In considering what is a " matter " for the purposes of Section 9, the Supreme Court considered relevant jurisprudence including with reference to Article II(3) of the UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the "New York Convention"), which is given effect in England through Section 9. The court cited the relevance of the New York Convention including with reference to its judgment in Enka Insaat, noting that it was also relevant to consider the jurisprudence of other countries as guides to interpretation of Section 9 so far as they have similarly worded provisions. The court concluded that there is a " general international consensus " in international arbitration in common law jurisdictions in determining matters that should be referred to arbitration. This was summarised: