Thus, in sum and substance the Plaintiff's case rests on the fulcrum of the inoperability of the arbitration clause under the Charterparty agreement, rendering the same clause as redundant and consequent declaration of the same inoperable in the instant civil suit. A plea of the arbitration agreement being non-existent is taken and in the absence of an existing clause, it is contended that the disputes are non-arbitrable. The Court observed that if the waiver of Clause 29 of the Charterparty Agreement is tested on the anvil of the judicial dictum laid down in Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc v SBI Home Finance Ltd (2011) 5 SCC 532 (" Booz Allen "), it is clear that it is not covered under the well recognized examples of non-arbitrable disputes. The Court observed that a waiver does not operate against the world at large but is confined to the rights and obligations inter se the parties involved in the lis.