US 6146894 A
Dominant negative alleles of human mismatch repair genes can be used to generate hypermutable cells and organisms. By introducing these genes into cells and transgenic animals, new cell lines and animal varieties with novel and useful properties can be prepared more efficiently than by relying on the natural rate of mutation.
1. A method of making a mammalian hypermutable cell, comprising the step of: introducing into a mammalian cell a polynucleotide comprising a dominant negative allele of the mismatch repair gene, PMS2, whereby the cell becomes hypermutable.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the polynucleotide is introduced by transfection of a suspension of cells in vitro.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the mismatch repair gene is human PMS2.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the allele comprises a truncation mutation.
5. The method of claim 3 wherein the allele comprises a truncation mutation at codon 134 as shown in SEQ ID NO: 1.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the truncation mutation is a thymidine at nucleotide 424 of wild-type PMS2 as shown in SEQ ID NO: 1.
7. A homogeneous composition of cultured, hypermutable, mammalian cells which comprise a dominant negative allele of the mismatch repair gene, PMS2.
8. The homogenous composition of claim 7 wherein the mismatch repair gene is human PMS2.
9. The homogeneous composition of claim 7 wherein the cells express a protein consisting of the first 133 amino acids of human PMS2 which functions as a dominant-negative protein.
10. The homogeneous composition of claim 7 wherein the cells express a protein consisting of the first 133 amino acids of PMS2 which functions as a dominant-negative protein.
11. A method of generating a mutation in a gene of interest comprising the steps of: growing a population of mammalian cells comprising the gene of interest and a dominant negative allele of the mismatch repair gene PMS2, wherein the cell is hypermutable; identifying a cell wherein the gene of interest harbors a mutation.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing a nucleotide sequence of the gene of interest.
13. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing mRNA transcribed from the gene of interest.
14. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing a protein encoded by the gene of interest.
15. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing the phenotype of the gene of interest.
16. The method of claim 11 wherein the mammalian cells are made by the process of introducing a polynucleotide comprising a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene into a mammalian cell, whereby the cell becomes hypermutable.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the mismatch repair gene encodes a truncated PMS2.
18. The method of claim 16 wherein the mismatch repair gene encodes a truncated human PMS2.
19. The method of claim 16 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing a nucleotide sequence of the gene of interest.
20. The method of claim 16 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing mRNA transcribed from the gene of interest.
21. The method of claim 16 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing a protein encoded by the gene of interest.
22. The method of claim 16 wherein the step of identifying comprises analyzing the phenotype of the gene of interest.
This invention was made using a U.S. government grant from the NIH (CA43460). Therefore, the U.S. government retains certain rights to the invention.
The invention is related to the area of mismatch repair genes. In particular it is related to the field of mutagenesis.
Within the past four years, the genetic cause of the Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome II, has been ascertained for the majority of kindreds affected with the disease (13). The molecular basis of HNPCC involves genetic instability resulting from defective mismatch repair (MMR). To date, six genes have been identified in humans that encode for proteins and appear to participate in the MMR process, including the mutS homologs GTBP, hMSH2, and hMSH3 and the mutL homologs hMLH1, hPMS1, and hPMS2 (2,7,11,17,20,21,22, 24). Germline mutations in four of these genes (hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, and hPMS2) have been identified in HNPCC kindreds (2,11,13,17,24). Though the mutator defect that arises from the MMR deficiency can affect any DNA sequence, microsatellite sequences are particularly sensitive to MMR abnormalities (14). Microsatellite instability is therefore a useful indicator of defective MMR. In addition to its occurrence in virtually all tumors arising in HNPCC patients, Microsattelite instability is found in a small fraction of sporadic tumors with distinctive molecular and phenotypic properties (27).
HNPCC is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, so that the normal cells of affected family members contain one mutant allele of the relevant MMR gene (inherited from an affected parent) and one wild-type allele (inherited from the unaffected parent). During the early stages of tumor development, however, the wild-type allele is inactivated through a somatic mutation, leaving the cell with no functional MMR gene and resulting in a profound defect in MMR activity. Because a somatic mutation in addition to a germ-line mutation is required to generate defective MMR in the tumor cells, this mechanism is generally referred to as one involving "two hits," analogous to the biallelic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes that initiate other hereditary cancers (11,13,25). In line with this two-hit mechanism, the non-neoplastic cells of HNPCC patients generally retain near normal levels of MMR activity due to the presence of the wild-type allele.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for rendering cells hypermutable.
It is another object of the present invention to provide genetically altered cell lines.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a method to produce transgenic animals that are hypermutable.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide genetically altered transgenic animals.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a method of mutating a gene of interest in a cell.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a method of mutating a gene of interest in an animal.
These and other objects of the invention are provided by one or more of the embodiments described below. In one embodiment of the invention, a method for making a hypermutable cell is provided. A polynucleotide encoding a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene is introduced into a cell. The cell becomes hypermutable as a result of the introduction of the gene.
In another embodiment of the invention, an isolated hypermutable cell is provided. The cell comprises a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene.
In another embodiment of the invention, a hypermutable transgenic animal is provided. The animal comprises a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene.
In another embodiment of the invention, a method is provided for introducing a mutation into a gene of interest. A polynucleotide encoding a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene is introduced into a cell. The cell becomes hypermutable as a result of the introduction of the gene. The cell further comprises a gene of interest. The cell is grown. The cell is tested to determine whether the gene of interest harbors a mutation.
In another embodiment of the invention, a method is provided for generating a mutation in a gene of interest. A transgenic animal comprising a polynucleotide encoding a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene is grown. The animal comprises a gene of interest. The animal is tested to determine whether the gene of interest harbors a mutation.
These and other embodiments of the invention provide the art with methods that can generate enhanced mutability in cells and animals as well as providing cells and animals harboring potentially useful mutations.
FIGS. 1A-B. Diagrams of PMS2 expression vectors (FIG. 1A) and pCAR reporters (FIG. 1B).
FIGS. 2A-C. SH cells co-transfected with pCAR reporters and PMS2 expression vectors after 17 days of drug selection. (FIG. 2A) Western blots of lysates from untransfected SH cells (lane 1) or SH cells transfected with PMS2-NOT (lane 2) or PMS2-WT (lane 3). The arrow indicates the 110 kD protein expected for hPMS2. (FIG. 2B) Western blots of lysates from untransfected SH cells (lane 1) or SH cells transfected with PMS2-NOT (lane 2) or PMS2-134 (lane 3). The arrow indicates the 14 kD protein expected for hPMS-134. Both A and B were probed with an antibody generated against the N-terminus of hPMS2. The upper polypeptides in A and the lower polypeptides in B represent cross-reactive hamster proteins. (FIG. 2C)β-galactosidase activity in lysates derived from SH cells co-transfected with PMS2-NOT (lane 1), PMS2-WT (lane 2), or PMS2-134 (lane 3) plus reporter plasmid. Relative β-galactosidase activities are defined as the ratio of β-galactosidase activity in cells transfected with pCAR-OF compared to that in cells transfected with pCAR-IF; this normalization controlled for transfection efficiency and controlled for β-galactosidase activity in the cells expressing the various PMS2 effector genes.
FIGS. 3A-D. In situ β-galactosidase activity of pooled clones of SH cells stably transduced with the PMS2-NOT (FIG. 3A), PMS2-WT (FIG. 3B), or PMS2-134 (FIG. 3C) expression vectors, then re-transfected with pCAR-OF reporter. After 17 days of drug selection, the colonies were pooled, cultured, and stained for β-galactosidase activity. A pooled culture of of PMS2-134 transduced SH cells expressing β-galactosidase from pCAR-OF is visible in FIG. 3C. The level of expression is lower, as expected, than in SH cells transfected with the pCAR-IF reporter plasmid, shown as a positive control in FIG. 3D. Each of the fields illustrated is representative of that found in triplicate experiments.
FIGS. 4A-C. Protein expression and β-galactosidase activity in stably transduced SH clones. (FIG. 4A) Western blots of lysates from clones stably transduced with PMS2-NOT (lanes 1-3) or PMS2-WT (lanes 4-6). (FIG. 4B) Western blots of lysates from clones stably transduced with PMS2-NOT (lanes 1-3) or PMS2-134 (lanes 4-6). (The arrows indicate the polypeptide of the appropriate molecular weight. The upper (FIG. 4A) and lower (FIG. 4B) molecular weight polypeptides are nonspecific proteins. (FIG. 4C) The clones expressing PMS2-NOT (lane 1A-3A), PMS2-WT (lanes 1B-3B), or PMS2-134 (lanes 1C-3C) were transduced with pCAR-OF or pCAR-IF reporter plasmids and multiple subclones selected in hygromycin plus geneticin were harvested 17 days later and assayed for β-galactosidase activity. Relative β-galactosidase activities are defined as the ratio of β-galactosidase activity in cells transduced with pCAR-OF compared to that in cells transduced with pCAR-IF.
