> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:49:08 -0200 (BRST)
> "alexandre :: aldeia digital" <alepaes(at)aldeiadigital(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
>>Both use: Only postgresql on server. Buffers = 8192, effective cache =
> Well, I'm assuming you meant 1GB of ram, not 1MB :)
> Check a ps auxw to see what is running. Perhaps X is running gobbling up
> your precious mem. But still.. with 1GB there should be virtually no
> swap activity.
> How busy is the DB? How many connections?
> and is sort_mem set high?
Also are two kernels exactly same? In my experience linux kernel behaves
slightly different from version to version w.r.t swap aggressiveness...
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Manfred Koizar||Date: 2003-10-31 13:47:14|
|Subject: Re: redundent index?|
|Previous:||From: Jeff||Date: 2003-10-31 12:41:14|
|Subject: Re: Pg+Linux swap use|