"You might be able to lift the limitations of conforming to any centralised representational form of government, originally invented because there was no way for everybody's voice to be heard.
You might be able to give everybody unhindered, untested access to knowledge, because a computer would do the day to day work for which we once qualified the select few, in an educational system originally designed for a world where only the few could be taught.
You might end the regimentation of people living and working in vast, unmanageable cities, uniting them instead in an electronic community where the Himalayas and Manhattan are only split seconds apart
You might, with that and much more, break the mold that has held us back since the beginning.
In a future world that we would describe as balanced anarchy and they will describe as an open society, tolerant of every view; aware that there is no single, privileged way of doing things; above all, able to do away with the greatest tragedy of our era: The centuries old waste of human talent that we couldn't or wouldn't use.
If, as I've said all along, the universe is, at any time, what you say it is, then say ... ".
"As the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed,
the Internet deserves the highest protection from governmental intrusion". [...]
Judge Stewart Dalzell