Subject: Re: What should S-expression based languages be called? (was: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp?) From: Erik Naggum <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:06:46 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <email@example.com> * Erann Gat | So I have another question directed to those who say Scheme is not a | Lisp: is the concept of "programming language with S-expression-based | syntax" not important enough to deserve its own less verbose term? If it | is, what should that term be if not "Lisp"? How hard is it to say "Lisp family"? /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.