For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.
For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.
FOXL2 Impairment in Human DiseaseVerdin H. · De Baere E.
Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium Corresponding Author
Elfride De Baere, MD, PhD
Center for Medical Genetics Ghent
Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185
BE-9000 Ghent (Belgium)
Tel. +32 9 332 5186, E-Mail firstname.lastname@example.org
FOXL2 encodes a forkhead transcription factor that plays important roles in the ovary during development and in post-natal, adult life. Here, we focus on the clinical consequences of FOXL2 impairment in human disease. In line with other forkhead transcription factors, its constitutional genetic defects and a somatic mutation lead to developmental disease and cancer, respectively. More than 100 unique constitutional mutations and regulatory defects have been found in blepharophimosis syndrome (BPES), a complex eyelid malformation associated (type I) or not (type II) with premature ovarian failure (POF). In agreement with the BPES phenotype, FOXL2 is expressed in the developing eyelids and in fetal and adult ovaries. Two knock-out mice and at least one natural animal model, the Polled Intersex Syndrome goat, are known. They recapitulate the BPES phenotype and have provided many insights into the ovarian pathology. Only a few constitutional mutations have been described in nonsyndromic POF. Moreover, a recurrent somatic mutation p.C134W was found to be specific for adult ovarian granulo-sa cell tumors. Functional studies investigating the consequences of FOXL2 mutations or regulatory defects have shed light on the molecular pathogenesis of the aforementioned conditions, and contributed considerably to genotype-phenotype correlations. Recently, a conditional knock-out of Foxl2 in the mouse induced somatic transdifferentiation of ovary into testis in adult mice, suggesting that Foxl2 has an anti-testis function in the adult ovary. This changed our view on the ovary and testis as terminally differentiated organs in adult mammals. Finally, this might have potential implications for the understanding and treatment of frequent conditions such as POF and polycystic ovary syndrome.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
FOXL2 is a single-exon gene of 2.7 kb encoding a highly conserved protein of 376 amino acids containing a 110-amino-acid DNA-binding forkhead domain, classifying FOXL2 in the family of forkhead transcription factors involved in a wide variety of biological processes during development and postnatal life. Besides the forkhead domain, FOXL2 also contains a polyalanine tract of 14 residues that is conserved in mammals; however, the exact function is unknown (fig. 1). As several forkhead transcription factors have a strict spatiotemporal expression pattern in early development, a mutation dysregulating this pattern could lead to developmental disease. Currently, 11 human forkhead genes have been shown to be mutated in human hereditary developmental disorders, four of which have an ocular phenotype . One of them is FOXL2, leading to blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome with or without ovarian dysfunction when mutated (BPES, OMIM 110100) . The expression pattern of FOXL2 is compatible with the BPES phenotype, as expression studies in human, mouse and goat demonstrated the presence of the nuclear protein in the mesenchyme of developing eyelids and in fetal and adult supporting granulosa cells but not in the oocytes. As FOXL2 expression in the ovary is observed before folliculogenesis, it is the earliest known marker of ovarian differentiation in mammals. Moreover, FOXL2 is strongly expressed in adult follicular cells, suggesting not only a role in ovarian somatic cell differentiation but also in adult female fertile life in follicular development and maintenance. FOXL2 expression has also been demonstrated in the developing pituitary, and in gonadotrope as well as thyrotrope cell types of the adult pituitary, suggesting an involvement in pituitary organogenesis [3,4,5,6].
