We've got a hot star in the middle of a gas cloud. We point a spectrometer at the star, calculating the following attributes of our line of sight at the star through the cloud:
- Total number of various elements and molecules (H, H2, C, O, N, CO, lots of ions of all of the above) along the line of sight (units are number/cm^2)
- Average temperature of the atoms in our line of sight
- Average radial velocity of the atoms in our line of sight
All the radial velocities are roughly the same, so we infer that the line of sight is more or less a single coherent blob of gas. Good!
Now, the star itself which illuminated the line of sight is moving about 40 km/s towards us, while the gas cloud chunk we observed is moving at around 20 km/s away. Also, from comparing the luminosity of the star to the temperature of the gas, we conclude that the gas cloud is a light year or two away from the star.
Given all this information, here is your task: If we take another spectrum of the same line of sight ten years from now, will it be the same blob of gas?
I will tell you right away that the radial velocity will only make the gas 0.002LY closer to the star, which is way less than what we need. So, in other words, given all the above, can you conclude anything about the transverse velocity of the cloud? Can you tell anything about the bulk flow and determine whether it is probable that the gas in our line of sight has moved with respect to the star?
My physical intuition says that you'd expect yes, since the radial velocities are so different, but I'm not totally sure - the radial velocity doesn't necessarily imply anything about the transverse velocity. Or does it?