Re: Merge dialog
From: Jean-Marc van Leerdam <j.m.van.leerdam_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-10-19 11:31:25 CEST
On 18/10/2007, Stefan KÃ¼ng <email@example.com> wrote:
A use case for this is: 'this (bug)fix from trunk should also go into branch X', right?
I would expect to have to supply a URL pointing to the source and a From/Through range of revisions (possibly a non-contiguous list of revision numbers). The merge is applied to my Working Copy
Getting a list of revisions that have affected the source URL and letting me select the revisions is expected in this case.
> 2) merge the difference between two urls: two source urls with each
A use case for this is: 'branch development is done, lets move the change into trunk' right? And it should 'automatically' work even if the branch has received merges as described in option 1)?
Do you have a way of determining if the server knows about merge tracking, and just not support the extended merge stuff in that case?
Oh, and what would be a use case for 'reverse merging'? I don't understand what that would do.
-- Regards, Jean-Marc ---------------- ___ // \\ @@ "De Chelonian Mobile" / \_/ \/._) TortoiseSVN <\_/_\_/ / The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control /_/ \_\ Check out http://tortoisesvn.orgReceived on Fri Oct 19 11:31:33 2007
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.