|Publication number||US7470027 B2|
|Application number||US 11/492,716|
|Publication date||Dec 30, 2008|
|Filing date||Jul 24, 2006|
|Priority date||Dec 3, 2004|
|Also published as||US20070028931|
|Publication number||11492716, 492716, US 7470027 B2, US 7470027B2, US-B2-7470027, US7470027 B2, US7470027B2|
|Inventors||W. Daniel Hillis, Roderick A. Hyde, Muriel Y. Ishikawa, Edward K. Y. Jung, Nathan P. Myhrvold, Clarence T. Tegreene, Lowell L. Wood, JR.|
|Original Assignee||Searete Llc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (100), Non-Patent Citations (31), Referenced by (2), Classifications (14), Legal Events (5) |
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Temporal vision modification
US 7470027 B2
Various embodiments of methods and systems for improving and enhancing vision are disclosed. Adjustable lenses or optical systems may be used to provide adaptive vision modification. In some embodiments, vision modification may be responsive to the current state of the user's visual system. Certain embodiments provide correction of the subject's near and far vision. Other embodiments provide enhancement of vision beyond the physiological ranges of focal length or magnification.
1. A method of controlling a lens system, comprising the steps of:
a) Receiving an image signal representing a time-varying image detected from an eye of a subject;
b) Determining at least one quality of said image from said image signal;
c) Generating a lens system control signal in response to said at least one quality of said image; and
d) Sending said lens system control signal to an adjustable lens system, wherein said control signal is utilized to cause adjustment of said adjustable lens system to modify said at least one quality of said image.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said quality of said image is determined from at least a portion of said image detected from at least a portion of the fovea of the retina of said eye of said subject.
3. The method of claim 1, comprising the further step of detecting at least one feature in said image, and wherein said step of determining at least one quality of said image comprises determining a sharpness of said at least one feature.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining at least one quality of said image comprises detecting at least one landmark in said image.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said at least one landmark is in the foveal region of said image or is at least a portion of an optic nerve of said eye.
6. The method of claim 1, comprising the further step of tracking the position of at least a part of the fovea of the retina of said eye.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining said quality of said image comprises performing a spatial frequency analysis of at least a portion of said image signal within a spectral waveband.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said spatial frequency analysis includes at least one form of mathematical functional analysis.
9. The method of claim 8, in which the form of mathematical functional analysis includes Fourier transformation analysis.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein said Fourier transformation analysis includes determining a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).
11. The method of claim 8, comprising determining a peak spatial frequency content of said image signal.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein said image signal represents a time-varying image detected from a first position in said eye of said subject, and wherein determining said quality of said image signal comprises comparing said image signal with at least one reference image signal.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said at least one reference signal corresponds to an at least one image detected from a different spacetime location than the location corresponding to said image signal.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein said at least one reference signal comprises at least one previous instance of said image signal.
15. The method of claim 14, including determining at least one quality of said previous instance of said image signal and comparing said at least one quality of said image signal quality to said at least one quality of said reference signal.
16. The method of claim 15, further including generating a lens system control signal to adjust said lens system in the opposite direction of an immediately preceding lens system adjustment if said at least one quality of said reference signal is better than said at least one quality of said image signal.
17. The method of claim 15, further including generating a lens system control signal to adjust said lens system in the same direction as an immediately preceding lens system adjustment if said at least one quality of said reference signal is worse than said at least one quality of said image signal.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of generating a lens system control signal comprises determining a transfer function representing the optical system of said eye of said subject over some visible spectral waveband and some field-of-view centered on the fovea of said eye.
19. The method of claim 1, including repeating steps a) through d) at a rate faster than at least one of the intrinsic accommodation time of the lens of said eye or the visual pigment reversal-rate of the highest reversal-rate visual pigment found in the photoreceptors of said eye.
20. The method of claim 1, including repeating steps a) through d) at a frequency selected from least about once every 3 seconds, at least about once per second, and at least about three times per second.
21. The method of claim 1, including repeating steps a) through d) with an update rate selected from between about ⅓ Hz and about 10 Hz, between about 1 Hz and about 10 Hz, and between about 1 Hz and about 3 Hz.
22. A system for modifying the vision of a subject, comprising:
a) An adjustable optical system adapted to modify an input image impinging on the retina of an eye of the subject;
b) An image detector adapted to detect an image reflected from the retina;
c) An image analyzer for determining the quality of said reflected image; and
d) A controller for providing ongoing control of said adjustable optical system responsive to said quality of said reflected image.
23. The system of claim 22, wherein said controller generates a control signal for updating the setting of said adjustable optical system at a preset update rate.
24. The system of claim 23, wherein said controller comprises a device including a microprocessor, and wherein said update rate is controlled by a timer chip.
25. The system of claim 23, wherein said controller comprises a device including a microprocessor, and wherein said update rate is controlled by a software loop.
26. The system of claim 23, wherein said controller comprises digital hardware, and wherein said update rate is under hardware control.
27. The system of claim 22, comprising a second image detector adapted to detect a reference image.
28. The system of claim 22, wherein said adjustable optical system is adjusted faster than at least one of the intrinsic accommodation time of the lens of said eye or the visual pigment reversal-rate of the highest reversal-rate visual pigment present in the photoreceptors of said eye.
29. The system of claim 22, wherein said image analyzer comprises at least one of a device including a microprocessor, an application specific integrated circuit, or a digital signal processing chip.
30. A system for providing adaptive vision modification, comprising:
a) An image detector for detecting a time-varying image from at least a portion of a retina of an eye of a subject;
b) An image analyzer for determining the quality of said detected image;
c) An image modulator for modulating an input image impinging on at least a portion of said retina; and
d) A modulation controller for providing ongoing control of said image modulator in response to said quality of said detected image.
31. The system of claim 30, wherein said image modulator modifies the focal length of said input image.
32. The system of claim 30, wherein said image modulator modifies the magnification of said input image.
33. The system of claim 30, wherein said image modulator modifies one or more cylindrical focal properties including at least one of focal length or axis-of-orientation of said input image.
34. The system of claim 30, wherein said image modulator comprises an adjustable optical system.
35. The system of claim 30, wherein said image modulator modulates or controls at least one of the spectral content of said input image, the spatial frequency content of said input image, or the intensity of said input image in a spectral wavelength-dependent fashion.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application is related to and claims the benefit of the earliest available effective filing date(s) from the following listed application(s) (the “Related Applications”) (e.g., claims earliest available priority dates for other than provisional patent applications or claims benefits under 35 USC § 119(e) for provisional patent applications, for any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of the Related Application(s)).
- For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,713, entitled TEMPORAL VISION MODIFICATION, naming W. Daniel Hillis, Roderick A. Hyde, Muriel Y. Ishikawa, Edward K. Y. Jung, Nathan P. Myhrvold, Clarence T. Tegreene and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 3 Dec. 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,334,894.
- For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,473, entitled VISION MODIFICATION WITH REFLECTED IMAGE, naming W. Daniel Hillis, Roderick A. Hyde, Muriel Y. Ishikawa, Edward K. Y. Jung, Nathan P. Myhrvold, Clarence T. Tegreene and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 3 Dec. 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,350,919.
- For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,533, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VISION ENHANCEMENT, naming Eleanor V. Goodall, W. Daniel Hillis, Roderick A. Hyde, Muriel Y. Ishikawa, Edward K. Y. Jung, Nathan P. Myhrvold and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 3 Dec. 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,334,892.
- For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,731, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADAPTIVE VISION MODIFICATION, naming Eleanor V. Goodall, W. Daniel Hillis, Roderick A. Hyde, Muriel Y. Ishikawa, Edward K. Y. Jung, Nathan P. Myhrvold and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 3 Dec. 2004, which is currently co-pending, or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
- For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,551, entitled ADJUSTABLE LENS SYSTEM WITH NEURAL-BASED CONTROL, naming Eleanor V. Goodall, W. Daniel Hillis, Roderick A. Hyde, Muriel Y. Ishikawa, Edward K. Y. Jung, Nathan P. Myhrvold and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. inventors, filed 3 Dec. 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,344,244.
The United States Patent Office (USPTO) has published a notice to the effect that the USPTO's computer programs require that patent applicants reference both a serial number and indicate whether an application is a continuation or continuation-in-part. Stephen G. Kunin, Benefit of Prior-Filed Application, USPTO Official Gazette Mar. 18, 2003, available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2003/week11/patbene.htm. The present applicant entity has provided above a specific reference to the application(s) from which priority is being claimed as recited by statute. Applicant entity understands that the statute is unambiguous in its specific reference language and does not require either a serial number or any characterization, such as “continuation” or “continuation-in-part,” for claiming priority to U.S. patent applications. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant entity understands that the USPTO's computer programs have certain data entry requirements, and hence applicant entity is designating the present application as a continuation-in-part of its parent applications as set forth above, but expressly points out that such designations are not to be construed in any way as any type of commentary and/or admission as to whether or not the present application contains any new matter in addition to the matter of its parent application(s).
All subject matter of the Related Applications and of any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of the Related Applications is incorporated herein by reference to the extent such subject matter is not inconsistent herewith.
The present application relates, in general, to the field of optical systems for improving and enhancing vision.
The use of lenses for correcting vision problems produced by deficiencies in the optical system of the human eye has been known for many years. FIG. 1A illustrates, in schematic form, the anatomy of the human eye 10. Light enters eye 10 through cornea 12, passes through lens 14, and strikes retina 16, the light-detecting inner surface of the eye. The fovea 18 is a central region of retina 16 having particularly high acuity. Lens 14 is attached around its periphery to zonular fibers 20. Zonular fibers 20 are connected to ciliary body 22. Ciliary body 22 is a sphincter muscle which opens when it is relaxed, thereby generating tension in zonular fibers 20. Ciliary body 22 releases tension on zonular fibers 20 when it is contracted. Lens 14, because of its inherent elastic properties, tends to assume a rounded form when it is not subject to external forces. Thus, when ciliary body 22 contracts, lens 14 becomes more rounded, while relaxation of ciliary body 22 produces flattening of lens 14. Cornea 12 provides a significant portion of the refractive power of the optical train of the eye, but the capacity for accommodation is contributed by lens 14.
FIG. 1B illustrates a relaxed (unaccommodated) eye 10, in which lens 14 is flattened. As indicated by the solid lines in FIG. 1B, light from distant objects will be focused on retina 16 (and specifically, on fovea 18) by lens 14, but light from near objects (indicated by the dashed lines) will be focused behind the retina, and thus appear out of focus at the retina. FIG. 1C illustrates an accommodated eye 10, in which lens 14 has assumed a more rounded form. In the accommodated eye, light from near objects (indicated by dashed lines) is focused on retina 16 (fovea 18), while light from distant objects (indicated by solid lines) is focused in front of the retina, and thus is out of focus at retina 16.
In a normal, healthy eye, adjustment of lens 14 is sufficient to focus images on retina 16 within a wide range of distances between the visual target-object and the eye. Myopia (near-sightedness) and hypermetropia (far-sightedness) occur when images entering the eye are brought into focus in front or in back of the retina, respectively, rather than on the retina. This is typically caused by the eyeball being too long or too short relative to the focal-adjustment range of the lens. Eyeglasses with spherical focusing lenses of the appropriate optical refractive power can be used to compensate for myopia or hypermetropia. Another common and readily corrected visual problem is astigmatism, a focusing defect having orientation-dependence about the optical axis of the eye that may be corrected by interposition of a cylindrical lens having appropriate refractive power and axis angle of orientation. Other visual focus problems exist as well (e.g., coma and other higher order optical aberrations), but are less readily characterized and more difficult to correct in a practical manner. In general, focal problems caused by irregularities in the dimensions of the cornea, lens, or eyeball can be corrected providing the optical properties of the eye can be characterized and a suitable set of optical elements manufactured and then positioned relative to the eye.
Aging subjects may experience presbyopia, a decrease in the ability to focus on proximate visual targets caused by reduced flexibility of the eye lens. Difficulty in focusing on such proximate visual targets can be alleviated with the use of ‘reading glasses’. Subjects who require correction for myopia as well as presbyopia may use “bi-focal” glasses having lens regions that provide correction for both “near” and “far” vision. The subject selects the type of correction by looking toward the visual target through the appropriate portion of the lens. Elaborations and extensions on such systems are now common, including “trifocal glasses” and “progressive glasses,” the latter featuring a continuous gradation in optical properties across a portion of the eyeglass and thus of the visual field thereby regarded.
Adjustable optical systems are used in a wide variety of devices or instruments, including devices that enhance human vision beyond the physiological range, such as telescopes, binoculars, and microscopes, as well as a numerous devices for scientific and industrial applications independent of human vision, such as in test, measurement, control, and data transmission. Such devices typically make use of complex systems of multiple lenses and optical components that are moved with respect to each other to provide a desired level of focus and magnification. Adjustable lens systems that have been proposed for use in eyeglass-type vision enhancement include electroactive lenses, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,491,394 and 6,733,130 and various types of fluid lenses, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,466,706 and 6,542,309, as well as assorted multi lens systems (see e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,403,840 and 4,429,959).
Devices used to characterize certain parameters of the eye optics include phoropters and autorefractometry, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,500,180, 5,329,322 and 5,629,747. Wavefront analysis systems measure wavefront aberrations produced by the eye optics by delivering an optical signal to the eye that has a well-characterized wavelength and wavefront, and measuring the wavefront reflected from the retina.
Systems for imaging portions of the eye have been developed, such systems including fundus cameras, corneal topographers, retinal topographers, retinal imaging systems, and corneal imaging systems.
Aside from eyeglass—type devices, other systems which present modified visual inputs to the eye include “Virtual Reality” systems, and “heads up displays”.
A method and system for providing adaptive vision modification uses adjustable lens systems. Automatic, real-time lens adjustment may be used to correct the subject's near and far vision during routine activities or to provide vision enhancement beyond the physiological ranges of focal length or magnification in support of specialized activities. Automatic lens adjustment may be based upon detection of the current state of the subject's eye optics. Features of various embodiments will be apparent from the following detailed description and associated drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The exemplary embodiments may best be understood by making reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In the figures, like referenced numerals identify like elements.
FIG. 1A illustrates the anatomy of the eye;
FIG. 1B illustrates focusing of the normal eye for distance vision;
FIG. 1C illustrate focusing of the normal eye for near vision;
FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment configured as an eyeglass;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment;
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of the operation of the embodiment of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of an alternative implementation of the embodiment of FIG. 3;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment;
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of the embodiment of FIG. 6;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment in which a magnification factor input is accepted;
FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of the use of the embodiment depicted in FIG. 8;
FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of lens adjustment steps;
FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment having two parallel optical paths;
FIG. 12 illustrates the construction of an adjustable lens having two parallel optical subsystems;
FIG. 13 shows a helmet-mounted implementation;
FIG. 14 shows implementation in an alternative mounting;
FIG. 15 illustrates an embodiment implemented in a contact lens;
FIG. 16 illustrates an embodiment implemented as an intraocular lens device; and
FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram of the embodiment shown in FIG. 16.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. The detailed description and the drawings illustrate specific exemplary embodiments by which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is therefore not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
Throughout the specification and claims, the following terms take the meanings explicitly associated herein unless the context dictates otherwise. The meaning of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references. The meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on.” A reference to the singular includes a reference to the plural unless otherwise stated or inconsistent with the disclosure herein. In particular, though reference is frequently made to “the eye”, “the lens” or the “lens system”, in most embodiments two lenses or lens systems will be used, one for each eye of the subject, and that, while the operation of the lenses or lens systems will typically be the same, they will typically be adjusted separately to meet the individual needs of the two eyes.
FIG. 2 illustrates the basic components of an exemplary embodiment. Adjustable lens system 26 is positioned with respect to eye 10 of subject 28 through the use of mounting 30, which in this embodiment is an eyeglass frame. Output image detector 32, here mounted on mounting 30, detects an image reflected from eye 10 of subject 28. Input image detector 35 may be provided for detecting an incident image. A light source 33 may be mounted in mounting 30 and used to provide supplemental illumination to the eye during image detection. Note that while a single light source 33 and two detectors 32 and 35 are illustrated, in certain embodiments multiple light sources 33 or detectors 32 and 35 may be positioned in mounting 30. The detected image signal from detector 32 is routed to processor 34. Processor 34 processes the detected image signal to generate a control signal that drives adjustable lens system 26 to provide an enhanced visual input to subject 28. Power supply 36, mounted in mounting 30, provides power to adjustable lens system 26, detectors 32 and 35, light source 33, and processor 34.
FIG. 3 illustrates, in greater detail and in schematic form, components of an embodiment of a system as depicted in FIG. 2. An incident image 40 a of a visual target 40 passes through adjustable lens system 26. The incident image is then transmitted through the eye optics 44, which typically include the cornea and the lens of the eye (see intermediate incident images 40 b and 40 c), and strikes retina 16 to form retinal image 46. Retinal image 46 is reflected back from retina 16, passes back through eye optics 44 (see intermediate reflected images 46 a and 46 b) where reflected image 48 is detected by output image detector 32. Output image detector 32 creates a representation of reflected image 48 as output image signal 52, which is transmitted to processor 34. The main functional components of processor 34 are image analyzer 54 and lens controller 58. These and other components of processor 34 are discussed in greater detail herein below.
Processor 34 may include various combinations of analog or digital electronic circuitry, discrete components or integrated circuits, and/or hardware, software, or firmware under computer or microprocessor control, including optical analog devices. Processor 34 may include a variety of functional and/or structural components for supporting the function of image analyzer 54 and lens controller 58, such as memory, timing, and data transmission structures and devices. Output image signal 52 is processed by image analyzer 56 to determine the quality of the retinal image. An image quality signal 60 representing the quality of the retinal image is generated by image analyzer 56 and sent to lens controller 58. Lens controller 58 generates lens control signal 62, which is sent to adjustable lens system 26. Adjustable lens system 26. Lens controller 58 may also receive as input a lens state signal 68 from adjustable lens system 26, lens state signal 68 providing information regarding the state of adjustable lens system 26. Lens state information may be used in computations performed by one or both of image analyzer 56 and lens controller 58. Adjustable lens system 26, image detector 32, and processor 34 and its components, image analyzer 56 and lens controller 58, may all be powered by power supply 36. Alternatively, certain components may have separate power sources; the invention is not limited to any particular power supply configuration.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing in general terms the process used by the system of FIG. 3. A reflected image is detected from the eye at step 82. The quality of the detected image is determined at step 84, and the adjustable lens system is adjusted in response to the determined quality of the image at step 86. In order to provide on-going adaptive vision modification, after step 86, at branch point 88, control returns to step 82 and steps 82 through 86 are repeated for as long as adaptive vision modification is desired.
FIG. 5 depicts a variant of the process diagrammed in FIG. 4. The reflected image is detected from the eye at step 94. Rather than determine the quality of the entire retinal image, the position of the fovea within the image is determined at step 96, and the quality of the foveal image is then determined at step 98. At step 100, the lens system is adjusted in response to the quality of the foveal image. At branch point 102, if ongoing adaptive vision modification is to be provided, process control returns to step 94 and steps 94 through 100 are repeated to provide on-going adaptive vision modification.
FIG. 6 illustrates, in schematic form, functional components of a second embodiment. As in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 3, incident image 40 a passes through adjustable lens system 42. Incident image 40 a is detected by input image detector 35; intermediate incident image 40 b subsequently passes through eye optics 44 to retina 16. Retinal image 46 is reflected from retina 16, passes back through eye optics 44 (see reflected images 46 a, 46 b) to form reflected image 48 which is detected by output image detector 32. Input image detector 35 creates a representation of incident image 40 as input image signal 112, while output image detector 32 creates a representation of reflected image 48 as an output image signal 52. Input image signal 112 and output image signal 52 are both transmitted to image analyzer 56 in processor 34, where the image data is processed to obtain a comparative measure of the quality of the retinal image.
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of the control flow used by the system of FIG. 6. An input image is detected at step 122, and a reflected image is detected at step 124. The quality of the output (reflected) image relative to the input (incident) image is determined at step 126, and the adjustable lens system is adjusted in response to the determined quality of the reflected image at step 128. At branch point 130, control returns to step 122, and steps 122 through 128 are repeated for as long as desired to provide on-going adaptive vision modification.
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment suited for certain specialized applications requiring image magnification outside the physiological range of human vision. As in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, an incident image 40 a passes through adjustable lens system 26. Intermediate incident image 40 b is transmitted through the eye optics 44 and strikes retina 16 to form retinal image 46. Intermediate reflected image 46 a passes back through eye optics 44 to form reflected image 48 at output image detector 32. Output image detector 32 detects reflected image 48 and generates a representation of it as output image signal 52, which is transmitted to processor 34. Output image signal 52 is processed by image analyzer 56 to determine the quality of the retinal image. An image quality signal 60 representing the quality of the reflected image is generated by image analyzer 56 and sent to lens controller 58. Processor 34 is adapted to also receive a magnification factor input 140. Magnification factor input 140 may be entered into processor 34 by various methods; it may be preprogrammed at a fixed value or entered by the subject. It is contemplated that the magnification factor will be used for special applications (e.g., close-up detail work or viewing distant objects) and that the subject may prefer to adjust the magnification to meet the requirements of a particular application. Manual selection of the magnification factor may be accomplished, for example, by configuring the device with one or more preprogrammed magnification factor values, and having the subject press a button on the eyeglass frame to cycle through magnification values until arriving at the desired magnification value; clearly, provision also may be made for continuously-variable magnification control. Alternatively, the magnification factor may be determined adaptively, e.g. by calculation of the magnification necessary to expand a detected visual target to fill a selected percentage of the users field of view.
