|Publication number||US5431825 A|
|Application number||US 07/968,369|
|Publication date||Jul 11, 1995|
|Filing date||Oct 29, 1992|
|Priority date||Oct 29, 1992|
|Publication number||07968369, 968369, US 5431825 A, US 5431825A, US-A-5431825, US5431825 A, US5431825A|
|Inventors||Bruce N. Diel|
|Original Assignee||Chemical Waste Management, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (28), Non-Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (31), Classifications (22), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
(1) Field of the Invention
This invention concerns a method for the chemical reduction and stabilization of reducible metals that comprises mixing a reducible metal with one or more elemental metals and a chemical reducing agent to effect the reduction of the reducible metals. A stabilizing agent is then added to the solution to stabilize and in some cases precipitate the reduced metals. The resulting stabilized reduced metals exhibit a very low leaching rates.
(2) Description of the Art
Many methods are known in the prior art for reducing reducible metals. One well known method involves the reduction of reducible metals with a solid metal. This method is inefficient however, requiring the use of metal fines and a well mixed solution. Another metal reducing method involves the combination of a reducible metal with a reducing agent such as iron sulfate powder. The reduction can be accomplished in the solid or liquid phas This method, however, requires a large excess of reducing agent in order to sustain the reducing reaction.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,194,973 discloses a method for decolorizing a solution containing dyes, and specifically chromophoric compounds such as aryl azo- or aryl nito- containing dyes. The method includes combining the dye solution with a source of Fe(II) and iron at metal reduction conditions. The chromophoric compounds disclosed contain Cr(III or VI). Furthermore, the reduced metals are precipitated from the solution and recovered and the resulting decolorized solution is disposed of. The patent discloses that the reducing agent attacks the dye portion of the compound.
A paper, titled "Iron Conditioning of Sludge from Foundary Furnace Emission Control Systems for Elimination of EP Toxicity", W. A. Stephens, et al., Proceedings of the 39th Industrial Waste Conference; Madison, Wis. (1985) pp. 511-14 discloses a study performed by the EPA in which ferric sulfate or iron filings were separately combined with leachable lead and cadmium containing wastes to reduce lead and cadmium leaching rates.
An article by P. D. Turpin, et al.; Trans. Amer. Foundrymen's Soc.; 93: 737-40 (1983) describes methods for decreasing lead and cadmium leaching rates of foundry solid waste. The methods include, in the alternative, treating the leachable solid wastes with ferric hydroxide, metallic iron, phosphate, magnesium hydroxide, or lime. The article discusses various methods used to reduce waste leaching rates including absorption, precipitation, chemical reduction, and pH solubility control. The chemical reduction method disclosed is performed using iron filings.
An article by D. C. Nagle, et al., Trans. Amer. Foundrymen's Soc.; 91: 715-20 (1983) discloses a number of methods for treating hazardous wastes generated by foundries. The methods include chemical treatment using sodium phosphate and controlling waste pH to keep the waste metals from solubilizing. The article generally discusses solidification and encapsulation of hazardous wastes in cement.
An article by L. E. Eary, et al.; Environ. Sci. Technol; 22:972-77 (1988) discloses the optimum conditions for chromate removal from oxygenated wastes. The method describes reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) using ferrous sulfate. Another article by Eary, et al.; Am. J. Sci.; 289: 180-213 (1989) discloses that Cr(VI) can be reduced to Cr(III) by combining a chromate solution with ferrous iron.
It is an object of this invention to provide a method for reducing a reducible metal that exploits the synergism that results from reducing a reducible metal in the presence of both an elemental metal and a reducing agent.
It is another object of this invention to provide a method for reducing a reducible metal that requires only a small amount of a reducing agent.
It is yet another object of this invention to provide a method for reducing a reducible metal that produces a stabilized reduced metal while using a only small amount of stabilizer.
In one embodiment, this invention is a method for stabilizing one or more reducible metals. The method comprises mixing one or more reducible metals with an elemental metal and with a reducing agent to define a reducing mixture. The reducing mixture is allowed to react for a period of time sufficient to reduce at least a portion of the reducible metals to give a reduced mixture that includes one or more reduced metals. Finally, the reduced mixture is recovered and disposed of.
