Fred Reed and Me Who Are These Jokers
by Paul Gottfried by
30 August 2004
[Original here here. My
comments in bold.]
Fred Reed and I have what seems to be a
shared problem, receiving hallucinatory notes from anti-Semitic readers
who insist, "the Jews are behind everything."
Now, does anyone
really say that? I don't believe it for a second. Why the need to distort
and ridicule? Would Paul Gottfried or Fred Reed care to publicly debate
Alex Linder or myself? "Bring it on."
Like Reed, I also feel
impelled to let my correspondents know that they have their heads screwed
on the wrong way.
Again. Why the need to insult and degrade?
Nothing but respect and decorum for the "nuke the Arabs" crowd, but open
season on the Jews' critics?
How can Jews, who account for
less than two percent of the American population and for less than that in
Europe, explain the Western world's descent into multicultural lunacy,
including the advocacy of open borders, the glorification of the Muslims
as a peaceful and enriching presence, and the treatment of homosexual
relations as a privileged human association?
To put the
question another way, How can the jews, who account for less than two
percent of the American population, own nearly all of the news
and entertainment media, which are the primary formative influence
over America attitudes and opinions and have been for more than half a
century. How can the same jews constitute the leadership of nearly all organized
leftist political and intellectual activity over the past century,
including Marxism and neo-conservatism.
Easy. It's in their interest to do so, so they do it. They have the power
to do it through their dominance of the mass media, their financial power
Billy Graham to Richard Nixon: "This
stranglehold [of the jews on the media] has got to be broken or the
country's going down the drain."
"You believe that?" says Nixon
"Yes, sir," says Graham.
"Oh, boy," replies Nixon. "So do
I. I can't ever say that, but I believe it."
Who else in 1965 had
the motive or the ability to open America's
borders? Who else wanted that? Was it Irish and German pressure groups
who pushed for these changes? Was it organized Baptist pressure that
influenced lawmakers to vote for these acts? Is this what Gottfried
thinks? Does Gottfried not know that more
than 50 percent of the Democratic party's finances come from Jewish
donors? Historically speaking the Democratic party has been the jewish
party; jews being the only group on the left with any wealth or power or
influence. Was it rich white gentiles in the media who advocated every
destructive leftist policy and program and political and social attitude?
Was it white gentiles who gave Hollywood it's character? Where are all
these white gentiles? Where is the white gentile conspiracy? All I see is
powerful jewish organizations, jewish dominated mass media, and a lot of
career-minded and deluded camp followers.
Gottfried and Fred Reed
know that we're fighting a war with Iraq for Jews.
Is this not so? Are they denying this? They understand that our whole
foreign policy in the middle east is geared toward securing jewish
interests. How could this be if the jews only constitute 2% of the America
population and don't have the power to shape policy and public opinion?
Why is public opinion always against any group the jews are against? Why
do Americans despise Arabs as much as they do 'white supremists' and did
Germans? The rosetta stone of American politics: Jewish interests. Jewish
interests dictate the meaning of political correctness as
disseminated through the mass media. As jewish interests change, what is
politically correct changes: that is why the 'liberal media' today are
firmly behind the war in Iraq, flags a-flutter on every screen since 911,
a neo-fascism in the works. The executives didn't change. Their ideology
didn't change. Conditions changed. The new patriotism is kosher: it is in
jewish interests. Racism is politically correct -- acceptable, anyway --
as long as it is directed against the jews' enemies. The anti-war movement
has no steam - it is still out there, wondering why things aren't working
the same this time. Here's why: there is no jewish interest in and no
jewish support behind it; no jewish leadership, organization, financial
backing and media placement. And so it is not politically correct. Jewish
interests - the key to understanding American politics.
constitute far less a percentage of the population of most European
countries than America, and yet in these countries it is illegal to speak against
jews or their genocidal
multi-racialist policies. Are jews not actively pursuing the same legislation
here? Does the FBI not go on about it's partnership
with the ADL? How could this be when the jews are but a 2% minority? Are
you guys kidding?
When the jews of Clinton's administration (Sec
of State Albright, Sec of Defense Cohen, Nat Sec Adv. Berger) bombed Serbia for
its ethnic policies, and all the mass media and all of the major jewish
organizations in America supported this campaign, which NATO General jew
Wesley Kahn Clark explained thusly: "There is no room in modern Europe for
ethnically pure states," were there any other groups seriously advocating
it? No, but everyone else went along and kept their mouths shut. It was
the power of the media to shape public opinion and distort the facts which
mattered, and enabled the jew-dominated Clinton government to pursue this
If one subtracted the Jewish vote in New Jersey,
Connecticut, and Massachusetts, would these states be significantly less
leftist in their politics?
