Fascinating. So abiogenesis is, in this theory, a nearly-inevitable consequence.
Years ago I read a book (both title and author escape me, unfortunately) about life's evolution and origins. The writer (who wasn't a theist, IIRC) speculated that there might be "laws of complexity" that led to the formation of self-replicating molecules and ultimately organisms as we know them now. England's theory might be something like that.
And the nice thing about it is it's testable. Even if it turns out to be incorrect, that in itself would be interesting; we could eliminate that particular line of inquiry from abiogenesis research and concentrate on others.