US 4070865 A
An improved method and composition for consolidating a porous and permeable subterranean particulated formation into a high strength water resistant mass is provided by a particular combination of vinyl monomers, catalyst system and optional features such as solvent, particulate filler, chelates and binders.
1. A method of consolidating a porous permeable formation using a consolidating composition which is not sensitive to pH, carbonates or water comprising contacting said formation with a polymerizable organic liquid mixture of (1) at least one vinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms and containing at least one group from phenyl, carboxyl or nitrile and (2) at least one divinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms, wherein each of said monomers is soluble in a low viscosity liquid aromatic hydrocarbon solvent; wherein said polymerizable mixture contains a polymerization promoter and a polymerization initiator comprising an organic peroxide, an azo compound or a combination thereof; and maintaining said polymerizable organic liquid mixture in contact with said formation until the monomers in said liquid mixture polymerize with the polymer chain and crosslink, having substantially all hydrocarbon linkages forming a crosslinked consolidated mass having a compressive strength after 24 hours of at least 120 psi.
2. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable particulate formation into a water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable organic liquid mixture includes a filler comprising finely divided relatively inert solid particulate material.
3. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable particulate formation into a water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable organic liquid mixture contains a chelating agent which controls the dispersibility of the initiator in the polymerizable mixture.
4. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable particulate formation into a water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable organic liquid mixture includes an aromatic hydrocarbon solvent.
5. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable particulate formation into water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable organic liquid includes a binder which facilitates coating of the polymerizable mixture onto the particulate formation.
6. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable particulate formation into a water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable organic liquid mixture includes a binder which facilitates coating of the polymerizable mixture on to the particulate formation wherein the binder is selected from organic silanes, organic surfactants, and mixtures thereof which are dispersible in the polymerizable mixture.
7. A method of consolidating a porous permeable formation of claim 16 wherein the polymerizable organic liquid is applied to said formation to seal said formation, reducing the flow of fluids through said formation.
8. A method of claim 1 for consolidating a porous permeable formation comprising contacting said formation with a polymerizable organic liquid mixture of (1) at least one vinyl type monomer having 3-13 carbon atoms and containing at least one group from phenyl, carboxyl or nitrile and (2) at least one divinyl type monomer having 3-12 carbon atoms, wherein each of said monomers is soluble in a low viscosity liquid aromatic hydrocarbon solvent; wherein said polymerizable liquid mixture contains a polymerization promoter selected from cobalt naphthenate, cobalt octoate, N,N-dimethyl aniline and combinations thereof; and wherein said liquid mixture contains a polymerization initiator selected from alkyl peroxide, aryl peroxide, alkyl aryl peroxide, alkyl ketone peroxide, azo compounds and combinations thereof; and maintaining said polymerizable mixture in contact with said formation until said monomers polymerize, increasing the strength and water resistance of said formation.
9. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable formation comprising mixing a low viscosity polymerizable organic liquid comprising a first monomer portion comprising at least one vinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms selected from styrene, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, divinylbenzene and combinations thereof; a second monomer portion comprising at least one divinyl monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms; a polymerization promoter which is soluble in hydrocarbon solvent; and a polymerization initiator which is soluble in a hydrocarbon solvent, said initiator comprising an organic peroxide, an azo compound or combinations thereof; applying said low viscosity polymerizable organic liquid mixture to said formation; and maintaining said polymerizable organic liquid mixture in contact with said formation until the monomers in said liquid mixture polymerizes, increasing the strength and water resistance of said formation.
10. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable formation comprising injecting into said formation a polymerizable organic liquid mixture of (1) at least one vinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms and containing at least one group from phenyl, carboxyl or nitrile and (2) at least one divinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms wherein each of said monomers is soluble in a low viscosity liquid aromatic hydrocarbon solvent; wherein said polymerizable mixture contains a polymerization promoter and a polymerization initiator comprising an organic peroxide, an azo compound or combinations thereof; maintaining said polymerizable mixture in contact with said formation until the monomers polymerize, increasing the strength and water resistance and decreasing the permeability of said formation.
11. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a porous permeable subterranean earthen formation penetrated by a well comprising mixing a low viscosity polymerizable organic liquid mixture comprising (1) at least one vinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms and containing at least one group from phenyl, carboxyl or nitrile and (2) at least one divinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms wherein each of said monomers is soluble in a low viscosity liquid aromatic hydrocarbon solvent; wherein said polymerizable mixture contains a polymerization initiator comprising an organic peroxide, an azo compound or combinations thereof and a polymerization promoter; injecting said polymerizable mixture through said well into said formation; and maintaining said polymerizable mixture in contact with said formation until said monomers polymerize, forming a water resistant formation.
12. A method of claim 1 of consolidating a formation comprising mixing a low viscosity polymerizable organic liquid mixture comprising a first monomer portion comprising (1) at least one vinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms and containing at least one group from phenyl, carboxyl or nitrile and (2) at least one divinyl type monomer having about 3-12 carbon atoms wherein each of said monomers is soluble in a low viscosity liquid aromatic hydrocarbon solvent; wherein said polymerizable mixture contains a polymerization promoter, a polymerization initiator comprising an organic peroxide, an azo compound or combinations thereof; and a filler comprising finely divided relatively inert solid particulate material; placing said polymerizable mixture in the desired location, and maintaining said polymerizable mixture in said location until said monomers polymerize, forming a water resistant mass.
13. A method of claim 12 of consolidating a formation into a water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable mixture includes an aromatic hydrocarbon solvent.
14. A method of claim 12 of consolidating a porous permeable earthen formation into a water resistant mass comprising applying to said formation a low viscosity organic liquid monomer mixture containing at least one low molecular weight vinyl type monomer and at least 1% divinylbenzene with a polymerization promoter and an organic peroxide polymerization initiator, and maintaining said mixture in contact with said formation until said monomers polymerize, forming a water resistant mass.
