Jurors in the trial of George Zimmerman began deliberations Friday but did not reach a verdict. They return Saturday. The jury could convict Zimmerman of second-degree murder or manslaughter for shooting Travyon Martin, or acquit him of both charges. Zimmerman’s lawyers tried to convince the jury that he did not commit a crime because he was defending himself. Did they convince you? Or do you think the state’s prosecutors established beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman committed murder or at least manslaughter? Was he a wanna-be cop who profiled Martin? Talk about it!
NEWS AND VIEWSCopyright © 2015, Hartford Courant