Problem is in NP
You can easily verify an answer to your problem: if a path is given, and it is goes from $s$ to $t$ and has $k$ edges with distinct vertices, then it is correct.
Reduction from Hamiltonian Cycle Problem
You can pick any vertex as $s$, and then for each neighbor, $(s,t_i)\in E$, attempt your algorithm, with $k=\left|V\right|-1$ after cutting that edge. If the algorithm succeeds for any attempt with $(s,t_i)$, then you have found a Hamiltonian cycle. This means Hamiltonian path reduces to your given problem.
Given that it is in NP, and the Hamiltonian Cycle Problem can be reduced to it, it is NP-complete.
I suppose an even simpler reduction is just to set $s = t$, and for any vertex in $V$, with $k=\left|V\right|-1$.
Though I am unsure of how one would solve this problem given $s,t,k,V,E$ in the general case. Nor do I know how to reduce this problem to the Hamiltonian cycle problem. A roundabout way would be to reduce this problem to 3-SAT, and then reduce the result back down to Hamiltonian cycle. However, as I pointed out above, you can easily see it is NP-complete, due a reduction from Hamiltonian cycle to this problem, in conjunction with the fact that the problem is in NP (you can verify the answer easily).
k-Stroll / k-Tour
A similar problem is named the k-Stroll problem in Approximation Algorithms for the Directed k-Tour and k-Stroll Problems:
The input to the k-Stroll problem is a directed $n$-vertex graph with nonnegative edge lengths, an integer $k$, and two special vertices $s$ and $t$. The goal is to find a minimum-length $s$-$t$ walk, containing at least $k$ distinct vertices.
Also related is the k-Tour problem, which is the case where $s=t$.