We as in a linkshell, and most people on that shell aren't racist. That's why I said WE. Look it up. It's a plural. Thus WE have more honor than YOU.
Most are not racist? Just certain ones? lol...whether it is all or one doesn't matter. The leader is a racist pig, and any members who choose to follow him are approving of his ways...including you. Again, there is no honor in racism.
We are still people. This is a means of communication very much like a phone. I suppose you don't need honor on the phone either? And, you do need it. You just lack it and therefore down play it as usual.
Posting messages in a forum is the same as talking on a phone? Are you serious? ROTF! Either way, you wouldn't know honor if it came up and bit you on your ****. You have no honor, you don't understand the meaning of the word.
Which is odd as the yes/no war was started by you.
What yes/no war? That isn't what this debate is about. It's about your linkshell stealing zones from others, and the disgusting behavior by you and your leader in response to it. How is that a yes/no war?
Mine too, and this would also explain why you made the accusations first. I'll give you one example since we know how your memory works. I'm the liar remember?
LOL! Another lame tactic. When someone makes a valid point, and then backs it up you give the typical illogical reply..."I didn't do it...you did it." Please, at least be a little more creative in your attempts to debate.
Don't pull a 180 now.
Have I stated that I've changed my mind on something? That is what doing a 180
refers to. Come on Mule, if you are going to throw in cliches at least do it in the proper context.
I suppose you don't name call either.
Oh, I most certainly do. Now let me explain why your reading comprehension shows a lack of skill. The difference is that I reply and give reasons why I say what I say, I don't sit there and call names for the sake of it. You do. You use name calling to reply to valid points, ignoring the point and diverting the topic in a different direction since you clearly don't have the debating skills to tackle the point. Ad hominem
as it is best exemplified by you.
And, of course you rehash while I reiterate to get the point across you never got in the first place. I'm afraid serving you a point though is much like trying to stuff a q-tip through concrete; it ain't gonna happen.
Okay, in the first sentence of that comment you state you are going to reiterate a point that I never got in the first place
. Well, what is it? The following sentence merely supports the first by stating a point is about to be given, yet no point is ever expressed. And that was the end of your reply...so what is this point that you claim I never got?