It would be nice if the label "truthers", as a disparaging type of name calling, wasn't employed by the "trusters".
The "beauty" of the official story narrative is that it apparently
presents the most believable and consistent narrative capable of explaining
all information and data according to the apparent
use of Occam's Razor.
Where it falls apart is under a close analysis of the events and phenomenon themselves within the context of a purely scientific approach to those
events, like the free fall time recorded during the onset of WTC7's destruction as but one example of many.
If anyone is curious or uncertain I recommend the documentary linked in my signature, all three parts and the full five hours worth, when you have the
time to give it the attention it deserves.
And as to the OS narrative, i encourage a deep study of the cell phone record, how it was covered up in the Moussaoui trial evidence presentation, as
well as the 9/11 Commission Report, along with an in depth analysis of the content and nature of all the calls from the alleged passengers on the four
planes to their loved ones, and in the case of flight attendant CeeCee Lyles recorded on an answering machine at the end of which, while fumbling with
phone she whispers.. "it's a frame", which can be located and heard at the wikipedia "flight 93" page.
This book covers those calls in fine detail, one by one
Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence
If the central narrative of the official story is proven false, as with the case of the cell phone record (given that such calls, when taken together
as a whole, cannot have been placed from the altitudes and speeds at which the aircraft were travelling when the calls were made), then indeed an
alternative hypothesis emerges involving events taking place both in the air, in the case of the south tower plane recorded travelling in perfect
control with deft maneuvering at 90 knots over it's Vd limit, which represents an airspeed for controlled flight for such an aircraft type without
precedent in the recorded history of aviation
, as well as simulated hijacking enactments taking place from the ground
under the pretext of
military exercises along with other "frames" or psychological pressure points to make sure that the participants stayed on script and did not say
certain things along the lines of "but don't worry because it's just an exercise". When this evidence is applied to the narrative for flight 93,
including the cell phone record for alleged passengers aboard that flight, as well as the pristine condition of their personal effects..
the only conclusion that can and must be drawn, is absolutely devastating, because like the destruction of the twin towers, which occurred to within 4
or 5 seconds of absolute free fall for both 110 story buildings, along with all the other evidence pointing away from a "progressive, pancaking
collapse" hypothesis and towards a precision engineered controlled demolition hypothesis, initiated from around the impact areas - it points a very
sturdy finger at what can only be called the crime of the century and a crime against humanity that is among the very worst in recorded history, when
seen and recognized as the false flag, "shock and awe" black-op psy-op that it really was.
On a long term basis, as the OS comes under increasing scrutiny and analysis by more and more people of every discipline and walk of life - that's
what remains as the alternate hypothesis, a murderous hoax
of far reaching implications capable of indicting the PTB and the perpetrators of
the crime itself, either during their lifetime in this generation or in absentia upon their passing off the scene.
There's just too much information and too much data which directly contradicts the OS narrative for it to hold up under the continual and accumulated
weight of objective, rational, scientific scrutiny and analysis, and so therefore history will rise up to condemn it (the official story, it's
narrative, and cover up) in unequivocal and incontrovertible terms.
edit on 23-1-2014 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)