FIGS. 5A-C. Immunoprecipitation of in vitro translated hPMS2 and hMLH1 proteins. (FIG. 5A) Labelled (indicated by an asterisk) or unlabelled proteins were incubated with an antibody to the C-terminus of hPMS2 in lanes 1-3 and to hMLH1 in lanes 4-6. Lane 7 contains a nonprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. The PMS-135 contains codons 135-862 of hPMS2. The major translation products of hPMS2 and hMLH1 are indicated. (FIG. 5B) Labelled hPMS-134 (containing codons 1-134 of hPMS2) was incubated in the presense or absence of unlabelled hMLH1 plus an antibody to hMLH1 (lanes 1 and 2, respectively). Lane 3 contains lysate from a nonprogrammed reticulolysate. (FIG. 5C) Labelled proteins were incubated with an antibody to the N-terminus of hPMS2. Lane 6 contains a nonprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. In both FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B, autoradiographs of immunoprecipitated products are shown.
FIG. 6. Complementation of MMR activity in transduced SH cells. Lysates from pooled clones stably transduced with PMS2-NOT, PMS2-WT, or PMS2-134 were complemented with purified MutSα or MutLα MMR components using the 5'G/T heteroduplex substrate. The values are presented as the percentage of repair activity in each case compared to that in lysates complemented with both purified MutLα and MutSα components to normalize for repair efficiency in the different lysate backgrounds. The values shown represent the average of at least three different determinations.
The inventors have discovered a method for developing hypermutable cells and animals by taking advantage of newly discovered alleles of human mismatch repair genes. Dominant negative alleles of such genes, when introduced into cells or transgenic animals, increase the rate of spontaneous mutations by reducing the effectiveness of DNA repair and thereby render the cells or animals hypermutable. Hypermutable cells or animals can then be utilized to develop new mutations in a gene of interest.
The process of mismatch repair, also called mismatch proofreading, is carried out by protein complexes in cells ranging from bacteria to mammalian cells. A mismatch repair gene is a gene that encodes one of the proteins of such a mismatch repair complex. Although not wanting to be bound by any particular theory of mechanism of action, a mismatch repair complex is believed to detect distortions of the DNA helix resulting from non-complementary pairing of nucleotide bases. The non-complementary base on the newer DNA strand is excised, and the excised base is replaced with the appropriate base which is complementary to the older DNA strand. In this way, cells eliminate many mutations which occur as a result of mistakes in DNA replication.
Dominant negative alleles cause a mismatch repair defective phenotype even in the presence of a wild-type allele in the same cell. An example of a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene is the human gene hPMS2-134, which carries a truncation mutation at codon 134. The mutation causes the product of this gene to abnormally terminate at the position of the 134th amino acid, resulting in a shortened polypeptide containing the N-terminal 133 amino acids. Such a mutation causes an increase in the rate of mutations which accumulate in cells after DNA replication. Expression of a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene results in impairment of mismatch repair activity, even in the presence of the wild-type allele. Any allele which produces such effect can be used in this invention.
Dominant negative alleles of a mismatch repair gene can be obtained from the cells of humans, animals, yeast, bacteria, or other organisms. Such alleles can be identified by screening cells for defective mismatch repair activity. The cells may be mutagenized or not. Cells from animals or humans with cancer can be screened for defective mismatch repair. Cells from colon cancer patients may be particularly useful. Genomic DNA, cDNA, or mRNA from any cell encoding a mismatch repair protein can be analyzed for variations from the wild type sequence. Dominant negative alleles of a mismatch repair gene can also be created artificially, for example, by producing variants of the hPMS2-134 allele or other mismatch repair genes. Various techniques of site-directed mutagenesis can be used. The suitability of such alleles, whether natural or artificial, for use in generating hypermutable cells or animals can be evaluated by testing the mismatch repair activity caused by the allele in the presence of one or more wild-type alleles, to determine if it is a dominant negative allele.
A cell or an animal into which a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene has been introduced will become hypermutable. This means that the spontaneous mutation rate of such cells or animals is elevated compared to cells or animals without such alleles. The degree of elevation of the spontaneous mutation rate can be at least 2-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 20-fold, 50-fold, 100-fold, 200-fold, 500-fold, or 1000-fold that of the normal cell or animal.
According to one aspect of the invention, a polynucleotide encoding a dominant negative form of a mismatch repair protein is introduced into a cell or a transgenic animal. The gene can be any dominant negative allele encoding a protein which is part of a mismatch repair complex, for example, PMS2, PMS1, MLH1, or MSH2. The dominant negative allele can be naturally occurring or made in the laboratory. The polynucleotide can be in the form of genomic DNA, cDNA, RNA, or a chemically synthesized polynucleotide. The polynucleotide can be introduced into the cell by transfection.
Transfection is any process whereby a polynucleotide is introduced into a cell. The process of transfection can be carried out in a living animal, e.g., using a vector for gene therapy, or it can be carried out in vitro, e.g., using a suspension of one or more isolated cells in culture. The cell can be any type of eukaryotic cell, including, for example, cells isolated from humans or other primates, mammals or other vertebrates, invertebrates, and single celled organisms such as protozoa or yeast.
In general, transfection will be carried out using a suspension of cells, or a single cell, but other methods can also be applied as long as a sufficient fraction of the treated cells or tissue incorporates the polynucleotide so as to allow transfected cells to be grown and utilized. The protein product of the polynucleotide may be transiently or stably expressed in the cell. Techniques for transfection are well known. Available techniques for introducing polynucleotides include but are not limited to electroporation, transduction, cell fusion, the use of calcium chloride, and packaging of the polynucleotide together with lipid for fusion with the cells of interest. Once a cell has been transfected with the mismatch repair gene, the cell can be grown and reproduced in culture. If the transfection is stable, such that the gene is expressed at a consistent level for many cell generations, then a cell line results.
An isolated cell is a cell obtained from a tissue of humans or animals by mechanically separating out individual cells and transferring them to a suitable cell culture medium, either with or without pretreatment of the tissue with enzymes, e.g., collagenase or trypsin. Such isolated cells are typically cultured in the absence of other types of cells. Cells selected for the introduction of a dominant negative allele of a mismatch repair gene may be derived from a eukaryotic organism in the form of a primary cell culture or an immortalized cell line, or may be derived from suspensions of single-celled organisms.
A polynucleotide encoding a dominant negative form of a mismatch repair protein can be introduced into the genome of an animal by producing a transgenic animal. The animal can be any species for which suitable techniques are available to produce transgenic animals. For example, transgenic animals can be prepared from domestic livestock, e.g., cows, pigs, sheep, goats, horses, etc.; from animals used for the production of recombinant proteins, e.g., cows, pigs, or goats that express a recombinant protein in their milk; or experimental animals for research or product testing, e.g., mice, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits, etc.
Any method for making transgenic animals known in the art can be used. According to one process of producing a transgenic animal, the polynucleotide is injected into a fertilized egg of the animal and the injected egg is placed into a pseudo-pregnant female. The egg develops into a mature animal in which the polynucleotide is incorporated and expressed. The fertilized egg is produced in vitro from the egg and sperm of donor animals of the same species as the pseudo-pregnant female, who is prepared by hormone treatments to receive the fertilized egg and become pregnant. An alternative method for producing transgenic animals involves introducing the polynucleotide into embryonic cells by injection or transfection and reintroducing the embryonic cells into the developing embryo. With this method, however, if the polynucleotide is not incorporated into germline cells, the gene will not be passed on to the progeny. Therefore, a transgenic animal produced by this method must be evaluated to determine whether the gene is incorporated into germ cells of the animal. Once transgenic animals are produced, they can be grown to reproductive age, when they can be mated to produce and maintain a colony of transgenic animals.
Once a transfected cell line or a colony of transgenic animals has been produced, it can be used to generate new mutations in one or more gene(s) of interest. A gene of interest can be any gene naturally possessed by the cell line or transgenic animal or introduced into the cell line or transgenic animal. An advantage of using such cells or animals to induce mutations is that the cell or animal need not be exposed to mutagenic chemicals or radiation, which may have secondary harmful effects, both on the object of the exposure and on the workers.
Mutations can be detected by analyzing for alterations in the genotype of the cells or animals, for example by examining the sequence of genomic DNA, cDNA, messenger RNA, or amino acids associated with the gene of interest. Mutations can also be detected by screening the phenotype of the gene. A mutant phenotype can be detected by identifying alterations in electrophoretic mobility, spectroscopic properties, or other physical or structural characteristics of a protein encoded by a mutant gene. One can also screen for altered function of the protein in situ, in isolated form, or in model systems. One can screen for alteration of any property of the cell or animal associated with the function of the gene of interest.
