|Publication number||US7904488 B2|
|Application number||US 10/896,575|
|Publication date||8 Mar 2011|
|Filing date||21 Jul 2004|
|Priority date||21 Jul 2004|
|Also published as||CN1725220A, EP1662380A2, EP1662380A3, US20060020578|
|Publication number||10896575, 896575, US 7904488 B2, US 7904488B2, US-B2-7904488, US7904488 B2, US7904488B2|
|Inventors||Gavan W. Hood|
|Original Assignee||Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (225), Non-Patent Citations (20), Referenced by (7), Classifications (6), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates generally to unique identifiers, and more particularly to creating a unique identifier format that provides benefits in connection with manufacturing applications as well as indexing and searching.
Advancements in computer technology and software have enabled communication to occur almost instantaneously. For example, through email an individual in New York can receive a document, image, message, or the like from an individual in California in a matter of seconds. Such advances in technology are not limited solely to communications, but directly or indirectly affect every business and individual. For instance, industrial control systems have enabled modern factories to become partially or completely automated in many circumstances, thereby reducing cost of the factory and consequently passing on such cost reduction to a consumer.
Development of software components and interfacing therebetween is an exemplary advancement in technology that has facilitated cross-software communication. To ensure that components and/or objects interface correctly, Globally Unique Identifiers (GUIDs) are employed to uniquely identify such interfaces. A GUID is a pseudo-random number used in software applications, wherein each GUID is desirably unique. The GUID is an implementation of a standard entitled Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) as specified by the Open Software Foundation. The UUID standard calls for 128 bits to be employed to uniquely identify a component, object, document, etc. Previously, GUIDs were generated based at least in part upon a network card MAC address (e.g., the address was utilized as part of the GUID), meaning that a document could be tracked to the computer which created such document. Due to privacy concerns, however, today's GUIDs do not include a portion of such network card MAC addresses, and are simply employed as a pseudo-random number for uniqueness.
In a manufacturing setting, disparate systems and/or methodologies are employed to uniquely identify an object, document, etc. For example, an object whose generation is based upon a machine can have a time-stamp associated with such generation, thus identifying the object based upon the time-stamp. Further, a sequential number can be employed to identify an object, document, or the like in a manufacturing environment. For instance, an internal counter can be employed in connection with the machine, and objects, documents, etc. can be assigned an identifier according to sequence of creation. In a distributed computing environment/enterprise system, however, these identification methodologies can prove to be inadequate as overlap may occur. Particularly, two connected devices can generate a component, object, document, or the like at a substantially similar time, rendering time-stamps inadequate as unique identifiers. Further, a reboot or system crash can result in re-numbering and duplication of an assigned sequential number. Accordingly, time-stamps and/or sequential numbering, while important for indexing and searching in a manufacturing environment, are insufficient as unique identifiers in a distributed computing environment/enterprise system.
Data bases are another area in which utilization of unique identifiers may be necessary. Particularly, when there exists a plurality of data bases with disparate formats in an enterprise system, it can be extremely difficult to effectively combine that data and perform data mining tasks across the entirety of the data. A data base contains a plurality of rows and a plurality of fields, wherein each row should be unique so that when two data bases are rolled up (combined), there is no overwriting of data. A GUID can be placed in each row to provide this required uniqueness—however, semantics for identification of the row as the primary key will be lost. For example, names are typically employed as a unique identifier in a stand-alone data base. When several data bases are combined, however, similar files with identical names can cause overwriting of rows, and thus loss of data. Therefore, a GUID can be placed in each to ensure uniqueness between rows, but searching by a GUID is time-consuming and can be frustrating, as it is essentially a pseudo-random number that will mean nothing an individual performing the search.
Accordingly, there exists a need in the art for a system and/or methodology for providing uniqueness to objects, documents, and the like in an enterprise system and/or in a data mining/indexing application.
The following presents a simplified summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention. It is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of the invention nor delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The following presents a simplified summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention. It is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of the invention nor delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The present invention makes up for the many of the aforementioned deficiencies of conventional unique identifiers that are employed to identify objects. The subject invention provides a system and/or methodology for generating a unique identifier that can be employed in connection with indexing and/or searching a plurality of objects that are utilized in a manufacturing environment. As manufacturing systems trend towards substantially complete automation, a greater number of objects associated with such automation will be generated. Further, as industries become more global, comparison and indexing of objects relating to manufacturing performance of disparate factories at disparate locations will become more desirable. Such a plethora of objects/data requires an indexing scheme that enables users to quickly and efficiently locate a desired object.
The present invention accomplishes these and other benefits by employing data that is often utilized in a manufacturing environment to uniquely identify objects. More particularly, objects in a manufacturing environment typically are associated with time-stamps and/or sequence numbers, which are defined herein as object instance data. For a specific example, work orders are typically associated with a time-stamp. Indexing an object by a time-stamp alone, however, can result in disastrous overwrite of data, as it is possible that two objects will have substantially similar time-stamps. The subject invention mitigates occurrences of data overwrite by packaging at least object instance data together with a random/pseudorandom number to create a unique identifier. Therefore, for example, in an instance that two objects are time-stamped at a substantially similar time, due to existence of the random/pseudorandom number probabilities of identical identifiers are miniscule.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the unique identifiers are created in accordance with Universal Unique Identifier (UUID) standards. Such a format is beneficial when previously generated objects are identified in a central directory by conventional unique identifiers, such as globally unique identifiers (GUIDs). Utilizing this format provides indexing compatibility between objects identified by conventional identifiers and objects identified by the unique identifiers of the present invention. Thus, a separate indexing scheme is not required, thereby enabling efficient location of objects.
The unique identifiers of the present invention can also comprise/utilize various other identifying indicia in connection with identifying a particular object. For example, an object name, object type, version number, machine identity, node identity, location, and any other suitable identifying indicia can be employed in connection with the present invention to facilitate indexing/identifying an object. More particularly, these identifying indicia can be hashed and placed within the unique identifier according to a pre-determined format (e.g., a format in compliance with UUID standards). Thereafter the unique identifier can be interrogated, and identifying indicia (and the object instance data) can be extracted, analyzed, and/or manipulated according to application requirements.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a common set of algorithms can be employed to generate unique identifiers regardless of type of object instance data and/or identifying indicia is utilized to generate such unique identifier. Accordingly, a common indexing scheme can be provided regardless of type of object instance data an/or identifying indicia is employed in connection with generating the unique identifier. This provides a substantial benefit over conventional systems/methods employed to index objects in a manufacturing environment, as several indexing schemes are typically required. Specifically, conventional indexing schemes required objects identified by time-stamps to be indexed separately from objects identified by sequence number.
The present invention further provides for efficient data rollup of a plurality of databases. For one particular example, a car manufacturing company may utilize several plants that exist at disparate geographic locations and store data/objects relating to manufacturing in disparate databases. It is often desirable to direct this data/objects from disparate locations to a single database for comparison and/or recordkeeping. Utilizing conventional object identification systems and/or methods, a chance of data overwrite existed as two machines at two disparate places can generate objects with substantially similar time-stamps and/or sequence numbers. The unique identifiers of the present invention mitigate such occurrences of data overwrite by providing random data within the unique identifier. It is possible to utilize purely random identifiers, such as GUIDs, to identify objects. However, other useful data must be linked as metadata to the objects, causing redundant uniqueness and confusion. Further, employing GUIDs eliminates a possibility of utilizing time-stamps, sequence numbers, or other useful identifying indicia as a primary indexing key. Thus, the present invention provides various benefits in connection with rollup of data over a distributed system.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention then, comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the invention. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed and the present invention is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The present invention is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It may be evident, however, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing the present invention.