15. A method of claim 12 of consolidating a porous permeable formation into a water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable organic liquid includes a binder which facilitates applying the polymerizable mixture to the formation.
16. A method of claim 12 of consolidating a porous permeable formation into a water resistant mass wherein the polymerizable organic liquid mixture includes a binder which facilitates applying the polymerizable mixture to the formation, wherein the binder is selected from organic silanes, organic surfactants, and mixtures thereof which are dispersible in the polymerizable mixture.
17. A method of consolidating a porous permeable formation of claim 8 wherein the polymerizable organic liquid is applied to said formation, reducing the flow of fluids through said formation.
There are numerous prior art consolidation systems which are used for forming gravel packs, consolidating permeable formations and sealing permeable formations. Many of these systems are limited to specific uses and have problems associated therewith. For instance, many use high viscosity resins or prepolymer compositions which are sensitive to water, carbonates or high pH formations, or are adversely affected by low or high temperatures or result in a relatively low strength consolidation.
A particular combination of monomers and catalyst systems have been discovered and make it possible to overcome many of these disadvantages. By this invention particular compositions and methods are provided for consolidating a particulate formation using a polymerizable organic liquid mixture having low viscosity with a catalyst system comprising a polymerization promotor, such as an organo metallic compound or an amine, and a polymerization initiator selected from organic peroxides, azo compounds and combinations thereof. This invention can be used for consolidating a portion of a particulate formation into a high strength, water resistant mass which is either permeable or impermeable. The compositions can be added to particulate formations in place or combined with particulate material and placed into the desired location to form a gravel pack or sand mass consolidation. The compositions can be used as a low viscosity mixture of neat monomers with catalyst components and optional additives or with a solvent. In addition, certain monomers such as styrene, divinylbenzene, acrylic acid or acrylonitrile can be used as the only monomer for a certain application, or as a reactive diluent monomer, or as a reactive diluent monomer which also serves as a catalyst. The consolidating composition can be applied to a formation, coated onto a particulate material, combined or mixed with a particulate material or injected into a particulate formation as long as the consolidating composition is in contact with the particulate formation to be consolidated and is maintained under suitable polymerization conditions until the monomers polymerize to form a high strength, water resistant mass including the particulate material. Preferred compositions include solvents, particulate fillers, chelating agents, and binders.
The compositions can be considered basically a mixture of low viscosity monomers. This mixture comprises polymerizable liquid, low viscosity monomers which consist essentially of monomers serving two functions. For certain applications one type of monomer can serve both functions. The polymerizable liquid mixture includes the catalyst system, preferred additives and optional additives, if desired, mixed with the polymerizable liquid monomers.
Monomers which serve the first function can be considered as a first group of preferred vinyl tape hydrocarbon monomers. These monomers are basically low molecular weight, low viscosity hydrocarbon monomers having about 3-12 carbon atoms and containing at least one group or radical selected from phenyl, carboxyl or nitrile. The monomer liquid mixture should be substantially all hydrocarbon monomers having at least one of these reactive groups or radicals. A small amount of other monomers can be tolerated but are not preferred. For example, monomers with ester linkages should be avoided since they are sensitive to water and temperature extremes. The low viscosity monomer mixture can include mixtures of monomers having the preferred reactive groups indicated above. Vinyl type monomers are those which have at least one reactive vinyl group represented by the formula:
CH2 ═ CH--
the reactive groups phenyl, carboxyl or nitrile are represented by the following formulae respectively: ##STR1##
The second group of monomers are monomers which serve the second function required for the composition of this invention are the divinyl or difunctional monomers. These monomers have at least two vinyl reactive groups which can be polymerized and result in a crosslinked polymer network. These monomers are basically the same type as those for the first function except for the difunctional feature. For certain applications the difunctional monomer can be omitted. For example, for certain applications only one monomer such as styrene, acrylic acid or acrylonitrile can be used. However, a concentration of at least 1% by weight difunctional monomer or equivalent is preferred for the compositions of this invention. Examples of preferred difunctional monomers are divinylbenzene, 1,4-dibutylacrylate and polyester resin in low concentrations. The polyester resin contains maleic or fumaric groups which are actually polyfunctional and can be used, preferably in small concentrations, e.g., up to about 5%.
Examples of preferred vinyl type monomers are styrene, acrylic acid, methacrylic acids, acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, divinylbenzene and combinations thereof. Each of monomers should be of a type which is soluble in a low viscosity liquid aromatic hydrocarbon solvent. For low temperature applications, acrylic acid or acrylonitrile monomers should be present.
Monomers such as dimethyl itaconate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, and d-2-ethylhexyl fumarate can be used.
The catalyst system or composition of this invention comprises promoters and initiators. Preferred catalyst systems for the composition of this invention have a latent period or in effect provide a delayed polymerization which allows placement of the polymerizable, low viscosity, liquid mixture before polymerization significantly affects the viscosity of the mixture. This is especially advantageous where the liquid mixture is to be pumped through a well into a subterranean formation and injected into that formation. When conventional preflushes and afterflush phases are used to control the location and coating characteristics of the polymerizable liquid mixture, this latent period can be especially advantageous.
The promoter portion of the catalyst system can be characterized as an organo metallic compound wherein the metallic portion or ion has a valence which varies with conditions. Organo metallic compounds of cobalt, nickel, iron, titanium, tin, antimony, zinc, and vanadium are preferred. These metals are generally from Classes IV through VIII of the periodic table of elements. The organic portion of the organo metallic promoter is preferably a low molecular weight hydrocarbon such as an ester which allows the metallic ion to function and promote the formation of free radicals from the other portion of the catalyst system. The organic radical can be aryl, alkyl or combinations thereof wherein the aryl or alkyl radical contains about 3-12 carbon atoms. A preferred class of organo metallic initiators are the cobalt arylates and cobalt alkylates such as cobalt naphthenate and cobalt octoate. Naphthenic acid is an old name for hexahydrobenzoic acid or cyclohexanecarboxylic acid. Generally, the class of coordination catalysts can be used for the catalyst systems of this invention. Another type of promoter which can be used is the substituted amines such as N,N-dimethyl aniline as described by: Brauer, G. M.; Davenport, R. M.; and Hansen, W. C.; "Accelerating Effect of Amines on Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate;" November 1956, Breskin Publications, 575 Madison Ave., New York 22, N.Y., which is incorporated herein by reference.