In another embodiment, this invention is a method for stabilizing reducible metals comprising mixing one or more reducible metals with an elemental metal and then with a reducing agent in an aqueous solution to define a reducing solution. The reducing solution is allowed to react for a period of time sufficient to define a reduced solution including one or more reduced metals. The reduced metals are stabilized in a solid by adding a stabilizing agent to the reduced metal solution. The stabilizing agent is allowed to solidify and the solid stabilized reduced metal is recovered for disposal.
Chemical treatment to reduce solubility of metals and render a waste non-leachable and therefore non-hazardous is a feasible alternative for handling reducible metal wastes on the basis of regulatory, economic, and technical considerations. This invention recognizes for the first time that a synergism occurs when reducible metals are reduced in the presence of both a metal and a chemical reducing agent.
The treatment of hazardous waste in solid, liquid, or sludge form containing leachable metals such as chromium, cadmium, lead, and thallium is becoming quite important. The EPA has established allowable metal leaching rates and hazardous leachable wastes stabilized in cement or otherwise stabilized must pass EPA regulated leaching tests prior to disposal.
The present invention relates to the use of metal powders, grits, fines, etc. in combination with soluble metal ions for the purpose of effecting the chemical reduction of easily reduced metals such as Cr(VI) to Cr(III), Pb(II) to Pb(0), As V, III) to As(O), Se (VI, IV, II) to Se(0), Hg(II) to Hg(0), Bi(III) to Bi(0), Sb(V, III) to Sb(0), V(V, IV, III, II) to V(0), and Tl(III, I) to TI(0). The method of this invention is surprisingly more efficient and cost effective than conventional reduction methods that use metallic ion reactants or metal based ionic reducing agents alone.
The process of this invention entails the reduction of a reducible metal by creating a reducing mixture comprising elemental metal, a reducing agent, and one or more reducible metals. The reducing mixture may be in the form of a solid, a liquid, or in the form of a sludge or slurry. It is preferred that the reducing mixture contains water. Therefore, a reducing mixture that is in the form of a solution, a sludge or a slurry is preferred because the reduction reaction occurs quickly and efficiently in an aqueous environment.
The reducible metal reduced by the method of this invention may be selected from any metal ion that is capable of being reduced. Such reducible metals may be supplied to a reducible mixture in pure form or in an admixture with other reducible or non-reducible metals. Generally, the reducible metals reduced by the process of this invention are found in hazardous wastes such as foundry waste, baghouses dust, sludge, incinerator ash, and any other reducible metal containing hazardous waste. The reducible metal of this invention may be selected from a group of reducible metals of iron, chromium, cadmium, lead, thallium, arsenic, selenium, mercury, vanadium, antimony, bismuth, copper, silver and mixtures thereof.
The method of this invention uses a reducing agent. The reducing agent of this invention can be any soluble agent that will lend electrons to a reducible metals. Examples of useful reducing agents include soluble, e.g., chloride, nitrate, sulfate, and acetate salts of Fe(II), (e.g., FeSO4.NH2 O), Mo(II), Ru(II), Cr(II), Mn(II) and V(II).
It is preferred that the reducing agent used in the method of this invention contains ferrous ions and most preferably is ferrous sulfate. Ferrous sulfate generates Fe(II) which acts as a reducing substance. In addition, it has been found that ferrous ions in combination with manganese metal exhibits reducing abilities superior to other metal/reducing agent combinations.
The amount of reducing agent required by the method of this invention will vary depending upon the type of reducible metal that is reduced by the method of this invention. Preferably, an amount of reducing agent in excess of the stoichiometric amount needed to reduce the reducible metal is used.
The method of this invention also requires a metal, a metallic element in non-ionic form. The metal may take on various forms including granules, a powder, or even pieces of metal waste. The maximization of the metal surface area is an important aspect of this invention. Therefore, it is preferred that the metal used is finely divided, that is, in the form of small granules or a powder.
The metal used must be capable of contributing electrons to the reducible metal. Examples of useful metals include iron, tin, chromium, cadmium, lead, arsenic, selenium, thallium, mercury, vanadium, antimony, bismuth, copper, silver, mixtures thereof, and any other metal whose reduction potential is less than iron.
The reduction step of the method of this invention typically occurs at a pH of from about 1 to 12 and preferably from about 3 to 7. The reducing mixture will typically be controlled at a temperature ranging from about 20°-60° C. Under these conditions, the reducing mixture will be converted into a reduced mixture after about 20 minutes to about 10 hours or more.
