Plants and seeds of corn variety 1501150
||Plants and seeds of corn variety 1501150
||October 19, 2004
||January 25, 2002
||Floyd; Michael L. (Atlanta, IN)
||DeKalb Genetics Corporation (DeKalb, IL)|
|Attorney Or Agent:
||Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
||435/412; 435/424; 435/430.1; 435/468; 800/268; 800/274; 800/278; 800/300; 800/300.1; 800/301; 800/302; 800/303; 800/320.1
|Field Of Search:
||435/410; 435/412; 435/424; 435/430; 435/430.1; 435/468; 800/260; 800/266; 800/268; 800/275; 800/278; 800/303; 800/320.1; 800/300; 800/300.1; 800/301; 800/302; 800/274
|U.S Patent Documents:
||3903645; 4368592; 4517763; 4581847; 4594810; 4607453; 4626610; 4629819; 4642411; 4654466; 4658084; 4658085; 4677246; 4731499; 4737596; 5276263; 5523520; 6211447
|Foreign Patent Documents:
||Eshed et al., Genetics, 1996, vol. 143, pp. 1807-1817.*.
Kraft et al., Theor. Appl. Genet., 2000, vol. 101, pp. 323-326.*.
Armstrong & Green, "Establishment and Maintenance of Friable Embryogenic Maize Callus and the Involvement of L-Proline," Planta, 164:207-214, 1985..
Beckmann and Soller, "Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms in Plant Genetic Improvement," Oxfors Surveys of Plant Molecular & Cell Biology, 3:196-250, 1986..
Conger et al., "Somatic Embryogenesis from Cultured Leaf Segments of Zea Mays," Plant Cell Reports, 6:345-347, 1987..
Duvick, "Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of U.S. Hybrid Maize, 1930 to 1980," Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants: Proceedings of a Symposium sponsored by Div. C-1, Crop Science Society of America, Dec. 2, 1981 inAtlanta, Georgia; W.R. Fehr, Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 15-47..
Edallo et al., "Chromosomal Variation and Frequency of Spontaneous Mutation Associated with in vitro Culture and Plant Regeneration in Maize," Maydica, 26:39-56, 1981..
Fehr (ed.), Principles of Cultivar Development, vol. 1: Theory and Technique, pp. 360-376, 1987..
Gaillard et al., "Optimization of maize microspore isolation and culture condition for reliable plant regeneration," Plant Cell Reports, 10(2):55, 1991..
Gerdes and Tracy, "Diversity of historically important sweet corn inbredsas estimated by rflp's, morphology, isozymes, and pedigree," Crop Science, 34(1):26-33, 1994..
Gordon-Kamm et al., "Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants," The Plant Cell, 2:603-618, 1990..
Green & Phillips, "Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize," Crop Science, 15:417-421, 1975..
Green & Rhodes, "Plant regeneration in tissue cultures of maize," Maize for Biological Research, ed. W.F. Sheridan, A Special Publication of the Plant Molecular Biology Association, pp. 367-372, 1982..
Hallauer et al., "Corn Breeding," Corn and Corn Improvement, eds., Sprague et al., Madison, Wisconsin, Ch. 8, 3rd Ed. pp. 463-564, 1988..
Larson & Hanway, "Corn Production," Corn and Corn Improvement, ed. G.F. Sprague, No. 18 in Agronomy Series, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 625-669, 1977..
Meghji et al., "Inbreeding depression, inbred and hybrid grain yields, and other traits of maize genotypes representing three eras," Crop Science, 24:545-549, 1984..
Pace et al., "Anther culture of maize and the visualization of embryogenic microspores by fluorescent microscopy," Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 73:863-869, 1987..
Phillips et al., "Cell/tissue culture and in vitro manipulation," Corn and Corn Improvement, eds., Sprague et al., 3rd ed. Ch. 5, pp. 345-387, 1988..
Poehlman & Sleper (eds), Breeding Field Crops, 4th Ed., pp. 172-175, 1995..
Poehlman, Breeding Field Crops, 3rd ed., AVI Publishing Company, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 469-481, 1987..
Rao et al., "Somatic embryogenesis in glume callus cultures," Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, vol. 60, 1986..
Rhodes et al., Genetically transformed maize plants from protoplasts, Science, 240:204-207, 1988..
Rieger et al., Glossary of Genetics and Cytogenetics, Classical and Molecular, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 116, 1976..
Smith and Smith, "Restriction fragment length polymorphisms can differentiate among U.S. maize hybrids," Crop Sci, 31:893-899, 1991..
Sprague & Eberhart, "Corn Breeding," Corn and Corn Improvements, ed. G.F. Sprague, No. 18 in Agronomy Series, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 305-323, 1977..
Troyer, "A retrospective view of corn genetic resources," Journal of Heredity, 81:17-24, 1990..
Wright, "Commercial hybrid seed," Hybridization of Crop Plants, Fehr et al., eds. Am. Soc. of agron.-Crop Sci. Soc. of Am., Madison, Wisconsin, Ch. 8, pp. 161-176, 1980..
Wych, "Production of hybrid seed corn," Corn and Corn Improvement, eds., Sprague et al, editors, Madison, Wisconsin, Ch. 9, 3rd Ed. pp. 565-607, 1988..
||According to the invention, there is provided seed and plants of the corn variety designated I501150. This invention thus relates to the plants, seeds and tissue cultures of the variety I501150, and to methods for producing a corn plant produced by crossing a corn plant of variety I501150 with itself or with another corn plant, such as a plant of another variety. This invention further relates to corn seeds and plants produced by crossing plants of variety I501150 with plants of another variety, such as another inbred line, and to crosses with related species. This invention further relates to the inbred and hybrid genetic complements of plants of variety I501150, and also to the SSR and isozyme typing profiles of corn variety I501150.
||What is claimed is:
1. A seed of the corn variety I501150, wherein a sample of the seed of the corn variety I501150 was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489.
2. A corn plant produced by growing a seed of the corn variety I501150, wherein a sample of the seed of the corn variety I501150 was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489.
3. A plant part of the corn plant of claim 2.
4. The plant part of claim 3, further defined as pollen.
5. The plant part of claim 3, further defined as an ovule.
6. The plant part of claim 3, further defined as a cell.
7. A seed comprising the cell of claim 6.
8. A tissue culture comprising the cell of claim 6.
9. A corn plant expressing all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the corn variety I501150, wherein a sample of the seed of the corn variety I501150 was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489.
10. A tissue culture of regenerable cells of a plant of corn variety I501150, wherein the tissue regenerates plants expressing all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the corn variety I501150, wherein a sample of the seed ofthe corn variety I501150 was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489.
11. The tissue culture of claim 10, wherein the regenerable cells comprise cells derived from embryos, immature embryos, meristematic cells, immature tassels, microspores, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, silk, flowers, kernels, ears,cobs, husks, or stalks.
12. The tissue culture of claim 11, wherein the regenerable cells comprise protoplasts or callus cells.
13. A corn plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 10, wherein the corn plant expresses all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the corn variety designated I501150, wherein a sample of the seed of the cornvariety I501150 was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489.
14. A process of producing corn seed, comprising crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant, wherein one or both of the first or the second parent corn plant is a plant of the corn variety I501150, wherein a sample of theseed of the corn variety I501150 was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489, wherein seed is allowed to form.
15. The process of claim 14, further defined as a process of producing hybrid corn seed, comprising crossing a first inbred corn plant with a second, distinct inbred corn plant, wherein the first or second inbred corn plant is a plant of thecorn variety I501150, wherein a sample of the seed of the corn variety I501150 was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489.
16. The process of claim 15, wherein crossing comprises the steps of: (a) planting the seeds of first and second inbred corn plants; (b) cultivating the seeds of said first and second inbred corn plants into plants that bear flowers; (c)preventing self pollination of at least one of the first or second inbred corn plant; (d) allowing cross-pollination to occur between the first and second inbred corn plants; and (e) harvesting seeds on at least one of the first or second inbred cornplants, said seeds resulting from said cross-pollination.
17. A method of producing a male sterile corn plant comprising transforming the corn plant of claim 2 with a nucleic acid molecule that confers male sterility.
18. A male sterile corn plant produced by the method of claim 17.
19. A method of producing an herbicide resistant corn plant comprising transforming the corn plant of claim 2 with a transgene that confers herbicide resistance.
20. An herbicide resistant corn plant produced by the method of claim 19.
21. The corn plant of claim 20, wherein the transgene confers resistance to an herbicide selected from the group consisting of glyphosate, sulfonylurea, and phosphinothricin.
22. A method of producing an insect resistant corn plant comprising transforming the corn plant of claim 2 with a transgene that confers insect resistance.
23. An insect resistant corn plant produced by the method of claim 22.
24. The corn plant of claim 23, wherein the transgene encodes a Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxin.
25. A method of producing a disease resistant corn plant comprising transforming the corn plant of claim 2 with a transgene that confers disease resistance.
26. A disease resistant corn plant produced by the method of claim 25.
27. A method of introducing a desired trait into corn inbred line I501150 comprising: (a) crossing I501150 plants grown from I501150 seed, representative seed of which has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489, with plants of anothercorn line that comprise a desired trait to produce F1 progeny plants, wherein the desired trait is selected from the group consisting of male sterility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, and disease resistance; (b) selecting F1 progeny plantsthat have the desired trait to produce selected F1 progeny plants; (c) crossing the selected progeny plants with the I501150 plants to produce backcross progeny plants; (d) selecting for backcross progeny plants that have the desired trait and traitsof corn inbred line I501150 listed in Table 3 to produce selected backcross progeny plants; and (e) repeating steps (c) and (d) three or more times in succession to produce selected fourth or higher backcross progeny plants that comprise the desiredtrait and all of the traits of corn inbred line I501150 listed in Table 3 as determined at the 5% significance level when grown in the same environmental conditions.
28. A plant produced by the method of claim 27, wherein the plant has the desired trait and all of the traits of corn inbred line I501150 listed in Table 3 as determined at the 5% significance level when grown in the same environmentalconditions.
29. The plant of claim 28, wherein the desired trait is herbicide resistance and the resistance is conferred to an herbicide selected from the group consisting of: sulfonylurea, glyphosate, and phosphinothricin.
30. The plant of claim 28, wherein the desired trait is insect resistance and the insect resistance is conferred by a transgene encoding a Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxin.
31. The plant of claim 28, wherein the desired trait is male sterility and the trait is conferred by a nucleic acid that confers male sterility.
||BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of corn breeding. In particular, the invention relates to inbred corn seed and plants of the variety designated I501150, and derivatives and tissue cultures thereof.
2. Description of Related Art
The goal of field crop breeding is to combine various desirable traits in a single variety/hybrid. Such desirable traits include greater yield, better stalks, better roots, resistance to insecticides, herbicides, pests, and disease, tolerance toheat and drought, reduced time to crop maturity, better agronomic quality, higher nutritional value, and uniformity in germination times, stand establishment, growth rate, maturity, and fruit size.
Breeding techniques take advantage of a plant's method of pollination. There are two general methods of pollination: a plant self-pollinates if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant. A plantcross-pollinates if pollen comes to it from a flower on a different plant.
Corn plants (Zea mays L.) can be bred by both self-pollination and cross-pollination. Both types of pollination involve the corn plant's flowers. Corn has separate male and female flowers on the same plant, located on the tassel and the ear,respectively. Natural pollination occurs in corn when wind blows pollen from the tassels to the silks that protrude from the tops of the ear shoot.
Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type over many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny, a homozygous plant. A cross between two such homozygous plantsproduces a uniform population of hybrid plants that are heterozygous for many gene loci. Conversely, a cross of two plants each heterozygous at a number of loci produces a population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and are not uniform. Theresulting non-uniformity makes performance unpredictable.
The development of uniform corn plant hybrids requires the development of homozygous inbred plants, the crossing of these inbred plants, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection are examples of breedingmethods used to develop inbred plants from breeding populations. Those breeding methods combine the genetic backgrounds from two or more inbred plants or various other broad-based sources into breeding pools from which new inbred plants are developed byselfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new inbreds are crossed with other inbred plants and the hybrids from these crosses are evaluated to determine which of those have commercial potential.
The pedigree breeding method involves crossing two genotypes. Each genotype can have one or more desirable characteristics lacking in the other; or, each genotype can complement the other. If the two original parental genotypes do not provideall of the desired characteristics, other genotypes can be included in the breeding population. Superior plants that are the products of these crosses are selfed and selected in successive generations. Each succeeding generation becomes morehomogeneous as a result of self-pollination and selection. Typically, this method of breeding involves five or more generations of selfing and selection: S.sub.1.fwdarw.S.sub.2 ; S.sub.2.fwdarw.S.sub.3 ; S.sub.3.fwdarw.S.sub.4 ; S.sub.4.fwdarw.S.sub.5,etc. After at least five generations, the inbred plant is considered genetically pure.
Backcrossing can also be used to improve an inbred plant. Backcrossing transfers a specific desirable trait from one inbred or non-inbred source to an inbred that lacks that trait. This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing asuperior inbred (A) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate locus or loci for the trait in question. The progeny of this cross are then mated back to the superior recurrent parent (A) followed byselection in the resultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny are heterozygous for loci controlling the characteristicbeing transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all other loci. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give pure breeding progeny for the trait being transferred.
