- Preliminary note: This essay is dedicated
to Holocaust revisionist scholar Dr. Robert Faurisson. He was the first
to point out the chemical and toxicological impossibility of these Auschwitz
gas chamber stories.
- Section one
- In early 2005, Holocaust historian Deborah
Lipstadt published her widely admired History on Trial: My Day in Court
with David Irving.1 The book is her version of events surrounding the
high-profile, 2000 libel trial in which British historian David Irving
sued Lipstadt for labeling him a "Holocaust denier." During the
duration of the trial, the media spotlight fell upon the ongoing battle
between revisionist and traditional views of the Jewish tragedy during
W.W.II. In her publication, she put forth in laymen's terms that everyone
could understand, straightforward reasons as to why one should reject Holocaust
revisionist theories and accept the existence of the homicidal Auschwitz
- In Part I of this two part series, we
rebutted a portion of Lipstadt's critique of Fred Leuchter, the American
gas chamber expert who carried out the first ever forensic study of the
alleged Auschwitz gas chambers. We saw that, although Leuchter's pioneering
report had its shortcomings, its findings were essen tially corroborated
by the more thorough and exacting scientific study of the former Max Planck
Institute chemistry doctoral candidate, Germar Rudolf.
- Both reports found only minuscule traces
of hydrogen cyanide gas (HCN) residue in samples taken from the walls and
floors of the alleged homicidal Auschwitz gas chambers. Yet, very large
amounts of HCN residue were found in samples taken from the non-homicidal
disinfestation chambers, where HCN was used only to delouse mattresses,
clothing and other belongings. If the structures in question were actually
used as homicidal gas chambers, one would expect to find a considerable
HCN residue buildup, somewhat comparable to that found in the non-homicidal
disinfestation chambers. In both reports the conclusions are the same.
The alleged homicidal gas chambers never existed.
- Here in Part II, we will examine the
technique and operation of the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers as put forth
by Professor Lipstadt and one of her main expert witnesses, Dr. Robert
Jan van Pelt, and then ask the questions: "Is this scientifically
possible?Did the gas chambers ever exist?"
- Section II
- In her attempt to prove that the Auschwitz
gas chambers existed, Lipstadt critiques the report of Holocaust revisionist
and gas chamber expert Leuchter. "Had Irving done some research,"
she writes, "he might have discovered Leuchter's mistaken assumption
that it took 3,200 parts of HCN per million to kill humans, when in fact
it took far less. On the basis of this wrong calculation, Leuchter had
contended that the residue from such a large amount of gas [would have
necessitated that] the Sonderkommandos-the inmates who removed the bodies-would
have had to wait twenty-four hours before entering the chambers."2
- In order to give the reader the appropriate
perspective, let us recreate Lipstadt's scenario. The intended victims
(one to two thousand) were jammed into the gas chamber. The deadly hydrogen
cyanide was circulated throughout the chamber, and the victims were murdered.
The ventilation systems removed the residual HCN. Now it was time for
the inmates to go into the chamber and remove the bodies for cremation.
She asserts that it was wrong for Leuchter to claim that the Sonderkommandos
would have had to wait twenty-four hours before entering the chamber.
This claim and others were wrong, Lipstadt insists, "because it actually
took only 10 percent of what Leuchter had assumed was necessary to kill
humans." She claims this is Leuchter's fundamental mistake-"the
assumption that it took far more gas to kill humans than to kill vermin,
when, in fact, the reverse was true."3
- Simply put, much more gas was used in
a non-homicidal disinfestation than in a homicidal gassing.4
- The assertions of the late Jean-Claude
Pressac--a widely respected expert on the Auschwitz gas chambers whose
work attempted to refute the Holocaust revisionists--undermines Lipstadt.
Pressac claimed that 12 to 20 grams per cubic meter is the concentration
of the HCN allegedly used in a homicidal gassing, while 2 to 5 grams per
cubic meter was the concentration used in a non-homicidal disinfestation/delousing.5
Contradicting Lipstadt, Pressac is claiming that a greater gas concentration
would have been used to kill humans than that ne eded to kill vermin in
a delousing. Once again, Pressac's claim contradicts Lipstadt, which suggests
that she and her fellow promoters of the Holocaust ideology change their
story according to the propaganda needs of the moment.
- Enter Dr. Robert Jan van Pelt, a professor
of architecture at the University of Waterloo, Canada. He is widely considered
to be the foremost expert on the technique and operation of the alleged
Auschwitz gas chambers. In connection with the defense of Professor Lipstadt
at the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial in London from January to April 2000,
van Pelt testified as an expert witness on these alleged instruments of
mass murder. It is readily apparent that Lipstadt relies heavily on the
work of van Pelt in her attempt to prove the existence of the Auschwitz
gas chambers. So, any critique of Lipstadt's theories must also be a critique
of van Pelt.
- In his magnum opus, van Pelt makes three
important claims in regard to the technique and operation of the homicidal
gas chambers. First, most of the deadly hydrogen cyanide gas released
into the chamber was absorbed by the victims' bodies.
- Contradicting Holocaust revisionist claims,
he insists that the ventilation systems of the gas chambers were efficient
enough to remove virtually all of the remaining HCN after a mass gassing
so that the Sonderkommandos could enter the chambers within a very short
time after the death of all of the victims in order to do their work.
In van Pelt's own words: "The situation in the gas chambers was different.
With its powerful ventilation system and with the fact that most of the
hydrogen cyanide was absorbed by the victims' bodies, the time [needed
to ventilate the gas chambers so the Sonderkommandos could safely enter
them to remove the bodies] could be reduced to twenty minutes."6
- Finally, he claims that David Olere,
a French-Jewish deportee to Auschwitz in 1943, is one of the most important
eyewitnesses to the operation of the gas chambers. In his own words, the
sketches of Olere "provide a very important visual record of the design
and operation of the gas chamber and incinerators of Crematorium 3"7
Indeed, throughout his entire study he attempts to demonstrate that Olere
is a credible eyewitness by showing how his sketches are consistent with
- Jean-Claude Pressac also claimed that
the drawings of Olere that will be examined in this article are an important
visual record of the operation of the homicidal gas chambers.8 And last
but not least, Deborah Lipstadt attempts to convince her readership that
Olere is a credible eyewitness by showing how his claims are consistent
with the physical evidence. In this regard, she refers to the "drawings
by Sonderkommando David Olere, who, upon liberation sketched the gas chambers.
- The sketches, Robert Jan [van Pelt] noted,
were fully corroborated by the architectural plans in the Auschwitz Central
Construction Office and the aerial photos."9
- Thus, Lipstadt, Pressac and van Pelt
claim that Olere is perhaps the most important eyewitness to the alleged
mass gassings, and his sketches, paintings and drawings provide the world
with an accurate description of the technique and operation of the Auschwitz
gas chambers. But is this so? Professor van Pelt's omission and inclusion
- Let us begin with van Pelt's omission.
In his book van Pelt published some of Olere's more important sketches
regarding the structure and operation of the alleged gas chambers, but
failed to include one of his most important drawings. It is the painting
showing the Sonderkommmandos opening the gas chamber door and pulling the
bodies out after a mass gassing. In the painting, the inmates are shirtless,
and they are not wearing any gas masks, rubber gloves or protective suits.
Before proceeding, the reader is strongly urged to view and study the
sketch in question. It is online at the address in this footnote. Scroll
down to "Document 30."10
- Pressac includes this painting in his
book because it allegedly is an important visual record of the operation
of the gas chambers. In regard to this matter, he wrote: "The fragment
of furnace shown on the left, beyond the two arrows, is purely symbolic
(there was no furnace in the basement) and spoils a scene which would have
been irreproachable without this addition 'to make it better.'" Pressac
is clearly saying that this sketch is an accurate picture of what happened,
even though it does contain one purely symbolic item.11
- This is a strange omission on the part
of van Pelt. That is to say, he writes a book about the operation of the
gas chambers, yet omits to include a sketch of "how-it-really-happened."
For here we have an alleged sketch of "how-it-really-was" after
a mass gassing, when the Sonderkommandos-under the watch and supervision
of Nazi guards--opened the door of the gas chamber to remove the victims
- Perhaps one reason that van Pelt failed
to include this most important sketch is because he may have realized it
could not have happened the way Olere claimed it did. Herewith.
- Authoritative industrial sources confirm
the extreme danger surrounding the use of HCN. Poisoning can easily occur
by inhalation or skin absorption.12
- Leuchter spoke of the dangers surrounding
the handling of just one (!) victim that was poisoned by HCN in a gas chamber:
"You go in. The inmate has to be completely washed down with chlorine
bleach or with ammonia. The poison exudes right out through his skin.