An important aspect of this invention is the order of addition of the reducing agent and the metal to the reducing solution. It has been discovered that the method of this invention operates more efficiently when the metal is combined with the reducible metal prior to the addition of the reducing agent.
The method of this invention produces a solid or liquid reduced mixture. The reduced mixture may be disposed of by conventional disposal methods including stabilization, land filling, incineration or by any other method known in the art for disposing of such a reduced mixture.
It is preferred that the reduced mixture is stabilized and then land filled. The stabilization of the reduced mixture with a stabilizing agent is an important aspect of this invention. An alkaline stabilizing agent is preferred if the reduced metals are in ionic form. The alkaline nature of the stabilizing agent causes the reduced metals in oxidation states greater than zero to form hydroxide precipitates which exhibit low or no leaching tendencies. If the reduced metals have a zero valence then they will typically plate the metal component of the reduced mixture. The metal is then stabilized to trap the reduced metals. Therefore, the stabilization step of this invention may perform two functions. The stabilizer, if alkaline, may increase the pH of the reduced mixture to above about pH 8 causing precipitatable reduced metals to precipitate from the reduced mixture. Secondly, the alkaline stabilizer will always harden and entomb the reduced mixture allowing it to be disposed of in a conventional land fill.
Examples of stabilizes include cement, especially an alkaline cement such as Portland cement, cement kiln dust, bed ash, rice hull ash, quicklime, lime/fly ash, or any combination thereof. The preferred stabilizing agent is cement. According to this method the stabilizing agent is added to the aqueous reduced mixture, mixed, and allowed to harden into a solid monolithic or granular solid. The solid is then disposed of in a conventional landfill.
The stabilized solid of this invention including a reduced metal will typically exhibit metal leaching rates well below the threshold levels set by the EPA. The EPA leaching thresholds are determined by the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) established by the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA TCLP is found in the Federal Register 55(61), 11798 (Mar. 29, 1990).
The invention may be better understood by referring to the following examples.
The following examples are offered to illustrate the method of the invention. The effectiveness of each test was determined using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), as promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and described in the Federal Register 55 (61), 11798 (Mar. 29, 1990). The steel fines referred to in the Examples have a particle size distribution as indicated in Table I below. The ferrous sulfate used (FeSO4.7H2 O) are commercially available, technical grade, reagents. Manganese (powder, -325 mesh), and MnSO4.H2 O (98+%) are commercially available reagents.
TABLE 1______________________________________Sieve Size (mm) Mass Fraction______________________________________0.500-0.106 0.6090.106-0.032 0.3830.032-0.025 0.007______________________________________
The waste treated in this example was a composite of five different samples (100 g each) of hazardous waste incinerator ash. The composite was ball-milled overnight to yield a homogeneous solid of particle size <0.5 mm. The total constituent concentrations in the waste (CCW) were determined and are tabulated below.
______________________________________Constituent Concentration in the Waste (mg/kg)Ag As Ba Cd Cr Hg Pb Se______________________________________30.7 21.4 780 43.2 178.5 8.77 1520 0.36______________________________________
Portions of the waste, 50.0 g each, were slurried first with H2 O (12.5 ml) and then combined with agent(s) and mixed well until the mixture was visibly homogeneous. The mixture was then solidified by addition of 12.5 g of normal Portland cement (ASTM Type 1). The solidified product was sampled for analysis by TCLP to quantify leachable chromium. The results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2______________________________________Cr-Leaching Results; Incinerator Ash (EPA TreatmentStandard = 0.073 ppm) Mix Ratio (M.R.)*SAMPLE # Steel Fines FeSO4 Fe/FeSO4 (1:1) [Cr] (ppm)______________________________________Raw Waste 0 0 0 0.441 0.1 0 0 0.242 0 0.1 0 0.13 0 0 0.05 <0.02______________________________________ *M.R. = [Wt. of Reagent/Wt. of Waste
The synergist effect is evidenced by comparison of Sample 3 (2.5% by weight, of both steel fines and FeSO4.7H2 O) with Samples 1, 2 where the reducing agents are added singly. The synergistic mixture exhibited a leaching rate five times lower than using FeSO4 alone and over ten times lower than when iron was used alone.
