Edwards got a version of it yesterday.
Speaking to reporters yesterday afternoon, Edwards explained that he personally opposes gay marriage but supports civil unions, and believes each state should set its own marriage policy.
When asked why civil unions could not simply be called marriages, Edwards said, "My answer is the same."
Asked why states, not the federal government, should decide policy, he replied, "Because it's something I think should be decided by the states."
And when asked to explain his personal opposition to gay marriage, he snapped, "I'm done with that question."
I knew this would happen. This distinction was always a sham, because it's a distinction without a difference. Unless the candidates can articulate what the difference is, it's a losing strategy. Until they can articulate the difference, the press will keep asking.