The second portion of the catalyst system is a polymerization initiator. These are generally organic peroxides or an azonitrile type compound. The organic peroxides are preferably alkyl, aryl or combinations thereof wherein the alkyl or aryl radical has from about 3 to 12 carbon atoms. Examples of the preferred organic peroxides are t-butyl peroxide, ketone peroxide, methylethyl ketone peroxide, benzoyl peroxide, 2,5-dimethylhexane-2,5-diperbenzoate and t-butyl peroctoate. A preferred azonitrile initiator is azoisobutyronitrile. The formulas for methylethyl ketone and derived "peroxide" initiator are shown as follows:
Methylethyl ketone: ##STR2##
One of the forms of Methylethyl ketone peroxide: ##STR3##
A preferred but optional class of additives is the binders. This includes silanes, organo silanes and surfactants which affect or control the dispersibility and coating characteristics of the consolidating fluid. These silanes are called "silane adhesion promoters" by Union Carbide and are also referred to as silicon compounds. The surfactants and silane materials are described in the following U.S. patents which are incorporated herein by reference, U.S. Pat. Nos.: 3,123,137; 3,415,320; 3,199,590; 3,416,601; 3,221,814; 3,437,145; 3,291,214; 3,625,287; 3,625,287.
Preferred silanes or organo silicon compounds are listed as follows:
The surfactants which can be used in the compositions of this invention are those which are soluble or readily dispersible in an organic liquid such as the low viscosity monomers or the aromatic solvents used herein. The surfactants generally control dispersion of the various components in the organic liquid mixture and affect the attraction or coating ability of the polymerizable liquid on to the particulate formation. The surfactants also help to dissolve or maintain the various additives dispersed within the organic liquid phase. Preferred surfactants are blends of anionic, cationic and nonionic surfactants. Examples of preferred surfactants include hydrocarbon quaternary ammonium salts, alkylaryl sulfonates, ethoxylated hydrocarbon alcohols wherein each hydrocarbon radical, e.g., alkyl, aryl or combinations thereof, has about 6-18 carbon atoms.
Several preferred but optional additives include solvents, particulate fillers and chelating agents. Solvents which can be used with compositions of this invention are normally liquid aromatic hydrocarbon solvents. This can be mineral oil but the polymer is not soluble in mineral oil. The solvent serves to reduce the viscosity and dilute the polymerizable liquid. This dilution effect can be used to increase the permeability of the resulting consolidated mass and to reduce the amount of monomers required to coat and consolidate a given particulate mass. This in effect reduces the resulting volume of polymerized network which also reduces the ultimate strength attainable. For permeable consolidations careful control of coating, removal and distribution of monomer mixture in the particulate mass may be necessary which may require the use of various preflush and afterflush systems. Chlorinated solvents should be avoided. Chlorinated hydrocarbons have an adverse effect on refinery catalysts. In extreme cases explosive hyperactivity results. Most of the time organo halogens are bad for polymer strength because of chain transfer effects. For certain applications monomers such as styrene, acrylonitrile and acrylic acid can be either a reactive monomer or a diluent or solvent which reduces the viscosity of the polymerizable liquid mixture.
Particulate fillers which can be used for compositions of this invention are preferably relatively inert solid particles. The intended use will determine the particle size, particle size distribution and reactivity required. The particulate filler should be wet by the polymerizable liquid mixture for maximum strength. Preferred fillers include silica flour which is a finely divided silica, sand and biotite, exploded vermiculite (groupd up), ground granitic and basaltic materials. Chelating agents such as 2,4-pentanedoine can be used to improve the consolidation where the polymerizable liquid mixture must pass through the particulate formation. The chelating agent combines with the promoter (cobalt salts) and other organo metallic salts to maintain them dispersed in the polymerization liquid to assure complete polymerization of the monomers. In some cases, a particulate formation can extract or adsorb components from the polymerizable liquid mixture and adversely affect the resulting polymerized structure. Other conventional additives and methods can be used with the compositions and processes of this invention in view of this disclosure. Where the consolidating mixture is used to fill or plug a large void space or vug or it is desirable to attain a high compressive strength, a particulate filler is preferred. For applications where the particulate formation or gravel pack is to be impermeable, any reactive diluent or solvent concentration should be maintained at a minimum level. The use of filler and absence of solvent maintains shrinkage of the polymerized structure to a minimum. Since the compositions of this invention are insensitive to pH fluctuation, have no effect on pH and are not dependent on pH for initiating polymerization like phenol-formaldehyde, urea-formaldehyde, etc., they can be readily used where high carbonate materials present a problem.
The following preferred formulations and examples illustrate the invention and would enable one skilled in the art to practice the invention. Numerous variations will be obvious in view of this disclosure. The optimum concentrations, reaction conditions and optional components can be readily determined for specific formulations and application with minimum experimentation in view of this disclosure.
