Not Available, The Patient Self-determination Act of 1990. §§4206, 4751 of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub L No 101- 508
D Advance medical directives. JAMA.
1990;2632365- 2367Link to Article
American Geriatrics Society Public Policy Committee, AGS Position Statement: Medical Treatment Decisions Concerning Elderly Persons. New York, NY American Geriatrics Society1991;
American Association of Retired Persons, Tomorrow's Choices: Preparing Now for Future Legal, Financial, and Health Care Decisions. Washington, DC American Association of Retired Persons1988;
The Hastings Center, Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying. Bloomington Indiana University Press1987;
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, DC US Government Printing Office1983;
L Due process of euthanasia: the living will, a proposal. Indiana Law J. 1969;44539- 554
J Advance care planning: priorities for ethical and empirical research. Hastings Cent Rep.
S32- S36Link to Article
RM Ethical dimensions of advance directives and surrogate decision making in the United States. Sass
Reds.Advance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making in Health Care United States, Germany, & Japan. Baltimore, Md Johns Hopkins University Press1998;66- 91
KC Understanding of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences by physicians and nurses. West J Med. 1989;150705- 707
KC Physicians' and spouses' predictions of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences. J Gerontol.
1988;43M115- M121Link to Article
B Health care decisions among elderly long-term care residents and their potential proxies. Arch Intern Med.
1989;1491367- 1372Link to Article
BE Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? Ann Intern Med.
1991;11592- 98Link to Article
CK Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist.
1989;29615- 621Link to Article
et al. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med.
1998;128621- 629Link to Article
et al. Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences. Arch Fam Med.
1995;4518- 524Link to Article
WD Physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment. J Fam Pract. 1993;37469- 475
JM After the Patient Self-determination Act: the need for empirical research on formal advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep.
1993;2320- 24Link to Article
EJ The medical directive: a new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA.
1989;2613288- 3293Link to Article
LL The health care directive: learning how to draft advance care documents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;391221- 1228
AS Limitations of listing specific medical interventions in advance directives. JAMA.
1991;266825- 828Link to Article
LB Projecting patients' preferences for living wills: an invalid strategy for management of dementia with life-threatening illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42997- 1003
LB The values history: the evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives. J Fam Pract. 1991;32145- 153
WD Fates worse than death: the role of valued life activities in health-state evaluations. Health Psychol.
1996;15332- 343Link to Article
J Putting advance-care planning into action. J Clin Ethics. 1996;7205- 213
PA Advance care planning as a process: structuring the discussions in practice. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43440- 446
et al. Comparing the functional status of elderly individuals agreeing and refusing to participate in a medical study [abstract]. Gerontologist. 1995;35350
WD Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatments: the role of impairment, prognosis, and pain. Death Stud.
1999;23617- 634Link to Article
WD Actual and perceived stability of life-sustaining treatment preferences. J Clin Ethics. In press.
WD Gender differences in older adults' preferences for life-sustaining medical treatments and end-of-life values. Death Stud. In press.
Not Available, Grammatik IV [computer program]. Version 2.0. San Francisco, Calif Reference Software International1991;
CD The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care.
1992;30473- 483Link to Article
DL Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am J Prev Med. 1994;1077- 84
CW A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc.
1955;501096- 1121Link to Article
J Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc1996;
LL Proxy decision making for incompetent patients: an ethical and empirical analysis. JAMA.
1992;2672067- 2071Link to Article
R Revising the substituted judgment standard. J Clin Ethics. 1995;630- 38
The SUPPORT Investigators, A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA.
1995;2741591- 1598Link to Article
et al. Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients? J Clin Ethics. 1994;523- 30
et al. The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45513- 518
et al. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the Patient Self-determination Act and the SUPPORT intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45500- 507
et al. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45508- 512
et al. A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med.
1991;324882- 888Link to Article
RM Relationship of advance directives to physician-patient communication. Arch Intern Med.
1994;154909- 913Link to Article
B How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med.
1995;10436- 442Link to Article
R Promoting the use of advance directives: an empirical study. Arch Fam Med.
1995;4609- 615Link to Article
B Increasing the completion of the durable power of attorney for health care: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA.
1994;271209- 212Link to Article
RD Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs. Ann Intern Med.
1992;117599- 606Link to Article
F Mirror of America: fear of dying. Gallup Poll News Service. 1991;551- 6
S Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA.
1995;274820- 825Link to Article
E The influence of ethnicity and race on attitudes toward advance directives, life-prolonging treatments, and euthanasia. J Clin Ethics. 1993;4155- 165
et al. Ethnicity and decision-makers in a group of frail older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46280- 286
LJ Ethnicity and advance care directives. J Law Med Ethics.
1996;24108- 117Link to Article
et al. Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project: Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Circulation.
1998;98648- 655Link to Article
EJ Advance directives for medical care: a case for greater use. N Engl J Med.
1991;324889- 895Link to Article
JD Advance directives: can patients' stated treatment choices be used to infer unstated choices? Med Care.
1994;3295- 105Link to Article
LL Advance directives: do they work? J Am Coll Cardiol.
1995;2535- 38Link to Article
RM The Ziggy Theorem: toward an outcomes-focused health psychology. Health Psychol.
1994;13451- 460Link to Article
JW Health related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol.
1982;161- 80Link to Article
DL States worse than death: a role for quality of life in advance care directives [abstract]. Gerontologist. 1991;31
et al. Insights pertaining to patient assessments of states worse than death. J Clin Ethics. 1993;433- 41
RM Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. J Gen Intern Med.
1998;13447- 454Link to Article
PB More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med.
1994;96432- 438Link to Article
T Myth of substituted judgment: surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch Intern Med.
1994;15490- 96Link to Article
M Advance directives for elderly people: worthwhile cause or wasted effort? Social Work. 1995;40397- 401
CD The HIV-specific advance directive. J Gen Intern Med.
1997;12729- 735Link to Article
HR Ineffectiveness of the SUPPORT intervention: review of explanations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48
et al. Rethinking fundamental assumptions: SUPPORT's implications for future reform. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48
KM Modal preferences predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do. Med Decis Making.
2000;20271- 280Link to Article
PE Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical-statistical controversy. Psychol Public Policy Law.
1996;2293- 323Link to Article
PE Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science.
1989;2431668- 1674Link to Article
E Stability of elderly persons' expressed preferences regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments. Soc Sci Med.
1999;3303- 311Link to Article
DL Stability of choices about life-sustaining treatments. Ann Intern Med.
1994;120567- 573Link to Article
MJ Advance directives: stability of patients' treatment choices. Arch Intern Med.
1994;154209- 217Link to Article
WD Accuracy of primary care and hospital-based physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' treatment preferences with and without advance directives. Arch Intern Med.
2001;161431- 440Link to Article
et al. Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48
B How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed? JAMA.
1992;26759- 63Link to Article
M Quality end-of-life care: patient's perspectives. JAMA.
1999;281163- 168Link to Article
J What is wrong with end-of-life care? opinions of bereaved family members. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;451339- 1344
et al. End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999;10286- 293
et al. Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48