A lot has been made of GZ profiling TM who was wearing a hoodie as if only black people wear hoodies. Let's deal with facts vs speculation. First, many would love to believe GZ is a racist and only sought out TM because he was a black guy wearing a hoodie. 1. There is zero evidence that GZ is a racist, the FBI has done already a pretty extensive evaluation of this and has found nothing (Fact not speculation). 2. It has been revealed that GZ brought a black date to a prom, mentored black kids, and stood up for a black male who he thought was being discriminated by the Sanford police. I doubt a racist would do this. 3. One of the jurors on CNN believed GZ was a conscientious person who wanted to help protect the area. She said she truly believed the person wondering around in the rain simply looked suspicious and the fact he was wearing a hoodie or a person of color meant nothing to GZ. She believed if that person was white or brown or yellow it would not have mattered. I know this goes against the tired narrative that GZ hates blacks wearing hoodies. Now, this was her opinion and not fact and I'll state as such. The point is, there is zero evidence ZERO that GZ followed TM because he was black and wearing a hoodie. What so many want to point out is that GZ should not have followed as if by doing so he broke the law. I suspect in a similar situation most of us would have done what GZ did and investigated further. Not because the person was black but because that area had had breakins before, he was there to help prevent such an occurance. Both of these two could have done some things differently but the crime was TM struck first ( I say that because GZ had injuries, TM did not other than a bullet). This was a fair trial and 6 jurors found GZ not guilty. The hoodie simply caught the eye but no more than the person acted suspicious to GZ and seemed worthy of keeping an eye on.