- The Virginia Historical Society blog has a post up on why the Civil War started. I consider this to be a more complex question than most people admit. It was about slavery, but it wasn't just about slavery - and it wasn't about slavery in the way that most people think it was (i.e. - it wasn't about abolition per se). That's my view from a very cursory reading of the evidence. One thing I do think is important, though, is to differentiate between the Deep South and the Upper South and their quite different justifications and the implications of those justifications. This blog post does a good job highlighting the distinction of Virginia's (eventual) decision to secede.
- Jonathan Chait quotes the National Review on conservatism and civil rights. I don't have time to read the whole NRO piece, but this is the key from Chait's post:
"Voters may reasonably conclude that a political philosophy that places such strict limits on government that it cannot ban racial discrimination in circumstances such as those of the South in the mid-1960s is defective... They also erred about the Constitution, even as they, like Paul, urged restraint in its name. Too many conservatives in the Sixties treated the claim that the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution are not valid law as though it were a serious argument. But even those who were immune to this kookery acted as though the enactment of these amendments had changed nothing."- A discussion of the autobiography of Civil Rights leader Medgar Evers on C-Span.
- The financial crisis in Greece has delayed the delivery of the statue of Martin Luther King Jr. from China. The Greeks had offered to ship the statue for free, but have been unable to deliver. It will eventually come, and everyone seems gracious and understanding about the tough spot that Greece is in.
I also have two questions for readers:
1. Glenn Beck is holding a rally at the Lincoln Memorial on August 28th this year. August 28th (aside from being my birthday) is the day that King delivered his "I Have a Dream" speech at the Lincoln Memorial. The theme of the rally is pretty unobjectionable, but given King's politics some people think it's an opportunistic move. All the speakers are prominent conservatives and libertarians, so even though the rally is billed as a broader patriotic event, you never know what's going to be said there. What do readers think of this?
2. This is a more specific question, but does anyone know how the liberation of serfs and peasants in Europe in the late 1840s and early 1850s affected the discussion about slavery in the United States? I'm still reading the 1848 revolution book because I've found barely any time to read, but I just recently read the section that deals with the end of serfdom, and I was curious if there was any crossover. You usually hear about three factors driving the debate over slavery in America. First, the slave uprisings by guys like Nat Turner in the early 1830s. Second, the rise in importance of the cotton crop. And third, the expansion west, which would raise over and over the question of whether slavery would exist in the territories and new states. But you never hear anything about how Americans reacted to the end to serfdom. This seems like it would be very important. The institutions of serfdom and chattel slavery are of course very different, but many of the problems and questions overlapped. Does anything know if this had any impact?