As used in this application, the terms “component,” “handler,” “model,” “system,” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. Also, these components can execute from various computer readable media having various data structures stored thereon. The components may communicate via local and/or remote processes such as in accordance with a signal having one or more data packets (e.g., data from one component interacting with another component in a local system, distributed system, and/or across a network such as the Internet with other systems via the signal).
Referring now to the drawings,
The system 100 further includes a randomizer 106, wherein the unique identifier creator 102 receives random/pseudorandom data therefrom. The randomizer 106 is employed to mitigate occurrences of overlapping identifiers. For instance, two objects created at a substantially similar time may be associated with substantially similar timestamps. If those timestamps alone are utilized as identifiers, there will be an overlap and one object may be overwritten. Similarly, a reboot or crash can cause a machine that provides sequential identifiers to overwrite previous sequential identifiers. The randomizer 106 mitigates such occurrences by providing the unique identifier creator 102 with random data. The unique identifier creator 102 combines the object instance data 104 with the random data provided by the randomizer 106 to generate a unique identifier and associate it with an object 108. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the generated unique identifier can be 128 bits in size, which is a size of conventional GUIDs. Thus, unique identifiers created in accordance with the present invention are compatible with conventional data structures and/or indexing.
Further, an algorithm employed in connection with the randomizer 106 can embed useable data within pseudorandom data provided by such randomizer 106. Particularly, an algorithm employed to ensure uniqueness within the randomizer 106 can be configured to allow inspection of pseudo random data produced therefrom, thereby enabling inspection/extraction of valuable information about the object identified.
For instance, the pseudo random data can indicate class identification of a computer object, type identification of a computer object, etc. (e.g., the unique identifier is an object identifier and pseudo-random data therein includes indicia relating to its parent in an inheritance hierarchy). Moreover, the pseudo-random data output by the randomizer 106 can include indicia and/or explicit information relating to origin of a unique identifier. This information can be an index into system table(s) that indicates production specific information such as location in a plant/enterprise in which the unique identifier was generated. Thereby time and/or or location indicia relating to the object can be obtained.
The present invention provides various benefits over conventional GUIDs and other identifiers. For example, GUIDs are 128 bits in length, but contain no data that can be employed in connection with indexing objects and/or searching over a plurality of objects. Utilizing a unique identifier generated by the unique identifier creator 102 enables one to index and search based upon information that is useful in a manufacturing setting, such as the object instance data 104 (e.g., time-related data and/or series data). In a particular example, work orders are often associated with timestamps, and are indexed according to such timestamps. In an enterprise environment, indexing such work orders according only to the timestamps is inefficient and can result in data loss. Moreover, an entirely separate indexation is required for objects that are identified sequentially. Thus, for instance, objects identified by timestamps must be indexed separately from objects identified by sequence. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the unique identifier creator 102 can employ a set of algorithms that provides a single format for indexation and identification regardless of whether the objects are identified by timestamps or sequence number. Accordingly, the unique identifiers created via employment of the present invention can be interrogated by utilizing a single set of algorithms, rather than requiring disparate algorithms to interrogate/index differing formats (e.g., timestamp and sequence number formats).
The system 100 also provides a mechanism in which to generate unique identifiers that incorporate the object instance data 104 with respect to archived objects. More particularly, the unique identifier creator 102 is not limited to creating unique identifiers at time of creation of the object 108. Rather, the unique identifier creator 102 can be employed to update objects utilized in manufacturing that were previously identified by timestamps and/or sequence number (e.g., the object instance data 104). The unique identifier creator 102 can thereafter access such object instance data 104 and receive random data from the randomizer 106 to create a unique identifier that can be employed to identify the pre-existing object 108. Such an aspect is beneficial during instances that archived data in a data store that was previously not networked is brought into an enterprise system, as it mitigates occurrences of duplicate identifiers and overwriting of data. Further, the unique identifier creator 102 can generate a unique identifier at time of creation of the object instance data 104. Such an aspect enables updating of unique identifiers upon alteration of objects.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the unique identifier creator 102 can receive a plurality of information together with the object instance data 104 to generate a unique identifier. For instance, an assigned name can be placed within the unique identifier, as well as object type, version number, and all other suitable identification information relating to the object 108. The system 100 can also be employed to decipher the unique identifier and break such unique identifier into disparate identifiable portions. For one particular example, the unique identifier can be stored in a database, and the unique identifier creator 102 can be employed to extract the object instance data 104 from the unique identifier and store such object instance data in a field within the database. Similarly, the unique identifier creator 102 can extract the random data generated by the randomizer 106 and place that within a separate field within the database, and other identifying data within the unique identifier can be placed within disparate fields. Thus, data employed by the unique identifier creator 102 to generate the unique identifier exists in separate fields and not within a single unique identifier. Thereafter those fields can be interrogated while maintaining uniqueness of the row of the database encompassing such fields.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, the unique identifier creator 102 can generate a unique identifier based upon a timestamp independent of a time zone. For example, the unique identifier creator 102 can utilize Universal Coordinated Time to provide a consistent format for the unique identifier across an enterprise system that is distributed throughout a plurality of time zones. Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) is employed around the world, as time zones are expressed as positive or negative differentiations therefrom. Furthermore, the FILETIME time format can be employed by the unique identifier creator 102 to generate and/or modify a timestamp to render such timestamp independent of time zone. Particularly, time-stamp entries employed by the unique identifier creator 102 can employ a substantially similar base time as FILETIME. The FILETIME structure is a 64-bit value representing a number of 100 nanosecond intervals since Jan. 1, 1601 (UTC). In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, Greenwich Mean Time can be employed in connection with generating the unique identifier. Thus, it is to be understood that any suitable time format/conversion can be employed by the unique identifier creator 102 in connection with generating a unique identifier that is independent of time zone of object creation/residency. Alternatively, it may be desirable to utilize local times in connection with a timestamp. Conversions from local time to UTC and vice versa are made by the unique identifier creator 102 to generate a unique identifier according to a desirable format (e.g., time representations can be selected by a user of the present invention). Conversions can include accounting for a local time offset, and can utilize a time according to a server (e.g., SQL date-time) in connection with generating the unique identifier.
Turning now to
The unique identifier creator 202 can also employ various other identifying indicia 214 in connection with generating a unique identifier and associating such unique identifier with the object 212. For instance, object type, version type, version number, object name, location of creation of the object 212, and various other suitable identifying indicia can be employed in connection with the present invention. The unique identifier creator 202 can embed at least portions of the identifying indicia 214 into the unique identifier, and the object 212 can be indexed and/or searched over based at least in part upon the generated unique identifier and contents thereof. For example, the object 212 can be primarily indexed based upon the time-stamp 208, and secondarily indexed based at least in part upon the identifying indicia 214. The randomizer 206 is provided to mitigate occurrences of duplicate time-stamps 208 and/or sequence numbers 210 between two or more objects. By employing a random number in connection with the object instance data 204 and identifying indicia 214, possibilities of generating a duplicate unique identifier for two are more objects are extremely small. This is extremely important given globalization of businesses and current trends towards bringing archived data into a network and trends of rolling up data of different databases.
