The Court then dismissed the Section 13(d) claims against Murchinson and Anson as moot precisely because – as a result of NANO's suit – their coordination was finally revealed. The Court's ruling permits NANO to pursue its claims concerning Murchinson and Anson's misconduct in New York State court, which NANO fully intends to do. As NANO has alleged, and will pursue in New York State court, Murchinson and Anson breached the depositary agreement by and among NANO, the Bank of New York Mellon and ADS holders and owners by staging an illegal shareholder meeting, where they conducted an illegal vote and attempted to unlawfully replace NANO's rightful board members. NANO also intends to pursue other state law claims against Murchinson and Anson and ask the state court to redress the steps they have taken to unjustly enrich themselves at the expense of NANO and its investors. The state court complaint is planned to be filed this week.