Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Document txid functions.
> >> Please revert this change. It makes these functions far more prominent
> >> than is justified.
> > Have you looked at the output?
> Yes, I did. I don't like giving these function their own <sect1>
> heading --- if they deserve it, then why not every other little group of
> functions under System Information Functions and System Administration
> Functions too? I also find it entirely unreasonable to treat the
> datatype as a major datatype category.
> I thought the stuff was adequately documented already, which is why I
> suggest just reverting this.
OK, so how about removing just the "Query Function" column. I thought
the field descriptions where useful.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-11-05 16:35:36|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Document txid functions. |
|Previous:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2007-11-05 16:22:53|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Add a note about another issue that needs to be considered before|