How can anyone hold Pacman responsible for the injured people, just because he brought money to a stripclub?? Do you also hold the bankowner responsible if a security guard get's shot during a bankrobbery? I mean if he didn't keep money in the building, it wouldn't have happened, right? Pacman went to a stripclub, you take money when you go to a stripclub, it's part of the concept. So now you're basically saying that because Pacman took "too much" money to the club, he is responsible? If he had only taken $20K he would not be responsible? What about the other people "making it rain", they're not responsible even though they did the exact same thing as Pac? The ONLY thing, and I reiterate to make it clear, ONLY thing Pacman can possibly be responsible for, as the story stands now, is withholding information from the police regarding the shooter. But of course we don't know what the police has asked him nor what he has answered.