On 12/28/2010 08:18 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> 2010/12/29 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>>
> If you've solved the deterministic-ordering problem, then this entire
> patch is quite useless. You can just run a normal dump and diff it.
> No, that's only half true.
> Diff will do a good job minimizing the "size" of the diff output, yes,
> but such a diff is still quite useless if you want to quickly grasp
> the context of the change.
> If you have a hundreds of functions, just looking at the changed
> source code is not enough to figure out which functions were modified,
> unless you have the brain power to memorize every single line of code
> and are able to figure out the function name just by looking at the
> old and new line of codes.
diff -F '^CREATE' ...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Karl Lehenbauer||Date: 2010-12-29 02:23:58|
|Subject: Re: Revised patches to add table function support to PL/Tcl (TODO item)|
|Previous:||From: Joel Jacobson||Date: 2010-12-29 01:18:46|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump --split patch|