Well, when you take way all of the rhetoric, it basically comes down to a single question: "Should this group or any group of citizens be afforded equal rights under the law?"
As long as the group in question is law-abiding, then the answer is obviously "yes", it can't be anything but "yes", and it should always be "yes".
I don't believe that the matter can be addressed more simply than this, and it doesn't depend upon whether or not one approves of homosexuality to reach this conclusion when this approach is used.
"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."