Complex Eyelid Malformation
BPES is a rare developmental disorder of the eyelids and ovary essentially presenting with an autosomal dominant inheritance. Typically, four major characteristics of the eyelids are present at birth (fig. 2): (1) a reduction of the horizontal dimension of the palpebral fissures (blepharophimosis), (2) drooping of the upper eyelid leading to a narrowing of the vertical palpebral fissure (ptosis), (3) a small skin fold rising from the lower eyelid and running inwards and upwards (epicanthus inversus), and (4) a lateral displacement of the canthi with normal interpupillary distance (telecanthus). Besides this clinical tetrad, other ophthalmic features associate with BPES including nasolacrimal drainage problems caused by lateral displacement, duplication, or stenosis of the lacrimal puncta. Especially the lateral displacement of the inferior punctum is a relatively unknown and important anatomical hallmark for the clinical diagnosis of BPES . Minor features observed in BPES are a broad nasal bridge, low-set ears and a short philtrum . The eyelid malformation can be corrected with oculoplastic surgery for both aesthetic and functional reasons. Traditionally, a medial canthoplasty to correct the epicanthic folds is performed at the age of 3-5 years depending on the severity of the ptosis, followed by ptosis correction. Decock et al.  described two surgical procedures to correct ptosis, i.e. super-maximal resection and frontalis suspension. Indeed, super-maximal resection of the levator muscle is the preferred method as it leads to a good cosmetic outcome as well as to an improved muscle function.
Two types BPES can be clinically distinguished: both types have the clinical tetrad in common while in type I, premature ovarian failure (POF) manifests with the ocular phenotype . POF is defined as amenorrhea for at least 4 months before the age of 40 years, combined with a decreased serum concentration of estradiol and an increased serum concentration of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH >40 IU/l) . Only little is known about the molecular mechanisms of FOXL2 dysregulation in the ovary of a BPES patient. In a first report by Fraser et al. , small hypoplastic uteri and streak ovaries were observed in two sisters with BPES type I (age difference of 8 years) using ultrasonography. On ovarian biopsy, primordial follicles progressing into scars were described. No genetic study was performed however. A second unique study by Meduri et al.  included an extensive clinical, genetic, hormonal and ovarian histological investigation in two BPES type I patients. Histological and immunohistological studies were performed on ovarian biopsies from these 2 patients, in which FOXL2 elongating frameshift mutations were found. The ovarian histological phenotype of the first patient was similar to that observed in the knock-out mice, while that of the second patient was apparently normal (fig. 3). In both patients, FOXL2 protein expression was observed in the granulosa cells. In patient 1, a predominant intracytoplasmatic expression was detected, while on the contrary a predominant nuclear expression was seen in patient 2. Taken together, different ovarian phenotypes, follicular defects and distribution of FOXL2 protein were observed in these two patients with molecularly proven defects .
In female type I BPES patients, both emotional and physical management of POF is imperative. A first issue in the management of POF is the necessity of hormone replacement therapy to reduce postmenopausal symptoms and prevent long-term health effects of estrogen deficiency, such as an increased risk of osteoporosis . In general, POF reduces the chance of conceiving naturally to 5-10%. Of these pregnancies another 20% result in pregnancy loss . Currently, three fertility-preserving strategies are available: embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. The only established method is embryo cryopreservation. This option, however, is restricted to patients who have a partner or are willing to use donor sperm. This also requires a cycle of ovarian stimulation. For those patients without a partner or not willing to use donor sperm, oocyte cryopreservation can be performed. This strategy also requires a cycle of ovarian stimulation. The success rate of oocyte cryopreservation is however still very low with pregnancy rates ranging from 1 to 5% [15,16]. The aforementioned strategies are not suitable in prepubertal patients however, because of the necessity of ovarian stimulation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is in theory possible before puberty. The aim of this technique is to freeze ovarian cortex tissue, and then to reimplant the tissue orthotopically (into the pelvic cavity) or heterotopically (e.g. the forearm or abdominal wall). Orthotopic reimplantation allows the possibility of pregnancy without further reproductive medical assistance. On the contrary, heterotopic reimplantation needs to be followed by in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, because the revascularization after the reimplantation needs time to develop, ischemia damages the follicles resulting in massive follicle loss. Therefore, further research is needed to enhance the freezing and revascularization processes. To date, only 15 live births have been reported, none of which were derived from cryopreserved prepubertal tissue [15,16,17]. Of note, most BPES type I patients are diagnosed in infancy. Two other options that need to be considered are adoption and oocyte donation. The latter option gives the patient the chance of experiencing a pregnancy herself. Traditionally, fresh oocyte donations were performed, but these are hampered by inefficiency, difficulties of synchronization between recipient and donor, very long waiting periods and lack of quarantine measures. The advances in oocyte cryopreservation techniques with fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates comparable to fresh oocyte donation, diminishes the disadvantages of fresh oocyte donation and may become the new standard in the future . The fact that young patients are most often not ready to decide on their reproductive future and that the age of onset of POF cannot be predicted, makes counseling on fertility preservation very challenging.In general, BPES type I patients require a thorough follow-up of ovarian function by both an endocrinologist and gynecologist.
