Such blanket demands often mean a settlement has been achieved. Background Geico sought to be reimbursed for windshield replacement services that were allegedly provided to its insured customers in its complaint made earlier this year. Geico originally sought to recover financial damages under the civil racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act (RICO) statutes. Geico provided the following rationale as to why AGE's auto glass claims should be seen as fraudulent: The alleged fraudulent scheme began in 2018 and continues to the present day, according to Geico's complaint. AGE and its owners, Dean and Lafasto then responded to Geico's complaint. "Defendants admit only that Geico seeks to recover more than $950,000 and oppose the request and deny the remaining allegations," a portion of the defendant's response reads.