Subject: Re: Is gcc slow? Or is our gcc slow?
To: David Gilbert <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: John F. Woods <jfw@FunHouse.com>
Date: 04/10/1996 20:18:51
> [My description of the sylogics system, deleted]
> In going through the old HW again, it seems that some of these
> were built with a single 68000. This puzzles me, given your comment.
If it ran 7th Edition UNIX or a derivative thereof, it didn't do paging,
hence it wouldn't need paging hardware. V7 would have been perfectly
happy with a straight 68000 and a simple segmentation map.