______________________________________Preferred Components and Concentrations by Weightof Liquid Monomer Mixture Narrow Range Broad Range______________________________________Vinyl type monomer 0-95% 0-100%Difunctional monomer 5-100% 0-100%Initiator 0.01-5% 0.01-5%Promoter 0.01-5% 0.01-5%Solvent 0-90% 0-90%Filler 0-85% 0-85%Binder 0-55% 0-55% Silane 0-50% 0-50% Surfactant 0-5% 0-5%Temperature Range 40- 350° FPreferred viscosity (without filler) <5 cp <10 cp______________________________________
Generally, the polymerization rate is directly proportional to the temperature. For conventional batch polymerization the temperature can be controlled by addition or removal of heat from the polymerization vat. With subterranean or in situ polymerization the temperature and heat transfer is governed by the temperature of the well and formation. Therefore, the polymerization rate and conditions must be controlled as taught herein by adjusting the concentration of various monomers, initiators, promoters, solvents and other components. For example, at high temperature a low concentration of initiator and promoter can be used for a low polymerization rate and a low heat accumulation from the polymerization. Solvent can also be used to adsorb some heat, act as a diluent to help control polymerization rate and the viscosity as polymerization progresses. For certain high temperature applications (down to about 100° F), certain monomers such as styrene can be used alone as the only monomer, although the resulting polymer will be a gel with a softening point rather than a crosslinked gel. Solid filler can be used to increase strength and reduce problems due to softening of the gel. For a low temperature (below about 100° F), high initiator and promoter concentration or certain preferred monomers such as methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, acrylonitrile or methacrylonitrile can be used for a high polymerization rate. Esters are of little or no benefit at low temperature.
Table I describes the components used in various formulations. Table II shows preferred formulations with solvent. Table III lists preferred formulations without solvents.
TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________Identification of ComponentsInitiatorsPeroxides Description Source__________________________________________________________________________t-BH-70 70% tert-butyl hydroperoxide Wallace and Tiernam and 30% ditert-butylperoxideTBHP-70 Same as t-BH-70 U.S. Peroxygen Corp.FR-22 58% mixed Ketone peroxides in U.S. Peroxygen Corp. plasticizerMEKP 60% methyl ethyl ketone peroxide in dimethyl phthalateBZW-70 70% benzoyl peroxide with 30% U.S. Peroxygen Corp. waterUSP-711 92.5% 2,5-dimethylhexane- U.S. Peroxygen Corp. 2,5-diperbenzoatet-BO tert-butyl peroctoate U.S. Peroxygen Corp.CPC-241 An experimental peroxide U.S. Peroxygen Corp.Azo TypeVAZO-64 azoisobutyronitrile Du PontVAZO-88 azocyclohexane carbonitrile Du PontCoN 6% cobalt naphthenate in mineral spiritsCO-12 12% cobalt octoate in mineral spiritsDMA N,N-dimethylanilineBinders Description Source__________________________________________________________________________A-151 Vinyltriethoxysilane Union CarbideA-174 3-methacryloxypropltrimethoxysilane Union CarbideSurfactants Description Source__________________________________________________________________________Redicote 80-S a cationic surfactant in the form Armour and Company of salts derived from tallowPrimine JM-T a mixture of cationic amines of the Rohm & Haas formula R-NH2 wherein R is a mixture of isomers having 12-14 carbon atoms with a t-alkyl structurePrimine 81-R a mixture of cationic amines of the Rohm & Haas formula R-NH2 wherein R is a mixture of isomers having a 18-22 carbon atoms with a t-alkyl structureOleic Acid crude oleic acid - approximately 70% oleic + linoleic + linolenic and other other fatty saturates9-11 Acid 9,11-octadecadienoicMMA Methyl methacrylate Rohm & HaasDMDA 1,3-butylene dimethacrylate Rohm & HaasACN Acrylonitrile Matheson, Coleman & BellDBF Dibutyl fumarate Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.STY StyreneDVB divinylbenzeneMAA Methacrylic acidAA Acrylic acidSolvents Description Source__________________________________________________________________________Panasol AN-3 Mixture of 95% aromatic hydro- Amoco carbons. AN-3 is principally ethyl naphthalene.Mineral Oil A substantially aliphatic hydro- carbon having a viscosity in the range of about 1-10 cp.__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE II______________________________________Preferred Formulations at 160° FFormula- Weighttion No. Components gms Remarks______________________________________1 Maleic anhydride 10 After 20 minutes Styrene 0 mixture cloudy. Divinylbenzene 1 After 25 minutes Solvent 80a mixture formed Initiatorb 0.5 mush.2 Maleic anhydride 10 After 35 minutes Styrene 9 violent polymeri- Divinylbenzene 1 zation. Solvent 80c Initiatorb3 Styrene 18 Less than 24 hours- Divinylbenzene 2 clear gel Solvent 80c Initiatorb______________________________________ .sup.(a) Aromatic solvent Panasol AN-3. .sup.(b) Azoisobutyronitrile (VAZO) .sup.(c) Benzene
TABLE III______________________________________Preferred Formulations Mixing FormulationFor- Se- Parts by Weightcmulation quence Material Typical Range______________________________________A 1 60% Divinylbenzene 5 --(>100° F) 2 Styrene 95 -- 3 Initiator 1 -- 4 Promoter 1 -- 5 Filler 340 --B 1 60% Divinylbenzene 5 --(>100° F) 2 Styrene 95 -- 3 Initiator 1 -- 4 Promoter 1 --C 1 60% Divinylbenzene 5 1-100%(<100° F) 2 Styrene 65 1-100% 3 Copolymera 30 0-50% 4 Initiator 1 -- 5 Promoter 1 -- 6 Filler 340b --D 1 60% Divinylbenzene 5 1-100%(<100° F) 2 Styrene 65 1-100% 3 Copolymera 30 0-50% 4 Initiator 1 0.1-5% 5 Promoter 1 --______________________________________ a Copolymer (in order of preference for lower temperature): Acrylonitrile, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, methacrylonitrile. b This amount may not be attainable when acrylic acid or methacrylic acid is used due to hydrogen bonding. c Each range of formulation component is in Percent by Weight of monomers.
It is preferred to omit solvents because the resultant strength reduction outweighs the volume gain. Fillers are used where macrovoids are to be sealed while fillers are omitted when capillaries are to be sealed.