A drummed solid process waste resulting from battery manufacturing, and containing Cr as chromate salts and ignitable lithium (Li) metal was treated in this example to (1) remove the hazard of reactivity (ignitability), and (2) reduce leachable chromium (as per EPA TCLP, treatment standard=5.0 ppm).
The solid waste (200.0 g) was hydrolyzed carefully with 50.0 ml H2 O under an inert N2 atmosphere. Upon completion of hydrolysis, all subsequent operations were conducted in air with no other special precautions. Various amounts (see Table 3) of steel fines were added the hydrolysis product slurry and mixed well until visibly homogeneous. Ferrous sulfate was then added, mixed well, and the entire mixture allowed to sit for approximately 30 minutes. Finally, the mixture was solidified with Portland cement (40%, w/w). The solidified product was analyzed by TCLP for quantitaion of leachable chromium. The results of the experiments are shown in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3______________________________________Cr-Leaching Results; Chromate Waste (EPA TreatmentStandard - 5.0 ppm)Mix Ratio (M.R.)SAMPLE # Fe FeSO4 [Cr] (ppm)______________________________________Raw Waste 0 0 11,7001 0.36 0 16502 0 5.3 3483 0.5 0.4 <0.014 0.2 0.1 0.42______________________________________
For this particular sample it was found that the order of addition of the reducing agents was critical. Steel fines are preferably added prior to the ferrous sulfate. Addition of the ferrous sulfate before the steel fines, in Example 4 yielded a product which exhibited a Cr-leaching rate much higher than Sample 3 where steel fines were added before the ferrous sulfate.
To determine the efficacy of various metals and/or metal salts in the process, a second sample of the waste described in Example 2 was treated. In this sample, however, there was no lithium metal. The waste was first slurried with water (30%, w/w), with the metal, and then with the soluble metal salt reducing agent. After sitting for approximately 30 minutes the mixture was solidified with Portland cement (40%, w/w). The solidified product was sampled for analysis by TCLP and quantitation of leachable chromium. Exemplary results are shown in Table 4 below.
TABLE 4______________________________________Mix RatioSample No. Steel Fines Mn FeSO4 MnSO4 [Cr] (ppm)______________________________________1 0.2 -- 0.5 -- 0.942 -- 0.2 0.5 -- 0.063 -- 0.2 -- 0.5 48.1______________________________________
These results illustrate the superior reducing power of the soluble ferrous ion, Fe(II), in combination with manganese metal.
This example illustrates the ability of the process of this invention to stabilize lead (Pb). The waste sample consisted of ashes/refuse resulting from a warehouse fire in which commercial lead stearate was combusted. The waste was slurried first with water. Steel fines were then added and mixed thoroughly followed by the addition and mixing of ferrous sulfate. The mixture was allowed to sit for approximately 30 minutes, followed by solidification with Portland cement. The solidified product was sampled for analysis by TCLP and quantitaion of leachable lead. The results are shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5______________________________________Pb-Leaching Results; Pb-Contaminated Ash (TreatmentStandard = 5.0 ppm)Waste H2 O Steel FeSO4.7H2 O Cement(g) (g) Fines (g) (g) (g) [Pb] (ppm)______________________________________Raw -- -- -- -- 730Waste200 35 40 100 60 1.30200 35 80 100 60 1.06200 35 80 50 60 0.79200 35 40 50 60 0.83______________________________________
All of the samples treated by the method of this invention exceeded the TCLP standard.
A second example of Pb-treatment involves stabilization of a highly contaminated (51,000 ppm total Pb, 571 ppm leachable by TCLP) lagoon sludge. To the wet sludge (40% solids) were added steel fines, followed by ferrous sulfate. The mixture was allowed to sit for approximately 30 minutes after which it was solidified by the addition of rice hull ash, quicklime (CaO), Portland cement, or bed ash. The solidified product was sampled for analysis by TCLP and quantitation of leachable lead. Exemplary results are shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6______________________________________Pb-Leaching Results; Lagoon Sludge (TreatmentStandard = 5.00 ppm)MIX RATIO TCLPSteel FeSO4. Rice Hull Quick- Portland Bed PbFines 7H2 O Ash lime cement Ash (ppm)______________________________________0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 -- -- 0.240.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 -- -- 0.270.4 0.2 0.2 -- 0.1 -- 0.300.3 0.2 0.2 -- 0.1 -- 0.360.25 0.2 0.2 0.1 -- -- 0.320.40 0.2 -- -- -- 0.9 2.100.40 -- -- -- 1.0 17.430.80 -- -- -- 1.0 4.83______________________________________
Here again, the final three entries in Table 6 illustrate the lack of synergism as evidenced by performance in the TCLP test when both the steel fines and FeSO4 are employed versus steel fines alone.