Now referring to
An interrogator 310 is employed to extract data relevant to an operation and/or search from the unique identifier 302. For example, the interrogator 310 can be utilized to extract and analyze the object instance data 304 within the unique identifier 302. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the interrogator 310 employs a common set of algorithms regardless of what type of object instance data 304 resides within the unique identifier 302. For example, two disparate indexing schemes are not required for objects 308 associated with time-stamp data and objects 308 associated with sequence number data. Further, the interrogator can extract and/or analyze other identifying indicia within the unique identifier 302. For instance, the unique identifier can include version number object type, etc., and the interrogator 310 can extract and/or analyze each of such identifying indicia. Thus, a single indexing scheme can be generated when employing the system 300, rather than creating confusing and possibly redundant multiple indexing schemes.
Referring now to
At 402, and object is generated/selected. For instance, the methodology 400 can be employed with newly generated objects as well as archived objects previously created. These objects include any suitable object that is employable within a manufacturing environment. For example, a work order document is an object in accordance with the present invention, as are spreadsheets indicating operation parameters of a plurality of automated machines at a particular point in time. As factories become increasingly automated, objects will more frequently be automatically generated given a particular industrial task.
At 404, object instance data associated with the object is created in a case of a newly generated object and/or obtained in a case of a pre-existing object. Object instance data is defined as a time-stamp and/or a sequence number associated with the object. These types of data are typically utilized in industrial environments to at least partially identify objects created for an application within such environment. This object instance data alone, however, is insufficient to identify objects, particularly in an enterprise environment (e.g., within a unified plant model). This is because objects can be created at substantially similar times, and sequence numbers can overlap due to errors/reboots.
At 406, random data is generated to mitigate occurrences of overlap between identifying indicia of objects. Conventional GUIDs also employ randomness to uniquely identify objects—however, GUIDs are employed solely for such randomness and include no useful information that can be extracted therefrom. At 408, the object instance data is packaged with the random data to generate a unique identifier in accordance with the present invention. A single set of algorithms can be employed regardless of type or combination of object instance data that is employed to identify an object. For instance, a format of the generated unique identifier can be manipulated and controlled to enable a single indexation of objects despite disparate identifiers employed to identify such objects.
At 410, the unique identifier is associated with the generated/selected object to effectively provide unique identification of such object. For instance, the unique identifier can be linked to the object within a database. In accordance with a disparate embodiment, the unique identifier is embedded within an object, and each object can be indexed according to their respective unique identifiers. It is understood that conventional GUIDs can be employed to uniquely identify objects rather than the unique identifiers of the subject invention. There are, however, several deficiencies associated with indexing and identifying objects according to GUIDs. For example, GUIDs require utilization of additional memory space, as useful indicating indicia (e.g., time-related data, sequence-related data, . . . ) must be stored and maintained separately. Further, the GUIDs must be utilized as a primary indexing/searching key if they are employed as a unique identifier. As the GUIDs are solely employed for uniqueness, however, it can be nearly impossible to distinguish between objects. The methodology 400 makes up for such deficiencies by providing object instance data within the unique identifier.
Now referring to
At 504, the unique identifier is interrogated—therefore, at least the object instance data relating to the object is interrogated. For example, a user can request that all objects generated on a particular date be returned to such user for further analysis. Further, requests can be made relating to various other identifying indicia resident within the unique identifier. For instance, the user can request that all objects created on a particular day that are of a particular type be returned to the user. At 506, unique identifier algorithms are provided to effectuate such searching and/or data extraction. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, substantially similar sets of algorithms are employed to create and interrogate the unique object identifier. This enables generation of a single indexing scheme, even when objects are associated with disparate object instance data.
At 508, objects are returned/indexed based upon the interrogation. For example, during an instance that a user interrogates a plurality of unique identifiers for objects created on a particular date, a listing of such objects can be indexed and/or returned to the user. Further, links or other location specifying devices can be provided to enable the user to select and/or activate a particular object within the listing of objects. Thus, the interrogation can be performed over a single database/index structure rather than requiring the user first to locate an appropriate data base and thereafter interrogate an object.
Now referring to
It is to be understood that the unique identifier 600 can include a greater amount of information than illustrated. For example, the unique identifier can include a MAC ID, a path of a machine that created the object, a version identifier, node identifier, machine identifier, or any other suitable information that can be employed to facilitate identification of an object or portion thereof. Further, hashes of such information are contemplated by the present invention and intended to fall under the scope of the hereto-appended claims. A common set of algorithms is employed to generate all unique identifiers, thereby enabling a single indexing scheme to be created. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the time-stamp 606 can employ a substantially similar base time as FILETIME. Other base times, however, can be employed in accordance with the present invention, and conversion between base times as is known in the art can be employed in connection with the unique identifier 600.
Now referring to
It may be desirable to combine the databases 706 with the databases 708 within a central database 710 to effectuate an efficient comparison between performance of location A 702 and performance of location B 704. Utilizing conventional systems and/or methodologies would result in possible overwriting of data, and would require a substantial amount of time to manually separate disparate indexing schemes within the central database 710. For instance, contents of one database at location A 702 may require a different indexing scheme than a disparate database at location A 702 due to different identification schemas (e.g., differences between objects identified by time-stamps and objects identified by sequence numbers). GUIDs could be employed to mitigate occurrences of overwrite, but indexing then becomes problematic due to lack of identifying indicia within the GUID. The unique identifiers of the present invention enable combination of various databases containing objects relating to manufacturing (e.g., data rollup) while providing a singular indexing scheme and mitigating occurrences of data overwrite. Thus, the databases 706 and 708 can be rolled into the central database 710, and objects therein can be interrogated and/or compared.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Referring now to
The system 1000 further includes a unique identifier generator 1010 that creates unique identifiers based upon information contained within the plurality of databases 1004-1008. The databases 1004-1008 include a plurality of rows, wherein each row comprises an object and object instance data associated therewith. The rows can further comprise various other suitable identifying indicia, such as object class, object version, location of generation, etc. For instance, these disparate identifying indicia can reside within a plurality of different fields. This enables a local search component 1012 to search the database 1004 (or any other database attached to the local search component 1012) by field. For example, the search component 1012 can search the database 1004 based upon date of creation of an object. The search component 1012 will then return all objects that were created on the specified day, together with other identifying indicia. A user can thereafter locate a desired object based upon date of creation and other returned indicia, while rows remain unique due to an associated random number within one of the fields together with other identifying indicia.
The present invention contemplates efficient transformation of databases with respect to data resident within fields and unique identifiers. For example, the central directory 1002 can receive a request for a particular object based upon a unique identifier. The central directory 1002 will relay the request to the unique identifier generator 1010, which will generate unique identifications based upon identifying indicia of objects within the databases 1004-1010. For example, the unique identifier generator 1010 can be associated with memory and temporarily store the generated unique identifiers within the memory. In a disparate embodiment, the databases 1004-1008 can be manipulated as shown with respect to
Now turning to
At 1104, object instance data is stored within the database in a plurality of disparate fields. Databases include one or more rows and one or more columns. Thus, each row includes one or more fields where data can be stored. The rows in a database must be unique—otherwise data overlap and data overwrite occur. The object instance data is defined as time-stamps, time-related data, sequence numbers, and/or series-related data. Various other identifying indicia, such as object name, object class, version number, object type, etc. can also be stored within one or more fields within the database.
At 1106, a call from a directory based upon a unique identifier is received. This unique identifier is utilized by the directory to locate an object associated with the unique identifier. For example, the directory will search the fields for a unique identifier that matches the unique identifier that is requested. Upon location of the matching unique identifier, the directory will forward that location onto a requesting machine. At 1108, unique identifiers are generated for objects within the database based at least in part upon the object instance data within the fields. If a random number is not associated with the object, then a random number generator will be provided to ensure uniqueness across an enterprise system between unique identifiers. Thus, a unique identifier can be generated based upon the random number and the object instance data, even if such unique identifier did not previously exist. This generated unique identifier can be stored in the database and associated with the object, or temporarily stored in memory for purposes of locating the object associated with the requested unique identifier. For instance, it may be desirable to keep separateness of instance data and various other identifying indicia in the database, rather than condensing that data into a unique identifier.