As shown in FIG. 8, taking into account magnification factor input 140, lens controller 58 generates lens control signal 62, which is sent to adjustable lens system 26. Lens controller 58 may also receive as input a lens state signal 68 from adjustable lens system 26, which provides information regarding the current state of adjustable lens system 26.
FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of the process used for controlling the embodiment depicted in FIG. 8. The magnification factor input is accepted at step 148, either by detecting a user-entered value, reading a stored or calculated value from a memory location, or by other mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. The main process loop is then entered. The reflected image is detected at step 132, the quality of the reflected image is determined at step 152, and the lens system is adjusted based on the quality of the reflected image and on the magnification factor at step 154. At branch point 156 process control returns to step 132 and steps 132 through 154 are repeated to provide on-going adaptive vision modification for as long as vision modification at the selected magnification is desired. Note that the process depicted in FIG. 9 may be part of a larger process, and that by including additional control loops, it would be a simple matter to provide for the input of an updated desired magnification factor value, during an ongoing control process.
As illustrated by the foregoing examples, the exemplary systems comprise a number of basic components, the structure and operation of which will now be described in greater detail. As illustrated in FIG. 2, these components are: an adjustable lens system 26, one or more image detectors (image detector 32, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 6, and input image detector 35 as shown in FIG. 6); processor 34, which includes an image analyzer 56, and lens controller 58, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 6; and power supply 36.
Various types of adjustable lens systems may be used in practice, and the invention is not limited to any particular type of adjustable lens system. However, certain adjustable lens systems may be more suitable than others, with small size, low weight, rapid adjustment, and compatibility with other system components being considerations for some applications. Depending on the particular intended application, certain considerations may be of greater importance than others, and thus the best choice of lens system will vary from application to application. While in some cases a single lens may be used, the term “lens system”, as used herein, refers to systems made up of one or more lenses and, optionally, additional optical elements or components including but not limited to reflectors, beam splitters, refractive elements, active and passive filters, and so forth.
Conventional eyeglass lenses and contact lenses are typically characterized by their spherical lens strength or optical power (typically expressed in positive or negative diopters, the reciprocal of their focal length measured in meters-distance), cylindrical lens strength, and cylindrical axis orientation. Lenses may modulate the spatial frequency content of an image formed thereby (e.g., by adjusting the focus of the image) and may also modulate the light intensity of the image as a function of wavelength, by spectrally-dispersive properties of their bulk composition or coatings applied to their surfaces, for example. Suitable adjustable lens systems may be characterized by these and additional focus or image-quality parameters. Lens systems may be used to provide image magnification outside the physiological range of human vision, and hence may be characterized by a magnification strength factor as well. An adjustable lens system used to provide vision correction may preferably permit the adjustment of each of these parameters, although in particular applications and for particular subjects, not all of these parameters may need to be adjusted. Independent adjustment of each of the various parameters may be desirable in some cases, but in many cases may not be required.
A number of designs for fluid-based adjustable lenses have been proposed which may be suitable for use. Fluid lenses utilize one or more fluids having appropriately selected indices of refraction. One approach is to enclose fluid within a deformable shell, and to increase fluid volume or pressure to deform the shell and thus change the optical strength of the lens, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,466,706, 5,182,585, 5,684,637, 6,069,742, 6,542,309 and 6,715,876, which are incorporated herein by reference. Another approach is to utilize two immiscible liquids of differing refractive properties contained within a chamber, and modify the shape of the fluid-fluid interface in order to change the optical strength of the lens. The surface tension properties of the interior of a chamber are modified, for example, through an applied voltage (and thus electric field and gradients thereof) to adjust the shape of the fluid-fluid interface. Such fluid lenses, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,369,954, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may also be suitable for use in some embodiments.
Another suitable type of adjustable lens system may be an electro-active lens as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,300,818, 6,491,394 and 6,733,130, also incorporated herein by reference. These lenses include one or more layers of liquid crystal or polymer gel having refractive power that may be modulated, e.g. electrically. An advantage of this type of lens is the refractive power can be adjusted selectively in different regions of the lens, making it possible to produce nearly any desired lens, including a lens that compensates for higher order optical aberrations, or a lens having regions with different focal strengths (comparable to a bi-focal or tri-focal lens), such that all or a portion of the lens can be adjusted. It is also possible to construct a lens system that can be rapidly switched from one focal length to another with the use of this technology.
In some embodiments, an adjustable lens system may be made up of multiple lenses or other optical elements. Lens system adjustment may include moving one optical element with respect to another or with respect to the subject. Such movements may include one or all of changing the distance, angle-of-orientation, or off-axis displacement between two or more optical elements. The adjustable lens system may include a lens mechanism and a lens actuator that is used for actuating the lens mechanism. Thus, the lens mechanism itself may not receive control signals directly from the lens controller. The lens mechanism and lens actuator may be formed integrally, or they may be separate elements depending on the design of the lens system.
As used herein, “lens system” refers to systems made up of one or more lenses and, optionally, additional optical elements or components including but not limited to reflectors, beam splitters, active and passive filters, and so forth. An “adjustable lens system” is a lens system in which one or more optical properties of the system can be adjusted. Adjustable lens systems may modify incident light in some specified matter. Adjustable lens systems may bend (refract) incident light rays; they may also filter the incident light to modify the spectral composition of the incident light or to change the light intensity at one or more selected spectral wavelengths or wavebands.
As used herein, the term “optical system” is defined generally to mean a system that is capable of modifying an incident image or pattern of light to produce a modified image or pattern of light. In a broad sense, an optical system may be any device or system that receives an input image and produces an output image that is a modified version of the input image. As such, optical systems may include lens systems. In addition, in certain embodiments the modified image is not formed entirely or even in significant part of incident light that has been transmitted through the optical system, but partly or mostly (including entirely) of light that has been generated by the optical system to form a new image. In some embodiments, the term ‘optical system’ may encompass systems including cameras and displays. Such an optical system may modulate the input image in ways not possible with lenses or lens systems that transmit incident light; e.g., the optical system may transform the incident image by shifting the spectral content or intensity of some or all wavelengths relative to the incident light corresponding to the image. Adjusting either lens systems or optical systems may include adjusting one or more focal lengths, adjusting one or more cylindrical corrections, adjusting one or more distances of an optical element relative to an eye of the subject or adjusting the orientation-angle of the optical element with respect to the optical axis of the eye or adjusting the off-axis displacement of one or more optical elements relative to the optical axis of the eye or adjusting the pan-or-tilt of one or more optical elements relative to the optical axis of the eye.
One or more image detectors or sensors may be used for detecting images reflected from the eye and, in some embodiments, input (incident) images impinging on the eye. A number of existing technologies may be suitable for performing image detection, and the practice is not limited to any particular type of image detector. Suitable detectors include those of the type used in retinoscopes, phoropters, autorefractors, and the like, and particularly those which are capable of providing rapid image update rates. The term “image detector”, as used herein refers to devices or systems capable of detecting an image of the eye, and is intended to encompass detection systems that include one or more individual light detecting elements in combination with other optical system components, such as scanning mirrors, lenses, controllers, and data acquisition or storage elements. Examples of suitable detectors include CCD cameras or systems based on photodiodes or photomultipliers. See for example, the image detection systems described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,227,667 and 6,523,955, which are incorporated herein by reference. Image detectors may detect light signals from multiple positions in an imaged area of the eye simultaneous or sequentially. Sequential detection systems may employ either one or both of a detector and an illumination source that are scanned across the area to be imaged, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,227,667. While in some cases it is preferred that detection is performed without providing supplemental illumination to the eye of the subject, in certain embodiments, supplemental illumination of the eye may be provided by a light source 33 as depicted in FIG. 2, which may be, for example, an IR laser. Supplemental illumination is preferably outside the visible range and must be of an intensity that is not harmful to the eye. Use of supplemental illumination during retinal imaging is known to those of skill in the art.
Image detectors can be positioned in or on the mount in which the corrective lens is mounted as depicted in FIG. 2, or in or on the lens itself. Image detectors can be positioned in or on a contact lens, or intraocular lens device as well as an eyeglass lens, by using suitable microfabrication techniques. Methods for microfabrication of optical components such as photodiodes and mirrors are known in the art (see, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,306,926, 5,629,790, 6,177,800, 6,379,989, 6,399,405, 6,580,858, 6,658,179, 6,744,550, and 6,762,867, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety). The image detector may be formed separately from the lens system or mounting and subsequently attached thereto, or formed integrally with the lens system or mounting. Detectors for detecting images reflected from the retina or other structures within the eye will preferably be directed toward the eye of the subject, e.g., by forming the detectors on the inner surface of the corrective lens. Conversely, detectors for detecting incident (input) images may preferably be directed outward with respect to the eye, e.g., by forming the detectors on the outer surface of the corrective lens. However, the invention is not limited to any particular sensor position or orientation, since additional optical elements (mirrors, prisms, lenses, etc.) may be used to direct the image to the sensor for any given sensor placement.
The image detector may be located at a distance from the image analyzer, and detected image signals transmitted to the image analyzer by a transmitter. In this case, the image analyzer can also function as a receiving location, and may include a receiver for receiving the image signal transmitted by the detector. The image detector may detect at least one component of a finite fraction of a time-varying image. A component may include, but is not limited to, a wavelength band component, a spatial frequency component, a spatial or areal component, or other detectable or determinable components of an image or portion of an image. The terms “finite fraction” or “portion”, as used herein, refer to a part, portion, fraction, or percentage of something (in this case, an image), up to and including 100 percent or the entirety of the thing in question.
