Hey, long time no see. How are you? Learned anything new recently?
The latter is a bit wide-ranging to be useful for learning a particular subject (history), but the former seems like a good start at an accessible course in learning maths. It’s brief — only 15 posts — but accessibly written.
But Chimero looks for the common factors in both and comes up with a list that he thinks makes them both work:
- Familiar subject matter. Probably addressed at some point in varying depths during schooling.
- Automated delivery, through RSS or Podcast (which is still RSS, but still).
- Medium-format. A lengthy blog post or a 10-minute piece of audio.
- Lush and illustrative. Strogatz [in Elements of Math] uses atypical examples and lots of imagery and some videos in his posts. A History has interviews and great storytelling, and sometimes feels almost like a Radiolab for the humanities. Oh, and that whole interactive website thingie where you get to mill about the precious artifacts.
- The content does not exist inside a vacuum. References to the outside world are welcome and encouraged.
- There is a specific tone to these. They feel like a kind introduction to these topics starting at square-one, but do not make the presumption you’re an idiot. Almost like a “…for Dummies” book that doesn’t think you’re a dummy.
- The presumption is the listener or reader is absorbing these mostly out of curiosity and thus self-educating themselves in the process. So it’s educational, but there’s no homework.
- Curated. This is the big one. The scope is limited, and the content presented in a logical order through a narrative. There is a beginning, a middle, and an end. And through it all, you are guided by a story which gives a desirable linearity to the whole thing.
Chimero sees these as a new delivery format for curated educational materials — he calls them SurveyCasts — suited for periodic consumption via the internet. So that’s worth thinking about.