In 2001, FOXL2 was identified as the causal gene for BPES . Using a combined mutation detection approach consisting of (1) sequencing of the FOXL2 open reading frame, (2) copy number screening of the FOXL2 gene, and (3) copy number screening of the regulatory domain of FOXL2, the underlying molecular defect can be identified in 88% of typical BPES patients. Of all genetic defects identified, intragenic mutations represent the largest group (71%). Deletions encompassing FOXL2 and located outside its transcription unit represent 12 and 5% of molecular defects, respectively .
Intragenic mutations occur along the total coding region of FOXL2 and all types of mutations have been identified, mostly in BPES. More than 100 unique FOXL2 mutations have been described (http://medgen.ugent.be/FOXL2) . The largest group (44%) contains frameshift mutations. Following are the in-frame changes (33%), the nonsense mutations (12%) and finally the missense mutations (11%). Notably, 93% of the in-frame mutations lead to polyalanine expansions, representing the most important mutational hotspot in FOXL2 .
Several genotype-phenotype correlations emerged after the identification of the first mutations in FOXL2. Before any functional studies were done, it was proposed that mutations predicted to result in proteins with truncation before the poly-Ala tract might by associated with BPES type I, whereas polyalanine expansions might rather lead to BPES type II. For missense mutations and mutations leading to a truncated or extended protein containing an intact forkhead domain and polyalanine tract, no correlation could be made [20,21].
From the first mutation studies, it was hypothesized that these mutations were loss-of-function alleles leading to haploinsufficiency of FOXL2 [2,21]. This was supported by the observation that FOXL2 deletions and intragenic mutations lead to the same phenotype . However, the functional consequences were not clear for missense mutations.
Molecular Consequences of Intragenic Mutations
Most insights into the molecular effects of FOXL2 mutations contributing to genotype-phenotype correlations resulted from in vitro studies. The most frequent polyalanine expansion p.Ala224_Ala234dup was found to lead to intranuclear aggregation and cytoplasmic mislocalization of the protein, and to interfere with the availability of a co-expressed normal FOXL2 . This was corroborated by a potential promoter-specific dominant-negative effect of this polyalanine expansion . However, the fact that this mutation might keep partial transactivation capacity on high-affinity promoters might explain why its phenotypic expression is often mild (i.e. BPES without POF) .
Most missense mutations are located in the forkhead domain. A first study by Beysen et al.  suggested that missense mutations in the forkhead domain leading to mislocalization and aggregation, and thus severely impairing transactivation, would lead to a more severe ovarian phenotype than missense mutations not significantly affecting protein localization and function . In addition, two mutations downstream of the forkhead domain (p.S217F and p.S217C) were found to lead to a mild BPES phenotype . Dipietromaria et al.  developed a prediction tool for FOXL2 intragenic (missense and other) mutations, the validation of which was based on known phenotypic effects of a ‘training set' of mutations (BPES type I or type II). A clear correlation was found between the transcriptional activity of FOXL2 mutations on two different reporter promoters and the BPES type . In a very recent study by Todeschini et al. , the amino acids of the helices of the forkhead domain of FOXL2 were systematically replaced by glycine residues to assess the impact of these artificial mutations. A number of mutations led to protein mislocalization, aggregation and to partial or complete loss of transactivation ability on a dozen of luciferase reporter systems. No clear-cut correlation was found between protein mislocalization or aggregation and the position of the mutation. However, the localization of the side chain of each amino acid was found to correlate very well with the impact of its mutation on FOXL2 transactivation capacity. Extrapolation of this analysis to natural mutations was in agreement with the findings obtained for the artificial mutations. This study brought important insights into the molecular effects of FOXL2 missense mutations located in the forkhead domain, and provided an apparently reliable in silico predictive tool for their phenotypic effects .