A single cross hybrid corn variety is the cross of two inbred plants, each of which has a genotype which complements the genotype of the other. The hybrid progeny of the first generation is designated F.sub.1. Typically, F.sub.1 hybrids aremore vigorous than their inbred parents. This hybrid vigor, or heterosis, is manifested in many polygenic traits, including markedly improved yields, better stalks, better roots, better uniformity and better insect and disease resistance. In thedevelopment of hybrids only the F.sub.1 hybrid plants are typically sought. An F.sub.1 single cross hybrid is produced when two inbred plants are crossed. A double cross hybrid is produced from four inbred plants crossed in pairs (A.times.B andC.times.D) and then the two F.sub.1 hybrids are crossed again (A.times.B).times.(C.times.D).
The development of a hybrid corn variety involves three steps: (1) the selection of plants from various germplasm pools; (2) the selfing of the selected plants for several generations to produce a series of inbred plants, which, althoughdifferent from each other, each breed true and are highly uniform; and (3) crossing the selected inbred plants with unrelated inbred plants to produce the hybrid progeny (F.sub.1). During the inbreeding process in corn, the vigor of the plantsdecreases. Vigor is restored when two unrelated inbred plants are crossed to produce the hybrid progeny (F.sub.1). An important consequence of the homozygosity and homogeneity of the inbred plants is that the hybrid between any two inbreds is alwaysthe same. Once the inbreds that give a superior hybrid have been identified, hybrid seed can be reproduced indefinitely as long as the homogeneity of the inbred parents is maintained. Conversely, much of the hybrid vigor exhibited by F.sub.1 hybrids islost in the next generation (F.sub.2). Consequently, seed from hybrid varieties is not used for planting stock. It is not generally beneficial for farmers to save seed of F.sub.1 hybrids. Rather, farmers purchase F.sub.1 hybrid seed for planting everyyear.
North American farmers plant tens of millions of acres of corn at the present time and there are extensive national and international commercial corn breeding programs. A continuing goal of these corn breeding programs is to develop corn hybridsthat are based on stable inbred plants and have one or more desirable characteristics. To accomplish this goal, the corn breeder must select and develop superior inbred parental plants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect, the present invention provides a corn plant of the variety designated I501150. Also provided are corn plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the inbred corn variety I501150. The inbred corn plantof the invention may further comprise, or have, a cytoplasmic or nuclear factor that is capable of conferring male sterility or otherwise preventing self-pollination, such as by self-incompatibility. Parts of the corn plant of the present invention arealso provided, for example, pollen obtained from an inbred plant and an ovule of the inbred plant.
The invention also concerns seed of the inbred corn variety I501150. A sample of this seed has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489. The inbred corn seed of the invention may be provided as an essentially homogeneous population ofinbred corn seed of the variety designated I501150. Essentially homogeneous populations of inbred seed are those that consist essentially of the particular inbred seed, and are generally free from substantial numbers of other seed, so that the inbredseed forms between about 90% and about 100% of the total seed, and preferably, between about 95% and about 100% of the total seed. Most preferably, an essentially homogeneous population of inbred corn seed will contain between about 98.5%, 99%, 99.5%and about 99.9% of inbred seed, as measured by seed grow outs. This corresponds to current commercial practice among the leading companies in the seed industry.
Therefore, in the practice of the present invention, inbred seed generally forms at least about 97% of the total seed. However, even if a population of inbred corn seed was found, for some reason, to contain about 50%, or even about 20% or 15%of inbred seed, this would still be distinguished from the small fraction (generally less than 2% and preferably less than 1%) of inbred seed that may be found within a population of hybrid seed, e.g., within a commercial bag of hybrid seed. In such abag of hybrid seed offered for sale, Federal regulations require that the hybrid seed be at least about 95% of the total seed, or be labeled as a mixture. In the most preferred practice of the invention, the female inbred seed that may be found within abag of hybrid seed will be about 1% of the total seed, or less, and the male inbred seed that may be found within a bag of hybrid seed will be negligible, i.e., will be on the order of about a maximum of 1 per 100,000, and usually less than this value.
The population of inbred corn seed of the invention can further be particularly defined as being essentially free from hybrid seed. The inbred seed population may be separately grown to provide an essentially homogeneous population of inbredcorn plants designated I501150.
In another aspect of the invention, single locus converted plants of variety I501150 are provided. The single transferred locus may preferably be a dominant or recessive allele. Preferably, the single transferred locus will confer such traitsas male sterility, yield stability, waxy starch, yield enhancement, industrial usage, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, resistance to bacterial, fungal, nematode or viral disease, male fertility, and enhanced nutritional quality. The single locusmay be a naturally occurring maize gene introduced into the genome of the variety by backcrossing, a natural or induced mutation, or a transgene introduced through genetic transformation techniques. When introduced through transformation, a single locusmay comprise one or more transgenes integrated at a single chromosomal location.
In yet another aspect of the invention, an inbred corn plant of the variety designated I501150 is provided, wherein a cytoplasmically-inherited trait has been introduced into said inbred plant. Such cytoplasmically-inherited traits are passed toprogeny through the female parent in a particular cross. An exemplary cytoplasmically-inherited trait is the male sterility trait. Cytoplasmic-male sterility (CMS) is a pollen abortion phenomenon determined by the interaction between the genes in thecytoplasm and the nucleus. Alteration in the mitochondrial genome and the lack of restorer genes in the nucleus will lead to pollen abortion. With either a normal cytoplasm or the presence of restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, the plant will producepollen normally. A CMS plant can be pollinated by a maintainer version of the same variety, which has a normal cytoplasm but lacks the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, and continue to be male sterile in the next generation. The male fertility of a CMSplant can be restored by a restorer version of the same variety, which must have the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus. With the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, the offspring of the male-sterile plant can produce normal pollen grains and propagate. Acytoplasmically inherited trait may be a naturally occurring maize trait or a trait introduced through genetic transformation techniques.
In another aspect of the invention, a tissue culture of regenerable cells of a plant of variety I501150 is provided. The tissue culture will preferably be capable of regenerating plants capable of expressing all of the physiological andmorphological characteristics of the variety, and of regenerating plants having substantially the same genotype as other plants of the variety. Examples of some of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the variety I501150 includecharacteristics related to yield, maturity, and kernel quality, each of which is specifically disclosed herein. The regenerable cells in such tissue cultures will preferably be derived from embryos, meristematic cells, immature tassels, microspores,pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, silk, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, or stalks, or from callus or protoplasts derived from those tissues. Still farther, the present invention provides corn plants regenerated from the tissue cultures ofthe invention, the plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of variety I501150.
In yet another aspect of the invention, processes are provided for producing corn seeds or plants, which processes generally comprise crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant, wherein at least one of the first or secondparent corn plants is a plant of the variety designated I501150. These processes may be further exemplified as processes for preparing hybrid corn seed or plants, wherein a first inbred corn plant is crossed with a second corn plant of a different,distinct variety to provide a hybrid that has, as one of its parents, the inbred corn plant variety I501150. In these processes, crossing will result in the production of seed. The seed production occurs regardless of whether the seed is collected ornot.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the first step in "crossing" comprises planting, preferably in pollinating proximity, seeds of a first and second parent corn plant, and preferably, seeds of a first inbred corn plant and a second,distinct inbred corn plant. Where the plants are not in pollinating proximnity, pollination can nevertheless be accomplished by transferring a pollen or tassel bag from one plant to the other as described below.
A second step comprises cultivating or growing the seeds of said first and second parent corn plants into plants that bear flowers. Corn bears both male flowers (tassels) and female flowers (silks) in separate anatomical structures on the sameplant.
A third step comprises preventing self-pollination of the plants, i.e., preventing the silks of a plant from being fertilized by any plant of the same variety, including the same plant. This is preferably done by emasculating the male flowers ofthe first or second parent corn plant, (i.e., treating or manipulating the flowers so as to prevent pollen production, in order to produce an emasculated parent corn plant), Self-incompatibility systems are also used in some hybrid crops for the samepurpose. Self-incompatible plants still shed viable pollen and can pollinate plants of other varieties but are incapable of pollinating themselves or other plants of the same variety.
A fourth step comprises allowing cross-pollination to occur between the first and second parent corn plants. When the plants are not in pollinating proximity, this is done by placing a bag, usually paper or glassine, over the tassels of thefirst plant and another bag over the silks of the incipient ear on the second plant. The bags are left in place for at least 24 hours. Since pollen is viable for less than 24 hours, this assures that the silks are not pollinated from other pollensources, that any stray pollen on the tassels of the first plant is dead, and that the only pollen transferred comes from the first plant. The pollen bag over the tassel of the first plant is then shaken vigorously to enhance release of pollen from thetassels, and the shoot bag is removed from the silks of the incipient ear on the second plant. Finally, the pollen bag is removed from the tassel of the first plant and is placed over the silks of the incipient ear of the second plant, shaken again andleft in place. Yet another step comprises harvesting the seeds from at least one of the parent corn plants. The harvested seed can be grown to produce a corn plant or hybrid corn plant.
The present invention also provides corn seed and plants produced by a process that comprises crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant, wherein at least one of the first or second parent corn plants is a plant of thevariety designated I501150. In one embodiment of the invention, corn seed and plants produced by the process are first generation (F.sub.1) hybrid corn seed and plants produced by crossing an inbred in accordance with the invention with another,distinct inbred. The present invention further contemplates seed of an F.sub.1 hybrid corn plant. Therefore, certain exemplary embodiments of the invention provide an F.sub.1 hybrid corn plant and seed thereof.
In still yet another aspect of the invention, the genetic complement of the corn plant variety designated I501150 is provided. The phrase "genetic complement" is used to refer to the aggregate of nucleotide sequences, the expression of whichsequences defines the phenotype of, in the present case, a corn plant, or a cell or tissue of that plant. A genetic complement thus represents the genetic make up of an inbred cell, tissue or plant, and a hybrid genetic complement represents the geneticmake up of a hybrid cell, tissue or plant. The invention thus provides corn plant cells that have a genetic complement in accordance with the inbred corn plant cells disclosed herein, and plants, seeds and diploid plants containing such cells.
Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic marker profiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits that are characteristic of the expression of the genetic complement, e.g., isozyme typing profiles. Thus, such corn plant cells maybe defined as having an SSR profile in accordance with the profile shown in Table 6, or a genetic isozyme typing profile in accordance with the profile shown in Table 7, or having both an SSR profile and an isozyme typing profile in accordance with theprofiles shown in Table 6 and Table 7. It is understood that variety I501150 could also be identified by other types of genetic markers such as, for example, Simple Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs) (Williams et al., 1990), Randomly AmplifiedPolymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) (EP 534 858, specificallyincorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) (Wang et al., 1998).
In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides hybrid genetic complements, as represented by corn plant cells, tissues, plants, and seeds, formed by the combination of a haploid genetic complement of an inbred corn plant of theinvention with a haploid genetic complement of a second corn plant, preferably, another, distinct inbred corn plant. In another aspect, the present invention provides a corn plant regenerated from a tissue culture that comprises a hybrid geneticcomplement of this invention.
In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of producing an inbred corn plant derived from the corn variety I501150, the method comprising the steps of: (a) preparing a progeny plant derived from corn variety I501150,wherein said preparing comprises crossing a plant of the corn variety I501150 with a second corn plant, and wherein a sample of the seed of corn variety I501150 has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489; (b) crossing the progeny plant withitself or a second plant to produce a seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation; (c) growing a progeny plant of a subsequent generation from said seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation and crossing the progeny plant of a subsequentgeneration with itself or a second plant; and (d) repeating steps (c) and (d) for an addition 3-10 generations to produce an inbred corn plant derived from the corn variety I501150. In the method, it may be desirable to select particular plantsresulting from step (c) for continued crossing according to steps (b) and (c). By selecting plants having one or more desirable traits, an inbred corn plant derived from the corn variety I501150 is obtained which possesses some of the desirable traitsof corn variety I501150 as well potentially other selected traits.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
I. Definitions of Plant Characteristics
Barren Plants: Plants that are barren, i.e., lack an ear with grain, or have an ear with only a few scattered kernels.
Cg: Colletotrichum graminicola rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
CLN: Corn Lethal Necrosis (combination of Maize Chlorotic Mottle Virus and Maize Dwarf Mosaic virus) rating: numerical ratings are based on a severity scale where 1=most resistant to 9=susceptible.
Cn: Corynebacterium nebraskense rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Cz: Cercospora zeae-maydis rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Dgg: Diatraea grandiosella girdling rating (values are percent plants girdled and stalk lodged).
Dropped Ears: Ears that have fallen from the plant to the ground.
Dsp: Diabrotica species root ratings (1=least affected to 9=severe pruning).
Ear-Attitude: The attitude or position of the ear at harvest scored as upright, horizontal, or pendant.
Ear-Cob Color: The color of the cob, scored as white, pink, red, or brown.
Ear-Cob Diameter: The average diameter of the cob measured at the midpoint.
Ear-Cob Strength: A measure of mechanical strength of the cobs to breakage, scored as strong or weak.
Ear-Diameter: The average diameter of the ear at its midpoint.
Ear-Dry Husk Color: The color of the husks at harvest scored as buff, red, or purple.
Ear-Fresh Husk Color: The color of the husks 1 to 2 weeks after pollination scored as green, red, or purple.
Ear-Husk Bract: The length of an average husk leaf scored as short, medium, or long.
