brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
insomniac at winterslight.org
Fri Jul 19 16:44:13 EST 2002
Mr. Vachss does not promote the idea that women are inferior, nor does he
promote the idea that women, more than men, are responsible for child abuse.
He doesn't skew statistics like you and your "friend" John Knight do.
Let's see what Mr. Vachss has to say about the way you've mis-used his
materials. He's getting a copy of this.
The Shadow Dancer
P.S. Start using Plain Text if you really want to get your message across.
"Richard C. August" <raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
news:_zWZ8.35919$Q43.1131387 at nnrp1.ptd.net...
I second your motion, if that can be done here.
Please, let us not forget that most of these "scores" on these "tests" were
determined FALSELY either by grading on a curve or by "recentering" the
scores, which is EXACTLY what the College Board did with SAT scores and
which, very likely, is what the TIMSS revisions of late did as well.
Face it, 9th Witch, until you have been faced with your own stupidity, you
will continually be deceived. You will be duped into thinking that the
dumbest blonde on the planet is a real Einstein, until you figure that she
can't even scratch her X mark on her Welfare application, and wouldn't know
what a signatory witness was if she screwed him.
We have women here in these United States who can barely apply lip gloss,
nail polish, and perfume. Yet, they are praised for their "brains" and
"intellect" simply because they can raise men's, er, uh, FANTASIES. They
are given a "fair shake" in life because they know how to have sex. Even
the dumbest animals on this planet can have sex! But thanks to them, and
jackbooted Feminazis like YOU, we men no longer want to have girlfriends,
much less marry. We desire to serve God Almighty as good men and husbands.
Thanks to feminism, VAWA 1 and 2, pornography, the TIMSS scores,
"recentering", and women in the workplace, we cannot.
SOooooooo, we end up in monasteries.......
Meanwhile, I guess you gals just have to suffer without us. And when you
find out that an increasing amount, percentage, and number of Domestic
Violence cases are INITIATED (read: STARTED) by WOMEN (!!!) against other
women, their children, and men, then you find that women aren't all that
nonviolent, are they?
Whatever happened to the protection from violence men can afford?
Shall I go on???
Forget it!! Check out the entire website at http://www.vachss.com.
Richard C. August
"to get out of the rat race, perhaps off the planet, and into a positive
spirituality and mindset,
and to become fully male again."
"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:fEVZ8.8866$Fq6.717539 at news2.west.cox.net...
> "The 9th Witch" <appalachian_witch at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ah5h4v$qdq01$1 at ID-131540.news.dfncis.de...
> > Bob LeChevalier <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
> > news:r0dcju48rkn9rrtcg9385hacfeak7ssf1i at 4ax.com...
> > > "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote:
> > > >> There are animals with more brain cells than humans have, no?
> > > >
> > > >Correct. "no". None of them. Even 9 foot apes have brains a
> > the
> > > >size of human brains. Dynasaurs had brains the size of an orange.
> > > >human brain is a quantum leap in size, quality, and output.
> > >
> > > The human brain is around 1400 grams. Porpoises have brains weighing
> > around
> > > 1700 grams.
> > > http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/kinser/Size1.html
> > >
> > > Elephants and whales have significantly larger brains than humans
> > > http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/kinser/Size5.html
> > > http://brainmuseum.org/Evolution/paleo/
> > > http://www.worldalmanacforkids.com/explore/animals/whale.html
> > > with elephants having brains 3 times the size of humans and sperm
> > > having brains more than 6 times the size of humans (20 pounds). Blue
> > whales
> > > have the largest brains
> > >
> > > lojbab
> > "At two, humans have the most brain cells that they will ever have in
> > lifetime. If these cells are not used, they are simply deleted."
> > http://students.ou.edu/I/Feather.K.Inman-1/concepts.html
> > "We now know that an infant's brain contains 100 billion cells, the most
> > brain cells a person will ever have."
> > http://www.nccic.org/pubs/mirrors/intro.html
> > How did infants score on your test, John? According to your theory,
> > they have more brain cells than either men or women, they should have
> > much higher than either category.
> You could only make such a silly observation if you lacked 3 1/2 billion
> brain cells from the start, which is the point: male babies also have 3
> billion more brain cells than female babies, just as adult males have 3
> billion more than adult females.
> The point you missed is that this is proof that the difference is by
> and not because of "discrimination" or some other silly feminazi theory.
> > "Women's brains are more tightly packed with cells in the area that
> > mental processes such as judgement, personality, planning and working
> > memory, researchers have discovered.
> > A team from McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, found that women have
> > to 15% more brain cell density in certain areas of the frontal lobe,
> > controls so-called higher mental processes. "
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1653000/1653687.stm
> Is this why men score 18-50% higher than women on ever test ever devised,
> across races, nations, and continents, and have since Day One?
