reply to post by Thermo Klein
No 124 foot wide plane goes through a wall without breaking it down.
Again, we are missing the point!!!!!
A consistant repeating of the 'wingspan' of nearly 125 feet is irrelevant!!!!!
It is an intentional distraction from the other facts.
I tried to explain earlier....the MASS of the wing sections, outboard of the heavier structure more inboard (where the relatively heavy engines are
mounted....and where most of the landing --- vertical --- loads must be distributed throughout the structure...)
...the wing structure 'outboard' of the main center "beefier" sections is actually quite fragile.
...WHEN it is smashed up against a building facade, such as was seen at the Pentagon!
(Please, keep in mind, there was an incredible difference in the facades of the WTC Towers' facades, when compared to how the
pentagon is constructed).
I have been wondering if the PHYSICS involved with incredibly high-speed airplane crashes just aren't comprehended by these folks who 'question'
the events of 9/11.
Or, if PHYSICS basics in general aren't understood!
Also (and this may deserve its own thread, perhaps) I am beginning to wonder if most of these "questioners" of the 9/11 facts aren't just too
young, with limited life experience, to fully understand the real sciences involved....maybe THIS is why these 'arguments' continue???
(This co-incides with other
threads that try to continually cry "fake" on the great work of NASA, and especially the Apollo Moon
missions....I see a pattern of mis-understanding, based on POOR information, and inadequate research....)