While discussion herein is focused on detecting images reflected from the retina of the eye (also known as “retinal reflex” images), i.e., “output image signal” the approaches herein are also considered to include systems in which images reflected from other structures within the eye are measured in order to determine the current optical properties of the eye, and particularly the lens, and control the quality of the image on the retina. For example, it would also be possible to measure an image reflected from the back surface of the eye lens, and to calculate the image at the retina based upon knowledge of the dimensions of the eye and the optical characteristics of the medium (the vitreous humor) filling the space between the lens and the retina. In certain embodiments, it may be advantageous to detect images reflected from several locations within the eye and utilize the differential image information to determine the optical properties of the eye. Thus, the input or reference image may not be an incident image detected from a location external to the eye, as described above, but may be an image detected from within the eye. For example, images reflected from the cornea or the front surface of the lens may be detected. The approaches herein are not limited to use of images detected from any specific location. If images are detected from more than one region of the eye, two or more separate image detectors may be used. Alternatively, one detector may be used to detect images from two or more locations in the eye, using reflectors or other optical elements to switch between the different locations.
As illustrated in FIG. 3, the main functional components of processor 34 are image analyzer 56 and lens controller 58. Processor 34 may include various combinations of analog or digital logic circuitry in the form of discrete components or integrated circuits, hardware, software, and/or firmware under computer or microprocessor control. Processor 34 may also include various functional and/or structural components such as memory, timing, and data processing, transmission, and reception structures and devices necessary to support the operation of image analyzer 56 and lens controller 58. It will be recognized by one skilled in the art that the functions and operation of Processor 34 may be implemented in software, in firmware, in special purpose digital logic, or any combination thereof, and that the design of processor 34 to perform the image analysis and lens control tasks described below may be performed in various ways by a practitioner of ordinary skill in the relevant art. Digital signal processing (DSP) chips or devices suitable for image processing are commercially available or may be designed for specific applications. Processor 34 may be implemented in hardware (e.g. as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit) to minimize size and weight of the system while maximizing speed of operation. Alternatively, some portions of processor 34 may be implemented in software running on a microprocessor-based system. This will provide greater flexibility, relative to specialized hardware, but system size and weight generally will be increased. Although processor 34 (including image analyzer 56 and lens controller 58) may be packaged as a single unit, in some cases it may be preferable to package certain components separately. For example, as discussed previously, processor 34 may include a receiver for receiving an image signal transmitted from a detector and a transmitter for transmitting control signals to the adjustable lens system.
Tasks performed by the image analyzer may include a variety of manipulations of one or more image signals, including preprocessing steps such as detection of the relevant regions of the detected image, processing to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, and analysis of the image to determine values of selected image quality metrics. While the full range of image processing tasks may be performed by the image analyzer in some embodiments, in other embodiments, selected pre-processing steps may be performed by appropriately configured image detector(s).
Depending on the position and configuration of the image detector(s), the detected image may include portions (e.g., of the subject's eye and face) that are not of interest. Therefore, image preprocessing may include selecting for further analysis only those portions of the detected image that are of interest, e.g. the retina, or more particularly the fovea. Selection of areas of interest may be based on light intensity thresholding (to remove areas of the image outside the pupil of the eye), or feature detection. The position of the fovea in the image may be tracked in some embodiments. Landmarks that may be used to detect and track selected portions of the retina, and particularly the fovea, include the optic nerve and certain blood vessels. Such techniques are well known to those of skill in the art of retinal imaging.
Image manipulations to improve the signal to noise ratio or otherwise make the detected image easier or more convenient to work with may include a variety of conventional image processing techniques, such as filtering, noise reduction, adjusting offset and scaling, contrast enhancement, spatial “cropping”, spectral (color) selectivity, selection of at least portion of a detected image for further analysis, or various mathematical transformations, such techniques being known to those with skill in the art.
After preliminary image processing steps have been completed, the processed image is analyzed to obtain one or more measures of image quality. The term “image quality” as used herein, means any of various parameters, also referred to as “image quality attributes” or “image quality metrics” or “image metrics” that may be used to characterize the image or a portion of the image, particularly with regard to meaningful or useful content. The term “quality” is not intended to imply “good quality” or “high quality” but rather quality in general, whether good, bad or mediocre.
Image sharpness, or fineness-of-focus (i.e. sharpness or ‘crispness’ of focus), is an important measure of image quality. Image focus may be broken down into a number of components thereof, such as spherical focus or cylindrical focus (with an associated axis of orientation). Choice of quality metric in certain embodiments may be matched to the attributes of the optical aberrations that can be corrected by the adjustable lens system or optical system. In some cases, detecting (and subsequently correcting) only one focal attribute may be performed. In other cases, multiple focus attributes may be detected and corrected.
Image sharpness or focus is not the only measure of image quality. Depending on the intended application of the system, other image attributes or quality metrics may be considered of greater interest or importance. These may include metrics such as for, example, image contrast or intensity.
Image quality may be assessed from the entire selected image (meaning the entire retina image or a selected region of the retina, for example, the fovea), or it may be assessed from selected features of the image, e.g. the optic nerve or a blood vessel. One method that may be used for assessing the image as a whole is to perform a frequency domain analysis of the image. The human visual system is particularly tuned to and responsive to edges and areas of high contrast. Frequency domain analysis of an image reveals that the amplitude of high spatial frequency components is relatively higher in such areas. An in-focus image will generally have a relatively higher frequency composition than an out-of-focus image, and therefore, spatial frequency content may also serve as an indicator of image focus. Therefore, the amplitude of selected high spatial frequency components could be used as a metric of image quality. The peak spatial frequency content may be of particular value. Frequency compositions may be determined, for example, by using a FFT (Fast Fourier Transform). The Fourier transform is only one example of a variety of well-known transformation methods that may be used for performing a frequency domain analysis of an image signal, and that may provide useful measures of image quality suitable for use in the practice of the methods and systems described herein.
As an alternative to (or in addition to) performing a frequency analysis of an image or portion of an image, image analysis may include a preliminary step of feature identification followed by a calculation of the degree of sharpness (or “focus”) of that feature. For example, the feature may be an edge or a light-dark transition, and the sharpness may be quantified by the amplitude of the light-dark transition, for example. Various other detectable features and measures of feature sharpness are known in the art of image processing.
In embodiments of the inventive system in which only the output (reflected) image is detected, image quality is determined self referentially; since the visual input is not known, it is assumed that certain features of the visual input (e.g. lines, edges) have predictable characteristics. Deviations from the expected characteristics in the reflected image may indicate an out-of-focus retinal image, and the need for adjustment of the adjustable lens system to compensate for aberrations in the eye optics. In embodiments in which both input (incident) and output (reflected) images are detected, the difference between the input and output image provides further information regarding the characteristics of the eye optics and need for adjustable lens system adjustment. The reflected image can be compared to a reference image other than the input image. It is sufficient that the reflected image and reference image be detected at different locations in the visual train, such that the difference in the two images is caused by the eye lens (and/or other components of the eye optical system for which correction is sought). Determination of the difference between the reflected image and the reference image may be determined by calculating a difference signal and then computing one or more image quality attributes for the difference signal, or by determining one or more image quality attributes for each of the reflected and reference image, and comparing the image quality attributes for the two images.
In some cases, information derived from the output image alone, or the combination of the input (reference) and output image, will be sufficient to determine the necessary adjustment of the adjustable lens system. In other cases, analysis of the available images may not be sufficient to determine the optimal direction and magnitude of lens system adjustment. In such cases, an adaptive algorithm for lens system adjustment may be used, in which the lens system is adjusted and the quality of the retinal image before and after the lens system adjustment is compared. In this case, the reference image may be a previous instance of the time varying image detected from the retina or fovea. As discussed previously, comparison of current and previous (reference) images can be based on determination of image quality or focus attributes for the difference signal, or comparison of image quality or focus attributes for the two signals. The direction and magnitude of lens system adjustment steps may then be modified based upon the result of the previous adjustment. First and second time varying images can thus occur at different “locations” in at least one of space, time, or spectral position.
Processor 34 may utilize image analyzer 54 to process signal data from detector 32 to generate a transfer function for the current state of the optical system of eye 10, and then utilize lens controller 58 to modify the transfer function of adjustable lens system 26 by sending an appropriate control signal to adjustable lens system 26 such that the eye optical system and adjustable lens system together cause a desired representation of the external visual world to be formed on the retina. In most cases, but not all, a clear, in-focus, image on the retina is desired; however, in some cases adjustable lens system 26 may be controlled to modify the retinal image in some particular way relative to the external visual world. Such modification may include changes in magnification (beyond the normal change in modification produced by the optical system of eye 10), changes in spectral content, and changes in focal length.
FIG. 10 breaks down into greater detail an exemplary lens control process as it may be performed by lens controller 58 (in other words, the process performed at step 86 in FIG. 4, step 100 in FIG. 5, step 128 in FIG. 7, and step 154 in FIG. 9). At step 166, processor 34 receives image quality signal 60. At step 168, processor 34 receives lens state signal 68. At step 170, processor 34 receives magnification factor input 140, which may be a stored value. Steps 166, 168, and 170 may be performed in any desired order; moreover, in some applications certain of the received parameters may not be adjusted, so the parameter value may be a stored constant value, or the step of receiving a magnification factor value may be omitted entirely. Subsequently, processor 34 (specifically lens controller 58) determines a spherical lens strength adjustment at step 172, determines a cylindrical lens strength adjustment at step 174, determines a cylindrical axis orientation adjustment at step 176, and determines a magnification adjustment at step 178. Steps 172, 174, and 176 may be performed in other orders than depicted in FIG. 10; if one or more of the parameters are not adjusted, one or more of steps 172, 174, and 176 may be omitted as appropriate. At step 180, lens controller 58 generates a lens control signal based upon the adjustments determined in steps 172, 174, and 176. Depending on the nature of the adjustable lens system and lens actuation scheme, the control signal may reflect newly determined absolute settings for the adjustable lens system, or the control signal may reflect changes to lens system settings relative to the current lens system settings. Adjustable lens system settings may be adjusted to modify various measures of image quality, including image sharpness or focus, image spatial frequency content, or any other selected image metric or image quality attribute. Modification of the adjustable lens system settings may be selected to move one or more image metrics or quality attributes toward a specific target value, in a desired direction, or simply to produce a change in the image metric or quality attribute which may be used as a reference value in an adaptive control algorithm. Determination of lens system adjustment may be performed using known principles of control system design. For example, an exemplary method for adjusting a lens system in response to the quality of a detected image may include determining an adjustment direction in response to the determined spatial frequency content and then adjusting the lens system in the determined adjustment direction. Determining the adjustment direction may include determining a change in the sharpness caused by adjusting the lens system in the determined adjustment direction by determining the sharpness of a previous instance of the image, and determining further change to the lens system adjustment based on the result of the previous adjustment. For example, if the previous adjustment produced a reduction in image sharpness, the direction of lens system adjustment may be reversed. Conversely, if the adjustment increased image sharpness, the next adjustment step may be in the same direction. Various lens system parameters (spherical focus, cylindrical focus, etc.) may be adjusted independently, and the determination of adjustment of each lens system parameter may be responsive to different image quality attributes. In some embodiments, image quality may be measured in a selected region of the image (e.g., the fovea) and a lens system adjustment selected to optimize the foveal image applied to the entire lens, thus modifying the focus over the entire retina. In other embodiments, the focus may be adjusted separately for areas of the adjustable lens projecting onto different regions of the retina. These and other approaches for controlling lens system adjustments may be performed by an appropriately configured or programmed lens controller, and may involve the controlled use of a lens system having other than purely spherical or cylindrical focusing capabilities.
