VTechWorks is expected to experience some downtime tomorrow, Friday, 5/27, sometime between 8am and 10am, as ITS migrates it to new virtual machines. Please plan accordingly -- sorry for the inconvenience. As always, write firstname.lastname@example.org with questions or concerns.
What Makes a Successful College or University Programming Board?: Standards of Practice for Programming Boards
Page, Megan Alene
MetadataShow full item record
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY PROGRAMMING BOARD?: STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMMING BOARDS by Megan Alene Page Dr. Joan B. Hirt, Chair Educational Leadership and Policy Studies ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to seek an understanding of the characteristics of successful college and university programming boards (CUPBs). Specifically, I explored the organization and management; human, financial, and facility resource; campus and community relationship; program; mission; assessment and self-evaluation; and leadership characteristics of CUPBs. For purposes of this study, successful programming boards were defined and identified by professionals who work in this area of student affairs administration. To obtain the sample for this study, student affairs professionals who work with college and university programming boards and are members of the National Association of Campus Activities (NACA) were contacted. Members were asked to identify successful programming boards in their NACA region. Based on the programming boards identified through this process, the most successful programming boards for each of the seven NACA regions were identified. There were 22 total programming boards included in the study's sample. An Institutional Profile (IP) form was created with items that related to the research questions posed in this study. Document analysis was conducted on texts and reports obtained from advisors of the sample's programming boards. Additional information was obtained through interviews with these advisors. Responses that were qualitative in nature were analyzed and assigned to response categories. The data that were quantitative in nature were analyzed by calculating frequency and/or range and mean scores. The data revealed significant results for each of the seven characteristics explored in the study. The findings suggest ways to structure and staff CUPBs, how to select and train student leaders, how to manage human and financial resources, how to manage facilities, and the types and numbers of programs successful CUPBs sponsor. Recommendations about the mission of successful CUPBs were identified, as were ways to assess outcomes and advise the programming board. Collectively, the results describe the elements of successful CUPBs. These elements can be used to establish standards of practice for such boards and the staff who manage them.
- Masters Theses