Deletions of the FOXL2 gene have been identified in 10% of the BPES patients. These patients are phenotypically indistinguishable from those carrying intragenic mutations, emphasizing that correct gene dosage of FOXL2 is critical for normal development. The observed rearrangements range from partial and total FOXL2 deletions to microdeletions encompassing neighboring genes. Not only are the sizes of the deletions diverse, also the breakpoint locations are heterogeneous, indicating a lack of rearrangements hotspots. Genotype-phenotype correlations might be especially helpful in providing a prognosis in newborns with BPES, mainly regarding associated features such as psychomotor retardation and POF. FOXL2 deletions were found to lead to BPES type I. Genetic counseling and endocrinologic follow-up is therefore of utmost importance in BPES females carrying a FOXL2 deletion [27,28]. Other potential correlations such as an ATR deletion and microcephaly, and a SOX14 deletion and limb anomalies, are still elusive .
Before the identification of FOXL2 as the disease gene for BPES, three balanced translocations were found in BPES patients. Because the deletion breakpoints were located upstream of FOXL2, a position effect was assumed [27,29]. Recently, this hypothesis has been strengthened by the identification of several deletions outside the transcription unit of FOXL2 in typical BPES patients [27,30]. A very subtle deletion of only 7.4 kb defines the shortest region of overlap (SRO) encompassing 8 conserved noncoding sequences (CNCs) and a long noncoding RNA (lnc-RNA) named PISRT1 that is likely co-expressed with FOXL2 in human granulosa cells. This is in line with a presumed regulatory function of PISRT1, requiring a tissue and cell-type specific expression. The potential regulatory function of the CNCs was validated using in vitro luciferase assays in a FOXL2 expressing and nonexpressing cell line. Cell-type specific regulatory potential could be observed for the 3 CNCs located in the SRO. This supports that at least a fraction of the tested CNCs might be involved in the tissue-specific expression of FOXL2. Finally, chromosome conformation capture (3C) of a 625-kb region flanking FOXL2 was conducted in different cellular systems. In the FOXL2-expressing KGN cell line, the FOXL2 core promoter proved to come in close vicinity to 3 chromosomal fragments located upstream of FOXL2, of which 1 contains the 7.4-kb de-letion. Furthermore, all three distant sequences were found to mutually interact and contact the FOXL2 core promoter .
Apart from regulatory deletions, potentially interesting sequence variations have been found in the 3′ UTR of the FOXL2 transcription unit [31,32]. Their functional significance has not been studied so far however.
We proposed a decision tree for molecular genetic testing of BPES  (summarized in fig. 4). A first step in the diagnostic work-up of patients with a tentative diagnosis of BPES is a clinical classification of the patients into two groups: (1) typical BPES, and (2) BPES-like. Patients can be classified within the first group if: (1) the presence of four diagnostic criteria of BPES can be assessed (on a facial picture), including blepharophimosis, ptosis, epicanthus inversus and telecanthus, or (2) at least three of the four diagnostic criteria of BPES are mentioned on a standardized clinical questionnaire. Second, a different molecular diagnostic approach is required depending on the clinical classification. In case of typical BPES, the first step is direct sequencing of the FOXL2 open reading frame (ORF) as intragenic mutations can be detected in 72% of this group . If no mutations can be detected, FOXL2 deletion screening should be performed as a second step (e.g. using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or MLPA), as gene deletions are present in 10% of this group . If negative, copy number screening targeting the FOXL2 region (e.g. using quantitative polymerase chain reaction [qPCR] or microarray-based comparative genome hybridisation [array CGH]) is recommended as a third step to exclude the presence of regulatory copy number changes affecting the long-range genetic control of FOXL2 which have been reported in 4% of the cases [27,30]. In case of a BPES-like phenotype, genome-wide microarray-based copy number screening is recommended, as copy number changes can be detected in a relatively large proportion of these patients (33%) .