The above disclosure generally describes the present invention. A more complete understanding can be obtained by reference to the following specific examples which are provided herein for purposes of illustration only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
A profound defect in MMR was found in the normal cells of two HNPCC patients. That this defect was operative in vivo was demonstrated by the widespread presence of microsattelite instability in non-neoplastic cells of such patients. One of the two patients had a germ-line truncating mutation of the hPMS2 gene at codon 134 (the hPMS2-134 mutation), while the other patient had a small germ-line deletion within the hMLH1 gene (26). These data thus contradicted the two-hit model generally believed to explain the biochemical and biological features of HNPCC patients. The basis for this MMR deficiency in the normal cells of these patients was unclear, and several potential explanations were offered. For example, it was possible that the second allele of the relevant MMR gene was inactivated in the germ-line of these patients through an undiscovered mechanism, or that unknown mutations of other genes involved in the MMR process were present that cooperated with the known germ-line mutation. It is clear from knock-out experiments in mice that MMR-deficiency is compatible with normal growth and development, supporting these possibilities (1,3,6). Alternatively, it was possible that the mutant alleles exerted a dominant negative effect, resulting in MMR deficiency even in the presence of the wild-type allele of the corresponding MMR gene and all other genes involved in the MMR process. To distinguish between these possibilities, we expressed the truncated polypeptide encoded by the hPMS2-134 mutation in an MMR proficient cell line and analyzed its effect on the cell's MMR activity. The results showed that this mutant could indeed exert a dominant negative effect, resulting in biochemical and genetic manifestations of MMR deficiency.
The MMR proficient Syrian hamster TK- ts13 cell line (hereafter called SH cells) was cotransfected with various hPMS2 expression plasmids plus reporter constructs for assessing MMR activity. The hPMS2 expression plasmids contained the normal hPMS2 gene product or the truncated hPMS2 gene identified in the patient described above (PMS2-WT and PMS2-134, respectively, FIG. 1A). An "empty" vector devoid of hPMS2 sequences (PMS2-NOT, FIG. 1A) served as an additional control. The reporter construct pCAR-OF (out of frame) contained a hygromycin resistance gene plus a β-galactosidase gene containing a 29 bp out-of-frame poly-CA tract at the 5' end of its coding region. The reporter construct pCAR-IF (in frame) was identical except that the poly-CA tract was 27 bp and therefore did not disrupt the β-galactosidase reading frame (FIG. 1B). The pCAR-OF reporter would not generate β-galactosidase activity unless a frame-restoring mutation (i.e., insertion or deletion) arose following transfection.
Three different transfection schemes were used to evaluate the effects of the PMS2-134 mutation on SH cells. In the first scheme, the expression vectors plus the reporters were co-transfected together. Pools containing greater than 100 clones were generated following selection with hygromycin for 17 days and harvested for Western blot and β-galactosidase assays. SH cells transduced with PMS2-WT and PMS2-134 synthesized polypeptides of the expected size, as assessed with anti-hPMS2 antibodies on Western blots (FIGS. 2A and 2B). As expected, virtually no P-galactosidase activity was observed in SH cells transfected with the pCAR-OF reporter plus PMS2-NOT (FIG. 2C). However, SH cells transfected with PMS2-134 expressed considerable β-galactosidase activity, significantly more than those transfected with PMS2-WT (FIG. 2C). These results suggested that the truncated polypeptide encoded by the PMS2-134 construct perturbs the endogenous MMR machinery, resulting in deletions or insertions that restored the reading frame. The exact nature of these presumed deletions or insertions could not be assessed, as multiple copies of the reporter constructs were transduced under our conditions, and the wild type β-galactosidase sequence was in great excess over the expected mutants, precluding their demonstration by direct sequencing.
In the second scheme, SH cells were co-transfected with each of the PMS2 expression vectors plus the hygromycin-resistance plasmid pLHL4. Hygromycin resistant cultures containing greater than 100 clones were pooled and expanded. These cultures were then co-transfected with pCAR-IF or pCAR-OF reporters plus a separate plasmid allowing geneticin selection. Two weeks later, the pooled cells, each containing more than 100 colonies resistant to both hygromycin and geneticin, were stained with X-gal to assess β-galactosidase activity. As shown in FIG. 3, the cultures transfected with PMS2-134 (panel C) contained many blue cells, while virtually no cells were blue in the cultures transfected with PMS2-NOT or PMS2-WT (panels A and B, respectively). In each case, transfection efficiency was controlled by parallel transfections using pCAR-IF which also served as a control for β-galactosidase activity of cells expressing the various PMS2 effector genes, which resulted in similar β-galactosidase expression levels in all cases (example in FIG. 3D). Increases in β-galactosidase activity after PMS2-134 transfection compared to PMS2-WT transfection were also observed when a similar experimental protocol was applied to the MMR-proficient human embryonic kidney cell line 293. These cells were cotransfected with the pCAR-OF plus the various PMS2 effector plasmids and selected for 17 days in hygromycin. At day 17, colonies were stained with X-gal to assess β-galactosidase activity and scored for β-galactosidase expressing cells. As shown in Table 1, only those cells expressing the PMS2-134 polypeptide expressed a detectable β-galactosidase activity. These data demonstrate a similar dominant negative effect of the hPMS2-134 protein in both rodent and human systems and validate the utility of the rodent system in these studies.
In the third scheme, SH cells were transfected with each of the PMS2 expression vectors as described for the second scheme, but individual clones, rather than pooled clones, were expanded following drug selection. Of twenty clones transfected with PMS2-WT, five were shown to express readily detectable levels of full-length PMS2 proteins (examples in FIG. 4A, lanes 4-6). Similar analyses of twenty PMS2-134 clones revealed four clones which expressed truncated PMS2 polypeptides of the expected size (examples in FIG. 4B, lanes 4-6 ). Three clones expressing full-length or truncated PMS2 proteins, as well as three randomly selected clones from PMS2-NOT transfected cells (FIGS. 4A and 4B, lanes 1-3) were chosen for further analysis. The individual clones were tested for β-galactosidase activity following co-transfection with pCAR-OF plus the pNTK plasmid, as described above for the pooled clones. As shown in FIG. 4C, each of the three clones (lanes 3A-3C) expressing the truncated hPMS2 polypeptide yielded much higher β-galactosidase activities following transfection with pCAR-OF than did the clones expressing the full-length hPMS2 protein (lanes 2A-2C) or no hPMS2 protein (lanes 1A-1C).
TABLE 1______________________________________β-galactosidase expression of 293 clones transfected with pCAR-OF reporter construct plus PMS2 effector plasmids. 293 cells were cotransfected with the pCAR-OF β-galactosidase reporter plasmid plus the PMS2-NOT, WT, or -134 effector plasmids. Transfected cells were selected in hygromycin for 17 days and stained with x-gal for β-galactosidase activity (bue colored cells). The results below represent the mean +/- standard deviation of triplicate experiments. Sample Blue colonies White colonies______________________________________PMS2-NOT 0 +/- 0 17 +/- 2.7 PMS2-WT 0 +/- 0 18 +/- 4.0 PMS2-134 15 +/- 2.1 6 +/- 2.1______________________________________
Plasmids. The full-length wild-type hPMS2 cDNA was obtained from a human Hela cDNA library as described (18). An hPMS2 cDNA containing a termination codon at amino acid 134 was obtained via RT-PCR from the patient in which the mutation was discovered (9). The cDNA fragments were cloned into the BamHI site into the pSG5 vector, which contains an SV40 promoter followed by an SV40 polyadenylation signal (8). The pCAR reporter vectors described in FIG. 1 were constructed as described in ref. 21 and 25.
Cell lines and transfection. Syrian Hamster fibroblast Tk- ts13 cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured as described (15). Stably transfected cell lines expressing hPMS2 were created by cotransfection of the PMS2 expression vectors and the pLHL4 plasmid encoding the hygromycin resistance gene at a ratio of 3:1 (pCAR:pLHL4) and selected with hygromycin. Stably transfected cell lines containing pCAR reporters were generated by co-transfection of pCAR vectors together with either pNTK plasmid encoding the neomycin resistance plasmid or with pLHL4. All transfections were performed using calcium phosphate as previously described (15).
β-galactosidase assay. Seventeen days following transfection with pCAR, β-galactosidase assays were performed using 20 μg of protein in 45 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 M NaPO4 and 0.6 mg/ml Chlorophenol red-β-D-galatopyranoside (CPRG, Boehringer Mannheim). Reactions were incubated for 1 hour, terminated by the addition of 0.5 M Na2 CO3, and analyzed by spectrophotometry at 576 nm (16). For in situ β-galactosidase staining, cells were fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS and incubated in 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 3.3 mM K4 Fe(CN)6, 33 mM K3 Fe(CN)6, 0.2% X-Gal for 2 hours at 37° C.
