reply to post by the2ofusr1
I think the debate regarding the causes of climate change, and our use of fossil fuels should be two totally separate discussions, until or unless
any one lays down iron clad proof of what is causing the heating effect.
The historical record shows that heating trends have happened before, and indeed, at one point the entire surface of the planet was molten, so I can
well imagine that the surface temperature has been much greater than it is at the moment
However, where fossil fuels are concerned, the reasons to stop using it are far more numerous and possessed of far more gravitas than the warming
issue, as serious as the implications of some of the possible future effects of that, may be.
First of all, there is the economic problem with oil.
It costs a massive amount, and any government, business, or household which operates in the modern age, has some spending associated with the cost of
it. Whether we are talking about gas for heating or cooking, or petroleum for use in vehicles and generators, or coal for power stations, hearths, and
what have you, most people interact with a service or utility, or item, which requires fossil fuel use, and that is even before we get into the uses
of plastics and materials which are derived from fossil sources.
This stuff costs a proverbial crapload, and in a world where boom and bust culture has truly taken hold, it makes no sense to rely so heavily on such
an expensive commodity, especially when there are other methods of producing power coming on stream today, which, if taken up, could see every home,
office building and commercial structure, and every government installation, facility, or meeting place, reap enough energy, cleanly and for a one hit
payment, from nothing more than a modification to their windows, for example. A skin, like a photovoltaic cell sheet, is applied to the window, and
draws power from sunlight, even through heavy cloud. Versions are being developed which will reap energy from more of the spectrum as well, so that
will be a massive step forward, and battery technology continues to improve as well, making storing collected energy much safer, and more efficient.
One wonders why these things are not the focus of government participation, and prototype versions of this technology at work in public buildings, as
test subjects for a larger network. They are not.
I should also point out that this is just one of a series of very impressive advances in clean energy, which have rather less of the white elephant
about them than previous methods of cleanly recovering energy from the environment, like windfarms for example.
Furthermore, there is the geo-political issue of fossil fuels.
Wars are fought for it, men and women have died trying to get it up from the ocean floor, or from under the Earth on land. It is a dangerous and
expensive process, and causes massive arguments between nations, which spill over into conflict, both of the overt and covert nature. The US may be
more energy independent than it has been, but globally speaking, vast amounts of power are concentrated in very few nations. All that power links to
the amount of fossil resources they command, and the price that nations, and companies, are willing to pay for supplies of it. An example would be the
gas pipeline from Russia, which has been used by that nation as a lever to gain political and financial mastery over vast swathes of its former
territory, not to mention harassing the EU. This would not be possible if there was not this world wide obsession with the burning of fossil products.
So, it is easy to see that as well as being expensive, it also makes any nation which lacks its own vast reserves, utterly beholden to more resource
laden nations, and this causes conflict, or tyranny, or both to flourish, a situation which cannot stand, if mankind is to advance into a future which
is worth living in.
There are also health concerns regarding the burning, refinery process, and safety of fossil fuels.
Obviously, the products of fossil resource, like petroleum, are often quite flammable and volatile in nature, and near enough all of them are toxic
to human life, in certain circumstances. Consider the height from the ground, at which the exhaust pipe on most vehicles resides. You will note, that
it is not very far at all. But you will also note, that a childs face is far closer to the pipe than your own is now. You will probably remember, that
at one point, your face was that close to the height of an exhaust pipe as well. Spending a life, variously sucking down vast amounts of exhaust gas
from vehicles, is no way to live, and yet that is how people in the great metropolises of the world. Reducing the exposure of our lungs, to
potentially harmful gases, which are given off during the simple act of getting around, should be in all our interests, especially in cities.
And I would like to return to the flammability of the fuels being derived from fossil resources. By now, most people who have been alive for any
significant period of time, are aware that keeping naked flame away from such volatile chemicals is a good plan. But accidents happen. Gas and
petroleum (examples which I know I have used before, and will probably use again) will both pretty much explode if the storage and safety systems
which are supposed to contain them fail. Lots of money (again with the money !) is spent by companies, governments, and individuals, on storing or
piping fuel without it detonating. And why not, because lets face it, death by cataclysmic detonation is not the way that most people would choose to
go, especially if they are intent on an open casket funeral, rather than a nearly empty casket funeral, or a premature cremation. Trouble is, that
piping gas under ground, and storing petroleum under petrol station forecourts, means that if there is an earthquake, or a deliberate attempt to cause
massive arson, either storage/transit medium, could all of a sudden come into contact with a spark, and blow itself and anyone in the vicinity to tiny
little bits and pieces, and make person confetti out of them. It happens, and it is not the worst of it either.
When fossil fuels leak into the water table, having been freed from their storage mediums, they can cause all manner of environmental effects which
have nothing to do with the climate, in the immediate sense anyway. They kill fish and waterborne animals in rivers, and sea birds too, on coasts (a
la Deep Water Horizon), and what they do not kill they poison, making eating it a very poor idea. They poison the plants and trees with which they
come into contact, making food crops inedible. I remember reading about a rig and refinery which was set up in the Congo. People who had lived on the
land there for generations had to evacuate the area because all their livestock and other animals, on which they relied for food among other things,
were poisoned/killed by the toxic spills which constantly washed forth from the plant, as were their crops. Its not as if this stuff is not harmful in
a plethora of ways!
And there is yet more, and this is rather more about where we are going as a species than where we are now.
Mankind should aspire. As a species, we have done amazing things, built staggering edifices, launched man into orbit, and to the moon, established
stations in orbit too, and achieved feats which a mere hundred years in the past were the stuff of fantasy, and some, even beyond the realms of
imagining. But still I say that we should aspire to ever greater feats, ever casting wider the net of our understanding and our influence. We should
go as far as we can, all of us, together. We must look inward, yes, to solve our disputes, but outward to allow our explorer mentality to do its work,
and bring us the stars. This will never happen while we rely on such primitive means to get things done.