|Numéro de publication||US6509809 B1|
|Type de publication||Octroi|
|Numéro de demande||US 09/650,316|
|Date de publication||21 janv. 2003|
|Date de dépôt||29 août 2000|
|Date de priorité||27 mai 1999|
|État de paiement des frais||Caduc|
|Autre référence de publication||CN1352815A, EP1181739A1, US6127901, WO2000074169A1|
|Numéro de publication||09650316, 650316, US 6509809 B1, US 6509809B1, US-B1-6509809, US6509809 B1, US6509809B1|
|Inventeurs||Jonathan J. Lynch|
|Cessionnaire d'origine||Hrl Laboratories, Llc|
|Exporter la citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citations de brevets (7), Référencé par (25), Classifications (5), Événements juridiques (6)|
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of copending PCT application Ser. No. PCT/US00/14748, filed May 26, 2000, which PCT application designates the United States, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference; this application is so a Continuation in Part of application U.S. Ser. No. 09/322,119, filed May 27, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,127,901, the disclosure of which is also hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
This invention relates to the field of electromagnetic wave energy transmission, and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for coupling electromagnetic energy from a strip transmission line to a waveguide transmission line in a structure that is well suited to both a wide range of functionality and to very low cost production.
In the field of microwave and millimeter wave energy transmission, such as commercial automotive radar systems (e.g. DE/Delphi's 77 GHz Forward Looking Radar), a myriad of microwave or millimeter wave components are involved, including millimeter integrated circuits (MMICs), diodes, printed circuits, antennas, and possibly waveguide components such as voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs) and isolators. Most of the components utilized are typically mounted on planar microstrip transmission line circuits since this method is extremely low cost. However some components, such as antennas, may be more preferably compatible with waveguide transmission lines instead of microstrip transmission lines. Therefore, when microstrip transmission lines are used in conjunction with waveguide transmission lines, there is a need for an effective way to transfer transmitted wave energy between the microstrip transmission line and the waveguide transmission line without serious return loss and insertion loss degradation.
One method for designing microstrip to waveguide transitions is to use probes to couple energy to and from the waveguide. However, at very high frequencies (such as 77 GHz) probes are very tiny and difficult to handle in a high volume manufacturing environment. Manufacturing tolerance errors can cause serious return loss and insertion loss degradation.
For example, one prior art coupling technique is known as a probe launch. A circuit board (e.g., a DUROID™ board) is cut back so that a tab having a microstrip transmission line which runs to the end of the tab, is inserted into the waveguide. The typical circuit board ground plane is cut away below the microstrip transmission line protruding into the waveguide so that the insulator portion of the board supports the “stick out” tab portion of the microstrip transmission line as a probe. The cutaway circuit board is placed into a waveguide opening, thereby creating a probe launch into the waveguide. However, the difficulty with such an approach is the ability to manufacture and assemble the components in a high volume manufacturing environment. It is somewhat difficult to cut the circuit board to make the microstrip probe and then slip the cut board into the waveguide structure such that there is good contact between the ground of the circuit board and the waveguide wall. Also, it should be noted that the waveguide opening where the circuit board is inserted must be carefully controlled so that the probe does not short circuit against the waveguide wall. As such, those skilled in the art can appreciate that the whole manufacturing and assembly procedure involved with providing a mechanically and electrically stable microstrip probe end launch is not straightforward.
Another similar probe launch technique also involves a microstrip transmission line on a circuit board (e.g. a DUROID™ board), where at an end point along the microstrip transmission line there are a series of vias in a rectangular pattern around the end point and through the circuit board and connecting with the typical circuit board ground plane. The rectangular pattern of vias conduct all the way to the ground plane. A waveguide back short then connects with the vias at the ground plane and waveguide walls are formed perpendicular to the circuit board at the end point so that a microstrip to waveguide transition is formed. This approach allows such end launching to be formed in the middle of a board rather than at the end as described previously with the cut board and “stick out” tab probe. This approach also requires having a sizeable opening in the waveguide which can produce unwanted leakage radiation. While this latter approach may be somewhat simpler to accomplish than the former cut board approach, similar manufacturing control problems as previously described still exist.
