|Publication number||US6402801 B1|
|Application number||US 09/632,945|
|Publication date||Jun 11, 2002|
|Filing date||Aug 4, 2000|
|Priority date||May 1, 1998|
|Also published as||CA2417933A1, CN1468203A, EP1305269A2, WO2002012139A2|
|Publication number||09632945, 632945, US 6402801 B1, US 6402801B1, US-B1-6402801, US6402801 B1, US6402801B1|
|Inventors||Ervin Louis Faulmann, Terry J. Logan|
|Original Assignee||N-Viro International Corp.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (14), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (15), Classifications (18), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/071,205 filed May 1, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,248,148 the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to the field of waste management, and in particular to a method for treating ammonia-containing organic waste, including but not limited to animal manures. Embodiments of the present invention can be applied to destroy pathogens, reduce noxious odors, and immobilize water-soluble pollutants in such organic waste, rendering the treated waste material safe for storage and application to land as, for example, a fertilizer, liming agent or soil amendment.
Since ancient times, animal manures were recycled back to the land that provided the animal feed, thereby completing the nutrient cycle. As animal production became intensified, the cycle was broken, with chemical fertilizers increasingly used to produce animal feed and the animal manure accumulating at the point of production as an unwanted waste. In many parts of the U.S., Europe and other countries, manure production at large, confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), primarily poultry, swine, dairy and beef, has resulted in odor, nutrient runoff and pathogen food-chain contamination problems. Until the present, little attention has been placed on the processing of animal manure to address these problems, with most attention being placed on so-called “best management practices” to contain the manure and ensure that it is applied at agronomic rates. Because of the large concentrations of animal manures at CAFOs, generally well in excess of local needs, the need has arisen to treat manures so that they can be easily stored without causing odor or nutrient leaching problems, to greatly reduce pathogen levels and protect against food-chain contamination, and to create products that have a wide range of utility as fertilizers and soil amendments.
A wide range of technologies were developed to treat wastewater residuals and sewage sludges for pathogen destruction and odor control in response to the large public works expenditures for wastewater treatment in the U.S. in the 1960s and 1970s. Prominent among these were technologies that used alkaline reagents to destroy pathogens, to reduce odors, and to solidify and granulate dewatered sewage sludges to make products that could be used beneficially. The standards that these technologies had to meet were the U.S. EPA regulations for pathogen reductions (see 40 C.F.R. §§257, 503) and vector attractions (40 C.F.R. §503).
A traditional approach to alkaline stabilization of sewage sludges has been the use of lime (CaO) to raise pH to around 12 or to produce heat by exothermic hydrolysis. Alternative technological approaches have involved the use of less expensive alkaline mineral by-products. Patents exemplifying such approaches include U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,002 to Nicholson; U.S. Pat. No. 4,781,842 to Nicholson; U.S. Pat. No. 4,902,431 to Nicholson et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,277,826 to Burns et al. Such patents teach the use of a range of alkaline materials to raise pH to around 12 and to increase total solids as a means of destroying pathogens.
In addition, the use of ammonia to kill pathogens in sewage sludge is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,793,927 to Meehan et al. Meehan describes the addition of ammonia-containing compounds to sewage sludge as an agent to destroy bacterial, parasitic and viral pathogens within the sludge matrix. U.S. Pat. No. 5,143,481 to Schumacher et al. shows how fluidized bed combustion residue (FBCR), or fly ash, containing CaO can be used to treat sewage sludges by producing heat in an exothermic reaction. U.S. Pat. No. 5,679,262 to Girovich et al. describes the use of mineral by-products to reduce the use of CaO in order to kill pathogens and achieve a dry product. Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 5,417,861 to Burnham teaches how a combination of surviving microflora, salt levels and solids content can provide long-term stability to bioorganic or wastewater sludges.
Despite these extensive efforts directed at the treatment of wastewater and sewage sludge, no comparable technologies have been developed for the treatment of ammonia-containing organic waste such as animal manures. Manure treatment, for example, has historically included only aerobic and anaerobic digestion of liquid manures, while some beef and poultry manure is composed (see D. L. Day and T. L. Funk, Processing Manure: Physical, Chemical, and Biological Treatment (1998) (published in J. L. Hatfield and B. A. Stewart, Animal Waste Utilization: Effective Use of Manure as a Soil Resource (Ann Arbor Press 1998)). The only significant known approach to chemical stabilization of manure is the addition of calcium, iron or aluminum salts to poultry manure to reduce ammonia emissions and to immobilize soluble phosphorus (see P. A. Moore, Jr. et al. and D. M. Miller, Reducing Phosphorus Solubility in Poultry Manure with Aluminum, Calcium and Iron Amendments, J. Environ. Qual., vol. 23, 325-330 (1994)); and U.S. Pat. No. 3,877,920 to Carlberg, which taught the use of fly ash to deodorize animal manures. None of these approaches, however, deal with chemical treatment of animal manure for pathogen destruction.
