recharger.
The sounder or speaker (19) creates an audible warning alarm when the pull on the axis-traction handle reaches a preset safety limit. How much pull to be applied to the axis-traction handle in order to complete a forceps delivery depends on such factors as the number of babies previously borne by the mother and the size and weight of the baby. Of course, instead of an audible alarm signal, the device could be constructed to provide a visual alarm signal or other signal. Because of the size of the device, a micro-speaker is preferred.
The radio frequency antenna (13) relates data between the handle grip assembly and the receiver. In general, any kind of radio frequency antenna system for a wireless infrastructure can be used, such as a digital high frequency antenna.
The radio receiver (1) is connected with a lap-top computer (2), which records the pull data transmitted by the grip assembly and generates a graphic recording of said data, which can be made part of the patient's hospital medical record. Through the wireless technology described herein, the doctor is able to accurately and safely gauge the amount of pull exerted on the axis-traction handle, and thus on the baby's head, by the forceps, thereby preventing damage to the baby and to the mother.
As described herein, the present invention obviates the problems of the prior art by providing a grip for the axis-traction handle, containing all the electronic hardware necessary to accurately measure the pull applied to the axis-traction handle during a forceps delivery, to alert in real-time the doctor when such a pull exceeds preset safety limits, and to enable the wireless transmission of the pull data to a receiver connected with a lap-top computer. In this fashion a graphic representation can be generated of the pull exerted on the axis-traction handle during a forceps delivery, which can be presented in case of medical malpractice litigation, as evidence that safety limits were not exceeded.
In addition, as far as sterilization is concerned, the axis-traction handle with the electronic grip assembly can be provided already sterile and disposed after a single use, or, in its re-usable version, it can be easily sterilized without any damage to the electronic hardware, either through a low temperature sterilization process (such as the STIRRAD method), or, alternatively, by immersion in a sterilizing solution (such as CIDEX). In fact, the printed circuit board is encapsulated within the plastic grip with epoxy compound, thus it is impervious to immersion in a liquid disinfectant.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US683380 *||Apr 6, 1901||Sep 24, 1901||Boston Bottle Wiring And Labeling Company||Obstetrical appliance.|
|US3665925 *||Aug 11, 1970||May 30, 1972||Dersookian Hamo M||Obstetrical forceps|
|US3785381 *||Jan 22, 1973||Jan 15, 1974||L Laufe||Pressure sensing obstetrical forceps|
|US5047046 *||Jul 13, 1988||Sep 10, 1991||Bodoia Rodger D||Surgical forceps|
|US5649934 *||Dec 6, 1994||Jul 22, 1997||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Apparatus for assisting childbirth|
|US6080106 *||Oct 28, 1997||Jun 27, 2000||Alere Incorporated||Patient interface system with a scale|
|US6210330 *||Aug 4, 1999||Apr 3, 2001||Rontech Medical Ltd.||Apparatus, system and method for real-time endovaginal sonography guidance of intra-uterine, cervical and tubal procedures|
|US6402691 *||Sep 20, 2000||Jun 11, 2002||Herschel Q. Peddicord||In-home patient monitoring system|
|US6409636 *||Mar 24, 2000||Jun 25, 2002||Oddzon, Inc.||Electronic jump rope|
|US6425899 *||Jan 12, 2000||Jul 30, 2002||Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.||Obstetric forceps|
|US6468284 *||May 4, 2001||Oct 22, 2002||Clinical Innovation Associates, Inc.||Method and apparatus for vaccum assisted fetal extraction|
|US20020193670 *||May 28, 2002||Dec 19, 2002||Reproductive Health Technologies, Inc.||Device and system for remote for in-clinic trans-abdominal/vaginal/cervical acquisition, and detection, analysis, and communication of maternal uterine and maternal and fetal cardiac and fetal brain activity from electrical signals|
|1||Baxter, J.: The Obstetrical Forceps: Controlled Axis Traction. J. Obstet. Gynec. Brit. Emp. 53:42, 1946.|
|2||Bill, A.H.: A New Axis Traction Handle for Solid Blade Forceps. Am. J. Obstet. & Gynecol. 9:606, 1925.|
|3||Fleming, A.R., Brandeberry, K.R., and Pearse, W.H.: Introduction of a Metric Forceps. Am. J. Obstet. & Gynecol. 78:125, 1959.|
|4||Wylie, B.: Traction in Forceps Deliveries. Am. J. Obstet. & Gynecol. 29:425, 1935.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|WO2011131988A2||Apr 20, 2011||Oct 27, 2011||Hull & East Yorkshire Nhs Trust||Obstetric forcpes|
|International Classification||A61B, A61B17/42, A61B19/00, A61B17/44, A61B17/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B17/442, A61B2017/445, A61B2090/064, A61B2017/0046|
|Apr 13, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 2, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8