The lens controller may control a variety or lens system or optical system parameters, including any or all of transmissivity of the lens system over one or more spectral wavebands, intensity of light generated by an optical system, effective aperture of one or more components of the adjustable lens or optical system, transverse position of at least one optical element relative to the optical axis of the eye, or one or more chromatic aberration correcting features of the adjustable lens system.
Timing is an important consideration in the operation of many embodiments. In order to provide ongoing adaptive visual modification, correction or enhancement, the system updates the setting of the adjustable lens system in real-time or near-real-time. Moreover, in order to provide true adaptive vision correction, the focus of the adjustable lens system is adjusted to compensate for the current state of the eye optics and for the current visual input, without a priori knowledge of the visual input. In some cases this may be accomplished by completing a full update cycle (i.e., the flow process loop depicted in FIG. 4, 5, 7, or 9) in an amount of time less than or equal to the intrinsic accommodation time of lens of eye. The intrinsic accommodation time of the lens of the eye (i.e., that amount of time that it takes for the lens to adjust to a change in the distance to a visual target) is from about 2 to about 3 seconds for a large change in focal distance, and varies from subject to subject. Accommodation rates and accommodation range vary as functions of age and health, being higher for children and lower for older adults. By adjusting the lens system faster than the intrinsic accommodation time, the lens-actuating musculature of the eye will be minimally worked, thus reducing eye strain and/or fatigue of eye muscles.
In some use-cases it may be desirable to update the setting of the adjustable lens system at a rate that is as fast, or faster, than the visual pigment reversal rate of photoreceptors of eye. In particular, in some embodiments, it may be desirable to update the lens setting at a rate faster than that of the photoreceptors having the fastest visual pigment reversal rate. In some embodiments, a controller is configured to provide closed loop control of the adjustable lens system on an ongoing basis. In some embodiments, the lens controller is configured to adjust the adjustable lens system at a rate faster than the intrinsic accommodation time of the lens of the eye. In other embodiments, the lens controller is configured to adjust the adjustable lens system at a rate faster than the visual pigment reversal rate of the photoreceptors of the eye.
It is thought that lens system adjustment update rates of at least about once every three seconds (⅓ Hz) may improve usefulness in general applications, and that update rates of about 1 Hz will be preferable for general applications. In higher-performance applications, update rates of about 3 Hz may be desirable. Update rates higher than 10 Hz may not provide additional benefit in some applications, due to the speed limitations inherent in other parts of the human visual system, though in some applications, this may not be the case. Thus, it is thought that update rates in the range of about ⅓ to about 10 Hz will be useful in practice, and that update rates in the range of about 1 to about 10 Hz will be more preferred, and that rates in the range of about 1 to about 3 Hz will be most preferred.
Timing of the update rate for lens system adjustment may be controlled in a number of ways. For example, each update cycle may be initialized by a signal from a timer chip or system clock; a software loop with an approximately fixed cycle time may also control the timing. The design of systems using these and other timing control methods are well known to those of skill in the art.
In some cases, in order to provide for rapid adjustment between one lens setting and at least one other lens setting, rather than utilizing a single adjustable lens system and modifying the setting of that lens system, two or more adjustable lenses, lens systems or optical systems may be used, and suitable optics used to switch between the two or more lenses, lens systems, or optical systems. In the exemplary case of two lens subsystems, one useful application of this embodiment is to adjust the first and second optical subsystems to provide correction for near and far vision, respectively. Thus, switching between the two optical subsystems, the subject would obtain correction similar to what is currently provided by bi-focal lenses, but in an automated fashion.
This approach is depicted schematically in FIG. 11. First optical subsystem 183 and second optical subsystem 184 have optical properties (e.g. spherical focal length, cylindrical focal power, and axis of orientation) that can be adjusted independently. First optical subsystem 183 and second optical subsystem 184 are set up in parallel between a visual target 40 and the eye of the subject. Input image 40 a may be switched rapidly between optical subsystem 183 and optical subsystem 184 by switching element 185, which may be an adjustable reflector, or refractive element, such as a lens. Each of optical subsystem 183 and optical subsystem 184 may be an adjustable lens or lens system, controlled by a lens controller as described previously. After passing through either optical subsystem 183 or optical subsystem 184, an intermediate incident image 40 d or 40 e, respectively, will be delivered to the eye of the subject. The optical system as depicted in FIG. 11 may be used in connection with image detection and lens control mechanisms as described previously herein.
Another method for providing rapid switching between optical subsystems having different settings is to provide two or more optical subsystems having transmissivities controllable between substantially complete transmissivity and substantially zero transmissivity, such that the amount of light that is transmitted through each subsystem can be controlled. Parallel subsystems are maintained in the optical path between the eye and the visual target; by adjusting the controllable transmissivities of respective parallel subsystems appropriately, it is possible to switch rapidly between multiple subsystems. Parallel optical subsystems of this type may be constructed in the form of an electroactive lens in which individually controllable lens areas are interleaved, as illustrated in FIG. 12, by microfabrication techniques known to those of skill in the relevant art. Thus, lens regions 186 correspond to a first optical subsystem, while lens regions 187 correspond to a second optical subsystem; adjustment of the transmissivities of lens regions 186 to provide substantially full transmissivity while adjusting the transmissivities of lens regions 187 to substantially zero transmissivity thus routes the visual input through the first optical subsystem. Conversely, adjustment of the transmissivities of lens regions 186 to provide substantially zero transmissivity while adjusting the transmissivities of lens regions 187 to substantially full transmissivity routes the visual input through the second optical subsystem. Different interleaving patterns can support three or more different optical subsystems.
Switching between first and second or more optical subsystems according to either of the above described methods could be controlled manually by the subject, by pushing a button or intentionally generating a readily detected control signal (a blink, etc.) or controlled automatically in response to vergence movement of eyes, change in distance to the visual target (detected, for example, by a rangefinder, which may be operable to provide an indication of a distance to a visual target so that the controller activates the switching mechanism responsive to the indication of distance to the visual target), or a sufficiently large change in focal quality of the detected image. According to either of the above embodiments, one or more of the optical subsystems may be adjusted to the current state of the visual input and the eye optics of the subject in order to compensate for gradual changes in focal quality, while switching between the subsystems may be used to compensate for more abrupt changes (for example, when the subject switches abruptly from a near vision task, such as reading the dashboard display of a car, to a distance vision task, such as looking at the road ahead).
Various components of the system, including the adjustable lens system, processor, and input and output image detectors may require some form of power supply. While the invention is not limited to any particular type of power supply, if the power supply is to be included in an eyeglass frame, contact lens, or intraocular lens device, it will typically be small and lightweight. For embodiments in which the adjustable lens system is mounted in an eyeglass frame, the device may be conveniently powered by a battery. Photovoltaic cells may also be used to provide power to the device. The power supply and possibly other components of the device as well may be located at a distance from the adjustable lens system, and power transmitted to the device, e.g. by inductive coupling or power-beaming. The power supply may include an inductive coil or antenna.
In some embodiments, the body of the subject may be used as a power source for powering the device. Various “energy scavenging” or “energy harvesting” devices are known, or may be developed (see e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,615,074, 6,655,035 and 6,768,246, and published U.S. Patent applications 20030014091 and 20030165648, all of which are incorporated herein by reference). For example, devices that capture energy from body movement of the subject (e.g., inertial devices as are used to power self-winding wristwatches) may be used to power the device. Pressure and chemical gradients within the body may also provide energy for powering operation of the device. For example, energy may be captured from the systolic-diastolic cycle or pulsatile blood flow of subject, through a micro-turbine or powered shunt placed in the respired airflow of the subject. Energy scavenging devices may scavenge energy from the environment, as well. Although reference has been made to a single power supply, the invention is not limited to use of a single power supply, and in some embodiments separate power supplies may be used for different part of the system, during different circumstances of operation, or both. Various components of the system may have different power sources, and the system as a whole may have one or multiple power sources of various types and is not limited to any specific power source configuration.
Adjustable lens system 26, output image detector 32, and input image detector 35 (if used) are positioned with respect to eye 10 of the subject 28 via mounting 30. Mounting 30 may take various forms, examples of which are illustrated in FIGS. 13 and 14. Mounting 30 may be an eyeglass frame, as depicted previously in FIG. 2, or helmet mounted frame 190, as in FIG. 13. Helmet 192 may be of the type worn by an airplane pilot, for example. Alternatively, mounting 30 may include a mechanical linkage 194 secured to a wall or ceiling or mounted on a base set on a table or floor, such that, in use, the subject stands or sits, and the equipment is held in fixed relationship to the subject's eye, but is not attached directly to the subject's head. As with the embodiments of the system in which mounting 30 is an eyeglass frame, other components of the system may be mounted on the mounting, or may be packaged separately.
The adjustable lens system may be implemented in the form of an eyeglass lens, a contact lens, or intraocular lens device. The adjustable lens system (or at least a portion thereof) may be formed in, on, or in spatial association with such lenses, including placement behind or in front of such lenses, in addition to being housed in or formed integrally with such lenses. It may also be implemented in other forms; as depicted in FIGS. 13 and 14 it may be mounted in a helmet or in a stationary mount of the type used for optometric devices. The latter implementations are bulkier and present greater flexibility with regard to choice of system components and integration thereof. Although a helmet is depicted in FIG. 13, it will be appreciated that optical system components may be positioned with respect to the head by a variety of head mounted devices or structures, including headbands, hats, and other head coverings, which may not only provide support to system components but also function as head apparel or adornment. For implementation of the system as eyeglasses, and more particularly in the form of a contact lens or intraocular lens device, system components that are to be located in or on the lens (e.g., the lens actuator and image detector(s)) will preferably be very small, light weight and of modest time-averaged power demand. Certain components of the system may be packaged separately from the adjustable lens system, thereby reducing size and weight constraints. For example, certain components of the system can be packaged in a case that can be carried in, for example, the subject's pocket. Wireless transmission of data, control and power signals may be achieved via RF transmission or inductive coupling or beaming. Various portions of the system may also include transmission and receiving devices to provide for sending signals between physically separated system components. Digital signals are thought to be particularly suited for effectively error-free transmission in such embodiments, but the practice of the methods herein are not limited to any particular method of data transmission. For eyeglass, helmet, or stationary mount devices, wiring may be satisfactory for carrying power, data and control signals.
