On May 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
>>> functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
>>> Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
>>> section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest
>>> of the functions?
>> No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
> Yea, I was wondering about that. I think the best idea would be to
> reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather
> than move them.
Well, pg_backend_pid makes no sense being in with the stats
functions, so I'll move it. I'll just include references to the other
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2007-05-07 18:58:06|
|Subject: PITR and tar|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-05-07 01:25:21|
|Subject: Re: row-level stats and last analyze time |