Freeman, Alan (2007): The modernity of backwardness.
Download (244kB) | Preview
This paper revisits one of the classic debates on world capitalist development – the ‘transition to capitalism’ debate framed in Robert Brenner’s classic critique of World Systems and Dependency Theory.
It was originally presented to the July 2007 conference of the International Confederation for Pluralism in Economics (ICAPE) and in a slightly modified form, to the September 2007 conference of the UK Political Studies Association. The paper argues that the 1970s discussion was founded on an deeply flawed understanding of the mechanisms by which modern capitalist production relations produce what is termed ‘backwardness’.
Economics has failed to develop an adequate explanation for the most persistent phenomenon of the modern world – the polarisation of the world’s national economies, grouped within two great and remarkably geographically stable blocs. The reason, I argue in this paper, is the general equilibrium paradigm which predicts that modern capitalist production, left to its own devices, must necessarily even out national differences in productivity, wages, and profits over time. However the reverse happens, and development theory is deprived of an adequate explanation for national differentiation in terms of the ordinary mechanisms of the capitalist market.
This loss is compounded by parallel failure within Marxist value theory. The paper locates the origin of this failure within the systematic replacement of this theory by an equilibrium re-interpretation of it, converting it into a variant of the very orthodoxy to which it was supposed to offer an alternative.
The paper assesses the skewed character which results, in contemporary accounts (both within and outside economics) of development, dependency, inequality and imperialism. These are driven to assign inappropriate weight to ‘political and ‘cultural’ mechanisms or to classify the economic circumstances of the poor nations as in some sense exceptional or abnormal for capitalism. The idea that underdevelopment – ‘backwardness’ – is a failure to catch up or an absence of modernity, has thus become the conceptual framework for discussing the national difference produced by modernity.
This is particularly clear in the evidently symbiotic and mutually conditioned development of slavery in the USA and the Industrial Revolution (with Cotton at its centre) in the UK. Antebellum slavery, once the economic mechanisms are clarified, can be understood not as a backward survival from a precapitalist era, but a product of modern capitalism itself.
This principle is a general one. ‘Backwardness’, I argue, is a disguised outcome of the most modern of all economic processes – the constant technical revolutions that characterise industrial capitalism.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The modernity of backwardness|
|Keywords:||Inequality; Development; Value Theory; Temporalism, World Systems Theory, Dependency Theory, Globalization, TSSI, General Equilibrium|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General > B00 - General
|Depositing User:||Alan Freeman|
|Date Deposited:||22. Jan 2008 16:20|
|Last Modified:||12. Mar 2015 00:20|
Amin, S. (1974), Accumulation on a World Scale. New York: Monthly Review Press. Amin, S. (1977), Imperialism and Unequal Development. Sussex: Harvester Press. Braudel, F (1979) Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme XV-XVIIIe siècle. Tome I: Les Structures du quotidien. Paris: Armind Collin Braudel, F (1979) Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme XV-XVIIIe siècle . Tome II: Les Jeux de l’échange. Paris: Armind Collin Braudel, F (1979) Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme XV-XVIIIe siècle . Tome III: Le Temps du MondeParis: Armand Collin Brenner (1974), ‘The Origins of Capitalist Development:a Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’ New Left Review Carchedi, G. (1991), Frontiers of Political Economy. London: Verso. Dobb, M (1946), Studies in the Development of Capitalism (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1946). Dobb, M (1950), 'Reply to Sweezy' Science and Society, XIV, 2, Spring 1950, 134-57, Dos Santos, Theontonio (1968), La Nueva Dependencia. (Buenos Aires: s/ediciones, 1968) Emmanuel, A. (1972), Unequal Exchange, New York: Publisher TBA Febvre, L. Freeman, A. (2004b), ‘The Inequality of Nations’ in Freeman, A, and Boris Kagarlitsky (eds) (2004) The Politics of Empire: Globalisation in crisis. London: Pluto Press. Freeman, A., Andrew Kliman and Julian Wells (eds) (2001), The New Value Controversy in Economics, pp55-67. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Freeman, A.. and Carchedi, G. (eds) (1996), Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics, pp1-29. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Gunder Frank, A. (1967), Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, New York: Monthly Review Press Gunder Frank, A. (1969), The Development of Underdevelopment, in Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution, New York and London. Gunder Frank, A. (1972), Lumpenbourgeoisie: Lumpendevelopment. Dependence, Class, and Politics in Latin America, New York: Publisher TBA Hilferding, R. (1981). Finance Capital, a Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Hobson, J (1938). Imperialism: a study. London: George Allen and Unwin Kliman, A. (1988), ‘The Profit Rate Under Continuous Technological Change’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 20:2 & 3. Kliman, A.(2007), Reclaiming Marx's “Capital”: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books), 2007 Laclau, E. (1971), 'Feudalism and Capitalism in Latin America', New Left Review, No. 67, May-June 1971, 37-8 Lenin, V. (1952). Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, in Lenin, V. (1952) Selected Works, vol I., Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House Mandel, E. (1978), Late Capitalism. London: Verso. Mandel, E. and Freeman, A. (1984) Marx, Ricardo and Sraffa. London: Verso Palloix, C. (1975), ‘The Self-Expansion of Capital on a World Scale’. Translated from L’internationalisation du capital. Paris: Maspero. Rostow, W (1960), The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960 Sweezy, P(1950), 'The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism', Science and Society, XIV, 2, Spring 1950, 134-57, Wahl, Jenny.(2001) "Slavery in the United States". EH.Net Encyclopedia, edited by Robert Whaples. August 15, 2001. URL http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/wahl.slavery.us; Wallerstein, E. (1974a), The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, New York: Academic Press. Volume I of a three-volume work of which volumes II and III appeared after Brenner’s article. Wallerstein, E. (1974b), ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XVI, pp. 387–415 Wallerstein, E.. (1974b), ‘From Feudalism to Capitalism: Transition or Transitions?’, Social Forces, LV , pp. 273–81 Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Unwin Wells, J.P. (2001). ‘What is the distribution of the rate of profit?’. Paper presented to the 2001 mini-conference of the IWGVT at the Eastern Economic Association.