In a further alternative embodiment, illustrated in FIG. 15, the adjustable lens system is constructed in the form of a contact lens 200 that is worn on the cornea 202 of eye 10. Output image detector 32, optional light source 33 (if used) and input image detector 35 may be attached to or manufactured integrally with the contact lens 200, so that they may be positioned appropriately with respect to the eye of the subject. Small size, low weight, and biocompatibility are important characteristics of components of this device. Other components of the system, including image analyzer 56, lens controller 58, and power supply 36 may be packaged separately in a remote device 500 at a remote location, and power and data signals 501 transmitted to the contact lens 200 inductively or via other suitable mechanisms, as depicted in FIG. 15; alternatively, additional components may be mounted on or manufactured integrally with contact lens 200. The term ‘remote location’, as used herein, refers to any location not in direct physical contact with contact lens 200, including positions relatively close to the contact lens on the body of the subject, more distant locations on the body of the subject, or locations separated from and at a distance from the body of the subject.
Some embodiments of the systems and devices described herein may also be configured as an intraocular lens device 206, as depicted in FIG. 16. Intraocular lens device 206 includes lens system 209 and output image detector 32. Other components of the system, including image analyzer 56, lens controller 58, and power supply 36 may be packaged separately in a remote device (not shown) of the type used in the embodiment of FIG. 15. An optional light source may be mounted in intraocular lens device 206 (not shown in FIG. 16). For the embodiment of FIG. 16, the functional flow diagram will be as illustrated in schematic form in FIG. 17. Input image 40 a passes through eye optics 208, through adjustable lens system 209 and to retina 16. Intraocular lens device 206 may also include output image detector 32. In an intact eye, the eye optics include the cornea and lens. In the implementation of the system or device as an intraocular lens device, it is anticipated that the natural lens will have been removed and the adjustable intraocular lens device implanted within the eye. Various adjustable intraoculuar lens designs may be used in this embodiment, as exemplified by U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,373,218, 4,564,267, 4,601,545, 4,787,903, and 5,108,429, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The eye optics will then include the cornea. However, in some cases the intraocular lens device may be implanted either in front of or behind the natural lens, so that the eye optics may include the natural lens as well as the cornea. The intraocular version is not restricted to use with any particular combination of eye optics, though the correction provided by the lens system optics will typically take into account the degree of focus provided by the eye optics.
Referring back to FIG. 17, retinal image 210 is reflected from retina 16 as intermediate reflected image 210 a, and arrives at output image detector 32 as reflected image 212. Output image detector 32 creates a representation of reflected image 212 as a digital output image signal 52 which is transmitted to image analyzer 56. Output image signal 52 is processed by image analyzer 56 to determine whether and how lens system 209 should be adjusted to improve the quality of the retinal image. Sharpness signal 60 is generated by image analyzer 56 and sent to lens controller 58. Lens controller 58 generates lens control signal 62. Lens controller 58 may also receive as input a lens state signal 68 that provides information regarding the current state of adjustable lens 206. Adjustable lens system 209, lens controller 58, output image detector 32, and image analyzer 56 are powered by power supply 36. As in the previous embodiment, adjustable lens system 209, and output image detector 32, are attached to or manufactured integrally with intraocular lens device 206. Size, weight, and biocompatibility requirements may be stringent for these components of the system. Other components of the system, including image analyzer 56, lens controller 58, and power supply 36 may be packaged separately at a remote location and power and data signals transmitted to intraocular device 206, or in some cases they may be mounted on or manufactured integrally with intraocular device 206. As noted previously, the term ‘remote location’, as used herein, refers to any location not in direct physical contact with the intraocular lens device, and may include positions relatively close to the contact lens in or on the body of the subject, as well as more distant locations not on the body of the subject. Operation of the device configured as an intraocular lens device, as illustrated in FIG. 17, is substantially the same as that of other, previously described embodiments, for example, as illustrated in the flow diagram of FIG. 4 or 5.
With regard to the hardware and/or software used in image detection and analysis, as well as various aspects of device control, those having skill in the art will recognize that the state of the art has progressed to the point where there is little distinction left between hardware and software implementations of aspects of systems; the use of hardware or software is generally (but not always, in that in certain contexts the choice between hardware and software can become significant) a design choice representing cost vs. efficiency or implementation convenience tradeoffs. Those having skill in the art will appreciate that there are various vehicles by which processes and/or systems described herein can be effected (e.g., hardware, software, and/or firmware), and that the preferred vehicle will vary with the context in which the processes are deployed. For example, if an implementer determines that speed and accuracy are paramount, the implementer may opt for a hardware and/or firmware vehicle; alternatively, if flexibility is paramount, the implementer may opt for a solely software implementation; or, yet again alternatively, the implementer may opt for some combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. Hence, there are several possible vehicles by which the processes described herein may be effected, none of which is inherently superior to the other in that any vehicle to be utilized is a choice dependent upon the context in which the vehicle will be deployed and the specific concerns (e.g., speed, flexibility, or predictability) of the implementer, any of which may vary. Those skilled in the art will recognize that optical aspects of implementations will require optically-oriented hardware, software, and or firmware.
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be implicitly understood by those with skill in the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one embodiment, several portions of the subject matter subject matter described herein may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), digital signal processors (DSPs), or other integrated formats. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that some aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in standard integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and/or firmware would be well within the capabilities of one of skill in the art in light of this disclosure. In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that certain mechanisms of the subject matter described herein are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative embodiment of the subject matter described herein applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing media used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of a signal bearing media include, but are not limited to, the following: recordable type media such as floppy disks, hard disk drives, CD ROMs, digital tape, and computer memory; and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links using TDM or IP based communication links (e.g., links carrying packetized data).
In a general sense, those skilled in the art will recognize that the various aspects described herein which can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof can be viewed as being composed of various types of “electrical circuitry.” Consequently, as used herein “electrical circuitry” includes, but is not limited to, electrical circuitry having at least one discrete electrical circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one integrated circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one application specific integrated circuit, electrical circuitry forming a general purpose computing device configured by a computer program (e.g., a general purpose computer configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein, or a microprocessor configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein), electrical circuitry forming a memory device (e.g., forms of random access memory), and/or electrical circuitry forming a communications device (e.g., a modem, communications switch, or optical-electrical equipment).
Those skilled in the art will recognize that it is common within the art to describe devices for image detection and analysis, optical system control, and/or processes in the fashion set forth herein, and thereafter use standard engineering practices to integrate such described devices and/or processes into vision enhancement systems as exemplified herein. That is, at least a portion of the devices and/or processes described herein can be integrated into a vision enhancement system via a reasonable amount of experimentation. Those having skill in the art will recognize that such systems generally include one or more of a memory such as volatile and non-volatile memory, processors such as microprocessors and digital signal processors, computational-supporting or -associated entities such as operating systems, user interfaces, drivers, sensors, actuators, applications programs, one or more interaction devices, such as data ports, control systems including feedback loops and control implementing actuators (e.g., devices for sensing position and/or velocity and/or acceleration or time-rate-of-change thereof, control motors for moving and/or adjusting components and/or quantities). A typical vision enhancement system may be implemented utilizing any suitable available components, such as those typically found in appropriate computing/communication systems, combined with standard engineering practices.
The foregoing-described aspects depict different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermediate components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected”, or “operably coupled”, to each other to achieve the desired functionality.
While particular aspects of the present subject matter described herein have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that, based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be made without departing from this subject matter described herein and its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scope of this subject matter described herein. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the invention is defined by the appended claims. It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should NOT be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to inventions containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” and/or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense of one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense of one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together).
