Old Mutual's written notification of termination on six months' notice did not require any justification. The court a quo 's conclusion that Moyo had established that Old Mutual repudiated the contract when terminating it by providing him with six months' written notice to that effect was wrong. Since Moyo had failed to establish the first requisite for an interim interdict, viz a prima facie right to reinstatement that requires protection pending the finalisation of the action in which he claimed reinstatement as a contractual remedy, the court a quo should not have granted the interim interdict reinstating him in the position as CEO of Old Mutual.