POSCO holds that it is well established that amendment after remand is appropriate when the original determination contains an error of inadvertence or mistakes, citing Badger-Powhatan, A Div. Of Figgie Int'l v. United States, 633 F. Supp. 1364, 1368 (CIT 1986); Bohler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United States, 946 F. Supp. 1003, 1007 (CIT 1996). Moreover, citing NTN Bearing Corp. v. United States, 74 F.3d 1204, 1208 (Fed. Cir. 1995) citing Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. United States, 899 F.2d 1185, 1191 (Fed. Cir 1990), POSCO states that the courts have repeatedly held that, "[it] is the duty of ITA to determine dumping margins as "accurately as possible."" Finally, POSCO argues that failure to correct the alleged error would "nullify and impair the very benefits that the WTO Panel had intended to protect when it rendered its decision in this case" (citing United States—Antidumping Measures on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils and Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Korea, WT/DS179/R, at 48.