You Can’t Manage What You Can’t MeasureWith all the hype in the media today it is difficult to weed through the noise to determine what individual steps we can take to shift our global community to more sustainable models. That is the what. Equally confusing is identifying where one can have the most impact with the least disruption, risk and cost. And last, how can we do it.If we assume that going “Green” is an individual choice and business choice by extension, then there is of course a need for education as most of us have grown up not really thinking about the broader impacts of our daily activities. Now that globalization is in full swing on many fronts, ecologic considerations can more easily become just another set of columns in the spreadsheet. After all, accounting for the long-term costs of environmental degradation through poor resource management is fairly straightforward. The challenge to date is that without standardized measures for these costs, an unacceptably high degree of subjective valuation exists.Now if you agree with the majority of the global scientific community that global climate change is the preeminent threat to global stability and quality of life, let us consider energy and the emissions that correlate. Considering that energy generation in the form of electricity (the wall outlet type) is far and away the number one contributor of green house gasses, close to double that of automobiles. What would you do with the ability to measure, monitor and control how energy is used in real time? What if it were easy to do?This is an important question you should be asking yourself today. In fact, you can already do this today via open standards like SNMP. Some savvy data center managers do it today through IP-addressable power strips (like the surge protector in your home but with a network connection). Others do it for certain classes of IT infrastructure like servers using vendor operating systems. The challenge with both these approaches is the high degree of customization required for protocol conversion and the limiting nature of having infrastructure tied to operating systems (proprietary code leads to “silo’s”).For those who don’t have the time to tackle elaborate management frameworks (often because our day job prohibits it) there has been no simple, ubiquitous, open way of tackling energy management across a range of infrastructure (IT and facilities).What if you had a simple way to do it that was free and able to run on existing infrastructure in the same network management framework you use today? What would you do with it?To get started you might look at the following steps:• How much energy is being used related to the IT assets in your business? • Where in the world is this energy being used?• What type of energy are you using or said another way, how is it generated?• What activities, processes and/or business functions does this energy support?• How would you define and apply energy efficiency to these functions?• How would you monitor and manage it?If you’re in a tech field, hopefully you see the professional development opportunities of becoming the energy manager for a significant portion of your business. We do, especially considering we estimate Cisco can save ~20% on energy the first year if we could deploy an energy management solution that could shutdown or “snooze” anything that can hold an agent. In our case, that would roughly equate to a $30M dollar savings per annum.A word of warning, you might be branded as the mr or msgreen at yourorganization(.com) if you were to take energy on board as a service you manage.Would love to hear your thoughts and thanks for reading.