With respect to pathogen destruction in animal manures, M. B. Jenkins et al., Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Ammonia, Appl. and Env. Microbiol., Vol. 64, 784-788 (1998), shows that free ammonia-containing solutions can destroy Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in liquid media and suggests that ammonia in manures might be used to kill oocycsts of this organism, but this reference only discusses the use of free ammonia in solution. Large-scale introduction of aqueous ammonia to animal manures presents a host of practical problems, including, but not limited to, problems associated with the handling of large quantities of a potentially-hazardous liquid. The introduction of liquids to manure is counterproductive because manures are inherently wet and need to be dewatered for effective handling and storage. Moreover, aqueous ammonia is caustic, relatively expensive and difficult to handle.
Another problem with respect to the treatment of manures, especially where the treated material is to be used as a soil amendment, relates to the high levels of water-soluble phosphorous and water-soluble trace elements that are often found in such waste material. For example, the application of manure to land in amounts optimal to satisfy nitrogen requirements for crops can result in a buildup of water-soluble phosphorous in the soil, since crop demands for phosphorous are generally much lower than those for nitrogen. This can lead to undesirable runoff of phosphorous during rainfall events and eutrophication of surface waters like lakes, streams and impoundments. Similarly, high levels of water-soluble trace elements, such as copper and zinc, can be phytotoxic to crops, particularly for acidic soils.
In view of the foregoing, it is apparent that there is a need for safe, effective and economical methods for disinfecting and deodorizing animal manures and other organic wastes that takes advantage of the inherent endogenous ammonia in such waste materials. Moreover, in order to avoid environmental problems often associated with land application of manures, it is desirable that such methods limit the level of water-soluble phosphorous, copper and zinc in the end product.
The present invention is directed to methods for disinfecting and deodorizing animal manures and other organic wastes containing ammonia, while also reducing the levels of water-soluble pollutants such as phosphorous, copper and zinc. In accordance with a particular embodiment, the solids content of a sample of animal manure is raised to an approximate minimum of 30% so as to create air-filled pore space. In addition, the pH of the animal manure is raised to an approximate minimum of 9.5 to liberate endogenous gaseous ammonia in the air-filled pores for at least 1 hour, the level of gaseous ammonia being sufficient to reduce E. coli levels to less than 3.3*102 colony forming units/gram (dry weight) and Salmonella levels to less than 6.7*102 colony forming units/gram (dry weight), and to significantly reduce the levels of viruses and parasites. Subsequent to, or in conjunction with, this pathogen destruction, alkaline material and/or iron salts are added to the waste material to immobilize water-soluble pollutants. Such methods produce a granular, deodorized product suitable for use as a soil amendment.
FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the effect of pH on ammonia gas production.
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a general method for treating ammonia-containing organic waste in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for treating ammonia-containing organic waste in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the effect of fluidized bed coal ash on the level of water-soluble phosphorous in cow manure following disinfection.
FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the effect of ferrous chloride on the level of water-soluble phosphorous in cow manure following disinfection.
The present invention is directed to methods for treating animal manures and other ammonia-containing organic wastes. In accordance with particular embodiments described below, such organic waste is disinfected and deodorized to produce a pasteurized, granular product suitable for use as a soil amendment. In addition, water-soluble pollutants in the organic waste are immobilized. Unlike known approaches, methods in accordance with the present invention take advantage of the superior effectiveness of gaseous ammonia in achieving pathogen kill as compared to aqueous ammonia.
Ammonia gas is a known chemical agent for achieving pathogen kill, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,793,972, issued to Meehan et al. for an invention involving the treatment of sewage sludge in which ammonia was added and the pH was raised to near 12. In addition, the role of ammonia as a disinfectant for Cryptosporidium parvum has been recognized in, for example, M. B. Jenkins et al., Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Ammonia, Appl. and Env. Microbiol., Vol. 64, 784-788 (1998), but such studies only considered free ammonia dissolved in water and did not identify the superior role of gaseous ammonia compared to dissolved ammonia in pathogen kill. In a material that contains solids and water, such as animal manure, and at the normal pH levels of animal manure, any ammonia in the material or added to the material (including as taught by Meehan) would exist as a dissolved gas or as ammonium ion.
