Studies of the Immune Response to Vaccination After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Biological: Influenza vaccine
Biological: Varicella vaccine
|Study Design:||Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
|Official Title:||Studies of the Immune Response to Vaccination After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation|
- Change from baseline of Immune response at Day 90 post vaccination. [ Time Frame: Participants will have blood drawn at baseline and on Days 1, 7, 10, 28, and 90 post vaccinations following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Average study participation is 1-3 years post transplant. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Participants will have blood drawn at baseline to Day 90 post vaccinations following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Average study participation is 1-3 years post transplant.
- Immune response [ Time Frame: Participants will have blood drawn at 1 month intervals post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation . Average study participation is 1-3 years post transplant. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Immune response [ Time Frame: Blood will drawn at baseline and Days 1, 7, 10, 28, and 90 post vaccination. Participants will receive the vaccine, 12-28 months post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Biospecimen Retention: Samples With DNA
|Study Start Date:||December 2011|
|Study Completion Date:||December 2014|
|Primary Completion Date:||December 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Patients who have been treated with HSCT
Biological: Influenza vaccine
Influenza vaccine: Injection, post transplant
Other Name: flu vaccineBiological: Varicella vaccine
Varicella vaccine: Injection, post transplant
Other Name: chicken pox vaccine
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation therapy is potentially curative for many malignant and non-malignant hematopoietic disorders. Disease recurrence and infection remain major causes of morbidity and mortality following HSCT. While innate immunity (myeloid and NK cell) is restored relatively quickly following HSCT, a prolonged period of lymphopenia occurs in all patients. This delay in lymphoid reconstitution is exacerbated with age and results in severely dampened adaptive immune responses. In children who have received chemotherapy and HSCT, T cell function generally recovers within 6 to twelve months. In contrast, lymphoid deficiency in adults may require years, and often never recovers to pre-transplant levels. Much of the delay in lymphocyte recovery is thought to be due to decreased thymic T cell production and export and the resulting expansion of treatment resistant T cell clones. Peripheral expansion of T cells in a lymphopenic setting leads to a narrowing of the TCR repertoire and manifests as a decrease in the magnitude of response to new antigens.
These long-lasting T cell deficiencies have been shown to play a direct role in post-transplant complications. There are many studies that correlate decreased T cell number and function (specifically CD4+ T cells) with an increase in post-transplant infections and relapse has been shown to be inversely proportional to T cell reconstitution following both autologous and allogeneic HSCT. Furthermore, this prolonged deficit in T cell function decreases the effectiveness of vaccination against tumour antigens and infectious diseases as well as other post-transplant immunotherapeutic strategies. Following HSCT, patients lose immunological memory not only to infectious microorganisms to which they were previously exposed but also bacterial and viral vaccines given prior to the HSCT , increasing the chance of infection post-transplant. Primary immunization requires antigenic stimulation and functionally mature T cells and therefore at least partial reconstitution of the T and B cell pools is necessary before successful reimmunization can occur.
This study presents an opportunity to analyze, at a systems level, the responses to vaccination in patients who are treated with HSCT. The expected high frequency of low responders to vaccination will permit comparisons of gene expression and immune cell activation between high and low responders as measured by the rate of seroconversion and HAI titers. The evaluation of live VZV vaccination is essential for these objective as the investigators hypothesize that live vaccination will induce a more specific immune response than dead (ie: influenza) vaccination. This study may also generate novel hypotheses about the mechanistic basis for reduced responses to vaccines post HSCT.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01581164
|United States, California|
|University of California, San Francisco|
|San Francisco, California, United States, 94143|
|Principal Investigator:||Jeffrey Venstrom, MD||University of California, San Francisco|