A bit off topic, but can someone explain to me why Walt Mossberg, one of the most well known tech reviewers, writing for one of the most well known papers, does his damn video reviews with a shitty webcam, with shitty lighting, at a shitty angles, with shitty framerates and shitty sound, in a ghetto looking room? He can't avoid a decent video camera, like all the other billion people that do their crappy youtube reviews that look a billion times better? I don't get it. The guy is a professional that reviews stuff for a professional outlet. Why can't he get some hald-decent equipment for his video reviews so they dont look like a blurry, garbled, ghetto mess? Can't the WSJ cover it? Its so embarrassing, I almost feel like donating him a decent camera.
Had to get that off my chest, after stopping a few seconds into the 3rd review Ive tried to watch this month because of the abysmal, unacceptably horrible quality.