I was wondering if anyone could comment on the following two questions?
1. If morality is determined through a utilitarian concept which can be measured through scientific inquiry than why is religion out of bounds for being a vehicle to better living? After all in 2003, an analysis by Smith, McCullough, and Poll of over 200 social studies found that high religiousness (at least weekly church or synagogue attendance) predicts lower risk for depression and drug abuse, fewer suicide attempts, and more reports of life satisfaction.
2. Sam Harris states that religion is “unhelpful” because it bases morality and how one should act more on the next life rather than this current one. Yet, why is this always bad? After all the early Christians were able to concern themselves with those who had smallpox, and various other diseases because they were more interested in their next life rather than their present day one? The Roman pagans ran to the hills while the Christians faced the present dangers facing their society.