Nada added that any power Carlos Ghosn exerted over the alliance was "intuitu personae" (the Latin term refers to an agreement signed by one of the parties by virtue of the personality of the other party) and that Ghosn's alliance power was "only possible because of his history and positions in both companies" and thus should be denied to Ghosn's successor at Renault. Malaysian-born Nada, a UK-licensed lawyer, next detailed all of the ways and means to reduce Renault, which owns 43% of Nissan's stocks, to a mere sleeping partner, eviscerating Renault's shareholder's rights – already badly damaged in 2016 by the signing of the never-published (an oddity for two listed companies) RAMA. Briefing notes Taken in its entirety, the Nada document provided the roadmap for how Nissan would deal with the Ghosn ouster both short-term and long-term, even today.