US 7182263 B2
An arrangement for determining light beam position in an electro-optical reader, image projector and like devices includes a drive for moving a scanning light beam at a scan frequency across a target as a scan line, and an electro-optical feedback assembly operatively connected to the drive, for optically detecting scan line position during beam movement, and for generating a feedback signal at the scan frequency, the feedback signal being indicative of the scan line position. A feedback coil in the drive is eliminated to avoid electromagnetic coupling between multiple coils in the drive.
1. An arrangement for determining light beam position, comprising:
a) a drive for moving a scanning light beam at a scan frequency across a target as a scan line;
b) means for generating a feedback beam; and
c) electro-optical feedback means operatively connected to the drive, for optically detecting scan line position during scanning light beam movement, and a position sensitive device for optically detecting position of the feedback beam to generate a feedback signal at said scan frequency, the feedback signal being indicative of the scan line position, and a control circuit for controlling the drive as a function of the feedback signal.
2. The arrangement of
3. The arrangement of
4. The arrangement of
5. The arrangement of
6. The arrangement of
7. The arrangement of
8. The arrangement of
9. The arrangement of
10. The arrangement of
11. The arrangement of
12. The arrangement of
13. A method of determining light beam position, comprising the steps of:
a) moving a scanning light beam generated from a main beam across a target at a scan frequency as a scan line; and
b) optically detecting scan line position, and responsively generating a feedback signal indicative of the scan line position, said feedback signal at said scan frequency being generated by a feedback beam that controls the moving step.
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to monitoring light beam position of scanning light beams employed in electro-optical readers for reading indicia such as bar code symbols, or in image projectors for displaying images and, more particularly, to employing optical feedback to determine beam position.
2. Description of the Related Art
Electro-optical readers are well known in the art for electro-optically transforming a spatial pattern of graphic indicia, known as a symbol, into a time-varying electrical signal which is then decoded into data. Typically, a light beam generated from a light source is focused by a lens along an optical path toward a target that includes the symbol. The light beam is repetitively swept along a scan line or a series of scan lines arranged in a raster pattern over the symbol by moving a scan mirror or some other optical component located in the optical path, or by moving the light source itself. A photodetector detects light scattered or reflected from the symbol and generates an analog electrical signal. Electronic circuitry converts the analog signal into a digitized signal having pulse widths corresponding to physical widths of bars and spaces comprising the symbol, and a decoder decodes the digitized signal into data descriptive of the symbol.
The repetitive sweeping of the light beam is performed by a drive, typically a motor having a rotor oscillatable about an axis. A permanent magnet and the scan mirror are jointly oscillatable with the rotor. The motor is driven by a drive coil wound on a bobbin that is located physically close to the permanent magnet. A secondary or feedback coil is also wound on the same bobbin. When the rotor is moving, the movement of the magnet generates an alternating voltage drive signal in the drive coil. The frequency of the generated drive signal in the drive coil is the same as the rotor motion, with one cycle of the drive signal corresponding to one cycle of rotor motion. The amplitude of the drive signal in the drive coil is proportional to the velocity of the rotor motion. The polarity of the drive signal in the drive coil is dependent on the direction of rotor motion such that a positive half cycle of the drive signal indicates that the rotor is moving in one drive direction, and a negative half cycle indicates that the rotor is moving in the opposite drive direction. Zero crossings of the drive signal occur when the rotor reaches its maximum travel at each end of a respective scan line. At each zero crossing, the rotor stops for an instant and reverses drive direction.
The feedback coil is useful for a variety of purposes. It also generates an alternating voltage signal, known as a feedback signal, due to the movement of the magnet. The frequency and polarity of the feedback signal generated in the feedback coil corresponds to the frequency and polarity of the drive signal. An electrical drive monitoring circuit is often employed to monitor the amplitude of the feedback signal and, for example, turn the light source off if the amplitude falls below a predetermined threshold, thereby indicating that the drive is malfunctioning. An electrical closed loop control circuit is also often employed to process the feedback signal to make decisions about how to continue driving the motor. Still another electronic circuit that is often employed processes the zero crossings of the feedback signal to derive a start-of-scan (SOS) signal that represents rotor motion and is used to synchronize the scan lines.
Although generally satisfactory for its intended purpose, the use of the feedback coil for monitoring for drive failure, for driving the drive, and for generating the SOS signal causes problems. There is undesirable magnetic coupling between the drive and feedback coils. To remove such unwanted coupled signals and the resulting noise and distortion, electronics must be added to actively cancel the coupled signals, and filtering is necessary to ensure control loop stability. Since filtering introduces phase delays, the SOS signal will never represent the true position of a beam spot of the scanning light beam relative to the leading bars and spaces in a target symbol. This problem is solved in the art by adding and adjusting electronics to advance or delay the SOS signal depending on the type of motor used. In addition, when the feedback coil is coupled to the drive coil, an annoying buzzing sound is sometimes generated.
