Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:
> In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
> takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
> documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
> (almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?
I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend
Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.
Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a
> Yahoo! Mail - O melhor e-mail do Brasil! Abra sua conta agora:
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Description: text/x-vcard (640 bytes)
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Shridhar Daithankar||Date: 2004-02-21 08:13:10|
|Subject: Re: jade X openjade|
|Previous:||From: Halley Pacheco de Oliveira||Date: 2004-02-20 15:16:09|
|Subject: jade X openjade|