Eucalyptus trees have been in California for over 150 years, and ecosystems across the state have evolved to include them. Let’s not let a few misguided radicals destroy forests of one of the very few large trees that will grow in our arid climate. It’s happening right now in the San Dieguito River Valley and needs to be stopped. – Will Lofft, Scripps Ranch
I recently read, with great dismay, your article detailing the plans to clear the majestic eucalyptus forest from the Del Dios Gorge. I was struck by the perspective taken by the author, that, without exception, removing “nonnative” species, and specifically eucalyptus, is desirable. Has anybody checked with the homeowners in the area if they would prefer gazing upon native chaparral? What about the hundreds of species of birds, insects and other animals that call the forest home?
There are a couple of “facts” presented in the article that do not stand up under scrutiny. First and foremost is the mention that “The eucalyptus forest is susceptible to burning, too, so the project helps reduce the risk of wildfires.” This unsubstantiated myth has been perpetuated by the Union-Tribune since the 2003 wildfires. Trees can and do burn during wildfires, but I have yet to see a shred of real evidence that eucalyptus pose any greater threat than other species of tree (many types of eucalyptus are actually categorized as fire-resistant). The “fact” is that our native chaparral and grasses are far more dangerous and flammable that any species of tree. This is a topic with which I am somewhat familiar, as I lost my house in the 2003 wildfires.
The second “fact” is that eucalyptus threaten native wildlife populations. “The restored gorge is expected to give a boost to several bird species – the least Bell’s vireo, yellow warbler and yellow-breasted chat.” A simple Google search will show that eucalyptus forests provide habitat for many native (and even some endangered) species of bird. Many types of hawks nest in the eucalyptus as well. If the eucalyptus are removed, we may experience an increase in the population of least Bell’s vireo, yellow warbler and yellow-breasted chats, but it will likely be at the expense of other native birds. (A study conducted in urban areas of Santa Clara County found that 61 percent of red-shouldered hawk nests found over two years were in eucalyptus or other exotic trees, with tree height and diameter being the most significant predictors of suitability for nesting. This study found that hawks nesting in eucalyptus and other exotic trees were found to have higher breeding success, due to better stability and cover provided by those trees compared with native species).
In the future, more investigative journalism and presentation of both sides of the issues would be greatly appreciated. – John Ross, San Diego
Say ‘no’ to NIMBYs
The recent article “Activist fears loss of backcountry’s essence” (Dec. 2) has me extremely concerned that one vocal person speaking for a small minority can hold so much power when it comes to economic recovery in San Diego County. Instead of accepting everything that Donna Tisdale says as gospel truth, perhaps you should look into some of her complaints a little more closely. They are not based on careful evaluation, but instead follow a “just say ‘no’ ” policy.