SCIENTISTS have been warned that their latest experiments may accidently produce monkeys with brains more human than animal.
In cutting-edge experiments, scientists have injected human brain cells into monkey fetuses to study the effects.
Critics argue that if these fetuses are allowed to develop into self-aware subjects, science will be thrown into an ethical nightmare.
An eminent committee of American scientists will call for restrictions into the research, saying the outcome of such studies cannot be predicted and may in fact produce subjects with a 'super-animal' intelligence.
Good comment arthur! It is funny that the way that evolutionsts try to prove that we are decended from apes because our dna is almost the same,but of course that doesn't mean anything.actually if a banna were the complete opposite of our dna or any other food for that matter it is deadly to eat.
President's Council on Bioethics March meeting discussed the "reasonable boundaries" between "acceptable" research and the kind that would amount to "high-tech bestiality."
In Congress, Senator Sam Brownback (R) of Kansas has introduced a bill that would "ban the production of human-animal chimeras." If passed, the United States would join Canada in prohibiting this kind of research.
Even the magazine SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN says that some human-animal chimeras "disquietingly blur the line between species." It notes that "no one knows what the consequences will be as the proportion of human cells in an animal increases."
One possible consequence is that this "intermingling of tissues could . . .make it easier for infectious animal diseases to move into humans. . . . This hopping of species barriers can be particularly Devastating because the [human] immune systems . . . are so unprepared for them." The list of pandemics thought to have originated in such "hopping" includes the 1918 flu pandemic that killed at least 40 million people, SYPHILIS(SHEEP),GONORRHEA(DOGS) HIV/AIDS(MONKEYS).
More on (MORON)The Descent of Man? http://www.rae.org/descent.html "Of course, this is to turn Darwinism upside down. It is in fact to propose that the human form is in a real but mysterious sense archetypal and therefore anterior to all other mammals and probably to all animals. It is to suggest that all the animals have in fact descended from a human ancestor i.e. that the presumed, but so far undiscovered and probably undiscoverable 'common ancestor' was human rather than animal (though not fossil human). It is to acknowledge that the facts appear to confirm the ancient belief: "Man is the Measure of All Things". This may appear surprising to many, but I am convinced that no other interpretation is possible and in fact I challenge any Darwinian to offer a detailed and convincing explanation in terms of the current theory."
The Descent of Man? http://www.rae.org/descent.html
A recent BBC radio programme on evolution and human origins questioned the conventional view that the species homo is the latest offshoot of the primate line - in effect, as Darwin himself believed, descended from the ancestors of present-day apes. There is apparently some reason (for those who accept the myto of evolutionism) to believe that man's closest relatives, the chimpanzees, may be the later arrival, having descended from ancestors of today's humans, rather than the reverse.
The brain cells came from a mixture of murderers, doctors, scientists, school teachers, drug junkies, McDonald's cooks, Drive thru cashier @ Jack in the Box, 5 Priests, a slew of Muslim Radicals, construction workers, 3 world leaders, ex-terroists @ Gitmo, and few other bad apples such as an army of CROOKED LAWYERS from the tobacco industry!!!...In other words a multipersonality destructive messed up FAR FAR LEFT WING specie.
Sounds like alot of monkey business going here...better keep your eyes "peeled".
Did the article mention where the human brain cells implanted into the monkeys came from? I have a feeling that I may not like the answer.
Good point, Neil. Just what is self-awareness? Some time ago I seem to remember seeing that phrase listed as a desired trait in the "women-seeking-men" section of the newspaper!
What these poor evolutionsts continue to fail to realize is that animals will NEVER have a human soul, even if we were to give them an entire human brain to "think" with.
Only God can do this, and it most certainly is THIS soul, along with any/all other "in-the-image-of-God" traits that we have apart from animals that contributes heavilly to the "human characteristics" our evolutionary friends observe.
What "ethical nightmare"? Killing (oops, "terminating") children on the wrong side of the birth canal doesn't seem to keep many scientists awake at night anymore, so why worry here? Much of this biomedical "ethics" talk is just a sham, IMHO. All ethics is predicated upon one's philosophical assumptions, which most prominent scientists are silent about, either from ignorance or deceit.
If something can't talk to us, then it can't tell us much about its self-awareness. And even if it can, a measure of self-awareness depends heavily upon how that is defined.
Closing the gap. We already have people with sub-human intelligence that are puppets of satan. They call them 'Islamic extremists' and 'suicide bombers'. Pity the poor monkeys these fool scientists monkey with.