Released On: September 06, 2011
"Providing water managers guidelines on how to use the various climate models is important to the Bureau of Reclamation," said Brekke. "They provide a foundation for water managers to make sound decisions using current climate models."
The proposed guidelines the authors discuss are:
- Understand to which aspects of climate your problem or decision is most sensitive.
- Determine which climate projection information is most appropriate for the problem or decision.
- Understand the limitations of the method you select.
- Obtain climate projections based on as many simulations, representing as many models and emissions scenarios, as possible.
- It may be worth the effort to evaluate the relevant variables against observations, just to be cognizant of model biases, but recognize that most studies have found little or no difference in culling or weighting model outputs.
- Understand that regional climate projection uncertainty stems from uncertainties about (1) the drivers of change, (2) the response of the climate system to those drivers and (3) the future trajectory of natural variability.
- Use the ensemble to characterize consensus not only about the projected mean but also about the range and other aspects of variability.
The article was co-authored by Philip Mote, Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, Oregon State University; Levi Brekke, Bureau of Reclamation; Philip B. Duffy, Climate Central and Ed Maurer, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Santa Clara.
To read the article, please visit: http://occri.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/EOSScenarios.pdf.
DOI | Recreation.gov | USA.gov
Stay in touch with Reclamation: Facebook | Twitter | YouTube | Flickr | Tumblr | Instagram | RSS | Multimedia