posted on Sep, 20 2012 @ 02:14 PM
Think about it like this; Jesus was born of woman so he was full human, but he was also born of God. We know that if any sin at all, including the
inherited sin of Adam was found in Jesus, then his sacrifice would have been invalid and meant nothing, he had to be sinless. So if his father was
sinless, and his mother was of sin, then we can stipulate that sin must be passed through the Father, otherwise Jesus death was invalid.
Consider Romans 3:23 (KJV) "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God"
Also, John 3:3 (KJV) "I [Jesus] say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God" [referring to acceptance of salvation
as we are with sin]
Now if sin is passed down through the father, and Jesus was sinless, then His children would be born sinless would they not? And that would contradict
the very scriptures above. The purpose of Jesus sacrifice is to clear humanity of its sin, and this is not just sins we commit, but ones we are born
into, "original sin". The bible and Jesus himself are very clear about all humans being born into sin, no exceptions whatsoever. All humans are born
into sin, there is none exempt other than Jesus himself.
Jesus being married presents no clear contradiction to Christianity, but logic tells us without contraceptives, that Jesus would have had to father
children, if Jesus was born a man, then his Children would have been human, and contradict the scriptures. Sure Jesus may have been infertile, but the
argument continues. Jesus was wholly dedicated to His purpose in being on earth, to be offered as a sacrifice, in the scriptures there is no clear
evidence that Jesus was married, and there is no clear evidence that he wasnt married, so this calls for wisdom and discernment and common sense.
Continuing, Jesus knew human nature, He knew if some part of Him was left behind, something as small as a piece of the cross, part of his robe, some
other thing, it would be worshipped. For example look at the artifacts supposedly left behind by Him, we are obsessed with them, finding their
legitimacy; Jesus was not a fool, He knows our nature, it is easier to worship what can be seen than what cant be seen, I believe it was intentional
of God that no physical thing would be left behind outside of the scripture. So imagine how much more chaos it would cause if there was a bloodline to
Jesus? If you believe Jesus to be God, and believe God had Jesus purpose here planned, then it is common sense to see that having a physical bloodline
would only cause problems down the road. We would focus not on Jesus and His sacrifice, but moreso on finding the lineage.
So in closing, yes Jesus being married doesnt prove any real contradiction to scriptures, but what it does do, is it does provide a huge potential for
fundamental contradictions. Personally I feel there are far too many imposters in those days, and the conspiracy theorist in me feels this whole
papyrus thing just leaves too much open to speculation. Lastly, it makes no sense why God, incarnate through Jesus with a very specific mission, would
come here and get married on the side, and almost put His wife on the backburner so he can die. It just seems like too much of a problem that God
would have the foresight to see being caused down the road.