The “Fake” Soto Grave-Yard Pictures
Fraudster extraordinaire, Carlee Soto, is at it again, assaulting the world through so-called social media mediums, Twitter and InstaGram.
Her tweets are hedonistic, obscene, and vile and could never be permitted even in the major, contrived media, let alone on this site without censorship. Therefore, their reproduction, here, is senseless. They can be reviewed at: https://twitter.com/ICarlee23
They clear show a kind of Psyops operation by Soto and collaborators aimed at the people’s senses.
Here are the two grave yard pictures tweeted by Soto through InstaGram, first the one of a simple plot of dirt with a few adornments:
Note that there is no grave stone. How could there be? No one died. That was followed by her posting of this photo, which, once again, has that appearance of being contrived:
In fact, it is contrived or, rather, photoshopped. How vile: Carlee Soto and her clan even willingly profane the visit among the deceased. Or, did they really visit?
There was no visit. It’s a fake. On the left screen that straight line is the edge of a house. Then, there should be trees in the background. Instead, there is a whitish fuzzy area, where the tree trunks and limbs are fully brushed out. That was the result of the installation of a photoshopped image. There are three humps at the top of the brushed out section, from the brush tool as the strokes were put in. If you look carefully there also appear to be blur marks on Carlos Soto’s forehead to crop off some of the bangs: give him a different look.
There is more in the background than this. The area between the two heads is brushed. The left edge of Carlos Soto’s face has a rigid line that cannot be a shadow and, thus, must be the result of cut-and-paste. There is also a cut line, clearly evident, marked with the red arrow. Also, Jillian Soto’s hair edge is rigid from the cut-and-paste operation. Jillian’s hair also has a see-through area, which seems anomalous.
What about these two? How is this normal?
Those are some significant stretch marks on Jillian Soto’s neck, another fake head shot. Carlee Soto appears completely abnormal; what a terrible, low resolution photo to put on-line. I thought she was an actress? What is she doing representing herself so inadequately? Furthermore, how can this defect be explained?
Does poor resolution or reflection account for a triangle of pink matter on her jaw and cheek? The photo is a complete fraud. Just like Victoria Soto wasn’t at the school that day, neither did the Soto clan visit this grave yard, as acclaimed. Regardless, the triangle anomaly is also visible without enlargement, so it is not strictly a defect of compression or pixilation:
Moreover, what is going on with the stance of Carlee Soto? How is this normal?
What is she attempting to portray, the “leaning tower of Soto?” No wonder they placed that inane green t-shirt before her to cover-up the obvious photographic corruption. Again, who can possible explain a stance at this angle in a normal stand-up photograph?
What about that Carlos Mathew Soto head shot in the grave-site picture? Seen that anywhere else?
It can be seen that it is the same head, recycled. Yet, how are the people to know? Their pitiful eyes deceive them. Note, for instance, that the eye squint and the dimple are the same in each photo.
It would appear that the entire purpose of Carlee Soto on Twitter (or, rather, her handlers who urge her onward) is to impale Americans with emotionally charged commentary, all to keep their minds in disarray and to keep the blood boiling towards gun control. She does so while simultaneously publishing the most lurid, lewd commentary possible, with special cohorts whose whole purpose is tweeting about ‘sex.’ In fact, other than blatant nudity by Soto herself (it is hoped that she doesn’t go that far; seeing her face repeatedly is grotesque enough) her tweet ‘channel’ virtually qualifies as a porno site.
Once again, Carlee Soto violates all norms by honoring a fake grave site and far worse, posting a fabricated photo of a grave visitation which never occurred. How could she have time or even the desire to go there? She is too busy following her own hedonistic fancies.