A new paper by David Shaw in Clinical Ethics this month argues that non-indicated circumcision performed by a physician is unethical. The paper states that an ethical doctor will object to conducting a clinically unnecessary operation on a child who cannot consent simply because of the parent’s desires or religious beliefs.
This paper says physicians can no longer take an active role by promoting circumcision, or a passive role by acquiescing to parent’s requests. Rather, the only way for them to practice medicine in a ethical manner requires them to side-step the practice altogether and become conscientious objectors. This is in direct opposition to the American Pediatrics Association circumcision policy that encourages physicians to be fence-sitters.
More than ninety-nine percent of infant circumcisions in the United States are non-indicated. Intactivists have been saying circumcision is unethical for more than twenty years.
One Response to “Infant circumcision is unethical paper says”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.