At 1110, the directory call is returned with location of the object associated with the matching unique identifier. The methodology 1100 is beneficial over conventional methods of directory-assisted location of objects, as the methodology 1100 utilizes data that is often employed in a manufacturing environment to uniquely identify objects. The methodology 1100 is further compatible with previous indexing schema, such as employing GUIDs or other identifiers generated in a UUID format.
Turning now to
At 1208, the generated unique identifiers are associated with corresponding objects in the database. For example, a unique identifier can be stored in a row with a corresponding object. At 1210, a search is performed over the objects in the database via the unique identifiers by employing a single set of algorithms. As the unique identifiers are created by a common set of algorithms regardless of object instance data associated with a corresponding object, a common set of algorithms can be employed to index/search over the objects via the unique identifiers. Thus, a search for objects generated on a particular day can be utilized without requiring separate indexing of objects associated with sequence numbers.
With reference to
The system bus 1318 can be any of several types of bus structure(s) including the memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus or external bus, and/or a local bus using any variety of available bus architectures including, but not limited to, 11-bit bus, Industrial Standard Architecture (ISA), Micro-Channel Architecture (MSA), Extended ISA (EISA), Intelligent Drive Electronics (IDE), VESA Local Bus (VLB), Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), Universal Serial Bus (USB), Advanced Graphics Port (AGP), Personal Computer Memory Card International Association bus (PCMCIA), and Small Computer Systems Interface (SCSI).
The system memory 1316 includes volatile memory 1320 and nonvolatile memory 1322. The basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines to transfer information between elements within the computer 1312, such as during start-up, is stored in nonvolatile memory 1322. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory 1322 can include read only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory 1320 includes random access memory (RAM), which acts as external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms such as synchronous RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), Synchlink DRAM (SLDRAM), and direct Rambus RAM (DRRAM).
Computer 1312 also includes removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.
It is to be appreciated that
A user enters commands or information into the computer 1312 through input device(s) 1336. Input devices 1336 include, but are not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, TV tuner card, digital camera, digital video camera, web camera, and the like. These and other input devices connect to the processing unit 1314 through the system bus 1318 via interface port(s) 1338. Interface port(s) 1338 include, for example, a serial port, a parallel port, a game port, and a universal serial bus (USB). Output device(s) 1340 use some of the same type of ports as input device(s) 1336. Thus, for example, a USB port may be used to provide input to computer 1312, and to output information from computer 1312 to an output device 1340. Output adapter 1342 is provided to illustrate that there are some output devices 1340 like monitors, speakers, and printers, among other output devices 1340, which require special adapters. The output adapters 1342 include, by way of illustration and not limitation, video and sound cards that provide a means of connection between the output device 1340 and the system bus 1318. It should be noted that other devices and/or systems of devices provide both input and output capabilities such as remote computer(s) 1344.
Computer 1312 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as remote computer(s) 1344. The remote computer(s) 1344 can be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a workstation, a microprocessor based appliance, a peer device or other common network node and the like, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to computer 1312. For purposes of brevity, only a memory storage device 1346 is illustrated with remote computer(s) 1344. Remote computer(s) 1344 is logically connected to computer 1312 through a network interface 1348 and then physically connected via communication connection 1350. Network interface 1348 encompasses communication networks such as local-area networks (LAN) and wide-area networks (WAN). LAN technologies include Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), Copper Distributed Data Interface (CDDI), Ethernet/IEEE 1102.3, Token Ring/IEEE 1102.5 and the like. WAN technologies include, but are not limited to, point-to-point links, circuit switching networks like Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDN) and variations thereon, packet switching networks, and Digital Subscriber Lines (DSL).
Communication connection(s) 1350 refers to the hardware/software employed to connect the network interface 1348 to the bus 1318. While communication connection 1350 is shown for illustrative clarity inside computer 1312, it can also be external to computer 1312. The hardware/software necessary for connection to the network interface 1348 includes, for exemplary purposes only, internal and external technologies such as, modems including regular telephone grade modems, cable modems and DSL modems, ISDN adapters, and Ethernet cards.
What has been described above includes examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4268901||21 Aug 1975||19 May 1981||Ing. C. Olivetti & C., S.P.A.||Variable configuration accounting machine with automatic identification of the number and type of connected peripheral units|
|US4347564||25 Jun 1980||31 Aug 1982||Hitachi, Ltd.||Hierarchical-structure plant control system|
|US4623964||22 Dec 1982||18 Nov 1986||International Business Machines Corporation||Homogeneous hierarchial computer business system|
|US4990838||3 Jan 1990||5 Feb 1991||Atr Auditory And Visual Perception Research Laboratories||Movement trajectory generating method of a dynamical system|
|US5065429 *||14 Oct 1990||12 Nov 1991||Lang Gerald S||Method and apparatus for protecting material on storage media|
|US5072374||7 Nov 1989||10 Dec 1991||Ge Fanuc Automation North America, Inc.||Method for communicating among a plurality of programmable logic controllers each having a dma controller|
|US5117351 *||21 Oct 1988||26 May 1992||Digital Equipment Corporation||Object identifier generator for distributed computer system|
|US5185708||18 Jun 1990||9 Feb 1993||Ge Fanuc Automation North America, Inc.||Method for collecting data by a manufacturing process manager from a plurality of programmable logic controllers|
|US5191611 *||18 Jan 1991||2 Mar 1993||Lang Gerald S||Method and apparatus for protecting material on storage media and for transferring material on storage media to various recipients|
|US5253184||19 Jun 1991||12 Oct 1993||Storage Technology Corporation||Failure and performance tracking system|
|US5301320||28 Jun 1991||5 Apr 1994||Digital Equipment Corporation||Workflow management and control system|
|US5446868||11 Sep 1992||29 Aug 1995||R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company||Network bridge method and apparatus|
|US5455775||25 Jan 1993||3 Oct 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Computer design system for mapping a logical hierarchy into a physical hierarchy|
|US5485620||25 Feb 1994||16 Jan 1996||Automation System And Products, Inc.||Integrated control system for industrial automation applications|
|US5504891||13 Jun 1994||2 Apr 1996||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for format conversion of a hierarchically structured page description language document|
|US5537585||25 Feb 1994||16 Jul 1996||Avail Systems Corporation||Data storage management for network interconnected processors|
|US5557790 *||21 Jun 1994||17 Sep 1996||International Business Machines Corp.||Facility for the generic storage and management of multimedia objects|
|US5572731||29 Jun 1993||5 Nov 1996||Hewlett-Packard Company||Sequentially navigated object oriented computer system|
|US5581765 *||30 Aug 1994||3 Dec 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||System for combining a global object identifier with a local object address in a single object pointer|
|US5608903 *||15 Dec 1994||4 Mar 1997||Novell, Inc.||Method and apparatus for moving subtrees in a distributed network directory|