Ear-Husk Cover: The average distance from the tip of the ear to the tip of the husks. Minimum value no less than zero.
Ear-Husk Opening: An evaluation of husk tightness at harvest scored as tight, intermediate, or open.
Ear-Length: The average length of the ear.
Ear-Number Per Stalk: The average number of ears per plant.
Ear-Shank Internodes: The average number of internodes on the ear shank.
Ear-Shank Length: The average length of the ear shank.
Ear-Shelling Percent: The average of the shelled grain weight divided by the sum of the shelled grain weight and cob weight for a single ear.
Ear-Silk Color: The color of the silk observed 2 to 3 days after silk emergence scored as green-yellow, yellow, pink, red, or purple.
Ear-Taper (Shape): The taper or shape of the ear scored as conical, semi-conical, or cylindrical.
Ear-Weight: The average weight of an ear.
Early Stand: The percent of plants that emerge from the ground as determined in the early spring.
ER: Ear rot rating (values approximate percent ear rotted).
Final Stand Count: The number of plants just prior to harvest.
GDUs: Growing degree units which are calculated by the Barger Method, where the heat units for a 24-h period are calculated as GDUs=[(Maximum daily temperature+Minimum daily temperature)/2]-50. The highest maximum daily temperature used is86.degree. F. and the lowest minimum temperature used is 50.degree. F.
GDUs to Shed: The number of growing degree units (GDUs) or beat units required for an inbred line or hybrid to have approximately 50% of the plants shedding pollen as measured from time of planting. GDUs to shed is determined by summing theindividual GDU daily values from planting date to the date of 50% pollen shed.
GDUs to Silk: The number of growing degree units for an inbred line or hybrid to have approximately 50% of the plants with silk emergence as measured from time of planting. GDUs to silk is determined by summing the individual GDU daily valuesfrom planting date to the date of 50% silking.
Hc2: Helminthosporium carbonum race 2 rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Hc3: Helminthosporium carbonum race 3 rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Hm: Helminthosporium maydis race 0 rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Ht1: Helminthosporium turcicum race 1 rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Ht2: Helminthosporium turcicum race 2 rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
HtG: Chlorotic-lesion type resistance. +=indicates the presence of Ht chlorotic-lesion type resistance; -=indicates absence of Ht chlorotic-lesion type resistance; and +/-=indicates segregation of Ht chlorotic-lesion type resistance. Ratingtimes 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Kernel-Aleurone Color: The color of the aleurone scored as white, pink, tan, brown, bronze, red, purple, pale purple, colorless, or variegated.
Kernel-Cap Color: The color of the kernel cap observed at dry stage, scored as white, lemon-yellow, yellow, or orange.
Kernel-Endosperm Color: The color of the endosperm scored as white, pale yellow, or yellow.
Kernel-Endosperm Type: The type of endosperm scored as normal, waxy, or opaque.
Kernel-Grade: The percent of kernels that are classified as rounds.
Kernel-Length: The average distance from the cap of the kernel to the pedicel.
Kernel-Number Per Row: The average number of kernels in a single row.
Kernel-Pericarp Color: The color of the pericarp scored as colorless, red-white crown, tan, bronze, brown, light red, cherry red, or variegated.
Kernel-Row Direction: The direction of the kernel rows on the ear scored as straight, slightly curved, spiral, or indistinct (scattered).
Kernel-Row Number: The average number of rows of kernels on a single ear.
Kernel-Side Color: The color of the kernel side observed at the dry stage, scored as white, pale yellow, yellow, orange, red, or brown.
Kernel-Thickness: The distance across the narrow side of the kernel.
Kernel-Type: The type of kernel scored as dent, flint, or intermediate.
Kernel-Weight: The average weight of a predetermined number of kernels.
Kernel-Width: The distance across the flat side of the kernel.
Kz: Kabatiella zeae rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
Leaf-Angle: Angle of the upper leaves to the stalk scored as upright (0 to 30 degrees), intermediate (30 to 60 degrees), or lax (60 to 90 degrees).
Leaf-Color: The color of the leaves 1 to 2 weeks after pollination scored as light green, medium green, dark green, or very dark green.
Leaf-Length: The average length of the primary ear leaf.
Leaf-Longitudinal Creases: A rating of the number of longitudinal creases on the leaf surface 1 to 2 weeks after pollination. Creases are scored as absent, few, or many.
Leaf-Marginal Waves: A rating of the waviness of the leaf margin 1 to 2 weeks after pollination. Rated as none, few, or many.
Leaf-Number: The average number of leaves of a mature plant. Counting begins with the cotyledonary leaf and ends with the flag leaf.
Leaf-Sheath Anthocyanin: A rating of the level of anthocyanin in the leaf sheath 1 to 2 weeks after pollination, scored as absent, basal-weak, basal-strong, weak or strong.
Leaf-Sheath Pubescence: A rating of the pubescence of the leaf sheath. Ratings are taken 1 to 2 weeks after pollination and scored as light, medium, or heavy.
Leaf-Width: The average width of the primary ear leaf measured at its widest point.
LSS: Late season standability (values times 10 approximate percent plants lodged in disease evaluation plots).
Moisture: The moisture of the grain at harvest.
On1: Ostrinia nubilalis 1st brood rating (1=resistant to 9=susceptible).
On2: Ostrinia nubilalis 2nd brood rating (1=resistant to 9=susceptible).
Relative Maturity: A maturity rating based on regression analysis. The regression analysis is developed by utilizing check hybrids and their previously established day rating versus actual harvest moistures. Harvest moisture on the hybrid inquestion is determined and that moisture value is inserted into the regression equation to yield a relative maturity.
Root Lodging: Root lodging is the percentage of plants that root lodge. A plant is counted as root lodged if a portion of the plant leans from the vertical axis by approximately 30 degrees or more.
Seedling Color: Color of leaves at the 6 to 8 leaf stage.
Seedling Height: Plant height at the 6 to 8 leaf stage.
Seedling Vigor: A visual rating of the amount of vegetative growth on a 1 to 9 scale, where 1 equals best. The score is taken when the average entry in a trial is at the fifth leaf stage.
Selection Index: The selection index gives a single measure of hybrid's worth based on information from multiple traits. One of the traits that is almost always included is yield. Traits may be weighted according to the level of importanceassigned to them.
Sr: Sphacelotheca reiliana rating is actual percent infection.
Stalk-Anthocyanin: A rating of the amount of anthocyanin pigmentation in the stalk. The stalk is rated 1 to 2 weeks after pollination as absent, basal-weak, basal-strong, weak, or strong.
Stalk-Brace Root Color: The color of the brace roots observed 1 to 2 weeks after pollination as green, red, or purple.
Stalk-Diameter: The average diameter of the lowest visible internode of the stalk.
Stalk-Ear Height: The average height of the ear measured from the ground to the point of attachment of the ear shank of the top developed ear to the stalk.
Stalk-Internode Direction: The direction of the stalk internode observed after pollination as straight or zigzag.
Stalk-Internode Length: The average length of the internode above the primary ear.
Stalk Lodging: The percentage of plants that did stalk lodge. Plants are counted as stalk lodged if the plant is broken over or off below the ear.
Stalk-Nodes With Brace Roots: The average number of nodes having brace roots per plant.
Stalk-Plant Height: The average height of the plant as measured from the soil to the tip of the tassel.
Stalk-Tillers: The percent of plants that have tillers. A tiller is defined as a secondary shoot that has developed as a tassel capable of shedding pollen.
Staygreen: Staygreen is a measure of general plant health near the time of black layer formation (physiological maturity). It is usually recorded at the time the ear husks of most entries within a trial have turned a mature color. Scoring is ona 1 to 9 basis where 1 equals best.
STR: Stalk rot rating (values represent severity rating of 1=25% of inoculated internode rotted to 9=entire stalk rotted and collapsed).
SVC: Southeastern Virus Complex (combination of Maize Chlorotic Dwarf Virus and Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus) rating; numerical ratings are based on a severity scale where 1=most resistant to 9=susceptible (1988 reactions are largely Maize DwarfMosaic Virus reactions).
Tassel-Anther Color: The color of the anthers at 50% pollen shed scored as green-yellow, yellow, pink, red, or purple.
Tassel-Attitude: The attitude of the tassel after pollination scored as open or compact.
Tassel-Branch Angle: The angle of an average tassel branch to the main stem of the tassel scored as upright (less than 30 degrees), intermediate (30 to 45 degrees), or lax (greater than 45 degrees).
Tassel-Branch Number: The average number of primary tassel branches.
Tassel-Glume Band: The closed anthocyanin band at the base of the glume scored as present or absent.
Tassel-Glume Color: The color of the glumes at 50% shed scored as green, red, or purple.
Tassel-Length: The length of the tassel measured from the base of the bottom tassel branch to the tassel tip.
Tassel-Peduncle Length: The average length of the tassel peduncle, measured from the base of the flag leaf to the base of the bottom tassel branch.
Tassel-Pollen Shed: A visual rating of pollen shed determined by tapping the tassel and observing the pollen flow of approximately five plants per entry. Rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 9 sterile, 1=most pollen.
Tassel-Spike Length: The length of the spike measured from the base of the top tassel branch to the tassel tip.
Test Weight: Weight of the grain in pounds for a given volume (bushel) adjusted to 15.5% moisture.
Yield: Yield of grain at harvest adjusted to 15.5% moisture.
II. Other Definitions
Allele: Any of one or more alternative forms of a gene locus, all of which alleles relate to one trait or characteristic. In a diploid cell or organism the two alleles of a given gene occupy corresponding loci on a pair of homologouschromosomes.
Backcrossing: A process in which a breeder repeatedly crosses hybrid progeny back to one of the parents, for example, a first generation hybrid (F.sub.1) with one of the parental genotypes of the F.sub.1 hybrid.
Chromatography: A technique wherein a mixture of dissolved substances are bound to a solid support followed by passing a column of fluid across the solid support and varying the composition of the fluid. The components of the mixture areseparated by selective elution.
Crossing: The pollination of a female flower of a corn plant, thereby resulting in the production of seed from the flower.
Cross-pollination: Fertilization by the union of two gametes from different plants.
Diploid: A cell or organism having two sets of chromosomes.
Electrophoresis: A process by which particles suspended in a fluid or a gel matrix are moved under the action of an electrical field, and thereby separated according to their charge and molecular weight. This method of separation is well knownto those skilled in the art and is typically applied to separating various forms of enzymes and of DNA fragments produced by restriction endonucleases.
Emasculate: The removal of plant male sex organs or the inactivation of the organs with a chemical agent or a cytoplasmic or nuclear genetic factor conferring male sterility.
Enzymes: Molecules which can act as catalysts in biological reactions.
F.sub.1 Hybrid: The first generation progeny of the cross of two plants.
Genetic Complement: An aggregate of nucleotide sequences, the expression of which sequences defines the phenotype in corn plants, or components of plants including cells or tissue.
Genotype: The genetic constitution of a cell or organism.
Haploid: A cell or organism having one set of the two sets of chromosomes in a diploid.
Isozymes: Detectable variants of an enzyme, the variants catalyzing the same reaction(s) but differing from each other, e.g., in primary structure and/or electrophoretic mobility. The differences between isozymes are under single gene,codominant control. Consequently, electrophoretic separation to produce band patterns can be equated to different alleles at the DNA level. Structural differences that do not alter charge cannot be detected by this method.
Isozyme typing profile: A profile of band patterns of isozymes separated by electrophoresis that can be equated to different alleles at the DNA level.
Linkage: A phenomenon wherein alleles on the same chromosome tend to segregate together more often than expected by chance if their transmission was independent.
Marker: A readily detectable phenotype, preferably inherited in codominant fashion (both alleles at a locus in a diploid heterozygote are readily detectable), with no environmental variance component, i.e., heritability of 1.
I501150: The corn plant variety from which seeds having ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489 were obtained, as well as plants grown from those seeds.
Phenotype: The detectable characteristics of a cell or organism, which characteristics are the manifestation of gene expression.
Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL): Genetic loci that contribute, at least in part, certain numerically representable traits that are usually continuously distributed.
Regeneration: The development of a plant from tissue culture.
SSR profile: A profile of simple sequence repeats used as genetic markers and scored by gel electrophoresis following PCR.TM. amplification using flanking oligonucleotide primers.
Self-pollination: The transfer of pollen from the anther to the stigma of the same plant.
Single Locus Converted (Conversion) Plant: Plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of an inbred are recovered in additionto the characteristics conferred by the single locus transferred into the inbred via the backcrossing technique. A single locus may comprise one gene, or in the case of transgenic plants, one or more transgenes integrated into the host genome at asingle site (locus).
Tissue Culture: A composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of a plant.
Transgene: A genetic sequence which has been introduced into the nuclear or chloroplast genome of a maize plant by a genetic transformation technique.
The following examples are included to demonstrate preferred embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples that follow represent techniques discovered by theinventor to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can bemade in the specific embodiments that are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
III. Inbred Corn Plant I501150
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a novel inbred corn plant variety designated I501150. Inbred corn plant I501150 can be compared to inbred corn plants I754206 and I649539. I501150 differs significantly(at the 1%, 5%, or 10% level) from these inbred lines in several aspects (Table 1 and Table 2).