The most likely explanation for the differences in β-galactosidase activity between PMS2-WT and PMS2-134 transfected cells was that the PMS2-134 protein disturbed MMR activity, resulting in a higher frequency of mutation within the pCAR-OF reporter and re-establishing the ORF. To directly test the hypothesis that MMR was altered, we employed a biochemical assay for MMR with the individual clones described in FIG. 4. Nuclear extracts were prepared from the clones and incubated with heteroduplex substrates containing either a /CA\ insertion-deletion or a G/T mismatch under conditions described previously. The /CA\ and G/T heteroduplexes were used to test repair from the 3' and 5' directions, respectively. There was a dramatic difference between the PMS2-134 expressing clones and the other clones in these assays (Table 2A). While all clones repaired substrates from the 3' direction (/CA\ heteroduplex), cells expressing the PMS2-134 polypeptide had very little 5' repair activity. A similar directional defect in mismatch repair was evident with pooled clones resulting from PMS2-134 transfection, or when the heteroduplex contained a 24 base pair loop, examples of which are shown in Table 2B. A small decrease in MMR activity was observed in the 3' /CA\ PMS2-WT repair assays, perhaps a result of interference in the biochemical assays by overexpression of the PMS2 protein. No significant activity was caused by PMS2-WT in the in situ β-galactosidase assays FIG. 3; Table 1), a result more likely to reflect the in vivo condition.
TABLE 2______________________________________Mismatch repair activity of nuclear extracts from SH clones (A) or pooled cultures (B). The extracts were tested for MMR activity with 24 fmol of heteroduplex. *These data represent similar results derived from greater than five independent experiments.A. SH clones* Repaired substrate (fmol/15 min)Cell Line 3' /CA\ 5' G/T______________________________________ PMS2-NOT clone A 10.2 3.5 clone B 12.7 2.9 clone C 13.5 5.5 PMS2-WT clone A 2.8 2.2 clone B 5.7 4.8 clone C 4.7 2.9 PMS2-134 clone A 2.5 0.0 clone B 2.4 0.0 clone C 5.0 0.5______________________________________B. Pooled cultures Repaired substrate (fmol/15 min)Cell Line 3'G/T 5'G/T 3'/CTG\ 5'/CTG\______________________________________ PMS2-NOT 2.07 +/- 2.37 +/- 3.45 +/- 2.77 +/- 0.09 0.37 1.35 1.37 PMS2-WT 1.65 +/- 1.86 +/- 1.13 +/- 1.23 +/- 0.94 0.57 0.23 0.65 PMS2-134 0.14 +/- 0.0 +/- 1.31 +/- 0.0 +/- 0.2 0.0 0.66 0.0______________________________________
Western blots. Equal number of cells were lysed directly in lysis buffer (60 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.001% bromophenol blue) and boiled for 5 minutes. Lysate proteins were separated by electrophoresis on 4-12% Tris-glycine gels (for analysis of full-length hPMS2) or 4-20% Tris-glycine gels (for analysis of hPMS2-134). Gels were electroblotted onto Immobilon-P (Millipore) in 48 mM Tris base, 40 mM glycine, 0.0375% SDS, 20% methanol and blocked overnight at 4° C. in Tris-buffered saline plus 0.05% Tween-20 and 5% condensed milk. Filters were probed with a polyclonal antibody generated against residues 2-20 of hPMS2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and a horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody, using chemilluminescence for detection (Pierce).
In vitro translation. Linear DNA fragments containing hPMS2 and hMLH1 cDNA sequences were prepared by PCR, incorporating sequences for in vitro transcription and translation in the sense primer. A full-length hMLH1 fragment was prepared using the sense primer 5'-ggatcctaatacgactcactatagggaga ccaccatgtcgttcgtggcaggg-3' (codons 1-6) and the antisense primer 5'-taagtcttaagtgctaccaac-3' (located in the 3' untranslated region, nt 2411-2433), using a wild-type hMLH1 cDNA clone as template. A full-length hPMS2 fragment was prepared with the sense primer 5'-ggatcctaatacgactcactatagggagaccaccatggaacaattgcctgcgg-3' (codons 1-6) and the antisense primer 5'-aggttagtgaagactctgtc-3' (located in 3' untranslated region, nt 2670-2690) using a cloned hPMS2 cDNA as template. A fragment encoding the amino-terminal 134 amino acids of hPMS2 was prepared using the same sense primer and the antisense primer 5'-agtcgagttccaaccttcg-3. A fragment containing codons 135-862 of hPMS135 was generated using the sense primer 5'-ggatcctaatacgactcactatagggagaccaccatgatgtttgatcacaatgg-3' (codons 135-141) and the same antisense primer as that used for the full-length hPMS2 protein. These fragments were used to produce proteins via the coupled transcription-translation system (Promega). The reactions were supplemented with 35 S-labelled methionine or unlabelled methionine, as indicated in the text. The PMS135 and hMLH1 proteins could not be simultaneously radiolabelled and immunoprecipitated because of their similar molecular weights precluded resolution. Lower molecular weight bands are presumed to be degradation products and/or polypeptides translated from alternative internal methionines.
Immunoprecipitation. Immunoprecipitations were performed on in vitro translated proteins by mixing the translation reactions with 1 μg of the MLH1 specific monoclonal antibody (mAB) MLH14 (Oncogene Science, Inc.), a polyclonal antibody generated to codons 2-20 of hPMS2 described above, or a polyclonal antibody generated to codons 843-862 of hPMS2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) in 400 μl of EBC buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.5% NP40). After incubation for 1 hr at 4° C., protein A sepharose (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 10% and reactions were incubated at 4° C. for 1 hour. Proteins bound to protein A were washed five times in EBC and separated by electrophoresis on 4-20% Tris-glycine gels, which were then dried and autoradiographed.
Biochemical assays for mismatch repair. MMR activity in nuclear extracts was performed as described, using 24 fmol of substrate (12,25). Complementation assays were done by adding ˜100 ng of purified MutLα or MutSα components to 100 μg of nuclear extract, adjusting the final KCl concentration to 100 mM (4,10,30). The substrates used in these experiments contain a strand break 181 nucleotides 5' or 125 nucleotides 3' to the mismatch. Values represent experiments performed at least in duplicate.
To elucidate the mechanism by which hPMS2-134 affected MMR, we analyzed the interaction between hPMS2 and hMLH1. Previous studies have shown that these two proteins dimerize to form a functionally active complex (12, 28). Proteins were synthesized in vitro using reticulocyte lysates, employing RNA generated from cloned templates. The full-length hMLH1 and hPMS2 proteins bound to each other and were co-precipitated with antibodies to either protein, as expected (data not shown). To determine the domain of hPMS2 which bound to hMLH1, the amino terminus (codons 1-134), containing the most highly conserved domain among mutL proteins (19,24), and the carboxyl terminus (codons 135-862) were separately cloned and proteins produced in vitro in coupled transcription-translation reactions. When a 35 S-labelled, full length hMLH1 protein (FIG. 5A, lane 5) was mixed with the unlabelled carboxyl terminal hPMS2 polypeptide, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to the carboxyl terminus of hPMS2 efficiently immunoprecipitated the labeled hMLH1 protein (lane 1). No hMLH1 protein was precipitated in the absence of hPMS2 (lane 2). Conversely, when the 35 S-labelled carboxyl-terminus of hPMS2 (lane 3) was incubated with unlabelled, full-length hMLH1 protein, an anti-hMLH1 mAb precipitated the hPMS2 polypeptide (lane 4). In the absence of the unlabelled hMLH1 protein, no hPMS2 protein was precipitated by this mAb (lane 6). The same antibody failed to immunoprecipitate the amino-terminus of hPMS2 (amino acids 1-134) when mixed with unlabelled MLH1 protein (FIG. 5B, lane 1). This finding was corroborated by the converse experiment in which radiolabelled hPMS2-134 (FIG. 5C, lane 1) was unable to coprecipitate radiolabelled MLH1 when precipitations were done using an N-terminal hPMS2 antibody (FIG. 5C, lane 2) while this antibody was shown to be able to coprecipitate MLH1 when mixed with wild-type hPMS2 (FIG. 5C, lane 4).
The initial steps of MMR are dependent on two protein complexes, called MutSα and MutLα (14). As the amino terminus of hPMS2 did not mediate binding of hPMS2 to hMLH1, it was of interest to determine whether it might instead mediate the interaction between the MutLα complex (composed of hMLH1 and hPMS2, ref. 12) and the MutSα complex (composed of MSH2 and GTBP, ref. 4). Because previous studies have demonstrated that MSH2 and the MutLα components do not associate in solution (28), we were unable to assay for direct hPMS2-134:MutSα interaction. We therefore used a different approach to address this issue, and attempted to complement nuclear extracts from the various SH cell lines with MutSα or MutLα. If the truncated protein present in the PMS2-134 expressing SH cells was binding to MutSα and lowering its effective concentration in the extract, then adding intact MutSα should rescue the MMR defect in such extracts. Purified MutSα added to such extracts had no effect (FIG. 6). In contrast, addition of intact MutLα to the extract completely restored directional repair to the extracts from PMS2-134 cells (FIG. 6).