And if you gave the body to an undertaker, you'd kill the undertaker.
You've got to go in; you've got to completely wash the body."13
- Bill Armontrout, expert witness at the
second Ernst Zundel trial in Toronto and warden of the Missouri State Penitentiary,
which includes an execution gas chamber, confirms the danger: "One
of the things that cyanide gas does, it goes in the pores of your skin.
You hose the body down, see. You have to use rubber gloves, and you hose
the body down to decontaminate it before you do anything [else]."14
- In his capacity as warden, Armontrout
was personally responsible for carrying out executions by the use of cyanide
gas, and he was accepted as an expert witness in a court that was hostile
to Holocaust revisionism.15
- Armontrout revealed to the Toronto court
the safety precautions necessary to prevent those who handled the dead
criminal's body from being poisoned by the deadly HCN themselves: "The
ventilation fan ran for approximately one hour before two officers equipped
with Scott air-packs (self-contained breathing apparatus which firemen
use to enter smoke-filled buildings) opened the hatch of the gas chamber
and removed the lead bucket containing the cyanide residue. The two officers
wore rubberized disposable clothing and long rubber gloves. They hosed
down the condemned man's body in the chair, paying particular attention
to the hair and the clothing because of the cyanide residue, then removed
him and placed him on a gurney where further decontamination took place."16
- Real life tragic incidents corroborate
Leuchter's and Armontrout's claims.
- Twenty-three year-old Scott Dominguez
descended into a tank that once held hydrogen cyanide, and later phosphoric
acid, in order to clean it. When this unfortunate worker began chipping
away at the chemical film and hosing it down with water, hydrogen cyanide
gas was produced.
- Just like the workers in Olere's drawings
who supposedly removed the corpses from the Auschwitz gas chambers or the
hair and gold from the teeth of gassed victims, Mr. Dominguez was not working
with any safety equipment--no gas mask or protective suit. He was overcome
by the HCN and had to be carried away by emergency firefighters. This hapless
man suffers from permanent brain damage because of his exposure to HCN.17
- Another tragic incident involving firemen
during a rescue operation further supports Leuchter's and Armontrout's
assertions. In June 1995, there was a dramatic accident in a cave in the
French city of Monterolier. Three children lit a fire in a cave, and threw
an unexploded bomb they found from W.W.I that contained hydrogen cyanide
gas into the fire. The bomb exploded and released the deadly HCN. It
killed the children and also four firemen that came to the rescue. According
to a Professor of Physical Chemistry, Louis Soulie, the deaths of the children
and firemen, and even the fireman who was wearing a gas mask, were due
to the fact that hydrogen cyanide dissolves in the sweat and penetrates
the body through the skin, where it causes poisoning.18
- Let us repeat: One French fireman was
wearing a gas mask, but he perished because the HCN dissolved in his sweat
and penetrated his body. Even six days after their deaths, a cyanide concentration
twice as high as the lethal dose was detected in the blood of the corpses.19
- Finally, there is the incident of suicide
by cyanide poisoning that took place at Grinnell College, Iowa. A student
committed suicide by swallowing so much potassium cyanide that the fumes
from his body sickened nine people, all of whom had to be taken to a hospital.
The potassium cyanide reacted with the water in his body to produce cyanide
gas. The fumes that emitted from his body were so disturbing, that the
residence hall where the tragic incident took place, and the hospital where
the student's body was taken, had to be aired out.20 Keep in mind these
are fumes that exuded from just one body. Imagine the fumes exuding from
one to two thousand bodies that were allegedly poisoned by HCN in the Auschwitz
- In order to give the reader the appropriate
perspective, let us recreate van Pelt's alleged scenario. The intended
victims (one to two thousand) were jammed into the gas chamber. The deadly
hydrogen cyanide was circulated throughout the chamber, and the victims
were murdered. The victims' bodies absorbed the vast majority of the deadly
gas-it is in the skin, in the hair, pores and lungs of the victims. The
ventilation systems quickly removed the residual HCN. Now it was time for
the inmates to go into the chamber and remove the dead bodies for cremation.