|US5611059||2 Sep 1994||11 Mar 1997||Square D Company||Prelinked parameter configuration, automatic graphical linking, and distributed database configuration for devices within an automated monitoring/control system|
|US5619724||10 Aug 1994||8 Apr 1997||Databook Incorporated||System for assigning a unique identifier to components by storing a bit sequence from a selected bit line after detecting a predetermined sequence of data|
|US5634048||13 Mar 1995||27 May 1997||Fujitsu Limited||Distributed database system having a center system with a link file and a method for retrieving data from same|
|US5644740||30 Nov 1993||1 Jul 1997||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for displaying items of information organized in a hierarchical structure|
|US5675748||8 Mar 1996||7 Oct 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for automatically configuring computer system hardware and software|
|US5715413||25 Jun 1996||3 Feb 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Dragging and dropping with an instantiation object|
|US5721905||6 Feb 1995||24 Feb 1998||U.S. Philips Corporation||Communication system comprising a distributed database system|
|US5761499||21 Dec 1995||2 Jun 1998||Novell, Inc.||Method for managing globally distributed software components|
|US5797137||26 Mar 1996||18 Aug 1998||Golshani; Forouzan||Method for converting a database schema in relational form to a schema in object-oriented form|
|US5812773||12 Jul 1996||22 Sep 1998||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for the distribution of hierarchically structured data|
|US5813020 *||31 Jul 1995||22 Sep 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for dynamic presentation parameter override during document interchange|
|US5828851||12 Apr 1996||27 Oct 1998||Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Process control system using standard protocol control of standard devices and nonstandard devices|
|US5832486||19 Nov 1996||3 Nov 1998||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Distributed database system having master and member sub-systems connected through a network|
|US5832487 *||14 Dec 1996||3 Nov 1998||Novell, Inc.||Replicated object identification in a partitioned hierarchy|
|US5838563||12 Apr 1996||17 Nov 1998||Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc.||System for configuring a process control environment|
|US5848273||27 Oct 1995||8 Dec 1998||Unisys Corp.||Method for generating OLE automation and IDL interfaces from metadata information|
|US5862052||12 Apr 1996||19 Jan 1999||Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Process control system using a control strategy implemented in a layered hierarchy of control modules|
|US5884025||4 Feb 1997||16 Mar 1999||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||System for packet filtering of data packet at a computer network interface|
|US5884033||15 May 1996||16 Mar 1999||Spyglass, Inc.||Internet filtering system for filtering data transferred over the internet utilizing immediate and deferred filtering actions|
|US5913029||7 Feb 1997||15 Jun 1999||Portera Systems||Distributed database system and method|
|US5913217 *||30 Jun 1997||15 Jun 1999||Microsoft Corporation||Generating and compressing universally unique identifiers (UUIDs) using counter having high-order bit to low-order bit|
|US5924094||1 Nov 1996||13 Jul 1999||Current Network Technologies Corporation||Independent distributed database system|
|US5936539||19 Mar 1996||10 Aug 1999||Siemens Medical Systems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for automatic configuration of a network node|
|US5940294||12 Apr 1996||17 Aug 1999||Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc.||System for assisting configuring a process control environment|
|US5940854||16 Jan 1996||17 Aug 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Unique identifier for optical media|
|US5946681 *||28 Nov 1997||31 Aug 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of determining the unique ID of an object through analysis of attributes related to the object|
|US5951440||12 Jun 1998||14 Sep 1999||Reichlinger; Gary||Engine controller with operator interface|
|US5960420||2 Sep 1997||28 Sep 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Systems, methods and computer program products for implementing a workflow engine in database management system|
|US5966705||30 Jun 1997||12 Oct 1999||Microsoft Corporation||Tracking a user across both secure and non-secure areas on the Internet, wherein the users is initially tracked using a globally unique identifier|
|US5978577||17 Mar 1995||2 Nov 1999||Csg Systems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for transaction processing in a distributed database system|
|US5980078||14 Feb 1997||9 Nov 1999||Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Process control system including automatic sensing and automatic configuration of devices|
|US5983016||12 Nov 1996||9 Nov 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Execution engine in an object modeling tool|
|US6005943 *||29 Oct 1996||21 Dec 1999||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Electronic identifiers for network terminal devices|
|US6011899||13 Nov 1996||4 Jan 2000||Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd.||Packet data system recording time stamps and packet data on tracks formed on a storage medium in synchronism with changes in time stamp values|
|US6032208||12 Apr 1996||29 Feb 2000||Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Process control system for versatile control of multiple process devices of various device types|
|US6044217||23 Oct 1997||28 Mar 2000||International Business Machines Corporation||Hierarchical metadata store for an integrated development environment|
|US6063129||3 Feb 1998||16 May 2000||The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland||Means and method for system performance tracking|
|US6081899||9 Jan 1998||27 Jun 2000||Netscape Communications Corporation||Time stamp authority hierarchy protocol and associated validating system|
|US6098116||12 Apr 1996||1 Aug 2000||Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc.||Process control system including a method and apparatus for automatically sensing the connection of devices to a network|
|US6101531||15 Apr 1998||8 Aug 2000||Motorola, Inc.||System for communicating user-selected criteria filter prepared at wireless client to communication server for filtering data transferred from host to said wireless client|
|US6135646 *||28 Feb 1997||24 Oct 2000||Corporation For National Research Initiatives||System for uniquely and persistently identifying, managing, and tracking digital objects|
|US6182064 *||6 Mar 1998||30 Jan 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for identifying an object located among a number of multiple interconnected computing systems|
|US6195591||11 Dec 1998||27 Feb 2001||Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Process control system using a process control strategy distributed among multiple control elements|
|US6208987||15 Jul 1998||27 Mar 2001||Nec Corporation||Hierarchically structured indexed information retrieval system|
|US6234899||20 Jul 1999||22 May 2001||Scientific Games, Inc.||System for linking a unique identifier to an instant game ticket|
|US6256740 *||6 Feb 1998||3 Jul 2001||Ncr Corporation||Name service for multinode system segmented into I/O and compute nodes, generating guid at I/O node and exporting guid to compute nodes via interconnect fabric|
|US6266726||18 Aug 1998||24 Jul 2001||Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Process control system using standard protocol control-of standard devices and non-standard devices|
|US6275977||7 Dec 1998||14 Aug 2001||Hitachi, Ltd.||Application cooperation method and apparatus|
|US6308168||9 Feb 1999||23 Oct 2001||Knowledge Discovery One, Inc.||Metadata-driven data presentation module for database system|
|US6308224||28 Mar 1997||23 Oct 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of generating an implementation of a workflow process model in an object environment|
|US6311187||29 Dec 1998||30 Oct 2001||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Propogating updates efficiently in hierarchically structured data under a push model|
|US6327511||30 Dec 1998||4 Dec 2001||Schneider Automation, Inc.||Input/output (I/O) scanner for a control system with peer determination|
|US6336152||4 Oct 1999||1 Jan 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Method for automatically configuring devices including a network adapter without manual intervention and without prior configuration information|