The results described above lead to several conclusions. First, expression of the amino-terminus of hPMS2 results in an increase in microsattelite instability, consistent with a replication error (RER) phenotype. That this elevated microsattelite instability is due to MMR deficiency was proven by evaluation of extracts from stably transduced cells. Interestingly, the expression of PMS2-134 resulted in a polar defect in MMR, which was only observed using heteroduplexes designed to test repair from the 5' direction (no significant defect in repair from the 3' direction was observed in the same extracts). Interestingly, cells deficient in hMLH1 also have a polar defect in MMR, but in this case preferentially affecting repair from the 3' direction (5). It is known from previous studies in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes that the separate enzymatic components mediate repair from the two different directions. Our results, in combination with those of Drummond et al., strongly suggest a model in which 5' repair is primarily dependent on hPMS2 while 3' repair is primarily dependent on hMLH1. It is easy to envision how the dimeric complex between PMS2 and MLH1 might set up this directionality. The combined results also demonstrate that a defect in directional MMR is sufficient to produce a RER+ phenotype.
We anticipated that the dominant negative function of the PMS2-134 polypeptide resulted from its binding to MLH1 and consequent inhibition of MutLα function. This hypothesis was based in part on the fact that the most highly conserved domain of the PMS2 gene is located in its amino terminus, and the only known biochemical partner for PMS2 is MLH1. Our binding studies revealed, however, that the carboxyl terminus of PMS2, rather than the highly conserved amino terminus, actually mediated binding to MLH1. This result is consistent with those recently obtained in S. cerevisciae, in which the MLH1 -interacting domain of PMS1 (the yeast homolog of human PMS2) was localized to its carboxyl-terminus (23). Our add-back experiments additionally showed that the hPMS2-134 mutant was not likely to mediate an interaction with the MutSα complex (FIG. 6). The best explanation at present to explain the various observations made here is that the hPMS2-134 polypeptide does not inhibit the initial steps in MMR, but rather interacts with and inhibits a downstream component of the pathway, perhaps a nuclease required for repair from the 5' direction.
The demonstration that the hPMS2-134 mutation can confer a dominant negative MMR defect to transfected cells helps to explain the phenotype of the kindred in which this mutant was discovered. Three individuals from this kindred were found to carry the mutation, a father and his two children. Both children exhibited microsattelite instability in their normal tissues and both developed tumors at an early age, while the father had no evidence of microsattelite instability in his normal cells and was completely healthy at age 35. The only difference known to us with respect to the MMR genes in this family is that the father's mutant allele was expressed at lower levels than the wild-type allele as assessed by sequencing of reverse transcriptase-PCR products of RNA from lymphocytes. The children expressed both alleles at approximately equal levels (Parsons et al. and unpublished observations). We suspect that the dominant negative attribute of the hPMS2-134 mutant will only be manifest when it is present at sufficient concentrations (at least equimolar), thus explaining the absence of MMR deficiency in the father. The reason for the differential expression of the hPMS2-134 allele in this kindred is not clear, though imprinting is a possibility. Hopefully, the ascertainment of additional, larger kindreds with such mutations will facilitate the investigation of this issue.
1. Baker S. M., Bronner, C. E., Zhang, L., Plug, A. W., Robatez, M., Warren, G., Elliott, E. A., Yu, J., Ashley, T., Arnheim, N., Bradley, N., Flavell, R. A., and Liskay, R. M. 1995. Male defective in the DNA mismatch repair gene PMS2 exhibit abnormal chromosome synapsis in meiosis. Cell 82:309-319.
2. Bronner, C. E., Baker, S. M., Morrison, P. T., Warren, G., Smith, L. G., Lescoe, M. K., Kane, M., Earabino, C., Lipford, J., Lindblom, A., Tannergard, P., Bollag, R. J., Godwin, A., R., Ward, D. C., Nordenskjold, M., Fishel, R., Kolodner, R., and Liskay, R. M. 1994. Mutation in the DNA mismatch repair gene homologue hMLH1 is associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. Nature 368:258-261.
3. de Wind N., Dekker, M., Berns, A., Radman, M., and Riele, H. T. 1995. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell 82:321-300.
4. Drummond, J. T., Li, G. M., Longley, M. J., and Modrich, P. 1995. Isolation of an hMSH2-p160 heterodimer that restores mismatch repair to tumor cells. Science 268:1909-1912.
5. Drummond, J. T., Anthoney, A., Brown, R., and Modrich, P. 1996. Cisplatin and adriamycin resistance are associated with MutLα and mismatch repair deficiency in an ovarian tumor cell line. J.Biol.Chem. 271:9645-19648.
6. Edelmann, W., Cohen, P. E., Kane, M., Lau, K., Morrow, B., Bennett, S., Umar, A., Kunkel, T., Cattoretti, G., Chagnatti, R., Pollard, J. W., Kolodner, R. D., and Kucherlapati, R. 1996. Meiotic pachytene arrest in MLH1-deficient mice. Cell 85:1125-1134.
7. Fishel, R., Lescoe, M., Rao, M. R. S., Copeland, N. J., Jenkins, N. A., Garber, J., Kane, M., and Kolodner, R. 1993. The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cell 7:1027-1038.
8. Green, S., Issemann, I., and Sheer, E. 1988. A versatile in vivo eucaryotic expression vector for protein engineering. Nuc. Acid Res. 16:369.
9. Hamilton, S. R., Liu, B., Parsons, R., E., Papadopoulos, N., Jen, J., Powell,, S. M., Krush, A. J., Berk, T., Cohen, Z., tetu, B., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. 1995. The molecular basis of Turcot's syndrome. N. Eng. J. Med. 332:839-847.
10. Holmes, J., Clark, S., and Modrich, P. Strand specific mismatch correction in nuclear extracts of human and Drosophila melanogaster cell lines. (1990). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:5837-5841.
11. Leach, F. S., Nicolaides, N. C, Papadopoulos, N., Liu, B., Jen, J., Parsons, R., Peltomaki, P., Sistonen, P., Aaltonen, L. A., Nystrom-Lahti, M., Guan, X. Y., Zhang, J., Meltzer, P. S., Yu, J. W., Kao, F. T., Chen, D. J., Cerosaletti, K. M., Fournier, R. E. K., Todd, S., Lewis, T., Leach R. J., Naylor, S. L., Weissenbach, J., Mecklin, J. P., Jarvinen, J. A., Petersen, G. M., Hamilton, S. R., Green, J., Jass, J., Watson, P., Lynch, H. T., Trent, J. M., de la Chapelle, A., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. 1993. Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Cell 75:1215-1225.
12. Li, G.-M., and Modrich, P. 1995. Restoration of mismatch repair to nuclear extracts of H6 colorectal tumor cells by a heterodimer of human mutL homologs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:1950-1954.
13. Liu, B., Parsons, R., Papadopoulos, N., Nicolaides, N. C., Lynch, H. T., Watson, P., Jass, J. R., Dunlop, M., Wyllie, A., Peltomaki, P., de la Chapelle, A., Hamilton, S. R., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. 1996. Analysis of mismatch repair genes in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer patients. Nat. Med. 2:169-174.
14. Modrich, P. 1994. Mismatch repair, genetic stability, and cancer. Science 266:1959-1960.
15. Nicolaides, N. C., Gualdi, R., Casadevall, C., Manzella, L., and Calabretta, B. 1991. Positive autoregulation of c-myb expression via MYB binding in the 5' flanking region of the human c-myb gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6166-6176.
16. Nicolaides, N. C., Correa, I., Casadevall, C., Travali, S., Soprano, K. J., and Calabretta, B. 1992. The Jun family members, c-JUN and JUND, transactivate the human c-myb promoter via an Apl like element. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19665-19672.
17. Nicolaides, N. C., Papadopoulos, N., Liu, B., Wei, Y. F., Carter, K. C., Ruben, S. M., Rosen, C. A, Haseltine, W. A., Fleischmann, R. D., Fraser, C. M., Adams, M. D., Venter, C. J., Dunlop, M. G., Hamilton, S. R., Petersen, G. M., de la Chapelle, A., Vogelstein, B., and kinzler, K. W. 1994. Mutations of two PMS homologs in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Nature 371:75-80.
18. Nicolaides N. C., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. 1995. Analysis of the 5' region of PMS2 reveals heterogenous transcripts and a novel overlapping gene. Genomics 29:329-334.
19. Nicolaides, N. C., Carter, K. C., Shell, B. K., Papadopoulos, N., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. 1995. Genomic organization of the human PMS2 gene family. Genomics 30:195-206.
20. Nicolaides, N. C., Palombo, F., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., and Jiricny, J. 1996. Molecular cloning of the N-terminus of GTBP. Genomics 31:395-397.
21. Palombo, F., Hughes, M., Jiricny, J., Truong, O., Hsuan, J. 1994. Mismatch repair and cancer. Nature 36:417.
22. Palombo, F., Gallinari, P., Iaccarino, I., Lettieri, T., Hughes, M. A., Truong, O., Hsuan, J. J., and Jiricny, J. 1995. GTBP, a 160-kilodalton protein essential for mismatch-binding activity in human cells. Science 268:1912-1914.
23. Pang, Q., Prolla, T. A., and Liskay, R. M. 1997. Functional domains of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mlhlp and Pmslp DNA mismatch repair proteins and their relevance to human hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-associated mutations. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4465-4473.
