Your problem is understanding what it means when you said<quoted text>
Whether you are sorry or not there is a difference between not understanding how an event happened and a paradox.
1. a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a possible truth.
2. a self-contradictory and false proposition.
3. any person, thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature.
4. an opinion or statement contrary to commonly accepted opinion
There is nothing contradictory, false or absurd and therefore not a paradox, The logic of mathematics used to theorise the event contradict nothing. However you would no doubt have been correct until Dr Param Singh invented the mathematics that resolved the problems of infinities. Perhaps you are out of date or perhaps you use the wrong word? I dont know, I dont do too well at reading minds.
Human knowledge increases, that is the nature of the human mind and of course the reason for science. Because there is a limit now does not mean that limit will stand next Thursday. Only in the last couple of years has the current limit been pushed back to 10^-34 of a second after the event.
"the very laws that enable us to understand this universe did not exist" That should be worded, "The very laws that govern this universe did not exist" The problem is a infinitesimal turned infinite if you fail to see the paradox , the problem is yours.
Just as the cosmological argument has been waged for 4 thousand years, and in your arrogance and haughty reasoning will not change it from being the paradox it is. It is hardly been solved though our understanding greater yes, but the heart of this mystery will forever be shrouded in a impenetrable fog of absolutes that defy reason to explain.
Param Singh has hypothesis but like so much wonder it is but one possible explanation of many , in cosmology there are many flavors of possibility , but they only hold favor awhile till the next scheme is devised . But like all theory and hypothesis into before the beginning is nothing more than conjecture.
Else the cosmological argument would be no longer a topic and all the rage even here and now , within this very forum.
We you and I can only say the evidence leads us to think it was not a caused event, or better said caused by a uncaused causer of causers. We can go further saying it is possible that quantum fluctuations caused a potential difference in space/time/matter/energy and this was likely due to the nature of minute quantum perturbation, but it takes not away from mystery and paradox of the resulting infinite/infinitesimal.