No explanatory value for creationism? Well it explains why evolution fares so poorly...
[10/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
I am beginning to suspect this guy isn't the real Charles Darwin...
11/23/2006 6:15:58 PM
I don't think this dude is THE Charles Darwin.
He didn't have an internet account.
4/3/2012 6:40:05 AM
No, it doesn't even do that.
4/3/2012 7:02:55 AM
Is that English?
4/3/2012 7:05:15 AM
"No explanatory value for creationism? Well it explains why evolution fares so poorly..."
...then just two years later.
Your argument is invalid, Chuck.
And not just in terms of validity, neither; cop for this (when you click on the quote link):
'IIDB is ancient history.
1. It ceased to exist on January 1st 2009.
2. This page is all that remains.
3. The domain will never be sold or released.'
No explanatory value for your post?
Well, it explains why it - and the credibility of Creationism, post-Kitzmiller vs. Dover - no longer
[/Irony] [/Hubris] [/
4/3/2012 8:39:46 AM
Tsk, I guess he probably assumed he was being rather clever, oh well...
4/3/2012 8:58:08 AM