Background: Vascularized nerve grafts were introduced in 1976. Subsequent studies have suggested the superiority of vascularized nerve grafts. In this study, the authors present 23 years’ experience with vascularized ulnar nerve graft. The factors influencing outcomes and a comparison with conventional nerve grafts are presented.
Methods: Between 1981 and 2003, 151 reconstructions with ulnar nerve were performed in 67 patients for brachial plexus injuries. Patients were divided into four groups: those with vascularized ulnar nerve graft from ipsilateral donors, pedicled or free, and those with vascularized ulnar nerve graft from contralateral donors to median nerve or to single motor targets (e.g., axillary, musculocutaneous, triceps) (n = 25, 21, 13, and 8, respectively).
Results: Patients with long denervation times yielded inferior results compared with those operated on early. Pedicle and free ipsilateral ulnar nerve grafts yielded comparable results for biceps muscle neurotization. Neurotization of biceps with a vascularized ulnar nerve graft from the contralateral root was not as effective as neurotization from ipsilateral donors. There was a difference in muscle grading when the target was the median nerve versus single motor targets such as axillary, musculocutaneous, or triceps, but there were no differences between preoperative and postoperative muscle grading of median innervated muscles.
Conclusions: Vascularized ulnar nerve grafting is the appropriate solution for brachial plexus injuries with C8 and T1 root avulsion, with outcomes that are superior to those achieved with conventional nerve grafts. Although few changes have been made over time, the use of ulnar nerve grafts for neurotization of multiple motor targets of the median nerve from contralateral donors is under consideration.