- Once again, let us give van Pelt the
benefit of the doubt-the victims' bodies absorbed the vast majority of
the deadly HCN gas. Here we have over one thousand dead bodies being saturated
with deadly HCN-it is in the victims' hair, noses, mouths, on their skin,
in their lungs. As Bill Armontrout points out, the HCN exudes from the
- The Sonderkommandos enter the gas chamber
to remove the bodies. According to one of van Pelt's most important eyewitnesses,
David Olere, the inmates who removed the bodies from the chambers wore
no gas masks, protective suits or rubber gloves to protect them from the
inhalation or skin absorption of HCN. They did not even have shirts on!
- The heavy labor of removing the thousand
bodies from the chambers causes the Sonderkommandos to sweat. People who
are sweating are even more prone to absorb the deadly HCN through the skin.
- As the evidence points out, the victims'
bodies exude the deadly HCN-this is why the body of someone who has died
from HCN poisoning must be hosed down and rigorously decontaminated.
In neither Pressac's nor van Pelt's authoritative tomes is there any mention
that each victim's body was hosed down and thoroughly decontaminated after
a mass gassing, nor is this process included in any of Olere's "true-to-life"
- We return to the operation of the gas
chambers. The Sonderkommandos enter the chambers to remove the bodies.
They perspire because of the hard labor. This makes them even more prone
to absorb the deadly HCN gas that exudes from the mass of dead bodies in
the gas chamber. As Professor Soulie points out, the firemen died from
HCN absorbed by their sweat, even though one of them was wearing a gas
mask. Dr. van Pelt's most important eyewitness, David Olere, claims in
his sketches that the Sonderkommandos were shirtless and they wore no rubber
gloves, nor did they wear any gas masks. This makes them extremely prone
to HCN poisoning by way of skin absorption and inhalation.
- As we saw in the incident of the suicidal
student from Grinnell College, the fumes from just one body were toxic
enough to cause nine people to go to the hospital. Imagine the toxicological
impact of one to two thousand dead bodies, all exuding the deadly HCN,
upon the Sonderkommandos and Nazi guards who were wearing no gas masks
or protective suits. It would have been overwhelming!
- Thus, the important sketch of Lipstadt
and van Pelt's most important eyewitness, David Olere, contains a chemical
and toxicological impossibility. Although his discussion of this matter
is somewhat vague, van Pelt seems to implicitly realize that the Sonderkommandos
would have--at the very least!-- needed gas masks to enter the gas chamber
after they opened the door to remove the bodies.21 In this particular
sketch, the inmates removing the bodies and the Nazi guards supervising
those executions are not wearing any gas masks. The inmates dragging the
dead bodies are even shirtless!
- Perhaps this is the reason that van Pelt
failed to publish this most important drawing of Olere. He may have realized
that the sketch of his most important eyewitness to the operation of the
gas chambers contained a physical impossibility. In other words, he may
not have published this most important sketch because he did not want to
give Holocaust revisionists ammunition to use against the Auschwitz gas
- But it gets even worse for Lipstadt and
van Pelt. Let us now turn to a sketch of David Olere that van Pelt did
include in his book-the sketch that shows the Sonderkommandos inside of
the gas chamber after a gassing collecting the hair and gold teeth. Alongside
of the Sonderkommandos is a Nazi guard, only part of his leg and jackboot
showing. Once again, the Sonderkommandos are not wearing any gas masks,
rubber gloves, or protective suits to protect them from the deadly HCN
that would have exuded from the bodies of the over one thousand victims.
Before proceeding, the reader is strongly urged to view and study the
sketch under discussion. It is online at the address in this footnote.22
- We return to the assertions of the expert
witness, warden Bill Armontrout. The body of a gassed criminal is hosed
down and decontaminated, and especially close attention is paid to the
hair, as it is here that much of the deadly HCN collects. Yet, in Olere's
sketch, we see the Sonderkommandos-with no rubber gloves, gas masks or
protective suits-putting their hands in the hair of the pile of victims!
- Remember, van Pelt claims that the vast
majority of the deadly gas was absorbed by the victims' bodies-only to
exude from the hair and skin of the victims and ultimately kill the Sonderkommandos
who collected the hair and gold teeth! Nowhere in van Pelt's tome is
it mentioned that each and every body was hosed down and decontaminated
before the hair and gold in the teeth were removed. Nor does the "how-it-really-happened"
sketch of Olere show the Sonderkommandos-with gas masks and protective
suits--hosing down and decontaminating each and every body, which would
have been necessary to prevent poisoning from the ocean of deadly HCN that
would have exuded from the over one thousand dead bodies.