This example of Pb-stabilization involves the treatment of a highly contaminated (255,000 ppm total Pb, 3220 leachable by TCLP) baghouse dust. The waste was slurried first with water, the steel fines added and dispersed well, followed by addition of the ferrous sulfate. The mixture was allowed to sit for approximately 30 minutes after which it was solidified by addition of Portland cement. The solidified product was sampled for analysis by TCLP and quantitation of leachable lead. Exemplary results are shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7______________________________________Pb-Leaching; Baghouse Dust (Treatment Standard = 5.00 ppm)WASTE FeSO4.H2 O Cement H2 O(g) Fe (g) (g) (g) (mL) [Pb] (ppm)______________________________________100.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 3.26100.0 40.0 -- 20.0 25.0 39.40100.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 30.0 2.70100.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 4.64100.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 30.0 0.53100.0 100.0 50.0 50.0 70.0 0.65______________________________________
Entry 2 in Table 7 again illustrates the lack of synergism as evidenced by the unacceptable lead leaching rate.
The description above has been offered for illustrative purposes only, and it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention of this application which is defined in the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3027321 *||Nov 9, 1959||Mar 27, 1962||Wilson & Company||Treatment of chromate solutions|
|US3666447 *||Mar 25, 1970||May 30, 1972||Enthone||Removal and recovery of copper from substantially cyanide-free alkaline waste solutions|
|US3841102 *||Jan 2, 1974||Oct 15, 1974||Environmental Sciences Inc||Method of improving the quality of leachate from sanitary landfills|
|US3857704 *||Mar 3, 1972||Dec 31, 1974||Bp Chem Int Ltd||Mercury recovery process|
|US3960723 *||Dec 26, 1972||Jun 1, 1976||Ford Motor Company||Magnetization of iron chromium system|
|US3984312 *||Oct 31, 1973||Oct 5, 1976||Industrial Resources, Inc.||Process for insolubilizing potentially water pollutable wastes from sodium or ammonium type sulfur dioxide air pollution control systems|
|US4026797 *||Apr 19, 1976||May 31, 1977||Amax Inc.||Precipitation of selenium from copper electrowinning solutions|
|US4108770 *||Oct 18, 1976||Aug 22, 1978||Roy Clarence H||Chromium reduction process|
|US4159309 *||Mar 24, 1978||Jun 26, 1979||Kernforschungsanlage Julich Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung||Process for the catalytic reduction of reducible compounds in solution|
|US4169053 *||Jan 3, 1978||Sep 25, 1979||Nippon Electric Co., Ltd.||Method of treating waste waters containing solid-phase difficultly-soluble compounds|
|US4194973 *||Aug 28, 1978||Mar 25, 1980||American Color & Chemical Corporation||Method of lowering the color of effluent which contains aryl azo- or aryl nitro-containing compounds|
|US4260491 *||Nov 15, 1978||Apr 7, 1981||Amchem Products, Inc.||Chrome removal waste treatment process|
|US4379082 *||Apr 29, 1980||Apr 5, 1983||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Method of removing ruthenium contamination from a liquid radioactive effluent|
|US4405464 *||Aug 31, 1981||Sep 20, 1983||Kerr-Mcgee Nuclear Corporation||Process for the removal of selenium from aqueous systems|
|US4599177 *||Apr 4, 1984||Jul 8, 1986||Seitetsu Kagaku Co., Ltd.||Process for removal of mercury from waste water|
|US4740244 *||Oct 31, 1986||Apr 26, 1988||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process for recovery of silver from spent, waste, acidic processing fluids|
|US4881973 *||Feb 1, 1988||Nov 21, 1989||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Life silver recovery system|
|US5089141 *||Nov 9, 1990||Feb 18, 1992||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior||Chemical process for removing selenium from water|