Ammonia gas has a high solubility in water, and except at high pH levels exists as the ammonium ion. The equilibrium between dissolved ammonia (NH3(1)) and ammonium ion (NH4 +) is given by the equation:
This equation shows that the amount of dissolved ammonia increases as the pH increases (i.e., the concentration of H+ decreases). To illustrate, FIG. 1 maps the percentage of ammonia as dissolved ammonia as a function of pH, showing that free ammonia (NH3) is produced when pH is greater than about 9.5 and reaches a maximum near pH 12.
In view of the relationship illustrated in FIG. 1, embodiments of the present invention are directed to treatment processes (1) in which pH is raised to a level sufficient to release significant endogenous ammonia from the manure, yet low enough not to release so much ammonia as to cause an odor problem, (2) that minimize the loss of fertilizer nitrogen, and (3) that do not significantly add to ammonia air emissions. Such treatment processes include increasing the solids content of the manure so as to increase the air-filled pore space and to create a reservoir in which gaseous ammonia can be liberated and can contact and kill pathogens in the manure. Increasing the solids content enhances the killing effect of the endogenous ammonia in the manure and reduces the need to raise pH to the very high levels (e.g., near 12) used in previously known waste treatment approaches. By so doing, the odor problems associated with large ammonia releases and the loss of fertilizer nitrogen can be minimized.
FIG. 2 illustrates a general method for treating ammonia-containing organic waste in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Once a collection of organic waste material is obtained (Step 10), the method of this embodiment generally involves creating air-filled pore space within the organic waste material (Step 15). This can be done, for example, by increasing the solids content of the organic waste to at least approximately 30%. A portion of the endogenous ammonia is then converted to gaseous ammonia in the air-filled pore space (Step 20). This can be done, for example, by raising the pH of the organic waste material to a minimum of approximately 9.5.
To illustrate a specific implementation of an embodiment such as that illustrated in FIG. 2, consider a case in which a 5-ton collection of chicken manure (e.g., removed from a poultry house) is to be treated. Such chicken manure typically has a solids content of approximately 20% and a pH of approximately 6.8. Referring now to FIG. 3, once the collection of chicken manure is obtained (Step 25), bulking material is added to the semi-liquid collection of chicken manure using, for example, a mixing device such as an auger-mixer or a front-end loader (Step 30). A wide variety of materials are suitable for use as a bulking material including, for example, fluidized boiler ash (a by-product of industrial air scrubbing processes). The bulking material is added in an amount sufficient to raise the solids content of the collection to approximately 30% or above (Step 35). In this example, approximately 1,400 pounds of fluidized boiler ash is generally sufficient. During the mixing process, it is desirable to monitor the pH of the mixture (Step 40). In some cases, it may be necessary to mix in additional alkaline materials (e.g., lye, lime, or similar material) to achieve the desired pH of approximately 9.5 or above, although the alkaline nature of the bulking material itself may be sufficient. The mixture of manure and bulking material is then placed in an enclosed area (e.g., a bunker), or even simply covered with a tarp, for a period of approximately 1 hour or more to entrain the evolved ammonia (Step 45). At the completion of this incubation period, the mixture can be safely used for spreading on agricultural fields, mixed with other materials for soil blends, and many other similar uses.
The level of gaseous ammonia produced by a method such as those shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 will generally be sufficient to reduce E. coli levels to less than 3.3*102 colony forming units/gram (dry weight) and Salmonella levels to less than 6.7*102 colony forming units/gram (dry weight), and to significantly reduce the levels of viruses and parasites. Moreover, the method produces a product that is granular and deodorized for use as a soil amendment.
All animal manures contain significant quantities of ammonia. Table 1 below summarizes the total ammonia-nitrogen (NH3—N) contents of different types of animal manures. This data indicates that all animal manures will typically contain enough total ammonia to provide gaseous ammonia for disinfection, under the appropriate process parameters of pH, solids and time of treatment, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
Average Ammonia-Nitrogen in Animal Manures
*Assumes no bedding.
Source: Bull, Ohio Livestock Manure and Wastewater Management Guide 604 (Ohio State University 1992).
