Bad jury. The Apple-Samsung patent trial may have ended with a jury verdict in Apple's favor, but the legal machinations continue between the two -- as expected. Samsung, which lost, filed a motion saying they believe that juror misconduct tainted the verdict, only we don't know what exactly they mean by misconduct because Samsung's lawyers at Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan redacted their reasons from a court filing last week. The San Jose Mercury News, though, thinks it has figured it out: "From a close examination of the statute and cases Samsung cited in the redacted section, we've discerned Samsung's two-pronged argument for juror misconduct: The nine-person jury improperly considered extraneous evidence during deliberations and jury foreman Velvin Hogan failed to disclose in voir dire that he was involved in 1993 litigation with a former employer that led him and his wife to declare personal bankruptcy."