|Publication number||US5234606 A|
|Application number||US 07/771,973|
|Publication date||10 Aug 1993|
|Filing date||9 Oct 1991|
|Priority date||9 Oct 1991|
|Publication number||07771973, 771973, US 5234606 A, US 5234606A, US-A-5234606, US5234606 A, US5234606A|
|Inventors||Masahiro Kazama, Masahiro Sano, Seiji Takayama|
|Original Assignee||Nec Environment Engineering Ltd.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (30), Classifications (22), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the method and system for recovering polluted water, especially for treating ground water and industrial wastewater polluted by organic chlorine compounds.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In case ground water is used as industrial water, etc., it can not be used without being treated if it is polluted. Although there are many causes of polluting ground water, recently pollution of ground water with organic chlorine compounds due to percolation of industrial wastewater into soil is often reported.
As conventional methods for treating organic chlorine compounds e.g. trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, contained in ground water, etc., there are evapotranspiration-adsorption process (combination of heated aeration and activated carbon adsorption) and oxidation decomposition process in which potassium permanganate and Fenton's reagent are added into the water. But the most commonly employed method in these days is the evapotranspiration-adsorption process which is a combined method of heated aeration and activated carbon adsorption.
However, in heated aeration and activated carbon adsorption methods, which form the evapotranspiration-adsorption process, activated carbon gets wet due to water vapor generated in the aeration, resulting in considerable capacity reduction of activated carbon for adsorbing organic chlorine compounds. As a result, an amount of the compounds, which are not adsorbed by activated carbon and thus released into the atmosphere, will increase. The released compounds will percolate again into soil. Also, since the saturated activated carbon must be disposed of, an extra cost for disposing the activated carbon is required. In addition, there are other problems including clogging of piping, heat exchanger and diffuser pipe caused by propagation of bacteria in the section where ground water is transferred, heated and aerated. On the other hand, in the oxidation decomposition process using potassium permanganate and Fenton's reagent, etc., consumption of reagent is large, and after-treatment of the treated water is required because the pollutant load is increased due to the use of the reagent and also because heavy metals are contained in the reagent.
An object of the invention is to provide the method for effectively recovering polluted water, especially polluted ground water and industrial wastewater.
Another object of the invention is to provide the method for recovering water polluted by organic chlorine compounds.
A further object of the invention is to provide the method for recovering polluted water by effectively removing bacteria, suspended solid and organic chlorine compounds from water.
A still further object of the invention is to provide the method for recovering polluted water only by addition of oxidizing agent into polluted water followed by ultraviolet rays irradiation and also by reduction of residual oxidizing agent as after-treatment.
A still further object of the invention is to provide the method for recovering polluted water by adequately controlling pH and temperature of raw water.
A still further object of the invention is to provide the system for implementing the methods mentioned above.
Further objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the invention.
Recovery of polluted water based on the invention is achieved by carrying out disinfection, removal of suspended solid, decomposition of organic chlorine compounds and treatment of residual oxidizing agent in its order. In addition, after the removal of suspended solid, pH and temperature of raw water is adjusted prior to decomposition of organic chlorine compounds. The system for carrying out the above-mentioned processes is formed of a disinfection unit, a filter, an UV-oxidation-decomposition unit and a reduction unit, and also pH and temperature adjustment units are used, as required.
FIG. 1 shows a system based on the invention.
FIGS. 2 and 3 indicate relation between trichloroethylene concentration and ultraviolet rays irradiation amount.
FIG. 4 indicates relation between pH and residual trichloroethylene concentration for the same amount of ultraviolet rays irradiation.
FIG. 5 indicates relation between trichloroethylene concentration and ultraviolet rays irradiation amount for various raw water temperatures.
The first process, conducted in accordance with the invention, is a disinfection process. In the process, bacteria, which propagates due to various organic materials contained in polluted ground water, etc., is disinfected by oxidizing agent such as hydrogen peroxide and ozone. As a result of this, clogging of flowmeter, filter and piping used in the treatment system can be prevented. Oxidizing agents used in this process are not necessarily limited to special types, but should preferably satisfy such requirements as strong bactericidal action, high ultraviolet rays absorption capacity, easy after-treatment and having no corrosiveness on piping. Ozone is almost insoluble in water and thus inefficient in disinfection. Further, ozone, which has not been dissolved in water, causes offensive smell. By contrast, hydrogen peroxide can be easily handled, and residual hydrogen peroxide in water can be easily decomposed into water and oxygen by using ultraviolet rays, reducing agent and activated carbon. As to the amount of oxidizing agent to be added to the water, it is determined by taking into account both the disinfection effect and the amount required for decomposing organic materials conducted in the organic chlorine compound decomposing process in the 5th process.