Ammonia gas has a very high solubility in water (˜32% by weight). This is represented quantitatively by the Henry's Law Constant for ammonia of 5.76×104 mol m−3atm−1. This value is 1700 times greater than that of carbon dioxide and almost 50 times greater than that of sulfur dioxide. Eq. 1 and FIG. 1 show that ammonia can be generated by raising pH above about 9.5, but if the manure is too wet, there will be enough free water to dissolve the ammonia and prevent free contact of ammonia gas with manure pathogens. When a dry mineral material like fly ash, cement kiln dust or lime kiln dust is mixed in sufficient quantities, or the manure is otherwise dried, free water in the manure is absorbed by the solids or otherwise removed, and pore space is created in the mixture. If the solids content of the mixture is high enough, there will be enough air-filled pore space in the mixture for ammonia gas to be liberated within the material when the pH is raised. Converting free ammonia from the dissolved to the gaseous form increases the effectiveness of the endogenous ammonia in the manure in killing pathogens. Fly ash addition increases solids content, total porosity and air-filled porosity, thereby increasing the amount of gaseous ammonia in the manure. If an alkaline material is used that generates heat through exothermic hydrolysis with water in the manure, a lower solids content and pH may be acceptable to achieve the same level of gaseous ammonia in the air-filled pore space.
The following examples illustrate the effectiveness of organic waste treatment methods in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In a first example, increasing the pH of sterile chicken manure, seeded with E. coli and Salmonella, by the addition of NaOH, led to an increased evolution of ammonia gas into the headspace and a decrease in the survival of the seeded bacteria. This bactericidal effect was enhanced when the chicken manure contained less water (i.e., more solids). Initial reaction mixtures of 20 grams of sterile chicken manure, seeded with overnight cultures of E. coli and Salmonella, were adjusted to 30% solids or 15% solids with the addition of either 5 M NaOH and water (pH 9.5 reactions) or sterile water alone (pH<8.5 reactions). The reaction mixtures were mixed extensively and split into 5 gram (30% solids) or 10 gram (15% solids) aliquots. The reaction tubes were then placed in a 30° C. incubator, tested for pH by electrode or placed in a 250 ml chamber for ammonia headspace analysis with ammonia-specific pull tubes. Tubes were removed from the incubator after 1 and 3 hours incubation and assayed for surviving E. coli (growth on E. coli Petrifilm (3M, Minneapolis, Minn.)) and Salmonella (black colony growth on XLD agar plates). The results are presented in Table 2.
Effect of pH and % Solids on Survival of Seeded E. coli
and Salmonella in Chicken Manure
Bacterial CFU*/gram (dry weight)
1 Hour Incubation
3 Hours Incubation
Chicken Manure -
Chicken Manure -
Chicken Manure -
Chicken Manure -
*Colony Forming Units
In a second example, increasing the pH of sterile swine manure, seeded with E. coli and Salmonella, by the addition of NaOH, led to an increased evolution of ammonia into the headspace and a decrease in the survival of the seeded bacteria. This bactericidal effect was enhanced when the swine manure contained less water (i.e., more solids). Initial reaction mixtures of 23.5 grams of sterile swine manure, seeded with overnight cultures of E. coli and Salmonella, were adjusted to 30% solids or 15% solids with the addition of either 5 M NaOH and water (pH 9.5 reactions) or sterile water alone (pH 8.8 reactions). The reaction mixtures were mixed extensively and split into 5 gram (30% solids) or 10 gram (15% solids) aliquots. The reaction tubes were then placed in a 30° C. incubator, tested for pH by electrode or placed in a 250 ml chamber for ammonia headspace analysis with ammonia-specific pull tubes. Tubes were removed from the incubator after 1 and 3 hours incubation and assayed for surviving E. coli (growth on E. coli Petrifilm (3M, Minneapolis, Minn.) and Salmonella (black colony growth on XLD agar plates). The results are presented in Table 3.