Ok, Saul, and what if you subtracted
jewish money from the bargain, not just now, but for the past 50 years?
There would be no Democratic party. There would have been no civil rights
movement, no money for it, no legal representation for it. There would
have been no pressure on Congress to change the immigration law in 1965.
And what if the media had been staffed with white gentiles instead of jews
during this period? And the film industry? Paul Gottfried: a jew, so a
Most of the left-of-center votes (within our narrow
party spectrum) cast in those states come from nominal Catholics, and
these votes are given to social and economic leftists who are also usually
self-described Catholics. Both the Eastern and Midwestern liberal vote is
disproportionately Catholic and comes from non-Jews belonging to what used
to be a very conservative confession. Unless shown differently, I shall
have to conclude on the basis of my evidence that Catholics tend sharply
toward the left in England and Canada as well as in the US.
you suggesting that there were no Catholics, or substantially fewer
Catholics, in the '20s, '30s, and '40s, and '50s, prior to the influence
of television and the jew-led counterculture of the 1960s? No. But
regardless of whether they voted for Democratic or Republican economic
policies, the social and racial policies that came to characterize the
left in the 1960s and 70s and now the right of the '90s and '00s, did not
even exist; they had not yet been popularized by the jewish media and the
jew-led counterculture. The whole country has moved in a certain
direction, shaped and prodded by the influence of the media, and that is
what counts. Not who votes for what political party. The same political
parties operative 150 years ago are operative today on completely
different principles; they conform to public opinion, not shape it. The
purpose of their organization is not to advocate principles, but to garner
votes and a share of power by appealing to the public and making
themselves useful to various interests. What matters is public opinion,
and this is shaped by the mass media. The character of politics in America
has changed immensely during the past 50 years, reflecting the changes in
public sentiment brought on by the influence of television and jew-led
political and social movements.
And, as far as I can tell,
this trend has nothing significant to do with Jews inside or outside the
Well then you don't know shit.
I am also led
to a similar conclusion about mainline Protestant church leaders, who
sound politically and morally like Hollywood actors.
church leaders are just trying to sell themselves to the public, as
always. They conform to the attitudes of the public, whereas the media
shape those attitudes. Church leaders, business leader, entertainers, and
everyone else operate in an atmosphere over which they have little
control; they have to conform to political correctness; the jews of the
media shape it. But you liars are content to speak about political
correctness as though it were a force of nature, mysterious and
unexplainable, unrelated to any real interests or tangible power.
Clearly these leaders are not imitating the politics of Michael
Moore or Jesse Jackson because of their contact with Jewish journalists.
Having just returned from listening to a Protestant convocation speaker at
my college, whom most of my colleagues enthusiastically applauded,
celebrating our "universal citizenship" and the imminent end of Western
nation states, I am still searching for the smudged fingerprint of
international Jewry behind these ravings.
I'll help you find
it. Could these people have found any audience willing to listen to them
60 years ago? No, not more than a few thousand lunatics nationwide would
have listened to them. Now they have half the public willing to listen to
their mad ravings due to the influence of Hollywood and jewish television
on public opinion over the past half century. It's the same with our
popular culture. Degenerates and antisocial elements have always existed
in society. Now they're given record contracts and television shows by the
controlling jewish executives. There are many elements of decay, but none
would have had any serious effect without the jewish power
Those Jews who were present at the speech, one from
Italy, were struck by the lack of reality of the speaker, who thought of
himself as a "global citizen." Perhaps my correspondents could have traced
for them the causal chain by which Jews had brought such madness to
Where I differ with Fred Reed, whose
irreverent humor I have long admired, is in his concern about not
appearing anti-Jewish. Fred goes out of his way to prove that he adores
Jews, including Jewish feminists, and he hopes that Americans never forget
the contributions of those identifiably Jewish scientists who helped end
the polio epidemic of our youths. One may need to bring up here the
problem of ascribed national grace. Am I supposed to like Abe Foxman, who
blames everyone and his cousin for the Holocaust, because of the
scientific prowess of Jonas Salk? This is a bit like suggesting that
Hitler shouldn't seem so bad once we realize that the Austrians also gave
In any case it's irrelevant whether Fred Reed is
socially simpatico with Jews in and around the District of Columbia for
understanding what needs to be emphasized, that our cultural and political
degeneration as a constitutional society has occurred largely
independently of Jewish influence. Most of what my anti-Jewish
correspondents lament could be accounted for without considering the
Jewish-controlled share of the media or the impact of Jewish votes. The
number of Jews in Sweden is negligible, yet politically and morally it is
a far more radicalized country than the US.