In the 2nd process, suspended material is removed from the water by either filtration or sedimentation.
In the 3rd process, pH of the water treated in the 1st and 2nd processes is adjusted to 9 or below--preferably between 3 and 9.
In the 4th process, temperature of the water treated in the 3rd process is adjusted to fall within a range of 15° to 30° C.
The 3rd and 4th processes are the precesses required depending upon the condition of the water. Therefore, if the water satisfies the above-mentioned requirements, they are not necessary.
In the 5th process, organic chlorine compounds are oxidation-decomposed by irradiating ultraviolet rays on residual oxidizing agent remaining in the water treated in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th processes. In the oxidation decomposition reaction, the organic chlorine compounds are oxidation-decomposed by active oxygen generated by irradiating ultraviolet rays on the residual oxidizing agent. As a result of the oxidation-decomposition reaction, water, carbon dioxide and trace hydrochloric acid are generated. If necessary, the hydrochloric acid is then adsorbed by weak ion exchange resin. As UV lamp, either high pressure or low pressure mercury lamps may be used, but if hydrogen peroxide is used as oxidizing agent, a low pressure mercury lamp is advantageous because it irradiates ultraviolet rays with a main wave length of 253.7 nm which can efficiently decompose the oxidizing agent.
In the 6th process, the residual oxidizing agent carried over from the 5th process is reduced by using reducing agent, activated carbon or catalyst resin. For example, in case of hydrogen peroxide, it is reduced to oxygen and water. While, in case of ozone, it is reduced to oxygen.
Further, in the 5th process, when an organic chlorine compound is oxidation-decomposed, hydrochloric acid is formed. Especially, in case the concentration of the compound is high, pH of the water will drop considerably. In this case, the oxidation decomposition is carried out by adjusting pH of the water by adding alkali to the water in the 5th process or between the 5th and 6th processes. As alkali to be used for this purpose, any alkali among potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate may be used. However, sodium hydroxide can be most easily handled in operation.
Compared with the conventional methods, in the treatment method based on the invention, organic chlorine compounds in polluted water can be easily treated, and also propagation of bacteria, which results in the clogging of piping can be avoided.
Moreover, the UV-oxidation-decomposition can be effectively carried out by adjusting both pH and temperature of water to 9 or below and to a range of 15° to 30° C. respectively prior to the UV-oxidation-decomposition process in the fifth process.
The examples of the invention are explained herein through the treatment tests of the wastewater containing trichloroethylene. The treatment tests were performed using the test equipment depicted in FIG. 1. Table 1 indicates the specification for the equipment.
TABLE 1______________________________________Specification of test equipmentProcess Unit Specification______________________________________1st Disinfection 30% hydrogen peroxide2nd Filtration 10μ cartridge filter3rd pH adjusting 2% sodium hydroxide 10% sulfuric acid4th Temp. adjusting Heat exchanger5th UV oxidation Capacity: 3.2 liters degradation Material: Stainless steel Jacket material: Quartz Type of lamp: Low pressure mercury lamp Capacity: 30W6th Reduction 10% sodium hydrogen sulfite pH adjustment 2% sodium hydroxide______________________________________
Guaranteed reagent of trichloroethylene was initially dissolved in pure water in a measuring flask and put into tank 1, and then diluted with pure water until the volume of the diluted solution reaches 20 liters. The solution had a trichloroethylene concentration ranging from 5.0 to 0.05 mg/l and had 100 pcs/ml of live microorganism, and was used as a test solution.
Using pump 2, the test solution was passed through cartridge filter 3 and stored in tank 4. At the same time, hydrogen peroxide was supplied from hydrogen peroxide storage tank 9 to tank 1 by pump 10. The hydrogen peroxide concentration in tank 4 was adjusted to approx. 300 mg/l.
The hydrogen peroxide-containing test solution stored in tank 4 was transferred by pump 5, via flowmeter 6 and heat exchanger 15, to UV-oxidation-decomposition unit 7 where trichloroethylene is oxidation-decomposed. FIGS. 2 and 3 show the measurement results for trichloroethylene at initial concentrations of 5.0 mg/l and 0.05 mg/l respectively.
