Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm still not very sure why you're hitting the problem more often than
> other people. There might be some tweak you could make in your
> application code to dodge the issue.
The initial size of the local lock hash table is 128. That's a lot of
locks, most applications probably don't use that many locks and
therefore avoid the issue.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2007-04-27 08:44:16|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-04-27 08:10:59|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3256: msi installer failed to upgrade to newer version|