Framing events in Gaza in the colonial context is vital for understanding the nature of the violence, argues author.
By Ben White
"While it is common knowledge that a majority of the
population of the Gaza Strip are refugees, it is less well understood where they
came from. The shocking reality is that many of the inhabitants of the Gaza
Strip are a few miles away from the land of their ethnically cleansed former
villages, across the border fence in southern Israel. Like so much else with
Palestine, you can't understand Gaza if you don't understand the
To give a few examples. In 1948, most of the Palestinians of
al-Majdal had fled in fear by the time the Israeli army took the town. In
November of that year, around 500 were expelled to Gaza. But during 1949, a good
number of Palestinians managed to return. Those remaining Palestinians were
"concentrated and sealed off with barbed wire and IDF guards in a small,
built-up area commonly known as the 'ghetto'".
The ethnic cleansing of al-Majdal was completed between June
and October 1950. And if you haven't heard of al-Majdal before, I'm sure you
know the Israeli port city built in its place: Ashkelon.
Or take the village of Najd, whose inhabitants cultivated
citrus, bananas, cereals and orchards. They were expelled by Israeli forces in
May 1948 and you can find Palestinians from Najd in Jabaliya refugee camp. The
Israeli city of Sderot was founded on its land. .....
Framing events in Gaza in the colonial context is vital for
understanding the nature of the violence, as well as the separation and sealing
off of the territory, a microcosm of fragmented Palestine. The colonial paradigm
brings the focus back to the Nakba, to the foundational act of ethnic cleansing
and ongoing policies of exclusion. It is a reminder that the answers for Gaza
are the same as those for Jerusalem, the southern Hebron Hills and the Galilee:
decolonisation, implementation of the Palestinian people's rights - and
international sanction of Israel until such a goal is realised."