TABLE 1 Comparison of I501150 with I754206 I501150 I754206 DIFF P VALUE BARREN % 0.5 3.4 -2.9 0.199 EHT INCH 40.3 32.2 8.1 0.039+ FINAL 63.9 61.5 2.4 0.001* MST % 17.6 19.9 -2.3 0.109 PHT INCH 82.9 66.9 16.0 0.001* RTL % 1.3 0.8 0.50.787 SHED GDU 1496.3 1555.8 -59.5 0.487 SILK GDU 1502.2 1551.9 -49.7 0.907 STL % 6.9 1.8 5.1 0.000** YLD BU/A 67.7 77.9 -10.2 0.207 Significance Levels are indicated as: + = 10%, * = 5%, ** = 1%. Legend Abbreviations: BARREN % = Barren Plants(percent) EHT INCH = Ear Height (inches) FINAL = Final Stand MST % = Moisture (percent) PHT INCH = Plant Height (inches) RTL % = Root Lodging (percent) SHED GDU = GDUs to Shed SILK GDU = GDUs to Silk STL % = Stalk Lodging (percent) YLD BU/A =Yield (bushels/acre)
TABLE 2 Comparison of I501150 with I649539 I501150 I649539 DIFF P VALUE BARREN % 0.5 11.2 -10.7 0.074+ EHT INCH 40.3 30.3 10.0 0.010+ FINAL 63.9 53.5 10.4 0.000** MST % 17.6 19.5 -1.9 0.129 PHT INCH 82.9 65.1 17.8 0.210 RTL % 1.3 0.2 1.10.000** SHED GDU 1496.3 1588.5 -92.2 0.918 SILK GDU 1502.2 1632.2 -130.0 0.473 STL % 6.9 1.9 5.0 0.020+ YLD BU/A 67.7 50.0 17.7 0.264 Significance Levels are indicated as: + = 10%, * = 5%, ** = 1%. Legend Abbreviations: BARREN % = Barren Plants(percent) EHT INCH = Ear Height (inches) FINAL = Final Stand MST % = Moisture (percent) PHT INCH = Plant Height (inches) RTL % = Root Lodging (percent) SHED GDU = GDUs to Shed SILK GDU = GDUs to Silk STL % = Stalk Lodging (percent) YLD BU/A =Yield(bushels/acre)
A. Origin and Breeding History
Inbred plant I501150 was derived from a 3-way cross made between the lines F307W, 87916W and NL054B (all DEKALB Genetics Corporation proprietary inbreds). The origin and breeding history of inbred plant I501150 can be summarized as follows:
Summer 1995 DeKalb Genetics Corporation Proprietary inbreds; F307W, 87916W and NL054B were crossed at the Mount Olive, NC research station in nursery rows 8515 and 8516. Summer 1996 The Mount Olive population was grown in the Windfall, INnursery and self pollinated in nursery rows 313:19 through 314:43. 15 ears were selected. Winter 1996-97 Two ear bulks from the 1996 summer selected ears were grown and self pollinated. Nursery row 10BB:48. Ear 2 was selected. Summer 1997 Selectedears were grown ear to row and self pollinated. Nursery row 303:47. Ear 1 selected. Summer 1998 Selected ears were grown ear to row and self pollinated. Nursery row 208:35 was selected and designated as coded inbred I501150.
Corn variety I501150 shows uniformity and stability within the limits of environmental influence for the traits described hereinafter in Table 3. I501150 has been self-pollinated and ear-rowed a sufficient number of generations with carefulattention paid to uniformity of plant type to ensure homozygosity and phenotypic stability. No variant traits have been observed or are expected in I501150.
Inbred corn plants can be reproduced by planting the seeds of the inbred corn plant I501150, growing the resulting corn plants under self-pollinating or sib-pollinating conditions with adequate isolation using standard techniques well known to anartisan skilled in the agricultural arts. Seeds can be harvested from such a plant using standard, well known procedures.
B. Phenotypic Description
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a corn plant having the physiological and morphological characteristics of corn plant I501150. A description of selected physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of corn plant I501150 is presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3 Morphological Traits for the I501150 Phenotype CHAR- VALUE ACTERISTIC I501150 I754206 I649539 1. STALK Diameter (width) 2.2 2.5 2.5 cm. Anthocyanin Absent Absent Basel-Weak Brace Root Color Strong Dark Dark Nodes With Brace 2.22.0 1.6 Roots Internode Direction Zig-zag Straight Zig-zag Internode Length 11.0 11.7 12.8 cm. 2. LEAF Color Green Green Green Length cm. 64.0 44.2 24.7 Width cm. 9.3 5.1 3.2 Sheath Anthocyanin Moderate Strong Strong Sheath Pubescence LightHeavy Moderate Marginal Waves Moderate Few Moderate Longitudinal Moderate Few Few Creases 3. TASSEL Length cm. 30.0 34.5 33.4 Spike Length cm. 14.0 16.8 18.7 Peduncle Length 11.0 10.3 7.1 cm. Branch Number 6.8 67 8.1 Anther Color Green-YellowTan Pink Glume Color Mix Green Green Glume Band Present Absent Absent 4. EAR Silk Color Light Red Tan Green-Yellow Number Per Stalk 2.0 1.2 1.0 Position (attitude) Pendant Pendant Pendant Length cm. 12.5 13.4 15.4 Shape Semi-Conical Semi-Semi-Conical Conical Diameter cm. 4.1 4.0 4.0 Weight gm. -- 136.8 136.1 Shank Length cm. 7.0 7.6 8.5 Husk Bract Short Short Short Husk Cover cm. 2.0 5.5 6.0 Husk Opening 8.0 3.2 5.7 Husk Color Fresh Green Green Green Husk Color Dry Buff BuffBuff Cob Diameter cm. 2.2 2.4 2.2 Cob Color White White White Shelling Percent 81.7 82.9 88.4 5. KERNEL Row Number 18.0 16.1 14.5 Number Per Row 26.4 30.2 30.5 Row Direction Straight Slightly Slightly Curved Curved Type Intermediate Semi-DentDent Cap Color Yellow-Orange Yellow White Side Color Yellow-Orange Orange White Length (depth) mm. 11.4 10.4 11.4 Width mm. 7.8 7.2 8.1 Thickness 4.4 4.1 4.1 Weight of 1000K -- 257.3 325.3 gm. Endosperm Type Normal Normal Normal Endosperm ColorWhite Yellow White *These are typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially equivalent are also within the scope of the invention. Substantially equivalent refers to quantitative traits that when compared donot show statistical differences of their means
C. Deposit Information
A representative deposit of 2500 seeds of the inbred corn variety designated I501150 has been made with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Blvd., Manassas, Va. on Jun. 25, 2002. Those deposited seeds have beenassigned ATCC Accession No. PTA-4489. The deposit was made in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Budapest Treaty relating to deposit of microorganisms and was made for a term of at least thirty (30) years and at least five (05) years afterthe most recent request for the furnishing of a sample of the deposit is received by the depository, or for the effective term of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced if it becomes non-viable during that period.
IV. Single Locus Conversions
When the term inbred corn plant is used in the context of the present invention, this also includes any single locus conversions of that inbred. The term single locus converted plant as used herein refers to those corn plants which are developedby a plant breeding technique called backcrossing wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of an inbred are recovered in addition to the single locus transferred into the inbred via the backcrossingtechnique. Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to improve or introduce a characteristic into the inbred. The term backcrossing as used herein refers to the repeated crossing of a hybrid progeny back to one of the parental cornplants for that inbred. The parental corn plant which contributes the locus or loci for the desired characteristic is termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This terminology refers to the fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one time in thebackcross protocol and therefore does not recur. The parental corn plant to which the locus or loci from the nonrecurrent parent are transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in the backcrossing protocol (Poehlman etal., 1995; Fehr, 1987; Sprague and Dudley, 1988). In a typical backcross protocol, the original inbred of interest (recurrent parent) is crossed to a second inbred (nonrecurrent parent) that carries the single locus of interest to be transferred. Theresulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again to the recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a corn plant is obtained wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of the recurrent parent arerecovered in the converted plant, in addition to the single transferred locus from the nonrecurrent parent. The backcross process may be accelerated by the use of genetic markers, such as SSR, RFLP, SNP or AFLP markers to identify plants with thegreatest genetic complement from the recurrent parent.
The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol is to alter or substitute a single trait or characteristic in the original inbred. To accomplish this, asingle locus of the recurrent inbred is modified or substituted with the desired locus from the nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and morphologicalconstitution of the original inbred. The choice of the particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the backcross; one of the major purposes is to add some commercially desirable, agronomically important trait to the plant. The exactbackcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic or trait being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a dominant allele, a recessive allelemay also be transferred. In this instance it may be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic has been successfully transferred.
Many single locus traits have been identified that are not regularly selected for in the development of a new inbred but that can be improved by backcrossing techniques. Single locus traits may or may not be transgenic; examples of these traitsinclude, but are not limited to, male sterility, waxy starch, herbicide resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, male fertility, enhanced nutritional quality, industrial usage, yield stability, and yield,enhancement. These genes are generally inherited through the nucleus, but may be inherited through the cytoplasm. Some known exceptions to this are genes for male sterility, some of which are inherited cytoplasmically, but still act as single locustraits. A number of exemplary single locus traits are described in, for example, PCT Application WO 95/06128, including an ALS gene conferring resistance to sulfonylurea, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference.
Examples of genes conferring male sterility include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,861,709, 3,710,511, 4,654,465, 5,625,132, and 4,727,219, each of the disclosures of which are specifically incorporated herein by reference in theirentirety. A particularly useful type of male sterility gene is one which can be induced by exposure to a chemical agent, for example, a herbicide (U.S. patent Ser. No. 08/927,368, filed Sep. 11, 1997, the disclosure of which is specificallyincorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Both inducible and non-inducible male sterility genes can increase the efficiency with which hybrids are made, in that they eliminate the need to physically emasculate the corn plant used as a female ina given cross.
Where one desires to employ male-sterility systems with a corn plant in accordance with the invention, it may be beneficial to also utilize one or more male-fertility restorer genes. For example, where cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is used,hybrid seed production requires three inbred lines: (1) a cytoplasmically male-sterile line having a CMS cytoplasm; (2) a fertile inbred with normal cytoplasm, which is isogenic with the CMS line for nuclear genes ("maintainer line"); and (3) a distinct,fertile inbred with normal cytoplasm, carrying a fertility restoring gene ("restorer" line). The CMS line is propagated by pollination with the maintainer line, with all of the progeny being male sterile, as the CMS cytoplasm is derived from the femaleparent. These male sterile plants can then be efficiently employed as the female parent in hybrid crosses with the restorer line, without the need for physical emasculation of the male reproductive parts of the female parent.
The presence of a male-fertility restorer gene results in the production of fully fertile F.sub.1 hybrid progeny. If no restorer gene is present in the male parent, male-sterile hybrids are obtained. Such hybrids are useful where the vegetativetissue of the corn plant is utilized, e.g., for silage, but in most cases, the seeds will be deemed the most valuable portion of the crop, so fertility of the hybrids in these crops must be restored. Therefore, one aspect of the current inventionconcerns the inbred corn plant I501150 comprising a single gene capable of restoring male fertility in an otherwise male-sterile inbred or hybrid plant. Examples of male-sterility genes and corresponding restorers which could be employed with the inbredof the invention are well known to those of skill in the art of plant breeding and are disclosed in, for instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,530,191; 5,689,041; 5,741,684; and 5,684,242, the disclosures of which are each specifically incorporated herein byreference in their entirety.
Direct selection may be applied where a single locus acts as a dominant trait. An example of a dominant trait is the herbicide resistance trait. For this selection process, the progeny of the initial cross are sprayed with the herbicide priorto the backcrossing. The spraying eliminates any plants which do not have the desired herbicide resistance characteristic, and only those plants which have the herbicide resistance gene are used in the subsequent backcross. This process is thenrepeated for all additional backcross generations.
Many useful single locus traits are those which are introduced by genetic transformation techniques. Methods for the genetic transformation of maize are known to those of skill in the art. For example, methods which have been described for thegenetic transformation of maize include electroporation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253), electrotransformation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,371,003), microprojectile bombardment (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,318; 5,736,369, 5,538,880; and PCT Publication WO 95/06128),Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616 and E.P. Publication EP672752), direct DNA uptake transformation of protoplasts (Omirulleh et al., 1993) and silicon carbide fiber-mediated transformation (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,302,532 and5,464,765).
A type of single locus trait which can be introduced by genetic transformation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,554,798) and has particular utility is a gene which confers resistance to the herbicide glyphosate. Glyphosate inhibits the action of the enzymeEPSPS, which is active in the biosynthetic pathway of aromatic amino acids. Inhibition of this enzyme leads to starvation for the amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and secondary metabolites derived therefrom. Mutants of this enzymeare available which are resistant to glyphosate. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,535,060 describes the isolation of EPSPS mutations which confer glyphosate resistance upon organisms having the Salmonella typhimurium gene for EPSPS, aroA. A mutant EPSPSgene having similar mutations has also been cloned from Zea mays. The mutant gene encodes a protein with amino acid changes at residues 102 and 106 (PCT Publication WO 97/04103). When a plant comprises such a gene, a herbicide resistant phenotyperesults.
