Powering this software “generator” appears to require more human effort and input than People’s headline lets on though it is nonetheless amusing. The text result reads something like remedial freshman poetry (perhaps the inexact nature of the program’s vocabulary inadvertently mimics the abstractions and allusions of amateurish verse).
I do wonder what the corporate publishing world is making of this. If the executives indeed believe that words are cheaper and less meaningful than pennies, the answer may be painfully obvious.
While publishers and information providers chase new technologies to rework or transform their capabilities, we learn that the IRS relies upon software applications in use during the Kennedy Administration.
Tip of the hat to ATR. (However, I wonder if this is as “bad” a thing as ATR believes.)
While Donna Reed raised her TV family, the IRS was using its still existing (2015) software
The Supreme Court’s February/March argument calendar includes the case of King v. Burwell on March 4. King centers on the issue of statutory authority for a federal health care exchange. For those who have used the exchange, received credits, or are otherwise impacted, it appears that another tax year has begun bearing the fruits of uncertainty.
Read it here. We will see just how dynamic (or utterly predictable) the legal minds of those nine judges are as machines compete with humans to predict the case results in this term’s FantasySCOTUS.