TABLE IV______________________________________Examples of Solvents and SubstitutionsFor Styrene - Tests at 200° FEx. Gel TimeNo. Composition Chemicals Parts Minutes______________________________________1 2-Ethylhexyl acrylate 11 Styrene 9 Divinylbenzene 2 Mineral oil 78 Azoisobutyronitrile 0.5 402 Methyl methacrylate 15 Divinylbenzene 5 Panasol AN-3a 80 Azoisobutyronitrile 0.5 163 cinvinylbenzene 20 Panasol AN-3 80 70% t-Butyl hydroperoxide 1.0 6% Cobalt naphthenate 1.0 1674 D-2-ethylhexyl fumarate 20 Styrene 7 Divinylbenzene 3 Panasol AN-3 70 70% t-butyul hydroperoxide 0.5 70% benzoyl peroxide 0.5 14405 Dimetyl itaconate 10 Styrene 15 Divinylbenzene 5 Panasol AN-3 83 Azoisobutyronitrile 0.5 45a Typical Properties of Panasol AN-3:Flash Point, COC: 220° F (104° C)Major Constituents: 95% aromatic hydrocarbons principally ethyl naphthaleneGravity: 12.0° APIIBP: 440° F (227° C)EP: 550° F (288° C)Mixed Aniline Point: 57° F (14° C)Viscosity, SSU at 100° F: 45°______________________________________
The above tests serve to indicate the scope of this invention with respect to monomers that can be used.
TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________Preferred FormulationsInitiator and Promoter Examples With 95 grams-Styrene,5 grams-60% DivinylbenzeneTest Initiator Promoter, Grams Temp. Gel Time Compressive StrengthNo. 1 Gram CoN CO-12 DMA ° F Minutes PSI - 24 Hours__________________________________________________________________________1 BZW-70 0 0 1 80 1300 Friable 120 250 147 180 53 Very Soft2 USP-711 0 0 1 80 0 120 0 180 120 5,0383 t-BO 0 0 1 80 >7200 0 120 >300 6,744 180 30 5,4264 t-BH-70 1 0 0 80 1440 5 120 300 121 160 120 12,602 180 60 13,9805 t-BH-70 0 1 0 80 <2500 Gel 100 <1200 Gel 120 -- Gel6 t-BH-70 1 0 1 100 -- 7,607 120 325 9,9987 TBHP-70 1 0 0 80 2500 Gel 100 1200 Gel 120 -- Gel8 TBHP-70 0 1 0 80 2100 Gel 100 1200 Gel 120 -- Gel9 TBHP-70 0 1 1 100 -- Gel 120 -- 7,74310 MEKP 1 0 0 80 <1200 4 100 >500 20 120 295 38111 MEKP 1 0 1 80 <1200 10 100 870 7,935 120 220 10,45612 FR-222 1 0 0 80 <1000 28 100 420 315 120 211 9,380 140 140 10,355 160 66 12,223 180 43 14,030313 FR-222 0 1 0 100 -- 4,674 120 162 10,16214 FR-222 0 0.5 0 100 -- 7,823 120 200 10,39315 FR-222 1 0 1 80 <1200 6 100 425 6,686 120 215 10,659__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE VI__________________________________________________________________________Low Temperature TestsInitiator and Promoter: 1 gram BZW-70, 1 gram dimethylanilineTest Monomer System Gel TimeNo. Chemicals Grams Minutes at 75° F Remarks__________________________________________________________________________1 Maleic anyhydride 15 at 75° F - Spongy set Styrene 80 at 120° F in 7 min. set (explodes) 60% Divinylbenzene 5 122 Maleic anhydride 15 6% cobalt naphthenate substi- Styrene 80 tuted for dimethylaniline. 60& Divinylbenzene 5 Never at 120° F in 127 min. set (explodes)3 Maleic anhydride 15 Spongy set Styrene 45 60% Divinylbenzene 5 Methacrylic acid 15 Ethyl acetate* 20 154 Methyl methacrylate 20 Weak set in 3 days Styrene 75 60% Divinylbenzene 5 14405 Methyl methacrylate 40 Stronger than Test 4 but still Styrene 55 weak in 3 days 60% Divinylbenzene 5 3006 Butyl methacrylate 30 Weak set in 3 days Styrene 65 60% Divinylbenzene 5 14407 Styrene 95 at 75° F - Weak set in 6 days 60% Divinylbenzene 5 1620 at 120° F - 244 min., 3,875 psi (24 hours)8 Styrene 80 at 75° F - 7 psi (24 hours) Methacrylic acid 15 at 120° F - 75 min., 15 psi 824 hours) 1,3 Butylene Dimeth- 5 425 acrylate9 Styrene 70 at 75° F - 27 psi in 24 hours Methacrylic acid 25 at 120° F - 65 min., 105 psi in 24 hours 1,3 Butylene dimeth- 5 275 acrylate10 Styrene 50 at 75° F - 158 psi in 24 hours Methacrylic acid 15 at 120° F - 27 min., 27 psi in Methyl methacrylate 30 hours 1,3 Butylene dimeth- 5 352 acrylate11 Styrene 80 at 75° F - 14 psi in 24 hours Methacrylic acid 15 at 120° F -38 min, 35 psi in 60% Divinylbenzene 5 1 24 hours13 Styrene 50 at 75° F - 700 psi in 24 hours Methacrylic acid 15 at 120° F - 40 min., in 3,878 psi Methyl methacrylate 30 24 hours 60% Divinylbenzene 5 160__________________________________________________________________________ *Ethyl acetate is a solvent not a monomer.
Test 7 is the control test. It shows that it is difficult to obtain a set with styrene and divinylbenzene alone at low temperatures such as 75° F.
The methacrylate esters Tests 4, 5, and 6 yield only modest aid in speeding up the gel time. However, methacrylic acid gives definite aid in speeding up gel time in Test Test 9 through 13.
TABLE VII__________________________________________________________________________Low Temperature Tests Peroxide- Compressive Promoter Gel Time StrengthTest Monomers, Grams Additional Monomer System Minutes PSI - 24 Hrs.No. STY DVB MAA Chemical Grams 1 Gm. Ea. 75° F 120° F 75° F 120° F__________________________________________________________________________1 80 5 15 None 0 BZW-70 231 38 14 35 DMA2 70 5 25 None 0 BZW-70 120 20 1401 2,366 DMA3 65 5 30 None 0 BZW-70 90 20 200 1,926 DMA4 50 5 15 MMA 20 BZW-70 160 40 7002 70 DMA5 65 5 30 None 0 t-BH-70 2,200 250 Gel3 13,953 CoN6 33 5 22 None 0 FR-222 >480 95 1,024 2,219 CoN7 65 5 30 None 0 FR-2224 164 26 2,604 9,878 CoN48 90 11 0 None 0 t-BH-70 2,200 300 Gel3 1707 CoN9 54 5 31 ACN 11 FR-222 298 27 3,482 7,9295 CoN10 40 5 0 DBF 55 FR-222 202 40 Gel6 Gel6 CoN__________________________________________________________________________ 1 at 100° 2,230 psi. 2 at 100° 3,878 psi. 3 48 hr. set. 4 FR-222: 2 grams, CoN: 2 grams. 5 This set was damaged by boiling. At 200° the strength was 10,316 psi. 6These sets ultimately made a good rubber in 5 days. 7 180° : Gel time - 40 mins; 24 hr. compressive strength - 10,352 psi.
Tests 6 and 7 indicate that with the proper Peroxide-Promoter System that the 75° F compressive strength can be raised to a respectable level.
TABLE VIII______________________________________Survey of Possible Room Temperature PolymerizationsUsing Divinylbenzene______________________________________Formula: Styrene Variable Divinylbenzene 5.0 g Copolymer 1 Variable Copolymer 2 Variable 6% Cobalt Naphthenate 1.0 g Dimethylamiline 1.0 g t-BH-70 1.0 gMixing Sequence: In the above orderTemperature: 72-74° F Latent CompressiveTest Formula Tested Time StrengthNo. Chemical Grams Minutes Hours PSI______________________________________1 Styrene 65.0 24 3.231Methacrylic acid 30.0 154a 96 4,2512 Styrene 65.0 88b 24 8,928Methacrylic acid 30.0 48 8,9283 Styrene 65.0 32b 24 8,503Acrylic acid 30.0 96 8,5034 Styrene 65.0Acrylic acid 15.0 197 24 10,629cAcrylonitrile 15.0 96 9,778c5 Styrene 65.0 137b 24 8,120Acrylonitrile 30.0 96 9,6086 Styrene 60.0 24 2,040Acrylonitrile 35.0b 102b 48 3,1467 Styrene 55.0 24 1,445Acrylonitrile 40.0 109b 48 2,8068 Styrene 52.1 24 935Acrylonitrile 42.7 101b 48 1,5309 Styrene 34.5Vinyl acetate 28.6 >1440 24 0Maleic anhydride 31.9 1,70010 Styrene 0Maleic anhydride 50Vinyl acetate 45 Never 96 011 Styrene 0Vinyl acetate 95 Never 96 012 Styrene 0Triallyl phosphate 5e Never 96 013 Styrene 02-Ethylhexylacrylate 95 Never 96 014 Styrene 02-ethylhexylmethacrylate 95 Never 96 0______________________________________ a FR-222, 0.5 g, and t-BH-70, 0.5 g, were substituted for t-BH-70, 1.0 g. b FR-222 was substituted for t-BH-70. c The set was cracked. d The divinylbenzene was increased to 10 g. e Triallyl phosphate was substituted for divinylbenzene. f "Never" is to the limit of observation which was about 96 hours.
TABLE IX__________________________________________________________________________Gel Time Control Tests With AcrylonitrileFormulation: 60% divinylbenzene - 5 grams; FR-222 - 1 gram; 6% cobaltnaphthenate - 1 gram MonomersTest Grams Gel Time, Minutes at ° F Compressive Strength - PSI in 24 HoursfNo. STY ACN 70 100 130 140 160 70 100 120 140 160__________________________________________________________________________1 95 0 5,000 800 220 115 63 0 71 9,006 12,550 13,1662 93 2 1,800 315 150 -- -- 10 153b 10,302 -- --3 90 5 630 214 109 54 22 30 2,942 9,997 12,441 12,5764 85 10 445 170 85 49 27 139b 4,871 11,222 12,080 15,3225 75 20 300 103 53 34 14 2,150 10,668a 10,280a 7,280a 3,334a6 65 30 215 68 40 -- -- 10,378 5,932a 5,675a -- --7 75 20c 600 115 58 25 15 3,973 7,432 9,778 6,160a 792a8 75 20d -- -- 600 117 42 0 0 1,380b 9,420 3,196a9 75 20e 600 117 60 37 25 120 6,336 11,298 11,883 12,927__________________________________________________________________________ a The set was damaged by boiling due to heat of polymerization. b Rubbery. c Only 0.5 grams 6% cobalt naphthenate used. d There was no 6% cobalt naphthenate used. e The catalyst system was halved; 0.5 grams FR-222 and 0.5 grams 6% cobalt naphthenate were used. f The samples were cured at the temperature ° F indicated but tested at room temperature (73° F).
In Table IX, it can be seen that a gel time and compressive strength system can be made by varying the acrylonitrile-styrene ratio; note the orderly series with Tests 1 through 6. Also, Tests 7, 8 and 9 show that with additional manipulation of the promoter-initiator system that greater flexibility is possible.
