Joined: Sep. 2006
So, uh... †
|At his discretion, the Editor-in-Chief can reject sponsorship of a peer for any reason, including inappropriate conflict of interest perceived or real.|
With no apologies to Behe, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it also ducks like a quack.
|The Editor-in-Chief can, at his discretion, solicit additional outside review of a paper outside of his field of expertise. In all matters of publication, the decision of the Editor-in-Chief is final and binding.|
Who edits the Editor-in-Chief, or can't we ask?
What's outside the outside review solicited outside of his field of expertise? (Moreover, what the hell is his expertise?) What came before this big slang? Are these unfair questions? †
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?
AtBC Poet Laureate
"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive
"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr