[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH][v3] Intel 82371FB/SB/AB/EB/MB southbridge support
corey.osgood at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 05:27:26 CEST 2007
Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:24:12AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
>> I used the name stage2.c for the code (not i82371xx.c) for now.
>> Shall we do that for all our chipsets and devices? A stage1.c file
>> for early init stuff, and stage2.c for the "normal" code?
> Does it scale? Will we be able to tell different stage2.o files from
> each other when linking etc?
Good point. Should we go with stage2-82371xx.c or similar? Also, with
stuff like SMBus where in v2 we have a header that stores a bunch of
functions used in both "stage1" and "stage2" (example: nvidia mcp55,
intel i82801xx, etc), how do we define naming of those?
More information about the coreboot