For example, the Bureau believed that, in this context, these Loblaws' programs/agreements would: incentivize suppliers to penalize competing retailers for vigorous price competition, diminish supplier incentives to continue to offer promotions to competing retailers, and align supplier interests with Loblaws to increase wholesale prices to competing retailers. The Bureau was also concerned with the impact on smaller suppliers of certain other compensation requirements imposed by Loblaws: • Fill Rate Penalties: Financial charges levied by Loblaws on suppliers for "short deliveries" (i.e., when suppliers failed to achieve established "fill rate" standards by only delivering a percentage of the quantity ordered by Loblaws over a certain period of time). • Supply Chain Fees/Penalties: Financial penalties levied by Loblaws on suppliers for failing to achieve defined supply chain logistics standards.