|Publication number||US5512257 A|
|Application number||US 08/449,845|
|Publication date||30 Apr 1996|
|Filing date||24 May 1995|
|Priority date||22 Jan 1990|
|Also published as||CA2053443A1, DE59102827D1, EP0482335A1, EP0482335B1|
|Publication number||08449845, 449845, US 5512257 A, US 5512257A, US-A-5512257, US5512257 A, US5512257A|
|Original Assignee||Von Roll Umwelttechnik Ag|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (19), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (16), Classifications (20), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/144,615, filed on Nov. 1, 1993, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 07/793,952, filed Oct. 22, 1991, abandoned.
The present invention broadly relates to a process for treating or purifying flue gases or fly ash and, more specifically, pertains to a new and improved process for the removal of heavy metals from the fly ash from an incineration plant, especially a waste incinerator.
Generally speaking, the process of the present invention is of the type according to which the resulting fly ash is subjected to treatment with an acidic aqueous solution and the liquid is separated from the residual solid matter by filtration.
Flue particulates come as a result in heating installations and incineration plants and are removed from the flue gases by means of fabric-base filters or electrostatic filters. These flue particulates, particularly in waste incinerators, contain heavy metals. The presence of soluble heavy-metal salts prohibits direct dumping of the flue particulates.
A process of the aforementioned type is known, for example, from German Patent No. 3,320,466, published Dec. 13, 1984 and its cognate U.S. Pat. No. 4,617,180, granted Oct. 14, 1986. According to the process disclosed therein for purifying flue gases developed during combustion of waste materials, the heavy metals are removed from the flue particulates by treatment with the acidic aqueous solution resulting in the flue-gas washing or scrubbing process. The washing condensate from such washing process is combined with the flue ash to partially dissolve the heavy metals and extract them from the flue ash. Following solid-liquid separation, the acidic aqueous solution, essentially composed of the washing condensate and the dissolved heavy metals, is subjected to heavy metal precipitation. The residue remaining subsequent to the acidic extraction still contains soluble metal compounds and therefore cannot be directly dumped. Accordingly, the residue must be either previously bound within a matrix, e.g. cement or bitumen, or returned to the combustion system in order to bind it into the slag during the incineration process.
The binding or retention in a matrix does not prove satisfactory for various reasons. According to environmental conditions, cement is sooner or later hydrolyzed, whereby the metal salts are set free. Water is entrained while returning or recycling the filtration residue to the combustion furnace. This adversely affects the energy balance.
Therefore, with the foregoing in mind, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide a new and improved process for treating flue particulates and thereby removing heavy metals from the fly ash of an incineration plant, and which is not afflicted with the drawbacks and limitations of prior art processes.
Another and more specific object of the present invention aims at providing a new and improved process for the treatment of flue particulates and by means of which the direct dumping of the treated product is rendered possible.
Now in order to implement these and still other objects of the present invention, which will become more readily apparent as the description proceeds, the process of the present development is manifested, among other things, by the step of treating the filtration residue with an aqueous solution of a precipitant or precipitating agent for heavy metals.
By means of the process according to the invention the soluble heavy-metal salts, which have not yet been removed after the acidic washing or extraction, are converted to an insoluble form.
Subsequent to the treatment with the precipitant or precipitating agent, the filtration residue, which practically no longer contains any soluble heavy metals and can be directly dumped, can be washed with some water for the purpose of removing the precipitant or precipitating agent.
The filtrate and the liquids from the treatment of the filtration residue can be brought together. The heavy metals are precipitated from this aggregate or combined liquid. The resulting sludge is upgraded and conducted to metal recovery. Bringing together these liquids enables using in excess the precipitation agent during the treatment of the filtration residue, since non-spent precipitants are automatically spent while precipitating the heavy metals.
According to another variant of the inventive process, the washing water of the filtration residue can be conducted to the flue-gas scrubber.
The choice of the precipitant or precipitating agent for the treatment of the filtration residue depends on the type of the burned or incinerated material and is also determined by economic considerations. Examples of suitable precipitants are caustic alkalis or earthy base hydroxides, for instance calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2, and inorganic as well as organic sulfides.
It is advantageous to add a soluble alkaline-earth compound, preferably a barium compound, to the mixture of fly ash and acidic washing water. In this manner, sulfates present in excess in the flue-gas washing liquid are precipitated. This contributes, on the one hand, to the inerting of the fly ash to be dumped or disposed and, on the other hand, to the reduction of the quantity of the dissolved solids present during heavy-metal precipitation as well as of the quantity of the resulting sludge. The latter leads to a more economical process in the following recovery of the heavy metals.
The removal of ammonia or ammonium salts from the fly ash can be effected by heating prior to carrying out the acidic scrubbing. On the other hand, removal of ammonia or ammonium salts from the neutralized washing liquid, i.e. the filtrate, can be effected by stripping.
The process and the inventive steps thereof are now illustrated with the aid of the following example, which is included for illustration purposes only and is not necessarily meant to limit the invention.
