No implementation for shlwapi.dll.0(StrRetToBufA)
dank at alumni.caltech.edu
Mon Feb 12 13:30:40 CST 2001
Francois Gouget wrote:
> But I'm not behind a modem. I'm behind a DSL so the above really
> doesn't matter much.
Ah, but you don't have a static IP address, I bet.
It's much easier to track back spam to a static IP address,
so those addresses are much safer from being spam sources.
It's those dynamic IP addresses that let spammers hide.
> It also seems to me that this leads to a system where dialup users
> are second rate internet citizens and have fewer rights than first rate
> citizens. So in this future if you're not an accredited corporation you
> would not have the right to connect to any computer but your ISP's
> servers which will then relay your traffic... for a fee, if they see
Well, sorry, but if you want to get rid of spam, we need to add some
primitive tracability features to the email system, and requiring a
static IP is part of that.
> ISPs have a lot of more important things to educate their users
> about. They could start with how to secure one's computer (or how to do
> masquerading ;-).
That's for darn sure.
More information about the wine-devel