Re: Re: Re: LeastSquares using
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg89109] Re: [mg89085] Re: [mg89032] Re: [mg88986] LeastSquares using
- From: danl at wolfram.com
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 01:29:00 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200805230705.DAA25655@smc.vnet.net>
>> Gareth Russell wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > Is it possible to specify a least-squares minimization through the
>> > LinearProgramming function? In other words, exactly the same as
>> > LeastSquares, with the extra constraint that all x>=0?
>> > Presumably it comes down to specifying the input c correctly in the
>> > LinearProgramming function. But I can't see how to do that such that
>> > what is being minimized is the standard least-squares function
>> > ||m.x-b||^2
>> > Thanks,
>> > Gareth
>> If you can settle for an L_1 norm (so it's no longer least squares), you
>> can minimize a new variable abs, with new constraints -abs<=m.x-b<=abs.
>> Daniel Lichtblau
>> Wolfram Research
This elicited the response:
> Beyond that, the L1 norm is preferred to L2 for statistical problems
> because of resistance to outliers.
> Greg Duncan
> Dept Economics
> U California, Berkeley
Which motivates me to give a correct approach to finding the L^1 norm.
(What I showed, suitably interpreted, would give the L^infinity norm. That
is often useful, but not for this problem.)
The expression m.x-b is a vector, of length n, say. Call it c, and thus
the jth component is c[[j]]. Create a new vector d also of length n. It
will denote new variables. Then we minimize Total[d], that is, the sum of
components of d, subject to 2*n new constraints. For 1<=j<=n, there is the
I think (well, hope, at any rate) that I wrote it correctly this time.
Prev by Date:
Re: Wolfram Workbench user experiences
Next by Date:
Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: LeastSquares using LinearProgramming?
Next by thread:
Re: LeastSquares using LinearProgramming?