There is, therefore, still a need for an efficient, cost effective method and apparatus for coupling microwave or millimeter wave frequency range energy from a microstrip transmission line to a waveguide transmission line. The present invention provides such a microstrip to waveguide transition whose simple assembly makes it ideal for high volume manufacturing.
Moreover, such coupling methods and apparatus are not limited to microwave and higher frequencies, but are valuable and applicable for all manner of strip transmission line coupling to waveguide transmission lines.
In accordance with the present invention a method and apparatus for coupling one or more strip transmission lines to a waveguide transmission line is provided. One or more strip transmission lines are separated from corresponding ground planes by a dielectric therebetween. Each transmission line may be terminated reactively, or may form a port having a substantially resistive impedance. The waveguide transmission line is positioned on the opposite side of the corresponding ground plane from the conductive strip of the strip transmission line, and an aperture is formed through both the waveguide wall and the corresponding ground plane of the strip transmission line. This aperture will disrupt the transmission field of the two transmission lines involved, causing energy to be coupled between them.
By employing n apertures coupling the one or more strip transmission lines to the waveguide, an impedance-coupled network may be formed having up to 2(n+1) ports.
A waveguide having at least one waveguide wall is provided. The waveguide may be a channel, having waveguide walls and a waveguide short circuit wall located along the channel, but may take other forms (e.g. rectangular or round). For channel waveguides, the waveguide walls may have a narrow dimension, and may be coupled directly to the ground plane, which then provides a broader dimension top waveguide wall for the channel waveguide transmission line.
An aperture is located (typically transverse to the microstrip transmission line) and forms an aperture ground plane opening in the ground plane. The aperture is located proximate to the strip transmission line, and may typically be within one-half wavelength (of an operating frequency center) of a reactively terminated end, such as an open circuit end, which provides a strip transmission line circuit stub. The aperture may also be located proximate to a waveguide reactive termination, which provides a waveguide transmission line circuit stub. In a preferred embodiment a microstrip transmission line substrate is bonded to a conductive block using a conductive adhesive. The conductive block has a channel which forms three of the four waveguide transmission line walls. The ground plane of the microstrip substrate forms the upper waveguide transmission line wall. Transmitted wave energy is coupled between the microstrip transmission line and the waveguide transmission through the aperture etched in the microstrip ground plane of the substrate. The aperture is located less than a quarter-wavelength at the operating center frequency from the microstrip transmission line open circuit end and less than a quarter-wavelength at the operating center frequency from the waveguide short circuit wall.
FIG. 1 shows a perspective schematic view of an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2A is a top plan view of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1.
FIG. 2B is a side plan view of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1.
FIG. 2C is a front plan view of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 shows schematic top plan view of various key dimensions of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4A is a graph showing measurements of Return Loss in dB vs. Frequency in GHz taken for a preferred embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 4B is a graph showing measurements of Insertion Loss in dB vs. Frequency in GHz taken for a preferred embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 5 shows a front plan view of any alternative embodiment.
FIG. 6A is an end view of two strip transmission lines coupled to a resonant cavity.
FIG. 6B is a side view of the subject of FIG. 6A, with four ports visible.
FIG. 7A is an end view of two strip transmission lines coupled to a waveguide.
FIG. 7B is a side view of FIG. 7A, with six ports of a network visible.
FIG. 8A is an end view of a strip transmission line coupled to a circular waveguide.
FIG. 8B is a side view of the subject of FIG. 8A.
Various embodiments of the invention are depicted in the drawings discussed below. Reference numbers are used to depict designated elements shown in the drawings. The same part of an embodiment appearing in more than one drawing is always designated by the same reference number. Also, the same reference number is never used to designate different parts.
