We have just reviewed in summary form the impasse
Darwinism found itself in from the day it was first proposed.
We will now start to analyze the enormous dimensions of
this deadlock. In doing this, our intention is to show that
the theory of evolution is not indisputable scientific truth,
as many people assume or try to impose on others. On the
contrary, there is a glaring contradiction when the theory
of evolution is compared to scientific findings in such
diverse fields as the origin of life, population genetics,
comparative anatomy, paleontology, and biochemistry. In
a word, evolution is a theory in "crisis."
That is a description by Prof.
Michael Denton, an Australian biochemist and a renowned
critic of Darwinism. In his book Evolution: A Theory
in Crisis (1985), Denton examined the theory in the
light of different branches of science, and concluded that
the theory of natural selection is very far from providing
an explanation for life on earth.6 Denton's
intention in offering his criticism was not to show the
correctness of another view, but only to compare Darwinism
with the scientific facts. During the last two decades,
many other scientists have published significant works questioning
the validity of Darwin's theory of evolution.
In this site, we will examine this crisis.
No matter how much concrete evidence is provided, some readers
may be unwilling to abandon their positions, and will continue
to adhere to the theory of evolution. However, reading this
site will still be of use to them, since it will help them
to see the real situation of the theory they believe in,
in the light of scientific findings.