|US5106508 *||Sep 26, 1990||Apr 21, 1992||Klaus Schwitzgebel||Integrated process for cyanide and heavy metal removal from plating process waste streams|
|US5106510 *||Mar 8, 1991||Apr 21, 1992||Enviroguard, Inc.||Combined filtration and fixation of heavy metals|
|US5122279 *||Apr 8, 1991||Jun 16, 1992||Romar Technologies Inc.||Ferrous dithionite process and compositions for removing dissolved heavy metals from water|
|US5130051 *||Jan 7, 1991||Jul 14, 1992||Safe-Waste Systems, Inc.||Composition to encapsulate chromium, arsenic and other toxic metals in wastes|
|US5133873 *||Feb 22, 1991||Jul 28, 1992||Miles Inc.||Process for removal of copper ions from aqueous effluent|
|US5200087 *||Dec 9, 1991||Apr 6, 1993||Kubota Corporation||Method of and apparatus for recovering mercury from drainage|
|US5211853 *||Jul 31, 1992||May 18, 1993||Huron Tech Corp.||Method for the removal of chromium compounds from aqueous solutions|
|US5285000 *||Nov 12, 1992||Feb 8, 1994||Klaus Schwitzgebel||Composition and process for organic and metal contaminant fixation in soil|
|US5330658 *||Mar 17, 1993||Jul 19, 1994||Westinghouse Electric Corporation||Solution decontamination method using precipitation and flocculation techniques|
|JPS5085570A *||Title not available|
|1||L. E. Eary & D. Rai, "Chromate Removal from Aqueous Wastes by Reduction with Ferrous Ion", Environ. Sci., Technol., 1988, vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 972-977.|
|2||L. E. Eary & D. Rai, "Kinetics of Chromate Reduction by Ferrous Ions Derived from Hematite and Biotite at 25° C.", American Journal of Science, vol. 289, Feb. 1989, pp. 180-213.|
|3||*||L. E. Eary & D. Rai, Chromate Removal from Aqueous Wastes by Reduction with Ferrous Ion , Environ. Sci., Technol., 1988, vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 972 977.|
|4||*||L. E. Eary & D. Rai, Kinetics of Chromate Reduction by Ferrous Ions Derived from Hematite and Biotite at 25 C. , American Journal of Science, vol. 289, Feb. 1989, pp. 180 213.|
|5||Nagle, Stanforth, et al., "Treatment of Hazardous Foundry Melting Furnace Dust & Sludges", AFS Transactions, pp. 715-720.|
|6||*||Nagle, Stanforth, et al., Treatment of Hazardous Foundry Melting Furnace Dust & Sludges , AFS Transactions, pp. 715 720.|
|7||Stephens, Stolzenburg, et al., "Iron Conditioning of Sludge From Foundry Furnace Emission Control Systems for Elimination of EP Toxicity", pp. 511-514.|
|8||*||Stephens, Stolzenburg, et al., Iron Conditioning of Sludge From Foundry Furnace Emission Control Systems for Elimination of EP Toxicity , pp. 511 514.|
|9||Turpin, Stolzenburg, et al. "Methods to Treat EP Toxic Foundry Wastes and Wastewaters", AFS Transactions, pp. 737-740.|
|10||*||Turpin, Stolzenburg, et al. Methods to Treat EP Toxic Foundry Wastes and Wastewaters , AFS Transactions, pp. 737 740.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5536899 *||Oct 5, 1994||Jul 16, 1996||Forrester; Keith E.||Stabilization of lead bearing waste|
|US5679259 *||Oct 10, 1995||Oct 21, 1997||Great Western Chemical Company||Method for recovering metals from solutions|
|US5722928 *||Jul 15, 1996||Mar 3, 1998||Forrester; Keith E.||Stabilization of lead bearing waste|
|US5789649 *||Aug 27, 1996||Aug 4, 1998||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Method for Remediating contaminated soils|
|US5840191 *||Feb 13, 1995||Nov 24, 1998||British Nuclear Fuels Plc||Process for the treatment of contaminated material|
|US5846178 *||Mar 2, 1998||Dec 8, 1998||Forrester; Keith E.||Stabilization of lead bearing waste|
|US5895832 *||Feb 13, 1995||Apr 20, 1999||British Nuclear Fuels Plc.||Process for the treatment of contaminated material|
|US6050929 *||Oct 8, 1996||Apr 18, 2000||Forrester; Keith Edward||Method for stabilizing heavy metal bearing waste in a waste generation stream|