Referring to FIG. 1, microwave or millimeter wave energy (power) 10 flows along microstrip transmission line 12 and is desired to be coupled to and flow in waveguide 22, which, for illustration purposes, has a depicted rectangular cross-section 14, such as for a WR-10 waveguide. (It should be noted, however, that in FIG. 1, flow 10 in waveguide 22 is shown at a sectioned edge 15 merely for illustration clarity purposes. Those skilled in the art can appreciate that waveguide 22 does not come to an abrupt stop at edge 15 but typically can extend along direction 17 as desired or required by the waveguide transmission line circuit.) An aperture 16 is etched through the backside microstrip board ground plane 36 on the opposite side of the board with respect to microstrip transmission line 12 (e.g., through the ground plane of an Arlon ISOCLAD® 917 board, 0.005″ (125 μm) thick, ½ oz. (15 g) Cu). An open circuit stub 20 proximate to aperture 16 is formed by an abrupt end of the microstrip transmission line. Aperture fields are excited as the power comes along the microstrip transmission line and encounters the aperture. A waveguide short circuit stub 26 is formed in the waveguide proximate to the aperture opening in the microstrip ground plane 36. Power, depicted schematically as direction arrow 19, couples through aperture 16 and into waveguide 22, with the open circuit and short circuit stubs being situated to effectively electrically cancel each other out as described in more detail below. The waveguide has a taper from the aperture area to the full-height standard waveguide (e.g., WR-10). Taper 24 is provided to help compensate for impedance mismatches in the aperture area. For example, the microstrip impedance is in the order of 50-80 ohms or so, while the standard waveguide impedance in the area of hundreds of ohms. The gradual taper is used to go from the high waveguide impedance to the lower microstrip impedance. The type of taper is not critical, e.g., it can be a linear taper or, in a preferred embodiment, a curved taper, which minimizes the amount of curvature along the length of the taper. Of course, those skilled in the art can appreciate that the longer the taper, the better. However, the length of the taper is a tradeoff between the amount of space available for the taper and the amount of impedance mismatching which can occur. In the preferred embodiment, a 0.2″ (5 mm) long taper was chosen, with a gradual tapering from a full height narrow WR-10 wall of 0.050″ (1.25 mm) to a reduced height narrow wall at the waveguide short circuit stub of 0.010″ (254 μm). In the preferred embodiment, a tapered curve was chosen based upon minimizing the mean square value of the second derivative of the waveguide height as a function of distance along the waveguide.
FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C are provided to depict other views of the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 to further illustrate this embodiment of the invention. Specifically, FIG. 2A shows a top plan view of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1. FIG. 2B shows a side plan view of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1. FIG. 2C shows a front plan view of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1.
To provide a good impedance match, the length of the open circuit microstrip stub 20 and the length of the short circuit waveguide stub 26 become important. In the preferred embodiment, waveguide stub (back short) 26 is made smaller than a quarter wavelength at the center frequency in the device operating frequency range (e.g., at 80 GHz in the device operating frequency range of 75 GHz-85 GHz) and looks like an inductive reactance so that an inductance is provided at the junction. Open circuit microstrip stub 20 is similarly made smaller than a quarter wavelength at the center frequency in the device operating frequency range and looks capacitive. As such, the net inductance and capacitance of the stubs and other junction effects can be canceled out.
Width 28 of aperture 16 is not significant, other than it being narrow as compared to a wavelength. Length 30 of the slot is spaced equidistant about transmission line 12 and should be roughly half a wavelength at the center frequency in the device operating frequency range using the effective dielectric constant in the aperture which is typically the average of the dielectric material and air, since aperture slot 16 includes both air of the waveguide and dielectric of the board. Then, to effectively adjust the matching impedance, those skilled in the art can take into consideration the aperture slot reactance and dimensional characteristics and appropriately adjust the open circuit microstrip stub length and/or the waveguide back short length to maximize the return loss and minimize insertion loss.
Referring to FIG. 3, a schematic top plan view of various key dimensions of a working preferred embodiment of the present invention operating with WR-10 waveguide in a frequency range of 75-85 GHz is illustrated. Reference numerals consistent with aspects depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2A-2C are similarly numbered. Inner waveguide dimension 50 is 0.100″. Microstrip 12 is located on an Arlon ISOCLAD® 917, 0.005″ (125 μm) thick, ½ oz. (15 g) Cu board and has an initial strip width 52 of 0.0148″ (376 μm) and two transition steps 54 and 56 of 0.0105″ (267 μm) and 0.010″ (254 μm) respectively. Transition step 54 has a step length of 0.029″ (737 μm). Aperture width 28 is 0.005″ (125 μm) and is located such that waveguide back short 26 is 0.020″ (0.51 mm). Open circuit stub 20 has an end distance 60 from aperture 16 of 0.010″ (0.254 mm) and has its junction distance 62 to the step 54/step 56 transition of 0.007″ (0.178 mm).