TABLE X__________________________________________________________________________Fillers for Preventing ShrinkageFormulation: Styrene - 95 grams; 60% divinylbenzene - 5 grams; 6% cobaltnaphthenate - 1 gram. - CompressiveTest Initiator Additives Temp. Gel Time Strength ShrinkageNo. 1 gram Material Grams ° F Minutes PSI-24 Hrs. Diameter %__________________________________________________________________________1 t-BH-70 None 0 80 1,440 5 0 120 330 150 1.6 160 120 12,602 4.2 180 60 13,890 5.02 t-BH-70 Silica flour (270 mesh) 340 80 >5,000 -- -- Attapulgite 5 120 >400 7,990a 0.3 160 230 13,554a 0.6 180 60 12,1271 0.33 FR-222 None 0 80 <1,220 26 0.7 100 420 315 4.9 120 209 9.230 5.9 140 165 10,455 7.3 160 68 12,222 3.34 FR-222 Silica flour (270 mesh) 291c 80 600 212 0 Attapulgite 5 120 240 7.097 6.8 160 120 11,004 0.9 180 60 3,605 6.95 FR-222 Silica flour (270 mesh) 192c 75 <1,100 4 0 Attapulgite 6.9 100 <1,100 7 0 120 1,100 190 3.3 140 >200 `2,465 1.7 160 120 9.956 1.1 180 40 12,056 7.36 FR-222 Methacrylic 75 -- 9.677 2.9 Acid 30b 120 -- 5,495 2.9 Silica flour (270 mesh) 154c 160 -- 11,020 2.5 Attapulgite 3.6 180 -- 4,494 0.42__________________________________________________________________________ a Five day test for both compressive strength and shrinkage. b The methacrylic acid was substituted for 30 grams of the styrene. c This is all of the silica flour that could be added and still have a pumpable slurry.
When the monomer system of this invention is placed in vugs and cracks as contrasted to capillary systems, it is desirable to reduce the shrinkage caused by polymerization. This is done by using fillers. In Table X, it can be seen that the shrinkages in Test 2 are considerably less than the corresponding runs in Test 1. The purpose of the attapulgite is to prevent the ground silica flour filler from sedimentating.
TABLE XI______________________________________Strengthening Silica Filled Polymers By Including AReactive Binding Agent In The Silica-Monomer Slurry______________________________________Formula. Divinylbenzene5 grams Styrene65 grams Acrylonitrile30 grams 6% Cobalt naphthenate1 gram N,N-Dimethylaniline1 gram 70% I-Butyl hydroperoxide1 gram Reactive Compressive StrengthTes Silica* Content Binding PSI in 24 HoursNo. Per Formula Unit Agent** 80° F 100° F 120° F______________________________________1 None None 7,088 10,581 6,3472 340 g None 1,626 9.492 12,7593 None 1 g 11,044 11,417 6,4924 340 g 1 g 17,656 20,298 25,373______________________________________ *The silica is 270 mesh. **The Reactive Binding Agent is methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane.
Certain organosilicon compounds promote adhesion between silica flour and organic polymers. Examples are gammaglycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane and cloropropyltrimethoxysilane. However, in this invention it is preferred to use a binding agent (adhesion promoter) with a reactive double bond in it so that it can participate in polymerization with the other monomers and thus firmly stitch the polymer to the silica by continuous chemical bonds. Examples are vinyltrichlorosilane, vinyltriethoxysilane, vinyltrimethoxysilane, and gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane. Table XI demonstrates that there is a definite improvement in compressive strength of the polymerized slurry (compare Test 2 with Test 4) when the binding agent is used. The binding agent should also promote adhesion to the formation surface. Because of this the binding agent is useful even when no filler is used.
TABLE XII__________________________________________________________________________Test of Surfactants and Other Additives UsingFR-222 In The FormulaFormula:Styrene65 gramsDivinylbenzene5 gramsAcrylic Acid30 grams6% Cobalt naphthenate1 gramsAdditiveVariableFR-2221 gramSilica flourVariableMixing Sequence: as listed aboveTemperature: 73° F Silica Latent Flour Compressive StrengthTest Additives Used Timea Maximum SilicaNo. Chemical Grams Minutes Grams Neat With Flour__________________________________________________________________________ 1 Acrylonitrileb 30 171 269 4,115 5,144 2 Control -- 74 196 6,462 8,545 3 Calcium carbonatec -- 74 140c 6,462 10,204 4 Oleic Acid 1 94 230 6,292 10,204 5 9-11 Acid 1 96 198 5,952 10,204 6 A-151 1 87 228 8,503 11,054 7 Redicote 80-S 1 98 340 5,697 8.078 8 Redicote 80-S 1 102 340 6,037 7,653 6,547d 9.056d 9 Redicote 80-S 1 100 340 3,656 14,030 A-174 7,185d 14,880d10 A-174 1 76 223 6,207 13,32911 Methacrylic Acidg 30 Redicote 80-S 1 330 340 Rubbery Rubbery A-174 1 425d 9,353d Dimethylaniline 112 Dimethylaniline 1 Primine JMT 1 32 291 1,275e 11,904f13 Dimethylaniline 1 Primine 81-R 1 -- 275 -- 11,90014 Methacrylic Acidg 30 Dimethylaniline 1 87h -- 8,759h -- 9.034h,d --15 Acetylacetone 1 62 -- 11,054 -- 11,479d16 Acetylacetone 1 Cobalt Benzoatei 0.2 74 -- 12,755 -- 12,750d17 Acetylacetone 1 Cobalt benzoatei 0.2 Dimethylaniline 1 19 -- 6,377f -- 4,676f,d --18 Acetylacetone 1 Cobalt benzoatei 1 Dimethylaniline 1 16 -- 9.608f 8,928f,d__________________________________________________________________________ a Latent time was obtainable for the neat (without silica flour) material only. b Acrylonitrile was substituted for acrylic acid. c Calcium carbonate was substituted for silica flour. Test 3 used th same masterbatch as Test 2. d Methacrylic acid was substituted was acrylic acid. e There was an unset layer on top. f The sample was cracked. g Methacrylic acid was substituted for acrylic acid. h This is the average of four tests. i Cobalt benzoate was substituted was 6% cobalt naphthenate.