|US6356920||8 Mar 1999||12 Mar 2002||X-Aware, Inc||Dynamic, hierarchical data exchange system|
|US6377957||29 Dec 1998||23 Apr 2002||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Propogating updates efficiently in hierarchically structured date|
|US6393566||28 Jul 1995||21 May 2002||National Institute Of Standards And Technology||Time-stamp service for the national information network|
|US6398106||6 Nov 2000||4 Jun 2002||Canada Post Corporation||Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bars|
|US6409082||22 Jul 1998||25 Jun 2002||Perseu Administration (Proprietary) Limited||Tracking of products|
|US6411987||2 Feb 1999||25 Jun 2002||National Instruments Corporation||Industrial automation system and method having efficient network communication|
|US6415983||26 Feb 1999||9 Jul 2002||Canada Post Corporation||Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes|
|US6425051||25 Sep 2000||23 Jul 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system, program, and data structures for enabling a controller accessing a storage device to handle requests to data in a first data format when the storage device includes data in a second data format|
|US6438744||15 Jul 1998||20 Aug 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Dynamic mapping of component interfaces|
|US6445963||4 Oct 1999||3 Sep 2002||Fisher Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Integrated advanced control blocks in process control systems|
|US6446202||4 Oct 1999||3 Sep 2002||Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.||Process control configuration system for use with an AS-Interface device network|
|US6457053||21 Sep 1998||24 Sep 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Multi-master unique identifier allocation|
|US6469986||22 Oct 1998||22 Oct 2002||Electronic Data Systems Corporation||Method and system for configuring a network management network|
|US6473656||20 Jun 1997||29 Oct 2002||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Process automation system|
|US6484061||15 Dec 2000||19 Nov 2002||Schneider Automation Inc.||Web interface to a programmable controller|
|US6501996||3 Jul 1997||31 Dec 2002||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Process automation system|
|US6505247||2 Feb 1999||7 Jan 2003||National Instruments Corporation||Industrial automation system and method for efficiently transferring time-sensitive and quality-sensitive data|
|US6510352||28 Jul 2000||21 Jan 2003||The Foxboro Company||Methods and apparatus for object-based process control|
|US6539271||27 Dec 2000||25 Mar 2003||General Electric Company||Quality management system with human-machine interface for industrial automation|
|US6539430||30 Nov 1999||25 Mar 2003||Symantec Corporation||System and method for filtering data received by a computer system|
|US6539458||24 Apr 2001||25 Mar 2003||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Hierarchical memory for efficient data exchange control|
|US6631519||30 Mar 2000||7 Oct 2003||Microsoft Corporation||Automated schema and interface generation|
|US6643555||10 Oct 2000||4 Nov 2003||Schneider Automation Inc.||Method and apparatus for generating an application for an automation control system|
|US6661426||22 Sep 2000||9 Dec 2003||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||User interface generation|
|US6664981||13 Aug 2001||16 Dec 2003||Apple Computer, Inc.||Graphical user interface with hierarchical structure for customizable menus and control objects|
|US6681227||18 Nov 1998||20 Jan 2004||Ns Solutions Corporation||Database system and a method of data retrieval from the system|
|US6687707 *||28 Nov 1997||3 Feb 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Unique object identification in a network of computing systems|
|US6687817||14 Nov 2000||3 Feb 2004||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Configuration of a network device via the network|
|US6697797||28 Apr 2000||24 Feb 2004||Micro Data Base Systems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for tracking data in a database, employing last-known location registers|
|US6704746||12 Dec 2000||9 Mar 2004||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for lazy instantiation of objects in a virtual machine|
|US6714949||25 Apr 2000||30 Mar 2004||Adaptec, Inc.||Dynamic file system configurations|
|US6714981||7 Feb 2000||30 Mar 2004||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Addressing system and method for communicating data|
|US6738821||24 Jan 2000||18 May 2004||Adaptec, Inc.||Ethernet storage protocol networks|
|US6745089||1 Feb 2001||1 Jun 2004||California Institute Of Technology||Adaptable state based control system|
|US6748486||4 Jan 2001||8 Jun 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system, and data structures for superimposing data records in a first data format to memory in a second data format|
|US6751634||26 Aug 1999||15 Jun 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for detecting object inconsistency in a loosely consistent replicated directory service|
|US6751667 *||6 Oct 2000||15 Jun 2004||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||System for generating unique identifiers in a computer network|
|US6758403||11 Sep 2001||6 Jul 2004||Psc Scanning, Inc.||System for editing data collection device message data|
|US6760721||14 Apr 2000||6 Jul 2004||Realnetworks, Inc.||System and method of managing metadata data|
|US6760732||6 Sep 2001||6 Jul 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for viewing a record of an organization having a hierarchy of departments|
|US6763395||10 Apr 2000||13 Jul 2004||National Instruments Corporation||System and method for connecting to and viewing live data using a standard user agent|
|US6766312||31 Jan 2001||20 Jul 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for a random number generator|
|US6769095||27 Nov 2000||27 Jul 2004||Codagen Technologies Corp.||Hierarchically structured control information editor|
|US6778537||14 Jul 2000||17 Aug 2004||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Data processing system and time stamp creating method|
|US6801822||1 Sep 2000||5 Oct 2004||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Production management system, client in the production management system, production management method in the production management system, data retrieval method in the production management system, and computer product|
|US6807632||21 Jan 1999||19 Oct 2004||Emc Corporation||Content addressable information encapsulation, representation, and transfer|
|US6809732||13 Dec 2002||26 Oct 2004||Nvidia Corporation||Method and apparatus for generation of programmable shader configuration information from state-based control information and program instructions|
|US6836892||26 Jun 2003||28 Dec 2004||Hitachi, Ltd.||Apparatus and method for use in distributed computing environment for converting data format between program language-specific format used in respective computers and stream format used for communication among computers|
|US6839790||21 Jun 2002||4 Jan 2005||Smar Research Corporation||Plug and play reconfigurable USB interface for industrial fieldbus network access|
|US6842769||5 May 2000||11 Jan 2005||Interland, Inc.||Automatically configured network server|
|US6853920||9 Mar 2001||8 Feb 2005||Smiths Detection-Pasadena, Inc.||Control for an industrial process using one or more multidimensional variables|
|US6865509||9 Mar 2001||8 Mar 2005||Smiths Detection - Pasadena, Inc.||System for providing control to an industrial process using one or more multidimensional variables|
|US6868413||10 May 2001||15 Mar 2005||Networks Associates Technology, Inc.||System and method for customizing and processing business logic rules in a business process system|
|US6874145||16 Dec 1999||29 Mar 2005||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for implementing an application lifecycle design for applications|
|US6874146||30 Jun 1999||29 Mar 2005||Unisys Corporation||Metadata driven system for effecting extensible data interchange based on universal modeling language (UML), meta object facility (MOF) and extensible markup language (XML) standards|
|US6880060||24 Apr 2002||12 Apr 2005||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method for storing metadata in a physical sector|
|US6889282||25 Jun 2001||3 May 2005||Abb Patent Gmbh||Fieldbus connecting system for actuators or sensors|
|US6901578||6 Dec 1999||31 May 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Data processing activity lifecycle control|