|US6053857 *||May 15, 1998||Apr 25, 2000||Conversion Systems, Inc.||Immobilization of thallium during electric arc furnace dust treatment|
|US6132623 *||Jun 18, 1998||Oct 17, 2000||The University Of Connecticut||Immobilization of inorganic arsenic species using iron|
|US6186939||Jun 16, 1997||Feb 13, 2001||Keith E. Forrester||Method for stabilizing heavy metal in a material or waste|
|US6379559 *||Oct 5, 1998||Apr 30, 2002||Hideomi Iida||Method of making sludge precipitated in a chromium plating impurity recovery electrolysis tank harmless|
|US6387276||Aug 9, 2000||May 14, 2002||The University Of Connecticut||Immobilization of inorganic arsenic species using iron|
|US6596190 *||Jul 28, 2000||Jul 22, 2003||Hazama Corp.||Remediation agent for contaminated soil and method for the remediation of soil|
|US6689485||Apr 13, 2001||Feb 10, 2004||The Penn State Research Foundation||Powerful reductant for decontamination of groundwater and surface streams|
|US6758633||Sep 5, 2002||Jul 6, 2004||Gannett Fleming, Inc.||In-situ process for detoxifying hexavalent chromium in soil and groundwater|
|US6773486 *||Aug 27, 2002||Aug 10, 2004||Exothermic Distribution Corporation||Use of rice hull ash in steelmaking|
|US6857998 *||May 12, 2003||Feb 22, 2005||Free Flow Technologies, Inc.||Compositions and methods for treatment of solid waste|
|US6924409 *||Dec 19, 2001||Aug 2, 2005||Babcock & Wilcox Volund Aps||Method for reducing the leaching of oxyanion forming elements, in particular chromium, from hazardous waste|
|US6955501||May 13, 2004||Oct 18, 2005||Gannett Fleming, Inc.||In-situ process for detoxifying hexavalent chromium in soil and groundwater|
|US6991593 *||Dec 4, 2002||Jan 31, 2006||Heritage Environmental Services, Llc||Hazardous waste stabilization methods, products and testing procedures|
|US8177882||Apr 29, 2010||May 15, 2012||World Resources Company||Process for recovering metals and metal compounds from mined ore and other metal-bearing raw source materials|
|US20030051582 *||Aug 27, 2002||Mar 20, 2003||Pierre Vayda||Use of rice hull ash in steelmaking|
|US20030185630 *||Dec 4, 2002||Oct 2, 2003||Price Kenneth S.||Hazardous waste stabilization methods, products and testing procedures|
|US20040040914 *||Dec 19, 2001||Mar 4, 2004||Kasper Lundtorp||Method for reducing the leaching of oxyanion forming elements, in particular chromium, from hazardous waste|
|US20040091549 *||Oct 10, 2003||May 13, 2004||Forrester Keith E.||Reduction of arsenic and lead leaching in pressure treated wood and painted surfaces|
|US20040208705 *||May 13, 2004||Oct 21, 2004||Gannett Fleming, Inc.||In-situ process for detoxifying hexavalent chromium in soil and groundwater|
|US20060178548 *||Feb 8, 2006||Aug 10, 2006||Forrester Keith E||Method for stabilization of flyash and scrubber residues|
|US20100278686 *||Nov 4, 2010||Halpin Peter T||Process for recovering metals and metal compounds from mined ore and other metal-bearing raw source materials|
|US20110197710 *||Feb 12, 2010||Aug 18, 2011||The University Of Western Ontario||Making metal and bimetal nanostructures with controlled morphology|
|WO1999059680A1 *||May 17, 1999||Nov 25, 1999||Envirosafe Services Of Ohio, Inc.||Immobilization of thallium during electric arc furnace dust treatment|
|U.S. Classification||210/719, 210/912, 210/913, 588/256, 588/407, 588/412, 210/901, 405/129.25, 210/720, 210/914, 210/757, 588/319|
|International Classification||C02F1/70, C22B5/04|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S210/914, Y10S210/913, Y10S210/901, Y10S210/912, C02F1/705, C22B5/04|
|European Classification||C22B5/04, C02F1/70C|
|Feb 2, 1999||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jul 11, 1999||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Sep 7, 1999||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19990711