TABLE XIII__________________________________________________________________________Tests of Surfactants with t-BH-70 In The FormulaTemperature - 77° fFormula: Styrene65 grams Divinylbenzene 5 grams Acrylic acid30 grams 6% cobalt naphthenate 1 gram AdditiveVariable Dimethylaniline 1 gram t-BH-70 1 gram Silica Latent Flour Compressive StrengthTest Additives Used Timea Maximum SilicaNo. Chemical Grams Minutes Grams Neat With Flour__________________________________________________________________________1 Acrylonitrileb 30 473 301 3,018 4672 Acrylonitrileb 30 A-151* 1 474 340 2,721 4673 Controe -- 86 220 4,591c 10,013 6,059c,d 12,389d4 Dimethylaniline 0 1440 230 No set No set Rubberd Rubberd5 Redicote 80-S 1 209 340 3,401c 9.948 11,462c,d 13,180d6 Redicote 80-S 1 A-174** 1 159 340 3,826e 16,666 6,460e 19.882d7 A-174 1 161 237 --f 12,414c 3,401e,d 16,156d,c__________________________________________________________________________ a Latent time was obtainable with neat (without silica flour) only. b Acrylonitrile was substituted for acrylic acid. c Specimen was slightly cracked. d This is a 48 hour test. e This test is an average of three runs. *A-151 is vinyltriethoxysilane. **A-174 is gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane.
TABLE XIV______________________________________ Sealing Tests in Sand Parts byChemicals Weight Purpose______________________________________60% Divinylbenzene 5 CrosslinkerStyrene 95 Monomer6% cobalt naphthenate 1 PromoterN,N-dimethylaniline 1 Promoter70% t-butyl hydroperoxide 1 InitiatorThe above formula gave the following results: Compressive StrengthTemperature 96 Hours, PSI______________________________________ 75° F 7,992100° F 10,298120° F 12,134______________________________________
When injected into a water producing 70-170 mesh sand with a permeability of approximately 10 darcies, the results were 99.61% and 99.95% water shut off for two tests (170° F in 24 hours).
TABLE XV__________________________________________________________________________Aging Tests at 300° FChemical Batch I Batch IIa__________________________________________________________________________Styrene 950 grams 950 grams60% divinylbenzene 50 grams 50 grams6% cobalt naphthenate 10 grams 10 gramst-BH-70 10 grams 10 gramsSilica (270 mesh) 0 grams 3400 grams__________________________________________________________________________ The above batches were cased into 2.16 cm diameter columns and curedat 180° F. Then the columns were cut into 4.4 cm samples and agedat 300° F.Each sample was weighted, micrometer measured, and marked for identitybeforeit was placed in water in the 300° F autoclave.Batch I (No Silica) Batch IIa (With Silica)Compressive CompressiveDays ofStrength % Weight % Volume Strength % Weight % VolumeAgingPSIc Retained Retained PSIc Retained Retained__________________________________________________________________________ 0b13,700 100.0 100.0 10.963 100.0 100.01 12,130 100.4 100.1 9,730 100.3 101.42 11,940 100.4 97.7 9,370 100.7 101.38 12,560 100.4 100.5 9,360 101.4 101.319 13,715 100.4 99.4 9,695 101.2 99.672 11,400 99.9 99.4 8,400 101.6 101.9201 13,116 100.0 100.6 10,346 101.4 99.7305 13,718 99.9 98.9 10,426 101.4 99.4Average12,790 100.15 99.6 9,790 101.0 100.6__________________________________________________________________________ a Actually only half this amount of Batch II was mixed because of th increased volume resulting from the silica filler. b 24 hour cure at 180° F only. c Cooled to room temperature. Table XV shos that compositions and methods of this invention can produc a sealing material that has no significant deterioration at high temperature in almost a year. The % weight retained in Batch II indicates that the silica filler is not a source of water entry into the material.
TABLE XVI______________________________________ Cobalt Complexing AgentFormula: Chemical Grams Styrene 65.0 Divinylbenzene 5.0 Acrylic acid* 30.0 Ligand 1.0 5% cobalt naphthenate 1.0 FR-222 1.0Temperature: 73° FMixing Sequence: as listed in the formula above. Sedi- ColorTest Ligand Tested ment SetNo. Solubility Set mm Resin______________________________________1 8-hydroxyguinoline Good No -- --2 dimethylglyoxime Good No -- --3 tetramethylthiuramnonosulfide Poor No -- --4 tetraethylthiuramdisulfite Good No -- --5 diphenylthiocarbazone Fair No -- --6 p-nitrosophenol Very poor No -- --7 nitrilotriacetic acid Very poor No -- --8 p-nitrophenol Poor Yes 6 Yellow- red9 o-nitrophenol Good No -- --10 salicylic acid Good Yes 5 Clear11 1-nitroso-2-naphthol Fair No -- --12 ethyl acetoacetate Good Yes 7 Clear13 ethylenedinitrilo-tetracetic acid Very poor No -- --14 2-nitropropane Good Yes 5 Clear16 Control (nothing) -- Yes 6 Clear17 acetylactone Good Yes 2 Green18 acetylacetone** Good 90% 4 Yellow______________________________________ *Methacrylic acid was substituted for acrylic acid in Tests 6 through 18. **The cobalt naphthenate and acetylacetone were mixed before adding.
When the formula is squeezed into a wet sand, the cobalt plates out on the sand. Lack of cobalt in the lower part of the injected interval causes a failure to polymerize. A chelating agent such as acetylacetone (also called 2,4-pentanedione) controls the dispersibility of the initiator and/or promoter in the polymerization mixture in the presence of materials which would cause the initiator to separate from the mixture.