Plants having inherited a transgene comprising a mutated EPSPS gene may, therefore, be directly treated with the herbicide glyphosate without the result of significant damage to the plant. This phenotype provides farmers with the benefit ofcontrolling weed growth in a field of plants having the herbicide resistance trait by application of the broad spectrum herbicide glyphosate. For example, one could apply the herbicide ROUNDUP.TM., a commercial formulation of glyphosate manufactured andsold by the Monsanto Company, over the top in fields where glyphosate resistant corn plants are grown. The herbicide application rates may typically range from 4 ounces of ROUNDUP.TM. to 256 ounces ROUNDUP.TM. per acre. More preferably, about 16ounces to about 64 ounces per acre of ROUNDUP.TM. may be applied to the field. However, the application rate may be increased or decreased as needed, based on the abundance and 1 or type of weeds being treated. Additionally, depending on the locationof the field and weather conditions, which will influence weed growth and the type of weed infestation, it may be desirable to conduct further glyphosate treatments. The second glyphosate application will also typically comprise an application rate ofabout 16 ounces to about 64 ounces of ROUNDUP.TM. per acre treated. Again, the treatment rate may be adjusted based on field conditions. Such methods of application of herbicides to agricultural crops are well known in the art and are summarized ingeneral in Anderson (1983).
Alternatively, more than one single locus trait may be introgressed into an elite inbred by the method of backcross conversion. A selectable marker gene and a gene encoding a protein which confers a trait of interest may be simultaneouslyintroduced into a maize plant as a result of genetic transformation. Usually one or more introduced genes will integrate into a single chromosome site in the host cell's genome. For example, a selectable marker gene encoding phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PPT) (e.g., a bar gene) and conferring resistance to the active ingredient in some herbicides by inhibiting glutamine synthetase, and a gene encoding an endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and conferring resistance to particularclasses of insects, e.g., lepidopteran insects, in particular the European Corn Borer, may be simultaneously introduced into a host genome. Furthermore, through the process of backcross conversion more than one transgenic trait may be transferred intoan elite inbred.
The waxy characteristic is an example of a recessive trait. In this example, the progeny resulting from the first backcross generation (BC1) must be grown and selfed. A test is then run on the selfed seed from the BC1 plant to determine whichBC1 plants carried the recessive gene for the waxy trait. In other recessive traits additional progeny testing, for example growing additional generations such as the BC1S1, may be required to determine which plants carry the recessive gene.
V. Origin and Breeding History of an Exemplary Single Locus Converted Plant
85DGD1 MLms is a single locus conversion of 85DGD1 to cytoplasmic male sterility. 85DGD 1 MLms was derived using backcross methods. 85DGD1 (a proprietary inbred of DEKALB Genetics Corporation) was used as the recurrent parent and MLms, agermplasm source carrying ML cytoplasmic sterility, was used as the nonrecurrent parent. The breeding history of the single locus converted inbred 85DGD1 MLms can be summarized as follows:
Hawaii Nurseries Planting Made up S-O: Female row 585 male Date Apr. 2, 1992 row 500 Hawaii Nurseries Planting S-O was grown and plants were Date July 15, 1992 backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows 444 ' 443) Hawaii Nurseries Planting Bulked seedof the BC1 was grown and Date Nov. 18, 1992 backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows V3- 27 ' V3-26) Hawaii Nurseries Planting Bulked seed of the BC2 was grown and Date Apr. 2, 1993 backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows 37 ' 36) Hawaii Nurseries Planting Bulkedseed of the BC3 was grown and Date July 14, 1993 backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows 99 ' 98) Hawaii Nurseries Planting Bulked seed of BC4 was grown and Date Oct. 28, 1993 backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows KS- 63 ' KS-62) Summer 1994 A single ear of theBC5 was grown and backcrossed times 85DGD1 (MC94-822 ' MC94-822-7) Winter 1994 Bulked seed of the BC6 was grown and backcrossed times 85DGD1 (3Q-1 ' 3Q- 2) Summer 1995 Seed of the BC7 was bulked and named 85DGD1 MLms.
VI. Tissue Cultures and in vitro Regeneration of Corn Plants
A further aspect of the invention relates to tissue cultures of the corn plant designated I501150. As used herein, the term "tissue culture" indicates a composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or a collection ofsuch cells organized into parts of a plant. Exemplary types of tissue cultures are protoplasts, calli and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, leaves, husks, stalks, roots, roottips, anthers, silk, and the like. In a preferred embodiment, the tissue culture comprises embryos, protoplasts, meristematic cells, pollen, leaves or anthers derived from immature tissues of these plant parts. Means for preparing and maintaining planttissue cultures are well known in the art (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,538,880; and 5,550,318, each incorporated herein by reference in their entirety). By way of example, a tissue culture comprising organs such as tassels or anthers has been used to produceregenerated plants (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,445,961 and 5,322,789; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference).
VII. Tassel/Anther Culture
Tassels contain anthers which in turn enclose microspores. Microspores develop into pollen. For anther/microspore culture, if tassels are the plant composition, they are preferably selected at a stage when the microspores are uninucleate, thatis, include only one, rather than 2 or 3 nuclei. Methods to determine the correct stage are well known to those skilled in the art and include mitramycin fluorescent staining (Pace et al., 1987), trypan blue (preferred) and acetocarmine squashing. Themid-uninucleate microspore stage has been found to be the developmental stage most responsive to the subsequent methods disclosed to ultimately produce plants.
Although microspore-containing plant organs such as tassels can generally be pretreated at any cold temperature below about 25.degree. C., a range of 4 to 25.degree. C. is preferred, and a range of 8 to 14.degree. C. is particularly preferred. Although other temperatures yield embryoids and regenerated plants, cold temperatures produce optimum response rates compared to pretreatment at temperatures outside the preferred range. Response rate is measured as either the number of embryoids or thenumber of regenerated plants per number of microspores initiated in culture. Exemplary methods of microspore culture are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,322,789 and 5,445,961, the disclosures of which are specifically incorporated hereinby reference.
Although not required, when tassels are employed as the plant organ, it is generally preferred to sterilize their surface. Following surface sterilization of the tassels, for example, with a solution of calcium hypochloride, the anthers areremoved from about 70 to 150 spikelets (small portions of the tassels) and placed in a preculture or pretreatment medium. Larger or smaller amounts can be used depending on the number of anthers.
When one elects to employ tassels directly, tassels are preferably pretreated at a cold temperature for a predefined time, preferably at 10.degree. C. for about 4 days. After pretreatment of a whole tassel at a cold temperature, dissectedanthers are further pretreated in an environment that diverts microspores from their developmental pathway. The function of the preculture medium is to switch the developmental program from one of pollen development to that of embryoid/callusdevelopment. An embodiment of such an environment in the form of a preculture medium includes a sugar alcohol, for example mannitol or sorbitol, inositol or the like. An exemplary synergistic combination is the use of mannitol at a temperature of about10.degree. C. for a period ranging from about 10 to 14 days. In a preferred embodiment, 3 ml of 0.3 M mannitol combined with 50 mg/l of ascorbic acid, silver nitrate, and colchicine is used for incubation of anthers at 10.degree. C. for between 10 and14 days. Another embodiment is to substitute sorbitol for mannitol. The colchicine produces chromosome doubling at this early stage. The chromosome doubling agent is preferably only present at the preculture stage.
It is believed that the mannitol or other similar carbon structure or environmental stress induces starvation and functions to force microspores to focus their energies on entering developmental stages. The cells are unable to use, for example,mannitol as a carbon source at this stage. It is believed that these treatments confuse the cells causing them to develop as embryoids and plants from microspores. Dramatic increases in development from these haploid cells, as high as 25 embryoids in10.sup.4 microspores, have resulted from using these methods.
In embodiments where microspores are obtained from anthers, microspores can be released from the anthers into an isolation medium following the mannitol preculture step. One method of release is by disruption of the anthers, for example, bychopping the anthers into pieces with a sharp instrument, such as a razor blade, scalpel, or Waring blender. The resulting mixture of released microspores, anther fragments, and isolation medium are then passed through a filter separate microspores fromanther wall fragments. An embodiment of a filter is a mesh, more specifically, a nylon mesh of about 112 mm pore size. The filtrate which results from filtering the microspore-containing solution is preferably relatively free of anther fragments, cellwalls, and other debris.
In a preferred embodiment, isolation of microspores is accomplished at a temperature below about 25.degree. C. and preferably, at a temperature of less than about 15.degree. C. Preferably, the isolation media, dispersing tool (e.g., razorblade), funnels, centrifuge tubes, and dispersing container (e.g., petri dish) are all maintained at the reduced temperature during isolation. The use of a precooled dispersing tool to isolate maize microspores has been reported (Gaillard et al., 1991).
Where appropriate and desired, the anther filtrate is then washed several times in isolation medium. The purpose of the washing and centrifugation is to eliminate any toxic compounds which are contained in the non-microspore part of the filtrateand are created by the chopping process. The centrifugation is usually done at decreasing spin speeds, for example, 1000, 750, and finally 500 rpms. The result of the foregoing steps is the preparation of a relatively pure tissue culture suspension ofmicrospores that are relatively free of debris and anther remnants.
To isolate microspores, an isolation media is preferred. An isolation media is used to as separate microspores from the anther walls while maintaining their viability and embryogenic potential. An illustrative embodiment of an isolation mediaincludes a 6% sucrose or maltose solution combined with an antioxidant such as 50 mg/l of ascorbic acid, 0.1 mg/l biotin, and 400 mg/l of proline, combined with 10 mg/l of nicotinic acid and 0.5 mg/l AgNO.sub.3. In another embodiment, the biotin andproline are omitted.
An isolation media preferably has a higher antioxidant level where it is used to isolate microspores from a donor plant (a plant from which a plant composition containing a microspore is obtained) that is field grown in contrast to greenhousegrown. A preferred level of ascorbic acid in an isolation medium is from about 50 mg/l to about 125 mg/l and, more preferably, from about 50 mg/l to about 100 mg/l.
One can find particular benefit in employing a support for the microspores during culturing and subculturing. Any support that maintains the cells near the surface can be used. The microspore suspension is layered onto a support, for example bypipetting. There are several types of supports which are suitable and are within the scope of the invention. An illustrative embodiment of a solid support is a TRANSWELL.RTM. culture dish. Another embodiment of a solid support for development of themicrospores is a bilayer plate wherein liquid media is on top of a solid base. Other embodiments include a mesh or a millipore filter. Preferably, a solid support is a nylon mesh in the shape of a raft. A raft is defined as an approximately circularsupport material which is capable of floating slightly above the bottom of a tissue culture vessel, for example, a petri dish, of about a 60 or 100 mm size, although any other laboratory tissue culture vessel will suffice. In an illustrative embodiment,a raft is about 55 mm in diameter.
Culturing isolated microspores on a solid support, for example, on a 10 mm pore nylon raft floating on 2.2 ml of medium in a 60 mm petri dish, prevents microspores from sinking into the liquid medium and thus avoiding low oxygen tension. Thesetypes of cell supports enable the serial transfer of the nylon raft with its associated microspore/embryoids ultimately to full strength medium containing activated charcoal and solidified with, for example, GELRITE.TM. (solidifying agent). Thecharcoal is believed to absorb toxic wastes and intermediaries. The solid medium allows embryoids to mature.
The liquid medium passes through the mesh while the microspores are retained and supported at the medium-air interface. The surface tension of the liquid medium in the petri dish causes the raft to float. The liquid is able to pass through themesh; consequently, the microspores stay on top. The mesh remains on top of the total volume of liquid medium. An advantage of the raft is to permit diffusion of nutrients to the microspores. Use of a raft also permits transfer of the microspores fromdish to dish during subsequent subculture with minimal loss, disruption, or disturbance of the induced embryoids that are developing. The rafts represent an advantage over the multi-welled TRANSWELL.RTM. plates, which are commercially available fromCOSTAR, in that the commercial plates are expensive. Another disadvantage of these plates is that to achieve the serial transfer of microspores to subsequent media, the membrane support with cells must be peeled off the insert in the wells. Thisprocedure does not produce as good a yield nor as efficient transfers, as when a mesh is used as a vehicle for cell transfer.
The culture vessels can be further defined as either (1) a bilayer 60 mm petri plate wherein the bottom 2 ml of medium are solidified with 0.7% agarose overlaid with 1 mm of liquid containing the microspores; (2) a nylon mesh raft wherein a waferof nylon is floated on 1.2 ml of medium and 1 ml of isolated microspores is pipetted on top; or (3) TRANSWELL.RTM. plates wherein isolated microspores are pipetted onto membrane inserts which support the microspores at the surface of 2 ml of medium.
After the microspores have been isolated, they are cultured in a low strength anther culture medium until about the 50 cell stage when they are subcultured onto an embryoid/callus maturation medium. Medium is defined at this stage as anycombination of nutrients that permit the microspores to develop into embryoids or callus. Many examples of suitable embryoid/callus promoting media are well known to those skilled in the art. These media will typically comprise mineral salts, a carbonsource, vitamins, and growth regulators. A solidifying agent is optional. A is preferred embodiment of such a media is referred to as "D medium," which typically includes 6N1 salts, AgNO.sub.3 and sucrose or maltose.
