[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please update SRFI-106
Takashi Kato scripsit:
> If nothing will be raised for a week, I will request SRFI editors to
> make this SRFI final.
I finally got around to reading the spec closely; my apologies if these
questions have been asked and answered.
1) Why are there both flag-creating macros and constant variables with
flag values? It would seem to be enough to just have one. Personally I
favor having the macros, though I can see arguments both ways.
2) There is no meaningful support for UDP. I think a socket API
shouldn't ignore UDP.
On the Semantic Web, it's too hard to prove John Cowan cowan@xxxxxxxx
you're not a dog. --Bill de hOra http://www.ccil.org/~cowan