In either of both tests, residual hydrogen peroxide in the test solution was reduced by sodium hydrogen sulfite which had been supplied from sodium hydrogen sulfite storage tank 11 to tank 8 by pump 12. At the same time, sodium hydroxide was supplied to tank 8 to adjust pH of the test solution lowered due to the oxidation decomposition. Sodium hydroxide was supplied from sodium hydroxide storage tank 13 to tank 8 by pump 14.
As to disinfection which is one of the effects expected by applying the invention, the disinfection effect by hydrogen peroxide could be confirmed from the measurement results (0 pc/ml) of live microorganism in the test solution sampled from tank 4. In addition to the above mentioned tests carried out with hydrogen peroxide concentration adjusted to 300 mg/l, the same tests were conducted with hydrogen peroxide concentration adjusted to 1000 mg/l, 500 mg/l and 100 mg/l, and no live microorganism was found in any of the four test results.
The results of the trichloroethylene decomposition tests were shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. The target value of the trichloroethylene concentration in the treated water was set at 0.03 mg/l or less which is the provisional standard value for city water (established by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan on Feb. 18, 1984). FIG. 2 shows the change of trichloroethylene concentration in the water with respect to the quantity of UV irradiation (kw.h/m3), which indicates the results of tests in which trichloroethylene was decomposed by UV+H2 O2 precess (based on the invention). That is, when the quantity of UV irradiation is 0.18 kw.h/m3, the trichloroethylene concentration in the treated water becomes 0.5 mg/l. As the quantity of UV irradiation increases to 0.37, 0.77, 1.35 and 2.03 kw.h/m3, the trichloroethylene concentration decreases to 0.04, 0.01, 0.004 and 0.003 mg/l. From the results described above, it can be noticed that the treatment method based on the invention is effective when the quantity of UV irradiation is approx. 0.4 kw.h/m3 or above. FIG. 3 shows the results of the tests conducted with an initial trichloroethylene of 0.05 mg/l. From the results showing that the trichloroethylene concentration after being treated by UV irradiation of 0.2 kw.h/m3 or above was 0.03 mg/l or less, it is clear that the invention is effective. Especially, when the water was treated by UV irradiation of 0.77 kw.h/m3 or above, the trichloroethylene concentration fell down to below 0.001 mg/l.
For the application examples mentioned above, explanations were given only to the cases where the initial trichloroethylene concentrations was 5.0 mg/l and 0.05 mg/l. However, even if the initial trichloroethylene concentration was 5.0 mg/l or above or 0.05 mg/l or below, the trichloroethylene concentration in the treated water could be easily reduced to the target value of 0.03 mg/l or less.
Furthermore, as organic chlorine compounds contained in raw water, besides trichloroethylene, there are tetrachloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and the pollution of ground water by the compounds is becoming a serious problem. Therefore, decomposition tests were conducted using the water containing 1.0-100 mg/l of tetrachloroethylene and 1.0-100 mg/l of 1,1,1-trichloroethane as raw water, in the same manner and under the same conditions as in the above mentioned case of trichloroethylene. From the test results, it was confirmed that the concentrations of the compound(tetrachloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane) in the treated water could be reduced down to 0.01 mg/l and 0.3 mg/l respectively. The target values of the concentrations of tetrachloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane in the treated water were set at the provisional standard values of city water (established by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan on Feb. 18, 1984.).
Furthermore, the effectiveness of both the pH adjusting process in the 3rd process and the temperature adjusting process in the 4th process is described below.
In tank 4 containing the water with 10 mg/l of trichloroethylene, pH of the water was adjusted to 3, 5.3, 8, 9, 10 by adding sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid from sodium hydroxide storage tank 13 and sulfuric acid storage tank 16 respectively to tank 4. The chemicals were added to the solution in tank 4 so that the hydrogen peroxide concentration became 250 mg/l. Then, oxidation decomposition was carried out by means of UV-oxidation-decomposition unit 7. FIG. 4 shows the measurement results of the residual trichloroethylene concentration in case where the quantity of UV irradiation was 0.77 kw.h/m3. When pH of the water was 3, 5.3, 8, 9, the residual trichloroethylene concentration in the treated water became 0.003, 0.005, 0.004, 0.006 mg/l respectively. On the other hand, when pH was 10, the residual trichloroethylene concentration became 0.14 mg/l, which proves the effectiveness of the invention.