24. Papadopoulos, N., Nicolaides, N. C., Wei, Y. F., Carter, K. C., Ruben, S. M., Rosen, C. A., Haseltine, W. A., Fleischmann, R. D., Fraser, C. M., Adams, M. D., Venter, C. J., Dunlop, M. G., Hamilton, S. R., Petersen, G. M., de la Chapelle, A., Vogelstein, B., and kinzler, K. W. 1994. Mutation of a mutL homolog is associated with hereditary colon cancer. Science 263:1625-1629.
25. Parsons, R., Li, G. M., Longley, M. J., Fang, W. H., Papadopolous, N., Jen, J., de la Chapelle, A., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., and Modrich, P. 1993. Hypermutability and mismatch repair deficiency in RER+ tumor cells. Cell 75:1227-1236.
26. Parsons, R., Li, G. M., Longley, M., Modrich, P., Liu, B., Berk, T., Hamilton, S. R., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. 1995. Mismatch repair deficiency in phenotypically normal human cells. Science 268:738-740.
27. Perucho, M. 1996. Cancer of the microsattelite mutator phenotype. Biol Chem. 377:675-684.
28. Prolla, T. A, Pang, Q., Alani, E., Kolodner, R. A, and Liskay, R. M. 1994. MLH1, PMS1, and MSH2 Interaction during the initiation of DNA mismatch repair in yeast. Science 264:1091-1093.
29. Strand, M., Prolla, T. A., Liskay, R. M., and Petes, T. D. Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. 1993. Nature 365:274-276.
30. Su, S. S., Lahue, R. S., Au, K. G., and Modrich, P. 1988. Mispair specificity of methyl directed DNA mismatch corrections in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 263:6829-6835.
__________________________________________________________________________# SEQUENCE LISTING - - - - (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: - - (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 2 - - - - (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1: - - (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 2771 base - #pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear - - (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: cDNA - - (ix) FEATURE: (A) NAME/KEY: Coding Se - #quence (B) LOCATION: 25...2610 (D) OTHER INFORMATION: - - (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:1: - - CGAGGCGGAT CGGGTGTTGC ATCC ATG GAG CGA GCT GAG A - #GC TCG AGT ACA 51 - # Met Glu Arg Ala Glu - #Ser Ser Ser Thr - # 1 - # 5 - - GAA CCT GCT AAG GCC ATC AAA CCT ATT GAT CG - #G AAG TCA GTC CAT CAG 99 Glu Pro Ala Lys Ala Ile Lys Pro Ile Asp Ar - #g Lys Ser Val His Gln 10 - #15 - #20 - #25 - - ATT TGC TCT GGG CAG GTG GTA CTG AGT CTA AG - #C ACT GCG GTA AAG GAG147 Ile Cys Ser Gly Gln Val Val Leu Ser Leu Se - #r Thr Ala Val Lys Glu 30 - # 35 - # 40 - - TTA GTA GAA AAC AGT CTG GAT GCT GGT GCC AC - #T AAT ATT GAT CTA AAG195 Leu Val Glu Asn Ser Leu Asp Ala Gly Ala Th - #r Asn Ile Asp Leu Lys 45 - # 50 - # 55 - - CTT AAG GAC TAT GGA GTG GAT CTT ATT GAA GT - #T TCA GAC AAT GGA TGT243 Leu Lys Asp Tyr Gly Val Asp Leu Ile Glu Va - #l Ser Asp Asn Gly Cys 60 - # 65 - # 70 - - GGG GTA GAA GAA GAA AAC TTC GAA GGC TTA AC - #T CTG AAA CAT CAC ACA291 Gly Val Glu Glu Glu Asn Phe Glu Gly Leu Th - #r Leu Lys His His Thr75 - # 80 - # 85 - - TCT AAG ATT CAA GAG TTT GCC GAC CTA ACT CA - #G GTT GAA ACT TTT GGC339 Ser Lys Ile Gln Glu Phe Ala Asp Leu Thr Gl - #n Val Glu Thr Phe Gly 90 - #95 - #100 - #105 - - TTT CGG GGG GAA GCT CTG AGC TCA CTT TGT GC - #A CTG AGC GAT GTC ACC387 Phe Arg Gly Glu Ala Leu Ser Ser Leu Cys Al - #a Leu Ser Asp Val Thr 110 - # 115 - # 120 - - ATT TCT ACC TGC CAC GCA TCG GCG AAG GTT GG - #A ACT CGA CTG ATG TTT435 Ile Ser Thr Cys His Ala Ser Ala Lys Val Gl - #y Thr Arg Leu Met Phe 125 - # 130 - # 135 - - GAT CAC AAT GGG AAA ATT ATC CAG AAA ACC CC - #C TAC CCC CGC CCC AGA483 Asp His Asn Gly Lys Ile Ile Gln Lys Thr Pr - #o Tyr Pro Arg Pro Arg 140 - # 145 - # 150 - - GGG ACC ACA GTC AGC GTG CAG CAG TTA TTT TC - #C ACA CTA CCT GTG CGC531 Gly Thr Thr Val Ser Val Gln Gln Leu Phe Se - #r Thr Leu Pro Val Arg155 - # 160 - # 165 - - CAT AAG GAA TTT CAA AGG AAT ATT AAG AAG GA - #G TAT GCC AAA ATG GTC579 His Lys Glu Phe Gln Arg Asn Ile Lys Lys Gl - #u Tyr Ala Lys Met Val 170 1 - #75 1 - #80 1 -#85 - - CAG GTC TTA CAT GCA TAC TGT ATC ATT TCA GC - #A GGC ATC CGT GTAAGT 627 Gln Val Leu His Ala Tyr Cys Ile Ile Ser Al - #a Gly Ile Arg Val Ser 190 - # 195 - # 200 - - TGC ACC AAT CAG CTT GGA CAA GGA AAA CGA CA - #G CCT GTG GTA TGC ACA675 Cys Thr Asn Gln Leu Gly Gln Gly Lys Arg Gl - #n Pro Val Val Cys Thr 205 - # 210 - # 215 - - GGT GGA AGC CCC AGC ATA AAG GAA AAT ATC GG - #C TCT GTG TTT GGG CAG723 Gly Gly Ser Pro Ser Ile Lys Glu Asn Ile Gl - #y Ser Val Phe Gly Gln 220 - # 225 - # 230 - - AAG CAG TTG CAA AGC CTC ATT CCT TTT GTT CA - #G CTG CCC CCT AGT GAC771 Lys Gln Leu Gln Ser Leu Ile Pro Phe Val Gl - #n Leu Pro Pro Ser Asp235 - # 240 - # 245 - - TCC GTG TGT GAA GAG TAC GGT TTG AGC TGT TC - #G GAT GCT CTG CAT AAT819 Ser Val Cys Glu Glu Tyr Gly Leu Ser Cys Se - #r Asp Ala Leu His Asn 250 2 - #55 2 - #60 2 -#65 - - CTT TTT TAC ATC TCA GGT TTC ATT TCA CAA TG - #C ACG CAT GGA GTTGGA 867 Leu Phe Tyr Ile Ser Gly Phe Ile Ser Gln Cy - #s Thr His Gly Val Gly 270 - # 275 - # 280 - - AGG AGT TCA ACA GAC AGA CAG TTT TTC TTT AT - #C AAC CGG CGG CCT TGT915 Arg Ser Ser Thr Asp Arg Gln Phe Phe Phe Il - #e Asn Arg Arg Pro Cys 285 - # 290 - # 295 - - GAC CCA GCA AAG GTC TGC AGA CTC GTG AAT GA - #G GTC TAC CAC ATG TAT963 Asp Pro Ala Lys Val Cys Arg Leu Val Asn Gl - #u Val Tyr His Met Tyr 300 - # 305 - # 310 - - AAT CGA CAC CAG TAT CCA TTT GTT GTT CTT AA - #C ATT TCT GTT GAT TCA 1011 Asn Arg His Gln Tyr Pro Phe Val Val Leu As - #n Ile Ser Val Asp Ser315 - # 320 - # 325 - - GAA TGC GTT GAT ATC AAT GTT