Another arrangement, other than a symbol reader, that repetitively scans a light beam in a raster pattern over a target is an image projector for projecting an image on a display surface, for example, a screen. Typically, one or more energizable lasers of different wavelengths project respective laser beams toward the screen, while an oscillating drive sweeps the beams in scan lines over the screen. The lasers are energized and deenergized during each sweep to create a bit-mapped image on the screen for viewing. As in the case of readers, the drive includes a motor having feedback and drive coils, as described above, with their attendant problems of cross-coupled signals, extra hardware, phase delays and annoying sounds.
Accordingly, it is a general object of this invention to eliminate electromagnetic feedback in light scanning arrangements, such as electro-optical readers and image projectors.
More particularly, it is an object of the present invention to determine light beam position by an optical, rather than an electromagnetic, arrangement.
Still another object of the present invention is to enable drive failure to be monitored, to ensure control loop stability, to generate SOS signals without phase delays, and to eliminate annoying sounds in such light scanning arrangements without employing a feedback coil.
In keeping with the above objects and others which will become apparent hereinafter, one feature of the present invention resides, briefly stated, in an arrangement for, and a method of, determining light beam position by employing a drive for moving a scanning light beam at a scan frequency across a target as a scan line, and by employing electro-optical feedback means operatively connected to the drive for optically detecting scan line position and for generating a feedback signal at said scan frequency, the feedback signal being indicative of the scan line position.
The arrangement may be an electro-optical reader in which case the target is a symbol, preferably a one- or two-dimensional symbol. The arrangement could also be an image projector in which case the target is a screen on which an image is viewable. In either case, the scanning light beam is moved by a drive, for example, a uni- or bi-directional, electrical motor having a rotor on which a light emitting component is mounted for joint oscillating movement. The light emitting component can be a light source, such as a laser diode, or an optical component in the path of the light beam. Preferably, the component is a scan mirror mounted on the rotor and operative for reflecting the scanning light beam therefrom. The motor includes a permanent magnet and a drive coil operative for oscillating the reflector in opposite drive directions to generate a raster pattern of scan lines which extend in mutually orthogonal scan directions over the target. In the case of the reader, a portion of the light derived from the scan lines and scattered by the symbol is processed to read the symbol. In the case of the projector, the light source is energized and deenergized during travel of the beam along each scan line to create the image on the target screen.
In accordance with this invention, no feedback or secondary coil is wound in the motor. The above-described uses of the feedback coil, namely for monitoring for motor failure, for driving the motor, for generating SOS signals, and so on, are performed by reliance on electro-optical feedback arrangements, and not by electromagnetic feedback arrangements. For example, one such electro-optical feedback arrangement utilizes a beam splitter for optically splitting the scanning light beam to form a feedback beam, and a position sensitive drive for detecting the position of the feedback beam. Another arrangement utilizes a plurality of light sources for respectively generating the scanning and feedback beams.
By employing optical feedback, maximum coupling efficiency between the drive coil and the motor magnet can be realized without consideration of a secondary feedback coil. Cancellation circuitry for cross-coupled signals is unnecessary. Minimal filtering may still be needed for loop control and bandwidth limiting. Accuracy of the motor failure signal is improved. An SOS signal derived from optical feedback has no phase delays. Motor startup time no longer has to be delayed by consideration of transformer feedthrough to the feedback coil. There is no annoying sounds related to transformer coupling between coils.
In brief, a magnetic feedback signal is not the best representation of motor position and velocity and, hence, of beam position. The magnetic feedback signal of the prior art becomes corrupted due to signal feedthrough between the drive and feedback coils. An optical feedback signal is not so corrupted and enhances performance.
The novel features which are considered as characteristic of the invention are set forth in particular in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, both as to its construction and its method of operation, together with additional objects and advantages thereof, will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Reference numeral 20 in
In use, an operator holding the handle 21 aims the housing at the symbol and depresses the trigger. The light source 26 emits a light beam which is optically modified and focused by an optical focusing assembly 35 to form a beam spot on the symbol 24. The beam passes through a beam splitter 34 to a scan mirror 36 which is repetitively oscillated at a scan rate of at least 20 scans a second by a motor drive 38. The scan mirror 36 reflects the beam incident thereon to the symbol 24 and sweeps the beam spot in scans across the symbol in a scan pattern. The scan pattern can be a scan line extending lengthwise along the symbol along a scan direction, or a series of scan lines arranged along mutually orthogonal directions, or an omnidirectional pattern, just to name a few possibilities.
The reflected light 31 has a variable intensity over the scan pattern and passes through the window 30 onto the scan mirror 36 where it is reflected onto the splitter 34 and, in turn, reflected to the photodetector 27 for conversion to an analog electrical signal. The signal processing circuitry 28 digitizes and decodes the signal to extract the data encoded in the symbol.
The drive motor 38 is shown in more detail in
As explained above, and as known in the prior art, the feedback coil 42 also interacts with the magnet and generates an electrical feedback signal of the same frequency as the drive signal and is useful for a variety of purposes. For example, the drive circuit 44 includes an error comparator in a closed loop circuit for adjusting the amplitude of the drive signal fed to the drive coil. Also, the feedback signal is used to derive the SOS signal described above, which is fed to the microprocessor for synchronization of the scan lines. In addition, the feedback signal is used to monitor for drive failure.
