Date: Apr 6, 2013 3:29 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
In article <A2P7t.14440$yV1.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Nam Nguyen <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 12:08 AM, Virgil wrote:
> > In article <bWN7t.281592$O52.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> > Nam Nguyen <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> On 05/04/2013 10:31 PM, Virgil wrote:
> >>> In article <VFM7t.356449$PC7.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> >>> Nam Nguyen <email@example.com> wrote:
> >>>> Then you don't seem to understand the nature of cGC, depending on the
> >>>> formulation of the Conjecture but being a _different_ formula.
> >>>> For GC (the Goldbach conjecture), there naturally are 2 cases:
> >>> What if the GC is eventually proved true in all systems?
> >> What do you mean by "all" systems?
> > At least all systems in which a set of positive naturals with the usual
> > forms of addition and multiplication are possible.
> What do you mean by "positive naturals", "usual forms", "possible"?
> That's way too "intuitive" to conclude anything definitely, right?
The naturals nowadays can either include zero or not, and zero is not a
Are you really not familiar with the usual forms of addition and
multiplication as they are understood for natural numbers?