- We return to Lipstadt. She is saying
that because only 320 parts per million (10% of what Leuchter claimed)
was necessary to kill humans, the ventilation systems could have removed
the residual gas quickly, and the inmates could have entered the chambers
a very short time after the homicidal gassings to remove the victims for
cremation. All would have run relatively smoothly.
- Dr. van Pelt claims that 300 parts per
million of HCN is lethal to humans, and allegedly, this is the concentration
the Nazis used in the gas chambers.23 The 300 parts per million necessary
to kill humans is a little less than the Lipstadt's threshold of 320 parts
per million. This suggests that even small amounts of gas that would have
exuded from the skin, nose, mouth, and hair of one (!) dead body could
have killed any Sonderkommando, or any of the Nazi guards that allegedly
supervised those executions.
- Even worse for the Lipstadt/van Pelt
scenario, the amount of HCN exuding from each of the over one thousand
bodies would have, in the end, accumulated to an ocean of gas to poison
both the Sonderkommandos and the Nazi guards by skin absorption or inhalation.
- At the risk of sounding redundant, let
us again recreate the gassing scenario of Lipstadt and van Pelt in order
for the reader to clearly understand the chemical and toxicological impossibility
of the operation of the Auschwitz gas chambers. One thousand to two thousand
victims are herded into the gas chamber. The doors are closed, and the
deadly HCN is circulated throughout the chamber. The gas murders the victims.
As van Pelt claims, their bodies absorb most of the gas. The residual,
remaining amount is extracted from the chamber by the powerful ventilation
- The door of the gas chamber is opened.
According to the most important eyewitness, David Olere, the inmates who
entered the chamber to remove the bodies for cremation wore no gas masks,
rubber gloves or protective suits to protect them from HCN poisoning by
way of inhalation or skin absorption. The inmates that entered the chamber
to collect the hair of the victims wore no gas masks, rubber gloves, or
protective suits to protect them from poisoning by way of inhalation or
the skin absorption of the deadly HCN. The Nazi guards that supervised
these executions wore no gas masks or protective suits.
- The Sonderkommandos are confronted with
one to two thousand bodies, all saturated with deadly HCN. They do their
work with no gas masks, rubber gloves or protective suits. According to
van Pelt, the vast majority of the gas was absorbed by the victims' bodies,
only to exude from those same bodies and poison anyone who was not wearing
a gas mask, protective suit and rubber gloves.
- One of the important points here is this.
Even if we give Lipstadt and van Pelt the benefit of the doubt, and assume
that all of their assertions on the operation of the "gas chambers"
are all correct, their gas chamber operation scenario is still virtually
- If, without gas masks, rubber gloves
and protective suits, it is extremely dangerous to handle just one (!)
body saturated with the deadly HCN; if only one dead body saturated with
the deadly HCN can exude enough toxic fumes to send nine people to the
hospital, it would be almost impossible to handle one to two thousand dead
bodies saturated with HCN without gas masks, protective suits and rubber
- The inmates in Olere's sketches that
allegedly handled those one to two thousand dead bodies without gas masks,
rubber gloves, and protective suits would have been poisoned by way of
inhalation or skin absorption. The physical evidence provided by the three
examples of HCN poisoning-the Scott Dominguez incident, the Grinnell College
suicide, and the children in the cave incident-support this revisionist
claim. Thus, Lipstadt and van Pelt's most important eyewitness puts forth
an impossible scenario.
- It does no good to counter the revisionists
by saying: "Well, the drawings of David Olere are just symbolic of
what really transpired. He was engaging in 'artistic license' when he
depicted the Sonderkommandos with no gas masks, rubber gloves and protective
suits." If this is so, then his sketches are not an accurate representation
of the operation of the gas chambers. And, Dr. van Pelt's claim that Olere's
sketches provide a very important visual record of the operation of the
gas chamber of Crematorium 3 is not true.
- Furthermore, it does no good to counter
the revisionists by saying: "Well, the Nazis didn't care about the
lives of the Sonderkommandos, so they did not have to use the safety precautions
of gas masks, protective suits and rubber gloves." Quite the contrary.