In accordance with one feature of this invention, it is proposed to eliminate the electromagnetic coupling between the coils 40, 42 and the resulting noise and signal distortion, extra hardware requirement for noise cancellation, filtering and phase adjustment, phase delays, and annoying sounds, all as described above. This is accomplished by eliminating the feedback coil and instead using electro-optical feedback to perform the functions previously accomplished by the feedback coil.
As shown in
The PSD 54 is a linear array of photodiodes and a preferred device is manufactured by Hamamatsu Photonic Devices of Japan and available as Model No. S3932 or S1300. The PSD collects incident light at various angles of incidence and produces two electrical signals at its dual channel outputs. These signals are processed to determine the position and range of the incident light.
Optical feedback eliminates the feedback coil and its associated problems. Maximum coupling efficiency between the motor magnet and the drive coil can now be realized. Noise cancellation circuitry is unnecessary. The SOS signal has no phase delays. Any small oscillations of the feedback beam under a fixed threshold serves as a motor failure indicator.
As mentioned above, each of the above electro-optical feedback embodiments could be used in other scanning arrangements, for example, an image projector of the type exemplified in U.S. Pat. No. 6,655,597. As shown in
Another feature of this invention resides in placing a pair of light pipes 84, 86 within the frame portions 74, 76, and a pair of photodiodes 88, 90 at the ends of the pipes 84, 86. Each pipe is essentially a transparent solid piece of synthetic plastic material for conveying light. When the ends of each scan line strike the pipes, the received light will be transmitted to, and detected by, the photodiodes 88, 90 which, in turn, generate an electrical signal that can be used as the SOS signal. This SOS signal is optically, not magnetically, derived and, hence, is not subject to the electromagnetic coupling problems described above. This electrical signal can also be used to detect motor failure. Instead of the two photodiodes 88, 90, a single photodetector 92 is centrally located to look for light reflected from both frame portions 74, 76.
As more clearly seen in the broken-away view of
Since the projected image employs laser illumination, the arrangement needs to meet FDA regulations (CDH and/or IEC). A proposed approach is to include a photodetector for sensing reflected illumination from the screen 72.
For a built-in screen, the reflected illumination can be calibrated at manufacture. If there is a change in the reflected power, it indicates that either the screen has been removed or an object has entered between the projector and the screen. In either case, the laser can be either shut down, or the laser power can be reduced to much lower levels. The reduced power arrangement can still be used to display directions to the user, directing him to restore the screen in order to regain full power operation. For instance, a message stating “Please aim your display at a uniform background for proper operation!” can be projected.
If the arrangement is used in free projection mode, as shown in
Hence, still another aspect of this invention is embodied in determining whether the screen 72 is present or not and, in response, modifying the supply of electrical energy to the light source 26. A photodiode 96 having a field of view approximately equal to the field of view of the image projector is operative for monitoring the laser light reflected back from the screen 72. The reflectivity of the screen should be uniform across its entire surface so that the photodiode 96 will see a constant fraction of the reflected light. However, if the screen 72 is not present, or if it is torn, the photodiode 96 would detect considerable variations in reflectivity. This information is used to adjust the electrical energy supply 98 to the laser source. If no screen is detected, then the light source is deenergized, preferably within 20 nanoseconds to insure meeting safety regulations. If the screen is detected, then the energy supply 98 can be increased to obtain a brighter display.
To assess the reflectivity of a given point on the screen, not only is the reflected light measured, but also the ratio of reflected/emitted light is calculated. This might be difficult to do in real time. Also, at some points, the laser source might be completely deenergized, and no information about screen reflectivity at those points can be collected. A possible solution is to add an additional infrared (invisible) low power laser operating continuously for detecting the background, and to have the spectral response of the photodiode 96 matched to this infrared laser.
For increased sensitivity, the field of view of the photodiode 96 should be scanned together with the scanning beam as in retro-reflective readers. Instead of a photodiode with adequate temporal resolution, an array of photosensors (e.g., a charge coupled device or a complementary metal oxide semiconductor device) can be used. These devices have the same goal of assessing screen reflectivity at every point. Again, a dedicated infrared illuminator, such as a laser or a flood-illumination LED can be used. An array of passive far-infrared sensors can also be used. These sensors are sensitive to the radiation of the human body and are widely used in security systems. If the combined field of view of the array covers the entire field of view of the image projector, then the presence of any part of a human body in the field of view can be detected, even at significant distances. If a human body is detected, then the electrical energy to the laser diode is shut off for safety purposes.
Another approach to meet CDRH requirements is depicted in
Yet another approach to increase the display brightness without exceeding CDRH limits is to divide the screen area into halves, quadrants, etc., with a different image projector displaying on the various subsections of the screen.
It will be understood that each of the elements described above, or two or more together, also may find a useful application in other types of constructions differing from the types described above.
While the invention has been illustrated and described as embodied in a monitoring light beam position in electro-optical readers and image projectors, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention.
Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the gist of the present invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt it for various applications without omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly constitute essential characteristics of the generic or specific aspects of this invention and, therefore, such adaptations should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalence of the following claims.
What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims.