Re: Slink: emacs19 != emacs19?
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 11:09:06PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Can somebody explain to me why slink/binary-i386 contains emacs 19.34-21
> and slink/binary-alpha contains the older emacs 19.34-20?
Emacs has some problems. It had to be compiled with an older egcs 1.0.3 IIRC
and only *then* the resulting code (emacs own compiler) could build the
sources without too much trouble and without segfaulting.
Since 19.34-20 there has been no one that has succesfully build an emacs on
Alpha. This version is there because of hard labour of Loic...
B. Warmerdam GNU/Debian Linux
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org (Keyid: 10A0FDD1) ----------------