Again, you've pre-determined the outcome by assuming that the unborn is not a person. The pro-life position is that you're not "taking full control" of someone's life, you're merely preventing an act of murder from taking place. Similar to preventing any other murder, it would then be a perfectly reasonable libertarian position.
Again, I'm not saying one side or the other of the abortion dilemma is correct. I'm merely acknowledging that there IS a dilemma. You're just ignoring the moral question entirely and skipping straight to the conclusion, at which point you assume the other side must be insane or stupid.
If you won't acknowledge that there is a moral dilemma, then you've got issues.
I wasn't talking about that. I understand their point of view. Like I said, the merit of the law doesn't matter. That means even if you think the law is good, it still doesn't change anything.
So again, with the logic you are using EVERYONE is a libertarian.
As for the moral dilemma, it's not quite a dilemma, but it's close. But I also addressed that, explained my position and issued an ignored challenge a couple posts back. It's also just a red herring because the merit of it has nothing to do with it.