Second, on the basis of the Supreme Court's recent Section 1782 decision in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 542 U.S. 241 (2004), the Court observed that it had discretion to deny the requested discovery "even if all the statutory requirements are met". Those requirements are, typically, quite easily satisfied: "(1) the person from whom discovery is sought resides (or is found) in the district of the district court to which the application is made, (2) the discovery is for use in a foreign proceeding before a tribunal, and (3) the application is made by a foreign or international tribunal or any interested person." Third, the Court adumbrated and applied the factors "for a court to consider when deciding whether to permit discovery: (1) whether the party from whom discovery is sought is a participant in a foreign proceeding, or already subject to the jurisdiction of the foreign tribunal; (2) the nature and character of the foreign proceedings; (3) the receptivity of the foreign tribunal to such judicial assistance; (4) whether the request is an attempt to circumvent foreign discovery restrictions; and (5) whether the request is unduly intrusive or burdensome.