"Kadaitcha Man" <[Only registered users see links. ].net> wrote in message
news:8rpVpP6aJJeF6C11C1F9KLLFRKfvph06@bird.adaptiv econcepts.com... [Only registered users see links. ]
****wit. It takes energy to separate the H from H2O. Quite a lot of it. Why
you think water is such stable molecule? ****wit.
Or do you suggest we just find a protostar,
go there with a bucket and tip it into the gas tank? Or maybe there are
huge underground reservoirs of liquid hydrogen, just waiting for us to
come and pump it all out? Or maybe Arnie can get Holywood to do its stuff
and re-arrange reality.
Or maybe Dubya can just ask god, and it will rain hydrogen.
BTW, I do not think you are much good at gratuitous insults.
"The Road To Utopia" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:%GSNb.13177$[Only registered users see links. ].pas.eart hlink.net...
Nope. It will make very little difference, if any, except to Californians
LA will still bask in its photochemical smog.
Kadaitcha Man <[Only registered users see links. ].net> wrote:
Not a bad idea really. Think about it; if all the cattle earmarked for BSE infected
slaughter, were gathered together as you suggest, but kept alive, this could
indeed be achieved, simply because when BSE really takes hold, cows tend
to start staggering on the spot.
Indeed. Methane is easily stored inside sheep, pigs and cows. To renew it,
just feed them grass and rotting vegetables. There are however some
technical difficulties with hooking the arse end of bovines or other
cloven-hooved animals to your Ferrari.
According to General Motors, a rollout of about 12,000 hydrogen pumps across
main US highways will give reliable coverage for 70% of the US motor vehicle
driving population, at a cost of $US10-15 billion. One Larry Burns, head of
GM's research arm states that "... fuel infrastructure is not a showstopper
for fuel cells. It is quite doable."
The $US15 billion is paltry when compared to the $150 billion or so the US
spent building those highways fifty years ago.
The next step is in the hands of the mass production capabilities of the
engine makers... getting the cost of fuel cells down from $US500/kW to the
more reasonable $50/kW for petroleum and diesel.
Steve Ralph wrote: [Only registered users see links. ]
Why do you keep signing off then continue to write? Are you in a dither,
The protostar idea is good, but I doubt the gas tank would hold up too well.
Got any other bright ideas?
You'll need a brain to figure this next bit out... ask someone to help you.
A passing garden slug maybe...
Let's go back to that idea of yours about those seemingly odd "underground
reservoirs of liquid hydrogen". What the **** do you think natural gas is,
dumb****? It's a ****ing hydrocarbon. HYDRO-carbon, get it, ****nuts? HYDRO?
Hydrogen is mass produced in a process known as steam reforming. Natural
gas, LPG or naphtha are mixed with steam and heated in the presence of a
catalyst to produce crude ****ing hydrogen, you dumb cunt. Very little
electrical energy is required to produce a large amount of power through
hydrogen production, you ****ing nincompoop. What's more, hydrogen provides
the equivalent of three times the energy of petrol and about seven times the
equivalent energy of coal.
I'd say the same for you but I didn't give you a passing thought, you total
twat. You can **** off and die now.