|Publication number||US5478031 A|
|Application number||US 08/128,510|
|Publication date||Dec 26, 1995|
|Filing date||Sep 29, 1993|
|Priority date||Sep 29, 1993|
|Publication number||08128510, 128510, US 5478031 A, US 5478031A, US-A-5478031, US5478031 A, US5478031A|
|Inventors||William A. Piche|
|Original Assignee||Rockwell International Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (14), Classifications (4), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention generally relates to aircraft autopilots, and more particularly concerns autopilots for general aviation aircraft of the type not typically having autothrottles.
In the aviation industry, large commercial jetliners in the air transport market typically have both autopilot and autothrottle systems thereon to aid a pilot in controlling the speed and attitude of the aircraft. In smaller, general aviation aircraft, such as business jets and commuter planes, typically there is no autothrottle system. The pilot is left with the task of manually making all throttle or thrust adjustments. However, general aviation autopilots have typically used elevator adjustments, commanded by the autopilot, to control airspeed. While this approach has been used widely in the past, it does have some drawbacks when the pilot induced throttle changes oppose the autopilot elevator control.
When a pilot selects a higher desired airspeed the autopilot may pitch the aircraft down to gain more speed. If the pilot increases the throttle setting to attain the higher airspeed and causes a rate-of-change of airspeed which exceeds the rate limit set by the autopilot, the autopilot may command a pitch-up to reduce the rate-of-change of airspeed. The result is that the aircraft makes large undesirable pitch attitude excursions and takes longer to reach the desired airspeed. A similar problem exists when a pilot wishes to simultaneously descend and reduce airspeed, and reduce thrust.
Consequently, there exists a need for improved autopilot systems which do not exhibit the undesirable pitch attitude excursions.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an autopilot system with enhanced pitch attitude control.
It is a feature of the present invention to include a pitch attitude hold command and airspeed capture point computation during airspeed acquisition and flight level change maneuvers.
It is an advantage of the present invention to command pitch changes in airspeed acquisition maneuvers.
The present invention provides an improved autopilot system which is designed to satisfy the aforementioned needs, produce the earlier propounded objects, include the above described features, and achieve the already articulated advantages. The invention is carried out in a "rollercoaster-less" approach in the sense that the typical up-pitches followed by down-pitches, in a climb and accelerate maneuver, are eliminated. Instead, a pitch-hold command is temporarily utilized until a calculated airspeed capture point is reached. This eliminates the autopilot up-down-pitch command and the unwanted "rollercoaster" effect.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an autopilot system for controlling the pitch of an aircraft that utilizes, in some circumstances, a temporary pitch-hold command when both desired airspeed and manual throttle settings are changed.
The invention may be more fully understood by reading the following description of a preferred embodiment of the invention in conjunction with the appended drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a control circuit diagram, of the prior art.
FIG. 2 is a control circuit diagram of the present invention, which includes a switch for temporarily setting the pitch command to zero.
FIG. 3 is a logic diagram of the airspeed control logic 202 of FIG. 2.
Now referring to the Figures where like numerals refer to like matter and text throughout.
Now referring to FIG. 1, there is schematically shown the airspeed control law for a prior art autopilot system which is generally designated 100. This autopilot system 100 is designed to manipulate the orientation of the aircraft elevator 138, which is coupled with drive servo 134 by mechanical linkage 136. The operation of drive servo 134 is affected by signals received from sensors or controllers located elsewhere in the aircraft, such as airspeed sensors, AHRS, and autopilot input commands. Typically, the autopilot system 100 is performed by an on-board flight control computer configured to implement the control laws. However, it is possible to utilize a combination of individual circuit elements to construct a hardware system customized for such an application.
In more detail, the system 100 operates as follows: an airspeed reference 102, which is typically a numbered dial disposed in the cockpit for generating airspeed reference signals as commanded by the pilot, which is coupled to a rate limit 104 which typically forms the function of limiting the rate-of-change of airspeed to a certain predetermined limit which is a function of the particular aircraft. This rate limited signal then is delayed by lowpass smoothing filter 106 which imparts a lag into the signal. The rate limited and time lagged airspeed reference signal is then provided on line 108. Also included is an airspeed sensor 110 for sensing the actual airspeed of the aircraft, and additionally there is included an along heading acceleration sensor 112 for sensing the actual along heading acceleration of the aircraft. Outputs from sensors 110 and 112 are combined at complementary filter 114 and then provided along line 116 to summer 118 where an error signal representing the difference between the signals on line 108 and 116 is provided on line 120. The error signal on line 120 is sent through damping circuit 122 and is added to the error signal which is XXX. This is converted to an autopilot pitch command by constant 124 which creates a predetermined degree of pitch for a predetermined airspeed error signal. This pitch command is provided to a pitch attitude loop 132 which outputs a servo command to drive servo 134. Drive servo 134 is connected to mechanical linkage 136 which is coupled to the aircraft elevator 138.
