maybe stem cells - if proven to be most effective long-term?? Curious why there's so few posts on the stem cell board compared to others. Is it only because travel to China is daunting? That i can understand (shake hands).
But after reading Robert Becker's book "Body Electric", that book got me hooked on the efficacy of stem cells (he was a genious, and the term "stem cells" hadn't even been coined yet!
I heard statistics, though, that 33% of people are healed by stem cells, and yet another 33% only somewhat healed, while the last third do not show improvement.
Which is why I so badly want the Stem Cell clinics to integrate L.I.F.E. or ROFES-style pictorial
software, so they can see WHY some patients do improve, while others don't.
Reachable via PM. Seems I have Higbee's HSII on ThisIsMS. Frustrated by MSers, FMers, Lymers & Prematurely-Aged-By-EMFers who prefer cryptic jargonian Systems Vs. Intuitive empirical experience. Don't simple truths count for anything anymore?