Referring back to FIG. 1, to manufacture the transition, in a preferred embodiment, a block 32 is used to support microstrip circuit board 18. Block 32 can be aluminum machined or cast to have groove(s) or channel(s) in it, which form two of the narrow walls of the waveguide along with a broad wall of the waveguide connecting the two narrow walls. WR-10 is the size of the waveguide to be formed in the preferred embodiment.
Microstrip board 18 is etched such that on one side there are microstrip transmission lines, while on the other side there are aperture(s) 16 located in ground plane 36 in relationship with the microstrip transmission line being coupled. The etching process is standard wherein double-clad board is patterned on both sides such that the unwanted copper is etched away on both sides of the board.
A thin sheet of conductive adhesive 34, such as Ablestick (trademark) 5025E conductive epoxy, has appropriate openings cut into it. The adhesive is then laid onto the block area and the circuit board ground plane area is placed on top of the adhesive. Alignment pins may be used to align the adhesive and circuit board etchings with the grooves in the block. The alignment precision is kept on the order of +/−0.001″ (25 μm). A temporary top plate, such as a hard plastic can be then placed on the circuit board to apply pressure and flatten the adhesive and provide a good bond between the circuit board ground plane (which will form the top of the waveguide when assembly is complete) and the block. The assembled unit is then heated in an oven to melt the conductive adhesive to form a good bond between the circuit board and the metal block and therefore good current conductivity. The Ablestick openings help prevent the adhesive adding additional loss to the top surface of the waveguide. The temporary top plate can then be removed and an appropriate permanent cover affixed to protect the microstrip circuits and any components (e.g., planar surface mounted Gunn diode oscillators) which may be mounted thereon.
In another embodiment, referring to FIG. 5, foam 70 (made of appropriate dielectric material for the microstrip transmission purposes) can be used between aluminum top plate 72 wherein screws 74 fasten top plate 72 with block 32, adhesive 34, ground plane 36, etched circuit board 18, and foam 70 being sandwiched therebetween. In some applications, the use of foam is preferred in that it can be easily cut to accommodate chips and the like which are connected to the microstrip transmission line circuits.
Another advantage of the transition in accordance with the present invention is that the waveguide runs essentially in the same plane as the microstrip circuit, whereas in the prior art, typical transitions run such that the resulting transmission lines are perpendicular to each other. The present invention thus enables transmitted wave paths to be generally maintained in the same plane, particularly where there is not much vertical thickness space available.
Referring to FIG. 4A, there is shown a graph depicting measurements of Return Loss in dB vs. Frequency in GHz taken for two similar back to back (i.e., waveguide to microstrip to waveguide) transitions of a test device having the dimensions identified above with regard to FIG. 3. The line 410 shows the measured return loss over the indicated frequency. range.
Similarly, FIG. 4B is a graph showing measurements of Insertion Loss in dB vs. Frequency in GHz taken for the two back to back (i.e., waveguide to microstrip to waveguide) transitions for the test device having the dimensions identified above with regard to FIG. 3 and the Return Loss measurements of FIG. 4A. The dashed line 420 shows the measured insertion loss over the indicated frequency range.
FIGS. 6A (end view) and 6B (side view) show strip transmission lines formed of conductive strips 12, 82 disposed above a corresponding ground plane 36, 90 with dielectric 18 therebetween. This need not be microwave or millimeter wave transmission line, but may be any wavelength, as long as the materials and dimensions are selected to match the wavelength. Lateral walls 102 of resonant cavity 98 are shown with substantial material, but of course may be simply walls of minimal thickness. Top and bottom walls of resonant cavity 98 are shown as being formed by ground planes 36, 90 of the strip transmission lines. However, it is to be noted that satisfactory coupling for some purposes may be achieved when the strip transmission line ground plane is less tightly coupled to the resonant cavity (or other waveguide). For example, the ground plane of one or more of the strip transmission lines may be separated in one or more places by as much as one tenth of a wavelength (of a center of an operating frequency range) from the wall of the waveguide, in the vicinity of the apertures. However, tighter coupling between strip transmission ground plane 36, 90 and the waveguide (here, resonant cavity 98) is desirable, preferably at least ohmic contact, conductive adhesive bonding, or, as shown, utilizing the same metal.
