Barack Obama knew exactly how people would react to his Aug. 13 endorsement of the Ground Zero mosque, and created a firestorm of controversy by design.
Why? Obama is not your usual politician. He does not function within the framework of bourgeois politics, which encourages compromise, deal-making, and finding common ground, especially when a majority of the electorate seems to be lining up against you.
Obama is a community organizer i.e. a Communist.
Basically, they are revolutionaries. Obama’s mentor and teacher was Saul Alinsky, a Marxist radical. His book, Rules for Radicals, is the “Bible” of that movement. And the basic operating philosophy is the Marxist principle of class struggle.
But “class” now has a wider meaning than the traditional Marxist category of economic class. In the current stage of revisionist, Gramscian Marxism, “class” also includes cultural dimensions, such as race and gender.
Thus, Marxism now promotes a cultural revolution, involving the “deconstruction” — i.e., destruction — of traditional (and natural) gender identities, and their reconstruction along radical egalitarian lines. Within this new Gramscian/Alinskyite framework, we can aptly describe Obama as a “racial Marxist.”
Thus, the community organizer does not seek to find common ground. On the contrary, he wants to increase and intensify the conflicts, divisions and tensions within the community. To employ a Marxist phrase, he wants to “heighten its contradictions.”
The revolutionary may accuse his opponents of being “divisive,” but that is precisely what he seeks to do.
Obama, the president, is the same as Obama the community organizer. Only now his “community” is the United States as a whole. (And given the international power of the presidency, it is also the world as a whole.)
He may accuse his opponents of being divisive, but he himself seeks to polarize America and create conditions for a civil war.
Through the establishment (and some “anti-establishment”) politicians that it controls — and through the various organizations (such as the CFR) that it uses — the Illuminati seek to create division wherever they can.
They play both sides of every issue, which is what gives the “Ground Zero Mosque” controversy its incredible sense of contrivance.
The Illuminati was ultimately behind the decision to construct the mosque in the first place, knowing this would offend many people. Advertised as a gesture to “build bridges,” it was in fact designed to create conflict.
The head of the Cordoba Initiative, which decided to build the mosque, is Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, well known for his global connections. He has been closely associated with the Aspen Institute, funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and head-quartered in Washington, D.C.
It is active worldwide in “fostering enlightened leadership” for the new global order. (Aspen’s chairman, Walter Isaacson, former CEO of CNN, was recently appointed by President Obama to be head of the Broadcasting Board of Governors which oversees all of the U.S. government’s international broadcasting.) So the Imam is not just a local Muslim cleric; he is well networked with those who are planning and carrying out the global agenda at the highest level.
Once the decision to build the mosque was made, the Illuminati got politicians like Mayor Bloomberg to support it and politicians like Newt Gingrich to denounce it. The controlled media played it up and soon the country was angry and divided. And then they got Obama to throw more fuel on the fire.
What gives this whole controversy its greatest sense of unreality, however, is that Ground Zero is itself an Illuminati creation using their Mossad, CIA and other assets. The controversy over the mosque is designed to cement the bogus notion that Muslims were responsible for this heinous act.
Divide and conquer is their modus operandi. Divide men and women, parents and children, straights and gays, Muslims and Christian, nations and races.
The ground zero mosque controversy falls into this category.