Stan Jones on Crime
The aggressor could remain free but would still have to pay the debt. Those aggressors who did not pay would go to a working prison. In that case the amount owed by the aggressor would be increased by the costs of imprisonment. Most aggressors would probably make the payments rather than risk the huge increase in obligation and the loss of their liberty for such a long time.
This entire system could eventually be privatized-police, courts, jails-all of it! The aggressors would eventually pay for all of it. Crime would be significantly reduced.
|Other candidates on Crime:||Stan Jones on other issues:|
Pres.George W. Bush
2006 Senate retirements:
2006 Senate Races:
(CT)Lieberman v.Lamont v.Schlesinger
(MD)Cardin v.Steele v.Zeese
(MS)Lott v.Fleming v.Bowlin
(WA)Cantwell v.McGavick v.Guthrie
(WI)Kohl v.Vogeler v.Redick
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
Senate Votes (analysis)