posted on May, 9 2009 @ 01:53 PM
I have a theory that i never found a trace of until now (correct me if i am wrong).
First, let's suppose the terrorist attack was real; however the damage were incredible but not enough to bring the buildings down.
Such a situation was predictable, be it due to an attack, a fire accident, a real plane crash or whatever, so the engineers had to imagine the
The price to reconstruct the towers if half-destroyed would be unbelievable. Depending on the damage level, they would probably need to be brought
down anyway. Such an officially conducted operation would also cost incredible amounts just to guarantee the safety of the other buildings and
methodic cleaning of the remains.
If during construction (or later), you directly implement autodestruction devices, you gain control of the consequences by avoiding too much hassles
and costs, by camouflaging the "removal" of the building within the accident itself. A convenient way also to make the insurance pay for the whole
destruction, not only for the initial damages.
Is this theory possible and related to the suspicious Silverstein's moves two month before 9/11 ?