Many examples of this exist, but instances of the West's civilian industry placing orders in the Russian defense sector and helping it back to its feet are hard to remember.
Yet this is what is currently taking place: Russian aircraft builders are negotiating with an unnamed Western firm about the possible resumption of manufacturing the Myasishchev-55 high-altitude plane.
This aircraft was designed in the Soviet Union during the late 1960s as a reply to the American Lockheed U-2 high-altitude reconnaissance plane. The current mission of Russia's M-55 will be entirely peaceful -- relaying telecommunications signals. But the fact remains: Western firms could help renew the production of Russian high-altitude reconnaissance planes.
Ever since the late 1950s, American U-2 aircraft exasperated Russian leaders by making reconnaissance flights deep into Soviet. territory at an altitude beyond the reach of interceptor planes.
Developed by Lockheed, the Lockheed U-2/TR-1 aircraft was nicknamed the Black Lady of Espionage in the United States for fulfilling mainly CIA assignments.
In May 1960, its flights over the Soviet Union came to an end when an American aircraft piloted by Francis Gary Powers approached the Ural Mountains and a new Russian anti-aircraft missile made a direct hit. But the urgency of developing the M-55 did not go away.
Aside from direct reconnaissance duties these planes were given the task of fighting high-altitude balloons that drifted over Soviet territory and conducted aerial photography and filming.
The need to install weapons aboard the aircraft made the designers seek an acceptable weight-to-payload ratio. The final product was a light-weight and rugged two-fuselage design, which, incidentally, is not typical of serially-produced planes.
Balloon operations soon petered out, however, dispensing with the need to arm the M-55. That increased its carrying capacity and added to its payload, but the plane never reached a serial production stage.
To cater to the needs of the Russian Defense Ministry, the Smolensk aircraft plant manufactured four prototypes, two of which were lost in accidents. One of the remaining planes was converted to a flying environmental monitoring laboratory that came to be known as the M-55 Geophizika, a peaceful-sounding name.
The Western plans to transform a reconnaissance plane into a telecom aircraft are logical; in some cases using aircraft for civilian communications purposes proves more advantageous than satellite relaying. Incidentally, the military widely employs airborne relay facilities. In Russia, these are the An-12 RT and An-26-RT aircraft and Mi-9 helicopters.
Sometimes aviation is the only possible option.
In the world there are quite a few spots where satellite channels are inadvisable or impossible. For example, in areas hit by natural disasters, when the ground communication infrastructure is destroyed and the delivery of mobile stations is rendered difficult. In such cases, the optimum solution is a special aircraft.
It is also desirable that for economic reasons it should be as high-flying as possible. At an altitude of 12 miles such an aircraft can send signals over an area one order of magnitude wider than the one served by five planes flying at an altitude of four miles.
An additional requirement is a large payload because communication equipment weighs a lot.
It appears the M-55 is simply a must for sustained communication in non-standard situations. Here is a brief summary of its specifications.
The plane is equipped with two unsupercharged engines with a nominal thrust of 9,900 pounds each; it is 1,430 pounds at a ceiling of 12.9 miles. It has a cruise speed of 444 miles per hour and a maximum range of 3,000 miles at an altitude of 52,000 feet.
In their day the Americans built 35 U-2/TR-1 planes. No other aircraft matches the M-55 in the world today, but there have been a number of reports recently that the Black Lady is resuming serial production.
(Andrei Kislyakov is a political commentator for RIA Novosti. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.)
(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)