Although the methods, devices, systems and approaches herein have been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments are possible. As illustrated by the foregoing examples, various choices of adjustable lens system configuration and image detector configuration may be within the scope of the invention. As has been discussed, the choice of system configuration may depend on the intended application of the system, the environment in which the system is used, cost, personal preference or other factors. Image analysis and lens control processes may be modified to take into account choices of lens system and image detector configuration, and such modifications, as known to those of skill in the arts of image analysis, control system design, and other relevant arts, may fall within the scope of the invention. Therefore, the full spirit or scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims and is not be limited to the specific embodiments described herein.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3161718||Jul 12, 1961||Dec 15, 1964||United Res & Dev Corp||Variable power fluid lens|
|US3245315||Sep 5, 1962||Apr 12, 1966||Alvin M Marks||Electro-optic responsive flashblindness controlling device|
|US3507988||Sep 15, 1966||Apr 21, 1970||Cornell Aeronautical Labor Inc||Narrow-band,single-observer,television apparatus|
|US3614215||Apr 23, 1970||Oct 19, 1971||Leo Mackta||Fluid bifocal spectacle|
|US3738734||Feb 23, 1972||Jun 12, 1973||T Reider||Optical fluid lens construction|
|US3819256||Aug 11, 1972||Jun 25, 1974||Bellows J||Apparatus for refracting the eye|
|US4168882||Jan 4, 1978||Sep 25, 1979||The Secretary Of State For Social Services In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland||Optical systems|
|US4174156||Oct 31, 1977||Nov 13, 1979||Gilbert Glorieux||Optical lens for differential correction|
|US4181408||Dec 5, 1977||Jan 1, 1980||Senders John W||Vision compensation|
|US4190330||Dec 27, 1977||Feb 26, 1980||Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated||Variable focus liquid crystal lens system|
|US4255023||Feb 12, 1979||Mar 10, 1981||House Harold D||Objective retinal response recorder|
|US4261655||Jan 9, 1978||Apr 14, 1981||Honigsbaum Richard F||Biomechanically focused eyeglasses|
|US4264154||Jul 23, 1979||Apr 28, 1981||Polaroid Corporation||Apparatus for automatically controlling transmission of light through a lens system|
|US4279474||Mar 25, 1980||Jul 21, 1981||Belgorod Barry M||Spectacle lens having continuously variable controlled density and fast response time|
|US4300818||Mar 13, 1978||Nov 17, 1981||Schachar Ronald A||Multifocal ophthalmic lens|
|US4373218||Nov 17, 1980||Feb 15, 1983||Schachar Ronald A||Variable power intraocular lens and method of implanting into the posterior chamber|
|US4395736||Jul 17, 1981||Jul 26, 1983||Thomson - Csf||Solid state image pickup|
|US4403840||Mar 9, 1981||Sep 13, 1983||Okun Milton R||Variable focus eyeglasses|
|US4418990||Jul 20, 1981||Dec 6, 1983||Gerber Scientific, Inc.||Eyeglasses and other lenses of variable focal length and means and method for varying such focal length|
|US4429959||Nov 9, 1981||Feb 7, 1984||Samuel Walters||Spectacle mounted hinged monocular or binocular vision aid|
|US4444471||Mar 12, 1982||Apr 24, 1984||Polaroid Corporation||Variable focus lens system employing elastomeric lens|
|US4466705||Sep 30, 1982||Aug 21, 1984||Michelson Paul E||Fluid lens|
|US4466706||Mar 10, 1982||Aug 21, 1984||Lamothe Ii Frederick H||Optical fluid lens|
|US4500180||Jul 22, 1981||Feb 19, 1985||Bausch & Lomb Incorporated||In an ophthalmic instrument|
|US4564267||Dec 27, 1982||Jan 14, 1986||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Variable-focal-length lens|
|US4572616||Aug 10, 1982||Feb 25, 1986||Syracuse University||Adaptive liquid crystal lens|
|US4601545||May 16, 1984||Jul 22, 1986||Kern Seymour P||Variable power lens system|
|US4609824||Nov 9, 1984||Sep 2, 1986||Thomson-Csf||Photosensitive device for the infrared range|
|US4697598||Apr 25, 1985||Oct 6, 1987||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Evoked potential autorefractometry system|
|US4709996||Aug 10, 1984||Dec 1, 1987||Michelson Paul E||Fluid lens|
|US4756605||Jan 21, 1986||Jul 12, 1988||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Liquid crystal spectacles|
|US4772094||Feb 5, 1985||Sep 20, 1988||Bright And Morning Star||Optical stereoscopic system and prism window|
|US4787903||Jul 24, 1985||Nov 29, 1988||Grendahl Dennis T||Intraocular lens|
|US4795248||Aug 27, 1985||Jan 3, 1989||Olympus Optical Company Ltd.||Liquid crystal eyeglass|
|US4818095||Jan 4, 1985||Apr 4, 1989||Kunio Takeuchi||Special lens and glasses equipped with the same|
|US4836652||Nov 13, 1987||Jun 6, 1989||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Liquid crystal shutter array having microlenses corresponding to the pixel electrodes|
|US4842601||May 18, 1987||Jun 27, 1989||Smith S Gregory||Accommodating intraocular lens and method of implanting and using same|
|US4844086||Apr 13, 1987||Jul 4, 1989||The Children's Medical Center Corporation||Cross correlation analysis in brain electrical activity mapping|
|US4904063||May 27, 1988||Feb 27, 1990||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Liquid crystal lenses having a Fresnel lens|
|US4907860||Mar 3, 1988||Mar 13, 1990||Noble Lowell A||Three dimensional viewing glasses|
|US4919520||Nov 18, 1988||Apr 24, 1990||Olympus Optical Company||Liquid crystal eyeglass|
|US4927241||Sep 25, 1989||May 22, 1990||U.S. Philips Corp.||Optical imaging system having an electronically variable focal length and optical image sensor provided with such a system|
|US4945242||Feb 22, 1989||Jul 31, 1990||Thomson-Csf||Photosensitive device and image detector including such a device, especially two-energy image detector|
|US4952788||Oct 6, 1989||Aug 28, 1990||Thomson-Csf||Method of photoelectric detection with reduction of remanence of a phototransistor, notably of the NIPIN type|
|US4953968||Mar 22, 1989||Sep 4, 1990||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Automated visual assessment system with steady visual evoked potential stimulator and product detector|
|US4955389||Jul 22, 1988||Sep 11, 1990||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Apparatus for stimulation with optical stimuli|
|US4961639||Jun 30, 1989||Oct 9, 1990||Lazarus Stuart M||Prism section lens spectacles|
|US4968127||Nov 30, 1989||Nov 6, 1990||Russell James P||Controllable, variable transmissivity eyewear|
|US4974602||Aug 15, 1989||Dec 4, 1990||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Arrangement for analyzing local bioelectric currents in biological tissue complexes|
|US4981342||Aug 1, 1988||Jan 1, 1991||Allergan Inc.||Multifocal birefringent lens system|
|US4991951||Mar 29, 1990||Feb 12, 1991||Nikon Corporation||Eyeglass frame for electrooptical lenses|
|US5015086||Apr 16, 1990||May 14, 1991||Seiko Epson Corporation||Electronic sunglasses|
|US5020538||Nov 14, 1989||Jun 4, 1991||Sam Technology, Inc.||Low noise magnetoencephalogram system and method|
|US5052401||Mar 22, 1989||Oct 1, 1991||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Product detector for a steady visual evoked potential stimulator and product detector|
|US5066301||Oct 9, 1990||Nov 19, 1991||Wiley Robert G||Variable focus lens|
|US5073021||Mar 17, 1989||Dec 17, 1991||Environmental Research Institute Of Michigan||Bifocal ophthalmic lens constructed from birefringent material|
|US5076665||Dec 13, 1989||Dec 31, 1991||Robert C. Mardian, Jr.||Computer screen monitor optic relief device|
|US5091801||Oct 19, 1989||Feb 25, 1992||North East Research Associates, Inc.||Method and apparatus for adjusting the focal length of a optical system|
|US5108169||Feb 22, 1991||Apr 28, 1992||Mandell Robert B||Contact lens bifocal with switch|
|US5108429||Mar 11, 1991||Apr 28, 1992||Wiley Robert G||Micromotor actuated adjustable focus lens|
|US5142411||Mar 2, 1990||Aug 25, 1992||Werner J. Fiala||Multifocal birefringent lens system|
|US5171266||Sep 4, 1990||Dec 15, 1992||Wiley Robert G||Variable power intraocular lens with astigmatism correction|
|US5182585||Sep 26, 1991||Jan 26, 1993||The Arizona Carbon Foil Company, Inc.||Eyeglasses with controllable refracting power|
|US5184156||Nov 12, 1991||Feb 2, 1993||Reliant Laser Corporation||Glasses with color-switchable, multi-layered lenses|
|US5187672||Jan 22, 1991||Feb 16, 1993||Nim Incorporated||Phase modulation spectroscopic system|
|US5203788||Mar 14, 1991||Apr 20, 1993||Wiley Robert G||Micromotor actuated adjustable focus lens|
|US5208688||Feb 8, 1991||May 4, 1993||Osd Envizion Company||Light transmission control device|
|US5229885||Sep 3, 1991||Jul 20, 1993||Quaglia Lawrence D||Infinitely variable focal power lens units precisely matched to varying distances by radar and electronics|
|US5239412||Feb 4, 1991||Aug 24, 1993||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Solid image pickup device having microlenses|
|US5306926||Feb 12, 1992||Apr 26, 1994||Sony Corporation||CCD solid state imager|
|US5309095||Dec 13, 1991||May 3, 1994||Neuromag Oy||Compact magnetometer probe and an array of them covering the whole human skull for measurement of magnetic fields arising from the activity of the brain|
|US5323777||Oct 28, 1991||Jun 28, 1994||Neuromag Oy||Sensor position indicator coils to be used in magnetoencephalographic experiemnts and a means of attaching them to the head|
|US5324930||Apr 8, 1993||Jun 28, 1994||Eastman Kodak Company||Lens array for photodiode device with an aperture having a lens region and a non-lens region|
|US5329322||May 26, 1992||Jul 12, 1994||Yancey Don R||Palm size autorefractor and fundus topographical mapping instrument|
|US5351100||Dec 9, 1992||Sep 27, 1994||Bmc Industries, Inc.||Glass multifocal ophthalmic lens with polarizing element and method of making|
|US5352886||Mar 30, 1993||Oct 4, 1994||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force||Micro non-imaging light concentrators for image sensors with a lenslet array|
|US5359444||Dec 24, 1992||Oct 25, 1994||Motorola, Inc.||Auto-focusing optical apparatus|
|US5382986||Nov 4, 1992||Jan 17, 1995||Reliant Laser Corporation||Liquid-crystal sunglasses indicating overexposure to UV-radiation|
|US5440357||Jul 20, 1993||Aug 8, 1995||Lawrence D. Quaglia||Vari-lens phoropter and automatic fast focusing infinitely variable focal power lens units precisely matched to varying distances by radar and electronics|
|US5443506||Nov 18, 1992||Aug 22, 1995||Garabet; Antoine L.||Lens with variable optical properties|
|US5451766||Jul 11, 1994||Sep 19, 1995||U.S. Philips Corporation||Imaging device containing an electrooptic material to adjust the effective focal length of a lens element|
|US5488439||Jun 14, 1995||Jan 30, 1996||Weltmann; Alfred||Lens holder system for eyeglass frame selection|
|US5491583||Jun 17, 1994||Feb 13, 1996||Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.||Infrared lens systems|
