Like I said you don't understand MMA mentality or philosophy at all. It is sad you post a false definition you obviously don't understand.
of course it can, depending how we define MMA. i don't know what the general consensus here is, but sure, MMA means "mixed martial arts", and of course, technically speaking, an MMA guy is basically someone who crosstrains, comparable to the JKD philosophy. but generally speaking, most people understand MMA as a mix of BJJ, MT, boxing, and kickboxing, and go to MMA schools to train in those particular arts. if you're going to get all technical on me to out argue me, don't bother. if clarification is needed, be my guest.
That puts you right in the ASSumption (poor overused play on words and unoriginal) boat you are currently whining about. Thanks for proving you don't understand MMA. It negates you assumption argument towards me.
i don't know what the general consensus here is, but sure, MMA means "mixed martial arts", and of course, technically speaking, an MMA guy is basically someone who crosstrains, comparable to the JKD philosophy.
Nope, that is what you believe **** nut. TMAers hit bags, they ran, they did body weight exercises and they foguht. The distinction came from idiots like you that want their **** to be something special, instead of another form of fighting.
see above, man of many ASSumptions. but there is a general philosophy behind the way an MMA fighter trains, especially in contrast to TMA. is TMA a style, "dumbass?" no, but we all know what we're speaking of when we say "MMA vs. TMA." so there you go again, being totally irrelevant, playing semantics and making every bitchy illogical argument you can just to look like mr. authoritative bullshido watchdog.