"that's offensive to them."
This IS assuming that there is something offensive about GAY people, right? If the Pope is GAY, what's the harm? As long as he isn't a pedophile, right? But then, there are people who equate GAYS with being pedophiles. And there seem to be a disproportionate number of Catholic priests who are pedophiles. So I'm assuming, by the logic, that it's okay to be a pedophile, but not GAY? Or in even more screwy logic, since GAYS are pedophiles, then all those pedophile priests are GAY? Or is it the other way around, since the priests are GAY they must all be pedophiles? Doesn't that then mean that it is okay to be GAY since it is okay to be a pedophile?
Let me see if I have this right: Abortion is wrong because the Church says it is so, and pedophiles are okay, but GAYS, who tend to be pedophiles, are evil, whereas pedophiles are swept under the table, but because GAYAS cannot have children, they therefore cannot get abortions, therefore , they can't be bad, but by being pedophiles they are the harbingers of the end of all things abortion, while being impossibly GAY, which is bad, because GAYS are pedophiles, which automatically makes them good, and thereby equated with abortion, which is bad, and priests, having taken a vow of chastity, cannot possibly be pedophiles, and therefore cannot be GAY, and thereby having every possibility of having something to do with abortion, which cannot be instigated by GAYS, but very possibly be instigated by pedophiles, who cannot get an abortion. So all good. Makes sense.
My point is: it is just as offensive to imply there is anything at all wrong with being GAY. Why does no one defend GAY people here on BPL?
Edit: GREAT! So "GAY" is considered profanity (which is DISCRIMINATION here at BPL! Hello!!!!), but "pedophile" is perfectly okay to write?!?