Direct and indirect effects of area, energy and habitat heterogeneity on breeding bird communities
Article first published online: 8 FEB 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Journal of Biogeography
Volume 38, Issue 6, pages 1186–1196, June 2011
How to Cite
Jonsson, M., Englund, G. and Wardle, D. A. (2011), Direct and indirect effects of area, energy and habitat heterogeneity on breeding bird communities. Journal of Biogeography, 38: 1186–1196. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02470.x
- Issue published online: 11 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 8 FEB 2011
- energy availability;
- habitat heterogeneity;
- habitat selection;
- island ecology;
- species richness;
- structural equation modelling;
Aim To compare the ability of island biogeography theory, niche theory and species–energy theory to explain patterns of species richness and density for breeding bird communities across islands with contrasting characteristics.
Location Thirty forested islands in two freshwater lakes in the boreal forest zone of northern Sweden (65°55′ N to 66°09′ N; 17°43′ E to 17°55′ E).
Methods We performed bird censuses on 30 lake islands that have each previously been well characterized in terms of size, isolation, habitat heterogeneity (plant diversity and forest age), net primary productivity (NPP), and invertebrate prey abundance. To test the relative abilities of island biogeography theory, niche theory and species–energy theory to describe bird community patterns, we used both traditional statistical approaches (linear and multiple regressions) and structural equation modelling (SEM; in which both direct and indirect influences can be quantified).
Results Using regression-based approaches, area and bird abundance were the two most important predictors of bird species richness. However, when the data were analysed by SEM, area was not found to exert a direct effect on bird species richness. Instead, terrestrial prey abundance was the strongest predictor of bird abundance, and bird abundance in combination with NPP was the best predictor of bird species richness. Area was only of indirect importance through its positive effect on terrestrial prey abundance, but habitat heterogeneity and spatial subsidies (emerging aquatic insects) also showed important indirect influences. Thus, our results provided the strongest support for species–energy theory.
Main conclusions Our results suggest that, by using statistical approaches that allow for analyses of both direct and indirect influences, a seemingly direct influence of area on species richness can be explained by greater energy availability on larger islands. As such, animal community patterns that seem to be in line with island biogeography theory may be primarily driven by energy availability. Our results also point to the need to consider several aspects of habitat quality (e.g. heterogeneity, NPP, prey availability and spatial subsidies) for successful management of breeding bird diversity at local spatial scales and in fragmented or insular habitats.