|US6904473||31 Jul 2002||7 Jun 2005||Xyratex Technology Limited||Direct memory access controller and method of filtering data during data transfer from a source memory to a destination memory|
|US6920474||25 Mar 2003||19 Jul 2005||Data Quality Solutions, Inc.||Method and system for enterprise business process management|
|US6928521||1 Aug 2000||9 Aug 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system, and data structures for using metadata in updating data in a storage device|
|US6930985||26 Oct 2000||16 Aug 2005||Extreme Networks, Inc.||Method and apparatus for management of configuration in a network|
|US6934749||26 Sep 2000||23 Aug 2005||Ciena Corporation||Tracking distributed data retrieval in a network device|
|US6938079||19 Sep 2000||30 Aug 2005||3Com Corporation||System and method for automatically configuring a client device|
|US6944626||26 Nov 2001||13 Sep 2005||Microsoft Corp.||Dynamically generated schema representing multiple hierarchies of inter-object relationships|
|US6947947||4 Mar 2002||20 Sep 2005||Universal Business Matrix Llc||Method for adding metadata to data|
|US6950900||27 Sep 2000||27 Sep 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for migrating data having a format of a first type to a format of a second type|
|US6954770||23 Aug 2001||11 Oct 2005||Cavium Networks||Random number generator|
|US6961728||11 Mar 2002||1 Nov 2005||Centerboard, Inc.||System and methods for highly distributed wide-area data management of a network of data sources through a database interface|
|US6973556||29 Dec 2000||6 Dec 2005||Storage Technology Corporation||Data element including metadata that includes data management information for managing the data element|
|US6975913||12 Sep 2001||13 Dec 2005||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Database system and method for industrial automation services|
|US7016976 *||31 May 2001||21 Mar 2006||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||UniqueID-based addressing in a directory server|
|US7124305 *||7 Jan 2004||17 Oct 2006||Permabit, Inc.||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US7127613 *||25 Feb 2002||24 Oct 2006||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Secured peer-to-peer network data exchange|
|US7127724 *||3 Feb 1999||24 Oct 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for providing protocol independent naming and life cycle services in an object-oriented system|
|US7178033 *||31 May 2002||13 Feb 2007||Pss Systems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for securing digital assets|
|US7249181 *||15 Apr 2004||24 Jul 2007||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Generating unique identifiers in a computer system|
|US7265854 *||24 Jan 2000||4 Sep 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for managing complex presentation objects using globally-unique identifiers|
|US7287030 *||7 Jan 2004||23 Oct 2007||Burnside Acquisition, Llc||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20020012401||17 May 2001||31 Jan 2002||Endevco Corporation||Transducer network bus|
|US20020013748||30 May 2001||31 Jan 2002||Kelvin Edmison||Metadata-driven statistics processing|
|US20020038296 *||16 Feb 2001||28 Mar 2002||Margolus Norman H.||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20020069167||3 Dec 2001||6 Jun 2002||James Conlow||System and method for efficient presentment and payment of bills from multiple independent entities in a hierarchically structured business project|
|US20020073236||12 Jan 2001||13 Jun 2002||Helgeson Christopher S.||Method and apparatus for managing data exchange among systems in a network|
|US20020087786||4 Jan 2001||4 Jul 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system, and data structures for superimposing data records in a first data format to memory in a second data format|
|US20020091838||8 Feb 2002||11 Jul 2002||Pilz Gmbh & Co.||Method for adjusting the data transmission rate in a fieldbus system|
|US20020103785||26 Oct 1999||1 Aug 2002||Richard Hans Harvey||Metadata in directory service systems and methods|
|US20020131764 *||4 Dec 2001||19 Sep 2002||David Morgan William Amos||Identifying, recording and reproducing information|
|US20020194577||31 May 2001||19 Dec 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||System, method, and computer program product for creating a hierarchy of software components based on the programming constructs therein|
|US20030014387||12 Sep 2001||16 Jan 2003||Volker Kreidler||Database system and method for industrial automation services|
|US20030065673||30 Sep 2002||3 Apr 2003||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and device for marking and filtering data elements in a database|
|US20030088708 *||3 Feb 1999||8 May 2003||Stephen Lewallen||Method and apparatus for providing protocol independent naming and life cycle services in an object-oriented system|
|US20030090514||20 Sep 2002||15 May 2003||Cole Douglas J.||Business process user interface generation system and method|
|US20030120710||19 Sep 2002||26 Jun 2003||Darren Pulsipher||Hierarchically structured logging for computer work processing|
|US20030123467||6 Dec 2002||3 Jul 2003||U.S. Philips Corporation||Local area network with a bridge terminal for transmitting data between a plurality of sub-networks|
|US20030126308||30 Oct 2002||3 Jul 2003||Ho-Sam Kim||Method for processing events having hierarchical structure in communication equipment|
|US20030177114||13 Mar 2003||18 Sep 2003||Agile Software Corporation||System and method for where-used searches for data stored in a multi-level hierarchical structure|
|US20030212828||20 Aug 2002||13 Nov 2003||Kunihiko Miyazaki||Time stamp generating system|
|US20030218641||27 Mar 2003||27 Nov 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for navigating a hierarchical structure in a data processing system|
|US20040006401||7 Jul 2003||8 Jan 2004||Tsutomu Yamada||Data format conversion method and equipment,and controller management system using data format conversion equipment|
|US20040024995||28 Jan 2003||5 Feb 2004||Swaine Andrew Brookfield||Instruction tracing in data processing systems|
|US20040044421||11 Oct 2001||4 Mar 2004||Thomas Brune||Method for the data exchange between network devices|
|US20040073565||30 Apr 2003||15 Apr 2004||Kaufman Michael Philip||System and method for generating automatic user interface for arbitrarily complex or large databases|
|US20040098153||14 Nov 2003||20 May 2004||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method and data network for automatically configuring a parameterizing surface of machine tools or production machines|
|US20040139098 *||7 Jan 2004||15 Jul 2004||Permabit, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20040139303 *||7 Jan 2004||15 Jul 2004||Permabit, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Data repository and method for promoting network storage data|
|US20040143578 *||7 Jan 2004||22 Jul 2004||Permabit, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20040143743 *||7 Jan 2004||22 Jul 2004||Permabit, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20040143744 *||7 Jan 2004||22 Jul 2004||Permabit, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20040143745 *||7 Jan 2004||22 Jul 2004||Permabit, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20040148326 *||24 Jan 2003||29 Jul 2004||Nadgir Neelakanth M.||System and method for unique naming of resources in networked environments|
|US20040156075 *||3 Feb 2004||12 Aug 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for managing complex presentation objects using globally-unique identifiers|
|US20040162808 *||7 Jan 2004||19 Aug 2004||Permabit, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20040167790||24 Feb 2003||26 Aug 2004||Grasse Robert De||Method of conducting business in a system requiring frequency up-dates and corrections|
|US20040187015 *||21 Mar 2003||23 Sep 2004||Kenneth J. Geer||Generating numbers for use in product identifications|
|US20040196855||3 Apr 2003||7 Oct 2004||U4Ea Technologies Limited||Prioritizing data with flow control|
|US20040199655||3 Apr 2003||7 Oct 2004||U4Ea Technologies Limited||Allocating priority levels in a data flow|
|US20040203620||15 Oct 2002||14 Oct 2004||Timothy Thome||Method and apparatus for time stamp of electronic message|
|US20040210629||20 Jun 2003||21 Oct 2004||Klindt Charles J.||Interface to a programmable logic controller|
|US20040249771||17 Dec 2003||9 Dec 2004||Lisa Berg||Method of providing a unique identifier for a mailpiece|
|US20040255140 *||17 Jun 2004||16 Dec 2004||Permabit, Inc.||Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data|
|US20040260591||17 Jun 2003||23 Dec 2004||Oracle International Corporation||Business process change administration|