In an illustrative embodiment, 1 ml of isolated microspores are pipetted onto a 10 mm nylon raft and the raft is floated on 1.2 ml of medium "D," containing sucrose or preferably maltose. Both calli and embryoids can develop. Calli areundifferentiated aggregates of cells. Type I is a relatively compact, organized, and slow growing callus. Type II is a soft, friable, and fast-growing one. Embryoids are aggregates exhibiting some embryo-like structures. The embryoids are preferredfor subsequent steps to regenerating plants. Culture medium "D" is an embodiment of medium that follows the isolation medium and replaces it. Medium "D" promotes growth to an embryoid/callus. This medium comprises 6N1 salts at 1/8 the strength of abasic stock solution (major components) and minor components, plus 12% sucrose, or preferably 12% maltose, 0.1 mg/l B1, 0.5 mg/l nicotinic acid, 400 mg/l proline and 0.5 mg/l silver nitrate. Silver nitrate is believed to act as an inhibitor to theaction of ethylene. Multi-cellular structures of approximately 50 cells each generally arise during a period of 12 days to 3 weeks. Serial transfer after a two week incubation period is preferred.
After the petri dish has been incubated for an appropriate period of time, preferably two weeks in the dark at a predefined temperature, a raft bearing the dividing microspores is transferred serially to solid based media which promote embryomaturation. In an illustrative embodiment, the incubation temperature is 30.degree. C. and the mesh raft supporting the embryoids is transferred to a 100 mm petri dish containing the 6N1-TGR-4P medium, an "anther culture medium." This medium contains6N1 salts, supplemented with 0.1 mg/l TIBA, 12% sugar (sucrose, maltose, or a combination thereof), 0.5% activated charcoal, 400 mg/l proline, 0.5 mg/l B, 0.5 mg/l nicotinic acid, and 0.2 percent GELRITE.TM. (solidifying agent) and is capable ofpromoting the maturation of the embryoids. Higher quality embryoids, that is, embryoids which exhibit more organized development, such as better shoot meristem formation without precocious germination, were typically obtained with the transfer to fullstrength medium compared to those resulting from continuous culture using only, for example, the isolated microspore culture (IMC) Medium "D." The maturation process permits the pollen embryoids to develop further in route toward the eventualregeneration of plants. Serial transfer occurs to full strength solidified 6N1 medium using either the nylon raft, the TRANSWELL.TM. membrane, or bilayer plates, each one requiring the movement of developing embryoids to permit further development intophysiologically more mature structures. In an especially preferred embodiment, microspores are isolated in an isolation media comprising about 6% maltose, cultured for about two weeks in an embryoid/calli induction medium comprising about 12% maltoseand then transferred to a solid medium comprising about 12% sucrose.
At the point of transfer of the raft, after about two weeks of incubation, embryoids exist on a nylon support. The purpose of transferring the raft with the embryoids to a solidified medium after the incubation is to facilitate embryomaturation. Mature embryoids at this point are selected by visual inspection indicated by zygotic embryo-like dimensions and structures and are transferred to the shoot initiation medium. It is preferred that shoots develop before roots, or that shootsand roots develop concurrently. If roots develop before shoots, plant regeneration can be impaired. To produce solidified media, the bottom of a petri dish of approximately 100 mm is covered with about 30 ml of 0.2% GELRITE.TM. solidified medium. Asequence of regeneration media are used for whole plant formation from the embryoids.
During the regeneration process, individual embryoids are induced to form plantlets. The number of different media in the sequence can vary depending on the specific protocol used. Finally, a rooting medium is used as a prelude to transplantingto soil. When plantlets reach a height of about 5 cm, they are then transferred to pots for further growth into flowering plants in a greenhouse by methods well known to those skilled in the art.
Plants have been produced from isolated microspore cultures by the methods disclosed herein, including self-pollinated plants. The rate of embryoid induction was much higher with the synergistic preculture treatment consisting of a combinationof stress factors, including a carbon source which can be capable of inducing starvation, a cold temperature, and colchicine, than has previously been reported. An illustrative embodiment of the synergistic combination of treatments leading to thedramatically improved response rate compared to prior methods, is a temperature of about 10.degree. C., mannitol as a carbon source, and 0.05% colchicine.
The inclusion of ascorbic acid, an anti-oxidant, in the isolation medium is preferred for maintaining good microspore viability. However, there seems to be no advantage to including mineral salts in the isolation medium. The osmotic potentialof the isolation medium was maintained optimally with about 6% sucrose, although a range of 2% to 12% is within the scope of this invention.
In an embodiment of the embryoid/callus organizing media, mineral salts concentration in IMC Culture Media "D" is (1/8.times.), the concentration which is used also in anther culture medium. The 6N1 salts major components have been modified toremove ammonium nitrogen. Osmotic potential in the culture medium is maintained with about 12% sucrose and about 400 mg/l proline. Silver nitrate (0.5 mg/l) was included in the medium to modify ethylene activity. The preculture media is furthercharacterized by having a pH of about 5.7 to 6.0. Silver nitrate and vitamins do not appear to be crucial to this medium but do improve the efficiency of the response.
Whole anther cultures can also be used in the production of monocotyledonous plants from a plant culture system. There are some basic similarities of anther culture methods and microspore culture methods with regard to the media used. Adifference from isolated microspore cultures is that undisrupted anthers are cultured, so that a support, e.g., a nylon mesh support, is not needed. The first step in developing the anther cultures is to incubate tassels at a cold temperature. A coldtemperature is defined as less than about 25.degree. C. More specifically, the incubation of the tassels is preferably performed at about 10.degree. C. A range of 8 to 14.degree. C. is also within the scope of the invention. The anthers are thendissected from the tassels, preferably after surface sterilization using forceps, and placed on solidified medium. An example of such a medium is designated 6N1-TGR-P4.
The anthers are then treated with environmental conditions that are combinations of stresses that are capable of diverting microspores from gametogenesis to embryogenesis. It is believed that the stress effect of sugar alcohols in the preculturemedium, for example, mannitol, is produced by inducing starvation at the predefined temperature. In one embodiment, the incubation pretreatment is for about 14 days at 10.degree. C. It was found that treating the anthers in addition with a carbonstructure, an illustrative embodiment being a sugar alcohol, preferably mannitol, produces dramatically higher anther culture response rates as measured by the number of eventually regenerated plants, than by treatment with either cold treatment ormannitol alone. These results are particularly surprising in light of teachings that cold is better than mannitol for these purposes, and that warmer temperatures interact with mannitol better.
To incubate the anthers, they are floated on a preculture medium which diverts the microspores from gametogenesis, preferably on a mannitol carbon structure, more specifically, 0.3 M of mannitol plus 50 mg/l of ascorbic acid. Three millilitersis about the total amount in a dish, for example, a tissue culture dish, more specifically, a 60 mm petri dish. Anthers are isolated from about 120 spikelets for one dish yields about 360 anthers.
Chromosome doubling agents can be used in the preculture media for anther cultures. Several techniques for doubling chromosome number (Jensen, 1974; Wan et al., 1989) have been described. Colchicine is one of the doubling agents. However,developmental abnormalities arising from in vitro cloning are further enhanced by colchicine treatments, and previous reports indicated that colchicine is toxic to microspores. The addition of colchicine in increasing concentrations during mannitolpretreatment prior to anther culture and microspore culture has achieved improved percentages.
An illustrative embodiment of the combination of a chromosome doubling agent and preculture medium is one which contains colchicine. In a specific embodiment, the colchicine level is preferably about 0.05%. The anthers remain in the mannitolpreculture medium with the additives for about 10 days at 10.degree. C. Anthers are then placed on maturation media, for example, that designated 6N1-TGR-P4, for 3 to 6 weeks to induce embryoids. If the plants are to be regenerated from the embryoids,shoot regeneration medium is employed, as in the isolated microspore procedure described in the previous sections. Other regeneration media can be used sequentially to complete regeneration of whole plants.
The anthers are then exposed to embryoid/callus promoting medium, for example, that designated 6N1-TGR-P4, to obtain callus or embryoids. The embryoids are recognized visually by identification of embryonic-like structures. At this stage, theembryoids are transferred progressively through a series of regeneration media. In an illustrative embodiment, the shoot initiation medium comprises BAP (6-benzyl-amino-purine) and NAA (naphthalene acetic acid). Regeneration protocols for isolatedmicrospore cultures and anther cultures are similar.
VIII. Additional Tissue Cultures and Regeneration
The present invention contemplates a corn plant regenerated from a tissue culture of the inbred maize plant I501150, or of a hybrid maize plant produced by crossing I501150. As is well known in the art, tissue culture of corn can be used for thein vitro regeneration of a corn plant. By way of example, a process of tissue culturing and regeneration of corn is described in European Patent Application 0 160 390, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Corn tissue cultureprocedures are also described in Green and Rhodes (1982) and Duncan et al. (1985). The study by Duncan et al. (1985) indicates that 97 percent of cultured plants produced calli capable of regenerating plants. Subsequent studies have shown that bothinbreds and hybrids produced 91% regenerable calli that produced plants.
Other studies indicate that non-traditional tissues are capable of producing somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration (Songstad et al., 1988; Rao et al., 1986; Conger et al., 1987; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein byreference). Regenerable cultures, including Type I and Type II cultures, may be initiated from immature embryos using methods described in, for example, PCT Application WO 95/06128, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety.
Briefly, by way of example, to regenerate a plant of this invention, cells are selected following growth in culture. Where employed, cultured cells are preferably grown either on solid supports or in the form of liquid suspensions as set forthabove. In either instance, nutrients are provided to the cells in the form of media, and environmental conditions are controlled. There are many types of tissue culture media comprising amino acids, salts, sugars, hormones, and vitamins. Most of themedia employed to regenerate inbred and hybrid plants have some similar components; the media differ in the composition and proportions of their ingredients depending on the particular application envisioned. For example, various cell types usually growin more than one type of media, but exhibit different growth rates and different morphologies, depending on the growth media. In some media, cells survive but do not divide. Various types of media suitable for culture of plant cells have beenpreviously described and discussed above.
An exemplary embodiment for culturing recipient corn cells in suspension cultures includes using embryogenic cells in Type II (Armstrong and Green, 1985; Gordon-Kamm et al., 1990) callus, selecting for small (10 to 30 mm) isodiametric,cytoplasmically dense cells, growing the cells in suspension cultures with hormone containing media, subculturing into a progression of media to facilitate development of shoots and roots, and finally, hardening the plant and readying it metabolicallyfor growth in soil.
Meristematic cells (i.e., plant cells capable of continual cell division and characterized by an undifferentiated cytological appearance, normally found at growing points or tissues in plants such as root tips, stem apices, lateral buds, etc.)can be cultured (U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,369, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference).
Embryogenic calli are produced essentially as described in PCT Application WO 95/06128. Specifically, inbred plants or plants from hybrids produced from crossing an inbred of the present invention with another inbred are grown to flowering in agreenhouse. Explants from at least one of the following F.sub.1 tissues: the immature tassel tissue, intercalary meristems and leaf bases, apical meristems, immature ears and immature embryos are placed in an initiation medium which contain MS salts,supplemented with thiamine, agar, and sucrose. Cultures are incubated in the dark at about 23.degree. C. All culture manipulations and selections are performed with the aid of a dissecting microscope.
After about 5 to 7 days, cellular outgrowths are observed from the surface of the explants. After about 7 to 21 days, the outgrowths are subcultured by placing them into fresh medium of the same composition. Some of the intact immature embryoexplants are placed on fresh medium. Several subcultures later (after about 2 to 3 months) enough material is present from explants for subdivision of these embryogenic calli into two or more pieces.
Callus pieces from different explants are not mixed. After further growth and subculture (about 6 months after embryogenic callus initiation), there are usually between 1 and 100 pieces derived ultimately from each selected explant. During thistime of culture expansion, a characteristic embryogenic culture morphology develops as a result of careful selection at each subculture. Any organized structures resembling roots or root primordia are discarded. Material known from experience to lackthe capacity for sustained growth is also discarded (translucent, watery, embryogenic structures). Structures with a firm consistency resembling at least in part the scutelum of the in vivo embryo are selected.
The callus is maintained on agar-solidified MS or N6-type media. A preferred hormone is 2,4-D. A second preferred hormone is dicamba. Visual selection of embryo-like structures is done to obtain subcultures. Transfer of material other thanthat displaying embryogenic morphology results in loss of the ability to recover whole plants from the callus.
Cell suspensions are prepared from the calli by selecting cell populations that appear homogeneous macroscopically. A portion of the friable, rapidly growing embryogenic calli is inoculated into MS or N6 Medium containing 2,4-D or dicamba. Thecalli in medium are incubated at about 27.degree. C. on a gyrotary shaker in the dark or in the presence of low light. The resultant suspension culture is transferred about once every three to seven days, preferably every three to four days, by takingabout 5 to 10 ml of the culture and introducing this inoculum into fresh medium of the composition listed above (PCT Application WO 95/06128).
For regeneration of type I or type II callus, callus is transferred to a solidified culture medium which includes a lower concentration of 2,4-D or other auxins than is present in culture medium used for callus maintenance (PCT Application WO95/06128, specifically incorporated herein by reference). Other hormones which can be used in regeneration media include dicamba, NAA, ABA, BAP, and 2-NCA. Regeneration of plants is completed by the transfer of mature and germinating embryos to ahormone-free medium, followed by the transfer of developed plantlets to soil and growth to maturity. Plant regeneration is described in PCT Application WO 95/06128.
Cells from the meristem or cells fated to contribute to the meristem of a cereal plant embryo at the early proembryo, mid proembryo, late proembryo, transitional or early coleoptilar stage may be cultured so as to produce a proliferation ofshoots or multiple meristems from which fertile plants may be regenerated. Alternatively, cells from the meristem or cells fated to contribute to the meristem of a cereal plant immature ear or tassel may be cultured so as to produce a proliferation ofshoots or multiple meristems from which fertile plants may be regenerated (U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,369).
