One cannot "visualize" the formless
. This is a logical absurdity; to imagine
necessarily denotes that one forms
. Rather, we should say that one may conceive
(understood in the etymological sense which meant simultaneous "coming into being" and "understanding" through intellectual intuition) of such, and this conception is made not ir
rationally, but supra
-rationally. It is important to differentiate between genuine gnosis and the Romantic agnosticism (again, the etymological denotation is implied) that otherwise highly intelligent individuals fall prey to once they've exhausted the limits of understanding that the modern sciences almost universally afford, whether they be mathematical, linguistic, or physical sciences.
What we've hoped to have highlighted here are primarily 1) the need to prevent any further loss of knowledge that has arisen through the decay of language, and 2) a clear understanding of structure, which one has explained well here