Effect of pH and % Survival on the Survival of seeded
E. coli and Salmonella in Swine Manure
Bacterial CFU*/gram (dry weight)
1 Hour Incubation
3 Hours Incubation
Swine Manure -
Swine Manure -
Swine Manure -
Swine Manure -
*Colony Forming Units
These examples show that the three process variables used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention—pH, solids and time—have a synergistic effect promoting the destruction of E. coli and Salmonella in animal manures to non-detectable levels. The total content of the manure does not change during processing, only the form of the ammonia and the contact between gaseous ammonia and pathogens in the manure. At the lower pH, increasing the solids content had little effect on destruction of E. coli and Salmonella after one hour. When pH was raised to near 9.5, there was measurable pathogen destruction. However, substantially complete destruction of E. coli and Salmonella only occurred when pH was raised to near 9.5 and solids content was raised to 30%. In the case of the swine manure, because of the lower endogenous ammonia than in chicken manure, a three hour process time was required to reduce E. coli to non-detectable levels. These results also show a strong association between gaseous endogenous ammonia and pathogen destruction. This process for pathogen destruction should be applicable to all ammonia-containing organic wastes.
In accordance with a variation on the above-described embodiments, levels of water-soluble pollutants, such as phosphorous and trace metals, can be reduced by the addition of alkaline material byproducts (e.g., mineral byproducts) and/or iron salts subsequent to, or in conjunction with, pathogen destruction obtained by liberation of gaseous ammonia from the organic waste. By combining pathogen destruction with phosphorous and trace element immobilization, such embodiments can be applied to produce a soil amendment that avoids many of the limitations of known approaches to handling animal manures and other organic wastes by helping to avoid transferring pathogens, phosphorous and trace elements to the food chain and water supplies.
For example, referring back to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, immobilization of water-soluble pollutants can be achieved through the introduction of a suitable quantity (see below) of an iron salt to the organic waste material following the conversion of endogenous ammonia to gaseous ammonia in Step 20. Iron salts that have been found to be effective include ferrous chloride (FeCl2), ferric chloride (FeCl3), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) and ferric sulfate (Fe2(SO4)3). With reference to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, the quantity of iron salt can be mixed into the organic waste material following entrainment of the evolved ammonia in Step 45.
Alkaline materials, such as mineral byproducts, have also been found effective in immobilizing water-soluble pollutants. Such materials can be introduced in suitable quantity (see below) in the same manner as just described with respect to the use of iron salts. Materials useful for such applications include fluidized bed coal ash, fly ash, coal combustion ash, flue gas desulferization byproduct, cement kiln dust, wood ash, pulverized limestone, rock fines, spent water treatment lime, and gypsum. It is also possible to reduce the quantity of iron salts required to achieve a desired level of immobilization for certain pollutants by using a combination of alkaline materials and iron salts.
The following examples, the results of which are respectively presented in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5, illustrate the effectiveness of organic waste treatments methods in accordance with the above-described embodiments for immobilization of water-soluble pollutants. In each case, cow manure was first reacted with NaOH to raise the pH to 10.5 for pathogen reduction. Following a two-hour reaction time, respective samples of treated manure, having a solids content of approximately 30%, was amended with fluidized bed coal ash (FBC) or ferrous chloride (FeCl2) at dose rates of 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% by weight for FBC; and 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0% and 4.0% by weight for FeCl2. The materials were reacted for periods of up to 7 days, after which the treated manures were extracted with water for one hour at a solid-to-water ration of 1:10 on a rotary shaker. The levels of water-soluble phosphorous (P) were then determined by standard methods (the results are presented as a percent reduction in water-soluble P relative to the untreated manure, and were corrected for dilution by the additives).
As shown in FIG. 4, additions of 30-50% FBC initially reduced water-soluble P by greater than 75%, which reductions declined over 7 days to less than 50%. FIG. 5 shows that additions of 2-4% FeCl2 initially reduced water-soluble P by greater than 80%, which reductions were maintained after 7 days.
Combinations of FBC and FeCl2 are also effective in reducing levels of water-soluble P. For example, using a methodology identical to that described above with respect to FIGS. 4 and 5, samples of 20% and 30% by weight FBC and 2% and 4% by weight FeCl2 were added alone and in combination, and the treated manure was tested at 2, 4 and 8 days. As illustrated in Table 4 below, FBC alone reduced water-soluble P by 50%, regardless of the dose rate. FeCl2 at 2% and 4% by weight reduced water-soluble P by 80% and 99% respectively, and solubility did not change between 2 and 8 days. Combining FBC and FeCl2 enhanced the effect of the FeCl2 at the 2% dose rate, but only slightly. FBC had no effect at the 4% FeCl2 dose rate because the reduction in water-soluble P was already 99% with the FeCl2 alone.