Now referring to FIG. 2 there is shown an improved airspeed control system, of the present invention, generally designated 200 which includes much of the airspeed control system of the prior art of FIG. 1 and numerous additional and substitute structure and function. The improved system 200 includes airspeed control logic 202 which monitors the airspeed reference, the airspeed rate, and the current airspeed. The airspeed control logic 202 determines if the aircraft is above or below the current airspeed. The airspeed control logic 202 also determines if a large change in thrust will oppose the autopilot elevator control and controls switch 206 and switch 208 so that switch 206 is caused to be closed and switch 208 is caused to be opened. The closing of switch 206 provides the ability for the pilot to override the present rate limit, of the prior art systems, and allows the airspeed rate on line 210 to be used as the rate limit value for 204. The rate limit 204 typically has a predetermined rate limit for the aircraft therein much like rate limit 104, of the prior art, but additionally will give priority to and will allow the airspeed rate signal on line 210 to control if switch 206 is closed. The switch 208 is switched to the opened position and consequently the airspeed control system pitch command to the pitch attitude control is set to zero. This essentially results in a pitch-hold command. The switches 206 and 208 will be held in the closed and opened positions, respectively, until the airspeed control logic 202 determines that the actual airspeed 110 has reached a computed airspeed capture point. The airspeed capture point computation is a function of the airspeed rate on line 210. A higher airspeed rate will result in a larger difference between the airspeed capture point and the airspeed reference of 102. When the airspeed 110 reaches the airspeed capture point, the airspeed control logic 202 switches the switches 206 and 208 to open and closed positions, respectively. This allows the airspeed control system to issue pitch commands to control airspeed in a fashion that is very similar to the prior art system of 100.
In operation, the system 200 of the present invention reduces the "rollercoaster" effect that might normally occur when a pilot might simultaneously make an airspeed reference change and a throttle position change, if the pilot was flying an aircraft utilizing a system 100 of the prior art. The system 200 generally provides for a pitch-hold command during circumstances when the pilot's throttle change would normally dictate a result different than the prior art autopilot 100. The pitch-hold command is continued until the airspeed 110 has reached a computed airspeed capture point at which time the pitch-hold command is removed and the pitch control is returned to the normal airspeed pitch control command system.
Now referring to FIG. 3, there is shown a logic diagram, generally designated 300, of a preferred embodiment of the airspeed control logic 202 of FIG. 2. Comparators 302, 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318 and 320 are all devices for generating a digital signal in response to a comparison of two inputs which may be linear. The remainder of the logic diagram 300 is digital in nature and in accordance with conventional digital logic diagram drawing practices. The overall result of circuit 300 is a determination of when the pitch hold command is issued,(i.e. when to use the actual airspeed rate and when switch 208 (FIG. 2) is open). Additionally, a determination of when airspeed capture occurs (i.e. predetermined airspeed rate limits are used instead of actual airspeed rate, thus pitch hold command is released and switch 208 (FIG. 2) is closed). Other control logic schemes may be used which result in the described operation.
It is thought that the airspeed control system, of the present invention, and many of its attendant advantages will be understood from the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction, and arrangement of the parts and steps thereof without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing all of their material advantages, the form herein described being merely being a preferred or exemplary embodiment thereof.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4471439 *||Oct 28, 1983||Sep 11, 1984||The Boeing Company||Method and apparatus for aircraft pitch and thrust axes control|
|US4536843 *||Sep 30, 1982||Aug 20, 1985||The Boeing Company||Total energy based flight control system|
|US4764872 *||Jul 16, 1986||Aug 16, 1988||Honeywell Inc.||Vertical flight path and airspeed control system for aircraft|
|US5079711 *||Feb 26, 1990||Jan 7, 1992||The Boeing Company||Aircraft high altitude vertical flight path and speed control system|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5746392 *||May 15, 1995||May 5, 1998||The Boeing Company||Autopilot/flight director underspeed protection system|
|US5833177 *||May 15, 1995||Nov 10, 1998||The Boeing Company||Autopilot/flight director overspeed protection system|
|US5836546 *||Jan 10, 1997||Nov 17, 1998||The Boeing Company||Autopilot/flight director underspeed protection system|
|US5908176 *||Jan 14, 1997||Jun 1, 1999||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||In-flight adaptive performance optimization (APO) control using redundant control effectors of an aircraft|
|US6192640 *||Sep 3, 1998||Feb 27, 2001||Darryl L. Snyder||Double divisible connector frame for mounting air grilles and louvers to heating and cooling duct outlets|
|US6722616 *||Dec 27, 2001||Apr 20, 2004||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Method of lift control of aircraft and system therefor|
|US6827314 *||May 20, 2003||Dec 7, 2004||Airbus France||Aircraft with active control of the warping of its wings|
|US7433765 *||May 3, 2005||Oct 7, 2008||Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation||Fly by wire static longitudinal stability compensator system|
|US8606437 *||Nov 28, 2011||Dec 10, 2013||Embraer S.A.||Flight control system mode and method providing aircraft speed control through the usage of momentary on-off control|
|US20030122038 *||Dec 27, 2001||Jul 3, 2003||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Method of lift control of aircraft and system therefor|
|US20060253230 *||May 3, 2005||Nov 9, 2006||Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation||Fly by wire static longitudinal stability compensator system|
|US20130138274 *||Nov 28, 2011||May 30, 2013||Embraer S.A.||Flight Control System Mode And Method Providing Aircraft Speed Control Through The Usage Of Momentary On-Off Control|
|CN101495369B||Apr 28, 2006||Jun 13, 2012||西科尔斯基飞机公司||Fly-by-wire static longitudinal stability compensator system|
|WO2007084170A2 *||Apr 28, 2006||Jul 26, 2007||Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation||Fly by wire static longitudinal stability compensator system|
|Nov 26, 1993||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, IOWA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PICHE, WILLIAM A.;REEL/FRAME:006781/0338
Effective date: 19931122
|Jul 20, 1999||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Dec 26, 1999||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Mar 7, 2000||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19991226