On an average, the following materials result from incinerating or burning one ton of waste or garbage:
approximately 300 kg sludge,
approximately 25 kg fly ash, and
approximately 112 kg acidic washing water from the wet flue-gas purification, containing 4.5 kg hydrogen chloride (HCl) and 3.0 kg sodium sulfate (Na2 SO4).
To begin with, mercury is removed from the acidic washing water or liquid by means of an ion exchanger resin. The 25 kg fly ash are treated with the 112 kg of acidic washing water during 30 minutes and at a pH of 3 in a vessel or boiler provided with an agitator or agitating machine. Mobile and mobilizable heavy metals are thereby dissolved. The obtained suspension is given or conducted to a vacuum belt filter. The fly ash freed from the heavy metals and remaining on the filter as inert residue is washed first with a solution containing 0.5 to 2.0 g/l TMT 15 and 0.5 to 2.0 g/l Ca(OH)2 and then washed with water, TMT 15 being a 15 percent solution of the precipitant trimercapto-S-triazine (C3 H3 N3 S3). There is thereby used a total amount of 3 liters liquid per 1 liter fly ash, 1 kg fly ash corresponding to approximately 2 liters.
The heavy metals are precipitated from the united or combined liquids, i.e. filtrate and washing liquids, in that 3400 g of Ca(OH)2 (dry) are added in water. The resulting sludge is dewatered in a filter press. The filter cake, which is designated as the heavy-metal concentrate, is then conducted to the metal-recovery process.
The following Table I shows a material balance of the process. The indications of weight indicate the quantity of dry substance. All indications of percentage refer to the dry-substance quantity which is brought in with the fly ash and the acidic washing water from the wet or wet-chemical flue-gas purification, such dry-substance quantity representing 100%.
TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________ heavy-metal total in g inert residue concentrate waste water (= 100%) in g in % in g in % in g in %__________________________________________________________________________dry substance 30500 16200 53.1 1700 5.6 16000 41.3 (*)Cl 6300 <10 <0.15 17 0.26 15973 99.6SO4 2800 2500 89.3 50 1.8 250 8.9Zn 1070 380 35.5 690 64.5 <0.5 <0.05Pb 356 286 80.3 70 19.7 <0.1 <0.03Cd 14.4 1.6 11.1 12.8 88.9 <0.01 <0.05Hg 1.42 0.09 6.3 0.03 2.1 <.001 <0.07 (**)__________________________________________________________________________ (*) 3400 g of CA(OH)2 (computed as dry substance) are added during precipitation of the heavy metals. (**) 91.6% of mercury are removed by the Hgpreprecipitation.
The extraction or precipitation yields with respect to the starting material `fly ash` are thus as follows:
dry substance: 35%, cadmium (Cd): 89%, zinc (Zn): 65% and lead (Pb): 20%.
The composition of the fly ash designated as inert residue and freed from heavy metals is listed in the following Table II.
TABLE II______________________________________ Content according to the TVA Total Content eluate test(*)Material g/kg mg/l______________________________________Cl 0.69SO4 173.0Zn 11.60 3.85Pb 8.40 0.24Cd 0.05 0.08Hg 0.008 <0.001______________________________________ (*) The TVA eluate test (Technische Verordnung fur Abfalle, i.e. `Technical Regulations regarding Waste`, issued by the Swiss Federal Ministry of the Interior) is a standardized process for determining whether waste acceptance requirements for direct dumping are met or not. The values obtained by virtue of the inventive process for treating flue particulates are below the limiting values specified in the fourth appendix (Anhang 4) of the TVA. In other words, fly ash treated according to the inventive process is suitable for direct dumping.
The composition of the filter cake, which was obtained by precipitation of the heavy metals from the waste water, i.e. filtrate and washing water, is listed in the following Table III.
TABLE III______________________________________Material Content in g/kg______________________________________Cl 4.9SO4 27.0Zn 290.0Pb 44.0Cd 6.0Hg <0.01______________________________________
This filter cake is conducted to the metal recovery process.