Immobilization of Water-Soluble Phosphorous in
Cow Manure with FBC, FeCl2, and Combinations Thereof
20% FBC and 2% FeCl2
20% FBC and 4% FeCl2
30% FBC and 2% FeCl2
30% FBC and 4% FeCl2
FBC, FeCl2, and combinations of the two are also effective in reducing the levels of water-soluble trace elements (e.g., copper (Cu), zinc (Zn)) from organic waste. Such reductions are especially advantageous when treating animal manures, since Cu and Zn are often added to animal feed and can occur in high enough levels in animal manure to produce crop phytotoxicity when the manure is used as a soil amendment.
In one example, FBC and FeCl2 were added to alkaline-treated cow manure and water extracts were made as previously described with respect to the reduction of water-soluble phosphorous levels. Cu and Zn levels in the water extracts were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy, using standard methods. FBC was amended at rates of 20% and 30% by weight, FeCl2 was amended at a single rate of 2% by weight, and a combination of 30% FBC and 2% FeCl2 by weight was also evaluated.
As shown in Table 5 below, FeCl2 at a dose rate of 2% by weight decreased water-soluble Cu from 175-225 parts per billion (ppb) in the untreated manure to 50-75 ppb. FBC, whether or alone or in combination with FeCl2, had no appreciable effect in reducing levels of water-soluble Cu. On the other hand, both FBC and FeCl2 decreased levels of water-soluble Zn compared to the untreated manure. As with Cu, the combination of FBC and FeCl2 was not superior to FeCl2 alone.
Immobilization of Water-Soluble Copper and Zinc in
Cow Manure with FBC, FeCl2, and Combinations Thereof
30% FBC + 2% FeCl2
The variations discussed above for reducing levels of water-soluble phosphorous and trace elements can be implemented, for example, generally in accordance with the basic embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3. For example, the process can be sequenced such that after the pathogen destruction step is substantially completed, a quantity of FeCl2 (or other iron salt) is added to immobilize P, Cu and Zn.
Persons skilled in the art of waste management will recognize that waste treatment methods in accordance with embodiments of the present invention provide significant advantages over known processes that use higher pH. Among these advantages are limiting ammonia release, thereby limiting hazards to workers from airborne ammonia, and keeping residual ammonia with the end product, thereby maintaining the fertilizer value of the end product. In addition, application of methods in accordance with such embodiments makes it easier to reduce the pH of the end product after processing, thereby enhancing its utility in land applications for soils that are already alkaline.
Although the present invention has been described principally with reference to embodiments for treating animal manures, persons skilled in the art will recognize that it is equally applicable to other types of ammonia-containing animal wastes. For example, embodiments of the present invention may similarly be used to treat municipal wastewater sewage sludge, paunch manure, brewery sludge, and fermentation biomass wastes. Indeed, virtually any ammonia-containing organic waste material is amenable to beneficial treatment in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
The foregoing is a detailed description of particular embodiments of the present invention. The invention embraces all alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the letter and spirit of the claims, as well as all equivalents of the claimed subject matter. For example, manures with high initial solids content (e.g., poultry or beef cattle manure) may be treated by adding enough lime or caustic soda to raise the pH, while fly ash may be added to wetter manure (e.g., swine manure) to achieve the required solids content and pH. Likewise, a mixture of non-alkaline fly ash or other dry materials can be added to raise the solids content, and lime or caustic soda added to raise the pH. Mixing of the manure with the alkaline reagents may be accomplished with a variety of mixers (e.g., cement mixers, sewage sludge alkaline stabilization mixers, topsoil blenders), and the mixture may be held in a variety of enclosed vessels (e.g., plastic-covered windrows, silos, bunkers), depending on the scale of a particular operation. Persons skilled in the art will recognize from the foregoing detailed description that many other alternatives, modifications and variations are possible.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3877920||Jan 31, 1973||Apr 15, 1975||George Carlberg||Method of reclaiming wastes and products therefrom|