Coupling is achieved by apertures 16, 86 which penetrate the coupled transmission line ground plane proximate to strip 12, 82 of the upper and lower strip transmission lines. The shape of the apertures 16, 86, shown as rectangular, may be made as desired. The shape will affect the impedance of the coupling between the waveguides. In these FIGS. 6A and 6B, the upper strip transmission line has port terminations 91 and 92, while the lower strip transmission line has port terminations 93 and 94. With coupling through the resonant cavity, a four port impedance-coupled network is effected.
Four port coupling may also be achieved, for example, with a waveguide coupled to a strip transmission line through a single aperture, if all four ends of the two transmission lines are port terminated, instead of being reactively terminated. Indeed, a six port network is shown in FIGS. 7A (end view) and 7B (side view). There, the top strip transmission line is port terminated at ports 91 and 92, while the bottom strip transmission line is port terminated at 93 and 94. Further, waveguide 100 itself is port terminated at ports 95 and 96. As can be seen, then, the present invention may be practiced to form impedance-coupled waveguides having an unlimited number of ports. Nor must the coupling between the strip transmission lines and the waveguide be limited to a single aperture 16 or 86 as shown, but a plurality of such apertures may create impedance couplings between even the same strip transmission line and waveguide.
The shape of apertures 16, 86, the coupling between the waveguide wall and the strip transmission line ground plane around the aperture, and the shape of the waveguide and of the strip transmission line may all be used to establish a desired impedance coupling between the transmission line and the waveguide. As discussed with respect to FIGS. 6A and 6B, the coupling may range from utilizing the same metal (as shown), to an ohmic contact such as a conductive adhesive, to even a separation of up to a tenth of a wavelength between the waveguide wall and the ground plane (as long as there is substantial conductivity at the operating frequency). However, a common use of the present invention will be to couple as much power as possible between the waveguide and the strip transmission line. To do so, one end of each transmission line is reactively terminated at some distance from an aperture, so that the impedance at the aperture is approximately zero. Thus, if an open circuit stub is used, then a quarter wavelength distance of termination to aperture is appropriate; while if a short circuit stub is used, then the stub should extend a half wavelength past the aperture. (Note, however, that the transmission lines may be terminated farther away, e.g. 1.25 wavelengths away, as long as the net reflected impedance is conducive to causing coupling through the aperture.) When transmission lines are coupled according to the present invention, the apertures are shaped and the transmission lines are terminated as described in detail with regard to FIGS. 1 to 3, coupling can be achieved having losses of less than one tenth of a dB. Thus, the present invention offers truly low-loss, as well as low-cost, transmission line coupling.
FIGS. 8A and 8B show an embodiment of the present invention employing a round waveguide. Of course, the waveguide may take other shapes as well. Dielectric 18 is wrapped around wall 104, which is the same as ground plane of the strip transmission line having conductive strip 12 separated from wall 104 by dielectric 18. As above, the strip transmission groundplane must be conductively connected to the waveguide around aperture 86, but it need not be identical, nor even ohmically in contact thereto. However, ohmic contact such as conductive adhesive bonding, or identity of material, is generally preferable for most purposes. Aperture 86, as shown in FIG. 8B, clearly shows the arbitrary shape of such an aperture, which may be varied as needed to achieve the desired impedance of the coupling.
Alternatives to the preferred embodiment will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, the aperture need not be perpendicular to the microstrip transmission line. However, in non-preferred embodiments not as much power will be coupled. The aperture could be offset from the conductor, providing the same general effect, but with a slightly different impedance transformation, which can be compensated for by the adjustments in the open circuit and back short stubs. However, maximum coupling is achieved when the microstrip transmission line is perpendicular to the aperture slot and the aperture slot is, in turn, perpendicular to the waveguide. Deviations from this configuration will reduce the amount of coupling and necessitate additional impedance matching.
