I know of no "Guide to Blacklight Results". But in some paperweight books, general comments have been given for such as antique French weights and also for 20th century Ysart items.
Paul Hollister Jr, discussed UV test results in his 1969 book, The Encyclopedia of Glass Paperweights
pages 285/6. He pointed out that specific UV colours had, by then, been stated for a range of antique French weights. However, as result of further tests under more strictly controlled conditioned, he concluded that there were variations. For example, he said that some people had reported "peachy pink" for Baccarat weights whereas the previously defined colour had been said to be "deep blue".
From my own tests of limted numbers of weights, using both longwave and shortwave uv (only the longwave "black light" was used back in 69) I concur with Hollister's reservations. There are variations which confound and confuse attempts at setting down a definitive uv colour range for a given maker's weights.
What I have found, though, is that Green is a standard black light uv result for clear glass from centuries past to the present day (I have even checked some 18th century English ale and wine glasses). Basically, it seems that standard "soda glass" will fluoresce with a shade of Green and so will much of the "lead glass". So a black light uv test can't really prove anything - other than that the glass "glows nicely" [and perhaps that a really strong yellow-green reaction could indicate the presence of uranium oxide in the batch].
In my article Identifying Paul Ysart Paperweights
(see The Glass Museum pages: http://www.glass.co.nz/ysart.htm
) I set down a table of uv results that updated those in the Scottish Paperweights
book. I also added some brief caveats as I had noted differences in the results for some weights. That was in 1999/2000. Since then, I have seen further variations in shades of colour, although in the main, my table of results is still ok for general separation of Ysart items into the wider periods of their making.
I firmly believe that uv testing is a tool that can aid the identification of paperweights, but it cannot usually be used alone to state an attribution.
I would like to be able to test large numbers of positively attributed weights of various makers. But this is a very difficult thing to achieve, even within a paperweight club. However, if there is anyone in the UK reading this message who has a large collection (at least 100 would be useful) of positively identified weights from a given maker, preferably also with positive dating information, I would be happy to arrange a visit to check and tabulate the uv results.