Ahem. The jewish
victory in WW2, and the European defeat; the defeat of nationalists
everywhere in Europe, set the tone for the subsequent decades.
Nationalists everywhere were banned or exiled and leftist governments
installed. There is no free speech in Europe, no right to bear arms; not
since the US occupation of 1945. Europeans have been swallowing
American-jewish culture for 50 years. If the European nationalists had
defeated the Soviet Union, instead of the US and the Soviet Union
conquering a half of Europe each, how would Sweden's culture be today? Or
England's? Or Italy's? Would these nations be on the verge of destruction
now, with below replacement level birth rates, flooded with foreigners and
laws against nationalist political activity, laws against speaking out
against the jews and their policies? Would American-jewish culture;
Hollywood, MTV, rap music and modern art, be the culture of Europe? No.
Only because Europe's resistance to the jews was defeated in WW2; Germany,
Italy, and nationalistic volunteers from every country in Europe, is
Europe now on the brink of destruction. The shaping influence in modern
western society: the media, is almost entirely in jewish hands. The
changes that have taken place over the past 50 years have been engineered
by these jews, in service of jewish interests. They are not a coincidence,
they are not a natural development, they are not and never have been
inherent in the western character. Jews have not 'gone along with it;'
they have led it, and are benefiting from it. Alongside the destruction of
European society has arisen the state of Israel, which is now poised to
become a world power, dominating all of the middle east.
Perhaps the reach and behavioral intrusiveness of Swedish
socialism may have more to do with this situation than the presence of a
small stable Jewish minority in the country.
The Germans for
decades have been raised to hate themselves as a people, and when Daniel
Goldhagen visited this guilt-obsessed country after arguing in a book full
of factual errors in 1996 that Germans killed Jews because they had all
been "eliminationist anti-Semites," he was wildly cheered wherever he
went. The Germans have an organization "Anti-Deutsch," consisting of
thousands of young Germans, that demonstrates in favor of the saturation
bombing of German cities in World War Two. But this weird organization is
not Jewish; in fact Germany contains a far lower percentage of Jews than
the US. To the response that Jewish groups have succeeded in making
Germans hate themselves, the counter-response is obvious: "Who the hell
causes the Germans, except for the Germans themselves, to behave
Hmmm... your theory seems to break up upon
the fact that German culture without jewish
influence, i.e., in the 1930s and prior, was anything
but anti-German, and it took the most destructive war in history and the
guilt-inducing psychological warfare and lie campaign of the post-war
period to destroy the German national character the way it has been
destroyed. Likewise European culture was more or less healthy and
developing in a healthy direction up until WW2.
And who orders
white Christian Americans to yammer about their social sins and about the
supposed evil of their national and civilization identity?
Bogus question. Who ever claimed they were acting on orders?
When you're raised and formed in an atmosphere in which these ideas are
dominant then you cannot be held responsible for accepting them. What you
should be asking is who is responsible for creating this atmosphere and
these ideas and imposing them on us, not blaming school children and
television viewers for being victims of this brainwashing. But then you're
a jew - you're not 'us.' It should not surprise us that you want to shift
blame to the victims of the brainwashing and away from the jewish
brainwashers. And it should not surprise us that certain career-minded
folk want to blame abstract "cultural marxists" and "secular humanists" or
a "western death wish" instead of a real, tangible group with power that
will retaliate when its interests are threatened. Many a former employee
of somewhere has learned this over the years: Congressmen, journalists,
teachers, etc. But don't worry, Saul, not all of us have swallowed the
brainwashing, as your emails indicate, and you can be sure that those who
are responsible will be held responsible.
As my recent books
try to make clear, there is something gravely wrong with majority cultures
that ostentatiously despise their inherited identity - and there is no
reason to assume that it would not be there if Jews or blacks disappeared.
