[rfc-i] Determining output type in v3
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu May 8 12:56:46 PDT 2014
On 2014-05-08 18:46, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-05-08 18:29, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On May 8, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> I would like the draft name to be preserved after the document
>>> becomes an RFC. For those who work on a document for a long time it
>>> is the name that is remembered, and ought to remain available.
>> Good call. Added.
> The suspense is killing me :-) What exactly did you add? Does it work in
> existing processors?
FWIW, rfc2629.xslt and xml2rfcv2 render both the rfc number and the
docName when both are available. xml2rfcv1 suppresses the docName (which
seems to be the right behavior to me).
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest