That's not an argument. I'm asking WHAT you see that leads you to the conclusion you make.
I don't support Gingrich, though I don't think I'd describe him as a "Neocon." And why does being rich preclude one from pursuing policies that help the middle class? If anything, Romney's proposals are more directed at the middle class than his less "well off" opponents.
The moon base thing is the kind of erratic Gingrich comment I'm talking about, and it's one reason I don't support him over Romney. That said, I don't think it's "just for votes." He's been talking about stuff like that for a long time.
Back to the real topic: Why is Obama better than Romney?
How is it different? In fact, the Gingrich quote should be far less offensive. Spanish is OFTEN the language of the ghetto. "Typical white person" is highly subjective and shows true racial bias.
Because he's not a cheer leader for the rich. Romney represents everything that's not popular in this country right now. Rich and out of touch. Newt ( Mr. Neocon ) is an idiot that has so much baggage he's an easy target. Take your pick.