Been kinda busy lately, and very slowly catching up.
While reading the svn diffs, I came across:
+ o Some field_list() functions use the do_nothing manipulator, while
+ others use the quote manipulator. Standardize on one. Probably
+ do_nothing will work in all cases, because field names that work
+ as SSQLS member variable names don't need quoting or escaping.
+ But, among the fancier SSQLS features is the ability to use
+ different C++ variable names than the SQL table uses for field
+ names. Is it worth breaking that compatibility?
I can imagine a case where a MySQL table uses a C++ keyword as a field name,
which would require SSQLS to support different names.