So I was reading the Chronicle the other day and they were talking about P.Buc and how the Raiders wasent the right enviroment for him. How he had all the right physical skills to be a premier corner but was never able to put it all together. How he got an over inflated ego when labled showtime. How he got defensive when fans, coaches, and players made comments on his level of play. So what happens if he comes here and becomes great? How much of football is truely physical attributes? How much does charector, mental stamina, and the system that they play in, take part in shaping and creating the player they will become? How much is the coach, front office, owner, media, and fans, responsible for what kind of football player he becomes? What happens if P.Buc becomes great? Does it mean that the Raiders failed him? Or does it mean that the Houston system is better? Does it mean that if left in Oakland he was to have been labled a bust, doomed to be continualy posted over and over and over as a bust on every "who do you think is the biggest bust" thread?(Tony B. cause he never played a down) And if this is the case and P.Buc is great then what of all the other busts? The leafs, Mcguires, couch's, streets, dilfer's, smith's, howard's, george's? Could they have florished in other systems? If the Texans would have taken Harrington would we be thankful cause Carr is in Detroit fighting for a starting job? Somtimes it makes you wonder whether the player fails football or did football fail the player. Just a thought.