The action alleges that in connection with the IPO and throughout the Class Period, TuSimple made false or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) TuSimple's commitment to safety was significantly overstated and the Company concealed basic problems with its technology; (2) the Company rushed the testing of its autonomous driving technology in order to deliver driverless trucks to the market ahead of competitors; (3) TuSimple had a corporate culture that suppressed or ignored safety concerns in favor of unrealistically ambitious testing and delivery schedules; (4) such conduct increased the likelihood of accidents involving the TuSimple's autonomous driving technology; and (5) such conduct invited enhanced regulatory scrutiny and investigatory action toward the Company.