Saturday, April 21, 2007 9:49:12 AM
How did you fools jump from debating whether our endurance came from evolution to debating religious beliefs? I found the article interesting, although I'm sure there must be other animals with better endurance than us.
Friday, April 20, 2007 9:50:41 PM
Actually, they kind of did specify evidence. Thins like the ability to sweat and breathe from of our mouths (unique to the animal kingdom and specially suited for this task). The note that Australian Aborigines (our best living link to ancient human methods) still use this kind of hunting and are successful at it for the same reasons postulated in the article. If you don't like the theory, the neat thing about them is that you can give counter-theories, and unless we can disprove yours or yours gives no help in predicting what we`re discussing in the future, we either have to abandon our theory or modify it. As for your flagellum argument, what theory says the first organic life on Earth had to have fully developed flagella or could not have developed it? And how can there possibly be evidence of speciation but not of one species into another? That`s the *definition* of speciation.
Friday, April 20, 2007 8:27:21 PM
there is evidence of speciation/adaption, but not one species into another. there is evidence of creation, such as the flagullum, which cannot work unless its fully formed, thus life had to have been created as a whole, not slowly over time. there is more but its beyond the scope of this arena, which doesn't lend itself to dicussion very well.