POF is defined as cessation of menses before the age of 40 for a period of at least 4 months. It is characterized by amenorrhea, hypoestrogenism and elevated serum gonadotrophin concentrations. This condition affects 1% of all women . Multiple causes can underlie POF, including iatrogenic factors, autoimmune disease, metabolic and infectious factors, genetic defects, such as X chromosome aberrations and mutations in autosomal genes. However, the cause remains unknown in the majority of POF patients. Because mutations in FOXL2 have been associated with a syndromic form of POF, namely BPES type I, it has been considered to be a candidate gene for non-syndromic POF. Mutation studies were conducted in several cohorts with non-syndromic POF [21,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. However, only in 3 patients a variation with a presumed pathogenic effect was found. First, a heterozygous 30-bp deletion was identified in a Slovenian POF patient resulting in a polyalanine contraction of 10 alanines. Interestingly, polyalanine expansions are known to cause BPES with or without POF. The patient presented with primary amenorrhea and hypergonadotrophic hypogonadism, but was still able to conceive spontaneously and give birth to two healthy children . Second, a heterozygous single nucleotide substitution (c.772T>A) leading to a nonconservative amino acid change, p.Y258N, was identified in a sporadic New Zealand POF patient. Both mutations were absent in 100 control samples . Third, variant p.G187D was found in a woman with POF in the absence of BPES. While FOXL2 localization was normal, the transactivation capacity of the mutant protein on two reporter promoters potentially relevant in an ovarian context proved to be lower than that of normal FOXL2 . These studies indicate that mutations in the FOXL2 coding region are not a frequent cause of isolated POF.
Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) represent less than 5% of all ovarian cancers. GCTs can be classified into adult and juvenile types based on different clinical and histopathologic features. Juvenile GCTs account for only 5% of all GCTs and typically occur in prepubertal girls and women younger than 30 years. These patients usually present at an early stage and have a good prognosis. On the other hand, adult GCTs occur most frequently in premenopausal women (fig. 5). Although GCTs may also present at an early stage of disease, relapses tend to occur 10-30 years after diagnosis with an estimated relapse rate of 18.6% and a mean survival rate of 5 years. Because of the tendency of a late relapse, a lifelong follow-up is advised . Because no effective treatment is available to date, patients with late relapses or advanced-stage tumors at diagnosis have a poor prognosis . Until recently, only little was known about the molecular basis of GCTs. Through whole-transcriptome paired-end RNA sequencing of only 4 GCTs, a somatic FOXL2 missense mutation c.402C>G (p.C134W) was found in all of them . The presence of this unique recurrent somatic mutation in more than 95% of adult GCTs has been confirmed by several follow-up studies [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Localization of the mutated protein was found to be normal [43,44]. Differences have been found between wild-type and mutant FOXL2 however, such as increased induction of the target aromatase by the mutation  and a lower capacity of the mutation to induce apoptosis, thereby compromising cell death [47,48,53]. A very recent study by Benayoun et al.  suggested that this mutation might interfere with the capacity of FOXL2 to modulate the cell cycle.
In conclusion, the identification of this recurrent adult GCT-specific FOXL2 mutation is a step forward for the diagnosis of adult GCTs, and might help to develop more targeted therapies and to elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of adult GCTs.
Two Foxl2 knock-out mice have been reported [55,56]. The perinatal lethality observed in the Foxl2 knock-out mice is high . The craniofacial phenotype of the surviving homozygous animals recapitulates the BPES phenotype, with a severe eyelid malformation, and open eyes at birth .
Female homozygous mice are sterile with small and disorganized ovaries and lack of primary follicles [55,56]. There are some differences between the two models however: in the first model by Schmidt et al. , a correct formation of primordial follicles was seen, with normal oocytes but granulosa cells that did not undergo the normal squamous to cuboidal transition; in the second model by Uda et al. , disorganized ovaries were seen instead of normal primordial follicles, suggesting an earlier defect. In both models, oocytes seem to be intact during the first stages of folliculogenesis and perinatally. Shortly thereafter, the follicular reserve is depleted by a massive follicular atresia leading to sterility [55,56].
