posted on May, 18 2008 @ 01:08 AM
This cannot be a lens flare as so many on youtube suggested. Why? because..
If you look at the actual video footage towards the end, at 1:26, one minute and twenty six seconds into the entire video, you will see the Sun being
completely obstructed from the camera's view by a portion of what appears to be the back door, or screen door. It covers up the sun for like,
a second at 1:26, and although theres no direct sun rays hitting the camera lens for that moment, the object in the sky is still there, perfectly
clear. If it were a lens flare or some light reflection, the glowing circle beside the sun would disappear when the sun itself became totally
obstructed from the camera via an object; in this case the door, i think.
For example, if the reflection of a light is causing a "dot", when the source of the reflection becomes completely obstructed, there is no
direct point A to point B light transfer, therefore no direct rays were hitting the lens causing a flare. If he hadn't accidentally moved to
the right for a second at 1:26, there'd be no way I could believe that it wasn't hoaxed up. But its because it was covered that it seems real. I
know how lens flare works, if you have a ball of light, all it is .. is a powerful reflection of the Sun or another light source directly hitting the
lens. It reflects, and the camera also captures the image of the reflection of light as well as the light source for which the camera was likely being
used to take pictures of.
Not saying it's Nibiru, just saying it is some type of planetary body, I think there's hidden proof in the video.
[edit on 5/18/2008 by runetang]