But we already know this to be false if we examine the jew-free
cultures of Germany and Italy in the 1930s and the culture of the European
world in general before WW2. The entire intellectual basis for the leftism
of the post-war era was formed by jewish intellectuals during this century
and the latter half of the last. Marx, Freud, Boas, the Frankfurt School,
and all the rest. Will Gottfried deny this? These jewish movements were
run out Europe in the 1930s and '40s. They came and set up shop in the
United States and moved into the universities, eventually coming to
dominate the intellectual climate of American academia. These jewish
intellectuals did not behave like objective students of their fields; they
had no tolerance at all for disagreement. They reviled and ridiculed
anyone who dared to disagree with their 'theories,' or should I say, who
obstructed their agenda, and in this way the basis for "political
correctness" was laid. It was the jewish victory in WW2 that enabled
leftism to contaminate the European world. It was the lack of serious
nationalistic resistance in America to these jews that set the stage for
the post-war counterculture which enveloped the universities and popular
culture, and it was this lack of resistance to the jews in America that
had allowed our military might to be used to crush the nationalistic
resistance in Europe 20 years earlier. This is why Europe is now dying,
because all of its healthy elements, it's nationalistic elements, it's
whole political and cultural leadership, was exterminated by the
victorious allies of WW2, America and the Soviet Union, and replaced by a
jewish culture and leftist leadership.
This idea that there is
something inherent in our European character that causes our people to act
against their own interests or to hate themselves is a vicious lie.
European societies have existed for thousands of years without any sort of
leftist or self-destructive tendencies. The development of these
tendencies go hand in hand with one thing: the emancipation of jews and
their entry into European society during the past two centuries. Jewish
interests and jewish influence are the basis of leftism, nothing else! To
say otherwise is an insult and direct attack upon Europeans everywhere! It
is a deliberate lie aimed to mislead and confuse us and exonerate our
enemies, or else a ploy by hacks to protect their own asses. Anyone who
protects our enemies must be treated like an enemy!
Jews, like Noam Chomsky and Israel Shahak, who have played up Jewish
bigotry and ethnic nationalism, have been widely denounced as "self-hating
Jews." But WASPs who dwell on their group's prejudices and alleged
hate-crimes can expect to be generally cheered.
Cheered by some,
while others remain silent out fear of ostracism, fear of being
politically incorrect, and in much of Europe fear of being locked up. Yes,
leftism is white self-hatred. But for the vast majority of jews who are
leftists, and who make up the leadership of leftism, it is not
self-hatred, but white hatred. White self-hatred is induced by
these jewish leftists, their media influence, their intellectual and
cultural influence. The whole jewish-leftist intellectual atmosphere on
college campuses and the corresponding propaganda of the media is a jewish
program, a jewish campaign aimed at advancing jewish interests and
securing jewish power, by destroying potential sources of resistance to
jewish preeminence. Only by destroying the self-confidence and self-image
and identity of whites and suppressing nationalism everywhere can jews
hope to retain their dominance over the culture and politics of western
societies. Jewish leftists are not 'ideological,' they're merely pursuing
their own interests. At the same time that they're 'leftists' they're also
Zionists and supporters of the state of Israel and its policies. While
80-90% of American-resident jews vote for the Democrats, 90% of them are
also pro-Israel. They're only 'leftists' when it comes to harming us, when
promoting policies that harm us. In Israel they support ethnic cleansing,
ethnic exclusivism, expansion and military conquest. Here they promote
multiculturalism, white guilt, universal tolerance and political
correctness. It is perfectly consistent: among themselves they promote
what serves their group, among us they promote what serves their group by
harming our group. There is no contradiction when you understand the basis
of their activity. Leftism is simply jewish politics in a gentile society;
jewish intellectuals, jewish money, jewish organizers, jewish
propagandists, advancing jewish group interests by rendering harmless
potential sources of resistance to themselves: nationalism, racial
identity, cultural cohesion, religious identity, etc. Leftism is the
jewish program for subduing a nation and bringing themselves to power in
it; destroying the nation's pride and self-confidence and cohesiveness,
and thus creating conditions in which jewish power can thrive unopposed.
Seriously, how is it that in a country that is 90% Christian, public
displays of Christianity are practically illegal? It is the jews alone who
wanted this, for fear of the potentially antiSemitic consequences of a
strong Christian identity in the population and the effect such might have
on their status and position. And at 2% of the population they're able to
do it, they have the power. It is no different where race is concerned.