In addition, different tests were conducted with trichloroethylene concentration adjusted to 10 mg/l and hydrogen peroxide concentration to 220 mg/l respectively in tank 4. As test 1, the water in tank 4 was passed through flowmeter 6 (at a flowrate of 0.6 l/min) and heat exchanger 15 to adjust the water temperature to 10° C., and then directed to UV-oxidation-decomposition unit 7. Other tests were also carried out with the water temperature at the heat exchanger outlet adjusted to 15°, 22°, 30° and 38° C. as tests 2, 3, 4 and 5. As shown in FIG. 5, when the quantity of UV irradiation was 0.77 kw.h/m3, the residual trichloroethylene concentration in the treated water became 0.09 mg/l in test 1, 0.007 mg/l in test 2(water temperature: 15° C.), 0.005 mg/l in test 3(water temperature: 22° C.), 0.006 mg/l in test 4(water temperature: 30° C.), 0.03 mg/l in test 5(water temperature: 38° C.). From the test results, it is clear that the water temperature between 15° to 30° C. is effective in the oxidation decomposition.
In the application examples mentioned above, the tests were performed with an initial trichloroethylene concentration set at 10 mg/l in tank 4. However, it has been confirmed that the oxidation decomposition under the above mentioned conditions can be efficiently carried out at either higher and lower concentrations. Needless to say, if pH of the water is 9 or below and the temperature of the water is within a range of 15° to 30° C. in tank 4, the pH adjusting unit in the 3rd process and the temperature adjusting unit in the 4th process may be naturally omitted.
In the treatment method based on the invention, in which the disinfection of bacteria and the decomposition of organic chlorine compounds occur by irradiating ultraviolet rays on the polluted water after the addition of oxidizing agent to the water, polluted water can be effectively and economically treated because only the reduction treatment of oxidizing agent is required as the after-treatment of the treated water. In addition, since bacteria can be disinfected by the addition of oxidizing agent, clogging of piping, heat exchangers, etc. can be prevented only by installing the suspended material removing process such as filtration and sedimentation, which enables the system to treat and makes an effective use of a large amount of polluted water including ground water.
Further, it is important for effective oxidation decomposition to adjust pH of the water to 9 or below--preferably between 3 to 9, and to adjust the temperature of the water within a range of 15° to 30° C. at the inlet of the UV-oxidation-decomposition unit.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3660277 *||17 May 1971||2 May 1972||Union Carbide Corp||Oxygenation-ozonation of bod-containing water|
|US3772188 *||28 Feb 1972||13 Nov 1973||R Edwards||Sewage treatment apparatus and method|
|US3870033 *||30 Nov 1973||11 Mar 1975||Aqua Media||Ultra pure water process and apparatus|
|US4012321 *||25 Mar 1975||15 Mar 1977||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Oxidation of refractory organics in aqueous waste streams by hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet light|
|US4218315 *||11 Sep 1978||19 Aug 1980||Hartkorn Karl Heinz||Oxidation and adsorption method for removing contaminating substances from liquids|
|US4280912 *||5 Nov 1979||28 Jul 1981||Darco Water Systems, Inc.||Water purification unit and method|
|US4548716 *||25 Jul 1984||22 Oct 1985||Lucas Boeve||Method of producing ultrapure, pyrogen-free water|
|US4563286 *||6 Dec 1984||7 Jan 1986||Johnson Dennis E J||System of ionized oxygen allotrope gas water purification and method and apparatus therefor|
|US4849114 *||4 Mar 1988||18 Jul 1989||Ultrox International||Oxidation of toxic compounds in water|
|US4913827 *||27 Jun 1988||3 Apr 1990||Pci Inc.||Process for purifying and de-pyrogenating water|
|US5043080 *||26 Feb 1990||27 Aug 1991||Solarchem Enterprises Inc.||Treating contaminated effluents and groundwaters|
|US5180499 *||17 Oct 1990||19 Jan 1993||Envirozone Technologies, Inc.||Process for removal of solid, chemical and bacterial waste from water|
|WO1990014312A2 *||23 May 1990||29 Nov 1990||Eco Purification Syst||Process and apparatus for the purification of contaminated water by activated ozone|
|1||Chemical Engineering Magazine Jan. 1982, "Ultraviolet Light Takes on CPI Role" by Legan.|
