Comparing DG and Nedelec finite element discretisations of the second-order time-domain Maxwell equation
|Abstract:||This article compares the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method (DG-FEM) with the -conforming FEM in the discretisation of the second-order time-domain Maxwell equations with possibly nonzero conductivity term. While DG-FEM suffers from an increased number of degrees of freedom compared with -conforming FEM, it has the advantage of a purely block-diagonal mass matrix. This means that, as long as an explicit time-integration scheme is used, it is no longer necessary to solve a linear system at each time step -- a clear advantage over -conforming FEM. It is known that DG-FEM generally favours high-order methods whereas -conforming FEM is more suitable for low-order ones. The novelty we provide in this work is a direct comparison of the performance of the two methods when hierarchic -conforming basis functions are used up to polynomial order . The motivation behind this choice of basis functions is its growing importance in the development of - and -adaptive FEMs.
The fact that we allow for nonzero conductivity requires special attention with regards to the time-integration methods applied to the semi-discrete systems. High-order polynomial basis warrants the use of high-order time-integration schemes, but existing high-order schemes may suffer from a too severe time-step stability restriction as result of the conductivity term. We investigate several alternatives from the point of view of accuracy, stability and computational work. Finally, we carry out a numerical Fourier analysis to study the dispersion and issipation properties of the semi-discrete DG-FEM scheme and several of the time-integration methods. It is instructive in our approach that the dispersion and dissipation properties of the spatial discretisation and those of the time-integration methods are investigated separately, providing additional insight into the two discretisation steps.
|Additional information:||Please note an alternative spelling of the name of the 2nd author: Botchev or Bochev.|
|Copyright:||© 2009 University of Twente, Department of Applied Mathematics|
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS)
|Link to this item:||http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/68865|
|Export this item as:||BibTeX|
Show download statistics for this publication
Daily downloads in the past month
Monthly downloads in the past 12 months
Repository Staff Only: item control page