ACT CCA GAT AA - #A AGG CAA ATT TTG CTA 1059 Glu Cys Val Asp Ile Asn Val Thr Pro Asp Ly - #s Arg Gln Ile Leu Leu 330 3 - #35 3 - #40 3 -#45 - - CAA GAG GAA AAG CTT TTG TTG GCA GTT TTA AA - #G ACC TCT TTG ATAGGA 1107 Gln Glu Glu Lys Leu Leu Leu Ala Val Leu Ly - #s Thr Ser Leu Ile Gly 350 - # 355 - # 360 - - ATG TTT GAT AGT GAT GTC AAC AAG CTA AAT GT - #C AGT CAG CAG CCA CTG 1155 Met Phe Asp Ser Asp Val Asn Lys Leu Asn Va - #l Ser Gln Gln Pro Leu 365 - # 370 - # 375 - - CTG GAT GTT GAA GGT AAC TTA ATA AAA ATG CA - #T GCA GCG GAT TTG GAA 1203 Leu Asp Val Glu Gly Asn Leu Ile Lys Met Hi - #s Ala Ala Asp Leu Glu 380 - # 385 - # 390 - - AAG CCC ATG GTA GAA AAG CAG GAT CAA TCC CC - #T TCA TTA AGG ACT GGA 1251 Lys Pro Met Val Glu Lys Gln Asp Gln Ser Pr - #o Ser Leu Arg Thr Gly395 - # 400 - # 405 - - GAA GAA AAA AAA GAC GTG TCC ATT TCC AGA CT - #G CGA GAG GCC TTT TCT 1299 Glu Glu Lys Lys Asp Val Ser Ile Ser Arg Le - #u Arg Glu Ala Phe Ser 410 4 - #15 4 - #20 4 -#25 - - CTT CGT CAC ACA ACA GAG AAC AAG CCT CAC AG - #C CCA AAG ACT CCAGAA 1347 Leu Arg His Thr Thr Glu Asn Lys Pro His Se - #r Pro Lys Thr Pro Glu 430 - # 435 - # 440 - - CCA AGA AGG AGC CCT CTA GGA CAG AAA AGG GG - #T ATG CTG TCT TCT AGC 1395 Pro Arg Arg Ser Pro Leu Gly Gln Lys Arg Gl - #y Met Leu Ser Ser Ser 445 - # 450 - # 455 - - ACT TCA GGT GCC ATC TCT GAC AAA GGC GTC CT - #G AGA CCT CAG AAA GAG 1443 Thr Ser Gly Ala Ile Ser Asp Lys Gly Val Le - #u Arg Pro Gln Lys Glu 460 - # 465 - # 470 - - GCA GTG AGT TCC AGT CAC GGA CCC AGT GAC CC - #T ACG GAC AGA GCG GAG 1491 Ala Val Ser Ser Ser His Gly Pro Ser Asp Pr - #o Thr Asp Arg Ala Glu475 - # 480 - # 485 - - GTG GAG AAG GAC TCG GGG CAC GGC AGC ACT TC - #C GTG GAT TCT GAG GGG 1539 Val Glu Lys Asp Ser Gly His Gly Ser Thr Se - #r Val Asp Ser Glu Gly 490 4 - #95 5 - #00 5 -#05 - - TTC AGC ATC CCA GAC ACG GGC AGT CAC TGC AG - #C AGC GAG TAT GCGGCC 1587 Phe Ser Ile Pro Asp Thr Gly Ser His Cys Se - #r Ser Glu Tyr Ala Ala 510 - # 515 - # 520 - - AGC TCC CCA GGG GAC AGG GGC TCG CAG GAA CA - #T GTG GAC TCT CAG GAG 1635 Ser Ser Pro Gly Asp Arg Gly Ser Gln Glu Hi - #s Val Asp Ser Gln Glu 525 - # 530 - # 535 - - AAA GCG CCT GAA ACT GAC GAC TCT TTT TCA GA - #T GTG GAC TGC CAT TCA 1683 Lys Ala Pro Glu Thr Asp Asp Ser Phe Ser As - #p Val Asp Cys His Ser 540 - # 545 - # 550 - - AAC CAG GAA GAT ACC GGA TGT AAA TTT CGA GT - #T TTG CCT CAG CCA ACT 1731 Asn Gln Glu Asp Thr Gly Cys Lys Phe Arg Va - #l Leu Pro Gln Pro Thr555 - # 560 - # 565 - - AAT CTC GCA ACC CCA AAC ACA AAG CGT TTT AA - #A AAA GAA GAA ATT CTT 1779 Asn Leu Ala Thr Pro Asn Thr Lys Arg Phe Ly - #s Lys Glu Glu Ile Leu 570 5 - #75 5 - #80 5 -#85 - - TCC AGT TCT GAC ATT TGT CAA AAG TTA GTA AA - #T ACT CAG GAC ATGTCA 1827 Ser Ser Ser Asp Ile Cys Gln Lys Leu Val As - #n Thr Gln Asp Met Ser 590 - # 595 - # 600 - - GCC TCT CAG GTT GAT GTA GCT GTG AAA ATT AA - #T AAG AAA GTT GTG CCC 1875 Ala Ser Gln Val Asp Val Ala Val Lys Ile As - #n Lys Lys Val Val Pro 605 - # 610 - # 615 - - CTG GAC TTT TCT ATG AGT TCT TTA GCT AAA CG - #A ATA AAG CAG TTA CAT 1923 Leu Asp Phe Ser Met Ser Ser Leu Ala Lys Ar - #g Ile Lys Gln Leu His 620 - # 625 - # 630 - - CAT GAA GCA CAG CAA AGT GAA GGG GAA CAG AA - #T TAC AGG AAG TTT AGG 1971 His Glu Ala Gln Gln Ser Glu Gly Glu Gln As - #n Tyr Arg Lys Phe Arg635 - # 640 - # 645 - - GCA AAG ATT TGT CCT GGA GAA AAT CAA GCA GC - #C GAA GAT GAA CTA AGA 2019 Ala Lys Ile Cys Pro Gly Glu Asn Gln Ala Al - #a Glu Asp Glu Leu Arg 650 6 - #55 6 - #60 6 -#65 - - AAA GAG ATA AGT AAA ACG ATG TTT GCA GAA AT - #G GAA ATC ATT GGTCAG 2067 Lys Glu Ile Ser Lys Thr Met Phe Ala Glu Me - #t Glu Ile Ile Gly Gln 670 - # 675 - # 680 - - TTT AAC CTG GGA TTT ATA ATA ACC AAA CTG AA - #T GAG GAT ATC TTC ATA 2115 Phe Asn Leu Gly Phe Ile Ile Thr Lys Leu As - #n Glu Asp Ile Phe Ile 685 - # 690 - # 695 - - GTG GAC CAG CAT GCC ACG GAC GAG AAG TAT AA - #C TTC GAG ATG CTG CAG 2163 Val Asp Gln His Ala Thr Asp Glu Lys Tyr As - #n Phe Glu Met Leu Gln 700 - # 705 - # 710 - - CAG CAC ACC GTG CTC CAG GGG CAG AGG CTC AT - #A GCA CCT CAG ACT CTC 2211 Gln His Thr Val Leu Gln Gly Gln Arg Leu Il - #e Ala Pro Gln Thr Leu715 - # 720 - # 725 - - AAC TTA ACT GCT GTT AAT GAA GCT GTT CTG AT - #A GAA AAT CTG GAA ATA 2259 Asn Leu Thr Ala Val Asn Glu Ala Val Leu Il - #e Glu Asn Leu Glu Ile 730 7 - #35 7 - #40 7 -#45 - - TTT AGA AAG AAT GGC TTT GAT TTT GTT ATC GA - #T GAA AAT GCT CCAGTC 2307 Phe Arg Lys Asn Gly Phe Asp Phe Val Ile As - #p Glu Asn Ala Pro Val 750 - # 755 - # 760 - - ACT GAA AGG GCT AAA CTG ATT TCC TTG CCA AC - #T AGT AAA AAC TGG ACC 2355 Thr Glu Arg Ala Lys Leu Ile Ser Leu Pro Th - #r Ser Lys Asn Trp Thr 765 - # 770 - # 775 - - TTC GGA CCC CAG GAC GTC GAT GAA CTG ATC TT - #C ATG CTG AGC GAC AGC 2403 Phe Gly Pro Gln Asp Val Asp Glu Leu Ile Ph - #e Met Leu Ser Asp Ser 780 - # 785 - # 790 - - CCT GGG GTC ATG TGC CGG CCT TCC CGA GTC AA - #G CAG ATG TTT GCC TCC 2451 Pro Gly Val Met Cys Arg Pro Ser Arg Val Ly - #s Gln Met Phe Ala Ser795 - # 800 - # 805 - - AGA GCC TGC CGG AAG TCG GTG ATG ATT GGG AC - #T GCT CTT AAC ACA AGC 2499 Arg Ala Cys Arg Lys Ser Val Met Ile Gly Th - #r Ala Leu Asn Thr Ser 810 8 - #15 8 - #20 8 -#25 - - GAG ATG AAG AAA CTG ATC ACC CAC ATG GGG GA - #G ATG GAC CAC CCCTGG 2547 Glu Met Lys Lys Leu Ile Thr His Met Gly Gl - #u Met Asp His Pro Trp 830 - # 835 - # 840 - - AAC TGT CCC CAT GGA AGG CCA ACC ATG AGA CA - #C ATC GCC AAC CTG GGT 2595 Asn Cys Pro His Gly Arg Pro Thr Met Arg Hi - #s Ile Ala Asn Leu Gly 845 - # 850 - # 855 - - GTC ATT TCT CAG AAC TGACCGTAGT CACTGTATGG AATAATTGG - #T TTTATCGCAGA 2651 Val Ile Ser Gln Asn 860 - - TTTTTATGTT TTGAAAGACA