Progeny of any generation are produced by taking pollen and selfing, backcrossing, or sibling crossing regenerated plants by methods well known to those skilled in the arts. Seeds are collected from the regenerated plants. Alternatively,progeny of any generation may be produced by pollinating a regenerated plant with its own pollen or pollen of a second maize plant. Using the methods described herein, tissue cultures and immature or mature plant tissues may be used as recipient cellcultures for the process of genetic transformation.
IX. Processes of Preparing Corn Plants and the Corn Plants Produced by such Crosses
The present invention also provides a process of preparing a novel corn plant and a corn plant produced by such a process. In accordance with such a process, a first parent corn plant is crossed with a second parent corn plant wherein at leastone of the first and second corn plants is the inbred corn plant I501150. An important aspect of this process is that it can be used for the development of novel inbred lines. For example, the inbred corn plant I501150 could be crossed to any secondplant, and the resulting hybrid progeny each selfed for about 5 to 7 or more generations, thereby providing a large number of distinct, pure-breeding inbred lines. These inbred lines could then be crossed with other inbred or non-inbred lines and theresulting hybrid progeny analyzed for beneficial characteristics. In this way, novel inbred lines conferring desirable characteristics could be identified.
In selecting a second plant to cross with I501150 for the purpose of developing novel inbred lines, it will typically be desired choose those plants which either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or which exhibitthe desired characteristic(s) when in hybrid combination. Examples of potentially desired characteristics include greater yield, better stalks, better roots, resistance to insecticides, herbicides, pests, and disease, tolerance to heat and drought,reduced time to crop maturity, better agronomic quality, higher nutritional value, and uniformity in germination times, stand establishment, growth rate, maturity, and fruit size. Alternatively, the inbred variety I501150 may be crossed with a second,different inbred plant for the purpose of producing hybrid seed which is sold to farmers for planting in commercial production fields. In this case, a second inbred variety is selected which confers desirable characteristics when in hybrid combinationwith the first inbred line.
Corn plants (Zea mays L.) can be crossed by either natural or mechanical techniques. Natural polination occurs in corn when wind blows pollen from the tassels to the silks that protrude from the tops of the recipient ears. Mechanicalpollination can be effected either by controlling the types of pollen that can blow onto the silks or by pollinating by hand.
In a preferred embodiment, crossing comprises the steps of:
(a) planting in pollinating proximity seeds of a first and a second parent corn plant, and preferably, seeds of a first inbred corn plant and a second, distinct inbred corn plant;
(b) cultivating or growing the seeds of the first and second parent corn plants into plants that bear flowers;
(c) emasculating flowers of either the first or second parent corn plant, i.e., treating the flowers so as to prevent pollen production, or alternatively, using as the female parent a male sterile plant, thereby providing an emasculated parentcorn plant;
(d) allowing natural cross-pollination to occur between the first and second parent corn plants;
(e) harvesting seeds produced on the emasculated parent corn plant; and, where desired,
(f) growing the harvested seed into a corn plant, preferably, a hybrid corn plant.
Parental plants are typically planted in pollinating proximity to each other by planting the parental plants in alternating rows, in blocks or in any other convenient planting pattern. Where the parental plants differ in timing of sexualmaturity, it may be desired to plant the slower maturing plant first, thereby ensuring the availability of pollen from the male parent during the time at which silks on the female parent are receptive to pollen. Plants of both parental parents arecultivated and allowed to grow until the time of flowering. Advantageously, during this growth stage, plants are in general treated with fertilizer and/or other agricultural chemicals as considered appropriate by the grower.
At the time of flowering, in the event that plant I501150 is employed as the male parent, the tassels of the other parental plant are removed from all plants employed as the female parental plant to avoid self-pollination. The detasseling can beachieved manually but also can be done by machine, if desired. Alternatively, when the female parent corn plant comprises a cytoplasmic or nuclear gene conferring male sterility, detasseling may not be required. Additionally, a chemical gametocide maybe used to sterilize the male flowers of the female plant. In this case, the parent plants used as the male may either not be treated with the chemical agent or may comprise a genetic factor which causes resistance to the emasculating effects of thechemical agent. Gametocides affect processes or cells involved in the development, maturation or release of pollen. Plants treated with such gametocides are rendered male sterile, but typically remain female fertile The use of chemical gametocides isdescribed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,904, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Furthermore, the use of Roundup herbicide in combination with glyphosate tolerant maize plants to producemale sterile corn plants is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/927,368 and PCT Publication WO 98/44140.
Following emnasculation, the plants are then typically allowed to continue to grow and natural cross-pollination occurs as a result of the action of wind, which is normal in the pollination of grasses, including corn. As a result of theemasculation of the female parent plant, au the pollen from the male parent plant is available for pollination because tassels, and thereby pollen bearing flowering parts, have been previously removed from all plants of the inbred plant being used as thefemale in the hybridization. Of course, during this hybridization procedure, the parental varieties are grown such that they are isolated from other corn fields to minimize or prevent any accidental contamination of pollen from foreign sources. Theseisolation techniques are well within the skill of those skilled in this art.
Both parental inbred plants of corn may be allowed to continue to grow until maturity or the male rows may be destroyed after flowering is complete. Only the ears from the female inbred parental plants are harvested to obtain seeds of a novelF.sub.1 hybrid. The novel F.sub.1 hybrid seed produced can then be planted in a subsequent growing season in commercial fields or, alternatively, advanced in breeding protocols for purposes of developing novel inbred lines.
Alternatively, in another embodiment of the invention, both first and second parent corn plants can come from the same inbred corn plant, i.e., from the inbred designated I501150. Thus, any corn plant produced using a process of the presentinvention and inbred corn plant I501150, is contemplated by the current inventor. As used herein, crossing can mean selfing, backcrossing, crossing to another or the same inbred, crossing to populations, and the like. All corn plants produced using theinbred corn plant I501150 as a parent are, therefore, within the scope of this invention.
The utility of the inbred plant I501150 also extends to crosses with other species. Commonly, suitable species will be of the family Graminaceae, and especially of the genera Zea, Tripsacum, Coix, Schlerachne, Polytoca, Chionachne, andTrilobachne, of the tribe Maydeae. Of these, Zea and Tripsacum, are most preferred. Potentially suitable for crosses with I501150 can also be the various varieties of grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.
A. F.sub.1 Hybrid Corn Plant and Seed Production
Any time the inbred corn plant I501150 is crossed with another, different, corn inbred, a first generation (F.sub.1) corn hybrid plant is produced. As such, an F.sub.1 hybrid corn plant may be produced by crossing I501150 with any second inbredmaize plant. Therefore, any F.sub.1 hybrid corn plant or corn seed which is produced with I501150 as a parent is part of the present invention. The goal of the process of producing an F.sub.1 hybrid is to manipulate the genetic complement of corn togenerate new combinations of genes which interact to yield new or improved traits (phenotypic characteristics). A process of producing an F.sub.1 hybrid typically begins with the production of one or more inbred plants. Those plants are produced byrepeated crossing of ancestrally related corn plants to try to combine certain genes within the inbred plants.
Corn has a diploid phase which means two conditions of a gene (two alleles) occupy each locus (position on a chromosome). If the alleles are the same at a locus, there is said to be homozygosity. If they are different, there is said to beheterozygosity. In a completely inbred plant, all loci are homozygous. Because many loci when homozygous are deleterious to the plant, in particular leading to reduced vigor, less kernels, weak and/or poor growth, production of inbred plants is anunpredictable and arduous process. Under some conditions, heterozygous advantage at some loci effectively bars perpetuation of homozygosity.
Inbreeding requires sophisticated manipulation by human breeders. Even in the extremely unlikely event inbreeding rather than crossbreeding occurred in natural corn, achievement of complete inbreeding cannot be expected in nature due to wellknown deleterious effects of homozygosity and the large number of generations the plant would have to breed in isolation. The reason for the breeder to create inbred plants is to have a known reservoir of genes whose gametic transmission is predictable.
The development of inbred plants generally requires at least about 5 to 7 generations of selfing. Inbred plants are then cross-bred in an attempt to develop improved F.sub.1 hybrids. Hybrids are then screened and evaluated in small scale fieldtrials. Typically, about 10 to 15 phenotypic traits, selected for their potential commercial value, are measured. A selection index of the most commercially important traits is used to help evaluate hybrids. FACT, an acronym for Field AnalysisComparison Trial (strip trials), is an on-farm experimental testing program employed by DEKALB Genetics Corporation to perform the final evaluation of the commercial potential of a product.
During the next several years, a progressive elimination of hybrids occurs based on more detailed evaluation of their phenotype. Eventually, strip trials (FACT) are conducted to formally compare the experimental hybrids being developed withother hybrids, some of which were previously developed and generally are commercially successful. That is, comparisons of experimental hybrids are made to competitive hybrids to determine if there was any advantage to further development of theexperimental hybrids. Examples of such comparisons are presented hereinbelow. After FACT testing is complete, determinations may be made whether commercial development should proceed for a given hybrid.
When the inbred corn plant I501150 is crossed with another inbred plant to yield a hybrid, the original inbred can serve as either the maternal or paternal plant. For many crosses, the outcome is the same regardless of the assigned sex of theparental plants.
However, there is often one of the parental plants that is preferred as the maternal plant because of increased seed yield and production characteristics. Some plants produce tighter ear husks leading to more loss, for example due to rot. Therecan be delays in silk formation which deleteriously affect timing of the reproductive cycle for a pair of parental inbreds. Seed coat characteristics can be preferable in one plant. Pollen can be shed better by one plant. Other variables can alsoaffect preferred sexual assignment of a particular cross.
B. F.sub.1 Hybrid Comparisons
As mentioned above, hybrids are progressively eliminated following detailed evaluations of their phenotype, including formal comparisons with other commercially successful hybrids. Strip trials are used to compare the phenotypes of hybrids grownin as many environments as possible. They are performed in many environments to assess overall performance of the new hybrids and to select optimum growing conditions. Because the corn is grown in close proximity, environmental factors that affect geneexpression, such as moisture, temperature, sunlight, and pests, are minimized. For a decision to be made to commercialize a hybrid, it is not necessary that the hybrid be better than all other hybrids. Rather, significant improvements must be shown inat least some traits that would create improvements in some niches.
C. Physical Description of F.sub.1 Hybrids
The present invention provides F.sub.1 hybrid corn plants derived from the corn plant I501150. The physical characteristics of one such hybrid corn plant made using the current inbred variety as a parent are set forth in Table 4. An explanationof terms used in Table 4 can be found in the Definitions, set forth hereinabove.
TABLE 4 Morphological Traits for the Hybrid 9903904 Phenotype CHARACTERISTIC VALUE 1. STALK Diameter (width) cm. 2.3 Anthocyanin Basel-Weak Nodes With Brace Roots 1.6 Brace Root Color Faint Internode Direction Zig-zag Internode Lengthcm 14.8 2. LEAF Color Dark Green Length cm. 95.1 Width cm. 9.2 Sheath Anthocyanin Weak Sheath Pubescence Moderate Marginal Waves Few Longitudinal Creases Many 3. TASSEL Attitude Slightly Curved Length cm. 46.3 Spike Length cm. 24.1 PeduncleLength cm. 12.8 Branch Number 7.6 Anther Color Salmon Glume Color Red Glume Band Absent 4. EAR Silk Color Yellow Number Per Stalk 1.0 Position (attitude) Upright Length cm. 18.2 Shape Semi-Conical Diameter cm. 4.7 Shank Length cm. 10.8 HuskBract Short Husk Cover cm. 3.2 Husk Opening 8.0 Husk Color Fresh Green Husk Color Dry Buff Cob Diameter cm. 2.5 Cob Color White Shelling Percent 85.7 5. KERNEL Row Number 15.2 Number Per Row 38.6 Row Direction Straight Type Dent Cap ColorWhite Side Color White Length (depth) mm. 12.6 Width mm. 8.2 Thickness 3.2 Endosperm Type Normal Endosperm Color White *These are typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially equivalent are also withinthe scope of the invention. Substantially equivalent refers to quantitative traits that when compared do not show statistical differences of their means.
X. Genetic Complements
The present invention provides a genetic complement of the inbred corn plant variety designated I501150. Further provided by the invention is a hybrid genetic complement, wherein the complement is formed by the combination of a haploid geneticcomplement from I501150 and another haploid genetic complement. Means for determining such a genetic complement are well-known in the art.
As used herein, the phrase "genetic complement" means an aggregate of nucleotide sequences, the expression of which defines the phenotype of a corn plant or a cell or tissue of that plant. By way of example, a corn plant is genotyped todetermine a representative sample of the inherited markers it possesses. Markers are alleles at a single locus. They are preferably inherited in codominant fashion so that the presence of both alleles at a diploid locus is readily detectable, and theyare free of environmental variation, i.e., their heritability is 1. This genotyping is preferably performed on at least one generation of the descendant plant for which the numerical value of the quantitative trait or traits of interest are alsodetermined. The array of single locus genotypes is expressed as a profile of marker alleles, two at each locus. The marker allelic composition of each locus can be either homozygous or heterozygous. Homozygosity is a condition where both alleles at alocus are characterized by the same nucleotide sequence or size of a repeated sequence. Heterozygosity refers to different conditions of the gene at a locus. A preferred type of genetic marker for use with the invention is simple sequence repeats(SSRs), although potentially any other type of genetic marker could be used, for example, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and isozymes.