|US20050005289||29 Jun 2004||6 Jan 2005||Dirk Adolph||Method of linking metadata to a data stream|
|US20050021757 *||15 Apr 2004||27 Jan 2005||Helliwell Richard P.||Generating unique identifiers in a computer system|
|US20050044112||18 Aug 2004||24 Feb 2005||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Metadata processing method, metadata storing method, metadata adding apparatus, control program and recording medium, and contents displaying apparatus and contents imaging apparatus|
|US20050065829||30 Sep 2003||24 Mar 2005||Thomas Birkhoelzer||Workflow management system and method with continuous status management|
|US20050065971||17 Sep 2004||24 Mar 2005||Hajime Honda||Product lifecycle data management system and product lifecycle data management method|
|US20050069853||27 Sep 2004||31 Mar 2005||Tyson William Randal||Performance tracking systems and methods|
|US20050091349||29 Jul 2004||28 Apr 2005||Daniel Scheibli||Automatically configuring a computer|
|US20050097111 *||12 Jul 2004||5 May 2005||Arka Mukherjee||System and method for data integration using multi-dimensional, associative unique identifiers|
|US20050102672||12 Nov 2003||12 May 2005||Brothers William G.||Non-platform-specific unique identifier generation|
|US20050107897||14 Nov 2003||19 May 2005||Callaghan David M.||Dynamic browser-based industrial automation interface system and method|
|US20050108247||14 Jul 2004||19 May 2005||Ahti Heinla||Distributed database system|
|US20050108402 *||13 Nov 2003||19 May 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method enabling future messaging directives based on past participation via a history monitor|
|US20050120021||2 Dec 2003||2 Jun 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Metadata driven intelligent data navigation|
|US20050125625 *||9 Dec 2003||9 Jun 2005||Michael Kilian||Methods and apparatus for parsing a content address to facilitate selection of a physical storage location in a data storage system|
|US20050129247||9 Dec 2004||16 Jun 2005||Infineon Technologies Ag||Device and method for generating random numbers using a pseudo random number generator|
|US20050135782||6 Apr 2004||23 Jun 2005||Sony Corporation||Information processing apparatus for editing data|
|US20050144172 *||9 Dec 2003||30 Jun 2005||Michael Kilian||Methods and apparatus for generating a content address to indicate data units written to a storage system proximate in time|
|US20050154741||4 Nov 2004||14 Jul 2005||Cedric Hebert||Methods and computer systems for workflow management|
|US20050166215||27 Jan 2004||28 Jul 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Common user interface for interacting with various interfaces|
|US20050177687||10 Feb 2004||11 Aug 2005||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Storage system including hierarchical cache metadata|
|US20050187925||22 Feb 2005||25 Aug 2005||Diane Schechinger||Schechinger/Fennell System and method for filtering data search results by utilizing user selected checkboxes"|
|US20050198248||6 Oct 2004||8 Sep 2005||Fujitsu Limited||System layout design program, system layout design apparatus, and system layout design method for automatically configuring systems|
|US20050216460||26 May 2005||29 Sep 2005||Lg Electronics Inc.||User preference information structure having multiple hierarchical structure and method for providing multimedia information using the same|
|US20050223010||28 Mar 2005||6 Oct 2005||Paul Murray||Coordination of lifecycle changes of system components|
|US20050251527||7 May 2004||10 Nov 2005||Mark Phillips||System and method for integrating disparate data and application sources using a web services orchestration platform with business process execution language (BPEL)|
|US20050256788||10 May 2005||17 Nov 2005||Syunichi Mukai||Apparatus and method for tracking products|
|US20050268253||12 May 2005||1 Dec 2005||Redsky Mobile Inc.||Navigation of an N-dimensional hierarchical structure using a 2-dimensional controller|
|US20050278373||22 Sep 2004||15 Dec 2005||Steven Corbett||Data retrieval method|
|US20060004475||1 Jul 2004||5 Jan 2006||Abb Inc.||Incrementally accruing product and component quality and tracking data in the manufacturing of devices|
|US20060004847||30 Nov 2004||5 Jan 2006||Claudatos Christopher H||Content-driven information lifecycle management|
|1||Ambler. Enterprise Ready Object IDs, Internet article (Online), Jun. 29, 2001. pp. 1-2. XP 002440718. http://www.ddj.com/dept/architect/184415770. Last accessed Jul. 3, 2007.|
|2||*||Brown, Aaron, et al., "ISTORE: Introspective Storage for Data-Intensive Network Services", Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, Mar. 29-30, 1999, pp. 32-37.|
|3||CN OA dated Aug. 8, 2008 for Chinese Application No. 200510087521.6, 8 pages.|
|4||CN OA dated Feb. 15, 2008 for Chinese Application No. 200510087521.6, 25 pages.|
|5||EP OA dated Jan. 30, 2008 for European Application No. 05015698.3-1243, 1 page.|
|6||European Search Report dated Jun. 12, 2005 for European Patent Application Serial No. EP05016793, 3 pages.|
|7||European Search Report for European Patent Application No. EP 05015698 dated Sep. 8, 2007, 7 pgs.|
|8||*||Hnetynka, Petr, et al., "Distributed Versioning Model for MOF", WISICT, vol. 58, Cancun, Mexico, Jan. 5-8, 2004, pp. 1-6.|
|9||*||Homburg, Philip, et al., "An Architecture for a Wide Area Distributed System", Proc. Of the 7th Workshop on ACM SIGOPS European Workshop: Systems Support for Worldwide Applications, Connemara, Ireland, Sep. 9-11, 1996, pp. 75-82.|
|10||Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Internet Search Results Page (Online) Jul. 3, 2007. XP 002440660. http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stucker-sip-guid-00-txt>. Last accessed Jul. 3, 2007, 1 page.|
|11||John Kubiatowicz, et al.; OceanStore: An Architecture for Global-Scale Persistent Storage; ASPLOS 2000, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 2000.|
|12||*||Karp, Alan, et al., "The Client Utility as a Peer-to-Peer System", Networking 2002 Workshops, LNCS 2376, Springer, Berlin, Germany, © 2002, pp. 260-273.|
|13||*||Kubiatowicz, John, et al., "OceanStore: An Architecture for Global-Scale Persistent Storage", ASPLOS 2000, Cambridge, MA, Nov. 12-15, 1999, pp. 190-201.|
|14||*||Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th Edition, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, © 2002, p. 438.|
|15||*||Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th Edition, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, © 2002, pp. 553-555.|
|16||OA Dated Dec. 12, 2008 for CN Application Serial No. 200510087521.6, 7 pages.|
|17||Pitzek et al., Configuration and Management of a Real-Time Smart Transducer Network, 2003 IEEE, 2003, 4 pages.|
|18||*||Pitzek, Stefan, et al., "Configuration and Management of a Real-Time Smart Transducer Network", ETFA '03, vol. 1, Sep. 16-19, 2003, pp. 407-414.|
|19||Roy Goldman, et al.; From Semistructured Data to XML: Migrating the Lore Data Model and Query Language; 1999.|
|20||*||Van Steen, Maarten, et al., "A Model for Worldwide Tracking of Distributed Objects", Proc. of the 1996 Conf. on Telecommunications Information Networking Architecture, © 1996, pp. 1-13.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8117443 *||5 Oct 2005||14 Feb 2012||Oracle America, Inc.||Method and apparatus for generating location independent unique identifiers|
|US8209477 *||26 Jun 2012||Micron Technology, Inc.||Non-volatile memory device having assignable network identification|
|US8560766||7 Jun 2012||15 Oct 2013||Micron Technology, Inc.||Non-volatile memory device having assignable network identification|
|US9037545||19 Sep 2011||19 May 2015||Hybir Inc.||Group based complete and incremental computer file backup system, process and apparatus|
|US9146789||21 Mar 2006||29 Sep 2015||Oracle America, Inc.||Method and apparatus for generating and using location-independent distributed object references|
|US20120084493 *||5 Apr 2012||Micron Technology, Inc.||Non-volatile memory device having assignable network identification|
|US20120246287 *||27 Sep 2012||Opnet Technologies, Inc.||Correlating input and output requests between client and server components in a multi-tier application|
|U.S. Classification||707/803, 707/705|
|International Classification||G06F17/30, G06F7/00|
|21 Jul 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ROCKWELL SOFTWARE, INC., WISCONSIN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOOD, GAVAN W.;REEL/FRAME:015626/0088
Effective date: 20040720
|8 Sep 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4