> > "Women are just as good at math as men. At Earlham, half the math majors
> > women, and those women include some of our strongest majors. Half the
> > students in our elementary classes are women. A survey of recent
> > classes showed equal numbers of male and female students. The average
> > student scored about half a letter grade better than the average male
> > student. At the faculty level, half of Earlham's math professors are
> > and our female faculty members have published more scholarly papers in
> > mathematics than have their male colleagues. To anyone believing that
> > cannot do well at mathematics - or that men cannot do badly - our
> > offers abundant evidence to the contrary."
> > http://www.math.earlham.edu/WomensBrains.html
> Did you even notice that this completely ignores performance? Just because
> half the students sitting in a classroom is women is not proof of anything
> except their ability to waddle to class and plant their big fat as.es in a
> chair. Just because those teachers give girls a letter grade higher than
> they give boys (who score a standard deviation higher than on ALL
> *objective* tests), is proof that those teachers are too STUPID to even
> detect such huge differences in performance.
> Can you even imagine the mentality of a teacher teaching children all her
> life, never knowing that all boys across the world, throughout history,
> across all races, score a full standard deviation higher than girls in
> Why should we even permit such ignorant "teachers" to get anywhere near
> > "Neanderthals had larger brains than we do, she pointed out, but
> > they weren't smarter."
> How does she know that? Did she test Neanderthal? He left behind some
> excellent art, something that not a single nigger in Africa, with very
> brains, were ever able to accomplish.
> > "Overall, however, men lose slightly more brain cells than do women"
> > http://www.csuchico.edu/pub/inside/archive/98_04_09/brain.html
> Men could lose a billion more brain cells than women and still have an
> 2 1/2 billion to play with--but "slightly more" is most likely nowhere
> to a billion, wouldn't you say? Why are you quoting these typical
> nonsensical feminazi statements?
> > "The exact reason for this difference is not known, but the opinion of
> > experts is that it is simply related to a larger body size in man (the
> > cell muscles you have, more brain cells you need). This difference
> > not be interpreted as a difference in intelligence or memory."
> > http://www.epub.org.br/cm/perguntas/031-how-many-cells.html
> This is precisely the absurd, silly, nonsensical, uneducated, ignorant,
> illogical "reasoning" we might expect from a 3 1/2 billion brain cell
> limited brain--so you know it's not true, don't you? As already noted
> in your other absurd, silly, nonsensical, uneducated, ignorant, illogical
> statement, it takes PRECISELY the same amount of memory, computer power,
> brain cells to operate a human male baby's body as it does to operate an
> adult male body.
> Don't you ever check your work?
> > "At this point, researchers do not know how the structural differences
> > influence brain function. It's possible that male and female brains work
> > a similar capacity but process information differently. For example, one
> > study shows that men and women perform equally well in a test that asks
> > subjects to read a list of nonsense words and determine if they rhyme.
> > imaging results found that women use areas on the right and left sides
> > the brain, while men only use areas on the left side to complete the
> Also note that Wechsler found that men far outperform women on the 94% of
> the "IQ problems" which he eliminated from his "IQ test", which is clear
> evidence that women perform "equally" to men in only 6% of these problems,
> and my bet is that it was something like these "nonsense words".
> > Other research suggests that, on average, the female brain
> > better on some skills while the male brain executes other tasks at a
> > level. For example, tests show that women generally can recall lists of
> > words or paragraphs of text better than men. On the other hand, men
> > perform better on tests that require the ability to mentally rotate an
> > in order to solve a problem. Mental rotation is thought to help people
> > their way, according to researchers. Does that leave the majority of
> > lost? Obviously not. Scientists believe that women may rely on their
> > advantage and recall landmarks to find a destination."
> > http://web.sfn.org/content/Publications/BrainBriefings/gender.brain.html
> > Have a nice day. Or not. Your choice...
> > T9W
> Which ignores that this difference in construction is precisely why men
> a 42% advantage over women in hand/eye-oriented Olympic events like
> springboard, or are one quarter as likely per mile driven to have an auto
> accident, or one third as likely per mile flown to have an airplane
> accident, or score 18-50% higher on ever standardized test which even
> feminazis have managed to create.
> The fact that you're willing to accept this statement carte blanche,
> any statistical evidence to back it up, or even a quantification of some
> type to give you perspective, is evidence enough of your ability to be
> misled by intentionally misleading and erroneous statements like this.
> This is exactly the problem. This is exactly why so many American girls
> went into the TIMSS test with the objective of providing the right answer,
> but came out having scored lower on the test than if they had merely
> You girls were deceived. You were deceived by some of the world's best
> experts at deception. And you're obviously just as incapable of
> why or who did it as you are at adequately verifying and carefully
> critiquing these above statements, which is exactly how feminist mass
> hysteria propagates.
> John Knight
More information about the Neur-sci