While there is shown and described the present preferred example of the inventive process, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto, but may be otherwise variously practiced within the scope of the following claims. ACCORDINGLY,
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3953306 *||3 Oct 1973||27 Apr 1976||Dart Environment And Services Company||Metal recovery from waste treatment sludges|
|US4193854 *||21 Nov 1978||18 Mar 1980||Union Carbide Corporation||Heavy metal removal from wastewater sludge|
|US4222769 *||19 Dec 1978||16 Sep 1980||Diamon Engineering Co., Ltd.||Process of regenerating and recovering lead sulphate-containing wastes|
|US4338200 *||30 Jul 1980||6 Jul 1982||Akzo N.V.||Process for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous liquids|
|US4342732 *||17 Jul 1980||3 Aug 1982||Smith Robert H||Sludge fixation and stabilization|
|US4354942 *||26 Nov 1980||19 Oct 1982||Olin Corporation||Stabilization of mercury in mercury-containing materials|
|US4617180 *||6 Jun 1984||14 Oct 1986||Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh||Process for purifying flue gas|
|US4911757 *||9 May 1989||27 Mar 1990||Bethlehem Steel Corporation||Process for chemical stabilization of heavy metal bearing dusts and sludges|
|US5041398 *||22 Feb 1989||20 Aug 1991||Wheaton Industries||Method for treating incinerator ash|
|US5045115 *||25 Sep 1989||3 Sep 1991||Sulzer Brothers Limited||Method for treating solid residues containing heavy metals from combustion plants|
|US5173286 *||19 Jul 1991||22 Dec 1992||Mobil Oil Corporation||Fixation of elemental mercury present in spent molecular sieve desiccant for disposal|
|DE3320466A1 *||7 Jun 1983||13 Dec 1984||Kernforschungsz Karlsruhe||Process for purifying flue gas|
|EP0244910A1 *||4 May 1987||11 Nov 1987||Hoogovens Groep B.V.||Separation of non-ferrous metals from iron-containing powdery material|
|EP0304412A2 *||18 Jul 1988||22 Feb 1989||AUSTRIAN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT SGP/WAAGNER-BIRO GmbH||Process for treating combustion residues from an incinerator, in particular a waste incinerator|
|EP0324454A1 *||11 Jan 1989||19 Jul 1989||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Process and apparatus for cleaning smoke|
|EP0362125A1 *||7 Aug 1989||4 Apr 1990||Gebrüder Sulzer Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the treatment of solid incinerator plant residues containing a heavy metal|
|JPS532381A *||Title not available|
|JPS547778A *||Title not available|
|NL7304233A *||Title not available|
|1||*||Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 6, No. 180 (C 125) (1058), Sep. 14, 1982 & JP A 57 94383, Jun. 11, 1982, T. Kuwabara, et al., Treatment of Incineration Ash .|
|2||Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 6, No. 180 (C-125) (1058), Sep. 14, 1982 & JP-A-57-94383, Jun. 11, 1982, T. Kuwabara, et al., "Treatment of Incineration Ash".|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5645730 *||29 Apr 1996||8 Jul 1997||Envirocorp Services & Technology, Inc.||Acid wastewater treatement|
|US6001152 *||29 May 1997||14 Dec 1999||Sinha; Rabindra K.||Flue gas conditioning for the removal of particulates, hazardous substances, NOx, and SOx|
|US6267795||9 Jul 1999||31 Jul 2001||John Givargis||Air cleaning system|
|US6500395||21 Sep 2000||31 Dec 2002||Institut National De La Recherche Scientifique||Method for removing metals from air pollution control residues|
|US6613130||1 Oct 2001||2 Sep 2003||G.E.N. Industries Corp||Filtering system for removing combustion gases from an airflow|
|US6679823||4 May 2001||20 Jan 2004||Envirosafe Services Of Ohio, Inc.||Treatment of electric arc furnace dust to resist acid and alkaline leaching of heavy metals|
|US6726888||25 Jan 2002||27 Apr 2004||General Electric Company||Method to decrease emissions of nitrogen oxide and mercury|
|US6790264||7 Mar 2001||14 Sep 2004||Isg Resources, Inc.||Control of ammonia emission from ammonia laden fly ash in concrete|
|US6863005||1 Dec 2003||8 Mar 2005||General Electric Company||Process to reduce mercury emission|
|US7635796 *||22 Dec 2009||Kuen-Sen Chang||Method for removing heavy metals from incinerator fly ashes|
|US20030205173 *||7 Mar 2001||6 Nov 2003||Minkara Rafic Y.||Control of ammonia emission from ammonia laden fly ash in concrete|
|US20040134396 *||1 Dec 2003||15 Jul 2004||Lanier William Steven||Process to reduce mercury emission|
|US20050129600 *||31 Jan 2005||16 Jun 2005||Lanier William S.||Product and process to reduce mercury emission|
|US20050137444 *||20 Dec 2004||23 Jun 2005||Kuen-Sen Chang||Method for removing heavy metals from incinerator fly ashes|
|US20090151609 *||15 Dec 2007||18 Jun 2009||Hoskinson Gordon H||Incinerator with pivoting grating system|
|EP0940166A1 *||20 Oct 1998||8 Sep 1999||CT Umwelttechnik AG||Processing of residual material and fumes|
|U.S. Classification||423/98, 588/318, 588/404, 106/DIG.1, 423/109, 210/912|
|International Classification||B09B3/00, C22B7/02, C04B20/02|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02P10/212, C04B20/02, C22B7/02, B09B3/0016, B09B2220/06, Y02W30/92, Y10S210/912, Y10S106/01|
|European Classification||B09B3/00B, C04B20/02, C22B7/02|
|12 Feb 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: VON ROLL UMWELTTECHNIK AG, SWITZERLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VON ROLL HOLDING AG;REEL/FRAME:007804/0691
Effective date: 19960208
|23 Nov 1999||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|30 Apr 2000||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|11 Jul 2000||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20000430