|US5526067||Dec 21, 1994||Jun 11, 1996||Polaroid Corporation||Actuation mechanism for variable focal length eyeglasses|
|US5627674||Jun 17, 1994||May 6, 1997||Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.||Ultraviolet lens systems including liquid lens elements|
|US5629747||Dec 4, 1995||May 13, 1997||Nikon Corporation||Hand-held ophthalmological apparatus having a retractable forehead contact member|
|US5629790||Oct 18, 1993||May 13, 1997||Neukermans; Armand P.||Micromachined torsional scanner|
|US5644374||Mar 27, 1995||Jul 1, 1997||Seiko Epson Corporation||Variable focus type eyesight correcting apparatus|
|US5654786||Jan 11, 1996||Aug 5, 1997||Robert C. Burlingame||Optical lens structure and control system for maintaining a selected constant level of transmitted light at a wearer's eyes|
|US5655534||Nov 30, 1993||Aug 12, 1997||Ilmoniemi; Risto||Method and apparatus for separating the different components of evoked response and spontaneous activity brain signals as well as of signals measured from the heart|
|US5684637||Jul 19, 1995||Nov 4, 1997||Floyd; Johnnie E.||Fluid filled and pressurized lens with flexible optical boundary having variable focal length|
|US5687291||Jun 27, 1996||Nov 11, 1997||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Method and apparatus for estimating a cognitive decision made in response to a known stimulus from the corresponding single-event evoked cerebral potential|
|US5712721||Apr 7, 1994||Jan 27, 1998||Technology Partnership, Plc||Switchable lens|
|US5728155||Jan 22, 1996||Mar 17, 1998||Quantum Solutions, Inc.||Adjustable intraocular lens|
|US5739959||Aug 7, 1995||Apr 14, 1998||Lawrence D. Quaglia||Automatic fast focusing infinitely variable focal power lens units for eyeglasses and other optical instruments controlled by radar and electronics|
|US5748382||Jun 5, 1995||May 5, 1998||Maguire, Jr.; Francis J.||System for stretching a solid flexible lens|
|US5777719||Dec 23, 1996||Jul 7, 1998||University Of Rochester||Wavefront sensor for determining the wave aberration of the living eye|
|US5792051||Sep 6, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Non-Invasive Technology, Inc.||Optical probe for non-invasive monitoring of neural activity|
|US5815233||Oct 14, 1997||Sep 29, 1998||Citizen Watch Co., Ltd.||Optical device containing a liquid crystal element for changing optical characteristics of a lens element|
|US6752499 *||May 23, 2002||Jun 22, 2004||Thomas A. Aller||Myopia progression control using bifocal contact lenses|
|1||Carandini, Matteo; Heeger, David J.; Senn, Walter; "A Synaptic Explanation of Suppression in Visual Cortex"; The Journal of Neuroscience; bearing a date of Nov. 15, 2002; vol. 22.; pp. 10053-10065.|
|2||Center for Adaptive Opitcs: "How Does an Adaptive Optics System Work?"; bearing a date of 2002; pp. 1-2., located at: http://www.cfao.ucolick.org/ao/how.php , printed on Jul. 14, 2004.|
|3||Center for Adaptive Opitcs: "Other AO Primers"; bearing a date of 2002; pp. 1, located at http://www.cfaco.ucolick.org/ao/other.php , printed on Jul. 14, 2004.|
|4||Chance, Britton; Nioka, Shoko; Chen, Yu; "Shining New Light on Brain Function"; Spie's oemagazine; bearing a date of Jul. 2003; pp. 16-19 with 1 sheet of figures.|
|5||Croft, Mary Ann; Kaufman, Paul L.; Crawford, Kathryn S.; Neider, Michael W.; Glasser, Adrian; Bito, Laszlo Z.; "Accommodation dynamics in aging rhesus monkeys"; bearing a date of 1998; pp. 1885-1897.|
|6||Fantini, Sergio; Franceschini, Maria Angela; Gratton, Enrico; Hueber, Dennis; Rosenfeld, Warren; Maulik, Dev; Stubblefield, Phillip G.; Stankovic, Miljan R.; "Non-invasive optical mapping of the piglet brain in real time"; Optics Express; bearing dates of: Mar. 9, 1999; Apr. 7, 1999; Apr. 12, 1999; vol. 4, No. 8; pp. 308-314.|
|7||Fantini, Sergio; Heffer, Erica L.; Franceschini, Maria Angela; Gotz, Linda; Heinig, Anke; Heywang-Kobrunner, Sylvia; Schutz, Oliver; Siebold, Horst; "Optical Mammography with Intensity-Modulated Light"; pp. 1-7; printed on Aug. 30, 2004.|
|8||Firelily Designs; "Color Vision, Color Deficiency"; pp. 1-12; located at http://firelily.com/opinions/color.html; printed on Dec. 13, 2004; bearing a Copyright date of 1996-2003.|
|9||FVM: Program Abstracts; "Program Abstracts"; pp. 1-25; located at http://www.cvs.rochester.edu/fvm-progabst.html; printed on Dec. 13, 2004.|
|10||Gratton, Gabriele; Fabiani, Monica; Corballis, Paul M.; Hood, Donald C.; Goodman-Wood, Marsha R.; Hirsch, Joy; Kim, Karl; Friedman, David; Gratton, Enrico; "Fast and Localized Event-Related Optical Signals (EROS) in the Human Occipital Cortex: Comparisons with the Visual Evoked Potential and fMRI"; Neuroimage 6; bearing a date of 1997 and Dec. 34, 1996; pp. 168-180 ; Article No. NI970298.|
|11||Heeger, David J.; "Linking visual perception with human brain activity"; Current Opionion in Neurobiology; bearing a date of 1999, 9; pp. 474-479; located at: http://biomednet.com/elecref/0959438800900474.|
|12||Heeger, David J.; Ress, David; "What Does fMRI Tell Us About Neuronal Activity?"; Feb. 2002; vol. 3; pp. 142-151; located at: www.nature.com/reviews/neuro.|
|13||Heeger, David; "Recent Publications"; printed on Sep. 30, 2004; pp. 1-20; located at: http://www,cns.nyu.edu/~david/publications.html.|
|14||Intes, X.; Chance, B.; Holboke, M.J.; Yodh, A.G.; "Interfering diffusive photon-density waves with an absorbing-flourescent inhomogeneity"; Optics Express; bearing dates of Nov. 9, 2000, Jan. 17, 2001 and Jan. 29, 2001; vol. 8, No. 3; pp. 223-231.|
|15||Intes, X.; Ntziachristos, V.; Chance B.; "Analytical model for dual-interfering sources diffuse optical tomography"; Optics Express; bearing dates of Sep. 19, 2001, Dec. 14, 2001 and Jan. 14, 2002; vol. 10, No. 1; pp. 2-14.|
|16||Krulevitch, Peter; Bierden, Paul; Bifano, Thomas; Carr, Emily; Diams, Clara; Dyson, Harold; Helmbrecht, Michael; Kurczynski, Peter; Muller, Richard; Olivier, Scot; Peter, Yves-Alain; Sadoulet, Bernard; Solgaard, Olav; and Yang, E.H.; "MOEMS spatial light modulator development at the Center for Adaptive Optics"; bearing a date of 2003; pp. 227-234.|
|17||Lewotsky, Kristin; "Seeing into the Body"; Spie's OEMagazine; bearing a date of Jul. 2003; p. 15.|
|18||Makeig, Scott; Westerfield, Marissa; Townsend, Jeanne; Jung, Tzyy-Ping; Courchesne, Eric; Sejnowski,Terrence J.; "Functionally Independent Componenets of Early Event-Related Potentials in a Visual Spatial Attention Task"; Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society; Biological Sciences: 354: 1135-44; bearing a date of Jun. 5, 1999; pp. 1-23.|
|19||Malonek, Dov; Dirnagl, Ulrich; Lindauer, Ute; Yamada, Katsuya; Kanno, Iwao; Grinvald, Amiram; "Vascular imprints of neuronal activity: Relationships between the dynamics of cortical blood flow, oxygenation, and volume changes following sensory stimulation"; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Neurobiology; bearing dates of October 24, 1997; Jun. 9, 1997; and Dec. 1997; vol. 94; pp. 14826-14831.|
|20||Morgan, S.P.; Yong, K.Y.; "Controlling the phase response of a diffusive wave phased array system"; Optics Express; bearing dates of Oct. 19, 2000, Dec. 7, 2000, and Dec. 18, 2000; Vo. 7, No. 13; pp. 540-546.|
|21||Neri, Peter; Heeger, David J.; "Spatiotemporal mechanisms for detecting and identifying image features in human vision"; Nature Neuroscience; bearing dates of Jul. 8, 2002 and Aug. 2002; vol. 5, No. 8; pp. 812-816.|
|22||Photonics at Imperial College; Applied Optics: "Wavefront sensing of the human eye"; "Single-pass measurement of the wave aberration of the human eye"; bearing a date of Jul. 14, 2004; pp. 1-2; printed on Jul. 14, 2004; located at: http://op.ph.ic.ac.uk/research/index.html.|
|23||Photonics at Imperial College; Applied Optics: "Wavefront sensing of the human eye"; "The double-pass process"; printed on Jul. 14, 2004; pp. 1; located at: http://op.ph.ic.ac.uk/research/index.html.|
|24||R&D Where Innovation Begins; editorial: "Vision Correction for the 21st Century"; printed on Aug. 30, 2004; pp. 1-3; located at: http://www.rdmag.com/Scripts/ShowPR.asp?PUBCODE=014&ACCT=1400000100&ISSUE=0401&RELTYPE=PR&PRODCODE=00000000&PRODLETT=K.|
|25||Ress, David; Heeger, David J.; "Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex"; Nature Neuroscience; bearing dates of Mar. 10, 2003 and Apr. 2003; vol. 6., No. 4; pp. 414-420.|
|26||Schaeffel, F ; Wilhelm, H.; Zrenner, E.; "Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors"; The Journal of Physiology; bearing a date of 1993; pp. 1-3; Copyright 1993 by The Physiological Society:; printed on Jul. 13, 2004; located at: http://jp.physoc.org/cgi/content/abstract/461/1/301.|
|27||Starner, T; "Human-powered wearable computing"; Systems Journal; IBM Corporation; bearing various dates of 1996 and 1998; pp. 1-14; printed on Jun. 1, 2004; located at: http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/mit/sectione/starner.html.|
|28||U.S. Appl. No. 11/494,803, Goodall et al.|
|29||U.S. Appl. No. 11/495,165, Hillis et al.|
|30||U.S. Appl. No. 11/495,167, Hillis et al.|
|31||U.S. Appl. No. 11/523,172, Goodall et al.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7777766 *||Mar 6, 2007||Aug 17, 2010||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Image display apparatus and method|
|US7931373 *||Jan 21, 2009||Apr 26, 2011||The Invention Science Fund I, Llc||Vision modification with reflected image|
| || |
|U.S. Classification||351/247, 351/205|
|Cooperative Classification||G02C7/085, A61B5/04001, G02C7/083, G06T7/0002, G02C7/02|
|European Classification||G02C7/08E2, G02C7/08E4, A61B3/12, A61B5/04B, G02C7/02, G06T7/00B|
|Mar 30, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 9, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INVENTION SCIENCE FUND I, WASHINGTON
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE ASSIGNOR SHOULD BE SEARETE LLC NOT LILY GUSE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 023502 FRAME 0195;ASSIGNOR:SEARETE LLC;REEL/FRAME:023631/0956
Effective date: 20091110
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE ASSIGNOR SHOULD BE SEARETE LLC NOT LILY GUSE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 023502 FRAME 0195. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE LILY GUSE WAS MISTAKENLY ENTERED AS ASSIGNOR ON THE ELECTRONIC FILING ASSGT COVER SHEET;ASSIGNOR:SEARETE LLC;REEL/FRAME:023631/0956
|Nov 11, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INVENTION SCIENCE FUND I, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GUSE, LILY;REEL/FRAME:023502/0195
Effective date: 20091110
|Feb 24, 2009||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Oct 2, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SEARETE LLC, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HILLIS, W. DANIEL;HYDE, RODERICK A.;ISHIKAWA, MURIEL Y.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018357/0136;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060803 TO 20060913