The opinion noted that the "nine named Plaintiffs are current or former employees of Altice whose personal identifying information, including Social Security numbers, was stolen in the breach." Accordingly, the plaintiffs brought various claims, including "negligence, negligence per se, breach of implied contract, violation of the New York Labor Law, and violation of the Cable Communications Act of 1984" against Altice for purportedly "failing to take adequate measures to protect their data." Altice moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction asserting that the plaintiffs failed to sufficiently allege injury for Article III standing; Altice moved to compel arbitration for seven out of the nine named plaintiffs based on the General Terms and Conditions to which they supposedly agreed to as Altice subscribers; and Altice moved to dismiss New York Labor Law claims and the related negligence per se claims, as well as the claims for breach of an implied contract, for failure to state a claim.