If you are a market researcher, and you want to make sure that you get more reliable results for a subgroup in a survey, what do you do? You must increase the overall sample size (and spend a lot of money), right?
Actually, you don’t.
You can oversample that group only, and then weight it down to its known proportion in the population. For example, you may want to increase the number of managers and decrease the number of housewives (because the former are usually more heterogeneous than the latter). Oversampling is a common research method, and a very cost-effective way to get precise estimates for a subgroup.
This is a real-world solution, and if we have finite resources to solve a real-world problem, resource allocation must be part of the equation. Higher variability usually demands for more resources.
Why is this relevant in a blog about charts and information visualization? Glad you ask.
The Great Irregular Interval Debate
Let me give you an example. A while back, Jon Peltier wrote in his blog:
I don’t understand the obsession with an equal date interval. A line chart need not show the trend of only evenly-spaced data. Suppose I am observing temperatures, and I decide for simplicity that where the temperature hasn’t changed, or where it has been changing steadily, I do not need to record every value. Overnight after the temperature has dropped, I can characterize my temperature profile with one point per hour. As the sun rises, I may need more frequent recordings to capture the morning warm up. Then the clouds blow over, it starts to rain, then it clears up again; I may need minute-by-minute data points to track this. When I make my plot, is it any less relevant because the spacing of the data ranges from minutes to hours?
This is oversampling, and a wise resource allocation, too. In a survey, you weight the subgroup down to its right proportion, and that’s also what you do in a chart, when irregular date intervals are displayed proportionally.
Stephen Few disagrees:
Using a line to connect values along unequal intervals of time or to connect intervals that are not adjacent in time is misleading.
How could we trust graphical representations of time series or frequency distributions if their shapes could have been altered by inconsistently manipulating the sizes of intervals along the scale, either arbitrarily or intentionally to deceive? We can derive meaning from patterns and trends that these graphs display only if the intervals are consistent.
The first chart displays the correct annual sales. The second one displays arbitrarily grouped annual sales and, obviously, its pattern is quite different.
Now, the second chart is plain wrong, so I am not sure if you can use it to argue against unequal intervals.
Let’s use a fairer example with the same dataset and the same arbitrary grouping.
Compare the orange line with Few’s first chart. I actually don’t see much difference. Sure you lose a lot of detail, but the basic pattern is there. Instead of sums, I am using averages (you can’t compare a single year with the total sales of three or four years).
The other two lines show the difference between equal and unequal intervals. The brown line displays the data points unequally spaced while the gray one uses equal intervals (Few’s second chart). I had to make some assumptions regarding the reference date, so this is not the best example, but it is good enough to show the potential risk of using equal intervals with unequal intervals of time.
Bottom line, oversampling is a useful method for better resource allocation. We can view irregular time series as some sort of oversampling, provided there are no missing values and irregular intervals in the chart are consistent with intervals in the time series.
Grouping data points is always a tricky issue, and Stephen Few show it clearly, but we shouldn’t infer that “line graphs and irregular intervals is an incompatible partnership.”
(When using time series in Excel, make sure that category axis labels are recognized as dates. Alternatively, use a scatter plot with connected data points.)