On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:29 +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fix (some of the) breakage introduced into query-cancel processing by HS.
> It is absolutely not okay to throw an ereport(ERROR) in any random place in
> the code just because DoingCommandRead is set; interrupting, say, OpenSSL
> in the midst of its activities is guaranteed to result in heartache.
...That was not introduced by HS.
> Instead of that, undo the original optimizations that threw away
> QueryCancelPending anytime we were starting or finishing a command read, and
> instead discard the cancel request within ProcessInterrupts if we find that
> there is no HS reason for forcing a cancel and we are DoingCommandRead.
> In passing, may I once again condemn the practice of changing the code
> and not fixing the adjacent comment that you just turned into a lie?
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-07 20:29:00|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix (some of the) breakage introduced into query-cancel |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-07 20:17:44|
|Subject: pgsql: Fix 3-parameter form of bit substring() to throw error for |