uPI Semiconductor Corp. v. U.S. International Trade Commission and Richtek Technology Corp. v. U.S. International Trade Commission The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC, the Commission) finding a violation of a consent order agreed. uPI Semiconductor Corp. v. U.S. International Trade Commission and Richtek Technology Corp. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, Case Nos. 13-1157, 13-1159 (Fed. Cir., Sept. 25, 2014) (Newman, J.). The appeal arose from an enforcement proceeding before the ITC, based on a consent order issued in Inv. No. 33-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing Same. Prior to the hearing in the original investigation, uPI moved to terminate based on its unilateral offer to enter into a consent order requiring it to cease importation, or aiding and abetting importation, of products that infringed Richtek's patents or contained its trade secrets.