GAGTCTTCAC TAACCTTTTT TGTTTTAAAA TG -#AAACCTGC 2711 - - TACTTAAAAA AAATACACAT CACACCCATT TAAAAGTGAT CTTGAGAACC TT -#TTCAAACC 2771 - - - - (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: - - (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 862 amino - #acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear - - (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein - - (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal - - (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2: - - Met Glu Arg Ala Glu Ser Ser Ser Thr Glu Pr - #o Ala Lys Ala IleLys 1 5 - # 10 - # 15 - - Pro Ile Asp Arg Lys Ser Val His Gln Ile Cy - #s Ser Gly Gln Val Val 20 - # 25 - # 30 - - Leu Ser Leu Ser Thr Ala Val Lys Glu Leu Va - #l Glu Asn Ser Leu Asp 35 - # 40 - # 45 - - Ala Gly Ala Thr Asn Ile Asp Leu Lys Leu Ly - #s Asp Tyr Gly Val Asp50 - # 55 - # 60 - - Leu Ile Glu Val Ser Asp Asn Gly Cys Gly Va - #l Glu Glu Glu Asn Phe 65 - #70 - #75 - #80 - - Glu Gly Leu Thr Leu Lys His His Thr Ser Ly - #s Ile Gln Glu Phe Ala 85 - # 90 - # 95 - - Asp Leu Thr Gln Val Glu Thr Phe Gly Phe Ar - #g Gly Glu Ala Leu Ser 100 - # 105 - # 110 - - Ser Leu Cys Ala Leu Ser Asp Val Thr Ile Se - #r Thr Cys His Ala Ser 115 - # 120 - # 125 - - Ala Lys Val Gly Thr Arg Leu Met Phe Asp Hi - #s Asn Gly Lys Ile Ile130 - # 135 - # 140 - - Gln Lys Thr Pro Tyr Pro Arg Pro Arg Gly Th - #r Thr Val Ser Val Gln 145 1 - #50 1 - #55 1 -#60 - - Gln Leu Phe Ser Thr Leu Pro Val Arg His Ly - #s Glu Phe Gln ArgAsn 165 - # 170 - # 175 - - Ile Lys Lys Glu Tyr Ala Lys Met Val Gln Va - #l Leu His Ala Tyr Cys 180 - # 185 - # 190 - - Ile Ile Ser Ala Gly Ile Arg Val Ser Cys Th - #r Asn Gln Leu Gly Gln 195 - # 200 - # 205 - - Gly Lys Arg Gln Pro Val Val Cys Thr Gly Gl - #y Ser Pro Ser Ile Lys210 - # 215 - # 220 - - Glu Asn Ile Gly Ser Val Phe Gly Gln Lys Gl - #n Leu Gln Ser Leu Ile 225 2 - #30 2 - #35 2 -#40 - - Pro Phe Val Gln Leu Pro Pro Ser Asp Ser Va - #l Cys Glu Glu TyrGly 245 - # 250 - # 255 - - Leu Ser Cys Ser Asp Ala Leu His Asn Leu Ph - #e Tyr Ile Ser Gly Phe 260 - # 265 - # 270 - - Ile Ser Gln Cys Thr His Gly Val Gly Arg Se - #r Ser Thr Asp Arg Gln 275 - # 280 - # 285 - - Phe Phe Phe Ile Asn Arg Arg Pro Cys Asp Pr - #o Ala Lys Val Cys Arg290 - # 295 - # 300 - - Leu Val Asn Glu Val Tyr His Met Tyr Asn Ar - #g His Gln Tyr Pro Phe 305 3 - #10 3 - #15 3 -#20 - - Val Val Leu Asn Ile Ser Val Asp Ser Glu Cy - #s Val Asp Ile AsnVal 325 - # 330 - # 335 - - Thr Pro Asp Lys Arg Gln Ile Leu Leu Gln Gl - #u Glu Lys Leu Leu Leu 340 - # 345 - # 350 - - Ala Val Leu Lys Thr Ser Leu Ile Gly Met Ph - #e Asp Ser Asp Val Asn 355 - # 360 - # 365 - - Lys Leu Asn Val Ser Gln Gln Pro Leu Leu As - #p Val Glu Gly Asn Leu370 - # 375 - # 380 - - Ile Lys Met His Ala Ala Asp Leu Glu Lys Pr - #o Met Val Glu Lys Gln 385 3 - #90 3 - #95 4 -#00 - - Asp Gln Ser Pro Ser Leu Arg Thr Gly Glu Gl - #u Lys Lys Asp ValSer 405 - # 410 - # 415 - - Ile Ser Arg Leu Arg Glu Ala Phe Ser Leu Ar - #g His Thr Thr Glu Asn 420 - # 425 - # 430 - - Lys Pro His Ser Pro Lys Thr Pro Glu Pro Ar - #g Arg Ser Pro Leu Gly 435 - # 440 - # 445 - - Gln Lys Arg Gly Met Leu Ser Ser Ser Thr Se - #r Gly Ala Ile Ser Asp450 - # 455 - # 460 - - Lys Gly Val Leu Arg Pro Gln Lys Glu Ala Va - #l Ser Ser Ser His Gly 465 4 - #70 4 - #75 4 -#80 - - Pro Ser Asp Pro Thr Asp Arg Ala Glu Val Gl - #u Lys Asp Ser GlyHis 485 - # 490 - # 495 - - Gly Ser Thr Ser Val Asp Ser Glu Gly Phe Se - #r Ile Pro Asp Thr Gly 500 - # 505 - # 510 - - Ser His Cys Ser Ser Glu Tyr Ala Ala Ser Se - #r Pro Gly Asp Arg Gly 515 - # 520 - # 525 - - Ser Gln Glu His Val Asp Ser Gln Glu Lys Al - #a Pro Glu Thr Asp Asp530 - # 535 - # 540 - - Ser Phe Ser Asp Val Asp Cys His Ser Asn Gl - #n Glu Asp Thr Gly Cys 545 5 - #50 5 - #55 5 -#60 - - Lys Phe Arg Val Leu Pro Gln Pro Thr Asn Le - #u Ala Thr Pro AsnThr 565 - # 570 - # 575 - - Lys Arg Phe Lys Lys Glu Glu Ile Leu Ser Se - #r Ser Asp Ile Cys Gln 580 - # 585 - # 590 - - Lys Leu Val Asn Thr Gln Asp Met Ser Ala Se - #r Gln Val Asp Val Ala 595 - # 600 - # 605 - - Val Lys Ile Asn Lys Lys Val Val Pro Leu As - #p Phe Ser Met Ser Ser610 - # 615 - # 620 - - Leu Ala Lys Arg Ile Lys Gln Leu His His Gl - #u Ala Gln Gln Ser Glu 625 6 - #30 6 - #35 6 -#40 - - Gly Glu Gln Asn Tyr Arg Lys Phe Arg Ala Ly - #s Ile Cys Pro GlyGlu 645 - # 650 - # 655 - - Asn Gln Ala Ala Glu Asp Glu Leu Arg Lys Gl - #u Ile Ser Lys Thr Met 660 - # 665 - # 670 - - Phe Ala Glu Met Glu Ile Ile Gly Gln Phe As - #n Leu Gly Phe Ile Ile 675 - # 680 - # 685 - - Thr Lys Leu Asn Glu Asp Ile Phe Ile Val As - #p Gln His Ala Thr Asp690 - # 695 - # 700 - - Glu Lys Tyr Asn Phe Glu Met Leu Gln Gln Hi - #s Thr Val Leu Gln Gly 705 7 - #10 7 - #15 7 -#20 - - Gln Arg Leu Ile Ala Pro Gln Thr Leu Asn Le - #u Thr Ala Val AsnGlu 725 - # 730 - # 735 - - Ala Val Leu Ile Glu Asn Leu Glu Ile Phe Ar - #g Lys Asn Gly Phe Asp 740 - # 745 - # 750 - - Phe Val Ile Asp Glu Asn Ala Pro Val Thr Gl - #u Arg Ala Lys Leu Ile 755 - # 760 - # 765 - - Ser Leu Pro Thr Ser Lys Asn Trp Thr Phe Gl - #y Pro Gln Asp Val Asp770 - # 775 - # 780 - - Glu Leu Ile Phe Met Leu Ser Asp Ser Pro Gl - #y Val Met Cys Arg Pro 785 7 - #90 7 - #95 8 -#00 - - Ser Arg Val Lys Gln Met Phe Ala Ser Arg Al - #a Cys Arg Lys SerVal 805 - # 810 - # 815 - - Met Ile Gly Thr Ala Leu Asn Thr Ser Glu Me - #t Lys Lys Leu Ile Thr 820 - # 825 - # 830 - - His Met Gly Glu Met Asp His Pro Trp Asn Cy - #s Pro His Gly Arg Pro 835 - # 840 - # 845 - - Thr Met Arg His Ile Ala Asn Leu Gly Val Il - #e Ser Gln Asn850 - # 855 - # 860__________________________________________________________________________