Interestingly, several findings in animal models pointed to a testis-suppressing role of Foxl2 in the developing and adult ovary. First, this was suggested by observations in the Polled Intersex Syndrome goat. In the only natural animal model for BPES, a regulatory region upstream of goat FOXL2 is deleted, resulting in absence of horns and sex reversal in XX animals . Second, similar findings in Foxl2-/- female mice further sustained an ‘anti-testis' role of Foxl2 in ovarian development [58,59]. Indeed, Foxl2-/- granulosa cells in mice acquire (male) Sertoli-like characteristics . Third, a recent study dealing with a conditional knock-out of Foxl2 in mice provided evidence for an ‘anti-testis' role of Foxl2 in the adult ovary. Indeed, loss of Foxl2 in the adult ovary was shown to result in somatic transdifferentiation of the granulosa and thecal cells into testis-specific Sertoli- and Leydig-like cells, respectively. Moreover, this led to an immediate upregulation of testis-specific genes such as Sox9, assuming repression of Sox9 by Foxl2 . The latter study profoundly changed our view on the ovary and testis as terminally differentiated organs in adult mammals. Finally, these studies might help to elucidate the molecular basis of SRY-negative XX sex reversal cases, although an initial study did not reveal any FOXL2 mu-tation . Finally, these findings might have potential implications for the understanding of more frequent conditions such as POF and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
In the previous study, the conditional deletion of Foxl2 in mice did not only transdifferentiate granulosa cells to testis-specific Sertoli-like cells, but also a change of thecal cells into Leydig-like cells, associated with an increase in androgen production. These findings are reminiscent of PCOS, the most common ovarian dysfunction in women in their reproductive life, as suggested by Murphy . Although a link between FOXL2 dysregulation and PCOS has not yet been demonstrated clearly in humans, constitutional FOXL2 mutations found in syndromic POF (BPES type I) associated withandrogen-induced hirsutism , and in a BPES patient with reported PCOS  might represent first hints. However, it should be noted that PCOS is very common in the general population (6-10%) and can go up to 52% in the Indian subcontinent [63,64]. So it will be challenging to substantiate the connection between FOXL2 disruption and PCOS in future research.
Keloid is a dermal fibroproliferative growth caused by pathologic wound healing following skin injury, and can be defined as a hypertrophic scar growing beyond the borders of the original wound . A recent genomewide association study investigating 824 individuals with keloid (cases) and 3,205 unaffected controls in the Japanese population identified significant associations of keloid with four SNP loci in three chromosomal regions, one of which is 3q22.3-23 . This region, with strong association with SNP rs1511412, included two genes: LOC389151, a hypothetical gene located 24 kb telomeric to rs1511412, and FOXL2, located 47 kb centromeric to rs1511412. Although speculative, a link between genetic variations influencing FOXL2 expression and keloid susceptibility might be found in potential effects on the levels of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and/or steroid hormones. On the one hand, FOXL2 is known to regulate the expression of GnRH and cholesterol metabolism and steroidogenesis, and on the other hand, it has been assumed that gonadal and steroid hormones might influence keloid formation .
Mutations in FOXL2 illustrate the concept of pleiotropy and clinical heterogeneity. More than 100 unique constitutional FOXL2 mutations and multiple copy number changes of the FOXL2 region, and one unique recurrent somatic mutation have been described in human disease, varying from a rare developmental condition with manifestations in the ovary and eyelid to a specific tumor in adulthood.Functional studies investigating the con-sequences of FOXL2 mutations or regulatory defects considerably contributed to genotype-phenotype correlations, opening perspectives for fertility preservation. More importantly, an intact FOXL2 function is not only crucial during development but is also needed throughout the lifetime of a female to prevent ovarian dysfunction, somatic transdifferentiation and tumor formation. In this way, researchers might be challenged by further dissection of the molecular pathogenesis of SRY-negative XX sex reversal, and more frequent conditions such as POF and PCOS. In order to provide potential targets for therapy, further insights into the regulation of expression of FOXL2 and into potential ‘druggability' of its downstream targets are needed. This might ultimately lead to treatment perspectives for (one of) the conditions resulting from FOXL2 impairment.
H.V. is doctoral fellow from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO). E.D.B. is a senior clinical investigator from the FWO. This study is supported by FWO grant G079711N.
Elfride De Baere, MD, PhD
Center for Medical Genetics Ghent
Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185
BE-9000 Ghent (Belgium)
Tel. +32 9 332 5186, E-Mail email@example.com
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.