Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Facility
Accuracy of STEM Mass Measurements
Expected Accuracy of STEM Mass Measurements
Choice of radius of integration is important because too small a radius may cut off part of the mass while too large a radius adds pixels with only background, increasing the total number of counts without adding signal. If the sample is crowded, a large radius may include parts of adjacent objects. A plot of mass vs. radius of integration for an isolated particle with a well-defined edge on a clean background should increase rapidly, plateau, then oscillate with increasing amplitude. PCMass makes it easy to study this in several ways (see Tutorial 1). The on-screen measuring circle or rectangle shows what pixels are being included in the measurement. The zoom display shows the integrated mass and a trace of average signal as a function of radius of integration (changed by T/Y keys). The numerical values can be viewed by striking the 'TAB' key.
Typical STEM beam current gives 1,000 electrons incident on each pixel (10A pixels with a dose of 10 el/A2). Of those, 5-10% are scattered. For a TMV segment 360A long and a measuring width of 220A, this would give ~80,000 electrons scattered with a standard deviation (SD) of 280. However, roughly half the scattered electrons come from the TMV, giving an uncertainty of 280/40,000=0.7%. Increasing the dose improves statistics but damages the specimen (2.5% mass loss per 10 el/A2 of dose) and blurs the edge of the particle, requiring a wider measuring area. Smaller and/or thinner objects give larger SD with a practical cutoff of ~20% for compact 30kDa proteins at 10el/A2.
Carbon Film Noise
This is mainly important for single atom imaging at very high dose. At normal dose the carbon film noise is negligible compared to counting statistics. The background program attempts to mask all particles and measure background in the remaining “clean” areas. As discussed in Q3, any non-uniform residue between or underneath particles can generate serious errors.
A practical approach to determine the overall accuracy of a series of mass measurements is discussed in Tutorial 8.
Last Modified: June 12, 2009