Congrats to Lavar for standing up to the predators, not backing down and getting another bogus ticket dropped. Lavar initially had a lawyer who said he could not represent him because of the contents of the motion to dismiss I provided him. I’m guessing this lawyer thought it was a blasphemy to question the applicability of sacred writ, the “law”. Funny enough, the lawyer refunded the money Lavar had given him.
So Lavar filed the motion on his own and mailed a copy to the cop. In Lavar’s words:
“then came trial day and to my disadvantage the officer showed up today 5/5/14 then he dismissed the ticket without a second thought or look. Then walks out [of] the court room like nothing happened.”
Looks like the cop got the motion and decided to speak to the judge, that he wanted it dismissed. As you can see below, a judge did and the ticket was dismissed.
While we have to speculate exactly why the cop moved for dismissal, the circumstantial evidence is pretty strong it was because of the issues raised in the motion. To claim it has nothing to do with the motion ignores the available evidence, and is more indicative of a personal bias than what happened. The issues in the motion are the cop failed to provide any evidence proving the constitution and laws of the “state” applied, there was no valid cause of action and there was no jurisdiction.
Why show up at court at all, not showing up would have had the same end result. Why show up at all and ask for a dismissal? If the cop thought the ticket was garbage and “legalistic gibberish” without any merit, then why not spend the time helping the judge hand Lavar his butt and hit him with a nice fine? Also, the judge could have rejected his motion to dismiss and ordered him to participate in the trial. The judge had the motion, if the judge thought (as the critics of my work) the motion had no merit, then they could have denied it without explanation and put on one of their mock trials and extract some money.
They didn’t and it stands to reason, though I can’t prove this, that the cop and judge saw the obvious merit and decided to just let it go without a fight. They certainly didn’t provide any evidence of jurisdiction, that we can prove. If there was evidence proving the constitution and laws of the “state” applied to Lavar because he was physically in Florida, then they would have presented it, found him guilty and fined him.
Congrats to Lavar for standing up to the predators and providing me with the documentary proof the ticket was dismissed. And extra kudos for still doing it after the attorney bailed on him.
And for the critics: if you know of facts proving the constitution and laws of a “state” apply to us just because we are physically in Florida (or where ever), then feel free to call into the No State Project and present it.