While the court acknowledged that "[t]he corporate harms presented by non-compliance with cybersecurity safeguards increasingly call upon directors to ensure that companies have appropriate oversight systems in place," it nevertheless concluded that "[t]he growing risks posed by cybersecurity threats do not, however, lower the high threshold that a plaintiff must meet to plead a Caremark claim." 15 The court highlighted that for either prong of Caremark 's test, "a showing of bad faith conduct. .. is essential to establish director oversight liability," 16 and only a "sustained or systemic failure of the board to exercise oversight. .. will establish the lack of good faith that is a necessary condition to liability." 17