Racial identity is as much a threat to the jewish dominance of western
societies as religious identity; any identity, any cohesion among our
people is a danger to jewish power over us. It is jews alone who have had
the motive and the ability to suppress nationalism throughout the western
world for the past half century, jews alone who have blocked the advance
of right wing and nationalistic political movements; through censorship,
through distortion, through ridicule and demonization, through financial
and media pressure; jews alone have had the motive and the ability to
suppress nationalistic feeling and political activity in the white
world. And what they've done to us is precisely what they want to do
to the Muslim world, and for this reason want to use American military
might to subdue the Muslim world and open it up to jewish influence. How
long before Hollywood movies and jewish television programs come to
dominate the culture of the new Iraq? How long before Judeo-Islam is
proclaimed, and Sunni preachers are bewailing the historical guilt of the
Muslim peoples for their intolerance and anti-Semitism? Well, that is how
the jews would have it. That is what they're aiming for. It isn't just
about Israeli security, it is about total jewish control.
wonder whether my anti-Jewish correspondents have ever thought the
obvious, that minorities often behave the way majorities want them to.
America's German and Sephardic Jews in the nineteenth century tried to
model themselves on WASP high society, believing that they had to do so to
move up socially and professionally.
Bullshit. jews have been
the foremost subversives and radicals, actively trying to overthrow the
status quo and gain influence and power, as jews.
Jews who spew hate on gentiles also move up, because they are doing to
Euro-American-Christians what the majority society wants, blaming that
society for the ills of humanity and urging it to become a multicultural
Bullshit; they're not conforming to our way and never
have. We're conforming to them, to the culture they've built for us in
order to advance their interests. They're the ones with the power, not us.
They remain as jewish as they've ever been; we're just ceasing to be
This should not be read as a justification of the usual
suspects but it is a reminder of why Dershowitz, Foxman, and Goldhagen
make money and enjoy popularity among loads of Christians as well as Jews.
Unlike nineteenth-century Germany or an older America, in our society it
pays for bad-mannered, resentful Jews to exhibit their worst qualities.
They are providing a morally confused and historically misinformed
majority with what it craves.
Jews are the leadership, the
shapers of the modern anti-white culture and intellectual paradigm you
lament. And it is anything but harmful to themselves. Rather, they are in
their element now in the West, more powerful than ever before, with a
dumbed down, self hating population of dazed media-slaves to use and
exploit. Jews get their empire in the middle east while white kids die to
secure it, and we Europeans and Americans get racial oblivion in the
I'll have a few jews sum it up:
"The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the
American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will
all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a
Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We have been
nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a
century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous
nature of our population tends to make it irreversible - and makes our
constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever. (Earl
Raab, Jewish Bulletin, February 19, p. 23)
Earl Raab served for thirty-five years as Executive Director of the San
Francisco Jewish Community Relations Council and is currently Director of
the Perlmutter Institute for Jewish Advocacy at Brandeis University. Raab,
like most Jews and all Jewish organizations, promotes multiracialism and
nonwhite immigration in the United States and other majority-White
nations, while supporting Jewish racialism (Zionism) and a Jews-only
immigration policy in Israel.
the American power structure without Jews is like remaking sports without
blacks. At least when it comes to blacks in sports, you can talk about it;
you can say that blacks changed sports. But no one is allowed to speak up
about something we all quietly know: Jews changed America."
is hardly an area of public life on which Jews have not had a profound
impact in the last generation, as discrimination against them ended and as
they gained power. The civil rights movement reflects Jewish values of
justice. Feminism is a reflection of liberal Jewish matriarchal values
(note the Jewish groups that are talking about Roe v. Wade in opposing
John Ashcroft for Attorney General). Ever-more-powerful Jews in the media
have ushered in the information age. Psychologically attuned Jews and
Hollywood Jews changed the language of popular culture-Seinfeld,
Weinstein... altogether they represent the force of Jewish values coming
into public life."
"...the greatly diminished influence of church
on public mores wouldn't have happened without secularized Jews gaining
"And no one ever talks about it. The most
important change in establishment culture in the last 25 years, and it
"There are so many Jews in the media that the cone
of silence falls over the territory where you might expect wider
"I remember when I got to Harvard in 1972, and all my
outsider Jewish energy was focused on tearing down the WASP bastions that
kept me back. And we tore them down."
"...Jewish imagination has
been the most powerful force in elite life in the last generation...the
celebration of feminism, the emergence of the media: all have been
spearheaded by Jews who re-imagined America."
"So long as Jews
continue to see themselves as powerless, they fail to recognize the effect
they have had on society and come to terms with their real spot: big
winners in the new order. It looks like the next chapter in the democratic
discourse is going to be about winners and losers in the globalist pursuit
("Jews in Bush's Cabinet? Don't Hold Your Breath"
by Philip Weiss, New York Observer, December 22, 2001)
you, jew Gottfried, and fuck you, jew-tool Fred Reed.
wish: That one day we can state truly, "Like all jews, Paul Gott