It's a really complicated relationship that depends on the metallicity of the star. There is a paper that does show this though: See New grids of stellar models from 0.8 to 120 solar masses at Z = 0.020 and Z = 0.001
Here are the Geneva Grids:
An extensive and homogenous database of stellar evolution models for
masses between 0.8 and 120 solar masses and metallicities from Z=0.001
to 0.1 is available. In general the models include evolutionary phases
from the main sequence up to either the end of carbon burning for
massive stars, the early asymptotic giant branch phase for
intermediate-mass stars, or core helium flash for low-mass stars.
Pre-main sequence tracks, both canonical (i.e. evolved at constant
mass) and accretion scenarios are also provided, as well as horizontal
banches for low-mass stars. Predictions regarding the spectral
evolution of massive stars can further be obtained from the so-called
"combined stellar structure and atmosphere models" (CoStar).
In addition to the evolutionary grids we also provide Fortran codes
for the calculation of isochrones and stellar population burst models.
Finally, references are also given to the serie of papers on stellar
models with rotation.
There are also older ad hoc models applied to the Sun: see http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1981SoPh...74...21G and http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1984SSRv...38..243S. They were referenced in 2011 publications though (like Pierrehumbert's 2011 Neoproterozoic Climate paper)
With that being said, it's not perfect. We don't know about variations in luminosity - the Sun's luminosity has varied in cycles (the 11-year sunspot cycle is one of them - but there may be others that last hundreds of years too - that could explain things like the Maunder Minimum). This is something that we might learn more of from Kepler telescope data on stellar oscillation, as described in the Chaplin et al. (2011) paper
It also depends on the angle that we view the star. And we may have to correct our zero-age main sequence luminosities too (since some stars can be unusually bright at zero-age). E.g. Altair is unusually bright for its temperature, but several papers have concluded that it's ZAMS rather than subgiant (it's rotating unusually fast, which is something you mostly see in new stars)