A genetic marker profile of an inbred may be predictive of the agronomic traits of a hybrid produced using that inbred. For example, if an inbred of known genetic marker profile and phenotype is crossed with a second inbred of known geneticmarker profile and phenotype it is possible to predict the phenotype of the F.sub.1 hybrid based on the combined genetic marker profiles of the parent inbreds. Methods for prediction of hybrid performance from genetic marker data is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,547, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Such predictions may be made using any suitable genetic marker, for example, SSRS, RFLPs, AFLPs, SNPs, or isozymes.
SSRs are genetic markers based on polymorphisms in repeated nucleotide sequences, such as microsatellites. A marker system based on SSRs can be highly informative in linkage analysis relative to other marker systems in that multiple alleles maybe present. Another advantage of this type of marker is that, through use of flanking primers, detection of SSRs can be achieved, for example, by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR.TM.), thereby eliminating the need for labor-intensive Southernhybridization. The PCR.TM. detection is done by use of two oligonucleotide primers flanking the polymorphic segment of repetitive DNA. Repeated cycles of heat denaturation of the DNA followed by annealing of the primers to their complementarysequences at low temperatures, and extension of the annealed primers with DNA polymerase, comprise the major part of the methodology. Following amplification, markers can be scored by gel electrophoresis of the amplification products. Scoring of markergenotype is based on the size (number of base pairs) of the amplified segment.
Means for performing genetic analyses using SSR polymorphisms are well known in the art. The SSR analyses reported herein were conducted by Celera AgGen in Davis, Calif. This service is available to the public on a contractual basis. Thisanalysis was carried out by amplification of simple repeats followed by detection of marker genotypes using gel electrophoresis. Markers were scored based on the size of the amplified fragment.
The SSR genetic marker profile of the parental inbreds and exemplary resultant hybrid described herein were determined. Because an inbred is essentially homozygous at all relevant loci, an inbred should, in almost all cases, have only one alleleat each locus. In contrast, a diploid genetic marker profile of a hybrid should be the sum of those parents, e.g., if one inbred parent had the allele 168 (base pairs) at a particular locus, and the other inbred parent had 172, the hybrid is 168,172 byinference. Subsequent generations of progeny produced by selection and breeding are expected to be of genotype 168, 172, or 168,172 for that locus position. When the F.sub.1 plant is used to produce an inbred, the locus should be either 168 or 172 forthat position. Surprisingly, it has been observed that in certain instances, novel SSR genotypes arise during the breeding process. For example, a genotype of 170 may be observed at a particular locus position from the cross of parental inbreds with168 and 172 at that locus. Such a novel SSR genotype may further define an inbred variety from the parental inbreds from which it was derived. An SSR genetic marker profile of I501150 is presented in Table 5.
TABLE 5 SSR Profile of I501150 and Comparative Corn Varieties LOCUS I501150 I754206 I649539 BNGL105 94 94 92 BNGL118 110 110 110 BNGL149 187 187 187 BNGL244 192 -- -- BNGL426 119 119 119 BNGL589 175 175 175 BNGL615 227 231 227 BNGL619234 265 234 DUP14 112 112 112 DUP28 123 123 137 MC1014 169 169 169 MC1017 196 196 176 MC1018 130 130 164 MC1022 67 67 127 MC1028 159 159 161 MC1043 175 -- 187 MC1046 218 218 196 MC1065 230 230 243 MC1070 250 239 239 MC1074 186 186 174 MC1079177 184 173 MC1094 184 184 200 MC1108 144 144 144 MC1129 208 204 200 MC1131 115 109 111 MC1138 186 186 200 MC1176 220 220 218 MC1182 106 106 84 MC1189 219 219 225 MC1191 238 206 239 MC1194 177 177 -- MC1208 111 111 111 MC1209 184 184 184 MC1237 159 161 159 MC1265 246 246 220 MC1287 160 160 158 MC1288 113 120 -- MC1302 147 147 147 MC1305 196 206 198 MC1325 179 175 185 MC1329 93 93 93 MC1360 133 145 133 MC1429 191 191 191 MC1449 160 95 160 MC1456 188 187 185 MC1484 122 124 117 MC1520 275 275 275 MC1523 199 200 200 MC1526 122 124 120 MC1538 239 225 239 MC1605 128 128 128 MC1662 167 167 161 MC1720 241 241 241 MC1732 110 110 100 MC1740 120 120 120 MC1782 228 228 228 MC1784 250 250 250 MC1808 129 129 137 MC1834 216 216216 MC1890 136 136 136 MC1904 183 183 174 MC1917 109 109 109 MC1931 170 170 170 MC1940 222 222 222 MC2047 146 145 146 MC2086 242 240 242 MC2122 254 254 254 MC2132 223 223 -- MC2259 173 203 -- MC2305 218 -- 218 NC004 156 156 156 NC009 119 119119 PHI017 105 -- 110 PHI024 171 171 177 PHI031 231 230 230 PHI033 257 257 257 PHI037 141 141 141 PHI050 92 92 86 PHI051 149 149 149 PHI061 85 85 -- PHI064 104 104 104 PHI065 158 158 158 PHI072 150 149 149 PHI078 129 129 -- PHI089 92 92 92 PHI096 109 109 -- PHI101 99 102 102 PHI116 177 177 177 PHI119 176 172 176 PHI120 75 72 76 Primers used to detect SSRs are from Celera AgGen, Inc., 1756 Picasso Ave., Davis, CA 95616
Another aspect of this invention is a plant genetic complement characterized by a genetic isozyme typing profile. Isozymes are forms of proteins that are distinguishable, for example, on starch gel electrophoresis, usually by charge and/ormolecular weight. The techniques and nomenclature for isozyme analysis are described in, for example, Stuber et al. (1988), which is incorporated by reference.
A standard set of loci can be used as a reference set. Comparative analysis of these loci is used to compare the purity of hybrid seeds, to assess the increased variability in hybrids compared to inbreds, and to determine the identity of seeds,plants, and plant parts. In this respect, an isozyme reference set can be used to develop genotypic "fingerprints." Table 6 lists the identifying numbers of the alleles at isozyme loci types, and represents the exemplary genetic isozyme typing profilefor I501150.
TABLE 6 Isozyme Profile of Corn Variety I501150 and Comparative Corn Varieties ISOZYME ALLELE LOCI I501150 I754206 I649539 Acph1 2 2 2 Idh1 4 4 4 Idh2 4 4 4 Mdh1 6 6 6 Mdh2 3.5 3.5 3.5 Mdh3 16 16 16 Mdh4 12 12 12 Mdh5 12 12 12 Pgm1 99 9 Pgm2 4 4 4 6Pgd1 3.8 2 3.8 6Pgd2 5 5 5
The present invention also provides a hybrid genetic complement formed by the combination of a haploid genetic complement of the corn plant I501150 with a haploid genetic complement of a second corn plant. Means for combining a haploid geneticcomplement from the foregoing inbred with another haploid genetic complement can comprise any method for producing a hybrid plant from I501150. It is contemplated that such a hybrid genetic complement can be prepared using in vitro regeneration of atissue culture of a hybrid plant of this invention.
A hybrid genetic complement contained in the seed of a hybrid derived from I501150 is a further aspect of this invention. Table 7 shows an exemplary SSR genetic marker profile for a hybrid derived from the inbred of the present invention.
TABLE 7 SSR Profile of Hybrid 9903904 LOCUS Hybrid 9903904 BNGL105 094.092 BNGL118 110.127 BNGL244 192.144 BNGL426 119.107 BNGL589 175.156 BNGL615 227.210 BNGL619 234.257 DUP14 112.079 MC1014 169.150 MC1018 130.130 MC1028 159.161 MC1043 175.147 MC1046 218.194 MC1065 230.230 MC1070 250.250 MC1074 186.176 MC1079 177.173 MC1094 184.178 MC1108 144.144 MC1129 208.204 MC1131 115.117 MC1138 186.190 MC1176 220.254 MC1182 106.082 MC1189 219.226 MC1191 238.209 MC1194 177.143 MC1208 111.104 MC1237 159.159 MC1265 246.244 MC1305 196.160 MC1325 179.181 MC1360 133.149 MC1456 188.177 MC1484 122.124 MC1520 275.298 MC1526 122.114 MC1538 239.223 MC1605 128.110 MC1662 167.161 MC1720 241.241 MC1732 110.102 MC1740 120.129 MC1782 228.228 MC1784 250.248 MC1808 129.143 MC1834 216.208 MC1890 136.142 MC1904 183.172 MC1917 109.115 MC1931 170.170 MC2047 146.144 MC2086 242.247 MC2122 254.240 MC2132 223.223 MC2259 173.177 MC2305 218.190 NC004 156.156 NC009 119.149 PHI031 231.194 PHI033 257.257 PHI037 141.137 PHI050 092.090 PHI061 085.097 PHI064 104.084 PHI065 158.148 PHI072 150.158 PHI078 129.129 PHI101 099.099 PHI116 177.181 PHI119 176.168 PHI120 075.075 Primers used to detect SSRs are from CeleraAgGen, Inc., 1756 Picasso Ave., Davis, CA 95616
The exemplary hybrid genetic complements of hybrids may also be assessed by genetic isozyme typing profiles using a standard set of loci as a reference set, using, e.g., the same, or a different, set of loci to those described above. Table 8lists exemplary isozyme loci types for the genetic isozyme typing of an exemplary hybrid derived from the inbred of the present invention.
TABLE 8 Isozyme Profile for Hybrid 9903904 Loci Isozyme Allele Acph1 2/4 Idh1 4/4 Idh2 4/6 Mdh1 6/6 Mdh2 3.5/6 Mdh3 16/16 Mdh4 12/12 Mdh5 12/12 Pgm1 9/9 Pgm2 4/8 6-Pgd1 3.8/3.8 6-Pgd2 5/5
All of the compositions and methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of theforegoing illustrative embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations, changes, modifications, and alterations may be applied to the composition, methods, and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the methodsdescribed herein, without departing from the true concept, spirit, and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents that are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents describedherein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope, and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are specifically incorporated herein by reference. Anderson, W. P., Weed Science Principles, West PublishingCompany, 1983. Armstrong and Green, "Establishment and maintenance of friable, embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline," Planta, 164:207-214, 1985. Conger, Novak, Afza, Erdelsky, "Somatic Embryogenesis from Cultured Leaf Segments ofZea Mays," Plant Cell Reports, 6:345-347, 1987. Duncan et al., "The Production of Callus Capable of Plant Regeneration from Immature Embryos of Numerous Zea Mays Genotypes," Planta, 165:322-332, 1985. Fehr, "Theory and Technique," In: Principles ofCultivar Development, 1:360-376, 1987. Gaillard et al., "Optimization of Maize Microspore Isolation and Culture Condition for Reliable Plant Regeneration," Plant Cell Reports, 10(2):55, 1991. Gordon-Kamm et al., "Transformation of Maize Cells andRegeneration of Fertile Transgenic Plants," The Plant Cell, 2:603-618, 1990. Green and Rhodes, "Plant Regeneration in Tissue Cultures of Maize: Callus Formation from Stem Protoplasts of Corn (Zea Mays L.)," In: Maize for Biological Research, 367-372,1982. Jensen, "Chromosome Doubling Techniques in Haploids," Haploids and Higher Plants--Advances and Potentials, Proceedings of the First International Symposium, 1974. Nienhuis et al., "Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of LociAssociated with Insect Resistance in Tomato," Crop Science, 27(4):797-803, 1987. Omirulleh et al., "Activity of a chimeric promoter with the doubled CaMV 35S enhancer element in protoplast-derived cells and transgenic plants in maize," Plant Mol. Biol,21(3):415-428, 1993. Pace et al., "Anther Culture of Maize and the Visualization of Embryogenic Microspores by Fluorescent Microscopy," Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 73:863-869, 1987. Poehlman et al., "Breeding Field Crops," 4th Ed., Iowa StateUniversity Press, Ames, Iowa, pp 132-155 and 321-344, 1995. Rao et al., "Somatic Embryogenesis in Glume Callus Cultures," Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 60, 1986. Songstad et al., "Effect of 1-Aminocyclopropate-1-Carboxylic Acid, SilverNitrate, and Norbornadiene on Plant Regeneration from Maize Callus Cultures," Plant Cell Reports, 7:262-265, 1988. Sprague and Dudley (eds.), "Corn and Corn Improvement," 3rd Ed., Crop Science of America, Inc., and Soil Science of America, Inc., MadisonWis. pp 881-883 and pp 901-918, 1988. Stuber et al., "Techniques and scoring procedures for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes of maize C. Zea mays, L.," Tech. Bull., 286, 1988. Wan et al., "Efficient Production of Doubled Haploid Plants ThroughColchicine Treatment of Anther-Derived Maize Callus," Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 77:889-892, 1989. Wang et al., "Large-Scale Identification, Mapping, and Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Human Genome," Science, 280:1077-1082,1998. Williams et al., "Oligonucleotide Primers of Arbitrary Sequence Amplify DNA Polymorphisms which Are Useful as Genetic Markers," Nucleic Acids Res., 18:6531-6535, 1990.
* * * * *