||Got an Environmental Question? Send it to: EARTH TALK, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881. Or submit your question at: www.emagazine.com. Or e-mail us at: email@example.com.
From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine
Green Your Diet
Meat meals use more resources than plant meals
Vegetarians and vegans are so self-righteous about not eating meat and how meat eating is so bad for the environment. How true are these claims?
Frank Doolittle, Sudbury, Mass.
There has never been a better time to go vegetarian. Mounting evidence suggests that meat-based diets are more than unhealthy. Just about every aspect of meat production from grazing-related loss of cropland, to the inefficiencies of feeding vast quantities of water and grain to cattle, to pollution from factory farms is an environmental disaster with wide and sometimes catastrophic consequences.
There are 20 billion head of livestock on Earth, more than triple the number of people. Global livestock population has increased 60 percent since 1961, and the number of fowl being raised for food has nearly quadrupled, from 4.2 billion to 15.7 billion, according to the Worldwatch Institute.
The 4.8 pounds of grain fed to cattle to make one pound of beef represents a colossal waste of resources in a world teeming with hungry and malnourished people. A 10-acre farm growing soy can support 60 people; growing wheat, 24 people; growing corn, 10 people. But raising cattle supports only two, according to Vegfam.
Food First’s Frances Moore Lappé says to imagine sitting down to an eight-ounce steak. “Then imagine the room filled with 45 to 50 people with empty bowls. … For the feed cost of your steak, each of their bowls could be filled with a full cup of cooked cereal grains.” Harvard nutritionist Jean Mayer says that reducing U.S. meat production 10 percent would free grain to feed 60 million people.
U.S. animal farms generate billions of tons of animal waste every year, which the Environmental Protection Agency says pollute our waterways more than all other industrial sources combined. The infamous 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill dumped 11 million gallons of oil into Prudoe Bay, but the relatively unknown 1995 New River hog-waste spill in North Carolina poured 25 million gallons of excrement into the water, killing 14 million fish and closing 364,000 acres of shell-fishing beds. Hog-waste spills have caused the rapid spread of Pfiesteria piscicida, which has killed a billion fish in North Carolina alone.
Beyond polluting water, beef production alone uses more water than is used in growing America’s entire fruit and vegetable crop. Over a third of all raw materials and fossil fuels consumed in the U.S. are used in animal production. Meat also increases our carbon footprints. Livestock around the world contribute more greenhouse gases (mostly methane) to the atmosphere 18 percent of our total output than emissions from all the world’s cars and trucks, according to the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization.
“There is no question that the choice to become a vegetarian or lower meat consumption is one of the most positive lifestyle changes a person could make in terms of reducing one’s personal impact on the environment,” says Christopher Flavin of the Worldwatch Institute. “The resource requirements and environmental degradation associated with a meat-based diet are very substantial.”
For more information:
• Food First: www.foodfirst.org.
• U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization: www.fao.org.
• Worldwatch Institute: www.worldwatch.org.
Got an environmental question? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; submit it at www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/thisweek: or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org. Read past columns at: www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/archives.php.