|2||*||Chemical Engineering Magazine Jan. 1982, Ultraviolet Light Takes on CPI Role by Legan.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5468350 *||15 Jul 1993||21 Nov 1995||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus for manufacturing ultrapure water|
|US5478481 *||11 Apr 1994||26 Dec 1995||Nec Environment Engineering Ltd.||Method of treating water containing organic chlorine compounds|
|US5540847 *||26 Jul 1994||30 Jul 1996||Stultz; Jeffrey H.||Sludge digestion|
|US5541947 *||10 May 1995||30 Jul 1996||The Regents Of The University Of Michigan||Selectively triggered, high contrast laser|
|US5545316 *||16 Jun 1995||13 Aug 1996||Nec Environment Engineering Ltd.||Apparatus for treating water containing organic chlorine compounds|
|US5554204 *||28 Jul 1994||10 Sep 1996||Toshiba Ceramics Co., Ltd.||Surface treatment method for quartz material|
|US5582741 *||6 Sep 1994||10 Dec 1996||Nec Environment Engineering Ltd.||Method for treating polluted water|
|US5626745 *||1 Dec 1995||6 May 1997||Water Recycling Systems, Inc.||Waste water purification system|
|US5637231 *||7 Jun 1995||10 Jun 1997||Huron Valley Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for using ozone in a pressure vessel to treat stream of pollutants|
|US5641401 *||5 Jun 1995||24 Jun 1997||The Dow Chemical Company||Sludge deodorization|
|US5711887 *||31 Jul 1995||27 Jan 1998||Global Water Industries, Inc.||Water purification system|
|US5728305 *||19 Dec 1996||17 Mar 1998||Water Recycling Systems, Inc.||Waste water purification system|
|US5804081 *||18 Jun 1997||8 Sep 1998||Radian International Llc||Wastewater treatment|
|US5871620 *||30 Jun 1997||16 Feb 1999||Andrea Egner||Process and device for reducing the nitrate content of water|
|US5997812||1 Aug 1996||7 Dec 1999||Coolant Treatment Systems, L.L.C.||Methods and apparatus for the application of combined fields to disinfect fluids|
|US6083387 *||20 Jun 1996||4 Jul 2000||Burnham Technologies Ltd.||Apparatus for the disinfection of fluids|
|US6090296 *||17 Mar 1999||18 Jul 2000||Oster; Stephen P.||Method and apparatus for UV-oxidation of toxics in water and UV-disinfection of water|
|US6328896||24 Apr 1998||11 Dec 2001||United States Filter Corporation||Process for removing strong oxidizing agents from liquids|
|US6398965||31 Mar 1998||4 Jun 2002||United States Filter Corporation||Water treatment system and process|
|US6464875||21 Apr 2000||15 Oct 2002||Gold Kist, Inc.||Food, animal, vegetable and food preparation byproduct treatment apparatus and process|
|US6565803||27 Apr 1999||20 May 2003||Calgon Carbon Corporation||Method for the inactivation of cryptosporidium parvum using ultraviolet light|
|US6902678||30 Sep 2003||7 Jun 2005||Gary A. Tipton||Bilge water reclamation system and process|
|DE19530086A1 *||16 Aug 1995||20 Feb 1997||Robert Prof Dr Fleischmann||Treatment of surface or waste water|
|DE19530086C2 *||16 Aug 1995||20 Aug 1998||Robert Prof Dr Fleischmann||Verfahren zur physikalisch-chemischen Brauchwasseraufbereitung von Oberflächen- und Abwässern|
|DE112011104418T5||15 Dec 2011||19 Sep 2013||Arkema France||Verfahren und Vorrichtung für die Wasserdesinfektion|
|EP0671363A2 *||8 Sep 1994||13 Sep 1995||Nec Environment Engineering, Ltd.||Method and system for treating polluted water|
|EP0696552A1 *||24 Jul 1995||14 Feb 1996||Kodak-Pathe||Process for treating photographic effluents using ultraviolet and hydrogen peroxide|
|WO1999055622A1 *||15 Apr 1999||4 Nov 1999||United States Filter Corp||Apparatus and process for removing strong oxidizing agents from liquids|
|WO2010034519A2 *||28 Sep 2009||1 Apr 2010||Lonza Inc||Synergistic peroxide based biocidal compositions|
|WO2012080673A1||15 Dec 2011||21 Jun 2012||Arkema France||Method and device for disinfecting water|
|U.S. Classification||210/748.11, 210/908, 422/24, 210/766, 422/30, 210/760, 210/757, 210/759, 210/764|
|International Classification||C02F1/70, C02F1/32, C02F1/72, C02F1/78|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S210/908, C02F1/70, C02F1/78, C02F1/722, C02F1/32, C02F2103/06|
|European Classification||C02F1/32, C02F1/72C, C02F1/70|
|29 Nov 1991||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NEC ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING LTD., JAPAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:KAZAMA, MASAHIRO;SANO, MASAHIRO;TAKAYAMA, SEIJI;REEL/FRAME:005954/0251
Effective date: 19911121
|23 Jan 1997||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|11 Jan 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|13 Jan 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12