Sorry to the PP, I can't accept the shock-and-awe argument of fluoride being a fatal poison from a person whose signature's subject has very recently been soundly discredited by the medical community.
But to answer some of the questions/points honestly and seriously:
> Fluoride is rat poison (the main ingredient in rat poison)
Really? In what rat poison? Compound 1080 is one type of rat poison and it contains sodium fluoroacetate. Which is very different chemically than the sodium fluoride that's in toothpaste. That's like me saying breathing is dangerous to your health because you produce a substance that is "only one atom away" from a fatal, poisonous substance (breathing produces carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide is a fatal poison).
> Think about it, if a person has fluorosis from too much fluoride and it ruined his teeth, what do you think happened to his bones?
Chances are, not that much significant. Since you suggested I do my own research (and I presume wanted an answer to this question, not just presumed an answer as a rhetorical question), I found the following info on http://www.worldwaterday.org/wwday/2001/disease/fluorosis.html. Bold+red text is my emphasis:
Fluorosis is caused by excessive intake of fluoride. The dental effects of fluorosis develop much earlier than the skeletal effects in people exposed to large amounts of fluoride.
Clinical dental fluorosis is characterized by staining and pitting of the teeth. In more severe cases all the enamel may be damaged. However, fluoride may not be the only cause of dental enamel defects. Enamel opacities similar to dental fluorosis are associated with other conditions, such as malnutrition with deficiency of vitamins D and A or a low protein-energy diet. Ingestion of fluoride after six years of age will not cause dental fluorosis.
Chronic high-level exposure to fluoride can lead to skeletal fluorosis. In skeletal fluorosis, fluoride accumulates in the bone progressively over many years. The early symptoms of skeletal fluorosis, include stiffness and pain in the joints. In severe cases, the bone structure may change and ligaments may calcify, with resulting impairment of muscles and pain.
So chances are, a person would see the effects of dental fluorosis and have the chance to rectify the problem (reduce the amount of fluoride intake) before substantial damage occurs from skeletal fluorosis.
> If you ask one dentist he will absolutely agree that fluoride is not good for anyone's health, but if you ask a different dentist, they will say that it's good for your teeth.
Would that be the 1 out of 10 dentists that you hear about when "9 out of 10 dentists" recommend something?
> My ODS started to get fluorosis when he was still a baby (he got teeth at 4mths old) and I was told to give him fluoride drops since the day he was born. After doing all the research we stopped using fluoride drops and his fluorosis stopped getting worse
I'm sorry he had that experience. However, knowing that the beneficial effects of fluoride only occur from direct adherence of the fluoride ion to the tooth surface, I would agree whomever gave you the advice to give fluoride drops from the day he was born was indeed a moron. So at least it seems we have that one opinion in common.