Originally posted by crusader
Most of those arguments still will not convince me on this issue on interacial dating.
Interesting, that's not a definition of race.
Ask me why I have so much hatred against interacial marriages.
We already know, you're a racist.
First Interacial marriages/dating whatever is a fad, a myth, whatever you want to call it, and not everyone is going to jump in this stupid
So now you know the minds of everyone doing this eh? And whats this about it being a fad? If anything, the fad was the recent prohibitions against
it. In human history, interbreeding has been more of the norm than the exception.
and you were in a loving relationship, it is wrong..... very wrong,
You do realize that you share basically the same mentality of the people that enslaved your own, right? I mean, obviously not precisely the same
mentality, but still, how's it feel to have so much in common with them??
You know what disgusts me?
Other races and people that are different, we know, we know.
what will become of both genes of the two parents?
Precisely the same thing that will happen if they are of different race. Do you not understand inheritence and genetics???
you people certainly don't understand RACe, the dimensions, the deep spiritual aspects of keeping the bloodline and your racial STock pure,
Well excuse us for not being akin to nazis.
what is so racist about wanting to marry your own kind?
If your decision is based on race then its racist. Duh.
There's a significant diffrence between black and white
No. There isn't. Infact, there's practically no difference at all.
yea, I support them, 100%
And will you support them when they lock up blacks into concentration camps and exterminate them?
These girls are white nationalists, not
'merely' people who are proud of their heritage, they want to destroy other races, remove them from the white nation.
I want an African?Black princess! Hell Yea!!
Then move to africa, because the people in the US are americans. Any black woman that you marry in the US has white genes, because the two races have
been intermixing for quite some time now. And, similarly, black genes have flowed out of the black american population and into the white american
race exists as a biological entity
And each breed has its own defining characteristics and predisposition to problems medically
They don't. Being black doesn't mean that you are more susptible to sickle cell, for example, sickle cell is determined by genetics that are
independant of race, as are other hereditary diseases. Are you saying that if a person isn't more suseptible to certain types of heart disease, that
they then aren't black??
It has been found in many studies that different drugs and medications are not metabolized the same by whites. blacks, and asians
This actually isn't true. Its a problem of being too inspecific. Whats actually been found is that there are a lot of people, who self-identify as
black, that metabolize a drug different than most people who self-identify as white, not that all white people metabolize it differently than blacks.
I myself have no real interest in dating outside my race, although I have dated persons of mixed race
If you won't date someone because of their race, you're a racist, just like if you won't let someone live in your town becuase of race, or hire
someone because of race. If race is the determining factor, then its a racist decision. you're saying that you tend to not be attracted to, say,
most black women, not that the full spectrum of black women are invariantly unattractive to you, or white women, men, whatever.
But I say again, simply because a person dates exclusively within their own race does not make them haters.
Simply because a person hasn't dated outside their supposed race doesn't mean that they are racist, agreed, one doesn't need to be a racist to just
happened to have not dated someone outside their race. Its the 'why' answer that is determinant here. If its just that you, despite say having
known a good mix of different people, just haven't found yourself attracted to the people outide your race, then who is anyone to say that you are
racist? But if you say 'all of that race are undateable', well, its racist.
and there really never was much discrimination against europeans in America,
Tell that to the irish who got brought over to the US and were put to work in places that people didn't want to 'waste' their slaves on. Or tell
that to the catholics who couldn't, and sometimes still can't, run for office without being said to be pawns of the pope. Or tell it to the germans
and eastern europeans who were looked upon as socialist radicals who had to be monitored. Or tell it to the italians who weren't allowed to buy
houses in anglo neighbhorhoods.
I wouldn't pretend that europeans had it worse off than blacks, they definitly got the shaft, but lets not ignore that other groups have been on the
receiving end of some pretty vulgar bigotry and racism.
There were never any pure races in the world anyway except assumingly when the races were originally created
Thats the thing, the 'races' were never created, there was just a spectrum of human variety, and at certain times one group or another said 'anyone
falling within this range is anathema and impure'.
is globally out of control by mass proportions
What the heck does 'outof control' mean? As if there is some montrous mongrellized horde that has to be protected against. And you're simply
wrong about there not being english in england or germans in germany. Blacks in the US, for example, represent 12-14 percent of the popolation, which
is pretty large for a minority, whereas non anglos in england are far far less, and turks in germany are far far less. Sure, everony in germany lover
donner kabobs, but that doesn't mean that they're all turks.
The Turks, btw, are an excellent example of why race is bs. The Turks are a people originally from central asia, who speak an asian language, who
migrated explosively out of central asia and into the middle east and asia minor. IOW, they were asians. Nowadays, the Turks are compleletely
'different' and most people can't tell the difference between them and arabs. Just across the hellespont from the turks are the greeks. Sure,
they're considered caucasian, but they're far more different from anglos and finlanders than they are from supposedly different racially Turks, just
across their border. Indeed, the greeks share far more genes with the turks and cypriots and other eastern mediterrenean people than with the fins or
swedes or irish.
is globally out of control by mass proportions
Because they'd like to identify with being 'italian', and they define italian in a non-logical non-systematic and irrational way that suits their
own needs. People that live in what is now albania sometimes refer to themselves as italians. Indeed, what makes one 'italian', if it can be
anything outside of living in italy? There is no rational definition.
their own then we should refer to our roots also, (Welsh, English, Scottish, Irish).
So go ahead, no one is stopping you from saying "I'm Scotch Australian".
Well, Italian is not a race, as Welsh, Scottish, German, and French are not. They are cultures, national identities.
Sure, they're cultures and national identities, today. In the past, they were races. The Scots were a race, considered inferior to the english race.
The irish were a race, the gauls, another race. The Romans considered the German race to be far inferior to their own Latin race, when they were in
power. And then when the 'germans' invaded and occupied italy they consiered the puny italians to be far inferior to their own race.
Kings from around the world since the beginning of civilizations only married into other royal families, or noble families
yes, other nobles, regardless of their race. The kings of spain was ruling the netherlands for a while, even tho people in the netherlands considered
spainards to be a different race. The nobles of austria, mainly germanic, would marry into the hungarian nobles, who were of a different race. There
is no traidition to preserve here.