We find that there are no anti-competitive effects emanating from Distell's conduct." On Distell's justification for cessation of supply, the Tribunal said it noted: "Distell's justifications for the cessation of supply relate to its concerns in general about illicit trade in alcohol products and the various harms arising to the economy and the duty-paid market, amongst others… Although Nu Africa contests Distell's position, we cannot dismiss the fact that Distell was within its contractual rights to cease supply if it believed that a violation of its illicit trade provisions had occurred."