|Número de publicación||US3391737 A|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Fecha de publicación||9 Jul 1968|
|Fecha de presentación||20 May 1966|
|Fecha de prioridad||20 May 1966|
|Número de publicación||US 3391737 A, US 3391737A, US-A-3391737, US3391737 A, US3391737A|
|Inventores||Havens Ira T|
|Cesionario original||Halliburton Co|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (6), Citada por (9), Clasificaciones (7)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
July 9, 1968 T. HAvENs WELL CEMENTING PROCESS Filed May 20, 1966 INVENTOR. /64 /r/f//VS BY v United States Patent O 3,391,737 WELL CEMENTING PROCESS Ira T. Havens, El Campo, Tex., assignor to Halliburton Company, Duncan, Okla., a corporation of Delaware Filed May 2t?, 1966, Ser. No. 551,625 6 Claims. (Cl. 166--29) This invention relates to a method of cementing a pipe in a well bore, and more particularly to the cementing of a pipe by jetting a slurry of cement against the well bore lwall while continuously moving the pipe in the well bore.
In the completion of a well, it is customary to cement either a casing or other pipe to the `wall of the well bore. One function of the cement, after it has set to a solid mass, is to prevent fluid communication between the earth formations penetrated by the well bore, However, in some instances, the cement bond has failed allowing iiuid migration between earth formations to occur. In at least some `of these instances, the failure has been due to poor contact lbetween the cement and the wall of the formation. Such failure of the cement bond at the wall of the bore hole is due in part to a layer of drilling mud deposited on the bore hole wall during drilling operations. Various techniques have been used to improve the bonding of the cement to the wall. Wall seratchers or cleaners attached to a pipe mechanically scrape drilling mud from the =wall by reciprocation or rotation of the pipe. Other methods of improving the receptivity of the formation Iwall to bonding include washing by circulating large quantities of water through the formation. However, none of these methods have been completely successful.
It is thus a primary object of the present invention to provide a method for forming a strong formation to cement bond in cementing a pipe in a well formation.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a continuous method of cleaning the wall of a well formation and simultaneously cernenting a pipe -within that formation.
It is a further object of this invention to provide apparatus for sealing a pipe in a wall formation with a stron-g formation to cement bond.
These and other objects of the present invention will be understood from the following description and drawings wherein:
'FIGURES 1 to 4 are schematic views illustrating a well in longitudinal cross section, each figure illustrating a step in the process of this invention.
Brieliy, the present invention comprises cementing a pipe in a well bore by placing a jetting tool on a drill pipe, tubing, casing, first string of multiple casing settings or other pipe and removing the mud filter cake on the Wall .of the 4well bore by hydraulic jet action of a cement slurry, lilling the well bore with cement and setting the pipe therein, The use of cement jetting tools is known in the art as illustrated by U.S. Patent No. 3,052,298. Rotating jet tools, tools with rotating jets or any other suitable `jet tool may be used. After the tool is placed on the pipe, it is then positioned below the deepest possible production zone in the formation and a long life cement is pumped down the pipe and out of the jets with a pressure great enough that the stream of cement jets against the bore hole wall removing all mud cake and debris and replacing it with cement. While cement is moving out of the jets, the pipe is pulled slowly upward causing the jetting tool to move across the desired zone to be cemented. After all important production or other zones have been jetted with cement, the pipe is run back to the bottom of the formation for permanent use.
FIGURE 1 illustrates a drilling pipe 1, vwith a jet tool 2 at its end within a well formation indicated generally ICC by 3. Although only one jetting tool is illustrated, a pipe containing two or more tools may be used. The jet tool lhas jets 4 pointed in various directions and may include a float valve 5 or other suitable means for restricting back flow through the jets 4. A blank guide is indicated at 6.
The ywalls of the formation 7 may be covered by drilling mud, iilter cake, etc. The portion of the formation not occupied by the drill pipe may contain a liquid or other material 8 such Ias water, drilling mud, etc. Production Zones are illustrated at 9.
Cementing may `be initiated when the pipe is in the position shown in FIGURE 1. Cement is pumped by a pump (not shown) down pipe 1 and out jets 4 so that it impinges against the wall of the formation. A high velocity jet of cement slurry of preferably about feet per second, is desirable in order to hydraulically remove any mud cake and replace same with cement thereby providing a satisfactory bond -between the cement and the formation. While continuing to jet cement against the wall of the formation, the pipe is slowly raised. 'FIG- URE 2 illustrates the pipe and jet tool after is has been raised into the vproduction zone. Cement 10 has already been deposited so that it covers the wall of the formation below the zone. The amount of cement deposited against or across the formation depends upon the pumping rate and the rate of raisin-g the drill pipe. FIGURE 2 illustrates the well bore below the tool completely lled with cement. The actual amount of cement introduced during the jetting 'operation may vary as desired, as long as a suiiicient amount of cement impinges against the formation wall so that it completely cleans the wall and leaves the bore -hole below the tool filled Iwith cement. During the jetting operation, the jetting tool should preferably be rotated to insure complete coverage of the entire wall. It is especially advantageous to rotate the tool when it is positioned in important zones such as the production zone indicated in FIGURE 2.
Cementing continues in this manner until the entire area desired to `be cemented has been covered. Normally, this `will include the area starting below the lowest production zone and extending above the highest production Zone. This is illustrated in FIGURE 3 which represents the jet tool at a position above the highest production zone which may be the extent of cementing. If desired, however, cementing could continue to the top of the bore hole.
After the cementing operation has been finished, the pipe is run back to the bottom of the hole to be used as a permanent production casing. The permanent installation is achieved when the cement sets. FIGURE 4 illustrates the pipe in its final position. It will be noted that the jet tool is retained at the bottom of the ppe in the illustration. lf desired, the pipe may be completely removed from the bore hole and the jet tool removed before the pipe is placed in its final position Vshown in FIGURE 4. Normally, however, it may be more convenient to leave the jet tool on the pipe rather than removing the entire pipe from the hole. Float valve 5 or other suitable means may be employed to prevent flow of the slurry into the pipe after jetting has stopped. Usually, this will be determined by the depth of the bore hole relative to the amount of wall cemented.
The method of this invention can be performed using conventional drilling equipment and techniques. For eX- ample, casing centralizers which insure centering the pipe in the hole may be used in this method. Also, a Water wash or chemical wash ahead of the cernenting operation can be advantageously used to remove thickened mud or reduce channeling and to further insure a good bond of the cement to the formation.
Any desired cement composition may be employed with the obvious proviso that the cement composition or slurry must be one that will remain fluid until the completion of the process. Thus, with some cement compositions and in jetting operations which will be carried on over an extended period of time, it may be necessary to introduce well-known retarders, dispersants, fluid loss additives, etc., into the cement. The amount of additive or additives used will, of course, also depend upon the temperature of the formation and other conditions. The tailoring of the cement to the setting conditions of the formation is wellknown to those skilled in the art. In general most cements, including pozzolanic types may be used. Typical cement slurry compositions may contain bentonite and a retarder.
It may be advantageous to use a cement composition having a weight approximately the same as the mud. The jetted lter cake should thus add enough weight to the iluid outside the pipe to cause it to tend to flow back.
As the pipe is raised during the jetting operation, it may be necessary to break olf sections of the pipe at the surface. The oat valve 5 would then control backow while making connections at the surface.
The method of this invention may be carried out as follows. A pipe having a diameter of 41/2 inches is placed in a bore hole having a diameter of approximately 77/3 inches. At the lower end of the pipe is placed a jetting tool comprising a section of pipe having four horizontal tungsten carbide jets of about 5716 diameter spaced 90 apart. A blank guide is attached to the bottom of the jetting tool while a oat valve is placed at the upper end of the jetting tool to prevent cement or other fluids from llowing back into the pipe during periods when the jetting is stopped. The pipe is run to a depth of 6,000 feet by adding pipe sections approximately 30 feet long.
A cement slurry is then pumped into the pipe. A typical cement slurry using API Class A cement is as follows:
Water-10.4 gallons/ sack of cement (94 lbs.). Bentonite-8% by weight of cement. Low fluid loss additive-1% by weight of cement.
52.5% hyroxyethyl cellulose, 80 mesh U.S. Sieve Series viscosity at 20 C. 2% aqueous solution, 22S-235 centipoises. 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 40,000 molecular weight. 37.5% sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensed with formaldehyde. Retarder (calcium lignosulfonate)0.6% by weight of cement. Slurry density-13.1 pounds per gallon of water.
The cement slurry is added under a pressure of 500 p.s.i. at a pumping rate of one barrel per minute in order to obtain a jet velocity of 125 feet per second. The entire pipe is rotated at 10 revolutions per minute and slowly raised in the bore hole at a rate of l0 feet per minute. letting is intermittently terminated in order to remove sections of the drill pipe. Cement deposited in the bore hole is prevented from flowing back up the drill pipe by means of a iloat valve above the jetting tool which closes when jetting is stopped.
When the desired length of the bore hole has been jetted, the drill pipe is run back down to the bottom of the bore hole. The cement column extends about 1350 feet when the pipe is removed. When the pipe is lowered down into the cement, the cement is forced upward in the casing-well bore annulus and extends about 2000 feet when the casing is set in its nal position. Thus, the well bore is cemented from a depth of 6000 feet to a depth of 4000 feet. The actual jetting requires about 2 hours and 15 minutes while about 45 minutes is required for disconnecting pipe joints. The time lapse during the entire jetting operation is thus approximately 3 hours. Because of the slow setting cement composition used, it is possible to position the pipe back in the bore hole before the cement sets. After approximately l2 hours the cement had become set.
In this operation, the jetting tool is left on the drill pipe when it is nally positioned at the bottom of the bore hole, the oat valve preventing flow of cement into the drill pipe. However, after jetting has been ceased, the jetting tool could have been removed.
Having thus described my invention, it is intended that it be limited only by the lawful scope of the appended claims.
1. A method of cementing a pipe in a well bore in such a manner to prevent lluid migration between earth form-ations, the steps comprising:
lowering the pipe to a `desired level in the well bore;
jetting cement against the 'well bore lwall substantially removing any mud cake thereon;
raising the pipe during the jetting step thereby lling the well bore -below with cement; and then re-lowering and placing the pipe in the cement in the well bore.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the lcement is jetted through at least one rotating jetting tool attached to the pipe which is used during the jetting step.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the cement is substantially the same weight as the mud and contains a retarder and low fluid loss additive to slow the setting of the cement.
`4. The method of claim 2 wherein the cement is substantially lthe same weight as the mud.
5. The method of claim 2 wherein the pipe is rotated at about 10 revolutions per minute and slowly raised at about l0 feet per minute while cement slurry is jetted at a velocity of at least about feet per second.
6. A method of cementing a pipe in a well bore and preventing the migration of fluid between earth formations in and along the cemented portion of -the well bore, the steps comprising:
attaching at least one rotating jetting tool to the pipe;
lowering the pipe to a desired level in the well bore; jetting cement having a retarder and a low fluid loss additive through `a jetting tool at a velocity of at least 100 feet per second against the well bore wall substantially removing any mud cake thereon; rotating the jetting tool at about 10 revolutions per minute during the jetting step; raising the pipe and jetting tool at about 10 feet per minute `during the jetting step thereby filling the well bore 4below with cement; and then re-lowering and placing the pipe in the cement in the well bore.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,236,987 4/ 1941 lBechtold 166-29 2,295,803 9/1942 OLeary 166-225 2,371,383 3/1945 Dismukes 166-27 2,646,360 7/1953 Lea .166--31 2,811,206I 10/1957 Klotz 166-21 3,289,760 12/1966` Kammerer 166-21 JAMES A. LEPPINK, Primary Examiner.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US2236987 *||4 Ene 1939||1 Abr 1941||California Portland Cement Co||Method of cementing wells|
|US2295803 *||29 Jul 1940||15 Sep 1942||O'leary Charles M||Cement shoe|
|US2371383 *||6 Dic 1941||13 Mar 1945||Standard Oil Dev Co||Plugging strata in boreholes|
|US2646360 *||29 Ago 1949||21 Jul 1953||Phillips Petroleum Co||Low-water-loss cement slurry|
|US2811206 *||30 Mar 1954||29 Oct 1957||California Research Corp||Method for introducing cementing material into a well bore|
|US3289760 *||10 Feb 1964||6 Dic 1966||Kammerer Jr Archer W||Method and apparatus for cementing and conditioning bore holes|
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US4231617 *||14 Dic 1978||4 Nov 1980||Gulf Oil Corporation||Consolidation of in-situ retort|
|US4235291 *||16 Oct 1978||25 Nov 1980||Mobil Oil Corporation||Treating wells to mitigate flow-after-cementing|
|US4441556 *||17 Ago 1981||10 Abr 1984||Standard Oil Company||Diverter tool and its use|
|US4674573 *||9 Sep 1985||23 Jun 1987||Bode Robert E||Method and apparatus for placing cement plugs in wells|
|US5368103 *||28 Sep 1993||29 Nov 1994||Halliburton Company||Method of setting a balanced cement plug in a borehole|
|US7287592 *||11 Jun 2004||30 Oct 2007||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Limited entry multiple fracture and frac-pack placement in liner completions using liner fracturing tool|
|US8365827||16 Jun 2010||5 Feb 2013||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Fracturing method to reduce tortuosity|
|US20050274522 *||11 Jun 2004||15 Dic 2005||Surjaatmadja Jim B||Limited entry multiple fracture and frac-pack placement in liner completions using liner fracturing tool|
|US20140352964 *||4 Jun 2013||4 Dic 2014||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Systems and Methods for Removing a Section of Casing|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||166/289, 166/293, 166/222|
|Clasificación internacional||E21B33/13, E21B33/14|