In this context, the Board member argued that since the infringement pertains to the abuse of a dominant position through data amalgamation and utilization to thwart competitor activities and erect market entry barriers, the information and findings within the investigation file fall short of conclusively demonstrating that the infringement commenced the moment WhatsApp data was shared with Facebook. The Board member contended that it isn't the data collection or usage that constitutes the infringement, but rather the complication wrought upon competitor activities and the erection of market entry barriers. They concluded that the precise extent to which previous data collection and usage either constitutes a competition element or an abuse of dominant position would solely be ascertainable through the Authority's detailed examination and decision.