|US4554002||May 16, 1983||Nov 19, 1985||N-Viro Energy Systems Ltd.||Beneficiating waste sludges for agricultural use and product made thereby|
|US4781842||Feb 27, 1987||Nov 1, 1988||N-Viro Energy Systems Ltd.||Method of treating wastewater sludge|
|US4793927||Jan 27, 1987||Dec 27, 1988||Tulane Medical Center Of Tulane Univ.||Method of treating sewage|
|US4902431||Jan 28, 1988||Feb 20, 1990||N-Viro Energy Systems Ltd.||Method for treating wastewater sludge|
|US4997572||Jun 29, 1990||Mar 5, 1991||Willow Technology, Inc.||High rate method for alkaline stabilization, beneficiating and pelletizing of wastewater treatment plant sludges|
|US5143481||Apr 18, 1991||Sep 1, 1992||American Fly Ash Company||Method of treating municipal sewage sludge and product produced thereby|
|US5277826||Nov 1, 1991||Jan 11, 1994||Browning Ferris Industries||Lime and fly ash stabilization of wastewater treatment sludge|
|US5417861||Dec 21, 1993||May 23, 1995||N-Viro International Corporation||Process to stabilize bioorganic, raw or treated wastewater sludge|
|US5679262||Feb 13, 1995||Oct 21, 1997||Bio Gro Systems, Inc.||Method for alkaline treatment of sewage sludge for beneficial use|
|DE4444032A||Title not available|
|JPS631500A *||Title not available|
|JPS5397253A *||Title not available|
|JPS5824396A *||Title not available|
|1||D.L. Day and T.L. Funk, Processing Manure: Physical, Chemical and Biological Treatment, printed in Animal Waste Utilization: Effective Use of Manure as a Soil Resource, 243-79 (Ann Arbor Press 1998).|
|2||Michael B. Jenkins et al., Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Ammonia, 64 App. and Env. Microbiol., 784-88 (1998).|
|3||P.A. Moore, Jr. and D.M. Miller, Reducing Phosphorous Solubility in Poultry Manure with Aluminum, Calcium and Iron Amendments, 23 J. Environ. Qual. 325-30 (1994).|
|4||P.A. Moore, Jr. et al., Evaluation of Chemical Amendments to Reduce Ammonia Volatilization from Poultry Litter, 75 Poultry Sci. 315-20 (1996).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6742478||Dec 18, 2002||Jun 1, 2004||Union Gypsum, Inc.||Absorbent animal bedding material and method of manufacturing and using same|
|US6752848||Aug 8, 2001||Jun 22, 2004||N-Viro International Corporation||Method for disinfecting and stabilizing organic wastes with mineral by-products|
|US6752849||Nov 19, 2002||Jun 22, 2004||N-Viro International Corporation||Method for disinfecting and stabilizing organic wastes with mineral by-products|
|US7963252 *||Jun 15, 2006||Jun 21, 2011||Microganics, Llc||Composition to accelerate the exponential growth of lag phase-preserved heterotrophic bacteria|
|US8230811 *||May 2, 2007||Jul 31, 2012||Uni-Charm Corporation||Animal litter|
|US8453604||Nov 7, 2011||Jun 4, 2013||Uni-Charm Corporation||Animal litter|
|US20060042319 *||Nov 6, 2003||Mar 2, 2006||Rockwool International A/S||Method for preparing a mineral melt|
|US20060106493 *||Dec 12, 2005||May 18, 2006||Intuitive Surgical Inc.||Camera referenced control in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus|
|US20070014750 *||Jun 15, 2006||Jan 18, 2007||Gourley Ronald J||Composition to accelerate the exponential growth of lag phase-preserved heterotrophic bacteria|
|US20070020222 *||Jul 28, 2006||Jan 25, 2007||General Chemical Performance Products Llc||Environmental control of confined animal rearing facilities with liquid iron compounds|
|US20070184394 *||Feb 5, 2007||Aug 9, 2007||Comrie Douglas C||Production of cementitious ash products with reduced carbon emissions|
|US20090211532 *||May 2, 2007||Aug 27, 2009||Takayuki Matsuo||Animal litter|
|US20110044927 *||Aug 26, 2005||Feb 24, 2011||Aceto Corporation||Odor abatement of organic waste|
|WO2004069770A1 *||Feb 3, 2004||Aug 19, 2004||Michael Macdonald||Method of obtaining a fertilizer|
|WO2006026723A2 *||Aug 26, 2005||Mar 9, 2006||Aceto Corp||Odor abatement of organic waste|
|U.S. Classification||71/11, 210/903, 210/611, 71/12, 210/610, 71/21, 71/15|
|International Classification||C05D3/02, C05F3/00, C05D3/00|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02P20/145, Y10S210/903, C05F3/00, C05D3/00, C05D3/02|
|European Classification||C05D3/00, C05F3/00, C05D3/02|
|Nov 13, 2000||AS||Assignment|
|Dec 12, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 18, 2010||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jun 11, 2010||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Aug 3, 2010||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20100611