But every time I wrote a few lines of what was meant to be a prose poem, I would see a place a linebreak would add a double meaning or increase tension or serve some other function particular to the linebreak, and I would end up lineating what I was working on.
I felt about prose poems like that famous quote about pornography: I can't exactly say what it is, but I know it when I see it. Well, it turns out I was wrong. Because in desperation at failing once again at writing a prose poem, I decided to gather some information about them in order to focus my thinking.
Searching around online, here are a few things I read about prose poems that I ALREADY knew, but which are stated interestingly enough to catch my attention:
As quoted on the Poets.org website, here is Peter Johnson's explanation of a prose poem (Johnson is editor of The Prose Poem: An International Journal), "Just as black humor straddles the fine line between comedy and tragedy, so the prose poem plants one foot in prose, the other in poetry, both heels resting precariously on banana peels."
Here's what Robert Hass, in an interview with the Iowa Review, had to say: "I was working in these forms because they had a certain outwardness that verse didn’t have."
Prose is the ordinary language that people use in speaking or writing. It does not treat the line as a formal unit. It has no repetitive pattern of rhythm or meter.
In a prose poem:
- The writing is continuous and without line breaks.
- The piece may be of any length and may be divided into paragraphs. A single sentence or sentence fragment can be a prose poem, as can multiple paragraphs.
- The natural rhythm of thought can lead to rhythmical cadences in a prose poem.
- Internal rhyme and alliteration and repetition can be used. Some such trait of poetry must be present. Otherwise it is prose, not a prose poem.
- It lies between free verse and prose.
- Usually has compressed thought and intensity.
Wait a minute, what is the 2nd bullet point? A prose poem can be divided into paragraphs? It doesn't have to be a single Russell Edson-style block? But I've written four or five of those. Pieces that started out as poems but in which it became clear linebreaks added nothing, despite the poetic devices otherwise used. Short paragraphs of 2 or 3 lines each, which organically wrapped around at the end of the line to the next line, so that stanzas ended up looking more like.....really short paragraphs.
So I've written prose poems? I've actually published some, not knowing it?
It turns out that despite my previous confidence, I couldn't recognize prose poems, or not all prose poems, because I was stuck on the blocky single-paragraph form as an identifying feature. Which it isn't necessarily.
And even better, I didn't even know a prose poem when I'd written one, not out of a concerted effort to do so, but because the poem took on the form that naturally suited it as it developed. Which is the best way for a form to turn up in a poem. For me anyway.
I'll never be a prose poem pro myself, but I'm glad I've got a few prose poems in my repertoire, however unwittingly they came to be there. And now I can stop trying so hard.