The Nazi guards that allegedly supervised those executions had to make
certain that the Sonderkommandos quickly removed all of the bodies to make
room for the next batch of victims. Thus, they would have had to make
certain that the inmates stayed alive at least long enough to "get
the job done." That is, in order for them to stay alive long enough
to complete the job, they would have had to wear gas masks and protective
suits. Furthermore, in order to protect the lives of the Nazi guards that
allegedly supervised those executions, it would have been necessary for
them to wear gas masks and protective suits.
- Finally, let us assume that what Jean-Claude
Pressac claimed is the truth. The Sonderkommandos that entered the gas
chambers after a mass gassing wore gas masks.24 Even if we assume this
to be so, the "Auschwitz gas chamber" story is still impossible.
This still leaves open the fact that HCN poisoning can occur by skin absorption.
Nowhere in sketches of Olere or in the authoritative tomes of van Pelt
or Pressac is it ever claimed that the Sonderkommandos wore rubber gloves
or protective suits to protect them from the skin absorption of the ocean
of deadly HCN that would have exuded from the myriad of bodies in the gas
- The reader is asked to recall the story
of the four firemen who perished from the skin absorption of HCN, in spite
of the fact that one of them was wearing a gas mask. The reader should
simply consider the devastating toxic effect upon the Sonderkommandos,
all wearing gas masks, when they put their bare hands into the HCN saturated
hair and mouths of the over one thousand victims. Poisoning by skin absorption
would have occurred, because they never decontaminated each body and they
wore no protective suits or rubber gloves.
- What I reveal here is nothing new. As
far back as the 1970s, Holocaust revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson revealed
to the world the chemical and toxicological impossibility of this Auschwitz
gas chamber legend.
- Ironically, it is, I believe, a very
favorable sign for the future of Holocaust revisionism that most of the
Western power elites refuse to debate the Holocaust revisionists, but only
resort to name calling, threats of career destruction and jail sentences.
It suggests to the world that Holocaust revisionism cannot be defeated
with evidence and reason. The opponents of revisionism are intellectually
impotent, and they cannot defeat revisionism with facts, evidence and logic.
The "Holocaust" is a weak and flimsy ideology that needs special
laws, threats of career destruction and jail sentences to protect it.
- Deborah E. Lipstadt, History on Trial:
My Day in Court with David Irving (HarperCollins Publishers, 2005).
- Ibid, p.122.
- Ibid, pp. 122, 131.
- Ibid. p.36.
- Jean-Claude Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique
and Operation of the Gas Chambers (Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, 1989), pp.16,
18, 31. Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0011.htm
- Robert Jan van Pelt, The Case for Auschwitz:
Evidence from the Irving Trial (Indiana University Press, 2002), p.275.
- Ibid, p.173.
- Pressac, p. 493. Scroll down to Documents
30 and 31. Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
- Lipstadt, p. 140.
- Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
- Pressac, p.493. Scroll down to Document
30. Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
- Zyklon for Pest Control: Information
brochure of the German Society for Pest Control on the use of its insecticide
Zyklon B. Reprinted in Frederick A. Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar
Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition (Theses & Dissertations
Press, 2005), pp. 75-88. Online: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tlr/
- Stephen Trombley, The Execution Protocol
(Crown Publishers, 1992), p.98.
- Ibid., p.102.
- Barbara Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million
Really Die?: Report of the Evidence in the Canadian 'False News' Trial
of Ernst Zundel-1988 (Samisdat Publishers, 1992), p.351. Online: http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd31armontrout.html
- Ibid., p.352. Online:
- Department of Justice National News Release,
10 May 1999. Reprinted in Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf Report: Expert Report
on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the 'Gas Chambers' of Auschwitz (Theses
& Disserations Press, 2003), pp.18-19. Online: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2.
For a list of other articles on this matter, see the references in footnote
20 on p.19 of Rudolf.
- See the article about this in Rudolf,
p.20. Online: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2
- See Rudolf, pp. 17-18. Minnesota State
University, Mankato Reporter, Online Edition, 10 October 1998, "Suicide
fumes sicken nine Iowa students." Online: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2
- Robert Jan van Pelt, p.275.
- Pressac, p.493. Scroll down to Document
31. Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
- Robert Jan van Pelt, p.362.
- Pressac, p.16. Online: