Each day near Petersburg, Ky., 1,500 to 4,000 visitors, including busloads from Christian schools and churches, stand in line for as long as an hour to wander 60,000 square feet of animatronic exhibits presenting the Bible's creation story as fact.
It's been six months since the Creation Museum opened to crowds and protests, and the controversial attraction has proven more popular than even organizers had predicted.
Halfway into its first year, it is on the verge of surpassing its projected year-long attendance goal of 250,000. Officials now expect nearly 400,000 people to pass through the doors by year's end....
How about this "objective" quote from the article:
"Exhibits rebut the evidence of evolution such as Lucy, the Ethiopian hominid whose 3.2-million-year-old remains are a link between apes and humans."
Whose remains ARE a link between apes and humans? The point of the museum is that creation scientists would view those handful of bone shards differently, without the lens of evolution clouding their view.
I know this drives the evolutionists mad. They can't tolerate dissent.
Evolutionists: Welcome to the world where your opinion isn't any better than the next guy's. After all, opinion is at stake here because unless you have an infallible record to compare with, science is simply opinionated interpretation of observations.
As much as they like to promote their ideas as proven facts, there is no such thing. Which is why their opinions and teachings keep changing.
At the end of the day, if a person accepts the Bible as God's infallible Word, then this issue comes down to one simple question. Should we believe an infallible creator who wrote about what he did, or do we believe fallible man's opinions about what happened to man? It's not a hard decision.