Decision The Court, while referring to various Supreme Court judgments, held that enforcement and execution of a foreign award form part of the same proceedings under Sections 47, 48 and 49 of the Act. The Court further held that in case the argument of inapplicability of Article 136 of the Limitation Act raised by the objectors was accepted, it would be contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd. 2, apart from significantly damaging the interests of the award holders and being contrary to the objective of efficacious enforcement of foreign awards under the Act. Briefly encapsulated, the Supreme Court had, in Fuerst Day Lawson (supra), rejected the contention that that the petition for enforcement of the award ought to have been filed within three years therefrom.