Preferred embodiments and alternative embodiments are disclosed herein for illustration of the present invention, but are not to be used to limit the scope of the invention. Rather, the invention is defined by the claims which follow.
|Brevet cité||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US6127901 *||27 mai 1999||3 oct. 2000||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Method and apparatus for coupling a microstrip transmission line to a waveguide transmission line for microwave or millimeter-wave frequency range transmission|
|US6144266 *||12 févr. 1999||7 nov. 2000||Alcatel||Transition from a microstrip line to a waveguide and use of such transition|
|DE4241635A1||10 déc. 1992||16 juin 1994||Ant Nachrichtentech||Transition piece between microstrip waveguide to hollow waveguide - broadens from microstrip into unilateral suspended substrate guide to match and join hollow guide|
|DE4441073A||Titre non disponible|
|EP0599316A1||25 nov. 1993||1 juin 1994||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Waveguide-microstripline transformer|
|JPH07202520A||Titre non disponible|
|JPH08148913A||Titre non disponible|
|Brevet citant||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US6707348 *||14 août 2002||16 mars 2004||Xytrans, Inc.||Microstrip-to-waveguide power combiner for radio frequency power combining|
|US6967543||5 janv. 2004||22 nov. 2005||Xytrans, Inc.||Microstrip-to-waveguide power combiner for radio frequency power combining|
|US7161791 *||21 janv. 2005||9 janv. 2007||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Variable capacitance membrane actuator for wide band tuning of microstrip resonators and filters|
|US7170366||29 mars 2005||30 janv. 2007||Andrew Corporation||Waveguide to microstrip transition with a 90° bend probe for use in a circularly polarized feed|
|US7215064||27 janv. 2005||8 mai 2007||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Piezoelectric switch for tunable electronic components|
|US7343655||27 janv. 2005||18 mars 2008||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Manufacturing methods of micro electromechanical switch|
|US7400488||30 nov. 2006||15 juil. 2008||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Variable capacitance membrane actuator for wide band tuning of microstrip resonators and filters|
|US7656071||22 avr. 2003||2 févr. 2010||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Piezoelectric actuator for tunable electronic components|
|US7992271||9 août 2011||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Process of manufacturing a piezoelectric actuator for tunable electronic components on a carrier substrate|
|US7994879||30 oct. 2007||9 août 2011||Electronics And Telecommunication Research Institute||Apparatus for transitioning millimeter wave between dielectric waveguide and transmission line|
|US8169274||5 juil. 2007||1 mai 2012||Mitsubishi Electric Corporation||Transmission line converter using oblique coupling slots disposed in the narrow wall of a rectangular waveguide|
|US8305280||4 nov. 2009||6 nov. 2012||Raytheon Company||Low loss broadband planar transmission line to waveguide transition|
|US8552813||23 nov. 2011||8 oct. 2013||Raytheon Company||High frequency, high bandwidth, low loss microstrip to waveguide transition|
|US8995838 *||2 déc. 2010||31 mars 2015||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Waveguide assembly for a microwave receiver with electro-optic modulator|
|US9335568||2 juin 2011||10 mai 2016||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Electro-optic grating modulator|
|US20040075364 *||22 avr. 2003||22 avr. 2004||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Piezoelectric actuator for tunable electronic components|
|US20040140863 *||5 janv. 2004||22 juil. 2004||Xytrans, Inc.||Microstrip-to-waveguide power combiner for radio frequency power combining|
|US20050127792 *||27 janv. 2005||16 juin 2005||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Piezoelectric switch for tunable electronic components|
|US20050151444 *||27 janv. 2005||14 juil. 2005||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Piezoelectric switch for tunable electronic components|
|US20050155851 *||21 janv. 2005||21 juil. 2005||Hrl Laboratories, Llc.||Variable capacitance membrane actuator for wide band tuning of microstrip resonators and filters|
|US20060181365 *||29 mars 2005||17 août 2006||Andrew Corporation||Waveguide to microstrip transition|
|US20100064493 *||20 nov. 2009||18 mars 2010||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Piezoelectric actuator for tunable electronic components|
|US20100176894 *||5 juil. 2007||15 juil. 2010||Mitsubishi Electric Corporation||Transmission line converter|
|US20100253450 *||30 oct. 2007||7 oct. 2010||Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute||Apparatus for transitioning millimeter wave between dielectric waveguide and transmission line|
|US20110102284 *||5 mai 2011||Brown Kenneth W||Low Loss Broadband Planar Transmission Line To Waveguide Transition|
|Classification aux États-Unis||333/26, 333/34|
|29 août 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HRL LABORATORIES, LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LYNCH, JONATHAN J.;REEL/FRAME:011061/0397
Effective date: 20000828
|13 juil. 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|24 juin 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|29 août 2014||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|21 janv. 2015||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|10 mars 2015||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20150121